[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: In Italian to give birth is dare allo luce which literally means to give to the light. From the movie Under the Tuscan Sun (-: But navashok, you kind of left us hanging when you said to Steve: I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. So...? What comes after so? After so? Well, next think I remember, I entered a very unfluffy area, was graped by a hand holding me into dazzling neon light, saying in a hard and strange sounding language the equivalent to: It's a boy. Now I knew I took the wrong exit, I went for the cigar-shaped light, I should have had a lookout for the saucer-shaped one. No, Share, what I meant was, I was born by a woman, I owe my (physical) existence to her, and in anticipation of this event, my parents where holding a kind of ritual performance 9 month earlier, so how could I condemn this? I am not of a virgin birth (even though I am a virgo), but then that wouldn't really matter if I would be an escapist, but I am not. I still think life is good (at least potentially). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiLFV-xtZ0E See the beginning, he has an interesting take on quantum physics, creation as imbalance, and love. Also funny with some truth in it, he could be some kind of hidden gnostic. It was pretty funny how you described FFL to the newcomer. Except you left out one very important topic: jyotish (-: From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:56 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. No you didn't, you got pushed. Now that's what you say, were you there? No, I crawled out, I saw the light.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Well navashok, I hope life is for you more than potentially good. Even though that may be difficult for a Virgo (-: Hey I thought that photo you posted was very tantric. I feel so bad about being unclear with Buck. Meanwhile the karma has come back around: the plow has not returned to clear the street where my car was parked last night. grrr From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:21 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: In Italian to give birth is dare allo luce which literally means to give to the light. From the movie Under the Tuscan Sun (-: But navashok, you kind of left us hanging when you said to Steve: I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. So...? What comes after so? After so? Well, next think I remember, I entered a very unfluffy area, was graped by a hand holding me into dazzling neon light, saying in a hard and strange sounding language the equivalent to: It's a boy. Now I knew I took the wrong exit, I went for the cigar-shaped light, I should have had a lookout for the saucer-shaped one. No, Share, what I meant was, I was born by a woman, I owe my (physical) existence to her, and in anticipation of this event, my parents where holding a kind of ritual performance 9 month earlier, so how could I condemn this? I am not of a virgin birth (even though I am a virgo), but then that wouldn't really matter if I would be an escapist, but I am not. I still think life is good (at least potentially). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiLFV-xtZ0E See the beginning, he has an interesting take on quantum physics, creation as imbalance, and love. Also funny with some truth in it, he could be some kind of hidden gnostic. It was pretty funny how you described FFL to the newcomer. Except you left out one very important topic: jyotish (-: From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:56 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. No you didn't, you got pushed. Now that's what you say, were you there? No, I crawled out, I saw the light.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so..
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. No you didn't, you got pushed.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. No you didn't, you got pushed. Now that's what you say, were you there? No, I crawled out, I saw the light.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. No you didn't, you got pushed. Now that's what you say, were you there? No, I crawled out, I saw the light. I thought that happens when you die. You know, the light at the end of the tunnel.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. No you didn't, you got pushed. Now that's what you say, were you there? No, I crawled out, I saw the light. I thought that happens when you die. You know, the light at the end of the tunnel. Just make sure you only see the saucer shaped light. The cigar-shaped light is evil.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
In Italian to give birth is dare allo luce which literally means to give to the light. From the movie Under the Tuscan Sun (-: But navashok, you kind of left us hanging when you said to Steve: I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. So...? What comes after so? It was pretty funny how you described FFL to the newcomer. Except you left out one very important topic: jyotish (-: From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:56 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. No you didn't, you got pushed. Now that's what you say, were you there? No, I crawled out, I saw the light.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Steve, it's not quite as bad. I'm just pointing out one aspect, one POV. I was actually quoting a friend, who IS married and has three children. My path is not that of an escapist, and everything that Barry and some others said in response is actually quite valid too. I also crawled out of a mother's womb, so.. No you didn't, you got pushed. Now that's what you say, were you there? No, I crawled out, I saw the light. I thought that happens when you die. You know, the light at the end of the tunnel. Just make sure you only see the saucer shaped light. The cigar-shaped light is evil. I too, heard the cigar-shaped light *is* evil, but only if one is out of brandy. Its a metaphysical thing.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82utG7Q3G_k
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82utG7Q3G_k Cute. Fluffy is different than fluffer. Novashok is Turq's fluffer.An example to help you with your English http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-YEYOMfXbw
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
IT'S SO FLFFY! Love it, thanks navashok for sense of humor. From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 7:56 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82utG7Q3G_k
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
I have already written up a marriage invitation with my beloved in my heart and sent it to her in my dreams - http://youtu.be/72UKzesNfeI On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** OMG, Ravi! Awesome! Ravi and his Gopi's (dressed in the white part of the song) Auth, Emily, Raunchy, and all the other beautiful females here!) My Gopi heart flirts, with Krishna! O'Krishna, let the turq feel the flirt as Xmas past! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 On Feb 16, 2013, at 3:53 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: I don't think so either. You and I both know pretty much who is Indian by nature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3UAPNPffGw --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Well dear Obba - I certainly don't think the new-sorrow-less one is Indian but he certainly is an idiot or looks like one after having seen suckered by Barry and finding it a little too late to back out. Reminds me of our professor Feste and his damsel-in-distress number he played not too long too. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Ha ha, loved the video. And the baby elephant too - positively dancing in the waves. Very uplifting. From: obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 6:27 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You OMG, Ravi! Awesome! Ravi and his Gopi's (dressed in the white part of the song) Auth, Emily, Raunchy, and all the other beautiful females here!) My Gopi heart flirts, with Krishna! O'Krishna, let the turq feel the flirt as Xmas past! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 On Feb 16, 2013, at 3:53 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: I don't think so either. You and I both know pretty much who is Indian by nature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3UAPNPffGw --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Well dear Obba - I certainly don't think the new-sorrow-less one is Indian but he certainly is an idiot or looks like one after having seen suckered by Barry and finding it a little too late to back out. Reminds me of our professor Feste and his damsel-in-distress number he played not too long too. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Uncle Tantra will get back to you drama queens and your humiliating pile-ons, these get-Barry fests and get-Barry orgies. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:07 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Uncle Tantra, can you tell me a bedtime story?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Keep puttin' it out there Ravi - we know how hard to resist you are. Ha. From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:16 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You I have already written up a marriage invitation with my beloved in my heart and sent it to her in my dreams - http://youtu.be/72UKzesNfeI On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG, Ravi! Awesome! Ravi and his Gopi's (dressed in the white part of the song) Auth, Emily, Raunchy, and all the other beautiful females here!) My Gopi heart flirts, with Krishna! O'Krishna, let the turq feel the flirt as Xmas past! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 On Feb 16, 2013, at 3:53 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: I don't think so either. You and I both know pretty much who is Indian by nature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3UAPNPffGw --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Well dear Obba - I certainly don't think the new-sorrow-less one is Indian but he certainly is an idiot or looks like one after having seen suckered by Barry and finding it a little too late to back out. Reminds me of our professor Feste and his damsel-in-distress number he played not too long too. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
LOL..thank you dear Emily, you are very kind and generous. Love ya - Ravi On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Emily Reyn emilymae.r...@yahoo.comwrote: ** Keep puttin' it out there Ravi - we know how hard to resist you are. Ha. -- *From:* Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:16 AM *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You I have already written up a marriage invitation with my beloved in my heart and sent it to her in my dreams - http://youtu.be/72UKzesNfeI On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** OMG, Ravi! Awesome! Ravi and his Gopi's (dressed in the white part of the song) Auth, Emily, Raunchy, and all the other beautiful females here!) My Gopi heart flirts, with Krishna! O'Krishna, let the turq feel the flirt as Xmas past! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 On Feb 16, 2013, at 3:53 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: I don't think so either. You and I both know pretty much who is Indian by nature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3UAPNPffGw --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Well dear Obba - I certainly don't think the new-sorrow-less one is Indian but he certainly is an idiot or looks like one after having seen suckered by Barry and finding it a little too late to back out. Reminds me of our professor Feste and his damsel-in-distress number he played not too long too. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Uncle Tantra will get back to you drama queens and your humiliating pile-ons, these get-Barry fests and get-Barry orgies. Why do you think I posted what I did at the end of last week and the beginning of this one? A few posts calculated to push buttons, and then I can just sit back and watch people demonstrate to the lurkers how attached and reactive they are. :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:28 AM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Uncle Tantra will get back to you drama queens and your humiliating pile-ons, these get-Barry fests and get-Barry orgies. Why do you think I posted what I did at the end of last week and the beginning of this one? A few posts calculated to push buttons, and then I can just sit back and watch people demonstrate to the lurkers how attached and reactive they are. :-) Yes these women - they can't help being reactive, drama queens, all of them - Obba, Ann, Emily, Rauchy, Judy. I just tolerate them because they praise me you know - wink, wink - why don't they recognize that they are just stupid c#nts as you rightly put it, and that new cyber-stalker chick Carol - they get threatened by a real man like you.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Of course! Uncle Tantra invented message board threads! Turq is in control, and sits back because he does not wish to have to replace another keyboard. Pushing buttons and wanking gets messy sometimes! ;) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: Uncle Tantra will get back to you drama queens and your humiliating pile-ons, these get-Barry fests and get-Barry orgies. Why do you think I posted what I did at the end of last week and the beginning of this one? A few posts calculated to push buttons, and then I can just sit back and watch people demonstrate to the lurkers how attached and reactive they are. