On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: > > The important thing from my POV is that its not learning tree > from day one, as they will simply want to say - taking learning > tree course Perl101 means people get core competency and it > would become the usual noddy thing. Involving them later when > the forum was established would give them slightly less > clout. > Absolutely right. To bring Learning Tree (or any other Commercial Training House ) would mean we would prbably be compelled to go along with what they already teach - which may or may not be any good as far as we are concerned - after all they have a whole bunch invested in training materials and existing trainers which they are not going to give up easily ... Possibly a first step would be to work out how to certify the certifiers as it were ... /J\
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. David Cantrell
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Robert Shiels
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Simon Cozens
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Simon Cozens
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Dave Cross
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. alex
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Robert Shiels
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. alex
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. alex
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Robin Szemeti
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Robin Szemeti
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. David Cantrell