Re: Broken Spotmatic

2001-02-13 Thread Chris Brogden

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, petit miam wrote:

 Uh, sorry nowhere near. Wrong Hemisphere. I am in
 Gisborne, New Zealand. Probably no-one in Gisborne -

Well, we do have one list member in New Zealand.  Did you want to submit
your name for our geography poll?  If you haven't heard of it yet, read
on


Hi!  Please have a look at this if you haven't seen it yet


From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb  9 11:31:01 2001
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:30:57 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Geography poll (please read!)


In case you missed the first message, here's a recap of what's going on:

I'm asking everyone to e-mail me off-list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
give me their location (country, province/state, and city) so that I can
put together a list of where we all live and post it (or a link to it) to
the group.  This will give us a better idea of how diverse our list is and
will let us know who from the group lives nearby.  Hopefully this will
result in more of us getting together to shoot, attend workshops, etc.  
For this reason, please provide your current address and not your country
of birth if they're different.  If you're going to be moving in a few
weeks, you can use that city instead of your current one.

Please e-mail me off-list for this, so if you hit "reply" to this message
make sure it's going to me, not back to the group.  So far we have 54
people, but that still leaves a lot left to go, so please take a second to
mail me your country, province/state and city.  Thanks!

chris



We're up to over 100 now, so it's coming along nicely, but we don't have
everyone yet.  :)  Thanks!

chris

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Got a new LX

2001-02-13 Thread Paul Jones

Hi,

I got an LX, its mint cosmetic condition except for one tiny rub from the
clips for the strap.

But now i have noticed an interesting thing. The camera wont focus to
infinity, any ideas why this is? everything else seems fine, the mirrors not
even sticky, yet!

Also how do i take the strap clips off?

Thanks
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




which eyepiece diopter for mx?

2001-02-13 Thread Frank Wajer

oops, made a mistake my glasses are -1.75 and -2, so I'm nearsighted.
I asked Pentax NL this same question and they say I need the -1 diopter, so
I guess
the diopter of viewfinder and adapter do add up.
BTW. the diopter lens and adapter come as two seperate products.

anyone know if you can add an eyecup onto the diopter adapter?

Frank

Hi,

I'm getting fed up with focussing with my glasses on so I want to get an
eyepiece
diopter for my MX. Which one do I need. I saw in the manual that the
diopter of
the finder is -0.6, my glasses are 1.75, so I get I need the -1 or the -2
diopter.
So does the diopter on the eyepiece diopter add up to the finder or not?

Frank

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




difference between a winder and a motordrive?

2001-02-13 Thread Frank Wajer

Hi,

anyone know the difference between a winder and a motordrive?

Frank

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Shopping for a new body

2001-02-13 Thread Wieland Willker

Mark Roberts wrote:
 If I were shopping for a new camera right now (and I may be
 later this year) I'd be considering the MZ-S and the PZ-1p.
 Although there are many differences between the two, the ones
 that would affect my decision would be the better viewfinder
 (from what we've heard so far), faster standard flash sync and
 faster winder speed on the PZ-1p versus the better autofocus and
 the electronic depth-of-field preview of the MZ-S.
 It'd be a *really* close call. Probably determined by price.

Isn't this interesting? That Pentax comes up with a new "flagship" after 7 years, 
which is
NOT significantly better than the old one?
I am thinking about a new body for my MF lenses. So, I am not interested in the better
AF-system. What's left?
"electronic depth-of-field preview" - not needed, manual is ok.
"Illuminated lens mount index" - not needed, gimmick
"data imprinting between frames" - this is interesting, but is it worth that much more
money? Price is on the side of the Z-1p.

Best wishes
Wieland


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Eyepoint

2001-02-13 Thread Wieland Willker

I am wearing glasses, and I have ABSOLUTELY NO problem with the MX viewfinder. I can 
see
the apperture very easily. And everything else. Either you folks have a different MX, 
or
never had an MX or you have very different glasses.  :-)

Best wishes
Wieland


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Re[2]: Report from PMA

2001-02-13 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov

Recently Bob Walkden wrote:
 
 An all-rounder is a
 camera like the LX which could be used for the full range of 35mm
 activities at the time. From scientific, macro and copy work, through the
 point-and-shoot functionality of the day, to heavy-duty photojournalism.
 
 A camera which can't do all of these things is not an all-rounder.

Hi Bob,

You are definitely wrong.  :-)  An all arounder is one that is not
well-enough suited to any particular job.  At least, that seems to be the
new-world definiton...

Cheers,
Boz

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Got a new LX

2001-02-13 Thread Gerald Cermak


Paul Jones writes:

 I got an LX, its mint cosmetic condition except for one tiny rub from the
 clips for the strap.

 But now i have noticed an interesting thing. The camera wont focus to
 infinity, any ideas why this is?

A $150 CLA and upgrades from Pentax USA should make the focus
"right as rain".  My used LX had the same problem, and a slight sticky
mirror problem on shutter release.  All of that, and a new ISO resistor
(they wear out and get dirty), and a replaced self timer/dof preview button.
It was quite the good deal, and my LX works perfectly like new now.  The
focus problem is due to where the mirror lands after each shot, and related
to wear in the foam rubber bumpers inside.

 everything else seems fine, the mirrors not
 even sticky, yet!

Sounds like it is in better shape than mine was!  Enjoy!

Cheers,
Gerald




-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The AF assist beam / body for MF only

2001-02-13 Thread Wieland Willker

Joseph McAllister wrote:
 On my PZ-1p, the IR (red) projector is a small round (clear looking) lens
 built in to the flash's lens. It projects a series of 3 to 5 vertical
 bars that give the AF something with vertical edges.

Thanks for this information!
How good is this working?
How far is the beam reaching?
Is it useful for manual focussing? A split image screen would be ideal! Is that 
avalable?
I have heard it is not.
Does it need much battery?

Best wishes
Wieland


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: MZ-S: AF sensors?

2001-02-13 Thread Alin Flaider

David wrote:

DAM Apologies if I've missed this, but do we know what kind of AF sensors the 
DAM MZ-S has?  Are we still limited to focussing on vertical lines or will we get 
DAM cross-sensors now?

  The orientation and layout of AF sensors is as follows:
  +-+
  |-|
  |  ||-||  |
  | |
  +-+

  Servus, Alin


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




MZ-S noise...

2001-02-13 Thread Antti-Pekka Virjonen

Hi!

I believe that none of you have actually yet taken
any photos with the new camera (MZ-S)... but many
have already started to complain about missing features
and missing bells and whistles.

It's a fact that ALL and every camera (and other technical
gadgets) always miss some features and the design is a
compromise.

C'mon... Pentax developed a nice small metal body with nice
new features and improvements (like new multi point AF and
imprinting etc.). Compare it to the big ugly monsters from the others:
it's true some of them have features that sound like pulled
out from a science fiction movie and they are bulky.. but
honestly.. do they take that much better pictures ??

I find the new MZ-S very nice according to the facts published
up to now. Also, a matching new digital body... 

I'd say this is not bad, not bad at all!

Spring time is coming close, get your cameras and go shoot
some film! It will relax your nerves :-)

Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D   * GSM: +358 400 789753 *
* Computec Oy Turku* FIN-20750 Turku Finland * Fax: +358 2 413  *

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: what's the difference between a wnider and a motordrive?

2001-02-13 Thread mike wilson

Answer A:  About 100+ (Tad!  Who needs surreal comedy when
there are crackers like this left lying around for anyone to
use?)

Answer B:  The winder does just that.  About the same speed as
using your thumb, but quicker because you don't need to move the
camera from your eye.  Usually an option for single frame or
continuous drive.  Self contained.  May have other functions.

Motordrive is usually faster, has more options (such as variable
speed, interval shooting, etc.) and often has a separate power
source(s).

Both may have a remote release of some type.

mike
(PDML BALPA spokesman)

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Digital pair of MZ-S @ PMA

2001-02-13 Thread Alin Flaider

Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 12:47:21 PM

  Of course I meant PMA. Photokina is now dust and buried...

I wrote:

AF Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 12:23:18 PM

AF   Some of the CdI gleans at Photokina for those that don't read
AF   French. Original text and details pictures at
AF   http://www.photim.net/PMA/PMA-Live-4.htm.

AF   CdI guys effectively had it in their hands and gave it a full run.
AF   Contrary to their previous acid criticism at Photokina, this time
AF   comments are almost eulogistic.
AF - very reactive autofocus
AF - ergonomics are particularly original and successful.
AF - for a camera that ambitious due to its 6 MPixel CCD, it's
AF remarkably compact
AF - excellent integration of electronic layout: commands are
AF performed via a small wheel on the left of the LCD screen, that
AF selects by rotation and confirms by pressure.
AF - PCMCIA and CompactFlash slots in the bottom grip, possibly
AF allowing modem communications or GPS connection.
AF - FireWire connector
AF - the sample they tested is already operational - they could take
AF and preview pictures but digital signal processing is still under
AF development
AF - again the $7000 rumour is pushed, as well as the summer
AF availability.