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. That's about as relevant as Larry Domash stating back in about 1977 with regard to the art department at MIU, Who wants to see a bunch of unstressing put up on the walls? (Speaking about displaying/hanging students' and professors' art work.)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. That's about as relevant as Larry Domash stating back in about 1977 with regard to the art department at MIU, Who wants to see a bunch of unstressing put up on the walls? (Speaking about displaying/hanging students' and professors' art work.) There is a difference though, Ann, a picture you can hang on the wall, and it doesn't talk back to you.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Well actually it's TWO sets of all that! Ours and theirs. Jyotish compatability can indicate what's dominant in a relationship and that can be helpful when the hormones and neurotransmitters are in tsunami mode. In my experience (-: Most relationships romantic and otherwise are a mix of dharma and karma which itself is a mix of positive and negative. From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 6:54 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. Thanks for noticing, as opposed to some who have a tendency to read anything I write through aversion- colored glasses. :-) As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Exactly. The odd Rama - Fred Lenz guy I studied with for a while described interpersonal interactions as touching and merging auras. Imagine a field around yourself as a luminous sphere, 2-5 meters in diameter. Now imagine inviting someone else -- who has an equal aura -- *into* yours. That's what you do when you focus intently on someone else, and even more so when you get involved with them. Although I certainly don't buy all that this guy said about the nature of relationships, I still like the merging auras metaphor because it allows a completely blameless view of why some relationships don't work out. A guy and a gal (or some other permutation best left to individual imagination) hook up, romantically and sex- ually. On their own, their auras are one predominant color (really combination of colors and energies), but put two of them together, and it's like the color wheels your kindergarten teacher used to use to explain the concept of color. Take a yellow circle of celophane in one hand and a blue one in the other, and they have their own distinct colors. But cross the two circles and you suddenly have a third color, green. That was Rama's view of what happens in relationships, and why one should never blame the other party if a relationship doesn't work out. Sometimes when auras merge, the resulting color is pleasing. Sometimes it isn't. No harm, no foul, either way. The secret to having relationships is just in recognizing when the aura you've chosen to merge with yours is not produc- ing a color that is equally pleasing to both parties. Color me a cultist (and some possibly will), but I think he might have been onto something with this metaphor. I like it because of its no fault cause. Deciding to share another person's whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, and well, Karma CHANGES your own. Sometimes the result works, sometimes it doesn't. No harm, no foul, either way. But *recognizing* the inharmonious color mergings, and choosing not to pursue them, that can be of value. Learning to recognize such things before they even start, that can be even more valuable. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Will you be my relationship coach, pretty please?? LOL --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. Thanks for noticing, as opposed to some who have a tendency to read anything I write through aversion- colored glasses. :-) As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Exactly. The odd Rama - Fred Lenz guy I studied with for a while described interpersonal interactions as touching and merging auras. Imagine a field around yourself as a luminous sphere, 2-5 meters in diameter. Now imagine inviting someone else -- who has an equal aura -- *into* yours. That's what you do when you focus intently on someone else, and even more so when you get involved with them. Although I certainly don't buy all that this guy said about the nature of relationships, I still like the merging auras metaphor because it allows a completely blameless view of why some relationships don't work out. A guy and a gal (or some other permutation best left to individual imagination) hook up, romantically and sex- ually. On their own, their auras are one predominant color (really combination of colors and energies), but put two of them together, and it's like the color wheels your kindergarten teacher used to use to explain the concept of color. Take a yellow circle of celophane in one hand and a blue one in the other, and they have their own distinct colors. But cross the two circles and you suddenly have a third color, green. That was Rama's view of what happens in relationships, and why one should never blame the other party if a relationship doesn't work out. Sometimes when auras merge, the resulting color is pleasing. Sometimes it isn't. No harm, no foul, either way. The secret to having relationships is just in recognizing when the aura you've chosen to merge with yours is not produc- ing a color that is equally pleasing to both parties. Color me a cultist (and some possibly will), but I think he might have been onto something with this metaphor. I like it because of its no fault cause. Deciding to share another person's whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, and well, Karma CHANGES your own. Sometimes the result works, sometimes it doesn't. No harm, no foul, either way. But *recognizing* the inharmonious color mergings, and choosing not to pursue them, that can be of value. Learning to recognize such things before they even start, that can be even more valuable. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
*chuckle* They sound like lots of fun!! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: Reminded me of yesterday when I called my daughter, who lives in San Francisco, and asked her what she was doing for Valentine's Day, and she said she was going out to dinner with three girlfriends, and then added matter-of-factly that they were going to pretend to be lesbian couples, to get the free champagne. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh Oh Obba, are you flirting with me? Watch out 'cuz it just might get me going and then couldn't we just give Barry an eyeful, that is if we'd let him watch, which I highly doubt. Now get going you little sassy-pants, no more of your lip for today - I'd like you to save them both for me tomorrow. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Turned out to be Proseco, but, yeah she had a good time. We had lunch yesterday - She is in her final year of school, so studying like a maniac, and then party time on weekends, so she had been up 'til 4:30 and sort of tired, but always fun to see her. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@... wrote: *chuckle* They sound like lots of fun!! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Reminded me of yesterday when I called my daughter, who lives in San Francisco, and asked her what she was doing for Valentine's Day, and she said she was going out to dinner with three girlfriends, and then added matter-of-factly that they were going to pretend to be lesbian couples, to get the free champagne. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh Oh Obba, are you flirting with me? Watch out 'cuz it just might get me going and then couldn't we just give Barry an eyeful, that is if we'd let him watch, which I highly doubt. Now get going you little sassy-pants, no more of your lip for today - I'd like you to save them both for me tomorrow. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE*
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Sweet. :) My daughter is still in college. I think it she could, she'd make a career out of being a student. Ha! That said, I do hope she continues as a lifelong learner. What is your daughter studying, if you don't mind me asking and if she wouldn't mind you sharing? Both my children were home schooled (through I prefer the term eclectic schooled) from birth thru high school. I hope I didn't damage them too much. Haha. And I hope they picked up on being life-long learners. Never too old... :) ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: Turned out to be Proseco, but, yeah she had a good time. We had lunch yesterday - She is in her final year of school, so studying like a maniac, and then party time on weekends, so she had been up 'til 4:30 and sort of tired, but always fun to see her. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote: *chuckle* They sound like lots of fun!! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Reminded me of yesterday when I called my daughter, who lives in San Francisco, and asked her what she was doing for Valentine's Day, and she said she was going out to dinner with three girlfriends, and then added matter-of-factly that they were going to pretend to be lesbian couples, to get the free champagne. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh Oh Obba, are you flirting with me? Watch out 'cuz it just might get me going and then couldn't we just give Barry an eyeful, that is if we'd let him watch, which I highly doubt. Now get going you little sassy-pants, no more of your lip for today - I'd like you to save them both for me tomorrow. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Cluck, cluck. Corn(stalk), Corn(stalk). ;) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:28 AM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: Uncle Tantra will get back to you drama queens and your humiliating pile-ons, these get-Barry fests and get-Barry orgies. Why do you think I posted what I did at the end of last week and the beginning of this one? A few posts calculated to push buttons, and then I can just sit back and watch people demonstrate to the lurkers how attached and reactive they are. :-) Yes these women - they can't help being reactive, drama queens, all of them - Obba, Ann, Emily, Rauchy, Judy. I just tolerate them because they praise me you know - wink, wink - why don't they recognize that they are just stupid c#nts as you rightly put it, and that new cyber-stalker chick Carol - they get threatened by a real man like you.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: Will you be my relationship coach, pretty please?? LOL Al lyou have to remember is that blue and yellow make green, red and white make pink, blue and brown make purple and so on. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. Thanks for noticing, as opposed to some who have a tendency to read anything I write through aversion- colored glasses. :-) As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Exactly. The odd Rama - Fred Lenz guy I studied with for a while described interpersonal interactions as touching and merging auras. Imagine a field around yourself as a luminous sphere, 2-5 meters in diameter. Now imagine inviting someone else -- who has an equal aura -- *into* yours. That's what you do when you focus intently on someone else, and even more so when you get involved with them. Although I certainly don't buy all that this guy said about the nature of relationships, I still like the merging auras metaphor because it allows a completely blameless view of why some relationships don't work out. A guy and a gal (or some other permutation best left to individual imagination) hook up, romantically and sex- ually. On their own, their auras are one predominant color (really combination of colors and energies), but put two of them together, and it's like the color wheels your kindergarten teacher used to use to explain the concept of color. Take a yellow circle of celophane in one hand and a blue one in the other, and they have their own distinct colors. But cross the two circles and you suddenly have a third color, green. That was Rama's view of what happens in relationships, and why one should never blame the other party if a relationship doesn't work out. Sometimes when auras merge, the resulting color is pleasing. Sometimes it isn't. No harm, no foul, either way. The secret to having relationships is just in recognizing when the aura you've chosen to merge with yours is not produc- ing a color that is equally pleasing to both parties. Color me a cultist (and some possibly will), but I think he might have been onto something with this metaphor. I like it because of its no fault cause. Deciding to share another person's whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, and well, Karma CHANGES your own. Sometimes the result works, sometimes it doesn't. No harm, no foul, either way. But *recognizing* the inharmonious color mergings, and choosing not to pursue them, that can be of value. Learning to recognize such things before they even start, that can be even more valuable. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Don't you just love it when the first word of your post is a typo? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Will you be my relationship coach, pretty please?? LOL Al lyou have to remember is that blue and yellow make green, red and white make pink, blue and brown make purple and so on. