Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Well, contributions come in many forms, not just patches. Note too
> that almost all the requested features had nothing to do with core
> postgres, which is what this list is about
Well, as a driver developer I can tell you that the core teams attitude
toward driver driven
Tom Lane wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Before you explode at me (again :), I'm not arguing that you can do
>> binary based calculations of decimal numbers without having rounding
>> errors that come to bite you. I know you can&#x
Please note - I'm not trying to pick up a fight.
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Your source appears fairly ignorant of things-float.
That is possible, and even likely, however
> If they really are
> using decimal FP, it's easy to demonstrate that a lossless conversion
> to/from binary representation of simil
Tom Lane wrote:
> Okay, I spent some time googling this question, and I can't find any
> suggestion that any ARM variant uses non-IEEE-compliant float format.
> What *is* real clear is that depending on ARM model and a run time (!)
> CPU endianness flag, there are three or four different possibilit
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> "I want to use the binary format but I don't like what it does."
It doesn't do anything. The set of circumstances under which it is
useful has been limited, on purpose, and, as far as I can see, without
any good reason. Spending not much time (and I suggested to spend it
Csaba Nagy wrote:
> If you care about the +/- for +/-Infinity, you must also care about +/-0
> too, so you get the right type of infinity if you divide with 0... so +0
> and -0 are far from being semantically identical.
>
> Cheers,
> Csaba.
>
>
My suggestion accommodates that.
Shachar
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
>> This is not data given to store. It's data being exported.
>
> Data being exported has a funny way of turning around and being stored
> in the database again. It's kind of nice to know the damage d
Tom Lane wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> No, not unless you can make the case why this handles NaNs and
>>> denormalized numbers compatibly across platforms...
>>>
>>>
&
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Why the heck do the OLE DB specs care about the internals of the
> client-server prototocol? It is documented fairly clearly that text is
> the only portable way to transfer data.
>
Is it?
> Perhaps we need to expand this sentence in the docs: "Keep in mind that
> bina
Tom Lane wrote:
> Obviously, if you are transporting the dump across platforms then that
> may be an impossibility. In that case you use a text dump and accept
> that you get an approximation.
That's something that I've been meaning to ask about, but you all
seemed so sure of yourself. What you a
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sure it's "possible". Send a Parse command, ask for Describe Statement
> output, then specify the column formats as desired in Bind. Now this
> does imply an extra server round trip, which might be annoying if your
> client code doesn't have another reason to need to peek at Des
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> But sometimes, like now, PG puts me in an impossible position. You are
>> essentially telling me "you will get the numbers in an unknown format,
>> you will not have any way of knowing whether you got them in a strange
>> format or not, nor will you have any docs on wha
Tom Lane wrote:
> Binary format has other goals that are not always compatible with 100%
> platform independence --- that's unfortunate, sure, but it's reality.
>
Maybe the misunderstanding is mine. What are the goals for the binary
format?
Shachar
---(end of broadcast)
Tom Lane wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'll reiterate - the problem is not that PG is exporting the internal
>> ARM FP format. The problem is that the server is exporting the internal
>> ARM FP format when the server is ARM, and th
Tom Lane wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I've received a bug report on the OLE DB list, which I suspect is
>> actually a server bug. The correspondence so far is listed further on,
>> but, in a nutshell, user runs an OLE DB client on
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
>> Hi guys of the pgsql-hackers list.
>>
>> I've received a bug report on the OLE DB list, which I suspect is
>> actually a server bug. The correspondence so far is listed further on,
>> but, in
well enough to comment on floating point format there.
Julian Heeb wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh schrieb:
>
>> Julian Heeb wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Our acounting software can use the PostgreSQL OLE DB driver to access
>>> a postgre
1. Is this suspicion correct?
2. If so, how do I detect how much to subtract.
3. If not, what is the meaning of "4"?
Thanks,
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed up today's work? http://www.lingnu.com/backup.html
--
a lot of active projects anyways. Of
the three projects that had anything new to say in over a month, two
have just stated that they don't care about the rest of the info anyways.
To summarize, just give me read only access to the old project's data
and I'm set.
Shachar
--
Sh
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed up today's work? http://www.lingnu.com/backup.html
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Tom Lane wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In other words, it seems that I, as a client, needs to guess whether
postgres was compiled with or without "HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP".
No, you need to inquire of the value of the "integer_datetimes"
param
DB in the near past. I strongly recommend upgrading, especially
prior to filing any new bug reports.
The new version can be obtained from
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/oledb/download/download.php.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed up
ncoded in the same format as it was compiled with,
not stopping to ask what the other side was compiled with. Is this a bug
in postgres as well?
