In a message dated 5/5/99 7:02:35 PM, you wrote:
>Alain : I propose that we distinguish between belonging to mailing list
>versus being a full-fledged member of the collaboration. Anyone can
>suscribe to the list, but to become a member you have to :
>
>(1) make at least one contribution ;
>(2) be nominated by at least one member ;
>(3) get the nod from a representative number of members, say 25%;
Well, since we have no members at this time, only people belonging to
a mailing group, it makes sense to have everyone who's participated get an
automatic rank of Member.
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Scott Raney
- Re: Re: OODL: licensing issues MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: licensing issues DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: licensing issues DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Rob Cozens
- Re: Re: OODL: licensing issues Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: licensing issues DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Adrian Sutton
- Re: Re: OODL: licensing issues MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: licensing issues Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: licensing issues M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: licensing issues DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: licensing issues M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: licensing issues Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: licensing issues DeRobertis
