messaging
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Date
2017/10/14
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nazar Mokrynskyi
2017/10/14
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nazar Mokrynskyi
2017/10/14
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Jeff Burdges
2017/10/14
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nazar Mokrynskyi
2017/10/14
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Jeff Burdges
2017/10/13
[messaging] [Fwd: Re: Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework]
Jeff Burdges
2017/10/13
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nazar Mokrynskyi
2017/10/13
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
dawuud
2017/10/13
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nazar Mokrynskyi
2017/10/13
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
dawuud
2017/10/13
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Jeff Burdges
2017/10/13
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
dawuud
2017/10/12
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nazar Mokrynskyi
2017/10/12
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
dawuud
2017/10/12
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Jeff Burdges
2017/10/12
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Jeff Burdges
2017/10/10
[messaging] Phantom Anonymity Protocol [re: Ronion]
grarpamp
2017/10/10
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nadim Kobeissi
2017/10/10
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Erwan Ounn
2017/10/10
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nazar Mokrynskyi
2017/10/10
Re: [messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Ximin Luo
2017/10/10
[messaging] Ronion anonymous routing protocol framework
Nazar Mokrynskyi
2017/10/06
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Jeff Burdges
2017/10/06
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Jeff Burdges
2017/10/03
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Vincent Breitmoser
2017/10/03
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Joe
2017/09/28
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Trevor Perrin
2017/09/28
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Michael Rogers
2017/09/28
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Vincent Breitmoser
2017/09/28
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Nadim Kobeissi
2017/09/27
Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Trevor Perrin
2017/09/27
[messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
Vincent Breitmoser
2017/09/22
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
dawuud
2017/09/22
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
dawuud
2017/09/21
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
dawuud
2017/09/21
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
Michael Rogers
2017/09/21
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
dawuud
2017/09/21
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
Michael Rogers
2017/09/19
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
dawuud
2017/09/19
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
Michael Rogers
2017/09/18
[messaging] Keybase Teams Support
Maxwell Krohn
2017/09/17
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
Jeff Burdges
2017/09/17
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
dawuud
2017/09/16
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
Jeff Burdges
2017/09/16
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
dawuud
2017/09/16
Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
Trevor Perrin
2017/09/12
[messaging] NaCl comm relay: file support
Max Skibinsky
2017/08/08
[messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents
dawuud
2017/08/08
[messaging] np1sec audit and public release
Dmitri Vitaliev
2017/08/02
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
carlo von lynX
2017/08/02
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
Nathan of Guardian
2017/08/02
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
Michael Rogers
2017/07/27
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
Eleanor Saitta
2017/07/26
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
carlo von lynX
2017/07/26
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
carlo von lynX
2017/07/26
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
Nadim Kobeissi
2017/07/26
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
Alec Muffett
2017/07/26
Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta
Yui Hirasawa
2017/07/21
[messaging] Briar is in public beta
Michael Rogers
2017/07/12
Re: [messaging] new peerio architecture
Nadim Kobeissi
2017/07/12
Re: [messaging] new peerio architecture
Mikalai Birukou
2017/07/12
[messaging] new peerio architecture
Michael Carbone
2017/04/04
Re: [messaging] Sesame spec
Trevor Perrin
2017/04/03
Re: [messaging] Sesame spec
Tom Ritter
2017/03/31
[messaging] Sesame spec
Trevor Perrin
2017/03/15
[messaging] Evaluation of ZRTP clients
Dominik Schuermann
2017/02/22
Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat)
Trevor Perrin
2017/02/14
Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat)
Dominik Schuermann
2017/02/14
Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat)
Jack O'Connor
2017/02/10
Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat)
Trevor Perrin
2017/02/10
Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat)
Jack O'Connor
2017/02/09
Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat)
Natanael
2017/02/09
[messaging] RFC: (n+1)sec secure group chat - protocol specification draft
Ruud Koolen
2017/02/09
[messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat)
Trevor Perrin
2017/02/08
[messaging] CONIKS vs Key Transparency vs Certificate Transparency vs Blockchains
Tao Effect
2017/02/08
[messaging] Keybase Chat
Jack O'Connor
2017/02/04
Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server?
Nadim Kobeissi
2017/02/04
Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server?
Ron Garret
2017/02/04
Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server?
Nadim Kobeissi
2017/02/04
Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server?
Ron Garret
2017/02/04
Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server?
Nadim Kobeissi
2017/02/04
Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server?
Vincent Breitmoser
2017/02/04
[messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server?
Ron Garret
2017/01/17
[messaging] Regarding the "AD" Value in X3DH Spec
Nadim Kobeissi
2017/01/02
Re: [messaging] SKS gossip protocol mentor?
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017/01/02
[messaging] SKS gossip protocol mentor?
