Re: Group corruption problem after ARS7.1 patch2 SLM installation
Prashant Patil wrote: ** Dear All, Config: OS - Solaris10 DB - Oracle 10gR2 ARS 7.1 patch002 ServiceDesk 7.0.02 I am facing problems with Administartor and Sub Administrator Remedy groups. Whenever I login with Demo or appadmin I am receiving error: Error generating application list field content. (ARERR 1900) The system is basically unable to generate an application list for this user. If Administrator group permission is removed for Demo then not receiving any error, but I dont see any links on homepage either. The same is happening with appadmin user. I have to explicitly find open the required app config forms If I create a new fixed user and give Administrator or Sub Administrator group permissions to it then on login I am getting same error. I suppose these groups have got corrupted!!! The last change done on the system was installation of ARS 7.1 patch 002 and then SLM 7.0.03. http://7.0.03. Appreciate any help as I am facing problems with the superuser. Regards, Prashant __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ Hi,Prashant, The problem may be in your server settings.Go to Server Information--Configuration in User tool, check the server settings there for Default Home Page. Hope this helps Regards. *Sandeep Mahendra. Vyom Labs Pvt. Ltd. An ISO 2 certified company. Consulting | Outsourcing | Training || BMC Remedy BSM | ITIL Web : www.vyomlabs.com*_* *_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Group corruption problem after ARS7.1 patch2 SLM installation
Hi Prashant, The problem is with your server settings. Go to Server Information-Configuration in User tool, check the server settings for Default Home Page. This field should be set to Home Page from the drop down menu. Also, verify the syntax server_name.application_name in character field (ID 1576). Hope this helps Regards. Mahendra. Vyom Labs Pvt. Ltd. An ISO 2 certified company. Consulting | Outsourcing | Training || BMC Remedy BSM | ITIL Web : www.vyomlabs.com Prashant Patil wrote: ** Dear All, Config: OS - Solaris10 DB - Oracle 10gR2 ARS 7.1 patch002 ServiceDesk 7.0.02 I am facing problems with Administartor and Sub Administrator Remedy groups. Whenever I login with Demo or appadmin I am receiving error: Error generating application list field content. (ARERR 1900) The system is basically unable to generate an application list for this user. If Administrator group permission is removed for Demo then not receiving any error, but I dont see any links on homepage either. The same is happening with appadmin user. I have to explicitly find open the required app config forms If I create a new fixed user and give Administrator or Sub Administrator group permissions to it then on login I am getting same error. I suppose these groups have got corrupted!!! The last change done on the system was installation of ARS 7.1 patch 002 and then SLM 7.0.03. http://7.0.03. Appreciate any help as I am facing problems with the superuser. Regards, Prashant __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
Part of the problem is that there are no good answers to your questions. By default, we put things in the BMC_ComputerSystem class, unless it fits in somewhere else. So a Blackberry technically is a computer, just a tiny one. So is a calculator. Stuff that doesn't have a class and isn't anything remotely close to being a computer goes in as equipment. I'm wary of creating new classes unless there is a demonstrable need for it that is so strong we can't live without it. My users already hate that they have nothing in Asset Management to be able to search across the different classes (e.g. how do you find, in ITSM, all Assets located on the third floor of a certain building? The data exists, but there is no screen for users to pull that type of information.) New classes make the system harder to use. In fact, rather than creating a bunch of new classes, we've hidden some of the OOB classes to make the system easier to navigate. Shawn Pierson From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Pulsen Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:58 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions ** ahhh thanks, {module sarcasm} writeline (That's as useful as a 3 Inch ladder) {end sarcasm} So, what is the deal? Why can't anyone share their real world experience? I was hoping to see other points of view, with 3300 subscribers to this list, there has to be more than one. I'm not asking for Coca-Cola's secret formula, I'm just asking to see what others have done. Note to self, Add to module - Sharing = function (in short supply); goto {sarcasm}; Anyways, tried creating a new CI - I was able to create a new SuperClass and a new Class Name (associated with the superclass) Everything shows up fine in the CMDB Class manager Console, however nothing shows in the CI selection in the product category creation. Thanks, Kevin P. ** You have the answer either use an existing CI such as Computer System or Equipment or create a new CI to meet your needs. Their are add on CIs available if needed. -Original Message- From: Kevin Pulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:52 am Subject: Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions ** Hi Eli, ok, but where does a Blackberry fall into the ootb CI? where does a telephone, office desk, fax, etc fall into the ootb CI? These aren't defined and the product category creation wizard will not allow you to created a item without defining a CI. Thanks, Kevin P. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62 sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ%20 __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ Private and confidential as detailed here: http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the link, please e-mail sender. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: ADV:Sustainable IT Infrastructure Compliance
Great Post :) that remedy implementations will be for free On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Gidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** *Advertisement*: - Is your company looking for a sustainable mature support solution that offers a rock solid application? - Are you looking for a flexible service and support solution driven by data? - Are you paying way to much money for your current solution and support only to find that you are facing yet another upgrade ? - Is the cost of your current solution prohibiting growth and use of your applications in other Non-IT Departments? - Do you need support? Any of these questions hit home ? So, why deal with the other guy's solution and end up paying to much? If you haven't seen what we do and how we support you, then you are missing a free ride on the reality train. When a solution company puts a gun to your head and says, if you don't upgrade to the latest version you will lose support, does that instill confidence in your solution decision or what? Avoid the heart-burn ! Look at a solution that does not cost you an arm and a leg, NO Application Licenses, NO Application User licenses, NO Cost for a Development/Test server and 24x7 support that is unequalled. Yes, we are ITIL and SarBox compliant but at the end of the day it is really about creating a sustainable compliant solution for your company, are you ready yet? Whatever you are paying today it is not worth the headache you'll have tomorrow ! Find out what it is like to have a solution and a supplier that is genuinely interested in a business relationship based on your needs first. Grow your business with a flexible and dynamic solution geared to satisfying your customer's needs while creating the metrics you need to track operational performance. Ask yourself, is it time to give these folks a serious look? Learn why our customers genuinely believe in our solutions. Contact me off-list to schedule a webcast and a conference call to see what all the fuss is about. *Visit our website to see for yourself what we do: http://www.buoyantsolutions.net/ESS.htmlhttp://www.buoyantsolutions.net/essaw.htm * Regards…Gidd *Glidden L. Calden* *BUOYANT SOLUTIONS, INC.* Keeping business afloat ...in a Sea of Solutions Office ( *916.334.0599* FAX 4 *916.265.0112* Web 8 *http://www.buoyantsolutions.net* E-mail + *mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]* This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
** Thank you Shawn for your reply.My concern is, and this is what I have heard from BMC, when designing your Product categories, you need to think ahead to the design of the CMDB as well. It's all interrelated and affects reporting, trending analysis etc.I find it very difficult to design my Product categories and place all of the Non-Asset items in an 'OTHER' category, only to find out 2 years down the road our CMDB is messed up and mostly useless.Was this information from BMC a ploy to sell more Professional Services?I just hope to look enough ahead of the road to see the brick wall coming at me, that's all.Thanks again,Kevin P.** Part of the problem is that there are no good answers to your questions. By default, we put things in the BMC_ComputerSystem class, unless it fits in somewhere else. So a Blackberry technically is a computer, just a tiny one. So is a calculator. Stuff that doesn’t have a class and isn’t anything remotely close to being a computer goes in as “equipment”. I’m wary of creating new classes unless there is a demonstrable need for it that is so strong we can’t live without it. My users already hate that they have nothing in Asset Management to be able to search across the different classes (e.g. how do you find, in ITSM, all Assets located on the third floor of a certain building? The data exists, but there is no screen for users to pull that type of information.) New classes make the system harder to use. In fact, rather than creating a bunch of new classes, we’ve hidden some of the OOB classes to make the system easier to navigate. Shawn Pierson __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
ITSM 7 + Dedicated Solaris midtier Java Heap Size on Solaris?
