RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
that's your answer then - see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;273263 -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2002 07:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 No still in Mixed mode -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 December 2002 12:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Are you in Exchange 2000 Native Mode yet? -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2002 00:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Interesting I don't have that function available. These are Public folders I migrated over from a Exchange 5.5 server via a pst file. They show as having email addresses already but if you right click, all tasks you only get Mail Enable it's as if Exchange doesn't know about the email addresses. Yet it works perfectly. I may need to recreated the Folders and copy the contents over to fix up the problem. Though looking at the default Folder Tree, it is set to MAPI Clients so I expect it will always create Mail Enabled folders which cannot be changed. Andy -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Andy, In ESM navigate to the public folder, right click, All Tasks, Mail Disable. Voila, Mike -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 09:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Is there a way to un mail enable a Public Folder? Apart from deleting and re-creating. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0
Hi, I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current backup. I know, that mails still probably are somewhere in exchange database, but marked as white space. Is there any way to get it back, or is it completely lost ? If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as quickly as possible ... Thanks a lot Honza Novak _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0
My vote goes with toast then..:-(. I know of no quick recovery if all those avenues have been tried without success. Sander -Original Message- From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2002 12:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0 Importance: High Hi, I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current backup. I know, that mails still probably are somewhere in exchange database, but marked as white space. Is there any way to get it back, or is it completely lost ? If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as quickly as possible ... Thanks a lot Honza Novak _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retenti on=0
Bit of a long shot but have they ever replied or forwarded them? Might have them in their Sent Items if they have. Ant. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2002 10:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0 My vote goes with toast then..:-(. I know of no quick recovery if all those avenues have been tried without success. Sander -Original Message- From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2002 12:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0 Importance: High Hi, I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current backup. I know, that mails still probably are somewhere in exchange database, but marked as white space. Is there any way to get it back, or is it completely lost ? If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as quickly as possible ... Thanks a lot Honza Novak _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of CP Ships. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the CP Ships Helpdesk at +44 (0) 1293 582 800. Further, we make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this email and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0
Completely lost, unless those emails were replied to (and in sent items) or also sent to another employee and can be pulled from their mailbox. In a normal exchange database, the transactions are frequent and plentiful. There may not even be any whitespace where there was 5 minutes ago. I'd chalk this up to lesson learned on so many fronts. 1) important emails in deleted items folder. Does this person file important documents in the waste paper basket by his desk? 2) no current backups. well. 'nough said. (of course you could mean since receipt of this email) 3) deleted item retention set to '0'. Out of curiosity, is transaction logging set to circular? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Novák Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Importance: High Hi, I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current backup. I know, that mails still probably are somewhere in exchange database, but marked as white space. Is there any way to get it back, or is it completely lost ? If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as quickly as possible ... Thanks a lot Honza Novak _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inbox in Deleted Items?????
First: Jeff, thanks for your reply. Outlook.exe /resetfolders didn't work. Maybe because the inbox is stil there and working just fine, the only problem is that is isn't on the right spot. It seems that i can't get it out of the deleted items folder. If there are any other suggestions... -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox in Deleted Items? You need to look at q296192(this one is for OL2002, but I think it will have links to the older versions)... you basically need to issue 'outlook.exe /ResetFolders' -Original Message- From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 4:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inbox in Deleted Items? Hello I have two users now who accidentally deleted their inboxes using outlook web access. The inbox is then placed in the deleted items folder. When i try to move it back, i get the message, access denied. I don't understand how this is possible, i thougt the inbox could not be delted or moved, but it seems there is a way to do it. The users couldn't tell me how they did it, it just happened. Does anybody know what causes this and, more important, how this can be solved? [Exchange 5.5 SP4 on WinNT 4.0 SP6] Thanks, in advance. Kind regards, Mahesh Bharatsingh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client
We've experienced sporatic issues with most of the DSL router/firewall combo units on the market with VPN connectivity to the office. More often than not, forcing the client MTU to =1400 and ensuring the latest BIOS on the router has fixed it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client We use something called Contivity by Nortel; their client does work through a NAT device, using a UDP-based application protocol to find the server. Works great through my Linux-based firewall, and my colleague's LinkSys router. Did _not_ work through my boss's new (bargain-priced) D-Link router; he had to get a LinkSys. I have few details on the above-mentioned UDP-based protocol. Could the MS VPN client be doing something similar? - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:33 PM Subject: Re: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client If it's doing NAT I don't think it'll work. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:23 PM Subject: OT: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client Hi all. Does anyone here use BellSouth DSL service? I just got it installed and it is working great. However when I am on DSL, I can't connect to my corporate network with the MS VPN client. My setup at home is: Win ME or Win 2K Pro with MS VPN client BellSouth gave me Westell WireSpeed DSL modem I bought D-Link 614+ Wireless router. However my PC is wired. D-Link is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I have even tried to bypass D-Link and connected straight to the Westell modem. Still no luck. The Westell modem is actually a router with a firewall but as far as I can see it is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I can ping the external IP address of the VPN server. MS VPN client can see it too but it times out on Verifying username and password and gives error 650. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 200 Folder size
No. View | Current View and select something different than is currently selected. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 200 Folder size Is this the setting you are talking about? On the Tools menu, click E-mail Accounts. Select View or change existing e-mail accounts, and then click Next. Click the e-mail account you want, and then click Change, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
Of course you did. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk I only meant that in the most constructive, helpful, caring sense possible. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 5:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk You would know that, too, wouldn't you? Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk Don't sell yourself short. You're a technical pr!ck. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN
