>2011/7/13 Jim Pingle mailto:li...@pingle.org>>
>On 7/9/2011 9:17 PM, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
>> The system is and has been set to -8 (I am Pacific Daylight Time, USA), and
>> hasn't been re/booted since the first boot on that build--and I >have
>> report
>On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Dimitri Rodis
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have my log set to show newest on top, and the log is "mostly" in
>>> order, but notice how there are some entries tha
" in order, but
notice how there are some entries that are in the middle of this screenshot
that are "newer" than everything else. (The problem is that Jul 8 15:12:29 has
not yet happened in my time zone, it is only shortly after 10AM here..)
[cid:image001.png@01CC3D56.B846EF00]
debugging/troubleshooting purposes if someone needs it since I have a spare
unit that I can boot the CF on..
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
until I can get a hardware sample to
Pyun. I don't think the support for 8139C+ will ever be 100% (I'd take 99%)
until this happens.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-
To unsubscrib
h a Realtek 8139C+ chip on it (like a Firebox
X500, X700, X1000, or X2500) that is what it's going to take to fix the Realtek
driver problem.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-
To
2.0-RC1 (i386)
built on Mon Mar 14 17:33:11 EDT 2011
Log sorting is set to newest first, however, the log sort is "randomly
incorrect" (see screen snippet). I didn't see anything in redmine, thought I
would check here first..
[cid:image001.png@01CBF837.8BDBAAF0]
Dimitri
>No, those are RSTs and FINs coming after the state is closed, expected
>behavior.
>http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Logs_show_%22blocked%22_for_traffic_from_a_legitimate_connection,_why%3F
Ok, but unless I'm misunderstanding, I am not logging packets blocked by the
default rule, so why would th
rule right
beneath that rule that explicitly blocks outbound SMTP from all IP addresses on
the subnet, and I have logging turned on for that rule. So, the rule beneath
the one that should be triggered is being triggered instead.
Is there a Bug/Race condition in rule evaluation??
Dimitri
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Dimitri Rodis
wrote:
> After an upgrade to this morning's snap, I received the following
> after the upgrade/reboot (it's what's on my PuTTY atm):
>
>
>
> Syncing OpenVPN settings...done.
>
> Starting syslog...d
After an upgrade to this morning's snap, I received the following after the
upgrade/reboot (it's what's on my PuTTY atm):
Syncing OpenVPN settings...done.
Starting syslog...done.
Configuring firewall..done.
Starting PFLOG...done.
Setting up gateway monitors...done.
Synchronizing user settings
it never showed the file
server's ip address at all. It almost looks like the host list is only looking
at traffic directed to pfSense itself as opposed to through that particular
interface.
Anyone else confirm?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
Any reasons why this might be?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
otice that your stuff
doesn't work ;)
Anyone else see this?
Dimitri Rodis
http://www.integritasystems.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Com
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Dimitri Rodis
wrote:
> pfSense 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Wed Jan 19 12:45:14 EST 2011
>
>
>
> When I try to use an alias in the Internal IP field (suppose the alias
> was
> ) I receive the following error upon saving (or trying
anged. I did not try using an Alias in
the External Subnet IP field, although it is RED also.
Anyone else see this?
Dimitri Rodis
http://www.integritasystems.com
>Hi Everyone,
>
>Just loaded a nanobsd image of pfSense 2.0 onto a CF card for Alix board. I
>have only used v1.2.3 in the past and I never used the internet to upgrade it.
>In fact, I am under the impression >that v1.2.3 is the latest and there are no
>upgrades to it.
>
>I am wondering if there
The last 3-4 upgrades that I've done using nano are not automatically rebooting
after the upgrade is complete, even though it says it is on the console (and
last night I left it to see if it eventually would, and it did not and I logged
in this morning). The following is literally a cut and past
>Hi,
>
>I upgraded 2.0 B5 last night and it seems to have broken the web Gui. All my
>tunnels are up and the command line works fine.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--
>Mark Street, D.C., RHCE
>Chief Technology Officer
>Alliance Medical Center
>(707) 433-5494
If you reboot does the WebGUI start working again?
