Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

Deng Hui- I uploaded all the Papyrus files to the working branch. There is an outstanding issue open in Gerrit for you to approve to commit these files to the branch. Could you possibly do this so we can start downloading the model for people to work on starting tomorrow? Thank you, Jessie On T

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle stereotype

...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 1:51 AM To: yangxu (H) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; denghui (L) ; onap-...@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle stereotype Hi Xu- That's the reason I made the comment. The wiki should be aligned

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on obsoleting some attributes/datatypes of the resource IM

Hello IM modelers, According to yesterday call, resource IM team would like to call for agreement on obsoleting some attributes/datatypes of the resource IM. The reason for obsoleting those artifacts is that their functionalities are covered by HPA related attributes and thus redundant in the mo

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for owner of R3 Modeling high level requirement

Hello modelers, According to yesterday call, we would like to call for owner for each high level requirement. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes The responsibility of owner are shown as below: 1) Coordinate both IM and DM model spec c

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle stereotype

> *To:* onap-discuss ; denghui (L) < > denghu...@huawei.com> > *Cc:* onap-...@lists.onap.org > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle > stereotype > > > > Just a minor comment: > > The lifecycle states ARE the applied stereotypes

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Modeling Project Casablanca M1 Scope

Hi Brian Hope previous email could answer your questions, thanks a lot for your kind review Best regards, DENG Hui From: Brian Hedstrom [mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Friday, July 6, 2018 5:57 AM To: onap-discuss Cc: denghui (L) ; Gildas Lanilis Subject: [modeling] Modeli

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Modeling Project Casablanca M1 Scope

Modeling Subcommittee: I was reviewing the Casablanca Release Deck which Gildas presented today on the TSC call and the TSC approved. In looking at the

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello Jessie Answer inline == > From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 3:46 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements Hello DENG

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello DENG Hui, I think it has been beneficial to collect and review the modeling requirements for R3. Thank you for doing this. I have a few questions for you, if you would be so kind as to answer: 1. The requirements were supposed to be completed, according to the Casablanca Release Calend

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data Modeling Interest Group agenda for July 2nd

Hi all, Today we will be holding an extended (2 hours instead of the usual 1h) call, 10am to 12pm eastern. As you all know, we have 2 quite different approaches to choose from: 1. SOL001 model for all, and 2. SOL001 model for onboarding, ONAP model downstream. The parties will present their positi

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data Model Interest Group agenda for 06/25/2018 call

Hi all, The Data Model Interest Group is back to business, and here is the agenda for the today meeting: ## Presenter Subject Time 1 Thinh Ng

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello Kevin and all I have created a high level requirements wiki page based on the input of Beijing event: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements Please help to contribute to the spreadsheet as soon as possible, I also moved Kevin's draft proposal under this wi

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling

Sure, we will try DENG Hui From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:20 PM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: Re: Modeling Thanks you. Also please share with the TSC what requirements your subcommittee gen

[onap-discuss][modeling] Initial proposal of ONAP R3 Data Model

Hi all, FYI, the initial proposal of the ONAP Data Model has just been published at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+DM+Base+Proposal It includes the Reference part (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+DM+Reference ) as well as a special section for examples (https://wiki.onap.org/

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling

Thanks you. Also please share with the TSC what requirements your subcommittee generated so the TSC can assess the different views. Mazin On Jun 20, 2018, at 12:08 PM, denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Mazin We will try to summarize the major disagreements and bring it to TSC

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling

Hi Mazin We will try to summarize the major disagreements and bring it to TSC in next 2 weeks. Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 11:33 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: M

[onap-discuss] Modeling

Deng Hui, Thanks for your presentation today, and I really appreciate the modeling committee working together. Lots has been accomplished since R1. I just wanted to articulate the conversation main points. 1. Modeling approaches for ONAP releases should be approved by the TSC. This should be d

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Canceled - DM Interest Group Call @ Monday June 18

Hi All, The today meeting of the Data Modeling Interest Group (https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=34373995) is canceled. Regards, Anatoly Katzman ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/li