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed up today's work? http://www.lingnu.com/backup.html
uses pqlib's "exec with params" to pass
parameters around, and also to make sure that data is returned in binary
format. As a result, it requires PG version 7.4 and above. It may well
be that the answer is "It's irrelevant for our supported backends".
Sha
Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I don't know type 705 well enough to decide which would work best. If
it's guaranteed to be a validly encoded text string, then I'll just
put it in as DBTYPE_WSTR, and get it done with.
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Dave Cramer wrote:
Shachar,
I think with type oid 705 (unknown) it's safe to treat it as text.
Certainly better than punting.
Question is what DBTYPE to report it as. Options are DBTYPE_WSTR
(UTF-16 string, which means the input string must be a valid UTF-8
s
be a validly encoded text string, then I'll just put
it in as DBTYPE_WSTR, and get it done with.
On another note are you aware of any issues with transactions?
Specifically with using the dated autocommit mode ?
I'm not sure what dated autocommit is. What are the issues you are se
I'll probably add
code to handle all unknown types as BLOBs or something, but I cannot
give a time frame for that. I'm also not certain how helpful that would
be for most cases.
On the good news front, Version 1.0.0.17 is about ready to be released
(initial schema support). I am resuming
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I have a complaint from an OLE DB user that when he does "select
'a'", he gets an "unhanded type" error. Since OLE DB uses a binary
interface, it has to know about all variable types that pass through it.
The debug in
eturned type is
705, which is "unknown". My question is - what is "unknown" used for? Is
it important to support binary send and receives with this type? Does
postgresql know how to convert it to other types?
I was under the impression that 'a' would be "text". W
st.
In short, I may be missing something painfully simple here, but I don't
see the real need for a driver oriented backend communication library.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broa
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Parameters are only supported in plannable statements
(SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE; I think there is some hack for DECLARE
CURSOR these days too).
That's a shame.
Aside from executing prepared statements, parameters are also u
hen using the results.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
'm doing is:
create user $1 with encrypted password $2
Any idea why this is not working? Is it supposed to work? Trying to pass
only the password as a parameter does not work either.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/
-
pgfoundry
(http://pgfoundry.org/projects/sql2pg/). In particular, check out the
"varcharci" type, that has case preserving varchars. This may provide
you with a starting point for what you are trying to do.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.
ources
(8.0 beta 1). The makefiles available through the sources only compile
libpq and psql and friends, not the actual database. I have not tried
MSYS yet, but do I just run the configure script as usual?
Any help with any of these problems would be greatly appretiated.
Shachar
--
Sh
e width specifier into my type?
I'm not even sure what function is called in order to say that the type
needs a width specifier.
Many thanks
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Tom Lane wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yes, it can cast to varchar, but that doesn't help because there are no
varchar operators ;-). To resolve the operator, it has to promote both
sides to text, and you didn't offer a cast to text.
Tom Lane wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have defined a datatype called "varcharci", shamelessly yanking the
input, output, recv and send functions from varchar. This means (as far
as I understand things) that this type is binary compatible with varcha
nd that the cast from varchar to varcharci is "as assignment" anyways,
shouldn't postgres be able to do the cast implicitly?
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n for this?
Shachar
P.S.
This is PG 7.4 on Debian unstable, coming from the standard deb.
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
changing constraints of a type. Is it possible to define a domain that
will have the same defaults and constraints as the base type, but will
have different comparison functions? Will that provide me with what I need?
Many thanks,
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu
Robert Treat wrote:
On Sunday 06 June 2004 13:47, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi list,
A postgresql migration I am doing (the same one for which the OLE DB
driver was written) has finally passed the proof-of-concept stage
(phew). I now have lots and lots of tidbits, tricks and tips for SQL
Server
le of places (say,
hash computation and string compares), or would that entail making
hundreds of little changes all over the code? Is there anything in the
regression testing infrastructure that can help check such a change?
Many thanks,
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open
d. Are these correct?
Would adding "OID" to the rows returned by each "Select" call, and then
doing "update blah where oid=xxx" when I'm requested to update the row
sound like a reasonable stategy, in lieu of updateable cursors? Can
anyone suggest a better way?
Tom Lane wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also, has anybody checked what other versions are affected?
Nothing before 7.4, at least by the known implications of this issue.
Again, if we wait a while and let Ken keep running his analysis tool,
he might turn up other
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 10:46:00 +0300,
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Industry practices dictate that we do issue SOMETHING now. The bug is
now public, and can be exploited.
The description of the problem indicates that it can only be exploited
be on that list.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
build from. You are most welcome
to start anew if you don't like the structure.