AF   Interestingly, it appears that Pentax is more advanced than Contax
AF   despite the technological similitudes. Apparently Contax D sample is
AF   still in the dummy state.

AF   Servus, Alin


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: MZ-S

2001-02-13 Thread Ralf Engelmann

I want to lead the attention of the audience to the clear cut 
statement of the press release, that the MZ-S offers "magnesium 
covers at the four most important places". This fits perfect to the 
comments and pictures published so far.

The four places likely are:

1 retractable flash cover
2 bottom cover
3 top cover
4 front (or less likely back)

This leaves the sides, grip and back (less likely front), plus the 
interior for polycarbonate (the mirror housing and film guides are 
metal reinforced again). Hence there is no heavy duty full metal 
body, but the class typical material mix very similar to Elan 7.

The price of the camera should indeed be in the $800 range, anything 
else would be laughable.

Ralf
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Eyepoint

2001-02-13 Thread Alexander Krohe

Weiland wrote: ---
"I am wearing glasses, and I have ABSOLUTELY NO
problem with the MX viewfinder. I can see the aperture
very easily. And everything else. Either you folks
have a different MX, or never had an MX or you have
very different glasses.  :-)

Best wishes
Wieland
---

Hi Wieland,
I don't know which posting you are referring to, but
or my part: I didn't wrote about eyepoint I wrote
about the "viewing distance" to the screen. That meant
the distance, the eye has to adjust when looking at
the screen. If this is too short, the eyes will get
tiered soon when continually looking to the
viewfinder. (In contrast is "the eyepoint, or eye
relief, indicates how far your eye can be from the
viewfinder to see the entire image" -- see posting
from Erwin Vereecken)

Speaking about the MX, this distance is definitely too
short. The viewing distance of the aperture indication
is way too short.  

People on this list tend to be very uncritical about
cameras or lenses that they are in love with, - in
particular when it comes to those vintage gear :) ...
I like the MX too but it has definitely shortcomings
(no wonder it's 25 years old design). One of them this
the viewfinder.
Alexander




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread Pål Jensen

Wieland wrote:


 Pl, what is up?
 First you've said again and again, that the MZ-S IS NOT the flagship and we can await
 something really cool later and now you say it IS the flagship and it IS cool, 

The MZ-S is not THE flagship meaning there will be a camera above it. The MZ-S is 
indeed the current flagship and the flagship of the MZ-line.


when it is
 obvious that is not much better than the Z-1p (if at all)?


Its obvious to me that the MZ-S is in a completely different league than the Z-1p. 
With these max fps and top shutterspeed arguments it can be argued that the Z-1p is in 
the same class as the EOS-1v; after all the only difference between them is a few 
extra focus point and some fps for the EOS-1v. It doesn't work that way.
On a pure feature count basis the MZ-S surpasses the Z-1p. The max shutter speed is 
only 1/4 stop lower; totally insignificant. The difference in flash synch speed is 1/2 
stop. However, the MZ-S can indeed synch at 1/250s and the loss in guide number at 
this speed is probably hardly measureable. The only thing going for the the Z-1p is 
slightly higher fps.
If Pentax' claim of LX durability is to be believed, then the MZ-S is a pure pro 
camera specified for more than 100 000 shutter cycles putting it firmly in F5 and 
EOS-1 territory. In comparison the Z-1p is shutter cycle is somewhere between 25 
000-50 000. We are talking about a totally different league of camera if Pentax isn't 
bullshitting us. I doubt however that Pentax would have claimed LX durability if it 
wasn't true. 


Pl



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Got a new LX

2001-02-13 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

The focus problem is caused by the same worn out mirror bumpers as the
sticky mirror problem. Like most used LX cameras, it will require a
sticky mirror fix. Are you in the Us? Pentax USA does it for around $170
along with an overall CLA. (And they seem to have gotten better at it in
recent months.) I believe the Pentax repair facilities in other parts of
the world provide a similar service.
Paul 

Paul Jones wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I got an LX, its mint cosmetic condition except for one tiny rub from the
 clips for the strap.
 
 But now i have noticed an interesting thing. The camera wont focus to
 infinity, any ideas why this is? everything else seems fine, the mirrors not
 even sticky, yet!
 
 Also how do i take the strap clips off?
 
 Thanks
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: New to the group

2001-02-13 Thread Aaron Reynolds



Len Paris wrote:

 You can't screw the MZ-S because it's a K-mount camera.  You'll
 have to bayonet it, instead. :-)

Lucky for me, I have a K-to-screw adaptor.

-Aaron

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




OT: Manual Gear; was Re: News from PMA...

2001-02-13 Thread Flavio Minelli

Alan Chan wrote:
 
 ... Car manufacturers still make
 5 speed manual, don't they (would you be one of these drivers)?
 
 ...

Just a little folklore:

Here in Italy there are probably about 0.5% automatic gear cars.

If you drive one you either are disabled or a sissy. Or both.

Everybody here wants to be a formula 1 pilot.

We have about 1 cell phone every other person, though...


Flavio (who's getting an automatic one, though)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Got a new LX

2001-02-13 Thread Paul Jones

Hi,

I think i can see the problem inside...

I;m actualy in Australia and the pentax distributar is a company called CR
Kennedy. I'm not sure what there like or how much there going to charge
me I remember a few weeks some one on the list from Australia had sent
there LX to CR Kennedy for a CLA, wouldnt mind know how they went and how
much it cost.

Any one got any reccomendations for a repair shop in Mellbourne?

Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "PAUL STENQUIST" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: Got a new LX


 The focus problem is caused by the same worn out mirror bumpers as the
 sticky mirror problem. Like most used LX cameras, it will require a
 sticky mirror fix. Are you in the Us? Pentax USA does it for around $170
 along with an overall CLA. (And they seem to have gotten better at it in
 recent months.) I believe the Pentax repair facilities in other parts of
 the world provide a similar service.
 Paul

 Paul Jones wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I got an LX, its mint cosmetic condition except for one tiny rub from
the
  clips for the strap.
 
  But now i have noticed an interesting thing. The camera wont focus to
  infinity, any ideas why this is? everything else seems fine, the mirrors
not
  even sticky, yet!
 
  Also how do i take the strap clips off?
 
  Thanks
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Pål Jensen

Here in Norway the MZ-S will cost appoximately $1700. Ho-ho. They hope for mid March. 
I'll get one.
It has LX built quality and sealing. This is a pro camera.


Pl

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: what's the difference between a wnider and a motordrive?

2001-02-13 Thread SudaMafud

In a message dated 2/13/01 6:13:29 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 has more options (such as variable speed, interval shooting, etc.)  


And vertical release for the Motor "A"

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Paul Jones


$1700us ? Ouch!


From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:02:50 +0100

Here in Norway the MZ-S will cost appoximately $1700. Ho-ho. They hope for 
mid March. I'll get one.
It has LX built quality and sealing. This is a pro camera.


Pål

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .


_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Money-saving darkroom

2001-02-13 Thread Mike Johnston

Colin wrote:

 I've been trying to do it cheap, so ...
 
 A paper deal:Midwest Photo has RCIII/E 100cnt boxes 4x5 for $9
 
 Safelight deal:  Home Depot (home repair shop) has 7 1/2 watt red lights
 for $1.35 each.
 (beats $10 in the camera shops!)
 
 Any else have other ideas/sources ?


Sure. For trays and measuring beakers, use pyrex baking trays and measuring
cups from the supermarket. They're inert, clean well, last a long time if
you maintain them, and they're cheap.

For a timer, use a metronome. Sold at all music stores. Set it for sixty
beats a minute and count seconds.

For an enlarging lens, look for one called an "Omicron-El." They were made
for Omega by Nikon in the '70s and '80s and they're very good quality
enlarging lenses that never sell for anywhere near what El-Nikkors do.

For drying racks, use pre-made plastic window screens from the hardware
store. If you want to get fancy you can build a rack for them, but you can
also simply stack them on top of each other. They work fine. If you print
RC, just hang them by the corner using wooden clothespins to dry.

For a squeegee to use for squeegeeing fiber prints, use a rubber window
squeegee from the hardware store or a windshield wiper blade from an auto
parts store.

For a sink, use a tabletop or countertop. Just wipe it down after you're
finished. Print processing temperature isn't critical and works fine at
ambient room temperatures.

