Just a quick follow up.

Seems still to have issues, 'Descend into... @ is unchecked and 'append
sheet no to...' has been tried both ways. 
I am still getting some ERC errors on some pins connected to power
objects in the ERC. These errors now match up to corresponding netlist
import errors 'net already exists'

The issue seems to be where there is only one power object of the same
net on a sheet. Its as if these pin/power port connections are being
treated like single pin nets on a sheet level and not connected

For some reason these are giving errors, in this case in idkey.sch

See sheet contents

#2 Error   Unconnected Passive Pin On Net 3V3A
   ID KEY.SCH(R400-2 @870,665)
#13 Error   Unconnected Power Pin On Net GND
   ID KEY.SCH(U402-1 @970,460)

If I connect the power nets on the top sheet I do not get the error,  

The ERC matrix is not set to flag any PASS/POWER connections as an
error, only if they are unconnected (no NOERC marker present)

Might need to fix this one after import to 2004 as the connectivity
models are slightly different.

I will investigate more later (one of our colleagues goes home to Korea
tomorrow, so beer is calling just now). 

Best Regards

John A. Ross

RSD Communications ltd
WWW    http://www.rsd.tv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 5:07 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Connectivity - Netlist issues
> At 09:58 AM 5/4/2004, John A. Ross [Design] wrote:
> >I have had a few discussions previously on this list about the 
> >connectivity models within 99SE and how I have had in some 
> cases seen 
> >errors where power ports are not treated as global when using Sheet 
> >Symbols/Port connections.
> Haven't seen that. Suspicious....
> >Before committing the last of my larger designs to 2004 I 
> would like to 
> >track down the error of my ways.
> Excellent idea.
> >Some screenshots here
> >http://www.proteluser.com/bbs/showthread.php?p=68#post68
> >
> >A short summary is that the design has one parent sheet and the rest 
> >are child sheets. [...] Connectivity model is set to sheet Symbol / 
> >Port connections as it should be.[...]
> You have Descend into Sheet Parts enabled. This is not what 
> you might expect from the name. A Sheet Part is a subsheet 
> that descends from a component. I've never used one, and you 
> probably aren't either. But this setting can cause a number 
> of weird problems, depending perhaps on the components you have used.
> You might also enable Append Sheet Numbers to Local Nets. 
> With the connectivity you are using, you don't intend for any 
> local nets to be connected to a local net of the same name on 
> the other sheet. What Protel will do, as I recall, if such 
> nets exist, is to create separate nets in the netlist, with 
> the same name. This can also cause weird problems.... This 
> may be related, if for some reason Protel is not recognising 
> your power ports as global. At least you'll know!
> >But Update PCB fails with errors. If previewed it wants to 
> rip up the 
> >power nets completely.
> >
> >If I generate a netlist and then try to load it manually I get a 
> >similar issue but with more detail, this time the power nets 
> are ripped 
> >up and I get netlist load errors 'net already exists' as it tries to 
> >add many instances of the same power net name (one instance 
> per sheet).
> Yup. It is treating them as local. Change the settings as I 
> suggested and see what happens.
> >If I add a sheet entry to each sheet symbol with the name of 
> the power
> >net and as a sheet port to the child sheets all is happy, no errors.
> Yes, this forces the nets to be treated as sheet entry/port 
> connections.
> >My understanding was always that power ports were always 
> global, but I
> >seem to have an exception here, unless I cannot see the wood for the
> >trees.
> I didn't think it would make a difference, but do the power 
> nets exist on 
> the top level schematic? Normally, I'd put any outside-world 
> connections on 
> the top level, including power.
> You should not have to place ports on the sheets to connect power, 
> though.... I think fixing those settings will either solve 
> the problem or 
> show us better where it lies. What you did not show in the 
> images is what 
> is on the child sheets....

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
* Contact the list manager:
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to