I know this issue has been dealt with numerous times over the years. We're running IM 7.03, SLM 7.1 on ARS 7.1. We are getting the typical java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space errors - obviously we need to increase it. We are in a large environment and we're running dedicated Solaris mid-tier servers (ie, no Email Engine to compete for Java resources on this box). The default websphere settings for heap size are 50mb/256mb min/max. The only thing on these boxes is the mid-tier so we don't have to worry about memory usage beyond what we are doing. What is everyone else setting theirs to? I'm thinking 256mb/1GB min/max might be a good starting point but feedback would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. William Rentfrow, Principal Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] C 701-306-6157 O 952-432-0227 ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
Actually, it’s not that difficult to map your Product Categories to where they are useful for Asset Management, CMDB, and the rest of ITSM. From what I’ve seen with the CMDB and categorizations, it’s best to follow the K.I.S.S. method. I made a new class in CMDB 1 that ended up being a huge pain to maintain from the Asset Management side, so when we moved to 2, I imported those CIs as Computer Systems, and the users are much happier. If the end users don’t see any value in splitting things out into a lot of new classes, then there probably is none. With any application work, you really need to get the users to focus on the output, so you’re right in being concerned about reporting. We’ve found some issues with our Product Categories now that we’re implementing BMC Analytics. For example, instead of going with HardwareComputerDesktop we went something like PCDesktopStandard, but BMC Analytics has “Hardware” as a filter that comes out of the box, and with the route we went, it is harder to report on hardware assets. Still, had we created new Classes, such as Desktop, Server, and Laptop, our cleanup work would be a lot more difficult than just dealing with Product Categorizations. Also I think that a lot of what BMC does is a ploy to sell professional services, but that’s just a typical thing that all vendors do. Professional Services aren’t useful in coming up with processes and ways of laying out data that your company can use though. Sure, they can offer suggestions or tell you how it was done at another company, but if they drive the process you’re going to have lots of problems and the users will be unhappy. You have to get your primary users to step up and decide how they plan to use the system and have a clear process that you make the application fit in. BMC has a problem with ITSM 7 where they try to get companies to fit their processes around ITSM, when to be successful they need to do the reverse. Shawn Pierson From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Pulsen Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:35 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions ** Thank you Shawn for your reply. My concern is, and this is what I have heard from BMC, when designing your Product categories, you need to think ahead to the design of the CMDB as well. It's all interrelated and affects reporting, trending analysis etc. I find it very difficult to design my Product categories and place all of the Non-Asset items in an 'OTHER' category, only to find out 2 years down the road our CMDB is messed up and mostly useless. Was this information from BMC a ploy to sell more Professional Services? I just hope to look enough ahead of the road to see the brick wall coming at me, that's all. Thanks again, Kevin P. ** Part of the problem is that there are no good answers to your questions. By default, we put things in the BMC_ComputerSystem class, unless it fits in somewhere else. So a Blackberry technically is a computer, just a tiny one. So is a calculator. Stuff that doesn’t have a class and isn’t anything remotely close to being a computer goes in as “equipment”. I’m wary of creating new classes unless there is a demonstrable need for it that is so strong we can’t live without it. My users already hate that they have nothing in Asset Management to be able to search across the different classes (e.g. how do you find, in ITSM, all Assets located on the third floor of a certain building? The data exists, but there is no screen for users to pull that type of information.) New classes make the system harder to use. In fact, rather than creating a bunch of new classes, we’ve hidden some of the OOB classes to make the system easier to navigate. Shawn Pierson __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ Private and confidential as detailed here: http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the link, please e-mail sender.
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
** Well,I find it very disturbing from what Shawn stated - "Part of the problem is that there are no good answers to your questions"If the CMDB is really suppose to be the center of the Universe for ITSM, as it shows so well in the BMC literature, how can there be no real good answers?And if ITSM is suppose to be heavily ITIL influenced, how can any company use ITSM and state ITIL is not for me? Isn't that an Oxymoron? You really can't play a game with 15 rules, turn around and state there are no rules. Yes, ITIL is a framework (Pick and choose what you will), however without a foundation, it will collapse.Fine, I'll just turn up the heavy metal music and make my best guess where light bulbs fit into a CI when creating my product categories because not everything is a computer.Thanks,Kevin P.** Kevin: This situation is not a ploy to sell services. In its simplest form, the fact is that ITIL adoption is a complex endeavor, and if your organization is not willing to front-load their effort, then ITIL adoption may not be for them. Everything that Chris mentioned is important. Beyond what Chris wrote, it's necessary to understand the thought processes that lead him to write what he did. If your concern is future usability, then it is necessary to make your very best effort to anticipate what the future needs will be. Only after this process is grossly conlcluded can the CMDB be configured to meet the need. Along with this concept, understand that the expected need will never exactly match the actual future need, and so all you can do is make your best effort. Just like CQI, ITIL is a journey, not a destination. Less philosophically, my strongest recommendation to a customer is to not add any new attributes or classes unless there is a demonstrable business need for the new class/attribute. In my experience, customers are often suprised how many CIs can be tracked using simply the BaseElement class. My personal #1 rule of CMDB: unless there is a business need to consume the data, do not store the data in the CMDB. This rule extends to the Product Catalog, in that if there is no need to consume the data, then there is no need to categorize the data. Also, as Shawn mentioned, if you're using BMC's AM module, you have many restrictions in the day-to-day use of your data, so some of these questions, when pursued to their logical conclusion, will lead you to "it doesn't matter." Just My $0.02, --Phil __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
Asset Admin license removals
Hi all, I've got about a thousand people records that I need to remove the asset admin licenses they were previously assigned, and replace those with Asset Viewers instead. Any pointers greatly appreciated! ;) ARS 7.0.1 p002, ITSM 7.0.1 p003, CMDB 2.0.1 p002, SQL 2K, Win2K3 servers Dave Drake, Remedy Admistrator, Cerner -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Asset Admin license removals
Dave - not sure if this is correct in your version, but in 7.1.0 you can look for the form called CTM:People Permission Groups You should be able to query on that form where Permission Group = Asset User and then do a modify all to change those to Asset Viewer. I'm guessing that in 7.0.1 it is something similar. Hope this helps. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:38 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Asset Admin license removals Hi all, I've got about a thousand people records that I need to remove the asset admin licenses they were previously assigned, and replace those with Asset Viewers instead. Any pointers greatly appreciated! ;) ARS 7.0.1 p002, ITSM 7.0.1 p003, CMDB 2.0.1 p002, SQL 2K, Win2K3 servers Dave Drake, Remedy Admistrator, Cerner -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Asset Admin license removals
The entries are held in CTM:People Permission Groups you should be able to make the chage you need with a modify all. -Original Message- From: Drake,Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:38 am Subject: Asset Admin license removals Hi all, I've got about a thousand people records that I need to remove the asset admin licenses they were previously assigned, and replace those with Asset Viewers instead. Any pointers greatly appreciated! ;) ARS 7.0.1 p002, ITSM 7.0.1 p003, CMDB 2.0.1 p002, SQL 2K, Win2K3 servers Dave Drake, Remedy Admistrator, Cerner -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operation
** Hello Drew I have found that if you push a 0 length field into a char field with a length of say 255 chars, even though the field contains a single character it will give you this error. check the field lengths of the fields you are pushing and the field you are pushing into. that is the only thing i can think of, that will cause this type of error kind regards Shafqat Ayaz "Break the Rules, Forgive Quickly, Kiss Slowly, Love Truly, Laugh Uncontrollably, And Never Regret anything that made you Smile.." --- On Tue, 5/13/08, Drew Shuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Drew Shuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operationTo: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGDate: Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 5:43 PMJames, thank you for that suggestion, but it didn't help. It must be something else. Drew On Tue, 13 May 2008, jham36 wrote: Are you inserting a carriage return there? If so you need to put a carriage return in this way: Click the expand box for the set fields action. At the end of the line put a double quote. Press enter, then put another double quote. In the expand box it would look like this: "Server Start/Stop Instructions: " + $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$ + "." + " " + "Server Function Description: " + $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ Click OK and it will look something like this: "Server Start/Stop Instructions: " + $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$ + "." + "|" " + "Server Function Description: " + $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ You can't insert a carriage return in the single line view of the set fields. You need to do it after clicking the expand box. When you save, the system will put in the appropriate parentheses. James On May 13, 12:20pm, Drew Shuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, could someone give me a sanity check? I have a filter that pulls data from a staging form and pushes it into the AST:WorkLog form. But it errors out:ARERR [312] Data types are not appropriate for arithmetic operation Here's my set fields: ((( "Server Start/Stop Instructions: " + $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$) + ". ") + " Server Function Description: ") + $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ Those fields are character fields. The field in AST:Worklog is also a character field, with a length of 0. This should be working, shouldn't it? Or am I missing something? Drew Tulsa ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
Re: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operation