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. Thanks for noticing, as opposed to some who have a tendency to read anything I write through aversion- colored glasses. :-) As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Exactly. The odd Rama - Fred Lenz guy I studied with for a while described interpersonal interactions as touching and merging auras. Imagine a field around yourself as a luminous sphere, 2-5 meters in diameter. Now imagine inviting someone else -- who has an equal aura -- *into* yours. That's what you do when you focus intently on someone else, and even more so when you get involved with them. Although I certainly don't buy all that this guy said about the nature of relationships, I still like the merging auras metaphor because it allows a completely blameless view of why some relationships don't work out. A guy and a gal (or some other permutation best left to individual imagination) hook up, romantically and sex- ually. On their own, their auras are one predominant color (really combination of colors and energies), but put two of them together, and it's like the color wheels your kindergarten teacher used to use to explain the concept of color. Take a yellow circle of celophane in one hand and a blue one in the other, and they have their own distinct colors. But cross the two circles and you suddenly have a third color, green. That was Rama's view of what happens in relationships, and why one should never blame the other party if a relationship doesn't work out. Sometimes when auras merge, the resulting color is pleasing. Sometimes it isn't. No harm, no foul, either way. The secret to having relationships is just in recognizing when the aura you've chosen to merge with yours is not produc- ing a color that is equally pleasing to both parties. Color me a cultist (and some possibly will), but I think he might have been onto something with this metaphor. I like it because of its no fault cause. Deciding to share another person's whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, and well, Karma CHANGES your own. Sometimes the result works, sometimes it doesn't. No harm, no foul, either way. But *recognizing* the inharmonious color mergings, and choosing not to pursue them, that can be of value. Learning to recognize such things before they even start, that can be even more valuable. :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
On Feb 17, 2013, at 9:28 AM, seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote: Great post Barry. As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Nav, for your sake, I hope you can get off this wheel of rebirth as quickly as possible, cuz it sounds like it's a little taxing. On the other hand, maybe you aspire to be Shankara's greatest hero. Don't know if you are familiar with that quote. But yea, probably best to stay away from women. Wouldn't want to get any coodies. Loved this - unwilling to look at their own BS - Barry and navashok, instead coming with an elaborate belief system. Nav just needs to hang out with me for a day - he will then realize its his belief system that is actually so taxing. Or he would go - Ravi's a fucking maniac..LOL.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: All you have to remember is that blue and yellow make green, red and white make pink, blue and brown make purple and so on. This depends on the colour theory you are using. This sounds like mixing paints. With light blue and red make magenta With light blue and green make cyan With light green and red make yellow With light, blue and yellow make white With light, green and magenta make white With light, cyan and red make white With printing inks or paints, blue and yellow make black (but cyan and yellow make green), and so on. With artists colours though, colour descriptions are less technical, for example cyan is called blue as it is a bluish color, and depend on a lot of experience to blend and mix to get desired effects. Thus there are all sorts of fancy names for colours often determined by the pigment material out of which a paint is manufactured, e.g.: Cadmium Red Light Perylene Red Cadmium Yellow Light Hansa Yellow Medium Phthalo Green Viridian Dioxazine Purple Ultramarine Blue Indianthrone Blue Transparent Earth Orange Ivory Black Titanium White This discussion was brought to you on behalf of the now dead Clerk Maxwell, who invented or discovered the tri-colour theory of vision, and also wrote the first unified field equations, combining the electrical force field and the magnetic force field into a single theory. In physics colours are referred to by wavelength or if a mixture, by dominant wavelength. Thus a colour can be referred to as the hydrogen alpha line in a spectrum or 656.28nm elctromagnetic radiation. Here is a PDF document that describes a colour filter that could be used in motion picture work or for astronomy or a physics experiment; the filter is nominally blue (actually blue-green) visually, but it also transmits in infrared: http://motion.kodak.com/motion/uploadedfiles/Kodak/motion/Products/Lab_And_Post_Production/Kodak_Filters/W2-38A.pdf
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Yeah, the French got it right. Krishna and Radha, Krishna and Rukmini, Krishna and the Gopi's all for monogamy! Turq is going to Tell, us what polygamy is and how great it is! Please share with us about your mother and father, Turq. Did you have older sisters? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: The French had it right all along: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/01/world/europe/mazarine-pingeot-mitterrand-daughter-looks-back.html?pagewanted=all_r=0 BTW, I meant that the fact that Mitterand's mistress walked side by side with his wife in his state funeral procession was getting it right, not the secrecy that the family had to put on for the French counter- parts of the monogamaphobes. The secrecy, as it turned out, was entirely unnecessary. Almost no one in France had any problems with Mitterrand having a second family, no more than his wife did. I heard people discussing this all the time when I lived in France, and everyone considered it pretty normal. As for Ms. Pingeot herself, she has happy memories of being with a loving father. It's all the hypocrisy that some in Miterrand's government felt they had to impose on him that caused damage, not the open relationship he had with his wife and mistress.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkX7-CcVLVw --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Will you be my relationship coach, pretty please?? LOL All you have to remember is that blue and yellow make green, red and white make pink, blue and brown make purple and so on. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. Thanks for noticing, as opposed to some who have a tendency to read anything I write through aversion- colored glasses. :-) As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Exactly. The odd Rama - Fred Lenz guy I studied with for a while described interpersonal interactions as touching and merging auras. Imagine a field around yourself as a luminous sphere, 2-5 meters in diameter. Now imagine inviting someone else -- who has an equal aura -- *into* yours. That's what you do when you focus intently on someone else, and even more so when you get involved with them. Although I certainly don't buy all that this guy said about the nature of relationships, I still like the merging auras metaphor because it allows a completely blameless view of why some relationships don't work out. A guy and a gal (or some other permutation best left to individual imagination) hook up, romantically and sex- ually. On their own, their auras are one predominant color (really combination of colors and energies), but put two of them together, and it's like the color wheels your kindergarten teacher used to use to explain the concept of color. Take a yellow circle of celophane in one hand and a blue one in the other, and they have their own distinct colors. But cross the two circles and you suddenly have a third color, green. That was Rama's view of what happens in relationships, and why one should never blame the other party if a relationship doesn't work out. Sometimes when auras merge, the resulting color is pleasing. Sometimes it isn't. No harm, no foul, either way. The secret to having relationships is just in recognizing when the aura you've chosen to merge with yours is not produc- ing a color that is equally pleasing to both parties. Color me a cultist (and some possibly will), but I think he might have been onto something with this metaphor. I like it because of its no fault cause. Deciding to share another person's whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, and well, Karma CHANGES your own. Sometimes the result works, sometimes it doesn't. No harm, no foul, either way. But *recognizing* the inharmonious color mergings, and choosing not to pursue them, that can be of value. Learning to recognize such things before they even start, that can be even more valuable. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: All you have to remember is that blue and yellow make green, red and white make pink, blue and brown make purple and so on. This depends on the colour theory you are using. This sounds like mixing paints. With light blue and red make magenta With light blue and green make cyan With light green and red make yellow With light, blue and yellow make white With light, green and magenta make white With light, cyan and red make white With printing inks or paints, blue and yellow make black (but cyan and yellow make green), and so on. With artists colours though, colour descriptions are less technical, for example cyan is called blue as it is a bluish color, and depend on a lot of experience to blend and mix to get desired effects. Thus there are all sorts of fancy names for colours often determined by the pigment material out of which a paint is manufactured, e.g.: Cadmium Red Light Perylene Red Cadmium Yellow Light Hansa Yellow Medium Phthalo Green Viridian Dioxazine Purple Ultramarine Blue Indianthrone Blue Transparent Earth Orange Ivory Black Titanium White This discussion was brought to you on behalf of the now dead Clerk Maxwell, who invented or discovered the tri-colour theory of vision, and also wrote the first unified field equations, combining the electrical force field and the magnetic force field into a single theory. In physics colours are referred to by wavelength or if a mixture, by dominant wavelength. Thus a colour can be referred to as the hydrogen alpha line in a spectrum or 656.28nm elctromagnetic radiation. Here is a PDF document that describes a colour filter that could be used in motion picture work or for astronomy or a physics experiment; the filter is nominally blue (actually blue-green) visually, but it also transmits in infrared: See, how beautiful is all of that? And yes, as an art major I was talking about paint mix. But your descriptions of light vs paint vs ink gives a glimpse of all of the subtle permutations within it all. Just reading about the names of colours is like experiencing the subtler levels of creation and how delicate, infinite and almost imperceptibly varied they are. I know you didn't say all of that but just in reading the names of the colours that very thing came through. And all from a joke I was making with the Doc about Barry's aura story. http://motion.kodak.com/motion/uploadedfiles/Kodak/motion/Products/Lab_And_Post_Production/Kodak_Filters/W2-38A.pdf
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkX7-CcVLVw Thanks Doc. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Will you be my relationship coach, pretty please?? LOL All you have to remember is that blue and yellow make green, red and white make pink, blue and brown make purple and so on. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. Great post Barry. Thanks for noticing, as opposed to some who have a tendency to read anything I write through aversion- colored glasses. :-) As a friend of mine said it recently: if you date, it's not just a nice woman, but a whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, well Karma, and at some point, you ask yourself, if you really want all of that. Exactly. The odd Rama - Fred Lenz guy I studied with for a while described interpersonal interactions as touching and merging auras. Imagine a field around yourself as a luminous sphere, 2-5 meters in diameter. Now imagine inviting someone else -- who has an equal aura -- *into* yours. That's what you do when you focus intently on someone else, and even more so when you get involved with them. Although I certainly don't buy all that this guy said about the nature of relationships, I still like the merging auras metaphor because it allows a completely blameless view of why some relationships don't work out. A guy and a gal (or some other permutation best left to individual imagination) hook up, romantically and sex- ually. On their own, their auras are one predominant color (really combination of colors and energies), but put two of them together, and it's like the color wheels your kindergarten teacher used to use to explain the concept of color. Take a yellow circle of celophane in one hand and a blue one in the other, and they have their own distinct colors. But cross the two circles and you suddenly have a third color, green. That was Rama's view of what happens in relationships, and why one should never blame the other party if a relationship doesn't work out. Sometimes when auras merge, the resulting color is pleasing. Sometimes it isn't. No harm, no foul, either way. The secret to having relationships is just in recognizing when the aura you've chosen to merge with yours is not produc- ing a color that is equally pleasing to both parties. Color me a cultist (and some possibly will), but I think he might have been onto something with this metaphor. I like it because of its no fault cause. Deciding to share another person's whole set of Samskaras, desires, ideations, and well, Karma CHANGES your own. Sometimes the result works, sometimes it doesn't. No harm, no foul, either way. But *recognizing* the inharmonious color mergings, and choosing not to pursue them, that can be of value. Learning to recognize such things before they even start, that can be even more valuable. