Has it ever been considered that it may be time to restructure the PHP
Group, if nothing else than bringing in some new blood?

On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following to Sascha Schumann :

> At 10:30 PM 7/9/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > > Sascha, don't come to conclusions too quickly if you do want to improve
> > > your weak spots.
> >
> >     Andi, have you ever considered that your approach of
> >     "guiding" other people is not appreciated?
> Yes. That is what a guide is. He can try and guide you but it doesn't mean 
> you have to appreciate the guidance nor take the advice. You are free to 
> ignore whatever I write.
> Anyway, I think right now the easiest thing for us to do is to move to re2c 
> without your sources (it should be relatively trivial as it's just a 
> scanner and we wrote the original regex's) and allow for better 
> communication to address the issues that were raised (both the team issues 
> and the license issues) when things cool down a bit.
> I don't particularly like Andre's suggestion of keeping everything on 
> group@ because I find that as time has gone by there are many active 
> contributors on php-dev@ who have a right to be more involved in PHP. 
> Actually I often find people in the community who are more involved in PHP 
> than some on the PHP Group. So as I mentioned, it should be in a more 
> diplomatic and constructive manner but I definitely think that the whole 
> "PHP Group is sacred" way is not the right way. I think the PHP developers 
> & community have a lot of great ideas and great inputs (even if some of 
> these are not things I necessarily agree with) and we should probably 
> adjust our whole working mechanism.
> Andi

PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to