In the past, with older versions, I did this once. It caused a buffer overflow and crashed the server. I have checked it on newer versions and it no longer does this. I have not experienced the error he is having, but it's worth a look. Thanks, Gary Opela, Jr., RSP Remedy Engineer Leader Communications, Inc. http://www.5pointleader.com http://www.lcibest.com Best Product, Best People, Best PriceTM An ISO 9001:2000 Certified, CMMI(r) Level 3 Rated Company From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shafqat Ayaz Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:51 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operation ** Hello Drew I have found that if you push a 0 length field into a char field with a length of say 255 chars, even though the field contains a single character it will give you this error. check the field lengths of the fields you are pushing and the field you are pushing into. that is the only thing i can think of, that will cause this type of error kind regards Shafqat Ayaz Break the Rules, Forgive Quickly, Kiss Slowly, Love Truly, Laugh Uncontrollably, And Never Regret anything that made you Smile.. --- On Tue, 5/13/08, Drew Shuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Drew Shuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operation To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 5:43 PM James, thank you for that suggestion, but it didn't help. It must be something else. Drew On Tue, 13 May 2008, jham36 wrote: Are you inserting a carriage return there? If so you need to put a carriage return in this way: Click the expand box for the set fields action. At the end of the line put a double quote. Press enter, then put another double quote. In the expand box it would look like this: Server Start/Stop Instructions: + $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$ + . + + Server Function Description: + $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ Click OK and it will look something like this: Server Start/Stop Instructions: + $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$ + . + | + Server Function Description: + $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ You can't insert a carriage return in the single line view of the set fields. You need to do it after clicking the expand box. When you save, the system will put in the appropriate parentheses. James On May 13, 12:20 pm, Drew Shuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, could someone give me a sanity check? I have a filter that pulls data from a staging form and pushes it into the AST:WorkLog form. But it errors out:ARERR [312] Data types are not appropriate for arithmetic operation Here's my set fields: ((( Server Start/Stop Instructions: + $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$) + . ) + Server Function Description: ) + $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ Those fields are character fields. The field in AST:Worklog is also a character field, with a length of 0. This should be working, shouldn't it? Or am I missing something? Drew Tulsa ___- UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
RES: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operation
Hi, Try to use ' in your $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$ and $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ Like these: '$SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$' '$SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$' Att, Tadeu De: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) em nome de Drew Shuller Enviada: ter 13/5/2008 13:20 Para: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Assunto: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operation Hello everyone, could someone give me a sanity check? I have a filter that pulls data from a staging form and pushes it into the AST:WorkLog form. But it errors out:ARERR [312] Data types are not appropriate for arithmetic operation Here's my set fields: ((( Server Start/Stop Instructions: + $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$) + . ) + Server Function Description: ) + $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ Those fields are character fields. The field in AST:Worklog is also a character field, with a length of 0. This should be working, shouldn't it? Or am I missing something? Drew Tulsa ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3
I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 (U)
UNCLASSIFIED Does you import set the SCHEMA fields? Sandra Hennigan OSD Enterprise Remedy Administrator Office # 703-602-2525 x248 Apparently, there is nothing that cannot happen today. Mark Twain -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heinzel, Jamie Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:01 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie _ This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3
The support console is sourced in the SHR:ConsolidatedList form. You will need to look at the workflow that pushes to there when a Help Desk record is created, and ensure that workflow fires when you import your tickets. Rick On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Heinzel, Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie -- This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3
Jamie: What version of Help Desk are you on? Thanks, --Phil - Original Message From: Heinzel, Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:01:18 AM Subject: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** I’m looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn’t seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren’t showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 (U)
I suppose it would have helped to attach what I'm mapping currently. Thanks in advance, Jamie -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennigan, Sandra H CTR OSD-CIO Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:15 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 (U) UNCLASSIFIED Does you import set the SCHEMA fields? Sandra Hennigan OSD Enterprise Remedy Administrator Office # 703-602-2525 x248 Apparently, there is nothing that cannot happen today. Mark Twain -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heinzel, Jamie Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:01 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie _ This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Areattachment: import.gif
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
** Thanks Phil,I wasn't being sardonic.We have a non-IT support group that maintains non-IT related products (light bulbs, etc) they do however use Remedy.The point I have overlooked is that ITIL relies so much on IT only products, that the ITSM suite really excludes all other non-IT departments when the Service Desk is a single point of contact for ALL issues.It's going to be interesting to make other non-IT departments fit the ITSM life cycle.Thanks again,Kevin P.** Kevin:I'm not sure if you're just being sardonic, but in case you're not; light bulbs would be bulk assets (as would any item that has no distinguishing attributes within its class).--Phil __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3
Have you tried using the ITSM data imort tool? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Phil Murnane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:17:28 To:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** Jamie: What version of Help Desk are you on? Thanks, --Phil - Original Message From: Heinzel, Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:01:18 AM Subject: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** I’m looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn’t seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren’t showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com http://www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
Kevin: I'm not sure if you're just being sardonic, but in case you're not; light bulbs would be bulk assets (as would any item that has no distinguishing attributes within its class). --Phil - Original Message From: Kevin Pulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:16:26 AM Subject: Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions ** Well, I find it very disturbing from what Shawn stated - Part of the problem is that there are no good answers to your questions If the CMDB is really suppose to be the center of the Universe for ITSM, as it shows so well in the BMC literature, how can there be no real good answers? And if ITSM is suppose to be heavily ITIL influenced, how can any company use ITSM and state ITIL is not for me? Isn't that an Oxymoron? You really can't play a game with 15 rules, turn around and state there are no rules. Yes, ITIL is a framework (Pick and choose what you will), however without a foundation, it will collapse. Fine, I'll just turn up the heavy metal music and make my best guess where light bulbs fit into a CI when creating my product categories because not everything is a computer. Thanks, Kevin P. ** Kevin: This situation is not a ploy to sell services. In its simplest form, the fact is that ITIL adoption is a complex endeavor, and if your organization is not willing to front-load their effort, then ITIL adoption may not be for them. Everything that Chris mentioned is important. Beyond what Chris wrote, it's necessary to understand the thought processes that lead him to write what he did. If your concern is future usability, then it is necessary to make your very best effort to anticipate what the future needs will be. Only after this process is grossly conlcluded can the CMDB be configured to meet the need. Along with this concept, understand that the expected need will never exactly match the actual future need, and so all you can do is make your best effort. Just like CQI, ITIL is a journey, not a destination. Less philosophically, my strongest recommendation to a customer is to not add any new attributes or classes unless there is a demonstrable business need for the new class/attribute. In my experience, customers are often suprised how many CIs can be tracked using simply the BaseElement class. My personal #1 rule of CMDB: unless there is a business need to consume the data, do not store the data in the CMDB. This rule extends to the Product Catalog, in that if there is no need to consume the data, then there is no need to categorize the data. Also, as Shawn mentioned, if you're using BMC's AM module, you have many restrictions in the day-to-day use of your data, so some of these questions, when pursued to their logical conclusion, will lead you to it doesn't matter. Just My $0.02, --Phil __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 (U)
Jamie - Rick and David and everyone are right, but if you have already imported the data and you do see it in the HelpDesk form, try performing a modify on one of the tickets and see if it pushes the values to the underlying SHR:ConsolidateList form. If so it might be easier for you to just do some simple modify all to get the records already in place pushed over to the SHR:ConsolidatedList form which will then display in the console table view. I forget now on V6.x whether the modify will do the push, but might be worth a try. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heinzel, Jamie Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:18 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 (U) I suppose it would have helped to attach what I'm mapping currently. Thanks in advance, Jamie -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennigan, Sandra H CTR OSD-CIO Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:15 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 (U) UNCLASSIFIED Does you import set the SCHEMA fields? Sandra Hennigan OSD Enterprise Remedy Administrator Office # 703-602-2525 x248 Apparently, there is nothing that cannot happen today. Mark Twain -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heinzel, Jamie Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:01 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie _ This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3