If you want to get cheap about chemicals it requires some calculation. You
can buy the raw chemicals and make perfectly good solutions mixing your own,
but you need to work out amounts in advance so that you don't overbuy
anything. Also, you need to use them all up in order to realize the
savings--if you buy ten pounds of sodium sulfite and then give up
photography before you've used three pounds, you will have lost money, not
saved it. However, "measuring spoon" conversions are easy to work out, so
that you can mix up the chemicals you need in a jiffy without a scale.

There's one more really good moneysaving tip, but I just can't remember it
right now. Middle-aged moment? s

--Mike

 

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread Mike Johnston

Frantisek wrote:

 (why Leica made such ugly and big slr when their rf cameras are so cute
 and small is out of my imagination... R8 also looks like it's been made by
 a designer on a bad trip, imho. I much prefer the early German hardware
 (like Contax S, Contaxes, Leicas #,M3,...) to those strange ugly R8 slrs.


Frantisek,
I totally agree, which is one reason I got chased off the Leica User Group.
If you think it's bad saying anything bad about Pentax here, trying saying
something negative about Leica over there. They set upon you like a pack of
dogs. g

When the original designer of the Leica, Oskar Barnack, considered adding a
rangefinder to his original design, he was adamant that it not increase the
size of the camera unecessarily. Leica lost sight of that principle with the
R8. Although, really, the whole point of Leica R is that wonderful lens
line. 

--Mike

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Evan Hanson

Is that USD or Krone??

Evan

Pl Jensen wrote:
 
 Here in Norway the MZ-S will cost appoximately $1700. Ho-ho. They hope for mid 
March. I'll get one.
 It has LX built quality and sealing. This is a pro camera.
 
 Pl
 
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread SudaMafud

In a message dated 2/13/01 2:38:22 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  ...The grip of  Z-1p is not bad either, just that my last finger did not 
have a good grip since the body is a bit short.  


My thoughts precisely. Perhaps the MZ-S with booster should do a fine job of 
filling up the hand.

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Shopping for a new body

2001-02-13 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov

Recently Wieland Willker wrote:
 
 Isn't this interesting? That Pentax comes up with a new "flagship" after
 7 years, which is NOT significantly better than the old one?
 I am thinking about a new body for my MF lenses. So, I am not interested
 in the better AF-system.

In other words: "The new camera has a better AF system, but I am not
interested in AF.  So the new camera is NOT better than the old one."

That's not logic that I can agree with.

My thoughts on the MZ-S are that FOR ME it is not worth upgrading.  The
only significant advantage FOR ME is the data imprinting and pseudo MLU.
If Paal is right with his $1700 price for the MZ-S, I am not willing to
spend that much money for these features.  I am disappointed that the MZ-S
will not do flash compensation with my AF500FTZ flash, and will probably
not work with my current remote cord F.

At this point I have a 5n for casual AF shooting and an LX for serious MF
work.  If I din't have the 5n, however, I would be hot on the MZ-S.

Cheers,
Boz

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Manual Gear; was Re: News from PMA...

2001-02-13 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov

Recently Flavio Minelli wrote about Italy:

 Everybody here wants to be a formula 1 pilot.

Not only do they want to, they practice hard on the way to work too...
After my trip to Italy I had a real problem fitting back into the German
road-behavior requirements  :-)

 We have about 1 cell phone every other person, though...

Yep, the proprtion of stick-shifts in Europe is definitely not related to
the income or the "forward-thinking"...
 
 Here in Italy there are probably about 0.5% automatic gear cars.
 If you drive one you either are disabled or a sissy. Or both.
 Flavio (who's getting an automatic one, though)

Oh-oh-oh...  I am not even going to ask the obvious question...  3:-)

Cheers,
Boz

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Ed Mathews

So approximately what would you expect that to equate to in U.S. dollars?
And are you talking list price or sell price?

Thanks,
Ed
- Original Message -
From: "Pl Jensen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 7:02 AM
Subject: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!


 Here in Norway the MZ-S will cost appoximately $1700. Ho-ho. They hope for
mid March. I'll get one.
 It has LX built quality and sealing. This is a pro camera.


 Pl

 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Someone got a good deal

2001-02-13 Thread Collin Brendemuehl

There's been a couple of those lately.
Last week a K-1000 w/ 50/2 went for $69.
I cried. ;(

Collin

At 12:35 AM 2/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1214454113

K1000, M50/2, and K100/4 Macro all for $100.

Wish I were him/her.

Gerald


***

"The accumulation of all powers legislative,
executive and judiciary in the same hands . . .
may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."

--James Madison, Federalist 47

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Pål Jensen

I wrote:

 Here in Norway the MZ-S will cost appoximately $1700. Ho-ho. They hope for mid 
March. I'll get one.
 It has LX built quality and sealing. This is a pro camera.


Of course it should be mid March delivery. 
This price turns into about 1000 (the same as earlier estimates) and in the US a 
price around $1200+. Expect US mailorder price to be around $900 - 1000.
In Norway it cost 14000Nkr which todays valuta rates turns into 1065 or ~1600 USD 
(not 1700 as I posted previously - the dollar was higher than I anticipated)


Pl

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Eyepoint

2001-02-13 Thread Wieland Willker

Alexander Krohe wrote:
 Speaking about the MX, this distance is definitely too
 short. The viewing distance of the aperture indication
 is way too short.

What is too short? I don't understand this. Should it be farther away? Why? I can see 
and
read it perfectly.

 People on this list tend to be very uncritical about
 cameras or lenses that they are in love with,

I am not in love with the MX. I use several as workhorses. They are good. I am not
uncritical. But maybe I just haven't seen enough different viewfinders to understand 
what
you mean. I have seen the MZ series and they are worse. I can only say that I wear 
glasses
and I have absolutely no problem with the MX viewfinder, so I was quite surprised to  
read
this.

Best wishes
Wieland


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Manual Gear; was Re: News from PMA...

2001-02-13 Thread Ed Mathews

If I can't drive for McLaren or Ferrari, I won't drive at all.

Thanks,
Ed
- Original Message - 
From: "Bojidar Dimitrov" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Manual Gear; was Re: News from PMA...


 Recently Flavio Minelli wrote about Italy:
 
  Everybody here wants to be a formula 1 pilot.
 
 Not only do they want to, they practice hard on the way to work too...
 After my trip to Italy I had a real problem fitting back into the German
 road-behavior requirements  :-)
 
  We have about 1 cell phone every other person, though...
 
 Yep, the proprtion of stick-shifts in Europe is definitely not related to
 the income or the "forward-thinking"...
  
  Here in Italy there are probably about 0.5% automatic gear cars.
  If you drive one you either are disabled or a sissy. Or both.
  Flavio (who's getting an automatic one, though)
 
 Oh-oh-oh...  I am not even going to ask the obvious question...  3:-)
 
 Cheers,
 Boz
 
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 
 
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread Pål Jensen

Dave

 So, a Pentax market survey involves asking just Pl what he wants in
 the next camera?  :)  Did they ask anyone else?


Sure. MZ-size, nifty features from the Z-1p, and LX built was pretty much the message 
from the Pentax user base. Pentax have been listening more to their customers than 
even I have given them credit for.

Pl


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Pål Jensen

Mafud wrote:

  Expect US mailorder price to be around $900 - 1000 
 
 Oh-oh. That's EOS 1n (sans booster) terriitory. 


Do make some rooms for errors here; this is a guesstimate based on the Norwegian price 
approximately converted into US conditions based on my experience in Norwegian vs. US 
prices.

Pl 


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread Rob Studdert

On 13 Feb 2001, at 7:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 My thoughts precisely. Perhaps the MZ-S with booster should do a fine job of 
 filling up the hand.

And emptying the pocket, so it appears :-(

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Durability: was: Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread aimcompute

Good point Mafud!  The truth of the matter is, we have an idea of how
durable the PZ-1p is.  The new camera is as yet unproven.

I see a distinct tendency by some to simply equate newer with better.

The new MZ-S is just the next PZ-1p.  I think taking any features away or
downgrading specs from the PZ-1p was a mistake.  I also agree with Wieland.
At the MZ-S price point, where's the big advantage?  To tell you the truth
I've always been happy with the PZ-1p AF (except with my 80-320).

Tom C.

Maufud wrote:


Speaking of the durability of the PZ-1p:
how many on the list have worn out a PZ-1p; or know of someone wearing out
a
PZ-1p; and after how many tens of thousands of frames?

What's *your* frame/roll count on *your* PZ-1p?




-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Print Film Choices

2001-02-13 Thread Raivo Tiikmaa


Hello , Eric !

Try  FUJI Superia   films  with  4-th layer.  For You  best is FUJI Superia 400 , but 
for racing  best choice is Superia 800.