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

whether he (and > other interested people)could accept it. > Anyway, I encourage the proposer to discuss with Jessie to address her > comments. Or we need to discuss it the next week. > > Best regards, > Xu Yang > *发件人：*jessie jewitt > *收件人：*yangxu (H), > *抄 送：*denghu

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

e the proposer to discuss with Jessie to address her comments. Or we need to discuss it the next week. Best regards, Xu Yang 发件人：jessie jewitt 收件人：yangxu (H), 抄 送：denghui (L),onap-discuss@lists.onap.org,onap-tsc, 时间：2018-06-16 02:03:57 主 题：Re: [onap-discuss][modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolet

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

” stereotype of the model is still under discussion. The interest > group just agrees that the IISOMI definition of “obsolete” fits the current > intention of the proposal and decides to use the term. > > > > BR, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.or

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

12:05 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM Hello Deng Hui- Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied stereotype&

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

Hello Deng Hui- Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied stereotype", on which this column in the wiki table is based, has "obsolete" as an artifact lifecycle option, with its definition supplied in the IISOMI Modeling Guidelines. This is the definition of "obsolete" in tho

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

Hello all, This is 1 week’s call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM. The intention is to mark several attributes/datatypes of the current model as “obsoleted” as their functionalities are covered by some other attributes. Detailed information

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session - Reminder and Bridge

Hello- This is a reminder that the Papyrus training session will take place today at 9am Eastern time. Bridge info: https://zoom.us/j/746737796 Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailma

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

Sorry for the continued confusion about the bridge. We will be using Kevin's bridge: https://zoom.us/j/746737796 Thank you, Jessie On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 6:13 PM, jessie jewitt < jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote: > The VNFSDK Modeling team is hosting a Papyrus training session on > Wedne

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

There has been an update to the bridge, and I've asked Kenny to please issue the invitation again. The bridge we will use will be: https://zoom.us/j/103916386 Please mark your calendars accordingly. Jessie p.s. Sorry for the confusion On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:52 AM, SCAGGS, KEVIN wrote: > All

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data Modeling Interest Group 2018-06-11 agenda

Good morning/evening everyone, The Data Modeling Interest Group is meeting today again on the bridge https://zoom.us/j/880773832, and here is the agenda for the today call: 1. 10 min. - Arun Gupta will open the call with a brief update on the Multicloud Data Model 2. 15 min - Anatoly Katzman: W

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

A meeting announcement was sent out that this meeting was today. It is NEXT Wednesday June 13th at 6AM. Sorry for the inconvenience. -Jessie On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:52 AM, SCAGGS, KEVIN wrote: > All, > > > > We will use the following zoom meeting instead. > > > > https://zoom.us/j/987452560 > >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

All, We will use the following zoom meeting instead. https://zoom.us/j/987452560 Regards, Kevin From: jessie jewitt Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 8:14 PM To: onap-discuss Cc: MAYER, ANDREW J ; SCAGGS, KEVIN ; Brian Hedstrom Subject: [modeling] Papyrus Training Session The VNFSDK Modeling te

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

uot;ZoneGroup", "NFVI-node" to support Casablanca use cases; and realizing these in the various public clouds and owner-operated clouds of interest. -Arun From: HU, BIN Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 10:30 AM To: Zhipeng Huang ; denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc ; GU

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of jessie jewitt Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 09:14 To: onap-discuss Cc: SCAGGS, KEVIN Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session The VNFSDK Modeling team is hosting a Papyrus training session on Wednesday, June 13th at 6am Pacific / 9am

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

The VNFSDK Modeling team is hosting a Papyrus training session on Wednesday, June 13th at 6am Pacific / 9am Eastern / 9pm China time This session will cover: 1. How to install Papyrus 2. The value of using a modeling tool such as Papyrus within ONAP 3. How to use Papyrus alongside the wiki. We w

[onap-discuss] [modeling] R3 Data Model weekly meeting

Hi all, I am glad to announce that today at 10am est we are going to hold the first meeting of the R3 Data Model weekly forum. The forum is a spin-off from the ONAP Modeling Subcommittee weekly meeting, and it will provide a detailed coverage for the ONAP Data Model, mostly about: - evaluation

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity

Both ONF and MEF has been involved in ONAP service modeling discussion, no conclusion has been made yet. From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 10:54 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.or