To Rick's point: The issue you are running into, I believe, is that none of the filter workflow associated with generating a help desk ticket executes on merge, therefore, the SHR:ConsolidatedList form isn't going to be populated. If this is going to be an ongoing process you will need to modify some of the out-of-the-box filter workflow. If it's a one-time thing you could, conceivable, find a way to trigger the push OR export what you have imported and import that export into the SHR:ConsolidatedList. Scott Parrish IT Prophets, LLC (770) 653-5203 www.itprophets.com _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:16 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** The support console is sourced in the SHR:ConsolidatedList form. You will need to look at the workflow that pushes to there when a Help Desk record is created, and ensure that workflow fires when you import your tickets. Rick On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Heinzel, Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie _ This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3
No this is going to be an ongoing process. I'm still trying to figure out the best way to do it, so all options are on the table. I think it's obvious from my posts that I'm fairly new to Remedy. This is part of a larger automation project that I'm working on and scripted creation of Remedy profiles and tickets are part of it. Jamie From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Parrish Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:32 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 To Rick's point: The issue you are running into, I believe, is that none of the filter workflow associated with generating a help desk ticket executes on merge, therefore, the SHR:ConsolidatedList form isn't going to be populated. If this is going to be an ongoing process you will need to modify some of the out-of-the-box filter workflow. If it's a one-time thing you could, conceivable, find a way to trigger the push OR export what you have imported and import that export into the SHR:ConsolidatedList. Scott Parrish IT Prophets, LLC (770) 653-5203 www.itprophets.com From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:16 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** The support console is sourced in the SHR:ConsolidatedList form. You will need to look at the workflow that pushes to there when a Help Desk record is created, and ensure that workflow fires when you import your tickets. Rick On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Heinzel, Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3
Jamie, Without knowing all of the ins and outs of your environment and exactly what you are trying to do it's hard to say what the best route may be, but if it were me, I would probably create a Display Only staging form with just the fields that are being imported. I would have workflow that executes On Merge to push the data from the staging form into the HPD:HelpDesk form (as this will cause a submit and all workflow that executes on submit will execute). There's many ways to skin this cat, this is just one of them. Scott Parrish IT Prophets, LLC (770) 653-5203 www.itprophets.com _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heinzel, Jamie Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:40 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 No this is going to be an ongoing process. I'm still trying to figure out the best way to do it, so all options are on the table. I think it's obvious from my posts that I'm fairly new to Remedy. This is part of a larger automation project that I'm working on and scripted creation of Remedy profiles and tickets are part of it. Jamie _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Parrish Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:32 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 To Rick's point: The issue you are running into, I believe, is that none of the filter workflow associated with generating a help desk ticket executes on merge, therefore, the SHR:ConsolidatedList form isn't going to be populated. If this is going to be an ongoing process you will need to modify some of the out-of-the-box filter workflow. If it's a one-time thing you could, conceivable, find a way to trigger the push OR export what you have imported and import that export into the SHR:ConsolidatedList. Scott Parrish IT Prophets, LLC (770) 653-5203 www.itprophets.com _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:16 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** The support console is sourced in the SHR:ConsolidatedList form. You will need to look at the workflow that pushes to there when a Help Desk record is created, and ensure that workflow fires when you import your tickets. Rick On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Heinzel, Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie _ This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ _ This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents.
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
When I said is that there are no good answers, I should have qualified that. There are no good answers if you want a simple, broad, overreaching solution. Even with ITIL as a framework, you have to come up with your own answers to the questions. I see ITIL as almost a philosophy based around I.T. rather than a rule book. There are no correct answers in something that isn't a concrete science. However, I am pretty sure that if you're putting light bulbs in the CMDB, you're going to have bigger problems than I have with my CMDB implementation. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Pulsen Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:16 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions ** Well, I find it very disturbing from what Shawn stated - Part of the problem is that there are no good answers to your questions If the CMDB is really suppose to be the center of the Universe for ITSM, as it shows so well in the BMC literature, how can there be no real good answers? And if ITSM is suppose to be heavily ITIL influenced, how can any company use ITSM and state ITIL is not for me? Isn't that an Oxymoron? You really can't play a game with 15 rules, turn around and state there are no rules. Yes, ITIL is a framework (Pick and choose what you will), however without a foundation, it will collapse. Fine, I'll just turn up the heavy metal music and make my best guess where light bulbs fit into a CI when creating my product categories because not everything is a computer. Thanks, Kevin P. ** Kevin: This situation is not a ploy to sell services. In its simplest form, the fact is that ITIL adoption is a complex endeavor, and if your organization is not willing to front-load their effort, then ITIL adoption may not be for them. Everything that Chris mentioned is important. Beyond what Chris wrote, it's necessary to understand the thought processes that lead him to write what he did. If your concern is future usability, then it is necessary to make your very best effort to anticipate what the future needs will be. Only after this process is grossly conlcluded can the CMDB be configured to meet the need. Along with this concept, understand that the expected need will never exactly match the actual future need, and so all you can do is make your best effort. Just like CQI, ITIL is a journey, not a destination. Less philosophically, my strongest recommendation to a customer is to not add any new attributes or classes unless there is a demonstrable business need for the new class/attribute. In my experience, customers are often suprised how many CIs can be tracked using simply the BaseElement class. My personal #1 rule of CMDB: unless there is a business need to consume the data, do not store the data in the CMDB. This rule extends to the Product Catalog, in that if there is no need to consume the data, then there is no need to categorize the data. Also, as Shawn mentioned, if you're using BMC's AM module, you have many restrictions in the day-to-day use of your data, so some of these questions, when pursued to their logical conclusion, will lead you to it doesn't matter. Just My $0.02, --Phil __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ Private and confidential as detailed here: http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the link, please e-mail sender. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Asset Admin license removals
Aye, I can use an escalation to modify the CTM:People Permission Group entries, but that doesn't seem to affect the User form records -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decou, Candace M Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:46 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Dave - not sure if this is correct in your version, but in 7.1.0 you can look for the form called CTM:People Permission Groups You should be able to query on that form where Permission Group = Asset User and then do a modify all to change those to Asset Viewer. I'm guessing that in 7.0.1 it is something similar. Hope this helps. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:38 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Asset Admin license removals Hi all, I've got about a thousand people records that I need to remove the asset admin licenses they were previously assigned, and replace those with Asset Viewers instead. Any pointers greatly appreciated! ;) ARS 7.0.1 p002, ITSM 7.0.1 p003, CMDB 2.0.1 p002, SQL 2K, Win2K3 servers Dave Drake, Remedy Admistrator, Cerner -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Test (please ignore)
___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
You know, you could always go to your management and tell them that the I.T. in ITSM and ITIL stands for Information Technology, and that there may be bigger risks involved in trying to make the ITSM suite have all the functionality they need for non-I.T. related things. Remedy is great for building applications in, many of which are not related to I.T. functions. ITSM is a different beast. Shawn Pierson From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Pulsen Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:22 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions ** Thanks Phil, I wasn't being sardonic. We have a non-IT support group that maintains non-IT related products (light bulbs, etc) they do however use Remedy. The point I have overlooked is that ITIL relies so much on IT only products, that the ITSM suite really excludes all other non-IT departments when the Service Desk is a single point of contact for ALL issues. It's going to be interesting to make other non-IT departments fit the ITSM life cycle. Thanks again, Kevin P. ** Kevin: I'm not sure if you're just being sardonic, but in case you're not; light bulbs would be bulk assets (as would any item that has no distinguishing attributes within its class). --Phil __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ Private and confidential as detailed here: http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the link, please e-mail sender. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Asset Admin license removals
H - well then I might recommend that you snoop around some of the filters that fire on Modify from the CTM:People Permission Group form - may be in the range of the CTM:PPG:UpdateGroupList filters. See if you can modify or figure out how to make those fire correctly to reset values in the User form when you perform your update. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:54 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Aye, I can use an escalation to modify the CTM:People Permission Group entries, but that doesn't seem to affect the User form records -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decou, Candace M Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:46 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Dave - not sure if this is correct in your version, but in 7.1.0 you can look for the form called CTM:People Permission Groups You should be able to query on that form where Permission Group = Asset User and then do a modify all to change those to Asset Viewer. I'm guessing that in 7.0.1 it is something similar. Hope this helps. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:38 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Asset Admin license removals Hi all, I've got about a thousand people records that I need to remove the asset admin licenses they were previously assigned, and replace those with Asset Viewers instead. Any pointers greatly appreciated! ;) ARS 7.0.1 p002, ITSM 7.0.1 p003, CMDB 2.0.1 p002, SQL 2K, Win2K3 servers Dave Drake, Remedy Admistrator, Cerner -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Asset Admin license removals