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Ah, I see that we're off to another week of insane Judylogic. This should be fun. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) Barry is just kidding here, folks. He knows you all know that citing past posts on the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. Welcome to another round of I always 'win' because *I* get to make up the rules. The rules seem to be: If someone *else* uses a search engine to search for things to use against someone they don't particularly like in an attempt to put them down or smear them, that's cyberstalking. But if *I* use a search engine to search for things to use against someone *I* don't particularly like in an attempt to put them down or smear them, that's...uh... something else. Sure, Jude. I'm sure that everyone here buys this. *Especially* coming from the person who has spent more time than anyone else in FFL history using search engines to dig up things from the past so she can use them to denigrate or put down the people she doesn't like. Tell you what...you keep claiming that the definition *you* proposed for cyberstalking doesn't apply to you, and I'll keep reposting your *own* definition of it every time you do it. That sound fair to you? :-) He also knows the last time he made this absurd claim a day or two ago, he got it even more disastrously wrong. 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). Only Barry could write this without the slightest sense of how inadvertently ironic it is. One thing is for sure, he can dish it out, but he can't take it. Unless, of course, he uses sadism because he's really a masochist and gets his kicks by being repeatedly humiliated. And again, Judy defines the rules. If someone reacting to someone she considers to be on her side in her petty cyberwars says something idiotic and ignorant and someone she considers on the other side of these imaginary wars calls her on it and points out the idiocy and ignorance, that's SADISM. Note how she completely ignores obba's claim that I took the time to snip and cut, when I did not remove a single word of the post I was replying to. Note how she ignores obba going totally, over-the-top, batshit crazy because (as I see it) she was affronted by me suggesting the simple truth, that most guys would sooner fuck a pig than some- one who thinks the way she does. Read over the language *obba* used below, following one of the things that Judy claims most upsets her -- a LIE -- and note that Judy fails to deal with either of them. Then draw your own conclusions about both of them. Can you say loons? I think you can. :-) :-) :-) I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) Barry is just kidding here, folks. He knows you all know that citing past posts on the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. He also knows the last time he made this absurd claim a day or two ago, he got it even more disastrously wrong. 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, All that I said... As if calling someone an idiot and ignorant isn't grounds for affront. You see Judy, he truly doesn't get it. Barry spits in someone's eye, stomps on their broken toe and kicks their dog and wonders why he isn't invited to the next party. Huh, what did I do? he asks. Ah, another loon. And one who chooses to demonstrate that she cannot tell the difference between pointing out that someone spouting idiotic and ignorant opinions is...uh...an idiot and ignorant. For Ann, this is exactly the same as spitting in someone's eye, stomping on their broken toe, or kicking their dog. Can you say drama queens? I think you can. :-) :-) :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) Yeah, she hurled this in an outburst of madness and anger on me. These words, coming from her, the master searcher, are just so absurd and hilarious, that I chose to not comment on it. It is indeed supreme self parody. You don't know if you should weep or laugh, can only roll your eyes and shake your head. I give her the credit that she is now much older than me, and is clearly loosing marbles. Her attempts at logic seem to be directed at figuring out how much she is still functional. Her posts are actual test to see if her mind is still functioning, as her mental abilities is all she really has and was ever proud of. It reminds me of this scene of a famous movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore?
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:br I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. Yeah, she hurled this in an outburst of madness and anger on me. These words, coming from her, the master searcher, are just so absurd and hilarious, that I chose to not comment on it. It is indeed supreme self parody. You don't know if you should weep or laugh, can only roll your eyes and shake your head. Agreed. And watch now as she bobs and weaves, trying to pretend that she didn't define her *own* longstanding behavior as what others have been calling it all along, cyberstalking. I give her the credit that she is now much older than me, and is clearly loosing marbles. Her attempts at logic seem to be directed at figuring out how much she is still functional. Her posts are actual test to see if her mind is still functioning, as her mental abilities is all she really has and was ever proud of. It reminds me of this scene of a famous movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY Were I tempted to find movie parallels for Ms. Stein, I wouldn't have to go much further than Annie Wilkes in Stephen King's Misery -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO20qU-VwgA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO20qU-VwgA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueHC7pgfYGU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueHC7pgfYGU There's even a resemblance between Judy and Kathy Bates, although Kathy is much more attractive: [Barry's fantasy image of Judy] Note: No search engines were used in the creation of this post, and neither the Internet nor Fairfield Life were searched in any way to create it. All links used are from a file of great quotes, links, and graphics that I created years ago and use occasionally to spice up posts. :-) :-) :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore? I can't help, but I find this type of quasi pornographic pseudo humor disgusting. I don't say this just to support Barry, it's simply against my good taste. It's about the same type of 'joke' Raunchy engages in frequently, I just think it's kind of adolescent behavior, tasteless, not funny at all. What I find curious is, that people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling.Sorry, I can't get this together, the way people post here in their own words, or what type of posts they support, and then claiming being Sattvic would help prevent the dangers of channeling. One has to ask oneself, if one obviously fails in discrimination on this gross level of existence, like the case of Robin clearly shows, how they could have the right discrimination on the more subtle astral levels. All those, who don't know what I am talking about should read the final chapter of the book CULT, the one before the epilogue. How could you cite a master manipulator, as this was a kind of authority in the field of human behavior? A person who once declared the Maharishi to be the Anti-Christ, yes I know he changed his opinion (opinion! not state of mind, but then he believes God died in 1945). Anyway, those who lack an essential sense of discrimination, an obvious lack of groundedness will have a hard time in the astral sphere, me thinks.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh Nailed it. One stud in the stable and it ain't Barry. ...as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly... Obba, keep the hits on coming...you're a poetic genius. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the short paragraph above the following words and statements as the ultimate allure for us readers: idiot, stupid, sexual prudes, spiritual fascists. Gee, don't know about the rest of you but I'm transfixed by this human who could write this way. In fact, I am downright infatuated with love/lust. Barry, you're the man. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore? I can't help, but I find this type of quasi pornographic pseudo humor disgusting. I don't say this just to support Barry, it's simply against my good taste. It's about the same type of 'joke' Raunchy engages in frequently, I just think it's kind of adolescent behavior, tasteless, not funny at all. What I find curious is, that people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling.Sorry, I can't get this together,
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Well done!! Another one of Barry's dirty little secrets. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: Now why would you say that Barry? I say bullshit. I think this is what actually happened. You made a miscalculation and made one too many posts ending at 50 - you are too paranoid about not having the option to respond and you usually play it safe and don't exceed 48 or 49. You would have loved to fire one or two salvos before calling it a night. You began to furiously count your posts from the last post count. No luck, they kept adding up to 50 every goddamn time. Now you were mad, pacing around the room agitatedly. Maya wanted attention - you ignored her. Well - the dogs - you had no fucking choice, you cursed the dogs and took them out for the night time walk. You couldn't take it anymore - the clock showed 00:00 hours, drifted off into a highly disturbed sleep - cursing and rolling in the bed - constantly checking the clock. But the stupid clock now showed 04:00 - you knew you had to calm down. You knew the walk along the church would not help plus it was too early for the dogs. What the fuck - no one on FFL would know - so you did the only meditation you knew - your old TM mantra for about 20 mins. And then started off writing at 04:30. *Ahem, I had a horrible night* - but then you froze. What the fuck were you thinking, were you losing your mind - no way in hell you would like others to know about your inner state of turmoil. Then you went backspace, backspace, full stop and continued *Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam.* On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:55 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh Nailed it. One stud in the stable and it ain't Barry. Sorry, not even close. But I'll answer because I've been wanting to rap about what it's like to live in a poly household anyway. Despite the fantasies that Raunchy and obba project onto me, I'm not interested in any of the women I live with. One is my best friend and we got over any romantic inclinations towards one another 15 years ago, and another is nice and all, but I would never have been attracted to her sexually in any of my lifetimes, nor her me. The third is...uh...4 years old, and I'm hoping that not even Raunchy or obba are going to make any tasteless suggestions in that direction. :-) But it really *has* been interesting -- and educational -- living in a poly household. Of course, I am free to date or sleep with anyone I happen to bring home, but *to* bring them home, even to dinner, to be fair to any woman I meet I have to pre-explain, By the way, you'll be having dinner with five people, not just one. THAT moment has been really fascinating. To their credit, most of the Dutch women I've been interested enough in to say this to haven't batted an eyelid. If they had, the way I see it, my intuition would have been WAY off in becoming interested in them in the first place, and that has only happened once. More interesting from my point of view is the shift that has taken place in my sexual awareness PERIOD over the last few years. I *never* find myself thinking, Wow, I wish I could get laid, or Wow, I wish I had a girlfriend, or Wow, I wish I could meet someone and get married. This kind of thinking NEVER HAPPENS FOR ME. EVER. I find that I no longer have any *abstract* ideas about romance or relationships or sex or wanting any of them. I *never* feel lonely, or that my life is lacking someone if I don't happen to be seeing anyone at that time. And I think that this is a Good Thing. What happens instead is that *nothing ever happens* on the plane of romantic or sexual attraction for me unless I meet someone who really, Really, REALLY attracts my interest. That pretty woman on the street? I may notice her, and appreciate her looks or her walk, but I've forgotten her two seconds after she's walked past. It's the same with women I have pleasant and friendly conversations with but just don't have that thing for. If that thing doesn't happen ( and no, Raunchy and obba, it *doesn't* happen in my pants :-), no thoughts of having sex or a relationship with them ever arises. I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. On the other hand, some of the most pleasant relation- ships I've ever had (some lasting days, others years) have been when *both of us* have felt the way I feel, Not Looking For A Hookup, Not Needing A Hookup, just running into someone and having both of us feel that thing, while *never searching for it*. That's neat. But don't let me interrupt your fantasies about what men are and how they think with any kind of reality. It's obviously more fun for you guys to project the ways that *you* would think and act in my situation onto me, so carry on...