Good luck with Your  pictures , Raivo

http://home.delfi.ee/tiikmaa

---
Ühe e-maili aadressi asemel 5! Uuri järgi - http://www.hot.ee



Re: Print Film Choices

2001-02-13 Thread Nicholas Wright


--- Erik Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hey Everyone,
 I am looking to try out some better print films and
 need some advise. I tend
 to shoot a lot of outdoor landscape/wildlife scenes
 and sports. I am not
 looking for a single film to fill all jobs just some
 suggestions on what to
 try out. I prefer to shoot in color but would love
 to try out a nice fast
 BW film especially for the sports shots.
 
 TIA,
 Erik
 
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. 
 To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
 Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
 http://pug.komkon.org .
 

For high-speed color film I use Fuji NPS (400) and/or
NPH (800). I onced pushed NPH to 3200 to shoot an
indoor hockey practice available and the results were
excellent! Can post pix from that later if any would
like to see them. For black and white I use Ilford's
HP5 Plus which I push to 3200 *very* regularly and
*love* the results. I develop in Kodak TMax Pro.
Almost all the high school football that I shot last
season was shot with this film and rating.

Nick

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Report from PMA

2001-02-13 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Bob Walkden wrote:
 
 Erwin Vereecken wrote:
 
 [...]
 
  I agree, I think we are looking at a nice robust all-rounder

And then Bob said:
 
 a camera which does not address the concerns of a fairly large part of
 the market cannot be considered an all-rounder. An all-rounder is a
 camera like the LX which could be used for the full range of 35mm
 activities at the time. From scientific, macro and copy work, through the
 point-and-shoot functionality of the day, to heavy-duty photojournalism.
 
 A camera which can't do all of these things is not an all-rounder.

I agree with your definition of an "all-rounder" but I also feel
that the MZ-S ~does~ address the concerns and needs of a large
part of the market, which is the general consumer, who is not
particularly interested in macro photography, photo journalism,
astro photography, or scientific photography.  They want some
whiz-bang features that make shooting painless, and which they
can use for family photos and travel pictures. None  of my
non-photographer friends have ever done anything other than
point  and shoot with their gear.  Never have they even adjusted
exposure to compensate for back lighting of the subject, used 
more than the standard fixed or a simple zoom lens, and rarely,
if ever, used a tripod.  In fact, none of them even have a
tripod.

Photography is no longer just for photographers. 

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's about time we started to take 
photography seriously and treat it 
as a hobby.  -- Elliott Erwitt
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




New flash! Say it isn't so!

2001-02-13 Thread Nicholas Wright

Looking at the pix of the new flash I am shocked to
see that it looks very much like that it cannot
swivel! Please someone tell me this is not so! It
appears as though the control/LCD panel extend up and
behind the flash head, which would make swivelling
immpossible, no?

Nick

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: P-TTL?

2001-02-13 Thread Nicholas Wright

P-TTL, if I'm not mistaken, would be 'pre'-TTL in
which a brief pre flash is emmited to allow the camera
to better judge the proper exposure of a flash
picture. Similiar to systems that Big C  N already
have. This feature would be great for portraiture but
useless for anything photojournalistic where *the
moment* is all that matters.

Nick

--- Matti Etelapera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I just read an old Photokina report by Ralf
 Engelmann

(http://www.mtu-net.ru/penta/archive/4/exhibition/photokina_eng.htm)
 and
 made some observations on the new flash. I haven't
 heard of a P-TTL flash
 before. Maybe this is a 6-segment TTL flash metering
 mode? Does anyone 
 have good suggestions what the little (M/C/S)
 -switch near the bottom 
 of the flash does?
 
   -Matti Eteläperä
 
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. 
 To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
 Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
 http://pug.komkon.org .
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread aimcompute

OK Pal - Just WHEN did Pentax ask YOU and WHEN did they inform YOU of a
customer survey?  I can't help but find most of your statements either
hubris or conjecture if they're not backed up by credible evidence (dates,
time, names).

Tom C.

-Original Message-
From: Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff


Dave

 So, a Pentax market survey involves asking just Pl what he wants in
 the next camera?  :)  Did they ask anyone else?


Sure. MZ-size, nifty features from the Z-1p, and LX built was pretty much
the message from the Pentax user base. Pentax have been listening more to
their customers than even I have given them credit for.

Pl


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Camera Durability

2001-02-13 Thread Bill D. Casselberry

 
 Mafud wrote:

 Speaking of the durability of the PZ-1p: how many on the list 
 have worn out a PZ-1p; or know of someone wearing out a
 PZ-1p; and after how many tens of thousands of frames?

Geeez!  I haven't even been able to wear out my old H2, even
though *somebody* has been using it since 1959! Then there's
the H1's and the SP F  the SuperProgram, ProgramPlus  MESuper.

(a Spotmatic  a Spotmatic II are both out of commission though
 due to some mechanical mirror-flip linkage hangup. Hmmm - anyone
 need some "parts/fixable?" screwmount Pentaxes ??  off-list w/
 offer if interested)

!8^D
 
-
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast

http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: PENTAX MX RELIABILITY SURVEY

2001-02-13 Thread D. Glenn Arthur Jr.

jeepgirl wrote:
 I suspect that the vast majority of readers of this group put
 less than 50 rolls a year through all their bodies combined!

[Was that part quoting someone else?]

 i think this would be interesting to know,  coming from a girl who shot 42
 rolls of film in two weeks

2000:  150 rolls
1999:  149 rolls
1998:  118 rolls
1997:  94 rolls (didn't start shooting until late Spring)

42 rolls in two weeks sounds right -- at Pennsic I shoot about 20 rolls
(+/-5) in just under a week.  Some non-shooting weeks the rest of the
year bring the average back down again.

Sixteen and a half rolls so far in 2001.

-- Glenn

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Durability: was: Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread Nicholas Wright


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What's *your* frame/roll count on *your* PZ-1p?


Hmmm... let's see... I'm up to close to 1,000 rolls
without a single hiccup. Well, except that the bottom
plate cracked, but that's not hindering my shooting.
It's just a little bitty crack, not even 1/8 inch long
but annoying especially since I have not dropped this
camera (knock on wood). :)

Nick

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




lenses

2001-02-13 Thread Donna Lynn Crain
Title: Clear Day




What's the difference between SMC and TAKUMAR lenses?
Which gives best quality? 
Thanks


Re: Pentax LZ-A?

2001-02-13 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Bob Walkden wrote:

 Possibly. In these little aeroplanes 
 it is in fact very easy to get
 through to the cabin. When I was 
 flying over Lake Tana I was rather
 disconcerted when the cabin door rolled 
 upon and revealed the pilot
 peering at a fully-open map held 
 against the windscreen. :o)

I had to laugh at that.  Reminds me of a flight I had in Peru -
small plane with a capacity of  10 or 12 passengers.  No cabin
door, just a curtain, which was left open most of the time. 
Poor guy in front of me had to use the bathroom and was very
upset to find out there was  none vbg.  The co-pilot suggested
he use the barf bag, which upset him even more. 

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Shopping for a new body

2001-02-13 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Hi Doug ...

You said:

 If I wanted a manual focus camera, 
 I would choose neither the PZ-1p nor 
 the MZ-S, because there are far 
 better manual focus cameras out there 
 at much cheaper prices.

What cameras can you buy new that are manual focus and which are
cheaper than what one can buy a PZ-1p for - besides the MZ-M? 

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Durability: was: Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread tom

John Francis wrote:
 
 I wrote:
 
  My older one used to belong to a NASCAR photographer and is beat to
  *hell*. The LCD is cracked, the AF motor is slower than on my new body,
  but it keeps humming along
 
 Did you get it from Charlotte Camera?
 That was the back story on the big lens I bought from them. Nowadays
 it has moved on to better things - CART, ALMS, Vintage, ... :-)

Yep, also got his 85/1.4 and 28-70/2.8...all a little scarred, but
functioning perfectly. They're not leading such a glamorous life,
however...weddings, portraits, cats, landscapes when I get a chance.

tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

The price of any product isn't necessarily determined in regard to the
price of other products. There are a number of other factors that must
be considered. Most important are these three: How many people will buy
the camera if we price it at $. Will we sell all we can produce at
that price? Will we make enough money to recover our investment and
begin making a profit in a reasonable amount of time? 
I'm sure Pentax doesn't expect all of us to run out and buy the
MZ-S. If we were to do that, it would be certain evidence that it was
underpriced. And if we expand that purchase rate to the entire universe
of Pentax users and enthusiasts, production couldn't possibly keep up.
So rejection by a certain number of potential buyers is obviously going
to happen. It's a good thing.

Pl Jensen wrote:
 
 Wieland wrote:
 
  This is not obvious to me.
  Ok, what is so much better with the MZ-S that is is almost trice the price of the 
Z-1p?
  (if your $1700 is correct).
  durability - ok. AF is better but one should expect this for a newer camera after 
7 years
  at no cost.
 