Awesome! Thank you -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decou, Candace M Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:32 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals H - well then I might recommend that you snoop around some of the filters that fire on Modify from the CTM:People Permission Group form - may be in the range of the CTM:PPG:UpdateGroupList filters. See if you can modify or figure out how to make those fire correctly to reset values in the User form when you perform your update. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:54 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Aye, I can use an escalation to modify the CTM:People Permission Group entries, but that doesn't seem to affect the User form records -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decou, Candace M Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:46 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Dave - not sure if this is correct in your version, but in 7.1.0 you can look for the form called CTM:People Permission Groups You should be able to query on that form where Permission Group = Asset User and then do a modify all to change those to Asset Viewer. I'm guessing that in 7.0.1 it is something similar. Hope this helps. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:38 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Asset Admin license removals Hi all, I've got about a thousand people records that I need to remove the asset admin licenses they were previously assigned, and replace those with Asset Viewers instead. Any pointers greatly appreciated! ;) ARS 7.0.1 p002, ITSM 7.0.1 p003, CMDB 2.0.1 p002, SQL 2K, Win2K3 servers Dave Drake, Remedy Admistrator, Cerner -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3
Thanks for all your help and guidance on this, I'll try what you said and see how it goes. Jamie From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Parrish Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:49 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 Jamie, Without knowing all of the ins and outs of your environment and exactly what you are trying to do it's hard to say what the best route may be, but if it were me, I would probably create a Display Only staging form with just the fields that are being imported. I would have workflow that executes On Merge to push the data from the staging form into the HPD:HelpDesk form (as this will cause a submit and all workflow that executes on submit will execute). There's many ways to skin this cat, this is just one of them. Scott Parrish IT Prophets, LLC (770) 653-5203 www.itprophets.com From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heinzel, Jamie Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:40 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 No this is going to be an ongoing process. I'm still trying to figure out the best way to do it, so all options are on the table. I think it's obvious from my posts that I'm fairly new to Remedy. This is part of a larger automation project that I'm working on and scripted creation of Remedy profiles and tickets are part of it. Jamie From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Parrish Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:32 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 To Rick's point: The issue you are running into, I believe, is that none of the filter workflow associated with generating a help desk ticket executes on merge, therefore, the SHR:ConsolidatedList form isn't going to be populated. If this is going to be an ongoing process you will need to modify some of the out-of-the-box filter workflow. If it's a one-time thing you could, conceivable, find a way to trigger the push OR export what you have imported and import that export into the SHR:ConsolidatedList. Scott Parrish IT Prophets, LLC (770) 653-5203 www.itprophets.com From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:16 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Import into HPD:HelpDesk ARS 6.3 ** The support console is sourced in the SHR:ConsolidatedList form. You will need to look at the workflow that pushes to there when a Help Desk record is created, and ensure that workflow fires when you import your tickets. Rick On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Heinzel, Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** I'm looking for some assistance in importing from a csv into HPD:HelpDesk to create tickets as part of a batch process when a new user is set up. I have the import working, but it doesn't seem that the tickets are showing up in Remedy User. They show up if I do a search for open tickets, but they aren't showing up in the support console for some reason. I can provide any additional information that is needed to help out. If someone has done this before or if someone can point me in the right direction it would be great. Thanks in advance, Jamie This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited by federal law. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. __ This email has been scanned by VCPI Managed Email Content Services, powered by MessageLabs technology. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ This communication may contain confidential Protected Health Information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law
Populating CMDDB by discovery....how?
I'm new to 7.x and have a test system that I'm building. I just finished installing the integration engine. I've read sort of spotty references to being able to do discovery of assets on a network. But, I have found nothing in the manuals under discovery - or in the Master Index. We have an SMS system that we use and if possible I'd like to use that, but if there is a built-in discovery tool with Remedy I'd be willing to try that instead - but if there is, where do I find it? Alsoanyone who uses SMS as a data source.what are your experiences with that way of populating the database? Thanks!! Portions of this message may be confidential under an exemption to Ohio's public records law or under a legal privilege. If you have received this message in error or due to an unauthorized transmission or interception, please delete all copies from your system without disclosing, copying, or transmitting this message. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Populating CMDDB by discovery....how?
No built in tool. If you go to http://developer.bmc.com/bmcdn/bmcdn/landing.jsf you can download the SMS integration that is free. THe manuals are included. -Original Message- From: Richard Copits [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tue, 13 May 2008 1:51 pm Subject: Populating CMDDB by discoveryhow? ** I’m new to 7.x and have a test system that I’m building. I just finished installing the integration engine. I’ve read sort of spotty references to being able to do “discovery” of assets on a network. But, I have found nothing in the manuals under “discovery” – or in the Master Index. We have an SMS system that we use and if possible I’d like to use that, but if there is a built-in discovery tool with Remedy I’d be willing to try that instead – but if there is, where do I find it? Also….anyone who uses SMS as a data source…..what are your experiences with that way of populating the database? Thanks!! Portions of this message may be confidential under an exemption to Ohio's public records law or under a legal privilege. If you have received this message in error or due to an unauthorized transmission or interception, please delete all copies from your system without disclosing, copying, or transmitting this message. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Asset Admin license removals
My pleasure - keep us posted. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:41 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Awesome! Thank you -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decou, Candace M Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:32 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals H - well then I might recommend that you snoop around some of the filters that fire on Modify from the CTM:People Permission Group form - may be in the range of the CTM:PPG:UpdateGroupList filters. See if you can modify or figure out how to make those fire correctly to reset values in the User form when you perform your update. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:54 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Aye, I can use an escalation to modify the CTM:People Permission Group entries, but that doesn't seem to affect the User form records -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decou, Candace M Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:46 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Dave - not sure if this is correct in your version, but in 7.1.0 you can look for the form called CTM:People Permission Groups You should be able to query on that form where Permission Group = Asset User and then do a modify all to change those to Asset Viewer. I'm guessing that in 7.0.1 it is something similar. Hope this helps. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:38 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Asset Admin license removals Hi all, I've got about a thousand people records that I need to remove the asset admin licenses they were previously assigned, and replace those with Asset Viewers instead. Any pointers greatly appreciated! ;) ARS 7.0.1 p002, ITSM 7.0.1 p003, CMDB 2.0.1 p002, SQL 2K, Win2K3 servers Dave Drake, Remedy Admistrator, Cerner -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Asset Admin license removals
Dave, I think you're probably better off creating new people permission group records for the new permission and then modifying the existing records for the old permission. The contents of the z1D_Action field control what happens to the Application License field on the User form. Take a look at the highest number filters on CTM:People Permission Groups, and look at what happens when you set the action to REMOVE Doug .. Original Message ... On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:33 -0500 Drake,Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aye, I can use an escalation to modify the CTM:People Permission Group entries, but that doesn't seem to affect the User form records -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decou, Candace M Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:46 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Asset Admin license removals Dave - not sure if this is correct in your version, but in 7.1.0 you can look for the form called CTM:People Permission Groups You should be able to query on that form where Permission Group = Asset User and then do a modify all to change those to Asset Viewer. I'm guessing that in 7.0.1 it is something similar. Hope this helps. :) Candace DeCou DOI Remedy Systems Analyst Verizon Business Office: (408) 371-1112 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless otherwise indicated -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake,Dave Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:38 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Asset Admin license removals Hi all, I've got about a thousand people records that I need to remove the asset admin licenses they were previously assigned, and replace those with Asset Viewers instead. Any pointers greatly appreciated! ;) ARS 7.0.1 p002, ITSM 7.0.1 p003, CMDB 2.0.1 p002, SQL 2K, Win2K3 servers Dave Drake, Remedy Admistrator, Cerner -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are _ Doug Blair Remedy Skilled Professional doug at blairing dotcom +1 224-558-5462 Sent from my Treo, usual caveats apply ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Populating CMDDB by discovery....how?
