Is the Wicket Ajax Next Generation work going into 1.5?
Also, is there plans for an event bus, sort of like what you see in Jonathan
Locke's 26 wicket tricks source code? I've seen some really nice use of
event bus in GWT that I think Wicket could benefit from.
-Richard
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at
Also, this explains the example:
http://wicket.apache.org/exampleajaxcounter.html
2009/10/13 Richard Allen
> One way is to make your "Client" area a Wicket Panel and make your nav
> links extend AjaxLink (or AjaxFallbackLink), then add the Client Panel to
> the AjaxRe
One way is to make your "Client" area a Wicket Panel and make your nav links
extend AjaxLink (or AjaxFallbackLink), then add the Client Panel to the
AjaxRequestTarget in your implemented AjaxLink.onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
method. Note, the components you add to the AjaxRequestTarget must have
Comp
Now that Oracle bought Sun I wonder if JDev and Netbeans will cross paths.
A great free, cross-platform SQL tool is SQuirreL (
http://squirrel-sql.sourceforge.net/).
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Scott Swank wrote:
> I'm at best 50% DBA, by training. You end up with multi-step
> operations
To make Luther's point more explicit:
Wicket allows you to bundle everything a Wicket component needs (Java code,
HTML, CSS, images, etc.) into a single JAR and drop that JAR into the
WEB-INF/lib directory of any WAR, thereby making the JAR essentially
self-contained and reusable. The benefit this
If you are using war, then the maven-war-plugin will
automatically pick up the resources in src/main/webapp, which means you do
not have to configure that directory as a resource. Additionally, the
maven-resources-plugin automatically picks up resources in
src/main/resources, so you don't have to e
I believe you want to use ContextRelativeResource. See:
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/index.html?org/apache/wicket/resource/ContextRelativeResource.html
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Eyal Golan wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been looking for an answer but couldn't find it.
> We have a page that
Here is a good intro to OSGi:
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2008/jw-03-osgi1.html
Here is one framework for running Wicket in OSGi:
http://www.ops4j.org/projects/pax/wicket/
Here is a project that integrates Guice, Wicket, Hibernate, and OSGi:
http://code.google.com/p/modulefusion/
-Ric
I think when/if Eclipse supports nested projects, that might help.
Eclipse.org appears to be working on it for version 4. See:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=35973
I have also ran into problems with m2eclipse, however I have kept it
installed for use with small projects and for the
gs
> > fixed in 1.3.6 and 1.4, I find it hard to believe that anyone will
> > have the time and energy to do the mentoring as well. I don't have
> > that time and energy.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Richard Allen
The words of C. Bergstrom may have been poorly chosen, but he seems to have
the same goal of wanting Wicket to succeed and grow in popularity. Providing
harsh responses to users that, despite poor communication, are otherwise
excited about your project does not help to grow your community or get
ot
I did some reading and found that a "mentoring organization" for the GSoC is
considered "A group running an active free/open source software project".
That seems to imply a core committer would need to be involved. See:
http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2009/faqs.html#0_1_org_is_47611255748869
Sure.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:45 AM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If your on it Richard, could you put in the wicket merchandise shop aswell?
> cafepress.com/apachewicket
>
> 2009/2/19 Richard Allen
>
> > I like the wickethub.o
get better in the near future.
>
> francisco
>
> --
> http://wickethub.org
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Richard Allen
> wrote:
> > True. And I have no problem with that. I'll update the wiki with what I
> know
> > before the end of the we
True. And I have no problem with that. I'll update the wiki with what I know
before the end of the week.