 Maybe the same logic that make the F100 cost way more than the Z-1p?
 Remember also that Pentax has been litterally dumping the Z-1p the last years. When 
released the Z-1p costed the same as the Nikon F90. Late in life of the F90 it sold 
for $900 while the Z-1p was reduced to $500 (B+H). So a new Z-1p would costed 
significantly more than the current one.
 
 I have no problem with the price of the MZ-S and I doubt anyone else would have had 
if it was a Nikon. Imagine the MZ-S made by Nikon as the F100 Compact. Sold for the 
same price as the F100. Marketed at those who want F100 qualities but in a smaller 
body. Nikon would have said that compensate for the slower motor, they had added 
mirror prefire (made the Nikon users wild), data imprinting, an extra AF point, mid 
roll rewind with memory. I can see all the whining on Pentax discuss wanting this 
Nikon compact to be a Pentax- Luckily it is.
 
 Pl
 
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Durability: was: Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread John Francis

tom wrote:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Not sure. Is there a way to tell?
 
 My older one used to belong to a NASCAR photographer and is beat to
 *hell*. The LCD is cracked, the AF motor is slower than on my new body,
 but it keeps humming along

Did you get it from Charlotte Camera?
That was the back story on the big lens I bought from them. Nowadays
it has moved on to better things - CART, ALMS, Vintage, ... :-)

-- 
John Francis  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-82952011 N. Shoreline Blvd. MS 43U-991
(650)932-0828 (Fax)  Mountain View, CA   94043-1389
Hello.   My name is Darth Vader.   I am your father.   Prepare to die.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: New MZ-S Features?

2001-02-13 Thread tom

dick graham wrote:

 
 There are 2 features that I still don't know if this camera has, flash
 compensation and mid roll rewind with leader left out.  

Looks like you'll have to do flash comp like on the 5n.

OTOH, not only does it leave the leader out, when you reload it it knows
how far to advance the film.

Pretty cool.

tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread John Francis

Pl Jensen wrote:
 
 When released the Z-1p costed the same as the Nikon F90.

That might have been true in your part of the world, but it was
most definitely not true in the USA.   I bought a PZ-1p as soon
as they hit the mail-order stores, and I paid $650.
I think an N90 *still* costs more than that - in any case, the
N90 of the time cost a lot more than $650 (I believe around $900).

-- 
John Francis  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-82952011 N. Shoreline Blvd. MS 43U-991
(650)932-0828 (Fax)  Mountain View, CA   94043-1389
Hello.   My name is Darth Vader.   I am your father.   Prepare to die.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread Chris Brogden

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:

 On a pure feature count basis the MZ-S surpasses the Z-1p. The max
 shutter speed is only 1/4 stop lower; totally insignificant.

The difference between 1/6000 and 1/8000 is half a stop, right?  1/4000 to
1/8000 is a full stop, so I assumed that 1/6000 will be halfway between
them.  :)  Aside from nitpicking, I agree with Paal's point that the MZ-S
has more (though different) features than the Z1-p.  Of course, the MZ-7
has more (and different) features than the MZ-5n, though that doesn't make
it a better camer for some people.

chris

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread Rfsindg

Paul wrote:
All manufacturers of expensive consumer goods conduct product clinics before they 
commit to production. They bring a bunch of people into a secure room and show them 
both the new product and competitive merchandise. Then they quiz them in regard to 
the inclusion or exclusion of particular features, styling, price points, etc. It's 
established business practice. I'm sure Pentax does it.

Paul,

I agree, but I'll bet everyone in the room spoke Japanese!

Regards,  Bob S.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread Otis Wright, Jr.

Having had the opportunity to review a reasonable number of product programs, I have 
observed that products that have their pricing/specs set without regard to competition 
are seldom successful in meeting their other objectives.

PAUL STENQUIST wrote:

 The price of any product isn't necessarily determined in regard to the
 price of other products. There are a number of other factors that must
 be considered. Most important are these three: How many people will buy
 the camera if we price it at $. Will we sell all we can produce at
 that price? Will we make enough money to recover our investment and
 begin making a profit in a reasonable amount of time?
 I'm sure Pentax doesn't expect all of us to run out and buy the
 MZ-S. If we were to do that, it would be certain evidence that it was
 underpriced. And if we expand that purchase rate to the entire universe
 of Pentax users and enthusiasts, production couldn't possibly keep up.
 So rejection by a certain number of potential buyers is obviously going
 to happen. It's a good thing.

 Pl Jensen wrote:
 
  Wieland wrote:
 
   This is not obvious to me.
   Ok, what is so much better with the MZ-S that is is almost trice the price of 
the Z-1p?
   (if your $1700 is correct).
   durability - ok. AF is better but one should expect this for a newer camera 
after 7 years
   at no cost.
 
  Maybe the same logic that make the F100 cost way more than the Z-1p?
  Remember also that Pentax has been litterally dumping the Z-1p the last years. 
When released the Z-1p costed the same as the Nikon F90. Late in life of the F90 it 
sold for $900 while the Z-1p was reduced to $500 (B+H). So a new Z-1p would costed 
significantly more than the current one.
 
  I have no problem with the price of the MZ-S and I doubt anyone else would have 
had if it was a Nikon. Imagine the MZ-S made by Nikon as the F100 Compact. Sold for 
the same price as the F100. Marketed at those who want F100 qualities but in a 
smaller body. Nikon would have said that compensate for the slower motor, they had 
added mirror prefire (made the Nikon users wild), data imprinting, an extra AF point, 
mid roll rewind with memory. I can see all the whining on Pentax discuss wanting this 
Nikon compact to be a Pentax- Luckily it is.
 
  Pl
 
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Shopping for a new body

2001-02-13 Thread Paris, Leonard

 Errm - Nikon have had this feature for *years*.  The new, 
 slick feature
 this year is that you can download the data directly to a Palm Pilot!
 
 -- 
 John Francis  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Silicon Graphics, Inc.
 (650)933-82952011 N. Shoreline Blvd. 
 MS 43U-991
 (650)932-0828 (Fax)  Mountain View, CA   94043-1389
 Hello.   My name is Darth Vader.   I am your father.   Prepare to die.
 -

What a coincidence.  They've been talking about this on the NDML, too.  :-)

Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Geography poll: cities or no cities?

2001-02-13 Thread herbet brasileiro

I can't see any security risk of having our city
known.
It's fine by me to list this information. That was the
first intention of this poll anyway.
Herbet.

--- Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Now that I've gone through all of the trouble of
 asking for and recording
 cities, I'm having second thoughts over whether or
 not to include
 them.  *L*  And I can't even blame it on Monday,
 since that was
 yesterday.  :)  So, I'm asking as a public topic of
 conversation (you
 don't have to reply privately to me for this one),
 should I include cities
 in the data, or not?  I'm not talking about the
 general summary that I'll
 post to the PDML, as that will only be broken down
 by country and
 (sometimes) state/province and will not have any
 names attached to
 it.  I'm talking about the more detailed info that
 I'll mail directly to
 everyone who submitted their location for the list. 
 What I want to know
 is whether the info should look like this:
 
 Canada, Manitoba, Winnipeg; Chris Brogden
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 
 or like this:
 
 Canada, Manitoba; Chris Brogden
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 
 
 In countries which don't have provinces or states, I
 think it would be
 more convenient to have cities listed, since it
 saves you the trouble of
 having to e-mail everyone in the vicinity and ask
 them what city they're
 in if you ever want to get together.  At the same
 time, there is always a
 bit of a security risk associated with having your
 city known, so that has
 to be assessed as well.  What does everyone think? 
 Cities, or no
 cities?  Remember, you'll never have to have anyone
 see any information
 that you're not comfortable with sharing.  If we do
 decide to go with
 cities and you don't want people to see yours, just
 send me mail at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let me know, and I'll
 remove your city (or
 anything else you want me to) from the list. 
 Thanks!
 
 chris
 
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. 
 To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
 Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
 http://pug.komkon.org .
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: MZ-S Info Not Yet

2001-02-13 Thread Matjaz Osojnik


 Several days ago, Aaron wrote:

 Don't rub it in!  MZ-S and good skiing, where the heck is this place,
 PARADISE? :)

N, it's not paradise. Although..., it is close. g

 I got a call yesterday from one of my reps who wanted to know if I was
 going to PMA.  I told him no, and he teased me that I'd miss out on the
 first introduction of the new Pentax camera (he's not a Pentax rep but
 he knows my mania).  I told him that it was too late, that a show in
 Slovenia showed it a couple of days ago.  He laughed a bit, and then
 asked, "Really?"  He thought I was making it up.  I assured him I was not.
 
 So anyhow, tell us when next year's Ljubljana show is, Matjaz, because
 me and a couple of reps are going to show up to it.  We'll get the jump
 on all those PMA types.  ;)
 
 -Aaron
 
Sure, I will let you know. :)

Matjaz



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Underwater housings for Pentax

2001-02-13 Thread Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro

Hello.