script that shuts down the db does the snapshot and then restarts the db all done in less than a minute. Yo I don't know about you, but shutting down my Exchange databases takes significantly longer than a minute. Granted, they're still predominantly Ex5.5, but its not a one minute process. Might be if I did it daily, but I can't, since we run 24x7. Personally, I still think the best way to do it is to use a backup to disk option and rip that to tape, or use an agent based backup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN It's only if you are taking snapshots of running db's that you have the problems. OK I know there are a number of sites out there who will not allow even a minute of the air but the majority of us can live with a script that shuts down the db does the snapshot and then restarts the db all done in less than a minute. You can then kick off your backup which backs the snapshot up to tape. I have seen this form of snapshotting on EMC and NetApps and it works very well. I have also seen Oracle databases recovered from snapshots successfully. Listening to MS they have added support for snapshots in Windows.NET and they are also saying that there will be snapshotting available on the next version of Exchange, but lets wait and see. The snapshots in .NET is more of a complete copy followed by delta's for each subsequent snapshot. EMC and NetApps use technology that provides instant snapshots as all it does it take a snapshot of the block allocation table and only if a block is about to change does it create a second block to keep a copy of the block as at the time of the snapshot. This obviously saves on space but if you have a mutliple disk failure does mean you could lose all of the data for that snapshot, though in one of these modern SAN's with multiple spare drives is very unlikely. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 1:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN If you cant restore it, whats the point? Is it safe to assume the same with a SQL or Oracle db as well? What about a AD global directory? I'm getting the impression that its good for file systems and file servers and not much more. e- -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN You might be able to restore one if you're lucky. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN You can take snapshot backups of the database. You can't restore them, but you can take them. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN I've seen Exchange 2000 run on servers that use a Hitachi SAN. There really shouldn't be any problem running Exchange on any high-quality SAN system. Don't believe the hyperbole, however, that you can take snapshot backups of the Exchange databases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 6:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: More OT: Hitachi SAN 2nd verse, same as the first... :p Anyone running a Hitachi 9900 V Series SAN? Or maybe just the 9900 series? Normally I wouldn't ask such things of an exchange group, but the diversity and technical expertise here is very good. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
I also have this problem and have not been able to fix it, even after trying to change the published date rangeI am baffled, we have ex5.5 sp4. Have checked clocks, date settings etc. Cannot put anything in a calendar except things that are happening now! Any ideas anyone, thanks Vanessa Watkins Royal Holloway, University of London -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 December 2002 13:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Smart hosts
We are running Exchange 2000 SP3 on two servers in the same organisation. The second one has only been added recently, and only has one mailbox on it so far. We set up the original server's SMTP virtual server to use a smarthost which is a UNIX server, as it isn't accessible from the Internet, and can't access it either. Now we've added the second server, and set up its virtual server in a similar way. I was expecting the two Exchange servers to communicate directly when handling messages for mailboxes on each other (i.e. in the Exchange organisation), but use the smart host for all other mail. However, this isn't what's happening. Instead, all messages for mail stores not on the same server are going to the UNIX system, and the format of the message bodies looks pretty odd (lots of 8-bit data, for example). The SMTP interaction seems to break down after the bulk of the message has been received, and the UNIX server claims that the Exchange server has gone away (timeout). A complication with this is that the primary address for all recipients in the organisation ends in a domain that is shared with the UNIX server. However, I've followed the instructions in Microsoft's Q321721 (shared address spaces), and until we added the second server, all messages were delivered fine, to mailboxes on both the Exchange and UNIX server. It's still only the messages between the two Exchange servers that have a problem. Should I be using an SMTP connector rather than just the virtual server? Can anyone shed any light on what's going on? Max Caines IT Services, University of Wolverhampton Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV1 1SB Tel: 01902 322245 Fax: 01902 322699 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retenti on=0
Two choices: 1. Do a Disaster Recovery to a standby server. Extract the necessary data to a PST. Admonish the user that important mail doesn't go in the Deleted Items folder. 2. Tell the customer he's toast and show him some best practices. -Original Message- From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0 Importance: High Hi, I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current backup. I know, that mails still probably are somewhere in exchange database, but marked as white space. Is there any way to get it back, or is it completely lost ? If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as quickly as possible ... Thanks a lot Honza Novak _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client
We had an issue with Comcast cable blocking PPTP for one of my techs in Detroit. Don't know about BellSouth. Have you called them and asked? What I've seen is that some DSL/cable ISP's will block VPN unless you have their business level service. -- Roger Haxton Network Administrator Sure-Tel [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Total abstinence is easier than perfect moderation. -- St. Augustine, Bishop of Hippo -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client Hi all. Does anyone here use BellSouth DSL service? I just got it installed and it is working great. However when I am on DSL, I can't connect to my corporate network with the MS VPN client. My setup at home is: Win ME or Win 2K Pro with MS VPN client BellSouth gave me Westell WireSpeed DSL modem I bought D-Link 614+ Wireless router. However my PC is wired. D-Link is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I have even tried to bypass D-Link and connected straight to the Westell modem. Still no luck. The Westell modem is actually a router with a firewall but as far as I can see it is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I can ping the external IP address of the VPN server. MS VPN client can see it too but it times out on Verifying username and password and gives error 650. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Borderware Mxtreme
Saw a webinar on the Borderware Mxtreme box. With this box and using their Borderpost Mail interface this looks like a way to (a) have an alternative to OWA and it's associated headaches (IIS Lockdown, URLScan) thus (b) close port 80 on our server so that 25 is the only open port. Am I missing something and/or over simplifying the issues? Anyone else looked at the product? Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Zantaz
Never heard of it. Do you have a specific set of requirements related to document retention? On 12/17/02 20:48, Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Anyone out here using their offline email vault product? If so what are your thoughts? Richard Johnson 212-589-6503 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Does this person work off multiple workstations? For instance using a laptop (using .ost files) and then using a desktop as well? One thing you might want to check out is Q article Q276248. My users have multiple workstations and can't understand why they keep getting duplicates and missing calendar items. I've told them to either dump using .ost files on your laptops or dump the unneeded workstation. Until then, this problem will persist. So we are no longer supporting people with multiple workstations. Fixed that little problem =] __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Add custom smtp header ?