>On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
wrote:
>>
>> I do not know a lot about Hyper-v but in VMWare for instance you can
>> block frames with 'faked' mac-addresses. Probably you hit the same
>> problem as CARP-packets have MAC-addresses 'not real' but specifically
crafted.
>
>I'm sur
On 10-11-15 09:22 PM, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
I recently migrated a pfSense virtual machine (version 1.2.2) that was
running flawlessly on Hyper-V (first release) with 2 additional CARP IP
addresses on the WAN interface for about 16 months. Over the weekend, I
migrated that virtual machine over
ck to the original Hyper-V (non-R2) host.
Any ideas on why CARP IPs wouldn't work on Hyper-V R2? Is there something
since 1.2.2 that might change this?
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
If the port forwards are on the WAN addresses themselves, to my knowledge
they will not fail over. My understanding is that all "addresses" (and port
forwards) that you intend to survive a failover must be on CARP addresses.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Dimitri Rodis
> wrote:
>>
>> I would really like to see this work reliably at some point. From what I can
>> tell, this problem is not limited to just Fireboxes, >it is on pretty much
>> all NICs that have
>> RTL8139C+ chi
>On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Hans Maes wrote:
>>
>> Although it is definately related to the type of NIC's in the watchguard
>> boards, I'm still not completely convinced this is 100% a hardware problem
>> since the Watchguard Linux OS seems to work just fine on it. Sounds more
>> like a Free
Stupid question--- the pfSense box is (still) the gateway address for your
network, right?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: apiase...@midatlanticbb.com [mailto:apiase...@midatlanticbb.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:42 PM
My understanding is that Giant lock is gone from the FreeBSD network stack
in 8:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/arch/2009-04/msg00075.html
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:bill.marque
do), and authenticated clients get put on
vlans that can freely access the internet. In your case, you might just need
to use FreeRADIUS along with some switch ACLs (in the "Additional RADIUS
Options" box) to allow/limit/prevent internet access.
Hopefully that made some sense. It
I'm drafting a reply. Be done shortly.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Dressel [mailto:tjdres...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 11:11 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive P
about
15 months now--still running on 1.2-release. If you have some good managed
switches, that's the way to do it IMHO.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:aoz@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 3:16
.php/topic,15669.0.html
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Schmidlkofer [mailto:joshl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 8:23 PM
To: support@pfsense.com; j...@pax2cargo.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support]
one person has
reported that 2.0 gives him timeouts (see
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=15669). I don't yet have an
explanation as to why I get timeouts in 1.2.3 and not in 2.0, but I'm
working on figuring out why.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasy
Tim,
See http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=15669 if you have issues with
the Firebox. I'm collecting as much data as I can from those that are having
issues.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto
ent."
I'd use pfSense any day of the week over ISA, even if it meant they had to
use credential prompts.
Bottom line: if eliminating credential prompts is an absolute must, ISA can
do it for sure. pfSense, not yet ;)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
he captive portal, and have
the "current" windows logon credentials automatically pass to the captive
portal, which is currently not possible with pfSense-- ISA Server is the only
thing I know of that does this.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-
just may not know about it).
With respect to ISA, there is a client installation (aka Firewall Client)
that is required to make the authentication transparent--without it, it
would work just like pfSense would-- with RADIUS against AD, and the user
would have to enter credentials manually.
Dimitri
Forum link:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,15669.0.html
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 11:33 AM
To
produce it, and Pyun can
fix it.
Thanks to all that have helped, and thanks to those that are willing to
test!
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
<http://www.integritasystems.com> http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
There is a promiscuous mode on the vSwitches. That setting might need to be
adjusted.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:tnel...@fudnet.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 9:01 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
I put that in also-- like I said it didn't take effect until I rebooted. If
the rule wasn't there, it wouldn't matter how many times I rebooted :)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Kimmo Paasiala [mailto:kpaas...@
Good deal. I'll go to a later snapshot then.