I am considering buying something to take underwater photos.
One of the options would be an underwater housing for Pentax
cameras since that is what I use above the water. The better
know manufacturers (like Ikelite) don't seem to have Pentax
models. I have found one manufacturer (reseller ?), UK-Germany,
which has housings for Z-series cameras:
http://www.uk-germany.com/engl/ukafpe.htm
MZ-series:
http://www.uk-germany.com/engl/mini.htm
flashes
http://www.uk-germany.com/engl/sysbli.htm
ans also ring flashes:
http://www.uk-germany.com/engl/peribli.htm
and even an housing for the LX:
http://www.uk-germany.com/engl/penlxpro.htm

Anybody has comments on this manufacturer or know about another
manufacturer which supports Pentax ?

Thanks in advance

-- 
http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/photos/   an half-tifoso until Canada 2000
Mark Sandman - Morphine, RIP (1952-1999/07/03, Italy)
.pt is Portugal| `Whom the gods love die young'-Menander (342-292 BC)
Europe |Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Paris, Leonard

 Preparing to be bitterly disappointed with Pentax,
 John
 
 
 =
 John Edwin Mason
 Charlottesville, Virginia
 Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Alt Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I can't believe it!  This is the PDML, after all!  We are a group of Pentax
users that are quite fond of our Pentax equipment.  If you're *that*
dissatisfied with Pentax, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way
out to your local Nikon or Canon, or whatever, dealer.

Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Flash question

2001-02-13 Thread martin tammer

Is it safe to use an older flash such as a Vivitar
2800 on a MZ-10?
Best regards - Martin

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Shopping for a new body

2001-02-13 Thread tom

Ok, ok I didn't know! I doesn't *look* like it comes off

tv

"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
 
 As does mine.  He probably never slipped the viewfinder cover off to find
 out.
 
 Len
 ---
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:27 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Shopping for a new body
 
 
  tv wrote:
 
  The Pz-1p doesn't have diopter correction.
 
  Funny, mine does.
  -
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: New MZ-S Features?

2001-02-13 Thread dick graham

How do we know it doesn't have flash exposure comp?  It might have it built 
into the new flash unit, like C and N do instead of the body as the PZ-1p has.

DG



At 12:29 PM 2/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
dick graham wrote:
 
 
  There are 2 features that I still don't know if this camera has, flash
  compensation and mid roll rewind with leader left out.

Looks like you'll have to do flash comp like on the 5n.

OTOH, not only does it leave the leader out, when you reload it it knows
how far to advance the film.

Pretty cool.

tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Flash question

2001-02-13 Thread Chris Brogden

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, martin tammer wrote:

 Is it safe to use an older flash such as a Vivitar
 2800 on a MZ-10?

As far as safety goes, I've heard that the older ones can have very high
trigger voltages and can damage your camera, while the newer ones are safe
to use.  It's one of the problems that comes with using a flash that's
been in production for so long.  If you're buying one new from a store,
don't worry abou it.  The worst that will happen is that the flash will
still fire even if your shutter speed is faster than the sync speed of the
camera (I believe this is a result of the single-pin contact).  If you
have an older 2800, check the voltage load across the contact.

chris

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: PUG Stuff

2001-02-13 Thread Dan Scott

Hi Gang, just a reminder that the PUG deadline is early this
month. We will be closing the submissions down on the 18th this
month. Five more days, so lets get scanning.
Thanks
Bill

With regards to submissions, are they only for photos taken with Pentax gear?

Thanks,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Geography poll: cities or no cities?

2001-02-13 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

I would like to see as much information as possible. Since this is a voluntary list, I 
don't think there's a privacy issue. And if anyone was concerned about protecting 
their identity and their whereabouts, he or she wouldn't have responded.
Paul

--Original Message--
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 13, 2001 6:27:04 PM GMT
Subject: Geography poll: cities or no cities?



Now that I've gone through all of the trouble of asking for and recording
cities, I'm having second thoughts over whether or not to include
them.  *L*  And I can't even blame it on Monday, since that was
yesterday.  :)  So, I'm asking as a public topic of conversation (you
don't have to reply privately to me for this one), should I include cities
in the data, or not?  I'm not talking about the general summary that I'll
post to the PDML, as that will only be broken down by country and
(sometimes) state/province and will not have any names attached to
it.  I'm talking about the more detailed info that I'll mail directly to
everyone who submitted their location for the list.  What I want to know
is whether the info should look like this:

Canada, Manitoba, Winnipeg; Chris Brogden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

or like this:

Canada, Manitoba; Chris Brogden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


In countries which don't have provinces or states, I think it would be
more convenient to have cities listed, since it saves you the trouble of
having to e-mail everyone in the vicinity and ask them what city they're
in if you ever want to get together.  At the same time, there is always a
bit of a security risk associated with having your city known, so that has
to be assessed as well.  What does everyone think?  Cities, or no
cities?  Remember, you'll never have to have anyone see any information
that you're not comfortable with sharing.  If we do decide to go with
cities and you don't want people to see yours, just send me mail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and let me know, and I'll remove your city (or
anything else you want me to) from the list.  Thanks!

chris

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

 

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Shopping for a new body

2001-02-13 Thread herbet brasileiro

Even my old PZ1 has it.
Herbet.

--- "Paris, Leonard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As does mine.  He probably never slipped the
 viewfinder cover off to find
 out.
 
 Len
 ---
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:27 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Shopping for a new body
  
  
  tv wrote:
  
  The Pz-1p doesn't have diopter correction.
  
  Funny, mine does.
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
 directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
 http://pug.komkon.org .
  
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. 
 To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
 Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
 http://pug.komkon.org .
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Practisix IIa

2001-02-13 Thread Albano_Garcia

Somebody has info and feedback on this 6x6 format camera? What about the Zeiss
80 2.8 for it? Some website? Thanks in advance.

Albano


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Shopping for a new body

2001-02-13 Thread John Francis

"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
 
  you can download the data directly to a Palm Pilot!

 What a coincidence.  They've been talking about this on the NDML, too.  :-)

I wouldn't know.  But it is a feature I would really like - being able
to automatically grab the data into a palm pilot is something I'd use.
I'd probably want to do it into my wife's Palm-III, though - she has
the accessory keyboard, which makes typing data (such as captions) a
lot easier. Especially on our European trip later on this year, when
it will be several weeks before we get back to our home computers.
I just happened to spot 'Photo Secretary for the Palm Pilot' on a Palm
accessory list, and wondered again when these Nikon features would be
available to those of us who have not fallen.

-- 
John Francis  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-82952011 N. Shoreline Blvd. MS 43U-991
(650)932-0828 (Fax)  Mountain View, CA   94043-1389
Hello.   My name is Darth Vader.   I am your father.   Prepare to die.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Manual Gear; was Re: News from PMA...

2001-02-13 Thread SudaMafud

In a message dated 2/13/01 12:49:32 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I wouldn't recommend driving any kind of McLaren in Italy ... 

But a Chevy Camaro/Pontiac Firebird are always all right anyplace in Europe.

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Vs: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Raimo Korhonen

Has the Elan real metal parts? Arent they just metal coloured plastic? What is this 
Elan called in Europe?
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen

-Alkuperinen viesti-
Lhettj: John Edwin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Piv: 13. helmikuuta 2001 19:55
Aihe: Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

I'm sitting here reading the MZ-S and Elan 7 specs,
and it looks to me like a wash.  For instance, MZ-S
wins on shutter speed (6000 vs. 4000), Elan wins on
film advance (4 fps vs. 2.5 fps).  Honestly, the
cameras look to me--partial  metal frames and
all--like they should inhabit the same part of the
market.

Isn't Pentax missing one of the hottest parts of the
SLR market?  I bet I'm one of many Pentax owners who
longs for new generation technology in the F/N80 and
Elan 7 range, but who won't even consider spending USD
900-1000 on a camera.  (Yes, I know Nikon moves a lot
of F100s, but they sell even more F/N80s.)

Preparing to be bitterly disappointed with Pentax,
John

=
John Edwin Mason
Charlottesville, Virginia
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alt Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Alexandre A. P. Suaide

I think this way. I like very much the Grand Cherokee
from Chrysler (jeep). I would like to change mine for a new one,
but, if Chrysler closes their doors I can't buy another
We must be disappointed with pentax They are not 
building cameras that can compete with nikon and canon. 
We must be disappointed to impose a change because, if Pentax didn't
change, in few years there will be no more pentax bodies to buy.


Alex


"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
 
  Preparing to be bitterly disappointed with Pentax,
  John
 
 
  =
  John Edwin Mason
  Charlottesville, Virginia
  Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Alt Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I can't believe it!  This is the PDML, after all!  We are a group of Pentax
 users that are quite fond of our Pentax equipment.  If you're *that*
 dissatisfied with Pentax, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way
 out to your local Nikon or Canon, or whatever, dealer.
 