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity

: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity Sorry about reaching out to the entire list, but I have a time critical bit of info I need for a Board presentation. I need a quick one-sentence summary of current participation for both ONA and MEF. Looking for a high-l

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity

Sorry about reaching out to the entire list, but I have a time critical bit of info I need for a Board presentation. I need a quick one-sentence summary of current participation for both ONA and MEF.  Looking for a high-level summary, not low level details. Thanks! Best Regards, -kenny

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Zhipeng Huang Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 1:10 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc ; GUPTA, ARUN Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure] Hi Arun and all, Sorry for the late response, I just want

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

iki page, we will limit one point > discussion time during our next call. > > > > Thanks a lot > > > > DENG Hui > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *GUPTA, ARUN > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 22

[onap-discuss] [modeling]cancelation of service IM call this week

Hi all, Since people are focusing on R2 integration testing and with no new input to the discussion, this week'service IM call is cancelled. Thanks, Lingli ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailm

[onap-discuss] [modeling] R3 Data Model discussion - date and time set

Hi all, The voting poll (https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33064908) for the R3 Data Model discussion time is now officially closed. The time slot chosen by the vast majority is: Monday, 7:00am PST; 9:00am CST; 10:00am EST; 14:00 UTC; 17:00 Israel; 20:30 India; 22:00 Beijing T

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Usage of Stereotypes in Modeling and Deprecating Attributes

1) Usage of Stereotypes in Modeling I took an action item from this morning's resource modeling call to write up how stereotypes are used in modeling. The information can be found here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Stereotypes Please take a few moments to familiarize yourself with this mate

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of GUPTA, ARUN Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 11:20 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure] The Wiki pages for Cloud Infrastructure Modeling in general: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33065694 and for

[onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180522 meeting minutes of modeling subcommittee

Hello all This week has many follow-ups, so we post the meeting minutes again in the list, thanks https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+1HModeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes please help to cast your vote on the new meeting time of Resource IM and DM respectively asap thanks a lot

[onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

The Wiki pages for Cloud Infrastructure Modeling in general: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33065694 and for Cloud Aggregation Classes: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cloud+Infrastructure+Aggregate+Representation+Classes The presentation used in today's (Tuesday May 22) Mod

[onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

The Wiki pages for Cloud Infrastructure Modeling in general: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33065694 and for Cloud Aggregation Classes: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cloud+Infrastructure+Aggregate+Representation+Classes The presentation used in today's (Tuesday May 22) Mode

[onap-discuss] [modeling][sdc]New periodic Data Modeling meeting - links fixed

Hi all, We are spinning off a new weekly modeling call with a special focus on the Data Model discussions: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/%5BModeling%5D+Resource+Data+Model+Discussion Please let us know your preference on the call day and time: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageI

[onap-discuss] [modeling][sdc]New periodic Data Modeling meeting

Hi all, We are spinning off a new weekly modeling call with a special focus on the Data Model discussions: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/%5BModeling%5D+Resource+Data+Model+Discussion

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Help on ONAP R2 Data Modeling verification

Thanks Deng That is surprising. Can each company with strong interest in this offer one coder please. This is a key activity and can’t be coded by 2 coders. This will impact our Casablanca release. Thank you all!! Mazin Sent through AT&T's fastest network On May 2, 2018, at 6:08 AM, denghui

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Help on ONAP R2 Data Modeling verification

Hi Denghui and Victor, Serban Jora (j...@research.att.com) and I can help with some of these verification tasks. Can you please reach out to us separately and provide a bit more detail? The jira tickets explanations are minimal. Thanks, Rittwik From: onap-tsc-bou

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Help on ONAP R2 Data Modeling verification

Hello all We have more than 10-20 companies regularly to talk about ONAP modeling , but unfortunately we have only 2 coders contributing ONAP R2 modeling code contribution. Victor has worked on this more than 1 week, and felt that he can’t do such huge work just by himself, so he has create bel

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Next week modeling call is cancel due to chinese holiday

Hello all Next Monday and Tuesday are Chinese holiday, so we cancelled Tuesday call, service/resource call will continue on Wednesday and Friday. Fortunately we have two companies are contributing the code for our release 2 modeling DM. I will send the request to LF to cancel it. Thanks DENG

