RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

What crack pipe are you smoking out of? Those specs are way beyond what's necessary! D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 400 Mailboxes

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

I'll bet he does! I'll bet I do and still will! I'll bet there are a lot of us out there that didn't over-spec our servers... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

Typically, I don't think you have a friggin clue about what you're talking about. I've had a 20gb+ store on a box running with 512MB of RAM. It worked just fine... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:35 PM To:

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

Sorry boss, I'd venture to say you know a lot less than most of us. My SQL box running a QMS app doesn't even use that much hardware and it's waaay more over tasked resource-wise than my Exchange server. Sounds like you robbed someone blind... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

Memory usage on Exchange is whatever exchange wants to use. If it wants a gig of RAM, it will take it, if it wanted 2gigs of RAM, it would take it. I suggest you read some more... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

That's a network problem, not an exchange problem... D -Original Message- From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization How many, and what speed is your processor on your Exchange

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Ha ha ha ha LOL. Crack pipe. Nice one Don. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 14:36

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

that is in your opinion an overkillWouldn't this be considered an asset? Maybe you should evaluate your own tactics with upper management. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

higher ups to purchase a system that is in your opinion an overkillWouldn't this be considered an asset? Maybe you should evaluate your own tactics with upper management. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

? In addition, you are chastising me for convincing higher ups to purchase a system that is in your opinion an overkillWouldn't this be considered an asset? Maybe you should evaluate your own tactics with upper management. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

alternatives. Second, I have never claimed to be the foremost expert on Exchange Server. I am here with an open mind and willing and needing to learn just like everyone else. However, I do intend to post my opinions. Thanks for your time. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Someone would have to be on some good drugs to over-spec a server like that. I guess we're the unfortunate bunch with actual

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

the question has the opportunity to decide whether to implement your solution or mine. I am happy with my solution as are my users. Performance is awesome and the server runs smoothly. That means no late phone calls and no disgruntled users. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

Yeah, he can come and count my 1000+ implementations as well... They're spread across the world though, so it might be an expensive trip for him... D -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Someone would have to be on some good drugs to over-spec a server like that. I guess we're the unfortunate bunch with actual

RE: DNS Changes take how long

If'n they'll change the serial number on their DNS server, the updates will begin automagically. Otherwise, 24-72 hours is the norm... You should ask them though... D -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

I haven't even begun to flame you! I'm sure there are those around here who will attest to that... It gets much better than this... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Funny, I have smooth running servers, happy users and happy management all in one big bundle. Are you saying that the more money spent

RE: DNS Changes take how long

- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 11, 2002 09:55 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: DNS Changes take how long Subject: RE: DNS Changes take how long If'n they'll change the serial number on their DNS server, the updates will begin

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

intend to post my opinions. Thanks for your time. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Someone would have to be on some good drugs to over-spec

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

opinion, if your having a problem with a system it's always a good time to evaluate your infrastructure and hardware to keep these problems from occurring in the first place. Thanks for the time. Murphy -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11

RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus

You bastard! Need a body to fill the second seat? D -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus That's the AB I know.. Way to go, High

RE: Singing The Administrator's Lament

LMAO!!! -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Singing The Administrator's Lament Thought I would share this with you all, go this from Tony Redmond's book Exchange Server for

RE: store.exe

I wouldn't suggest that. Exchange will give up the RAM when the system requests it. It's the nature of how it works. Are you actually seeing performance issues or do you just want to limit the usage? D -Original Message- From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January

RE: exchange server freezes

Hey monkey boy, what kind of server hardware do you have!?!?! D -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange server freezes I wondering if my ups cause this over the weekend

RE: Exchange Crash

I don't think you're being an a$$hole Tom. In fact, I have the same Q Article saved for that particular instance of a problem if I had ever run into it.3 As you said, Research is your friend... One should become intimately familiar with it if they desire to succeed in this industry. D

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

LMAO -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I hear that ya'll take the day off in Chicago when Drew starts counting from day zero. So

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

That will have to be added to the quote file for 2002! :o) D -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I hear that ya'll take the day off in

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

This from a man who has taken a rash of sh!t... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) If you don't like it...beat it!!! Simple as

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

of the Baskervilles? - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

I'm fricken hilarious! I kill me sometimes! D -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I think I'm damn funny! -Original Message-

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

!!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I'm fricken hilarious! I kill me sometimes! D -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: connecting exchange 5.5 and 2000 without upgrading or combini ng

X.400 and Directory Replication connectors should garner enough info for what you need to do... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q147/7/75.asp http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q147/7/72.asp These articles will be a good start... D -Original Message-

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

That would depend on the thickness of your skin... :o) D -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Question: I'm probably one of the newest

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Its not the thickness of my Skin I'm worried about PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin

RE: Clustering Book

I understand Bob Barker has experience in this arena as well... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering Book I have some Exchange books clustered on my

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can

RE: More Exchange Help (this is just not my day...)