 Len
 ---
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

-- 
---
Alexandre A. P. Suaide, Ph.D.   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Physics Department
University of Sao Paulo - BrazilPhone: 1-313-577-5419
Wayne State University - MI -USAICQ number: 78139605
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Report from PMA

2001-02-13 Thread SudaMafud

In a message dated 2/13/01 11:43:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Never have they even adjusted exposure to compensate for back lighting of 
the subject, used more than the standard fixed or a simple zoom lens, and 
rarely,
 if ever, used a tripod.  In fact, none of them even have a tripod. 

Or a Quantum battery.


Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Durability: was: Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?

2001-02-13 Thread SudaMafud

In a message dated 2/13/01 10:38:54 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The Z-1p looks like shit, film chamber is totally worn and the 
shutterblades are almost without paint due to wear.  
In Cowboy country, they call that "riding them hard and putting them away 
wet."

I take it then, you've probably wrung the best from the Z-1p and are 
immanently satisfied with its performance to date? 
*With such use-abuse, did you expect your Z-1p to last this long (5.5 years)? 
But from your description, the Z-1p sounds like a body that with average use, 
would last the average person 30 or more years, about the norm for sound 
PENTAX bodies.

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: MZ-S viewfinder magnification

2001-02-13 Thread Jens Bladt

Hello Mafud
True, I agree.
I myself tend to shoot an increasing ammount of 6x6. I never really liked
square pictures. So, I use my Pentagon/Rolleiflex as if they were a 645,
that I don't need to turn to get portrait/landscape format.

I think I'd prefere 100% coverage. For some jobs it's nice to know what's in
the picture, and what is not.

The eyepoint discussion may be about glasses (Is it?). People who are
wearing glasses, want to be able to see the whole frame too. Very
understandable.

I believe some of the fuzz is about us wanting our "idol" camera to be
perfect! Even if we do not buy one, we want to be able to say: Look what
Pentax can do, isn't that great! (By the way, I own a Pentax too!). I don't
feel this way. If I did, I'd buy a Leica R8 or M6 (and probably leave it on
a shelf in an insured cupboard, while shooting whith my Pentax Z1p or,
hopefully, my brand new MZ-S).

Best Regards
Jens

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread SudaMafud

In a message dated 2/13/01 1:05:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 * AA Battery pack/hand grip suitable for vertical shooting 

Which might break some folks of their habit of shooting 98% horizontal shots.

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread aimcompute

I believe you!

Tom C.

-Original Message-

Wanna get respect hey? You won't get that from a mere 35mm robocamera.
Instead, put up a big BOGEN tripod for your PENTAX 67ll, then hang a big,
brawny looking LEE compendium hood on that sucker. Stand back and watch
people approach the setup on tip-toes, hands in pocket, leaning and
twisting
their heads to get a better look. Watch them look up the big LEE hood at
all
that SMC glass gleaming darkly back at them.
Watch them tip-toe respectfully away to a safe distance.
Want respect heh? Move the PENTAX 67ll w/LEE onto their patio, directing
your
assistant to break out a light modifier panel or two.
*Be sure to have an expensive light meter hanging on your neck, a PENTAX 1
degree spotmeter hanging on your wrist.
Wanna get even *more* respect?
 After you've set up the two venues above, pull out an LX, telling your
clients: "I'd like to do some candids; you don't mind, do you?"
Walk around them, the less menacing LX snicking here, snicking there, your
big 50mm f/1.2 lens glaring back at them, imperiously.

snip

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread Pål Jensen

Roland wrote:

 We must consider now that the MZ-S body and shutter mechanism are far more
 expensive to manufacture than the body and shutter in the Z-1p, simply because
 that they are of higher quality.


I was told today that the MZ-S was built to more exacting standards - low tolerances. 
(it wasn't said more exacting compared to what - apparently everything else).

Pl 



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




MZ-S and flash exposure compensation

2001-02-13 Thread Carlos Royo


Hello:
I don't know if I have missed something, but I haven't seen yet any info
that explains plainly if you can use the dial on the right of the camera
to compensate the flash output as in the Z1-P, or you have to use the
same method as in the MZ-5N or Z-1.
If somebody knows the answer, please enlighten me.


--
Carlos Royo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zaragoza (Aragon) - Spain
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Full Frame Neg Carrier

2001-02-13 Thread Shel Belinkoff

I bought full frame 35mm carriers that came that way from the
factory.  The nice thing about them is that, if you want the
rough look, you can lightly run a file over them, get the look
you want, but the sides will remain square.  I have one for my
Omega, and one for the Beseler, although I think the one for the
Omega was made by an aftermarket company. The Beseler part # is
8055. 
-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

tom wrote:
 
 One that's been filed to look kind of rough.
 
 Did you buy carriers that were filed down, 
 that are full frame for a particular format, 
 or have masking blades?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




OT: Re: Manual Gear; was Re: News from PMA...

2001-02-13 Thread Gerald Cermak

Flavio Minelli writes:

 Just a little folklore:
 Here in Italy there are probably about 0.5% automatic gear cars.
 If you drive one you either are disabled or a sissy. Or both.
 Everybody here wants to be a formula 1 pilot.

From the looks of the 2000 Ferarri 360 my co-worker just purchased, the
Italians are designing nice Formula 1 cockpits with 4 wheels.  Though
without a clutch pedal, and no shifter knob (just 2 paddles behind the
steering wheel - "up shift" and "down shift"), I'm not sure if the
transmission is manual or automatic, especially since you can tell the
onboard computer to take over the shifting duties, and put it in fully
automatic.  It's quite high tech, despite the amaphroditic nature of the
transmission.  :)

Cheers,
Gerald





-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Got a new LX

2001-02-13 Thread Gerald Cermak

PAUL STENQUIST writes:

 The focus problem is caused by the same worn out mirror bumpers as the
 sticky mirror problem. Like most used LX cameras, it will require a
 sticky mirror fix. Are you in the Us? Pentax USA does it for around $170
 along with an overall CLA. (And they seem to have gotten better at it in
 recent months.) I believe the Pentax repair facilities in other parts of
 the world provide a similar service.

A few months back, at a "Pentax Day" at a local camera shop, I went in and
chatted with the sales rep and a technician doing free adjustments and
checks to Pentax cameras.  I mentioned my recently acquired LX, and he sort
of oooh'd in a good way, and mentioned that he is in line to get LX repair
training soon, and is looking forward to it.  It seems they still have high
internal regard for the LX, and take the LX and its repair quite seriously
at Pentax USA.

Cheers,
Gerald



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Pentax MZ-S makes sense

2001-02-13 Thread Jens Bladt

Hi all
A lot have been said. Sales figures will say even more..
I believe Pentax has seen the light! The 35mm SLR market is shrinking or
even dieing. PJ's will want digital cameras. Others want PS, digital PS or
Medium Format. Still it’s possible to market small, durable, nifty, capable
SLR’s for pro’s (other than the PJ’s) and for advanced amateurs/semi pro’s.
Building a huge F5-like 35mm SLR, that can do anything, can only be done
successfully if you already have A LOT of buyers that just need a new body -
e.i. Nikon/Canon. If Pentax did that, it would be suicide. Pentax reaches
the pro buyers through the 645n, the 67II and the new, small, durable, 6MP
full frame SLR (if they manage to market new lenses).

To me, the MZ-S makes perfect sense. If you guys need a “state of the art”
35mm SLR with lots of fast lenses to make a living, buy a Nikon or a Canon
like the rest. So, stop whining for crying out loud - and buy a 67II, a MZ-S
and the new digital twin. That's all you need.
Jens

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff

2001-02-13 Thread Pål Jensen

Tom wrote:

I'm asking Pal, who by all accounts appears to be
 PERSONALLY included in Pentax's inner circle, for the facts to back up the
 claims he makes.Was he formally included in a marketing survey/research
 regarding features of future Pentax products?  Does he think HIS input was
 factored into the design of the MZ-S.  Those are fairly big claims to make,
 and is pretty much what I'm getting from his statements.


You seem to be taking things far too litteral. I'm not included in any inner circles 
not worked as consultant. As Roland has pointed out, I'm refering to the wishes and 
wants from Pentax customer base over the years. From this mailing list and similar in 
Japan. There are endless posts about what people wanted in a camera and what 
crystalized out was pretty much like the MZ-S; hence I feel we have been heard. Since 
I have personally participated quite actively in these discussions I feel I've been 
heard as well. Thats it.

Pl


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: external power for AF500FTZ

2001-02-13 Thread canislupus


I still think that building it yourself is the cheapest and best solutions
(if you are at least lightly skilled with light soldering iron for tin
soldering).