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Request for last call for comment on WAN service proposal

Hi DENG Hui- Do you want the comments on the wiki page or via email. Sorry, it wasn't clear to me. -Jessie On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:57 PM, denghui (L) wrote: > Hello all > > > > Per service call discussion yesterday, this is 2 weeks call for comment on > WAN service proposal > > https://wi

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Request for last call for comment on WAN service proposal

Hello all Per service call discussion yesterday, this is 2 weeks call for comment on WAN service proposal https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/WanService the discussion minutes and slides for related discussions and calls are documented here https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=283814

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for class vs data type issue

Dear All, Dear Mr. Chairman, Because I have not received any concrete comments on the class vs data type issue either on the wiki or in the call. I would like to request a last call for this issue to make progress. If there’s no comments until next Tuesday, I would like to adopt the proposal wr

[onap-discuss] [modeling] About this week's resource IM call

Hi All, As suggested in the modeling subcommittee call, I have requested to add resource IM call into the ONAP calendar (shown below). However, as I have sent the invitation of this week’s call before, I would like to use the previous invitation for this week’s meeting, and transfer to the new

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Patterns of translating IM into TOSCA-based DM

Hi all, For your information, there is a new page in the wiki to discuss best practices for translation of IM into the TOSCA-based Internal Data Model for R3. Your feedback and contributions are welcome. Regards, An

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion Apr 27 - Invitation

resource IM discussion call.\n\nMeeting Information:\nMeeting room: h ttps://zoom.us/j/9117271979\nTime: Friday 9pm~10pm China\, 9am~10am US Eas tern\n\nCurrent Agenda:\n-deprecate legacy HPA related attributes\n\nBR\,\ nXu\n\n SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP Resource IM

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Cancelation of service discussion call on April 18th

Hi all, The service discussion call today is cancelled due to the conflict to China SDNNFV conference. Please post your contribution to the wiki and we will use email discussion until next week. Thanks, Lingli ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion Apr 20 - Invitation

/DW/Class+vs+Datatype+Categorization if you have any feedback on this issue.)\nIf you have any proposal for the call\, please comment o n https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Resource+IM+Call+2018-4-20 or s ending emails\, thanks.\n\nBR\,\nXu\n\n SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:[onap-discuss][modeling

[onap-discuss] [modeling] this week modeling call will be cancelled

Hello modelers Lots of people reach me that due to China SDN/NFV conference, we would like to cancel this week regular weekly modeling call 1) For service call, #1 will be started this Friday 2) For resource IM, please help to comment on the link: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cla

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Invite feedback on R3 DM proposal

Hello Modelers, In order to get sufficient discussion in the beginning other than before the deadline, we would like to invite each company to feedback to Anatoly on your view. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Why+does+R3+need+multiple+DMs Please either send your view in this wiki page or send t

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource Information Model - Class vs Datatype Categorization call for comments

Dear All, Here's a call for comment on the class vs datatype categorization issue of the resource IM. Current resource information model (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version) has all objects categorized as "class". There are comments stating that some of them shoul

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion - Invitation

://zoom.us/j/9117271979\nTime: 9pm~10pm China\, 9am~10am US Eastern\ nAgenda:\n1) “class” vs “data type” discussion\n2) R3 IM kickoff: collecting requirements and discuss future plan\n\n\n SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion - Invitation DTSTART;TZID=W

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data Model Chain in R3

Hi all, The presentation about having multiple DMs in R3 has just been published at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Why+does+R3+need+multiple+DMs. You are all invited to comment. Regards, Anatoly Katzman ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discus

[onap-discuss] [modeling] WAN IM follow up disscusion

Hi, Nigel WAN IM proposal has be updated : https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Wan+Descriptor+IM+proposal , could you please review it if convenient and thank you for your further suggestions. We anticipate an updated version next week and present it to the community for a la

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

Joel Halpern of Ericsson is leading the project. I think that suggestions should go to him directly. In the meantime, when we get a chance, some of the members of the IM Guidelines group will post to ONAP some of the more serious problems with the existing IISOMI guidelines. This is why we are rew