Michael, Read the Q Articles that Kevin and I sent you. E2K is nested in the AD structure. Without wiping out your entire AD domain or following the Q Articles we sent you, you will be SOL. D -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January

RE: changing port

I look forward to those who are sending you mail to connect to a port other than the RFC standard port 25 then. Or are you saying mail will still be received on port 25 to the Mail Marshall server and then forwarded off of port 97 to the Exchange server? D -Original Message- From:

RE: More Exchange Help (this is just not my day...)

Let me understand this... You rebuilt a W2K server from the ground up that was a member of a W2K AD with E2K installed and you're having these problems? Is anyone else smiling or laughing right now? Might I suggest you read this link and learn to use this website...

RE: anyone know

Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Well, Ellensburg is in the mountains. Of course you'll freeze your hiney off! ;o) I do like Major Applewhite as well though, too bad he's playin the Dawgs

RE: New year, no contract

Gary is most certainly no donkey! You and your spamming friend Paul are both shall I say... Ignorant, pompous, moron's. You and your spamming friend have earned the title's of Richard Cranium Sr. and Richard Cranium Jr.. I'll let the two of you fight over who was the first to be denoted as

RE: Haiku Friday

No Haiku here William was Being sarcastic As he can Be at times D Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met on the street. -Elbert Hubbard -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:06 AM To:

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

You're running W2K Adv. Server on a P-133??? I seriously doubt that! D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Haha! no, everything is on a rack server now..mo gigage processor, and rammage! This server made all the difference in the world with my environment. I was giving scanmail a bike to run a car race back then. :) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday

RE: anyone know

Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I hope they do...[2] [2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3] [3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4] [4] HI SHERRY!!! ;o) The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we

RE: anyone know

Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Go Huskies!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I

RE: anyone know

As a side note, I'm fixin to move to NC which will be considerably warmer though. ;o) D There is nothing to fear but fear itself. -Franklin D. Roosevelt -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and there. D Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Client Connectivity

U... You're trying to access your exchange server from the internet You DO realize how unsecure that is right??? Why would you even attempt such a thing with VPN and OWA in place D Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it. -Henry David Thoreau

RE: Client Access

How many times are you going to send this Changing the subject line will not garner different responses... D Hazards: There is an Island of Opportunity in the middle of every difficulty, miss that, though, and you're pretty much doomed. - http://www.despair.com -Original Message-

RE: Client Access Problem

For the love of god Stop sending the same friggin message with a different subject! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:26 AM To:

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Id give you a big hug if it wouldn't be all awkward, then would have to punch each other to maintain a manly appearance. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto

RE: Restoration Solutions?

You backup your server using an AV solution??? That seems strange... Not to mention, impossible. Now, if you're using ArcCrapIt, you're still in deep doodoo. It's a widely known fact that while ArcCrapIt may back up your server, it is very unlikely that it will restore in the event of a

RE: Restoration Solutions?

NT Backup works great if you need something simple. As far as restoration procedures, I would suggest you read the DR whitepapers on the MS Site. I would also suggest a spare server, running exchange to do the test restores on. At a minimum, test restores should be done every 90 days. That

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

::High Five:: -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 We ain't huggin! ;o) How about a secret handshake or something? D Incompetence: When you Earnestly Believe you

RE: Client Access Problem

]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Client Access Problem LOL After seeing the fourth post, I just knew steam was starting to come out of your ears! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Client Access

So you have a PIX in front of your Exchange server??? When was this put in place? D Incompetence: When you Earnestly Believe you can compensate for a lack of skill by doubling your efforts, there's no end to what you can't do. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ed

RE: Client Access

Well, having some familiarity with the PIX, you'd have to open around 64000 ports up to access Exchange from the internet. Unless you have hacked the registry of the Exchange server to statically assign the ports that Exchange uses for communications. However, my question still stands... If

RE: Client Access

Since those static mappings are done in the registry, what upgrade could have changed that? D Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange

RE: Client Access

box but I suppose it would depend on how the Exch box is configured. If the system has one network card and points directly to the PIX as it's default gateway you should be fine. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange

RE: Client Access

Access I guess I'm confused. After re-reading the original post I'm not sure what was actually upgraded. I see Exch 5.5 then IE 4.01. Did you upgrade Internet Explorer Browser? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:30 PM

RE: Client Access

Oh, there you go. SP4 would have changed things back the WAY they SHOULD be. D Who's General Failure and why's he reading my disk? -Anon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.