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Ravi, this was a small masterpiece. I didn't know you had it in you, not only are you apparently this handsome dude but now your more subtle wit has revealed itself. I am a little awestruck. (Oh dear, Barry, does this mean I'm FLIRTING?) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: Now why would you say that Barry? I say bullshit. I think this is what actually happened. You made a miscalculation and made one too many posts ending at 50 - you are too paranoid about not having the option to respond and you usually play it safe and don't exceed 48 or 49. You would have loved to fire one or two salvos before calling it a night. You began to furiously count your posts from the last post count. No luck, they kept adding up to 50 every goddamn time. Now you were mad, pacing around the room agitatedly. Maya wanted attention - you ignored her. Well - the dogs - you had no fucking choice, you cursed the dogs and took them out for the night time walk. You couldn't take it anymore - the clock showed 00:00 hours, drifted off into a highly disturbed sleep - cursing and rolling in the bed - constantly checking the clock. But the stupid clock now showed 04:00 - you knew you had to calm down. You knew the walk along the church would not help plus it was too early for the dogs. What the fuck - no one on FFL would know - so you did the only meditation you knew - your old TM mantra for about 20 mins. And then started off writing at 04:30. *Ahem, I had a horrible night* - but then you froze. What the fuck were you thinking, were you losing your mind - no way in hell you would like others to know about your inner state of turmoil. Then you went backspace, backspace, full stop and continued *Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam.* On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:55 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
br--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:brbr --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote:br br --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:br br --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:br br--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:brbr --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote:br br especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on br here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought hebr had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his generalbr dis-ease.br br Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out thebr very worst of his sadistic tendencies.br br I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one ofbr Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba Januarybr before last:br br http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577br br Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-upbr posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts tobr brush off the first one:br br http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596br br http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675br brAhem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points:brbr1. I might also point out that searching the Web for informationbrto use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior.br- Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-)br br Barry is just kidding here, folks. He knows you all knowbr that citing past posts on the forum is not searching thebr Web for information to use against somebody.br br He also knows the last time he made this absurd claim abr day or two ago, he got it even more disastrously wrong.br br 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based br on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted,br was that she was an idiot and ignorant,br br All that I said... As if calling someone an idiot and br ignorant isn't grounds for affront. You see Judy, he br truly doesn't get it. Barry spits in someone's eye, br stomps on their broken toe and kicks their dog and br wonders why he isn't invited to the next party. br Huh, what did I do? he asks.br br Ah, another loon. br br And one who chooses to demonstrate that she cannot tellbr the difference between pointing out that someone spoutingbr idiotic and ignorant opinions is...uh...an idiot and br ignorant. br br For Ann, this is exactly the same as spitting in someone'sbr eye, stomping on their broken toe, or kicking their dog. br br Can you say drama queens? I think you can. :-) :-) :-)brbr
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
So FFL is the only place in your life where you act like an anti-social, misogynistic asshole? Sorry buddy, but I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell ya... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh Nailed it. One stud in the stable and it ain't Barry. Sorry, not even close. But I'll answer because I've been wanting to rap about what it's like to live in a poly household anyway. Despite the fantasies that Raunchy and obba project onto me, I'm not interested in any of the women I live with. One is my best friend and we got over any romantic inclinations towards one another 15 years ago, and another is nice and all, but I would never have been attracted to her sexually in any of my lifetimes, nor her me. The third is...uh...4 years old, and I'm hoping that not even Raunchy or obba are going to make any tasteless suggestions in that direction. :-) But it really *has* been interesting -- and educational -- living in a poly household. Of course, I am free to date or sleep with anyone I happen to bring home, but *to* bring them home, even to dinner, to be fair to any woman I meet I have to pre-explain, By the way, you'll be having dinner with five people, not just one. THAT moment has been really fascinating. To their credit, most of the Dutch women I've been interested enough in to say this to haven't batted an eyelid. If they had, the way I see it, my intuition would have been WAY off in becoming interested in them in the first place, and that has only happened once. More interesting from my point of view is the shift that has taken place in my sexual awareness PERIOD over the last few years. I *never* find myself thinking, Wow, I wish I could get laid, or Wow, I wish I had a girlfriend, or Wow, I wish I could meet someone and get married. This kind of thinking NEVER HAPPENS FOR ME. EVER. I find that I no longer have any *abstract* ideas about romance or relationships or sex or wanting any of them. I *never* feel lonely, or that my life is lacking someone if I don't happen to be seeing anyone at that time. And I think that this is a Good Thing. What happens instead is that *nothing ever happens* on the plane of romantic or sexual attraction for me unless I meet someone who really, Really, REALLY attracts my interest. That pretty woman on the street? I may notice her, and appreciate her looks or her walk, but I've forgotten her two seconds after she's walked past. It's the same with women I have pleasant and friendly conversations with but just don't have that thing for. If that thing doesn't happen ( and no, Raunchy and obba, it *doesn't* happen in my pants :-), no thoughts of having sex or a relationship with them ever arises. I actually look upon this as a fairly healthy and some- what more evolved way of dealing with sex and romance. Who, after all, would ever want to hook up with someone who has all these fantasies of the perfect lover or mate running around in their heads, so much so that they LONG for them or develop an abstract NEED for them? I don't know about you, but every time I've run into a woman like that and been foolish enough to get involved with them anyway, I've learned very quickly that they were never relating to me *at all*, just to the fantasies in their heads. On the other hand, some of the most pleasant relation- ships I've ever had (some lasting days, others years) have been when *both of us* have felt the way I feel, Not Looking For A Hookup, Not Needing A Hookup, just running into someone and having both of us feel that thing, while *never searching for it*. That's neat. But don't let me interrupt your fantasies about what men are and how they think with any kind of reality. It's obviously more fun for you guys to project the ways that *you* would think and act in my situation onto me, so carry on...
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Not only my attention is selective, but, please note that, what I comment on is with discrimination. That is to say, I NEVER approved him using the word cunt. In fact, as a foreigner, it is difficult for me to exactly gauge the exact impact and application of English words. AND: I clearly can approve things he says, but differ in my opinion about many other things, or the way he says things. But you and others explicitly praised Obba for exactly this diatribe, and even try to copy her, as seen below. From that, and many other things you say, and the way you say it, I make my personal evaluation of you, and it just doesn't cut it, sorry. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: Ah, I see that we're off to another week of insane Judylogic. This should be fun. :-) Translation: Barry really wishes I hadn't linked to those three devastating posts of Robin's: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) Barry is just kidding here, folks. He knows you all know that citing past posts on the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. Welcome to another round of I always 'win' because *I* get to make up the rules. The rules seem to be: If someone *else* uses a search engine to search for things to use against someone they don't particularly like in an attempt to put them down or smear them, that's cyberstalking. But if *I* use a search engine to search for things to use against someone *I* don't particularly like in an attempt to put them down or smear them, that's...uh... something else. Sure, Jude. I'm sure that everyone here buys this. Let me say it another way: Barry is just kidding here, folks. He knows you all know that citing past posts on the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. *Especially* coming from the person who has spent more time than anyone else in FFL history using search engines to dig up things from the past so she can use them to denigrate or put down the people she doesn't like. Barry is just kidding here, folks. He knows you all know that citing past posts on the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. He also knows that he and navashok have searched the Web more than once for information to use against somebody. Tell you what...you keep claiming that the definition *you* proposed for cyberstalking doesn't apply to you, and I'll keep reposting your *own* definition of it every time you do it. That sound fair to you? :-) Barry is just kidding here, folks. He knows you all know that citing past posts on the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. He also knows the last time he made this absurd claim a day or two ago, he got it even more disastrously wrong. 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). Only Barry could write this without the slightest sense of how inadvertently ironic it is. One thing is for sure, he can dish it out, but he can't take it. Unless, of course, he uses sadism because he's really a masochist and gets his kicks by being repeatedly humiliated. And again, Judy defines the rules. If someone reacting to someone she considers to be on her side in her petty cyberwars says something idiotic and ignorant and someone she considers on the other side of these imaginary wars calls her on it and points out the idiocy and ignorance, that's SADISM. One thing is for sure, he can dish it out, but he can't take it. Unless, of course, he uses sadism because he's really a masochist and gets his kicks by being repeatedly humiliated. As Ann put it, Barry is a freak of nature. Note how she completely ignores obba's claim that I took the time to snip and cut,
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) Yeah, she hurled this in an outburst of madness and anger on me. These words, coming from her, the master searcher, are just so absurd and hilarious, that I chose to not comment on it. Says navashok, choosing to comment on it. Oh, by the way, he also knows that citing past posts from the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. And he knows he has more than once searched the Web for information to use against somebody (most recently against me--and he lied about what he found, too, and then lied again about what I had said regarding his lie). Barry and navashok both buried themselves in embarrassment over navashok's most recent cyberstalking attempt. Unfortunately their attempts to dig themselves out have only resulted in piling that embarrassment higher. And they're not finished yet. Stay tuned, folks. It is indeed supreme self parody. You don't know if you should weep or laugh, can only roll your eyes and shake your head. I give her the credit that she is now much older than me, and is clearly loosing marbles. Her attempts at logic seem to be directed at figuring out how much she is still functional. Her posts are actual test to see if her mind is still functioning, as her mental abilities is all she really has and was ever proud of. It reminds me of this scene of a famous movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:br I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. Yeah, she hurled this in an outburst of madness and anger on me. These words, coming from her, the master searcher, are just so absurd and hilarious, that I chose to not comment on it. It is indeed supreme self parody. You don't know if you should weep or laugh, can only roll your eyes and shake your head. Agreed. And watch now as she bobs and weaves, trying to pretend that she didn't define her *own* longstanding behavior as what others have been calling it all along, cyberstalking. What did I tell you? We can keep this up as long as necessary. Barry and navashok both know that citing past posts on the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. I mean, if Barry wants to characterize the three FFL posts of Robin's that I cited as information, he's more than welcome. ;-) Here's just one selection of what Barry is calling information from one of Robin's posts: How much, I ask readers of FFL, sincerity and contact with truth and passion and intelligent perception do these two sentences of Barry's contain? How much reality gets into them? How much of Barry gets into them? They are lifeless, impotent, sexless. Just dead rhetoric. Where is the experiential basistherefore the honest feelingevident in these two sentences. The person who wrote them felt nothing. He did not, then, attempt to convince of us of anything. A zombie could have written these two sentences. Where's the beef, Barry? Where's the commitment? You are letting a string of words do the work for you of your heart. Meanwhile that heart is stone. There is no context here, and no subtexteven unconsciously. Therefore one can only conclude, by the sterility of the affect behind these words, that the person is determined not to make himself vulnerableeven to his own desire to get back at the persons who called him out on his post to obbajeeba. Barry takes no chances. He writes in a metaphysical monotone. There is no hope, no faith, no desire in his writing. It's all Middle C without the music. ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) I give her the credit that she is now much older than me, and is clearly loosing marbles. Her attempts at logic seem to be directed at figuring out how much she is still functional. Her posts are actual test to see if her mind is still functioning, as her mental abilities is all she really has and was ever proud of. It reminds me of this scene of a famous movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY Were I tempted to find movie parallels for Ms. Stein, I wouldn't have to go much further than Annie Wilkes in Stephen King's Misery -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO20qU-VwgA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO20qU-VwgA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueHC7pgfYGU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueHC7pgfYGU There's even a resemblance between Judy and Kathy Bates, although Kathy is much more attractive: [Barry's fantasy image of Judy] Note: No search engines were used in the creation of this post, and neither the Internet nor Fairfield Life were searched in any way to create it. All links used are from a file of great quotes, links, and graphics that I created years ago and use occasionally to spice up posts. :-) :-) :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