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

If you have any questions or comments regarding MEF's use of modeling guidelines, or modeling techniques, please let me know and I will communicate your request to the MEF committee chairs and the CTO. -Jessie On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:15 PM, John Strassner wrote: > Actually, the MEF is NOT usin

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

Actually, the MEF is NOT using these guidelines anymore, mainly due to the errors with respect to UML interpretation and the restrictions placed on what UML artifacts can be used in a model. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM, jessie jewitt < jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote: > You are correc

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

You are correct that it is not an "industry standard" like an IEEE spec. It is an informal agreement by industry players to use the same UML Modeling Guidelines. The ONF, ETSI, and MEF use these guidelines, even though you personally may choose not to do so. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:42 PM, John S

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

I'm sorry, but IISOMI is NOT an "industry standard". It is an "informal agreement" that has some consensus among some parts of the industry. In fact, it contains a number of incorrect conclusions about what UML is and is not, and greatly limits the power of using UML constructs. John On Wed, Apr

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

Hello Hui and Lingli- I've noticed that the modeling guidelines defined here: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003072 do not specify that we should be following the industry defined UML Modeling Guidelines (IISOMI 514) and Papyrus Guidelines (IISOMI 515) defined here: http

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Classes vs. Datatypes

I agree (have not checked every one, but makes sense to me) From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 2:01 PM To: SCAGGS, KEVIN ; MAYER, ANDREW J Cc: yangxu (H) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [modeling] Classes vs. Datatypes The following

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for ONAP NS IM

27, 2018 3:50 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for ONAP NS IM Hello modelers, According to last Sunday discussions, it seems that NS IM become more stable, here is one week call for ONAP NS IM. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/NetworkService After t

[onap-discuss] [modeling] [so] R2 ONAP MultiVim Plugin

Hi Byung and I have noticed that Cloudify has implemented the enclosed TOSCA concrete node type definitions in R2 SO Multivim plugin for deploying VNF resources on Openstack. The ONAP wiki is here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TOSCA+Service+Orchestration%3A++Paris+Dev+Face+to+Face+Sept.+25%2C

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Friday morning modeling workshop venue

Hello all Venue: Intercontinental Los Angeles Downtown, sponsored by Linux Foundation Network Echo Park Meeting Room 5th floor Date: March 30th Time: 8am-1pm Lingli will post agenda later today, Thanks a lot DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list ona

[onap-discuss]   [modeling] about the NSD in SDC

add the mail title. 原始邮件 发件人：张茂鹏10030173 收件人：ml6...@intl.att.com tg8...@intl.att.com 抄送人：onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 日 期 ：2018年03月29日 13:15 主 题 ：[onap-discuss] [modeling] ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https

[onap-discuss] [modeling]

Hi Michael, Tal NSD definition has been already in the SDC code. Here is the link: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=sdc.git;a=tree;f=catalog-be/src/main/resources/import/tosca/nfv-types/NSD;h=bf5cabb52dc41025f4708c7c095e304196e7e6a6;hb=HEAD. How to design the NSD as resourc

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for ONAP NS IM

Hello modelers, According to last Sunday discussions, it seems that NS IM become more stable, here is one week call for ONAP NS IM. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/NetworkService After this call, this version will move into the clean version. Thanks a lot DENG Hui

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion minutes for Mar 25 available on the wiki

Hi guys, Thanks for attending the service modeling session as part of ONAP Sunday afternoon modeling session in ONS 2018 (25 March 2018) . The meeting related information including agenda, minutes are ava

[onap-discuss] [modeling]modeling call this week is cancelled

Hello modelers, This week call is cancelled , thanks DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling spec timeline changed

Hello modelers We had twice presentations from Kevin in Model/Arc about proposing modeling spec coming out early as below link: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/ONAP%20Process%20Proposed%20Updates%202018-03-21.pdf?api=v2 https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+ONAP+Release+Pr

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Sunday afternoon modeling session in ONS 2018 @ Sun Mar 25, 2018 1pm - 7pm (PDT) (denghu...@huawei.com)

This is the bridge for remote presenter on Sunday. Thanks DENG Hui BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 15.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Romance Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16011028T03 RRULE:FREQ=YEA