I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on having to do more next year and the years to come. :o) D A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,

RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.

October 25th would be a bad day for me as well. That's my Birthday, not to mention, it's a Friday. ;o) D Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December

RE: Client Access

. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Client Access

to 5.5 SP4? Which...by the way, is what seems to be the case here but that part was left out. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Client Access That's what I originally thought. That's

RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001

That one sounds familiar!! ;o) D If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing. -Anon -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001 Fix

RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001

BSD Skunks the Penguin ;o) D In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. -Desiderius Erasmus -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases -

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

Do you ever read any whitepapers or manuals? This is pretty friggin self explanatory sh!t. D The road to a friend's house is never long. -Danish proverb -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

Gee, ever been to www.microsoft.com/exchange ? If a trainstation is where the train stops, what's a workstation...? -Anon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

Tis not necessary. You should backup the priv, pub, and log files. Flush the logs when complete preferably with Circular logging disabled. D Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

an open file manager:) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Tis not necessary. You should backup the priv, pub, and log files. Flush the logs when

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Why not??? :) Actually if it worked right it would be cool because it would be like having an offline backup everynight. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Exchange and Intranet

www.cdolive.com Oh, and what version of Exchange are we talking about here? D When you choose your friends, don't be short-changed by choosing personality over character. -W. Somerset Maugham -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December

RE: Exchange and Intranet

Then check out CDOLive... Otherwise, you may want to wait until to finish your AD upgrade, upgrade to E2K and then use the AD features Kevin speaks of. D When you choose your friends, don't be short-changed by choosing personality over character. -W. Somerset Maugham -Original

RE: Information Store Problems???

suggested, but it's fine. I also checked to make sure that I hadn't turned up the logging on something to maximum by accident and forgotten about it. Jim B. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: AV! a full time job?

You take on every role yourself... YOU ROCK!! :o) D Windows 95 and Windows 98, the only operating systems that has the year-2000 bug built into the name. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange

RE: AV! a full time job?

Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? You're the best!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? You take on every role yourself... YOU ROCK!! :o) D Windows 95

RE: Recovering Deleted Items

Here you go... Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Client\Options] DumpsterAlwaysOn=dword:0001 http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q178/6/30.ASP D The road to a friend's house is never long. -Danish proverb -Original Message- From:

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

Funny, I've been working in this field for 6 years and M$ has never meant Microsoft as far as I can remember. I find it rather insulting that you do! D A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned into a pile of dust. -Original Message- From: steven parks

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

and roof over my families head. You will not be receiving AB Approval either. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Funny, I've been working in this field

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard No, you didn't hurt anyone's feelings, but you DID lessen your chances or receiving any kind of valuable assistance in the future. D Overconfidence: Before you attempt

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

Exmerge is on the W2K CD??? Off to go check that out... D There are many paths to the top of the mountain, but only one view. -Harry Millner -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

Move Server Wizard I meant to say the Exchange CD rom under support\utils It will baulk about dlls but just add a path statement pointing to your exchsrvr\bin directory Minor faux paus smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 3:51

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

Of course, you must understand that most of us realize that the SIS is broke when exmerge is run, but not supported by MS??? Doubt it... D A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in \support\utils\readme.doc. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

I'm curious as to which part of MS you work in... The Exchange team? PSS? MCS? D Press any key to continue or any other key to quit... -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$

RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard

, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Strange, I've never seen Exmerge crash my server, but I suppose there is a possibility. Then again, wouldn't

RE: Monitoring email

Not to mention, a half way decent firewall with logging turned on will tell you what sites the said user has been accessing. That takes the deleting of History right out of the picture. D Profanity is the one language all programmers know best. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis

RE: Livevault backup software

I have... Whatcha want to know? D -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Livevault backup software Has anyone used Livevault? My company is looking at them as a potential solution

RE: Livevault backup software

]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Livevault backup software Would you trust your exchange backups to it? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Disaster Server

clus*ter (klstr) n. A group of the same or similar elements gathered or occurring closely together; a bunch: She held out her hand, a small tight cluster of fingers (Anne Tyler). Linguistics. Two or more successive consonants in a word, as cl and st in the word cluster. A group of academic

  1   2   3   4   5   >