Great! Thank you!! From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Justice Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:58 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Populating CMDDB by discoveryhow? ** No built in tool. If you go to http://developer.bmc.com/bmcdn/bmcdn/landing.jsf you can download the SMS integration that is free. THe manuals are included. -Original Message- From: Richard Copits [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tue, 13 May 2008 1:51 pm Subject: Populating CMDDB by discoveryhow? ** I’m new to 7.x and have a test system that I’m building. I just finished installing the integration engine. I’ve read sort of spotty references to being able to do “discovery” of assets on a network. But, I have found nothing in the manuals under “discovery” – or in the Master Index. We have an SMS system that we use and if possible I’d like to use that, but if there is a built-in discovery tool with Remedy I’d be willing to try that instead – but if there is, where do I find it? Also….anyone who uses SMS as a data source…..what are your experiences with that way of populating the database? Thanks!! Portions of this message may be confidential under an exemption to Ohio's public records law or under a legal privilege. If you have received this message in error or due to an unauthorized transmission or interception, please delete all copies from your system without disclosing, copying, or transmitting this message. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com http://www.rmsportal.com/ ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ Plan your next roadtrip with MapQuest.com http://www.mapquest.com/?ncid=mpqmap000304 : America's #1 Mapping Site. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ Portions of this message may be confidential under an exemption to Ohio's public records law or under a legal privilege. If you have received this message in error or due to an unauthorized transmission or interception, please delete all copies from your system without disclosing, copying, or transmitting this message.
Question: SYS:Notification Messages
I wanted to add another field (Change Type) to one of the out of the box Notifications, so I added the field to: SYS:Form Field Selection The field shows up in the pull down menu in SYS:Notification Messages - however, when the notification goes out it is just showing as #Change Type#. Any ideas why? Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages
I've found that there are additional filters that translate the #fieldname# from the SYS:form into the $fieldname$ variables that we're use to seeing. For example, take a look at this filter: NTE:SHR:TranslateNotificationMessageINC1_100 It very well could be the one that you need to modify for your change. Hope that helps, LisaD -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:45 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question: SYS:Notification Messages I wanted to add another field (Change Type) to one of the out of the box Notifications, so I added the field to: SYS:Form Field Selection The field shows up in the pull down menu in SYS:Notification Messages - however, when the notification goes out it is just showing as #Change Type#. Any ideas why? Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author. This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender on the number above. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
email question
I am doing a notify filter that uses email. On the Recipient line, I'm specifying a mix of field values and groups. I currently have the recipient set as: $Originator$; Finance; Contracts; $data_Purchaser$ Originator and data_Purchaser fields, Finance and Contracts are groups. I want the email to go out to the Originator, the data_Purchaser, and everyone in contracts and finance. I'm having a few issues that I'm not yet sure from where they are coming. I just wanted to make sure I had this part of it correct first. Any comments? Thanks, Gary Opela, Jr., RSP Remedy Engineer Leader Communications, Inc. http://www.5pointleader.com http://www.lcibest.com Best Product, Best People, Best PriceTM An ISO 9001:2000 Certified, CMMI(r) Level 3 Rated Company ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operation
I have had trouble in the past using the / symbol in the name. My fix was to remove the / from the name. It shouldn't matter since the / is enclosed in quotes, but I have seen this cause the error you are getting. Todd Arner -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drew Shuller Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:21 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Data types not appropriate for arithmitic operation Hello everyone, could someone give me a sanity check? I have a filter that pulls data from a staging form and pushes it into the AST:WorkLog form. But it errors out:ARERR [312] Data types are not appropriate for arithmetic operation Here's my set fields: ((( Server Start/Stop Instructions: + $SRVR_STRT_STP_INSTR_DESC?$) + . ) + Server Function Description: ) + $SRVR_FUNCTN_DESC$ Those fields are character fields. The field in AST:Worklog is also a character field, with a length of 0. This should be working, shouldn't it? Or am I missing something? Drew Tulsa ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages
Thanks Lisa - I found the one for Change NTE:SHR:TranslateNotificationMessageCRQ1_125 and it does have a translation for #Change Type#, but it is not working. Any other suggestions? Thanks again. Ty On 5/13/08, Lisa Westerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that there are additional filters that translate the #fieldname# from the SYS:form into the $fieldname$ variables that we're use to seeing. For example, take a look at this filter: NTE:SHR:TranslateNotificationMessageINC1_100 It very well could be the one that you need to modify for your change. Hope that helps, LisaD -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:45 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question: SYS:Notification Messages I wanted to add another field (Change Type) to one of the out of the box Notifications, so I added the field to: SYS:Form Field Selection The field shows up in the pull down menu in SYS:Notification Messages - however, when the notification goes out it is just showing as #Change Type#. Any ideas why? Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author. This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender on the number above. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Field 112 control in ITSM 7
It has become evident that the ITSM 7 application does not, in fact, implement multi-tenancy properly, only a faint shadow of it. We had been led to believe in all of our discussions with engineers at two different UserWorlds (and had not been able to disprove it in testing) that the permissions of an Incident would be modified to reflect the customer, current owner, and current assigned group throughout the life cycle of the request. This is not, in fact, what is taking place, OOTB, at least not once you have patched through 007. The only permissions being posted to the incident are those of the customer - one group id in field 112. Has anyone had to supplement the ITSM 7 application with workflow that dynamically and explicitly adds group information to field 112 for the assigned support group and the owner group, and removes it as the incident changes assignment/ownership? If not, I guess I will be inventing it from scratch - this HAS to work. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7
We did it but not through group 112. The reason we chose to go that was strategic - we do not know what changes BMC will make in future versions to break whatever we customized. Instead we did it through Dynamic Groups + workflow. In the end it was pretty slick and conditional. Contact me off-list for specifics if you need. William Rentfrow, Principal Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] C 701-306-6157 O 952-432-0227 -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 It has become evident that the ITSM 7 application does not, in fact, implement multi-tenancy properly, only a faint shadow of it. We had been led to believe in all of our discussions with engineers at two different UserWorlds (and had not been able to disprove it in testing) that the permissions of an Incident would be modified to reflect the customer, current owner, and current assigned group throughout the life cycle of the request. This is not, in fact, what is taking place, OOTB, at least not once you have patched through 007. The only permissions being posted to the incident are those of the customer - one group id in field 112. Has anyone had to supplement the ITSM 7 application with workflow that dynamically and explicitly adds group information to field 112 for the assigned support group and the owner group, and removes it as the incident changes assignment/ownership? If not, I guess I will be inventing it from scratch - this HAS to work. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7
Create a workflow on modify that will set the value of field 112 to $group1$ + $group2$ + $group3$. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 It has become evident that the ITSM 7 application does not, in fact, implement multi-tenancy properly, only a faint shadow of it. We had been led to believe in all of our discussions with engineers at two different UserWorlds (and had not been able to disprove it in testing) that the permissions of an Incident would be modified to reflect the customer, current owner, and current assigned group throughout the life cycle of the request. This is not, in fact, what is taking place, OOTB, at least not once you have patched through 007. The only permissions being posted to the incident are those of the customer - one group id in field 112. Has anyone had to supplement the ITSM 7 application with workflow that dynamically and explicitly adds group information to field 112 for the assigned support group and the owner group, and removes it as the incident changes assignment/ownership? If not, I guess I will be inventing it from scratch - this HAS to work. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this e-mail and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named above by reply e-mail, and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions
The problem with Categorization Subclasses is that you cannot introduce new attributes with different permission group. In cases where, for example, it is not acceptable for server servicing group to change PC configurations which is the domain of PC servicing group you cannot put everything in BMC_ComputerSystem Class Victor On Tuesday 13 of May 2008 17:30:03 Rick Cook wrote: And BMC's #1 rule on customizing the CMDB CDM is to try to create Categorization Subclasses under an existing class structure before creating new classes. Creating new classes and subclasses should be reserved for situations that can be proven to not fit into any of the existing ones. That's how BMC_ComputerSystem can be used to contain almost all discoverable IT assets. Rick On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Phil Murnane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Kevin: This situation is not a ploy to sell services. In its simplest form, the fact is that ITIL adoption is a complex endeavor, and if your organization is not willing to front-load their effort, then ITIL adoption may not be for them. Everything that Chris mentioned is important. Beyond what Chris wrote, it's necessary to understand the thought processes that lead him to write what he did. If your concern is future usability, then it is necessary to make your very best effort to anticipate what the future needs will be. Only after this process is grossly conlcluded can the CMDB be configured to meet the need. Along with this concept, understand that the expected need will never exactly match the actual future need, and so all you can do is make your best effort. Just like CQI, ITIL is a journey, not a destination. Less philosophically, my strongest recommendation to a customer is to not add any new attributes or classes unless there is a demonstrable business need for the new class/attribute. In my experience, customers are often suprised how many CIs can be tracked using simply the BaseElement class. My personal #1 rule of CMDB: unless there is a business need to consume the data, do not store the data in the CMDB. This rule extends to the Product Catalog, in that if there is no need to consume the data, then there is no need to categorize the data. Also, as Shawn mentioned, if you're using BMC's AM module, you have many restrictions in the day-to-day use of your data, so some of these questions, when pursued to their logical conclusion, will lead you to it doesn't matter. Just My $0.02, --Phil - Original Message From: Kevin Pulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:35:07 AM Subject: Re: ITSM 7, CMDB CI and Product Definitions ** Thank you Shawn for your reply. My concern is, and this is what I have heard from BMC, when designing your Product categories, you need to think ahead to the design of the CMDB as well. It's all interrelated and affects reporting, trending analysis etc. I find it very difficult to design my Product categories and place all of the Non-Asset items in an 'OTHER' category, only to find out 2 years down the road our CMDB is messed up and mostly useless. Was this information from BMC a ploy to sell more Professional Services? I just hope to look enough ahead of the road to see the brick wall coming at me, that's all. Thanks again, Kevin P. ** Part of the problem is that there are no good answers to your questions. By default, we put things in the BMC_ComputerSystem class, unless it fits in somewhere else. So a Blackberry technically is a computer, just a tiny one. So is a calculator. Stuff that doesn't have a class and isn't anything remotely close to being a computer goes in as equipment. I'm wary of creating new classes unless there is a demonstrable need for it that is so strong we can't live without it. My users already hate that they have nothing in Asset Management to be able to search across the different classes (e.g. how do you find, in ITSM, all Assets located on the third floor of a certain building? The data exists, but there is no screen for users to pull that type of information.) New classes make the system harder to use. In fact, rather than creating a bunch of new classes, we've hidden some of the OOB classes to make the system easier to navigate. Shawn Pierson __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages
Hhmm... If I were sure that there was a value in that change record for Change Type, the only next step I would take would be to log it and ensure that the Z field is getting set as the filter indicates. Other than that, I don't have any more rabbits up my sleeve - sorry. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:13 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages Thanks Lisa - I found the one for Change NTE:SHR:TranslateNotificationMessageCRQ1_125 and it does have a translation for #Change Type#, but it is not working. Any other suggestions? Thanks again. Ty On 5/13/08, Lisa Westerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that there are additional filters that translate the #fieldname# from the SYS:form into the $fieldname$ variables that we're use to seeing. For example, take a look at this filter: NTE:SHR:TranslateNotificationMessageINC1_100 It very well could be the one that you need to modify for your change. Hope that helps, LisaD -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:45 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question: SYS:Notification Messages I wanted to add another field (Change Type) to one of the out of the box Notifications, so I added the field to: SYS:Form Field Selection The field shows up in the pull down menu in SYS:Notification Messages - however, when the notification goes out it is just showing as #Change Type#. Any ideas why? Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author. This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender on the number above. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Value too large for the meta table FIELD_DISPROP table!!!
I got this strange error when the SLM install script was trying to import one of the views. This is strange considering that a value being inserted into a meta data table should not have technically overshot the column length.. Failure during SQL operation to the database: ORA-12899: value too large for column ARADMIN701.FIELD_DISPPROP.PROPSHORT (actual: 270, maximum: 255) (ARERR 552) It looks like the data that needs to be written to this column is 15 characters too large.. Has anyone else seen a problem like this and if so how did you'll get around it? I'm not quite excited by the thought of having to alter a meta data table although that seems to be the only logical thing to do given this situation.. Cheers Joe D'Souza ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7
Chris, In my experiments with ITSM 7.0.3 Patch 7 I've found that field 112 on HPD:Help Desk will get set with multiple values if the option Enable Multiple Assign Groups is turned on for the AR Server. Additionally, I've found that field 112 gets set with the company values from the Customer, Contact and Categorization tab and NOT from the Assignment tab (and seems to be updated when any of these changes). In other words, Support Company does not get populated into field ID 112. This would seem to be counter-intuitive, no? My guess is that BMC reasoned the categorization and support company would match. Something else to watch out for: If multiple assign groups is enabled and you have an incident with a contact in Company A, a customer in Company B, a categorization from Company C and a Support company of Company D then all users who have access to Company A, Company B or Company C will be able to view the incident. Users in Company D will not be able to. --- J.T. Shyman -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 It has become evident that the ITSM 7 application does not, in fact, implement multi-tenancy properly, only a faint shadow of it. We had been led to believe in all of our discussions with engineers at two different UserWorlds (and had not been able to disprove it in testing) that the permissions of an Incident would be modified to reflect the customer, current owner, and current assigned group throughout the life cycle of the request. This is not, in fact, what is taking place, OOTB, at least not once you have patched through 007. The only permissions being posted to the incident are those of the customer - one group id in field 112. Has anyone had to supplement the ITSM 7 application with workflow that dynamically and explicitly adds group information to field 112 for the assigned support group and the owner group, and removes it as the incident changes assignment/ownership? If not, I guess I will be inventing it from scratch - this HAS to work. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7
That seemed the most obvious solution - I just wondered if anyone had done it and had success, i.e., not found serious flaws in it where it would break something else. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Feliciano, Ferdinand, A (Rocky) Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:27 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 Create a workflow on modify that will set the value of field 112 to $group1$ + $group2$ + $group3$. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 It has become evident that the ITSM 7 application does not, in fact, implement multi-tenancy properly, only a faint shadow of it. We had been led to believe in all of our discussions with engineers at two different UserWorlds (and had not been able to disprove it in testing) that the permissions of an Incident would be modified to reflect the customer, current owner, and current assigned group throughout the life cycle of the request. This is not, in fact, what is taking place, OOTB, at least not once you have patched through 007. The only permissions being posted to the incident are those of the customer - one group id in field 112. Has anyone had to supplement the ITSM 7 application with workflow that dynamically and explicitly adds group information to field 112 for the assigned support group and the owner group, and removes it as the incident changes assignment/ownership? If not, I guess I will be inventing it from scratch - this HAS to work. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this e-mail and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named above by reply e-mail, and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: email question
Earlier versions of the email engine needed a line seperator for each entity in the notify list.. I think pre ARS 6.x versions of the email engine.. What version are you on? Joe - Original Message From: Gary Opela (Corporate) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:08:28 PM Subject: email question ** I am doing a notify filter that uses email. On the Recipient line, I’m specifying a mix of field values and groups. I currently have the recipient set as: $Originator$; Finance; Contracts; $data_Purchaser$ Originator and data_Purchaser fields, Finance and Contracts are groups. I want the email to go out to the Originator, the data_Purchaser, and everyone in contracts and finance. I’m having a few issues that I’m not yet sure from where they are coming. I just wanted to make sure I had this part of it correct first. Any comments? Thanks, Gary Opela, Jr., RSP Remedy Engineer Leader Communications, Inc. http://www.5pointleader.com http://www.lcibest.com Best Product, Best People, Best PriceTM An ISO 9001:2000 Certified, CMMI® Level 3 Rated Company ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7