Yes, it's quite possible. Fishing lesson for the day... FAQ | Outlook? | Slipstick! | Search? | header | joy -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 12/16/02 2:05, Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to add a custom smtp header to outgoing email with EX5.5 ? I'd like to add a X-CUSTOM-something: data to outgoing email. More than that, if possible I'd like to add that data from code running in a custom form. Any chances ? Heiko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AutoUpdate of Public Folder Calendar
Well, the cost of 'fr4ee' is sometimes much higher than one might think. There may be other solutions out there as well... The folks at Amrein at least have a long track record in the Exchange space. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 12/11/02 12:02, Schneider.Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, Thanks for the URL. I was hoping for a no cost solution, but beggars can't be choosers. thanx, rudy ;-) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: AutoUpdate of Public Folder Calendar http://www.amrein.com/apps/page.asp?Q=392 -Original Message- From: Schneider.Rudy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Exchange 5.5 SP 4 Outlook 2K I'm able to post my Public Folder\Calendar to our Web/Intranet; however, it's a static display and I'd like to update this automatically when I add/change/delete items from my Public Folder Calendar. I haven't found any ideas on how to accomplish this. All of the discussions I've found return me to just save as and this doesn't update automatically. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive (there's a tech article from MS somewhere). Neil -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: basic questions
In general, the vast majority of Exchange customers don't need to do anything with Exchange virtual servers or smtp connectors. The definition of domains is handled in the recipient policies and you'll need a policy for each domain being handled... Which will result in multiple e-mail addresses per account, but thankfully, in E2K they are auto-generated. The FAQ has some info on defining recipient policies I believe. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 12/10/02 12:45, Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Working on preparing my Exchange 2000 box to accept mail (The 5.5 server is doing this now). I'm a little confused about the relationship between SMTP Connectors, the SMTP virtual server, etc and how mail is routed by domains. For example... On my 5.5 server, my IMS is configured under the Routing tab to reroute incoming SMTP mail for a variety of domains to inbound (well, one is inbound, the rest route to that). This enables all users to have only one set of SMTP addresses (the one that routes to inbound) and all other domains get rerouted to that domain... Can someone point me to the appropriate place where I can RTFM? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Borderware Mxtreme
There are plenty of alternatives to OWA... Are you talking about using their mail client, or their 'proxy services' for OWA access? If it's the latter, do you know of any technical differences between their approach and that used by Whale communications? And.. Are those features compelling over say... An ISA server protocol filtering of OWA access? On 12/18/02 9:01, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Saw a webinar on the Borderware Mxtreme box. With this box and using their Borderpost Mail interface this looks like a way to (a) have an alternative to OWA and it's associated headaches (IIS Lockdown, URLScan) thus (b) close port 80 on our server so that 25 is the only open port. Am I missing something and/or over simplifying the issues? Anyone else looked at the product? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Borderware Mxtreme
Don't know but thanks for pointinng out some things I should look at. Jim -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Borderware Mxtreme There are plenty of alternatives to OWA... Are you talking about using their mail client, or their 'proxy services' for OWA access? If it's the latter, do you know of any technical differences between their approach and that used by Whale communications? And.. Are those features compelling over say... An ISA server protocol filtering of OWA access? On 12/18/02 9:01, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Saw a webinar on the Borderware Mxtreme box. With this box and using their Borderpost Mail interface this looks like a way to (a) have an alternative to OWA and it's associated headaches (IIS Lockdown, URLScan) thus (b) close port 80 on our server so that 25 is the only open port. Am I missing something and/or over simplifying the issues? Anyone else looked at the product? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Add custom smtp header ?
Argh. I *did* check cdolive and slipstick, but still missed it. And found it, now. Thanks Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Add custom smtp header ? Yes, it's quite possible. Fishing lesson for the day... FAQ | Outlook? | Slipstick! | Search? | header | joy -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 12/16/02 2:05, Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to add a custom smtp header to outgoing email with EX5.5 ? I'd like to add a X-CUSTOM-something: data to outgoing email. More than that, if possible I'd like to add that data from code running in a custom form. Any chances ? Heiko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blocking a newsletter
Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Add custom smtp header ?
CHECK THE FAQ's -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Add custom smtp header ? Argh. I *did* check cdolive and slipstick, but still missed it. And found it, now. Thanks Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Add custom smtp header ? Yes, it's quite possible. Fishing lesson for the day... FAQ | Outlook? | Slipstick! | Search? | header | joy -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 12/16/02 2:05, Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to add a custom smtp header to outgoing email with EX5.5 ? I'd like to add a X-CUSTOM-something: data to outgoing email. More than that, if possible I'd like to add that data from code running in a custom form. Any chances ? Heiko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
No you should let it go. It's a pretty good news letter. Check out the site and see what I mean, they basically talk about how screwed up some company policies are and they have good stories on them. Thus the name -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Borderware Mxtreme
No problem... Somewhere around here, I think I have an overview whitepaper on the subject. If I can find it, I'll mail it to you offline. On 12/18/02 10:09, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't know but thanks for pointinng out some things I should look at. Jim -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Borderware Mxtreme There are plenty of alternatives to OWA... Are you talking about using their mail client, or their 'proxy services' for OWA access? If it's the latter, do you know of any technical differences between their approach and that used by Whale communications? And.. Are those features compelling over say... An ISA server protocol filtering of OWA access? On 12/18/02 9:01, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Saw a webinar on the Borderware Mxtreme box. With this box and using their Borderpost Mail interface this looks like a way to (a) have an alternative to OWA and it's associated headaches (IIS Lockdown, URLScan) thus (b) close port 80 on our server so that 25 is the only open port. Am I missing something and/or over simplifying the issues? Anyone else looked at the product? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Add custom smtp header ?