Are upgrades between snapshots on embedded working at the moment, or should
I just reflash?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com]
The snapshot I'm using is dated April 1.. that's a couple of days after the
hackathon, I believe. Any idea when the xmlparse.inc from HEAD was removed?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...
ewhere, because like I said, I didn't
dupe the section myself.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:15 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2
Nope, using embedded.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:30 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support
x
Shouldn't only be in there once? Looks like it added
another section it each time I tried to change/save it,
and it's only using the last one.
Bug or user error?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems
user error?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
#x27;s something from the
ISP.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
From: Karl Fife [mailto:karlf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:51 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] pfSense gets RFC1918 address on WAN interface
after reboot
what version of pfSense you are using J
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
From: Nathan Eisenberg [mailto:nat...@atlasnetworks.us]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:10 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Using TCP
Hello,
meout
DOH!
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-----
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:dimit...@integritasystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:55 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] AW: Firebox X series w/ 1.2 and 1.2.2 iss
Woohoo! Didn't know you guys got this put in.. I'll test tomorrow or
Thursday as time permits.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Tues
x27;t appear to really have any issues..
then I added a second LAN and a dedicated sync interface for CARP and threw it
into production, and it lasted about 10 minutes before it melted down with
watchdog timeouts.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Ori
The feature you are looking for is Virtual IPs (or CARP IPs).
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Kipton Moravec [mailto:k...@kdream.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 9:08 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support
testing tomorrow.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 6:05 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] ACPI/APIC
#x27;t an "installer")? Doing a full install on
these fireboxes is pretty tough and requires some soldering (I believe) to
get a keyboard header working, not to mention that you have to get the board
completely out of the chassis to fit a video card on it.
Thanks Chris..
Dimitri Rodis
Integri
go
away (and a specially sized sticker than can cover up the Firebox X logo J)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Switched the cables a few times now. 3 different pre-fab cables (different
colors even!).
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Cotter [mailto:andrew.cot...@somersetcapital.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:35 PM
To
It looked that easy-- just wanted to be sure before messing with a
production set up!
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Paul Mansfield [mailto:it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 4:45 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re
FAQs, and
did some forum searches, but all of them discuss new installs, not adding
redundancy down the line (at least I couldn't find it if so).
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
rw 1 1" > /etc/fstab; echo "/dev/ufs/pfSenseCfg
/cf ufs rw 1 1" >> /etc/fstab
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
also categorically never used squid in one of these setups either.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:aoz@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:16 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support
Re-do what you did, but create a 2GB partition and try again. Leave the
other 6GB unused. I had this problem with an older PC and an actual 20GB
hard drive-- from what I understand, it has to do with the IDE-->CF adapters
and how well they support LBA/DMA modes, etc.
Dimitri Rodis
Integr
What kind of Virtual IP are you using? If you are using CARP addresses
(which is what I'm using), make sure your subnet mask actually matches your
WAN interface subnet mask.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:jason-lists
No love?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:dimit...@integritasystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:36 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] DNS Forwarder/Authoritative DNS Server
On one of my networks, I have 4 Windows server domain
OpenManage Server Administrator is what you're looking for.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 11:16 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Dell Hardware Monitoring - pfSense 1.2
were detected:
* A override already exists for this domain.
Is there a way that I can specify multiple DNS servers for a particular domain
suffix? You should be able to, IMO.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
<>
interface to use the corresponding private IPs? That way, you can
"use" all your public IPs, and each client will have one-- I've never used
1:1 in conjunction with captive portal, though, so what I just said may or
may not work.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-O
There are a ton of lines that look like this:
19004 stream tcp nowait/0nobody /usr/bin/nc nc -w 20
I guess we found the culprit then? Why is it using 20 as opposed to 2000?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto
I am using
1.2-RELEASE
built on Sun Feb 24 17:04:58 EST 2008
so it isn't an RC thing.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: digger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 4:04 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support
the -w param is in seconds according to
http://www.securityforest.com/wiki/index.php/Netcat_-_Basic_Overview
Any other ideas as to why connections would be dropping/timing out like
this?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:[EMAIL
st 6 times since you emailed
me last.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:44 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NAT Reflection States
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:40 PM, D
That's milliseconds, correct?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:38 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] NAT Reflection States
Thanks, Scott.
