> David comments to Gav -- > >> You know I can't think of a good reason not to call DQ >> sacred, perhaps our highest value. I get the fear about the >> negative aspects of religion, but I am also sure that why >> we invent religion is because DQ is awesome and impressive. >> Religion goes badly wrong, but so does SOM, freedom, >> democracy, sugar, all SQ, but don't mean we'd prefer >> nothing, the good has to be distinguished from the bad, >> such is quality. > > Either I'm getting soft-headed in my old age, or you guys are starting to > make sense! > > Now, if only Dave could see that he's answered Gav's rhetorical question, > "so, what use is the SOM distinction?" by his statement "the good has to > be > distinguished from the bad, such is quality." Replace "quality" with > "value" and you've just described the morality of Essentialism. >
DM: Values have always been key to the MOQ. Quality implies values. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