Ah.. If you'd shown your work, I would have just passed on the slipstick URL. ;) On 12/18/02 10:09, Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Argh. I *did* check cdolive and slipstick, but still missed it. And found it, now. Thanks Heiko Herold _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
You could also argue that the content on that website leads to better business decisions within your own company, by pointing out the stupidity of others -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter One could argue that the newsletter is similar to subscribing to the WSJ newsletter or a Motley Fool newsletter, since it provides insight into companies which may be in your industry or which the user might be invested. I browse the f-kedcompany.com website once a month at least to see what's going on in the industry... I've even forwarded content to my boss. Not knowing what the company policy is though.. Not sure I can offer guidance. On 12/18/02 10:14, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped? Sure it is a fine line. Jim -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blocking a newsletter
Check with HR. Put the ball in their court. - Original Message - From: James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:23 PM Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped? Sure it is a fine line. Jim -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
If they forward that email, and someone gets offended, it's a different issue. But simply subscribing to it? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped? Sure it is a fine line. Jim -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blocking a newsletter
I just figure out whether I like the person or not, and base it on my personal opinion. It's good to be king! ;-) Alex - Original Message - From: Drew Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 09:43 Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter If they forward that email, and someone gets offended, it's a different issue. But simply subscribing to it? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped? Sure it is a fine line. Jim -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Jim, Phytoceutica is a big company that makes really complex medicine-thingies. You have access to brilliant lawyers. WTF are you talking to a bunch of techno-weenies for? Print out your AUP and go walk into your general counsel's office. -tom -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:24 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Blocking a newsletter Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped? Sure it is a fine line. Jim -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem
Hi, When any of our users add holidays in Outlook 2000, it adds them just fine for 2002 but not 2003. It's like they aren't reoccurring. We are running Exchange 2000 and have about 750 users. I have tried changing the computer clock to 2003 and then adding holidays but they still only populate 2002. I can't seem to find any KB articles on this. Has anyone seen this behavior? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem
Upgrade to Outlook 2002 and you will be good to go until 2005. - Original Message - From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:16 PM Subject: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem Hi, When any of our users add holidays in Outlook 2000, it adds them just fine for 2002 but not 2003. It's like they aren't reoccurring. We are running Exchange 2000 and have about 750 users. I have tried changing the computer clock to 2003 and then adding holidays but they still only populate 2002. I can't seem to find any KB articles on this. Has anyone seen this behavior? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem
Office 2000 does not include holidays past 2002. You will need to create or find a new outlook.txt file with future holidays in it. If you search Google or the archives you can find some links to new holiday files. Steve -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem Hi, When any of our users add holidays in Outlook 2000, it adds them just fine for 2002 but not 2003. It's like they aren't reoccurring. We are running Exchange 2000 and have about 750 users. I have tried changing the computer clock to 2003 and then adding holidays but they still only populate 2002. I can't seem to find any KB articles on this. Has anyone seen this behavior? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem
Find your outlook.txt file and manually add the missing holidays. Then, go back to outlook and re-add holidays. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem Hi, When any of our users add holidays in Outlook 2000, it adds them just fine for 2002 but not 2003. It's like they aren't reoccurring. We are running Exchange 2000 and have about 750 users. I have tried changing the computer clock to 2003 and then adding holidays but they still only populate 2002. I can't seem to find any KB articles on this. Has anyone seen this behavior? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Here's a couple links describing this issue. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788256bf3007f62b5/8b773850a36516fe88256c2f007e436d?OpenDocumentprev=http://search.symantec.com/custom/us/techsupp/enterprise/kb/query.html?*col=kb%20us*st=1*nh=10*pcode=*qp=url:/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788256bf3007f62b5,,,*qt=%2Bexchange%20%2B2000*miniver=sav_8_ce*sone=sav_8_ce_tasks.html*stg=*prod=Symantec%20AntiVirus*ver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition*base=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/*next=*boolean=andsone=sav_8_ce_tasks.htmlstg=prod=Symantec%20AntiVirusver=8.0%20Corporate%20Editionbase=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/next=src=entpcode=dtype=corpsvy= http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301234 Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive (there's a tech article from MS somewhere). Neil -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Those arent links, thats the whole pig. - Original Message - From: Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Here's a couple links describing this issue. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788256b f3007f62b5/8b773850a36516fe88256c2f007e436d?OpenDocumentprev=http://search. symantec.com/custom/us/techsupp/enterprise/kb/query.html?*col=kb%20us*st=1*n h=10*pcode=*qp=url:/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788256bf3007f62b5,,,*qt= %2Bexchange%20%2B2000*miniver=sav_8_ce*sone=sav_8_ce_tasks.html*stg=*prod=Sy mantec%20AntiVirus*ver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition*base=http://www.symantec.co m/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/*next=*boolean=andsone=sav_8_ce _tasks.htmlstg=prod=Symantec%20AntiVirusver=8.0%20Corporate%20Editionbas e=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/next=s rc=entpcode=dtype=corpsvy= http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301234 Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive (there's a tech article from MS somewhere). Neil -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Forums.somethingawful.com come join us in FYAD..you'll love it there :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Management knows I run scanmail with emanager and have the filter to catch profanity among other things. When a message meets the criteria it is archived and I look at the messages only then. I have already made the decision to make no exceptions and expect everyone to follow the AUP. Jim -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
I was some surprised when I pasted it. Sorry it was so long Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Those arent links, thats the whole pig. - Original Message - From: Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Here's a couple links describing this issue. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788 256b f3007f62b5/8b773850a36516fe88256c2f007e436d?OpenDocumentprev=http://sea rch. symantec.com/custom/us/techsupp/enterprise/kb/query.html?*col=kb%20us*st =1*n h=10*pcode=*qp=url:/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788256bf3007f62b5,,, *qt= %2Bexchange%20%2B2000*miniver=sav_8_ce*sone=sav_8_ce_tasks.html*stg=*pro d=Sy mantec%20AntiVirus*ver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition*base=http://www.symante c.co m/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/*next=*boolean=andsone=sav_ 8_ce _tasks.htmlstg=prod=Symantec%20AntiVirusver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition bas e=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/nex t=s rc=entpcode=dtype=corpsvy= http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301234 Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive (there's a tech article from MS somewhere). Neil -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