This server and all of my test servers along the way have always been set to Enable Multiple Assign Groups at birth. I know it is working because we have run into another idiosyncrasy where my data manager had copied to new several support staff records from customer records (only the login name differs, then you add all of the permissions to the new record). Those support staff records were visible to other companies that should not have been able to see them. It turns out that they still carried the group ID for the original, global customer company, as well as the new group id for their new home operational company. This only occurs when you copy to new in CTM:People. Thanks for the tips. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.T. Shyman Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:58 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 Chris, In my experiments with ITSM 7.0.3 Patch 7 I've found that field 112 on HPD:Help Desk will get set with multiple values if the option Enable Multiple Assign Groups is turned on for the AR Server. Additionally, I've found that field 112 gets set with the company values from the Customer, Contact and Categorization tab and NOT from the Assignment tab (and seems to be updated when any of these changes). In other words, Support Company does not get populated into field ID 112. This would seem to be counter-intuitive, no? My guess is that BMC reasoned the categorization and support company would match. Something else to watch out for: If multiple assign groups is enabled and you have an incident with a contact in Company A, a customer in Company B, a categorization from Company C and a Support company of Company D then all users who have access to Company A, Company B or Company C will be able to view the incident. Users in Company D will not be able to. --- J.T. Shyman -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 It has become evident that the ITSM 7 application does not, in fact, implement multi-tenancy properly, only a faint shadow of it. We had been led to believe in all of our discussions with engineers at two different UserWorlds (and had not been able to disprove it in testing) that the permissions of an Incident would be modified to reflect the customer, current owner, and current assigned group throughout the life cycle of the request. This is not, in fact, what is taking place, OOTB, at least not once you have patched through 007. The only permissions being posted to the incident are those of the customer - one group id in field 112. Has anyone had to supplement the ITSM 7 application with workflow that dynamically and explicitly adds group information to field 112 for the assigned support group and the owner group, and removes it as the incident changes assignment/ownership? If not, I guess I will be inventing it from scratch - this HAS to work. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Value too large for the meta table FIELD_DISPROP table!!!
Joe, Is this a Unicode ARS installation and which platform is it on? Does the view contain accented characters? If so it may be that the NLS_LANG is not set correctly - for Unicode systems it should end .AL32UTF8 Mark Walters The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, liaison or support representative for BMC Software, Inc. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: 13 May 2008 21:45 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Value too large for the meta table FIELD_DISPROP table!!! ** I got this strange error when the SLM install script was trying to import one of the views. This is strange considering that a value being inserted into a meta data table should not have technically overshot the column length.. Failure during SQL operation to the database: ORA-12899: value too large for column ARADMIN701.FIELD_DISPPROP.PROPSHORT (actual: 270, maximum: 255) (ARERR 552) It looks like the data that needs to be written to this column is 15 characters too large.. Has anyone else seen a problem like this and if so how did you'll get around it? I'm not quite excited by the thought of having to alter a meta data table although that seems to be the only logical thing to do given this situation.. Cheers Joe D'Souza __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7
As a general rule I try to avoid using copy to new unless it is a form I developed. Too many of the OOB forms either have a field that is part of a unique index (which prevents the new record from being saved at all) or a field that controls something like security gets copied and probably shouldn't. Thanks for the heads up on this one. --- J.T. Shyman -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:08 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 This server and all of my test servers along the way have always been set to Enable Multiple Assign Groups at birth. I know it is working because we have run into another idiosyncrasy where my data manager had copied to new several support staff records from customer records (only the login name differs, then you add all of the permissions to the new record). Those support staff records were visible to other companies that should not have been able to see them. It turns out that they still carried the group ID for the original, global customer company, as well as the new group id for their new home operational company. This only occurs when you copy to new in CTM:People. Thanks for the tips. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.T. Shyman Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:58 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 Chris, In my experiments with ITSM 7.0.3 Patch 7 I've found that field 112 on HPD:Help Desk will get set with multiple values if the option Enable Multiple Assign Groups is turned on for the AR Server. Additionally, I've found that field 112 gets set with the company values from the Customer, Contact and Categorization tab and NOT from the Assignment tab (and seems to be updated when any of these changes). In other words, Support Company does not get populated into field ID 112. This would seem to be counter-intuitive, no? My guess is that BMC reasoned the categorization and support company would match. Something else to watch out for: If multiple assign groups is enabled and you have an incident with a contact in Company A, a customer in Company B, a categorization from Company C and a Support company of Company D then all users who have access to Company A, Company B or Company C will be able to view the incident. Users in Company D will not be able to. --- J.T. Shyman -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Field 112 control in ITSM 7 It has become evident that the ITSM 7 application does not, in fact, implement multi-tenancy properly, only a faint shadow of it. We had been led to believe in all of our discussions with engineers at two different UserWorlds (and had not been able to disprove it in testing) that the permissions of an Incident would be modified to reflect the customer, current owner, and current assigned group throughout the life cycle of the request. This is not, in fact, what is taking place, OOTB, at least not once you have patched through 007. The only permissions being posted to the incident are those of the customer - one group id in field 112. Has anyone had to supplement the ITSM 7 application with workflow that dynamically and explicitly adds group information to field 112 for the assigned support group and the owner group, and removes it as the incident changes assignment/ownership? If not, I guess I will be inventing it from scratch - this HAS to work. Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Kristin S Lowe/Paramus/IBM
I will be out of the office starting 05/13/2008 and will not return until 05/14/2008. I am in Jury Duty today and will not have access to my email. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages
Which notification are you trying to add the Change Type field to? I have added it to the Approval notifications and all I had to do was add the following set field to the filter , NTE:SHR:TranslateNotificationMessageAPR_135. Set zID Translation Text to REPLACE($zID Translation Text$, #Change Type#, $Change Type$) Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 21:42:15 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Hhmm... If I were sure that there was a value in that change record for Change Type, the only next step I would take would be to log it and ensure that the Z field is getting set as the filter indicates. Other than that, I don't have any more rabbits up my sleeve - sorry. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:13 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages Thanks Lisa - I found the one for Change NTE:SHR:TranslateNotificationMessageCRQ1_125 and it does have a translation for #Change Type#, but it is not working. Any other suggestions? Thanks again. Ty On 5/13/08, Lisa Westerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that there are additional filters that translate the #fieldname# from the SYS:form into the $fieldname$ variables that we're use to seeing. For example, take a look at this filter: NTE:SHR:TranslateNotificationMessageINC1_100 It very well could be the one that you need to modify for your change. Hope that helps, LisaD -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages
Hi, I have a doc that describes in detail how to add a new field to a notification. I thk I got it on the BMC support site. It is primarily for ITSP 4.0, but the ITSM 7 notification workflow originates from there, so it should be similiar. Lemme know of an email ID if you need it, since its =~ 1MB. Rgds, Murtuza. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:15 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question: SYS:Notification Messages I wanted to add another field (Change Type) to one of the out of the box Notifications, so I added the field to: SYS:Form Field Selection The field shows up in the pull down menu in SYS:Notification Messages - however, when the notification goes out it is just showing as #Change Type#. Any ideas why? Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mails are not encrypted and cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Gaurav Jaidka/OR2/AEPIN is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 05/14/2008 and will not return until 05/21/2008. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are