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

jd); HAY, AARON; RICE, CHRISTOPHER; Eli Williams (eliwill); MONTELEONE, CHRISTINA; MAYER, ANDREW J; pierre.ly...@keysight.com<mailto:pierre.ly...@keysight.com>; POLSTON, STEVE; Alex Daltrini (adaltrin); Neil Thayer; Karin Arnold; zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.c

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

unikowski; Vul, Alex; Casem Majd (Cas Majd); HAY, AARON; RICE, CHRISTOPHER; Eli Williams (eliwill); MONTELEONE, CHRISTINA; MAYER, ANDREW J; pierre.ly...@keysight.com; POLSTON, STEVE; Alex Daltrini (adaltrin); Neil Thayer; Karin Arnold; zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling]

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

1T033146Z DESCRIPTION: \n\n \n\n_\nFrom: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> On Behalf Of Lingli Deng\nSent: 2018年3月21日 11:30\n To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org \nCc: 'Rittwik Jana' >\ nSubject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

Hi all, Welcome to join us for the service modeling discussion thread next week. Here is the proposed meeting logistics: Start Time: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21 Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Proposed Agenda * Agenda bashing * R2 St

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Features missing in Onap TOSCA Resource IM/DM

Hi Guys, After looking at onap tosca resource IM(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version) DM(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile), it seems to me that several features are missing. I'm asking to add these missing features in our on

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 10 am US eastern (10 pm Beijing) Tue, March 13

Hi guys, Thanks for attending the service modeling call earlier today. The meeting related information including agenda, minutes and recordings are available on the wiki now: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Service+IM+Discusssion+Calls Cheers, Lingli -Original Appointment---

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call tomorrow

Reminder, the US entered Daylight Savings Time yesterday. For those outside the US, tomorrow’s modeling call will start one hour earlier. 2100 Beijing time DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mail

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #10 invitation

//zoom.us/j/9117271979\n\n DTEND;TZID="China Standard Time":20180316T220000 DTSTAMP:20180312T095551Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180316T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180312T095622Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:15 SUMMARY;LAN

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Venue of ONAP modeling Sunday afternoon workshop has been finalized

Hello all As you have already know that, we will have Sunday afternoon and Friday morning two days workshop https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Sunday+afternoon+modeling+session+in+ONS+2018 https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Friday+morning+modeling+session+in+ONS+2018 Please everybody help t

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 1:26 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc ; Rittwik Jana Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design Hello- I don't remember this being an action out of the mode

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello all Currently, only 1,2,3,5 have been take, many thanks to Ericsson/Intel/Huawei we still missing contributor for 4,6,7, R2 DM spec aligned with IM need to be finalized before next Tuesday modeling call. Please help to volunteer Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: denghui (L) Sent: Thursday, Ma

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 10 am US eastern (10 pm Beijing) Tue, March 13

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 16.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ATTENDEE;

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 10 am US eastern (10 pm Beijing) Tue, March 13

Hi all, Welcome to join us for the service modeling discussion thread next week. Here is the proposed meeting logistics: Start Time: 10 am US eastern (10 pm Beijing) Tue, March 13 Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Agenda (TBD) The existing discussion t

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello- I don't remember this being an action out of the modelling committee meeting yesterday. How does it compare to the action item from another meeting that Alex, Thinh, Anatoly and myself took to work on the IM to DM model mapping, and the mappings that have already been proposed (and comme

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello Andrei, It's really hard to keep the synchronization between SDO and OSS, they have different paces, ONAP is working for Release time frame restriction. Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com] Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 8:59 PM To: denghui (L) ;

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello Deng Hui, Andy, As the topics 1 - 6 are more or less covered (or in the process of finalizing) by the ETSI GS NFV-SOL001 so it would not be a big deal to re-use the TOSCA constructs from there. However the topic # 7 is not covered (and not planned to be covered) by SOL001 so to my under

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello all As agreed in modeling subcommittee meeting, we need to update the onap types of the data model to reflect the agreements reached in information model. It's huge work to achieve the goal, in order to accelerate, 7 separate tasks have been created based on the current IM. We encourage i

<    1   2   3   4   >