I have been away for awhile today but yes we do have NAV CE installed. How did you fix it if that was it. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions I was some surprised when I pasted it. Sorry it was so long Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Those arent links, thats the whole pig. - Original Message - From: Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Here's a couple links describing this issue. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788 256b f3007f62b5/8b773850a36516fe88256c2f007e436d?OpenDocumentprev=http://sea rch. symantec.com/custom/us/techsupp/enterprise/kb/query.html?*col=kb%20us*st =1*n h=10*pcode=*qp=url:/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788256bf3007f62b5,,, *qt= %2Bexchange%20%2B2000*miniver=sav_8_ce*sone=sav_8_ce_tasks.html*stg=*pro d=Sy mantec%20AntiVirus*ver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition*base=http://www.symante c.co m/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/*next=*boolean=andsone=sav_ 8_ce _tasks.htmlstg=prod=Symantec%20AntiVirusver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition bas e=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/nex t=s rc=entpcode=dtype=corpsvy= http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301234 Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive (there's a tech article from MS somewhere). Neil -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blocking a newsletter
Well, that opens an entirely different discussion. We drafted a consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file. In this day and age, with human rights litigation running rampant, a company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy issues. Alex - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47 Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Damn liberals keep screwing everything up -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter Well, that opens an entirely different discussion. We drafted a consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file. In this day and age, with human rights litigation running rampant, a company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy issues. Alex - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47 Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
block it all... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Damn liberals keep screwing everything up -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter Well, that opens an entirely different discussion. We drafted a consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file. In this day and age, with human rights litigation running rampant, a company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy issues. Alex - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47 Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blocking a newsletter
Damn Hummerts keep posting. - Original Message - From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:58 PM Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Damn liberals keep screwing everything up -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter Well, that opens an entirely different discussion. We drafted a consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file. In this day and age, with human rights litigation running rampant, a company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy issues. Alex - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47 Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
No need to shout. Yes he has the right, but it should be excercised with caution and the boss backing you 100%. But the way it the original message read to me ( and that perception has been cleared up) He could have been randomly sampling for his own amusement. He wasn't. I have known very ignorant or un-ethical admins. that would and do. Don't look at the clients email without a reason. He had reason and policy backing him, and he chose to stick with policy. Very ethical of him. rachel -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
We just went through the same thing pertaining strictly to emails. No personal emails that you wouldn't want the Company to see and access at all times to anyone's mailbox. In this day and age, too many lawsuits are swayed by emails that documented an employee or employer's actions. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Alexander Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter Well, that opens an entirely different discussion. We drafted a consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file. In this day and age, with human rights litigation running rampant, a company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy issues. Alex - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47 Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the right to review anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down simply because I am an Exchange Administrator? I don't think so. The company has that privlege, but unless they transfer that responsibility to you, I would be carefull. However, if it is something you would see in the course of doing your daily job, then that is different. Dennis -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
I hate those guys -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter Damn Hummerts keep posting. - Original Message - From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:58 PM Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Damn liberals keep screwing everything up -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter Well, that opens an entirely different discussion. We drafted a consent form that every employee must sign, giving us access to any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and it's kept in the employee's file. In this day and age, with human rights litigation running rampant, a company can no longer count on the common-sense approach to privacy issues. Alex - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:47 Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Blocking a newsletter
I disagree with you. As an Exchange Administrator, it is part of your job to look at other people's mailboxes, whether to troubleshoot a problem, or if asked to by their manager/supervisor. As any Mail Administrator should tell you, you are entrusted with being trusted. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the right to review anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down simply because I am an Exchange Administrator? I don't think so. The company has that privlege, but unless they transfer that responsibility to you, I would be carefull. However, if it is something you would see in the course of doing your daily job, then that is different. Dennis -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
My gut reaction would be to take a hit of diet pepsi and ask myself why I felt so
threatened by this newsletter. If i still felt this way after i finished the whole
can, I'd probably go and ask them why, and if it were not for work purposes I'd ask
them to consider unsubbing.
But then by the time I drunk a whole tin of pepsi I would probably have remembered
something else more important to the running of the network to do instead.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 18/12/2002 16:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Blocking a newsletter
Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely
ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work
address.
Jim Liddil
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: Blocking a newsletter
that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
No, no they don't. In fact, I know of multiple occasions in which people (including coworkers of mine) were fired for accessing someone else's mailbox without prior approval. Yes, the email is the company's property. That does not imply, however, that the admins can look through it at their leisure. In most companies, including every one in which I have worked, its an instantly terminatable offense. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
My gut reaction to taking a hit of Diet Pepsi would be to hurl. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter My gut reaction would be to take a hit of diet pepsi and ask myself why I felt so threatened by this newsletter. If i still felt this way after i finished the whole can, I'd probably go and ask them why, and if it were not for work purposes I'd ask them to consider unsubbing. But then by the time I drunk a whole tin of pepsi I would probably have remembered something else more important to the running of the network to do instead. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wed 18/12/2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,)瑳r(ﺷ \bಽ!豶 0 ꧑zǚ찱r�:.˛ m隊[hy⽴\z[,睰)r≄Z Zvh䲧+-i٢2G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
I disagree with you. As an Exchange Administrator, granted specific permissions, I have that ability. I for one, NEVER access users' mailboxes. Ever. Should there be such a need the manager of the person requesting access is granted access. Such access is not a 'right'. William Lefkovics -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions I disagree with you. As an Exchange Administrator, it is part of your job to look at other people's mailboxes, whether to troubleshoot a problem, or if asked to by their manager/supervisor. As any Mail Administrator should tell you, you are entrusted with being trusted. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the right to review anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down simply because I am an Exchange Administrator? I don't think so. The company has that privlege, but unless they transfer that responsibility to you, I would be carefull. However, if it is something you would see in the course of doing your daily job, then that is different. Dennis -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Of course they know... they made the decision to run it, right? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Management knows I run scanmail with emanager and have the filter to catch profanity among other things. When a message meets the criteria it is archived and I look at the messages only then. I have already made the decision to make no exceptions and expect everyone to follow the AUP. Jim -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