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
CU if
you are admin. It makes installs more complicated, but see 2 for why
this will not be necessary.
2. Original suggestion talked about looking up at HKCU, and then (if not
found) at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
3. I doubt the same machine will require BOTH service and per-user
installation
Shac
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Comments?
What's wrong with the way it's done by everybody else?
Have hardcoded paths (determined at configure time), and allow override
using a config file. Have a command line option for saying where t
file with "Registry". That is usually
hardcoded for (depending on whether you want it changeable per-user)
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\\ (replace HKLM
with HKEY_LOCAL_USER if you want per-user config).
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
h
spect, however, that's precisely
what PostgreSQL is doing if one is not active. Assuming the OLE DB user
uses the Transaction interface, and does not send a "begin" command, I'm
capable of knowing whether I'm inside a transaction or not.
Joe
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Joe Conway wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I guess what I would like to suggest is for the thus far unused "select"
command in PLPGSQL to be used, in some way, to return values outside the
scope of the strict "returns" context. I guess out variables will also
be nice, but that
led parameters, and
return a rowset, please let me know. Best I came up with so far was to
create a temporary table for the out vars or the selects. I can then rig
the OLE DB to make it look as if the function returned that.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http
peful tone?)
I'm not 100% sure on this all, but that seems to be the point Tom and I
came to in our discussion, and neither of the two solutions seemed very
good at the time.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(e
etting, yes.
If you want per database setting, you only need to worry about the
shared catalogs
If you want server wide setting, you just create the catalogs with the
correct name, and get it over with.
That's why I said that per-session setting seems like too much trouble.
--
Shachar Shemes
e concensus was that the runtime part was aprox. four lines
where the case folding currently takes place. Obviously, you would have
to get a var, and propogate that var to that place, but not actually
change program flow.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Con
ets involved in very unusual cases.
That's why we are holding an open thread on the "how" in "hackers". I'm
assuming that once the "how" is sufficiently resolved, and the
implications understood, everyone can make a better decision on the "do
we at all&
/Downloads_terms.html), which the FSF define as "GPL
compatible" (http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html). Yet, the
X11 license requires an inclusion of a certain paragraph, which is not
mandated by the LGPL, and which gives permissions not granted by the GPL.
I'm confused.
-
roblem is that "lower" is defined in template1. If we don't
uppercase it when we create the database, the above won't work. Then
again, I'm fairly sure that the identifiers you placed as lowercase in
your database are not defined by template1.
In short, I don
. As such, maybe it's best to just
leave the data as is.
7. Column headers, however, will have to have a solution. A point still
open in current design.
I'm hoping this summary helps in furthering the discussion.
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://
a way to support both...
You are welcome to join the other leg of this thread, then. That one is
not CCed to advocacy, as it is 100% technical.
Robert Treat
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broa
an't help you there, unless you want to compile Postgres yourself.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Robert Treat wrote:
On Saturday 24 April 2004 01:23, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
PS: I resisted the temptation to SET THIS MESSAGE IN ALL UPPER CASE
to make the point about readability. But if you want to argue the
point with me, I'll be happy to do that for the rest o
;s just that I don't think this is a big issue, given the
fact that I don't think we intend to deprecate the lowercase folding any
time soon.
Shachar
Remove advocacy from the CC. I don't think it's related there any more.
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu
ving a lesser
quality driver to seeing ugly uppercase.
regards, tom lane
PS: I resisted the temptation to SET THIS MESSAGE IN ALL UPPER CASE
to make the point about readability. But if you want to argue the
point with me, I'll be happy to do that for the rest of the thread.
Yes, it
ails, fold lower. If succeeds, issue a
warning". This should allow programs that rely on the folding (such as
initdb) to be debugged during the transition period.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---
G to
standard compliency. I find these issues legitimate, though solveable.
Getting a "we prefer lowercase to the standard", however, means to me
that even if I write a patch to start migration, I'm not likely to get
it in.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu
at noone except me can
touch this project without removing the BSD code (or relicensing, but
I'm assuming here I accept your claim that I cannot relicense), except
me. Creating free software with conflicting licenses code is legal but
highly recommended against.
regards, tom lane
Shachar
at the point where uninitialized and initialized data are merged into a
single operation.
In fact, that may help with getting the errors closer to the place where
the actual problem resides. Then again, it may cause it to generate way
more false positives.
--
Shachar Shemesh
L
ttp://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html), which is interpreted by the FSF
to be GPL compatible
(http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html#X11License). This means
I'm defnitely missing something here. What, however?
Oh, or is the license in my link the NEW X11 license, known to be
from it, valgrind will complain. If all you do
(as in your example) is copy it around, and then copy it some more, it
will not.