Dimitri
Thanks, Scott.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:36 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NAT Reflection States
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Dimitri Rodis
may be able to accomplish it.
Is there a particular reason you are trying to do a captive portal using a
bridge setup vs NAT?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2
ng out, long transfers between mail servers as
well).
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
(Cox uses these units in a metro SONET ring in Las Vegas).
I would rather not have to go get some junk 8 port managed switch just to
force a speed/duplex if it's possible to do in the pfSense config.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
different places
and it works quite well for us.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:43 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal enabling Ethernet Port Traffic
adCom, I got barely over 2Mb. Using the Intel, I got 9.5Mb.
What kind of NICs are in your pfSense box?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Ted Crow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:03 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Su
Adam,
This may sound strange, but you might want to load linux and vmware
server on the machine, and run pfSense virtualized until the hardware
support comes for your NICs. We run pfSense virtualized on Dell PE1800s,
PE2900s, and PE2950 servers all the time.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita
1. Did you install pfSense to the hard drive? (You need to for
packages)
2. Yes.. Go to the interfaces page and add it.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
From: Paul Peziol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:41 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject
at make
sense? Of course, this might be moot if there's a way to do it already..
Thanks guys..
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 5:32 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense
So really the peer IP option is there for folks who don't have a
dedicated interface, so that the pfsync traffic doesn't flood the
network, is that right?
So, in a 3-way config, do you always have to make configuration changes
on the "master"? Or can they be made on any of
ick with 2.
Any comments/suggestions appreciated!
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
to make either (or both) of the above scenarios
work using pfSense?
If not, if someone can give me a bump in the right direction, maybe I
can add it to the FreeRADIUS package and send that change to coreteam
also.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
Advanced Outbound NAT is what you're looking for. I don't know what the ports
are, but Advanced Outbound NAT is your friend.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 1:45 PM
To: support@p
That's weird that it would work with Xen and not with Virtual Iron-do
you happen to remember what version of Xen?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:51 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pf
the time using either MS VS or VMware internally and for
customers.
Any feedback appreciated..
Thanks--
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
Would a WRAP board be capable of NATting and Shaping a 10 megabit
symmetric connection without choking?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
Any workaround for getting DHCP to work on the WAN interface?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
Email just sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the captive portal changes.
I also emailed some freeradius package changes to coreteam back on 3/19.
Were those committed?
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Client IP: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 6:41 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
>
> If I wanted to dis
ccess, and if I am able to display that
information on the Captive Portal, I can just have them read it to me as
opposed to trying to step them through all of the hoops to get the mac
address.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
P on the WAN so if there's a quick workaround that anyone
knows of, that would be great.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:42 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [p
quick workarounds that I can use to get the WAN tab to show up (and
DHCP to work) on the WAN side?
I will submit the feature request shortly.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:4
ly
binding to my OPT1 and OPT2 interfaces. (There are 4 interfaces in the
machine total).
Bugs? Confirmation?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
The pfSense log viewer is broken?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:02 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package
On 3/6/08, Dimitri Rodis <[EM
Is there a better place to post/email this stuff? I don't seem to be
getting much in the way of responses. I have some nice additions to the
FreeRADIUS package that I want to submit, but I would like to add the
logging support before I do.
Trying to contribute!
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Inte
ndex.php/Special:Search/Setting_up_CARP_with_pf
Sense> in other pages or edit this page
<http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php?title=Setting_up_CARP_with_pfSense&act
ion=edit> ."
Where'd the CARP doc go?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
You need to use Manual Outbound NAT, and add a rule above the default
rule that has the source address of your machine, destination * *, and
then select the address of your WAN2 interface.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
From: Michael Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
rmatting so that when the data for that
field is subsequently retrieved, it looks the same way it did when I put
it in. Again, I didn't see anything in the CoreGUI docs that says
whether or not this is possible.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
WAN192.x.x.0/24 * * * (WAN) * NO
??
Or am I doing something wrong?
Congrats on a great release, by the way. :)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