there is implicit trust That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not touching it. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Um, no. Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email. I have the ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts. The only tasks I do are ones that I have been specifically given. Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I could (rightly) be fired. If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied. there is a difference. www.dictionary.com? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title. As far as accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems them might be having? We open Users' mailboxes that are having problems, inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox with their credentials 3 or 4 times a day. We then ask them to change their password. But all Mail Administrators know that if you know certain AD accounts and their passwords, you can get into anybody's mailbox. But does that mean you should? No. I have never just randomly selected someone's mailbox and opened it to see what the contents were. But I have worked with some people who have done it. There's where the trust has to come into play. I even showed management that they had logged into some very highly sensitive mailboxes. They then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network and were eventually let go. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter there is implicit trust That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not touching it. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
This is from Symantec document:2002090916040948 Solution: Symantec AV only protects the file system on an Exchange server and not Exchange server itself. The protection of the Exchange server is the role of a product like Symantec AntiVirus/Filtering for Microsoft Exchange (SAVFMSE). Certain folders must be excluded from scanning by Symantec AV. If Symantec AV scans the Exchange structure or the SAVFMSE temp folder, it can cause false positive virus detections, unexpected behavior on the Exchange server, or damage to the Exchange databases. This is true of all antivirus programs running on Exchange servers. For more information, see the Microsoft Knowledge Base article XGEN: Recommendations for Troubleshooting an Exchange Computer with Antivirus Software Installed - ID Q245822. To access the Microsoft Knowledge Base, connect to http://search.support.microsoft.com/kb/c.asp and search for the specific article ID number. NOTE: The location of these documents is subject to change without notice. Symantec provides these links as a convenience only. The inclusion of such links does not imply that Symantec endorses, recommends, or accepts any responsibility for the content of such sites. For more information, see the Symantec Legal Notice. The details in the following sections cover the folders that can be safely scanned or need to be excluded when Symantec AV or other Symantec products are installed. File system antivirus software can safely scan the following folders: Exchsrvr\Address Exchsrvr\Bin Exchsrvr\Conndata Exchsrvr\Exchweb Exchsrvr\Res Exchsrvr\Schema Folders to exclude when using file system antivirus software: Exchange 5.5 Exchange databases (default location: Exchsrvr\Mdbdata) Exchange MTA files (default location: Exchsrvr\Mtadata) Exchange temporary files - tmp.edb NOTE: This file may be in more than one location. Additional log files (default location/name: Exchsrvr\server_name.log) NOTE: This file is not always found on Exchange 5.5. Site Replication Service (SRS) files (default location: Exchsrvr\Srsdata) NOTE: This file is not always found on Exchange 5.5. Inbox for Internet Mail Connector (default location: Exchsrvr\IMCDATA\IN) - MSE 5.5 Internet Information Service (IIS) system files (drive:\Winnt\System32\Inetsrv) Exchange 2000 The Installable File System (IFS) (default location: drive M) Exchange databases (default location: Exchsrvr\Mdbdata) Exchange MTA files (default location: Exchsrvr\Mtadata) Exchange temporary files: tmp.edb NOTE: This file may be in more than one location. Additional log files (default location: Exchsrvr\server_name .log) Virtual server folder (default location: Exchsrvr\Mailroot) Site Replication Service (SRS) files (default location: Exchsrvr\Srsdata) Internet Information Service (IIS) system files (drive:\Winnt\System32\Inetsrv) Exclude the Temp folders when the following Symantec programs are installed Norton AntiVirus 2.x for Microsoft Exchange drive:\Program Files\NAVMSE\Temp Symantec AntiVirus/Filtering 3.0 for Microsoft Exchange drive:\Program Files\Symantec\SAVFMSE\Temp NOTE: The exclusion of the above Temp folders is critical to the operation of the products. Each uses the temp folder as a processing folder. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (207)561-3549IP Phone: 13549 == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments I have been away for awhile today but yes we do have NAV CE installed. How did you fix it if that was it. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions I was some surprised when I pasted it. Sorry it was so long Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Those arent links, thats the whole pig. - Original Message - From: Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE:
RE: Blocking a newsletter
That's what I said in the beginning. You may the rights to do it, but that doesn't mean you should. I don't go anywhere that a manager or supervisor tells me to. We get User requests all the time asking for access to a User's mailbox that has left the Company. We bounce it back to them and tell them they need managerial approval. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Um, no. Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email. I have the ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts. The only tasks I do are ones that I have been specifically given. Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I could (rightly) be fired. If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied. there is a difference. www.dictionary.com? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Blocking a newsletter
I think you need to check the Dictionary.com site again. As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That implies not only the ability, but the sanction. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter That's what I said in the beginning. You may the rights to do it, but that doesn't mean you should. I don't go anywhere that a manager or supervisor tells me to. We get User requests all the time asking for access to a User's mailbox that has left the Company. We bounce it back to them and tell them they need managerial approval. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Um, no. Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email. I have the ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts. The only tasks I do are ones that I have been specifically given. Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I could (rightly) be fired. If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied. there is a difference. www.dictionary.com? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Funny. My dictionary doesn't have the word Exchange Administrator in it. Oh well, guess everything I said before you can forget. LOL Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter I think you need to check the Dictionary.com site again. As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That implies not only the ability, but the sanction. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter That's what I said in the beginning. You may the rights to do it, but that doesn't mean you should. I don't go anywhere that a manager or supervisor tells me to. We get User requests all the time asking for access to a User's mailbox that has left the Company. We bounce it back to them and tell them they need managerial approval. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Um, no. Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email. I have the ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts. The only tasks I do are ones that I have been specifically given. Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I could (rightly) be fired. If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied. there is a difference. www.dictionary.com? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: basic questions
Very true. FWIW: XCON: When to Create SMTP Connectors in Exchange 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q294736 William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions In general, the vast majority of Exchange customers don't need to do anything with Exchange virtual servers or smtp connectors. The definition of domains is handled in the recipient policies and you'll need a policy for each domain being handled... Which will result in multiple e-mail addresses per account, but thankfully, in E2K they are auto-generated. The FAQ has some info on defining recipient policies I believe. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 12/10/02 12:45, Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Working on preparing my Exchange 2000 box to accept mail (The 5.5 server is doing this now). I'm a little confused about the relationship between SMTP Connectors, the SMTP virtual server, etc and how mail is routed by domains. For example... On my 5.5 server, my IMS is configured under the Routing tab to reroute incoming SMTP mail for a variety of domains to inbound (well, one is inbound, the rest route to that). This enables all users to have only one set of SMTP addresses (the one that routes to inbound) and all other domains get rerouted to that domain... Can someone point me to the appropriate place where I can RTFM? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The onus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blocking a newsletter