br--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@... wrote: Nailed it. One stud in the stable and it ain't Barry. ...as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly... Obba, keep the hits on coming...you're a poetic genius. I agree. You can disagree whether or not it was a little too harsh, but as poetry, and as a put down, it was a gem.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
! The turq is bitten by the angel of beautiful women (flirting?). --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: Now why would you say that Barry? I say bullshit. I think this is what actually happened. You made a miscalculation and made one too many posts ending at 50 - you are too paranoid about not having the option to respond and you usually play it safe and don't exceed 48 or 49. You would have loved to fire one or two salvos before calling it a night. You began to furiously count your posts from the last post count. No luck, they kept adding up to 50 every goddamn time. Now you were mad, pacing around the room agitatedly. Maya wanted attention - you ignored her. Well - the dogs - you had no fucking choice, you cursed the dogs and took them out for the night time walk. You couldn't take it anymore - the clock showed 00:00 hours, drifted off into a highly disturbed sleep - cursing and rolling in the bed - constantly checking the clock. But the stupid clock now showed 04:00 - you knew you had to calm down. You knew the walk along the church would not help plus it was too early for the dogs. What the fuck - no one on FFL would know - so you did the only meditation you knew - your old TM mantra for about 20 mins. And then started off writing at 04:30. *Ahem, I had a horrible night* - but then you froze. What the fuck were you thinking, were you losing your mind - no way in hell you would like others to know about your inner state of turmoil. Then you went backspace, backspace, full stop and continued *Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam.* On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:55 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life,
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Thank you dear Ann. Yes - Barry's beliefs, bogus spirituality is one of invulnerability and your response would indeed be considered flirting, a sign of weakness, being a needy drama queen, an attention slut. If it had been just the routine patriarchal, stoic, stiff-upper-lip variety of remaining invulnerable we would have been not been exposed to this level of toxicity. But no - any sign of vulnerability is processed by his paranoid, delusional fantasies - constructed I'm sure to numb some traumatic pain of his - and he lashes out in a very perverse, sadistic manner - very sad. But there's little hope in cases like this since I myself was exposed to this and had to learn it the hard way, though in my case the perpretrator's belief system was Hindu, one of an Amma true believer. Thank god - all this never caused me to be a non-believer or numb myself to reality and I continued to remain vulnerable - incredibly more vulnerable than ever in fact. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ** Ravi, this was a small masterpiece. I didn't know you had it in you, not only are you apparently this handsome dude but now your more subtle wit has revealed itself. I am a little awestruck. (Oh dear, Barry, does this mean I'm FLIRTING?) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: Now why would you say that Barry? I say bullshit. I think this is what actually happened. You made a miscalculation and made one too many posts ending at 50 - you are too paranoid about not having the option to respond and you usually play it safe and don't exceed 48 or 49. You would have loved to fire one or two salvos before calling it a night. You began to furiously count your posts from the last post count. No luck, they kept adding up to 50 every goddamn time. Now you were mad, pacing around the room agitatedly. Maya wanted attention - you ignored her. Well - the dogs - you had no fucking choice, you cursed the dogs and took them out for the night time walk. You couldn't take it anymore - the clock showed 00:00 hours, drifted off into a highly disturbed sleep - cursing and rolling in the bed - constantly checking the clock. But the stupid clock now showed 04:00 - you knew you had to calm down. You knew the walk along the church would not help plus it was too early for the dogs. What the fuck - no one on FFL would know - so you did the only meditation you knew - your old TM mantra for about 20 mins. And then started off writing at 04:30. *Ahem, I had a horrible night* - but then you froze. What the fuck were you thinking, were you losing your mind - no way in hell you would like others to know about your inner state of turmoil. Then you went backspace, backspace, full stop and continued *Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam.* On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:55 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Thank you Dr. Du M. Bass. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:26 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Well done!! Another one of Barry's dirty little secrets. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: Now why would you say that Barry? I say bullshit. I think this is what actually happened. You made a miscalculation and made one too many posts ending at 50 - you are too paranoid about not having the option to respond and you usually play it safe and don't exceed 48 or 49. You would have loved to fire one or two salvos before calling it a night. You began to furiously count your posts from the last post count. No luck, they kept adding up to 50 every goddamn time. Now you were mad, pacing around the room agitatedly. Maya wanted attention - you ignored her. Well - the dogs - you had no fucking choice, you cursed the dogs and took them out for the night time walk. You couldn't take it anymore - the clock showed 00:00 hours, drifted off into a highly disturbed sleep - cursing and rolling in the bed - constantly checking the clock. But the stupid clock now showed 04:00 - you knew you had to calm down. You knew the walk along the church would not help plus it was too early for the dogs. What the fuck - no one on FFL would know - so you did the only meditation you knew - your old TM mantra for about 20 mins. And then started off writing at 04:30. *Ahem, I had a horrible night* - but then you froze. What the fuck were you thinking, were you losing your mind - no way in hell you would like others to know about your inner state of turmoil. Then you went backspace, backspace, full stop and continued *Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam.* On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:55 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself,
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:br I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. Yeah, she hurled this in an outburst of madness and anger on me. These words, coming from her, the master searcher, are just so absurd and hilarious, that I chose to not comment on it. It is indeed supreme self parody. You don't know if you should weep or laugh, can only roll your eyes and shake your head. Agreed. And watch now as she bobs and weaves, trying to pretend that she didn't define her *own* longstanding behavior as what others have been calling it all along, cyberstalking. What did I tell you? We can keep this up as long as necessary. Barry and navashok both know that citing past posts on the forum is not searching the Web for information to use against somebody. I mean, if Barry wants to characterize the three FFL posts of Robin's that I cited as information, he's more than welcome. ;-) Here's just one selection of what Barry is calling information from one of Robin's posts: How much, I ask readers of FFL, sincerity and contact with truth and passion and intelligent perception do these two sentences of Barry's contain? How much reality gets into them? How much of Barry gets into them? They are lifeless, impotent, sexless. Just dead rhetoric. Where is the experiential basistherefore the honest feelingevident in these two sentences. The person who wrote them felt nothing. He did not, then, attempt to convince of us of anything. A zombie could have written these two sentences. Where's the beef, Barry? Where's the commitment? You are letting a string of words do the work for you of your heart. Meanwhile that heart is stone. There is no context here, and no subtexteven unconsciously. Therefore one can only conclude, by the sterility of the affect behind these words, that the person is determined not to make himself vulnerableeven to his own desire to get back at the persons who called him out on his post to obbajeeba. Barry takes no chances. He writes in a metaphysical monotone. There is no hope, no faith, no desire in his writing. It's all Middle C without the music. ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) I give her the credit that she is now much older than me, and is clearly loosing marbles. Her attempts at logic seem to be directed at figuring out how much she is still functional. Her posts are actual test to see if her mind is still functioning, as her mental abilities is all she really has and was ever proud of. It reminds me of this scene of a famous movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY Were I tempted to find movie parallels for Ms. Stein, I wouldn't have to go much further than Annie Wilkes in Stephen King's Misery -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO20qU-VwgA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO20qU-VwgA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueHC7pgfYGU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueHC7pgfYGU There's even a resemblance between Judy and Kathy Bates, although Kathy is much more attractive: [Barry's fantasy image of Judy] Note: No search engines were used in the creation of this post, and neither the Internet nor Fairfield Life were searched in any way to create it. All links used are from a file of great quotes, links, and graphics that I created years ago and use occasionally to spice up posts. :-) :-) :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Well dear Obba - I certainly don't think the new-sorrow-less one is Indian but he certainly is an idiot or looks like one after having seen suckered by Barry and finding it a little too late to back out. Reminds me of our professor Feste and his damsel-in-distress number he played not too long too. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Good, Navashucks, precisely the intent for one to find it disgusting. Your new English read it correctly, your understanding, that is another story, dear. :) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore? I can't help, but I find this type of quasi pornographic pseudo humor disgusting. I don't say this just to support Barry, it's simply against my good taste. It's about the same type of 'joke' Raunchy engages in frequently, I just think it's kind of adolescent behavior, tasteless, not funny at all. What I find curious is, that people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling.Sorry, I can't get this together, the way people post here in their own words, or what type of posts they support, and then claiming being Sattvic would help prevent the dangers of channeling. One has to ask oneself, if one obviously fails in discrimination on this gross level of existence, like the case of Robin clearly shows, how they could have the right discrimination on the more subtle astral levels. All those, who don't know what I am talking about should read the final chapter of the book CULT, the one before the epilogue. How could you cite a master manipulator, as this was a kind of authority in the field of human behavior? A person who once declared the Maharishi to be the Anti-Christ, yes I know he changed his opinion (opinion! not state
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
I don't think so either. You and I both know pretty much who is Indian by nature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3UAPNPffGw --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Well dear Obba - I certainly don't think the new-sorrow-less one is Indian but he certainly is an idiot or looks like one after having seen suckered by Barry and finding it a little too late to back out. Reminds me of our professor Feste and his damsel-in-distress number he played not too long too. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@... wrote: (snip) One has to ask oneself, if one obviously fails in discrimination on this gross level of existence, like the case of Robin clearly shows, how they could have the right discrimination on the more subtle astral levels. All those, who don't know what I am talking about should read the final chapter of the book CULT, the one before the epilogue. How could you cite a master manipulator, as this was a kind of authority in the field of human behavior? Who has cited Robin during the period covered by Cult as an authority in the field of human behavior? A person who once declared the Maharishi to be the Anti-Christ, Ooops, you forgot to add, according to Bill Howell. yes I know he changed his opinion (opinion! not state of mind, And which state of mind would that be? Navashok is not, to say the least, the most reliable source of information concerning Robin's beliefs: but then he believes God died in 1945). Not died, simply ceased to take an active interest in the world (and this was in 1944, not 1945). Anyway, those who lack an essential sense of discrimination, an obvious lack of groundedness will have a hard time in the astral sphere, me thinks. Intrestingly enough, navashok has vehemently denied that he has ever had an anti-Robin agenda, while repeatedly and gratuitously taking shots at him, even in his absence from the forum. (Not to mention navashok's cyberstalking activities to find material on the Web to use against Robin, also in his absence.) Navashok also denies that he, navashok, is a liar. Don't know about anybody else, but I would say both those denials (among other behaviors) demonstrate the lack of an essential sense of discrimination. Hope navashok isn't messing around in the astral spheres.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Can you really blame him, Alex? Given Barry's fondness for...well, Barry, Nevah-evah would be worn out in a heartbeat, as his fluffer. Cramped fingers, sore lips, the whole thing would be too much. On the other hand, the show must go on, so I'll temper my empathy towards him with that in mind. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: Can you really blame him, Alex? Given Barry's fondness for... well, Barry, Nevah-evah would be worn out in a heartbeat, as his fluffer. Cramped fingers, sore lips, the whole thing would be too much. On the other hand, the show must go on, so I'll temper my empathy towards him with that in mind. Does explain the periods when Barry's posts are unusually... uh...limp, though. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