Daniel Roesler
2016/12/23
Re: [messaging] evolving Autocrypt effort: e-mail encryption for everyone
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/22
[messaging] evolving Autocrypt effort: e-mail encryption for everyone
holger krekel
2016/12/12
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Tobias Mueller
2016/12/08
[messaging] join us tomorrow for 'Fridays with (n+1)sec' chat
Dmitri Vitaliev
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] confidentiality trumps authenticity was: OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] confidentiality trumps authenticity was: OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
holger krekel
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
Tony Arcieri
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] confidentiality trumps authenticity was: OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/08
[messaging] confidentiality trumps authenticity was: OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
holger krekel
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
Vincent Breitmoser
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
Natanael
2016/12/08
[messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/08
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Bjarni Runar Einarsson
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails
Peter Gutmann
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails
Peter Gutmann
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Natanael
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Bjarni Runar Einarsson
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Trevor Perrin
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Robert Obryk
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Bjarni Runar Einarsson
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Robert Obryk
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Bjarni Runar Einarsson
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Maxwell Krohn
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Trevor Perrin
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Bjarni Runar Einarsson
2016/12/07
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Moritz Bartl
2016/12/06
[messaging] berlin mail encryption meetup Dec 14-18th / INBOME
holger krekel
2016/12/05
Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails
Peter Gutmann
2016/12/05
Re: [messaging] First Pre-Release of coniks-go (0.1.0)
Ian Miers
2016/12/05
[messaging] First Pre-Release of coniks-go (0.1.0)
Marcela Melara
2016/12/05
Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/04
Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails
Peter Gutmann
2016/12/04
Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails
Peter Gutmann
2016/12/04
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Trevor Perrin
2016/12/04
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/12/04
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Ben Laurie
2016/12/03
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Trevor Perrin
2016/12/03
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Daniel McCarney
2016/12/03
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Trevor Perrin
2016/12/03
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Daniel McCarney
2016/11/30
Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec
Nadim Kobeissi
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec
Sam Lanning
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec
Moxie Marlinspike
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec
Sven M. Hallberg
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Taylor R Campbell
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
stef
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec
Nikos Roussos
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec
stef
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec
Nadim Kobeissi
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] [openpgp] On Signed-Only Mails
Vincent Breitmoser
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] [openpgp] On Signed-Only Mails
Peter Gutmann
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Vincent Breitmoser
2016/11/29
Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Peter Gutmann
2016/11/29
[messaging] On Signed-Only Mails
Vincent Breitmoser
2016/11/22
[messaging] 33c3 : We Fix the Net talks
Jeff Burdges
2016/11/21
Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec
Nadim Kobeissi
2016/11/20
[messaging] Double Ratchet spec
Trevor Perrin
2016/11/09
Re: [messaging] X3DH
Trevor Perrin
2016/11/08
Re: [messaging] X3DH
stef
2016/11/04
[messaging] X3DH
Trevor Perrin
2016/10/29
Re: [messaging] deniability data point
Jeff Burdges
2016/10/28
Re: [messaging] deniability data point
Sam Lanning
2016/10/28
Re: [messaging] deniability data point
Joseph Bonneau
2016/10/28
Re: [messaging] deniability data point
Tony Arcieri
2016/10/28
[messaging] deniability data point
Trevor Perrin
2016/10/22
Re: [messaging] XEdDSA specification
Trevor Perrin
2016/10/20
Re: [messaging] XEdDSA specification
Martin Thomson
2016/10/20
[messaging] XEdDSA specification
Trevor Perrin
2016/10/11
Re: [messaging] RFC: (n+1)sec secure group chat - security properties and UX design
Ruud Koolen
2016/10/09
Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation
Jeremy Cahill
2016/10/07
Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation
Tony Arcieri
2016/10/07
Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation
Jason A. Donenfeld
2016/10/05
Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation
Trevor Perrin
2016/10/05
Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation
Matthew Hodgson
2016/10/04
[messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation
Trevor Perrin
2016/10/04
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Hanno Böck
2016/10/03
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
carlo von lynX
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen e2e encryption component
Natanael
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Jeff Burdges
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen e2e encryption component
Tony Arcieri
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen e2e encryption component
Ximin Luo
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Tony Arcieri
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Ximin Luo
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Tony Arcieri
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Tom Ritter
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Ben Laurie
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Matthew Hodgson
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Ximin Luo
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Tobias Markmann
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Ximin Luo
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Tobias Markmann
2016/10/02
Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Hanno Böck
2016/10/01
[messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol
Tony Arcieri
2016/09/12
Re: [messaging] RFC: (n+1)sec secure group chat - security properties and UX design
Ximin Luo
2016/09/12
[messaging] RFC: (n+1)sec secure group chat - security properties and UX design
Ruud Koolen
2016/08/29
[messaging] Signal Double Ratchet (Axolotl Protocol) with header encryption
Linus Lotz
2016/08/28
Re: [messaging] Mesh/Recrypt
Andy Isaacson
2016/08/22
Re: [messaging] Mesh/Recrypt
Tony Arcieri
2016/08/22
Re: [messaging] Mesh/Recrypt
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016/08/22
[messaging] Mesh/Recrypt
Tony Arcieri
2016/08/07
[messaging] Wireshark Dissector
Tarkan Y
2016/07/27
Re: [messaging] Axolotl for email
Микола
2016/07/27
Re: [messaging] Axolotl for email
GDR!
2016/06/29
Re: [messaging] Mailvelope Key Server and "fallback" keyservers (was Re: Axolotl for email)
Tankred Hase
2016/06/27
[messaging] Mailvelope Key Server and "fallback" keyservers (was Re: Axolotl for email)
Trevor Perrin
2016/06/27
Re: [messaging] Axolotl for email
Wei Chuang
2016/06/23
Re: [messaging] Axolotl for email
Tankred Hase
2016/06/13
Re: [messaging] Email obstacles and experiments
Wei Chuang
2016/06/12
[messaging] Email obstacles and experiments
Trevor Perrin
2016/06/12
Re: [messaging] The downsides of no key verification
lists@tobi.rocks
2016/06/10
Re: [messaging] Axolotl for email
Jeff Burdges
Earlier messages
Later messages