IANAL, but I do know that the legality of accessing mail in a mailbox varies greatly depending on the jurisdiction. And since IANAL, I know better than to try and figure out whether it may or may not be legal for myself or someone else to do so. I leave that determination to the blood sucking ogres we pay to know such things. On 12/18/02 13:47, Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
That Tom is that rare jewel... a wise Texan. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The onus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Gee I never thought that what I thought was a simply query would go this far. As much as I think the f^ckedcompnay.com and internalmemos.com are eye opening one still needs to keep in mind that ones job is to enforce the policy. Management easily forgets what they agreed to until some employee gets bent about seeing a picture or reading something offensive. Then all hell breaks loose. And indeed as with any job there are ethics of behavior. Jim -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title. As far as accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems them might be having? We open Users' mailboxes that are having problems, inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox with their credentials 3 or 4 times a day. We then ask them to change their password. But all Mail Administrators know that if you know certain AD accounts and their passwords, you can get into anybody's mailbox. But does that mean you should? No. I have never just randomly selected someone's mailbox and opened it to see what the contents were. But I have worked with some people who have done it. There's where the trust has to come into play. I even showed management that they had logged into some very highly sensitive mailboxes. They then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network and were eventually let go. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter there is implicit trust That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not touching it. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
Event ID: 1174
Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0. Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from beginning to end. I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message. Event ID: 1174 Source: MSExchangeDS Type: Information Category: Security Description: An unauthenticated logon was attempted. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Got to love his wit. I have quite a bit of yours archieved as well -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk That Tom is that rare jewel... a wise Texan. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The onus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID: 1174
Did you turn up logging on the DS? This is exactly what it says. You could probably see complimentary entries in the security event log as well. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0. Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from beginning to end. I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message. Event ID: 1174 Source: MSExchangeDS Type: Information Category: Security Description: An unauthenticated logon was attempted. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
'Archieved' is a good place for them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Got to love his wit. I have quite a bit of yours archieved as well -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk That Tom is that rare jewel... a wise Texan. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The onus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Yea true the local paper just had a story about some thieves that were sending what appeared to be spam messages to companies in the area. From there they would get the out of office replies and then go rob those people blind knowing exactly how long they were going to be gone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The onus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Well, in Finland working for a telecommunications operator (little known fact :) and asp, just starting to look at logs, who sent what to whom would get me jailed up for up to 3 years without the appropriate permissions from the people involved :-P . It's like you were tapping somebodys phone but graver since you have the control you do when managing the systems. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18. joulukuuta 2002 23:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter IANAL, but I do know that the legality of accessing mail in a mailbox varies greatly depending on the jurisdiction. And since IANAL, I know better than to try and figure out whether it may or may not be legal for myself or someone else to do so. I leave that determination to the blood sucking ogres we pay to know such things. On 12/18/02 13:47, Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not have this kind of thing sent to a work address. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
Yea but the question is the word f^uck really something that violates a company policy? I know here that in that case it wouldn't be. But if it was used in a violent or s^xual context then it would be. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Gee I never thought that what I thought was a simply query would go this far. As much as I think the f^ckedcompnay.com and internalmemos.com are eye opening one still needs to keep in mind that ones job is to enforce the policy. Management easily forgets what they agreed to until some employee gets bent about seeing a picture or reading something offensive. Then all hell breaks loose. And indeed as with any job there are ethics of behavior. Jim -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title. As far as accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems them might be having? We open Users' mailboxes that are having problems, inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox with their credentials 3 or 4 times a day. We then ask them to change their password. But all Mail Administrators know that if you know certain AD accounts and their passwords, you can get into anybody's mailbox. But does that mean you should? No. I have never just randomly selected someone's mailbox and opened it to see what the contents were. But I have worked with some people who have done it. There's where the trust has to come into play. I even showed management that they had logged into some very highly sensitive mailboxes. They then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network and were eventually let go. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter there is implicit trust That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not touching it. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to
RE: Event ID: 1174
Did you check 279509. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID: 1174 Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0. Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from beginning to end. I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message. Event ID: 1174 Source: MSExchangeDS Type: Information Category: Security Description: An unauthenticated logon was attempted. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID: 1174
I saw that one, but it said it was a problem with 2000, which we aren't running. Perhaps it pertains to NT 4.0 also. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Event ID: 1174 Did you check 279509. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID: 1174 Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0. Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from beginning to end. I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message. Event ID: 1174 Source: MSExchangeDS Type: Information Category: Security Description: An unauthenticated logon was attempted. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
It's not up to you to tell what is or is not against a company policy. You don't have to understand it.. --B. There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer interprets the truth. -- Jean Giradoux At 13:37 18-12-2002 -0800, you wrote: Yea but the question is the word f^uck really something that violates a company policy? I know here that in that case it wouldn't be. But if it was used in a violent or s^xual context then it would be. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Gee I never thought that what I thought was a simply query would go this far. As much as I think the f^ckedcompnay.com and internalmemos.com are eye opening one still needs to keep in mind that ones job is to enforce the policy. Management easily forgets what they agreed to until some employee gets bent about seeing a picture or reading something offensive. Then all hell breaks loose. And indeed as with any job there are ethics of behavior. Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID: 1174