However, I believe the good management of projects is in large part what
makes them a success.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Most
As a fairly new Wicket user, I find it moderately difficult and confusing to
find out what libraries/toolkits/frameworks/components/ide pluins/etc. are
available. There doesn't seem to be a central comprehensive list that is
regularly maintained. I feel like I have to look in several places, or do
That is very interesting. We have divided our web applications into
"modules", which are essentially mini WARs that are merged in the build
process to make the final deployed WAR. This allows us to share these
"modules" among various web applications, which helps with code reuse and
maintainability
See: http://code.google.com/p/wicket-ext/
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Hoover, William wrote:
> Is there any active projects for Wicket and ExtJS out there? I know of
> the one that used to be at wickettools.org, but it looks like a dead
> project (no updates for over a year). There was also
>
>
> What I don't like about Wicket is, that it is like writing normal Java
> applications - although rich clients applications are being replaced with
> web-based solutions and there is a fundamental difference between
> web-applications and normal java applications. If you have a java
> applicat
See: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/calling-wicket-from-javascript.html
Or more generally: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/ajax.html
-Richard
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Sniffer wrote:
>
> Thanx, I think I understand you, but still I'm not sure how to contribute
> client custom JS script wi
Using m2eclipse, you can also create a new Maven project using an archetype
from within Eclipse. Choose File > New > Maven Project > Next, and select
the archetype you want to use. See:
http://books.sonatype.com/maven-book/reference/eclipse-sect-m2e-create-archetype.html
-Richard
On Fri, Jan 16,
The only time I have seen something under the target folder added as a
source folder in Eclipse is if it specifically configured that way in the
section of the pom.xml. This is sometimes done if you are generating
sources or resources using something like JAXB, e.g.,
target/generated-sources.
-Ri
The url-pattern only supports using a wildcard at the end of the pattern
(e.g., "/myapp/*") or as a extension mapping prefix (e.g., *.do). See
section SRV.11.2 of the servlet specification, which can be downloaded from
here:
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr154/index.html
Therefo
American in Atlanta, Georgia, USA
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:57 PM, francisco treacy <
francisco.tre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> to know a little bit more of our great (and vast) community, i was
> just wondering if you're keen on sharing where you come from and/or
> where you work with wicket...
>
> f
For integration between Ext JS and Wicket, check out:
http://code.google.com/p/wicket-ext/
http://www.wickettools.org/index.php/extjs-integration
-Richard
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Cédric Thiébault <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Yes I was thinking about something like this but with m
Also, can you share what you get from Wicket that you don't get from GWT?
That would be useful for those who venture on this list considering GWT
versus Wicket.
Thanks,
Richard
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Richard Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> If ExtJS essentially give
If ExtJS essentially gives you what you want in the way of widgets, why not
look into integration of ExtJS and Wicket? In the near future, we will be
migrating our applications that use ExtJS to Wicket. There has already been
some work done in this area. See the following links.
ExtJS 2.2: http://
Brix (http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/). But it's new and not as feature
rich as something like Joomla.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Where is the Wicket solution!
>
What about just starting with Google Sites:
http://www.google.com/sites/overview.html ?
It's free and easy. Good for a static website, which sounds like what you
are looking to produce.
-Richard
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take a look at Joomla 1
I think a better solution is to make the browser's back/forward buttons have
the same effect as clicking on the 'Previous Question'/'Next Question'
buttons. If you put effort into making that work instead of putting your
effort into trying to disable the browser's back/forward buttons, then you
wil
have any suggestion where the project could be hosted? Google code?
> and any idea about the licence?
>
>
> Thank you, Paolo
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Richard Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > Paolo,
> >
> > Is this an open sou
Paolo,
Is this an open source effort? What version of ExtJS are you using?
If we were to choose to go with Wicket, we would be willing to contribute.
Thanks,
Richard Allen
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Paolo Di Tommaso <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a wicket-e
d the effort,
then that would help. The amount of work involved in integrating ExtJS 2.2
with Wicket is part of our new web framework evaluation criteria.
Thanks,
Richard Allen
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I though
/index.php/extjs-integrationm, which is version
0.1.0, published in February 2008.
Is the wicket-tools-extjs project in active development or was that project
abandoned? Is there any other significant work undergoing to integrate
Wicket and Ext JS?
Thanks,
Richard Allen
with sites using Wicket:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/sites-using-wicket.html
Also, the Wicket in Action forward by Jonathan Locke mentions that IBM,
TomTom, Nikon, VeriSign, Amazon, and SAS use Wicket.
Thanks,
Richard Allen
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:49 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Joel,
What advantage does Tapestry 5 provide you over Wicket for your front office
pages?
Thanks,
Richard Allen
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Joel Halbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're actually using two web frameworks in our application, depending on
> the type
applications we produce.
My colleague emailed the instructor from SpringSource and asked what he
thought of us migrating to Wicket instead of Spring MVC. His response is
below with my comments inlined. I would appreciate any convincing comments
from Wicket experts.
Thanks,
Richard Allen
Rich,
Some
37 matches
Mail list logo