He does do a lot of dry humping on here, kinda like a yappy toy dog mounting everyone's leg, trying to fuck their shoe. Or sullenly taking a piss in the corner. Gotta keep that rolled up newspaper handy. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Can you really blame him, Alex? Given Barry's fondness for... well, Barry, Nevah-evah would be worn out in a heartbeat, as his fluffer. Cramped fingers, sore lips, the whole thing would be too much. On the other hand, the show must go on, so I'll temper my empathy towards him with that in mind. Does explain the periods when Barry's posts are unusually... uh...limp, though. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 On Feb 16, 2013, at 3:53 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: I don't think so either. You and I both know pretty much who is Indian by nature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3UAPNPffGw --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Well dear Obba - I certainly don't think the new-sorrow-less one is Indian but he certainly is an idiot or looks like one after having seen suckered by Barry and finding it a little too late to back out. Reminds me of our professor Feste and his damsel-in-distress number he played not too long too. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn,
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Limp and dry humping...Ha! The Jiva that couldn't. LOL --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Can you really blame him, Alex? Given Barry's fondness for... well, Barry, Nevah-evah would be worn out in a heartbeat, as his fluffer. Cramped fingers, sore lips, the whole thing would be too much. On the other hand, the show must go on, so I'll temper my empathy towards him with that in mind. Does explain the periods when Barry's posts are unusually... uh...limp, though. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
br--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrotr: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 At 3:35 comes a familiar verse.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
OMG, Ravi! Awesome! Ravi and his Gopi's (dressed in the white part of the song) Auth, Emily, Raunchy, and all the other beautiful females here!) My Gopi heart flirts, with Krishna! O'Krishna, let the turq feel the flirt as Xmas past! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 On Feb 16, 2013, at 3:53 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: I don't think so either. You and I both know pretty much who is Indian by nature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3UAPNPffGw --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Well dear Obba - I certainly don't think the new-sorrow-less one is Indian but he certainly is an idiot or looks like one after having seen suckered by Barry and finding it a little too late to back out. Reminds me of our professor Feste and his damsel-in-distress number he played not too long too. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you for the support. Navashok, if a woman is being raped or had been raped and it was happening again, and instead of her turning into a frigid waste or committing suicide, and think about the woman who was raped by all those men in India, if she had the knowledge to fuck them dudes back, in some way or to lesson those types from doing the same, it would be something repulsive that most men (or male or female rapists) find distasteful. Navashok, who is Kali? Who is Durga? Navashok, your name is not of a real Indian, that you may cherish principals of what you call vedic, but could know you may have a birth name like Fred? A Christian background you came from and that is one you mirror from? Patriarchal sadness. :( --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling. I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned good creative writing too! First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to ride. Next, your attention is very selective. Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 Now, *that's* an ISKCON I could groove to!
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Fluffer? Like using one of these is more like it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWTBxFocCzg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
You sure you don't mean Flipper? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azEOeTX1LqM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: Fluffer? Like using one of these is more like it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWTBxFocCzg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: The turq of navashok? Yes, I typed, The turq (of) navashok. Are these two of the same? I mean, are they both the same man, typing away? No, Barry is Barry, and Novashok is his fluffer. Novashok's shtick is to subscribe, post for a while, unsubscribe, then resubscribe under a new username, lather, rinse, repeat.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
On Feb 16, 2013, at 6:27 PM, seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote: br--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrotr: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 At 3:35 comes a familiar verse. Right I was expecting you and others here to like the Hindu chants in it. I myself heard it this Friday after one friend played it for me remarking I was sure to get high on it and he wasn't disappointed - a good resource for my music fixes :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
On Feb 16, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: And this is my way - http://youtu.be/dKzGJCpeh24 Now, *that's* an ISKCON I could groove to! Totally - but seriously the only thing I loved about ISKCON was their singing and dancing. Once I was totally captivated by the joyful singing of a Caucasian, playing harmonium, with sunglasses on - in Seattle downtown. My first visit to an ISKCON temple near Fayetteville, TN in 1995 - very beautiful setting close to the Jack D distillery. It didn't take long for me to realize as I read Prabhupad's book to realize what a gross perversion it was of Krishna and Hinduism - similar to my mommy Amma's Krishna Bhavas.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Uncle Tantra, can you tell me a bedtime story?
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking insane chances of contracting STDs while doing so, because they're in such a state of denial about what they're doing that they don't even carry condoms with them. The person who benefits most from the particular non- monogamous relationship I live with is 4-year-old Maya. She is fortunate enough to have two loving mothers and one loving father, not to mention a weird Uncle who is not romantically involved with any of them but approves fully of what they are doing -- all to take care of her and teach her things. It's a remarkably *honest* envir- onment, one that I'm pretty sure will enable Maya to grow up to be honest herself. Like the other members of the extended family I live with, I often grow tired of the things that supposedly monoga- mous people project onto nonmonogamous relationships, and the holier-than-thou bullshit they proclaim, all while screwing their secretaries and Pilates instructors on the side and lying about it. Fuck them all. Give me people who have the courage to be honest any day. The French had it right all along: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/01/world/europe/mazarine-pingeot-mitterrand-daughter-looks-back.html?pagewanted=all_r=0 Meanwhile, back in the TMO, you've got such a culture of lying that Maharishi could never admit to getting it on with his female students (and we can be pretty sure that when he did he was in such denial about it that he didn't use condoms) and that King Tony can't admit even to his closest friends that he's legally *married*. No wonder no one has any respect for TMers. They've turned hypocrisy into an artform. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/sexual-revolution-polyamory-may-good-154751829.html On Valentine's Day, images of couples are everywhere. They're buying each other diamond rings, making eyes over expensive restaurant meals and canoodling over chocolate-covered strawberries and champagne. But two-by-two isn't the only way to go through life. In fact, an estimated 4 to 5 percent of Americans are looking outside their relationship for love and sex with their partner's full permission. These consensually nonmonogamous relationships, as they're called, don't conform to the cultural norm of a handholding couple in love for life. They come in a dizzying array
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: The French had it right all along: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/01/world/europe/mazarine-pingeot-mitterrand-daughter-looks-back.html?pagewanted=all_r=0 BTW, I meant that the fact that Mitterand's mistress walked side by side with his wife in his state funeral procession was getting it right, not the secrecy that the family had to put on for the French counter- parts of the monogamaphobes. The secrecy, as it turned out, was entirely unnecessary. Almost no one in France had any problems with Mitterrand having a second family, no more than his wife did. I heard people discussing this all the time when I lived in France, and everyone considered it pretty normal. As for Ms. Pingeot herself, she has happy memories of being with a loving father. It's all the hypocrisy that some in Miterrand's government felt they had to impose on him that caused damage, not the open relationship he had with his wife and mistress.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore? Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking insane chances of contracting STDs while doing so, because they're in such a state of denial about what they're doing that they don't even carry condoms with them. The person who benefits most from the particular non- monogamous relationship I live with is 4-year-old Maya. She is fortunate enough to have two loving mothers and one loving father, not to mention a weird Uncle who is not romantically involved with any of them but approves fully of what they are doing -- all to take care of her and teach her things. It's a remarkably *honest* envir- onment,
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the short paragraph above the following words and statements as the ultimate allure for us readers: idiot, stupid, sexual prudes, spiritual fascists. Gee, don't know about the rest of you but I'm transfixed by this human who could write this way. In fact, I am downright infatuated with love/lust. Barry, you're the man. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking insane chances of contracting STDs while doing so, because they're in such a state of denial about what they're doing that they don't even carry condoms with them. The person who benefits most from the particular non- monogamous relationship I live with is 4-year-old Maya. She is fortunate enough to have two loving mothers and one loving father, not to mention a weird Uncle who is not romantically involved with any of them but approves fully of what they are doing -- all to take care of her and teach her things. It's a remarkably *honest* envir- onment, one that I'm pretty sure will enable Maya to grow up to be honest herself. Methinks Barry has gone off on one big tangent here. Oh Barry, we're over here. Like the other members of the extended family I live with, I often grow tired of the things that supposedly monoga- mous people project onto nonmonogamous relationships, and the holier-than-thou bullshit they proclaim, all while screwing their secretaries and Pilates instructors on the side
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the short paragraph above the following words and statements as the ultimate allure for us readers: idiot, stupid, sexual prudes, spiritual fascists. Gee, don't know about the rest of you but I'm transfixed by this human who could write this way. In fact, I am downright infatuated with love/lust. Barry, you're the man. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking insane chances of contracting STDs while doing so, because they're in such a state of denial about what they're doing that they don't even carry condoms with them. The person who benefits most from the particular non- monogamous relationship I live with is 4-year-old Maya. She is fortunate enough to have two loving mothers and one loving father, not to mention a weird Uncle who is not romantically involved with any of them but approves fully of what they are doing -- all to take care of her and teach her things. It's a remarkably *honest* envir- onment, one that I'm pretty sure will enable Maya to grow up to
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
obbajeeba, I enjoy your strength and dignity - It Rocks! Thank you. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore? Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking insane chances of contracting STDs while doing so, because they're in such a state of denial about what they're doing that they don't even carry condoms with them. The person who benefits most from the particular non- monogamous relationship I live with is 4-year-old Maya. She is fortunate enough to have two loving mothers and
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Thank you too, Dr. Du M. Bass. It takes a village to raise the Turq. His mother didn't do it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: obbajeeba, I enjoy your strength and dignity - It Rocks! Thank you. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore? Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking insane chances of contracting STDs while doing so, because they're in such a state of
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the short paragraph above the following words and statements as the ultimate allure for us readers: idiot, stupid, sexual prudes, spiritual fascists. Gee, don't know about the rest of you but I'm transfixed by this human who could write this way. In fact, I am downright infatuated with love/lust. Barry, you're the man. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking insane chances of contracting STDs while doing so, because they're in such a state of denial about what they're doing that they don't even carry condoms with them. The person who benefits most from the particular non- monogamous relationship I live with is 4-year-old Maya.