Yes, it does keep "uninitialized" bits over your registers. Brrr.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
ht
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Can anyone shed more light on this point for me? Am I misreading
something? If it is possible to put code into an LGPL project, what
is the requirement?
You have to display the PostgreSQL license text in the source code or
the binary
Neil Conway wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 09:19, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
The license given in the web link you mention seems to mandate all
related work to be under the same license, which is nowhere near what
BSD means.
What license text do you think implies this?
-Neil
provided
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I suspect valgrind is complaining because XLogInsert is memcpy'ing a
struct that has allocation padding in it. Which of course is a bogus
complaint ...
As far as I remember (couldn't find modern documentation on the
matter) Valgrind is resita
for the explicit reason of avoiding the problem you describe.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if y
Tom Lane wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In particular, the front page claims that PostgreSQL is under the BSD
license. The problem is that there are two.
We use the one shown in the COPYRIGHT file in the top directory of the
source tree, which is also availab
reSQL license is
LGPL compatible, or what I need to do in order to use it. I have already
placed copyright notices copied from the file I copied the actual code
from, but do I need to do anything else? Is it at all possible to do
this relicensing?
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open S
fined type, for
porting from SQL Server. Where should I place these?
Inside the PG source seemswrong. Then again, gborg does not seem to
be accepting new projects at the moment. I can put them on
sourceforge/berlios etc, and ask for a link, if you like.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
L
t;" section.
Current status is "extremely preliminary, though somewhat working". It
is being actively developed, however, so I'm hoping to see rapid
improvements there.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingn
Joe Conway wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'll stress again - I don't mind doing all the work associated with
any once of the above choices. All I'm asking is that we agree on
which one will be best for this project. As far as I'm concerned,
Choice 2 involves the least a
uble. This is
a database system, not a C programming language. People who need the
extra range can use the NUMBER type. I also don't see the use for a
signed 1 byte type - its range is too small in both direction.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http:/
e)
into postgres.
If this is impossible, would it be at least possible to reserve an OID
for this type, and decide what it actually is later? If that would be
possible, I can go on, in the mean time, with my development. The
problem is that pglib really has no way of identifying the types
s available for.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there a datatype that means "one byte"?
You might be able to use the "char" type (note the quotes). I am not
sure how well it will cope with storing zeroes (nulls) though.
regards, tom lane
Hm
of the variable
is important beyond it's legal range).
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 February 2004 14:10
To: Dave Page
Cc: Hackers; PostgreSQL OLE DB development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends
I would, except I'm not sure how many qu
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 February 2004 13:18
To: Hackers; PostgreSQL OLE DB development
Subject: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends
Would adding "OID" to the rows returned by each &quo
lp me out with this, or at least
forward this request to your mail admin.
Many thanks,
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet,
Tom Lane wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
... This is a problem, as merely preparing a command is
not enough to get the returned rows information.
Sure it is, if you are using the V3 protocol (new in 7.4).
See the Describe message types.
regards, tom lane
mmand with "where 0" appended
to it. Neither solutions seem very practical or good performance wise.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you se
said, there doesn't appear to be any old code to maintain. I have
requested a new project on gborg (pgoledb), but getting the current name
is just as good. If the current code is somehow recovered, I'll be more
than glad to have a look at it. After all - I don't INSIST on writing
fr
William ZHANG wrote:
"Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas Pflug wrote:
I wonder if this could be implemented as a wrapper around libpq. This
way, the OLEDB driver would benefit from a proven piece of software.
Regards,
Andreas
That&
dead. Should I open
another one?
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining colum
native Windows port of libpq at the time?).
My reason is actually that I'm not a great postgres hacker, and I would
rather rely as little as possible on internal structures and things that
are likely to change in the future.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Ope
connect to
Postgresql. If anyone else has written code, was contemplating writing
code, has access to the gborg project, or is otherwise interested,
please let me know.
I'm hoping to be able to do some sort of preliminary release in about a
week.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Ling
lation - a performance/memory tradeoff), but I would really prefer a
true solution to the problem.
My question is this - how terrible will it be if we did not lock each
individual column, but instead locked entire rows (as Tom suggested in
the begining of this thread)?
Shach
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm being alow here
alow->slow
Just wanted to avoid confusion.
--
Shachar Shemesh
Open Source integration consultant
Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/
---(end of broadcast)---
T
tion of
whether they have any claim on Posix utilities anyhow, or whether a
commercial application using PGSQL should be considered derived work of
it, mean to me that there is no problem in distributing a commercial app
that uses Cygwin PostgreSQL.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemes
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