Looks like the security was set to Maximum on the DS. I turned it off. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Event ID: 1174 Did you turn up logging on the DS? This is exactly what it says. You could probably see complimentary entries in the security event log as well. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0. Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from beginning to end. I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message. Event ID: 1174 Source: MSExchangeDS Type: Information Category: Security Description: An unauthenticated logon was attempted. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2540307.stm -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Yea true the local paper just had a story about some thieves that were sending what appeared to be spam messages to companies in the area. From there they would get the out of office replies and then go rob those people blind knowing exactly how long they were going to be gone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The onus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
auditing admin access
Is there any way to audit use of System Manager and/or Cluster Administrator? I have checked security settings in ESM itself: when I right-click on the Org and go to Properties, then select Security | Advanced | Auditing, I see an auditing entry that applies to All. All the access items within this entry that are checked (success fail for: delete, change perms, take ownership, create children, delete children, add/remove self, write properties, delete tree, create public folder, create top level public folder, modify public folder admin ACL, modify public folder replica list, open mail send queue, read metabase properties, administer IS, create named properties in the IS, view IS status, receive as, send as) are inherited, though I don't from what since this is the Org level. Anyway, despite all these checkmarks, my security logs don't record any of the above events. Per Exchange 2000 Server 24seven, I audit AD logon events and AD account management, as well as logon events on the server. And I have message tracking enabled and keep 7 days of message tracking logs. None of the above tells me when somebody launched ESM and/or tried to manage the Exchange Server, which is what I'd really like to see. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Orphaned System folder (Sched+ Free/Busy)
Hi all. I ahve recently retired this Administrative Group that only had one Exchange 2000 server in it. The server got un-installed without any problems. But now I have this Schedule+ Free Busy system folder that used to belong to that administrative group and it is refusing to go away. It actually was orphaned (in the Properties/Replicas there were no replicas). During my attempts to get rid of it, I homed it to a test Exchange 2000 server. But that did not help getting rid of it. In ESM, I can go to Public Folders, View System Folders, I can right-click on the PF and select Delete. Then ESM prompts me to supply logon credentials. But it does not like any credentials that I give it, even though I give it the highest security credentials there are. It pops up the prompt 5 times or so and then gives me Access Denied. Is there a way to get rid of this folder? I think it is causing problems for users that used to reside on the retired server and have been moved to other servers (they get was not able to save you free/busy data in their Outlooks) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Event ID: 1174
Well, uh... an unauthenticated logon was attempted. What part of this is mysterious? - Original Message - From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM Subject: Event ID: 1174 Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0. Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from beginning to end. I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message. Event ID: 1174 Source: MSExchangeDS Type: Information Category: Security Description: An unauthenticated logon was attempted. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: Archie Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
Thanks for that -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 that's your answer then - see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;273263 -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2002 07:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 No still in Mixed mode -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 December 2002 12:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Are you in Exchange 2000 Native Mode yet? -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2002 00:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Interesting I don't have that function available. These are Public folders I migrated over from a Exchange 5.5 server via a pst file. They show as having email addresses already but if you right click, all tasks you only get Mail Enable it's as if Exchange doesn't know about the email addresses. Yet it works perfectly. I may need to recreated the Folders and copy the contents over to fix up the problem. Though looking at the default Folder Tree, it is set to MAPI Clients so I expect it will always create Mail Enabled folders which cannot be changed. Andy -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Andy, In ESM navigate to the public folder, right click, All Tasks, Mail Disable. Voila, Mike -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 09:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Is there a way to un mail enable a Public Folder? Apart from deleting and re-creating. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ:
Defragging (important???)
Hello, I was just perusing some threads, and caught some particular threads regarding defragging the message store. The one that hit me hard, was the person that found out that doom was eminent - because of a specific error code, found in the Event Viewer regarding the Exchange Message Store. Is the Exchange Message Store supposed to be periodically defragged??? Are there ramifications, if the Message Store gets past a certain point of fragmentation? I am not trying to avoid any research, and be lazy on this topic - but all I need to know, is YES this is an important topic, and I better learn more about it FAST, or NO - it's just something good to do once in a while. Thanks in advance for any advice offered, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Defragging (important???)
The message store manages itself and does its own nightly maintenance. It should be all you ever need. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Defragging (important???) Hello, I was just perusing some threads, and caught some particular threads regarding defragging the message store. The one that hit me hard, was the person that found out that doom was eminent - because of a specific error code, found in the Event Viewer regarding the Exchange Message Store. Is the Exchange Message Store supposed to be periodically defragged??? Are there ramifications, if the Message Store gets past a certain point of fragmentation? I am not trying to avoid any research, and be lazy on this topic - but all I need to know, is YES this is an important topic, and I better learn more about it FAST, or NO - it's just something good to do once in a while. Thanks in advance for any advice offered, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Defragging (important???)
Michael, there is an online process that performs this function by default on a nightly basis. It is beneficial (note: not even necessary, only beneficial) when: - you move a large amount of data from the store - you delete a large amount of data from the store In other words, don't worry about it. Go back to the Christmas party. Relax. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I was just perusing some threads, and caught some particular threads regarding defragging the message store. The one that hit me hard, was the person that found out that doom was eminent - because of a specific error code, found in the Event Viewer regarding the Exchange Message Store. Is the Exchange Message Store supposed to be periodically defragged??? Are there ramifications, if the Message Store gets past a certain point of fragmentation? I am not trying to avoid any research, and be lazy on this topic - but all I need to know, is YES this is an important topic, and I better learn more about it FAST, or NO - it's just something good to do once in a while. Thanks in advance for any advice offered, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking a newsletter
If it violates policy, let HR send out the order to block the specific word in emails. If someone's mailbox needs to be browsed and ripped through, let the C*O do it and the IT guy stay out of the way. In other words, there is no technical solution. It's up to a given company to determine what it wants its level of liability to be. If you don't like it, then do like Father Jack and yell, DRINK! GIRLS! FECK! a lot. Sure makes the day fly by. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Yea but the question is the word f^uck really something that violates a company policy? I know here that in that case it wouldn't be. But if it was used in a violent or s^xual context then it would be. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