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: Thank you too, Dr. Du M. Bass. It takes a village to raise the Turq. His mother didn't do it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: obbajeeba, I enjoy your strength and dignity - It Rocks! Thank you. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore? Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
he's probably lamenting pissing you off - LOL --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the short paragraph above the following words and statements as the ultimate allure for us readers: idiot, stupid, sexual prudes, spiritual fascists. Gee, don't know about the rest of you but I'm transfixed by this human who could write this way. In fact, I am downright infatuated with love/lust. Barry, you're the man. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking insane chances of contracting STDs while doing so, because they're in such a state
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. The thing is, about Barry going around offending people (and calling it tantric opinion - wtf?), is eventually someone will smack him good, like you just did. His ears are probably still ringing! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: he's probably lamenting pissing you off - LOL --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the short paragraph above the following words and statements as the ultimate allure for us readers: idiot, stupid, sexual prudes, spiritual fascists. Gee, don't know about the rest of you but I'm transfixed by this human who could write this way. In fact, I am downright infatuated with love/lust. Barry, you're the man. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK,
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh Oh Obba, are you flirting with me? Watch out 'cuz it just might get me going and then couldn't we just give Barry an eyeful, that is if we'd let him watch, which I highly doubt. Now get going you little sassy-pants, no more of your lip for today - I'd like you to save them both for me tomorrow. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the short paragraph above the following words and statements as the ultimate allure for us readers: idiot, stupid, sexual prudes, spiritual fascists. Gee, don't know about the rest of you but I'm transfixed by this human who could write this way. In fact, I am downright infatuated with love/lust. Barry, you're the man. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Reminded me of yesterday when I called my daughter, who lives in San Francisco, and asked her what she was doing for Valentine's Day, and she said she was going out to dinner with three girlfriends, and then added matter-of-factly that they were going to pretend to be lesbian couples, to get the free champagne. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh Oh Obba, are you flirting with me? Watch out 'cuz it just might get me going and then couldn't we just give Barry an eyeful, that is if we'd let him watch, which I highly doubt. Now get going you little sassy-pants, no more of your lip for today - I'd like you to save them both for me tomorrow. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. Let's see now, how sophisticated is Barry's rebuttal? How do his words here beckon us, entice us to read and take what he says seriously due to their reasonable nature and sense of empathy for the reader? He uses in the short paragraph above the following words and statements as the ultimate allure for us readers: idiot, stupid, sexual prudes, spiritual fascists. Gee, don't know about the rest of you but I'm transfixed by this human
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: Reminded me of yesterday when I called my daughter, who lives in San Francisco, and asked her what she was doing for Valentine's Day, and she said she was going out to dinner with three girlfriends, and then added matter-of-factly that they were going to pretend to be lesbian couples, to get the free champagne. HaHa, clever girl :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
She's like me - not a lot of boundaries, and always willing to save a dollar.:-) Has no interest whatsoever in meditation - that was Dad's job - came in already free.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Reminded me of yesterday when I called my daughter, who lives in San Francisco, and asked her what she was doing for Valentine's Day, and she said she was going out to dinner with three girlfriends, and then added matter-of-factly that they were going to pretend to be lesbian couples, to get the free champagne. HaHa, clever girl :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Thank you too, Dr. Du M. Bass. It takes a village to raise the Turq. His mother didn't do it. Oh poor Barry - I had a tear in my eye. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote: obbajeeba, I enjoy your strength and dignity - It Rocks! Thank you. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore? Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual prudes and the spiritual fascists hate. I've seen the non-lying, open approach to relationships WORK, and work well in nonmonogamous relationships. Alas, I cannot say that for most of the monogamous relationships I've been exposed to. While publicly clinging to the notion of monogamy, all one has to do is look at divorce statistics to see that over 50% of them are more often than not a rats' nest of lies, as one or both partners step out on the other, lying about it the whole time. *And*, as pointed out in the article, taking
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 The thing is, about Barry going around offending people (and calling it tantric opinion - wtf?), is eventually someone will smack him good, like you just did. His ears are probably still ringing! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: he's probably lamenting pissing you off - LOL --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Yes, Ann! He sounds depressed because he watches two women give to one man and they ain't inviting him in! He waits for a rebound bonk, but will not be successful. Poor guy. heh --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: Your comments are hilarious Ann!! Barry is not making much sense here, granted. He seems to focus on the very worst prejudices in others, and take that as the basis for argument. Sounds depressed. Hope you had a great Valentines Day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: Oh yeah, baby, free love if you let me. Lick that extra wet lick lick lick your face and all. Oh, don't forget that rubber! Hey, give me a full physical for everyone who swings and I will be a millionaire! Did you know that venereal disease is pretty common among the aging population? They like to wank the wong to barren wombs of the love canal! No pregnancy and viagra..whoopie! If it ain't good enough, time to wonder what her snatch feels like..and hers and his is bigger and turns to the left a bit more.. Good for you my ass. It means you are fucking bored with your partner. I shall allow this idiocy to stand on its own as an example of why obba has never succeeded in her attempts to flirt with guys on FFL. Who could even *imagine* getting it on with someone that ignorant? Whoa, why the extreme reaction here Barry? Did you know that there are ways to address a difference of opinion with reason, class, openness and diplomacy? Yes indeed, it's true. Instead I'll focus in one of my last posts for the week on the excellent article that Alex found and posted. It's about bloody time that someone did some real studies on polyamorous relationships, to help overcome the idiotic ideas that monogomaphobes have about them. We get the picture, anyone who is a monogomaphobe (which, of course is not even close to being a real word) is an idiot. Oh, and you are about to enlighten all of us on why and how open minded and enlightened you are on the subject. Let's take a look: Living as I do as a non-involved fly on the wall in a polyamorous household, I have a more realistic picture of what is involved in nonmonogamous relationships than most. If there is a single word that characterizes the successful ones I've seen, that word is *honesty*. Oh, you are amazing. And what an original conclusion. Honesty who would have thought? And all this time I thought it was about how good looking the other partner was that kept a relationship intact. It's not about the sex, or as the idiot above suggests, about being bored with one's partner. It's about having the freedom to have more than one partner if one is drawn that way. Claiming that there can be only one is as stupid in romantic relationships as it is for the people who claim that seeing other teachers is suffic- ient grounds to excommunicate someone from a spiritual organization. And even in that parallel, as we all know from the history of the TMO, people are willing to *overlook* straying to other teachers AS LONG AS THOSE WHO DO IT *LIE* ABOUT IT. It's the *openness* and the *non-willingness* to lie about one's actions or apologize for them that the sexual
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Oh poor Barry - I had a tear in my eye. I hope you didn't drown.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:12 PM, navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Oh poor Barry - I had a tear in my eye. I hope you didn't drown. Right - that's why I specified a tear dear new-sorrow-less.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:46 AM, authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: Good ones dear Judy - so this overt display of sadism directed towards Obba let's us fine-tune his hatred towards women. Of course he apparently hates strong, mature, intelligent women but at least the kind of woman that totally drives him into this sadistic rage - so someone funny, witty, loving, stable. Good to know. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675
[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general dis-ease. Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the very worst of his sadistic tendencies. I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January before last: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to brush off the first one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: 1. I might also point out that searching the Web for information to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior. - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) 2. outbursts of sadism? ALL that I said about obba, based on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit crazy and claiming that I'd snipped (which I didn't). I don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this post was in response too, and why you have much free time to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in the field watching the real males hump their way to offspring, something your squirt can only wish for in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, Who's wife can I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect for you oh cherished one. Flirting? Flirting is your imagination, for if this was the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message as you so humbly write and respond to. No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real women. Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I say anymore?