Get a number of NiCd batteries (or NiMh, but NiCads are slightly better for
flashes), strong charger (I use one made for RC models charging - it can
output about 3 Ah !!! That's super-fast charging, with inteligent shut-off
to protect batteries. Slightly slower chargers are much less expensive). My
flash uses 6 AA batteries, I made my packs 7 cells (so the voltage of
NiCd/Mh matches the voltage of 6 regular alkalines, rechargables have lower
voltage). I used old cells from recycled notebooks (I got them for a
smile), but 3.5Ah or 5Ah cells are not that expensive now. I have 3.5Ah
battery pack, which lasts significantly longer than similar offers from
Quantum, can be recharged VERY quickly if needed (1.5 -2 hours at most),
and cost me not much, the price was roughly same as a Quantum pack (used)
would, but the quantum one would have about 1/2 to 1/3 capacity ! For
comparsion, 3.5Ah NiCads have about 3-5x more flashes in them than 6 AA
alkalines, and the flash recycling is many times faster.

You can check with a local RC modelling group or find one on net or find
their discussion group on net to get help I think.

Frantisek



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Practisix IIa

2001-02-13 Thread Jens Bladt

Hi Albano
Praktisix is an earlier (Nineteen Sixtees) type of Pentacon Six TL
(Maunufactured until 1996, I think).
I use Pentacon Six TL with two different viewfinders and Carl Zeiss Jena
lenses (4.0/50mm, 2.8/80mm and 2.8/120mm) Excellent lenses.
The camera has some peculiar "faults": You don't let the leaver slip  back
fast after advancing the film, you lead it slowly backwards. You never
activate the self timer when shutter is not cocked. You never advance the
film in several tempi (except when loading) - always use one continous
movement. Some cameras suffer from the "overlapping frames disease". The
Pentacon (Now makers of Exacta 66 with Schneider lenses) factory (Dresden,
Germany) still services these cameras. I got a new viewfinder screen and a
shutterspeed adjustment for apr. 100$.

The Multi Coated (MC) lenses are of course best. I would go for the latets
Pentacon Six TL if I were you.

I have some links for you, hope they work.
Please feel free to ask for more information.
If you are in the market for one look at ebay. A guy named "Cupog" has a lot
of P6 stuff up for sale.
Jens




 Die Pentacon SIX - Familie.url
 http--www.smu.edu-~rmonagha-mf-FAQexakta.txt.url
 Pentacon 6 TL SLR Medium Format Camera- Page One of Six  including Kiev 60 and Exakta 66 cameras.url
 PENTACON DRESDEN Kontaktaufnahme.url
 Praktisix-Pentacon Six the East German Medium Format System.url


RE: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Paris, Leonard



 I think this way. I like very much the Grand Cherokee
 from Chrysler (jeep). I would like to change mine for a new one,
 but, if Chrysler closes their doors I can't buy another
 We must be disappointed with pentax They are not 
 building cameras that can compete with nikon and canon. 
 We must be disappointed to impose a change because, if Pentax didn't
 change, in few years there will be no more pentax bodies to buy.
 
 
 Alex

Well, Pentax film cameras will die eventually, anyway.  Digital will take
over.  It's just a matter of when, not whether.
How Pentax competes in the market will not be effected one way or another by
a few (or a few hundred) users shouting out their disappointment.  If
anything, shouting out your disappointment will probably put off more
prospective Pentax users than anything else.  The only vote you have that
counts is where you spend your money.

If the Grand Cherokee goes away, be sure that there will be a suitable
substitute for as long as there is demand for it.  Chrysler isn't going to
produce cars that they can't sell.  Not for long, anyway.

Pentax, like any successful company, is placing their emphasis on the
equipment that sells to the greatest number of people.  Does that mean that
Pentax won't produce a super flagship camera? No, it doesn't, because I am
sure that in the company leadership there are a few folks that want this
flagship as much as we do, and their vote counts. The final say, of course
rests with the CEO and he's watching the bottom line.

Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: One for the Romanians

2001-02-13 Thread Bob Blakely

It's usually more tortuous to leave the testicles intact and whack off the little red
helmeted warrior... more frustration.

Regards,
Bob...
---
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a
well-armed lamb contesting the vote!

From: "Bob Walkden" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 . The web designer should
 have his or her balls cut off for producing such a monster.


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Geography poll: cities or no cities?

2001-02-13 Thread Kristian-H. Schüssler


- Original Message -
From: "Chris Brogden" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 7:27 PM
Subject: Geography poll: cities or no cities?


Hey Chris,
I vote for your info should look like this:

 Canada, Manitoba, Winnipeg; Chris Brogden
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

and not (not) like this:

 Canada, Manitoba; Chris Brogden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Thank you for doing this usefull work.

 Kristian-Heinrich

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Mid Roll Change

2001-02-13 Thread Peter Loveday

 Accurate frame positioning may be done perhaps with the sprocket hole count
 or something, but I can not immediately figure out how the camera can
 "remember" the frame number of the particular film which was changed mid
 roll.  If it could, it may have something to do with the data imprint but it
 is not of magnetic memory type.  So, I am not quite sure about this
 AUTOMATIC return to the frame when the film was changed mid roll.  There is
 no point in speculating but I am just curious and perhaps someone with
 better brain could give me a hint or two for me to play with while waiting
 for the full spec :-)

I was wondering the same thing... I can't see any way to identify a specific
film, or to detect which frames have been imprinted.  Unless the exposure of
the imprint changes the electrostatic signature of the media significantly
or something, but that seems unlikely.

I guess it could 'remember' frame number for one film, so as to allow you
to alternate between two.  Or, given DX coding, it could remember frame
numbers for several, as long as they all were different ASA on each one.
Actually, the DX code not only identifies ASA but also number of exposures
and exposure latitude.  But it still would not identify transparency vs
negative of the same ASA, or colour vs black and white.

Maybe it punches a hole between frames that it can detect later, or something.

Just guessing really.

- Peter


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: WTB: K-series normal lens

2001-02-13 Thread canislupus

I'm also looking for the cap that screws on top of the wind
lever if anyone has access to any source for old parts.

Mark

Mark, K2 really benefits from being cleaned. Especially the
exposure-compensation and MLU lever got much more easiter to operate after
I clened the whole camera (K2DMD). It's also an enjoyable process! Seeing
all the great designing under the hull of K2 cameras...

I lost that *damned* cap too... ;( At local Pentax repair, they sold me for
1$ a chrome one, from god knows what body. I painted it black, and it looks
like original. Try to contact any Pentax service, they could have that part
even original or similar.

Frantisek (looking for the plastic piece in winding lever of Olympus 35 SPn
:)

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Fasten seatbelts: MZ-S price!!

2001-02-13 Thread Gerald Cermak

Wieland Willker suggests:

  Here in Norway the MZ-S will cost appoximately $1700.

 This is about the same price as a 645 N body. Folks, the chance! Switch
 over to 645! But probably Pentax intended just this? ;-)

What?!?!?!  And give up 36 exposures per roll?  1 hour mini-lab development?
Add the incremental cost of a medium format scanner, and the 645 lenses - oh
the price of the lenses!  Never in my house.  :)

Cheers,
Gerald



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: old exposure meters

2001-02-13 Thread Tiger Moses

At 03:08 PM 2/13/01 -0600, you wrote:
Hi all,

Anyone familiar with old, batteryless, exposure meters--specifically a GE
Type DW-68 (made of metal and glass, takes readings with "cover closed",
"cover open", and "hood off")? Were these any good/very accurate? If so,
how would you operate it?

Dan Scott (I'd RTFM if I had it)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

your meter needle usually point to a number 1-10
you then set your film speed somewhere
then you slide a pointer until it point to the number the needle pointed to
then you will have a choice of combinations of aperature/shutters that will
give you a 'proper exposure'

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Full Frame Neg Carrier

2001-02-13 Thread tom

Shel Belinkoff wrote:
 
 Hi Tom,
 
 We talked about this a few weeks ago, and  I think it was Ed who
 said he did this.  However, I mentioned that I  liked full
 frame  printing as well, and purchased a carrier on eBay.  I now
 have several "factory" full frame carriers.  Which are you
 looking for?

One that's been filed to look kind of rough. 

Did you buy carriers that were filed down, that are full frame for a
particular format, or have masking blades?

tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Photography Clubs.

2001-02-13 Thread Tiger Moses

I belong to a photoclub
our website is www.blkbox.com/nwhpc
we meet 1st  3rd tuesdays
1st meeting is educational
2nd meeting is competition, rotating between prints/slides
peer voting with ribbons awarded
lots of fun, I like after meetigns where 4-10 of us go to eat dinner and
discuss the same stuff we do here, but its a diverse branded crowd

Ocassionally a group will go shoot together

At 04:24 PM 2/13/01 EST, you wrote:
Now that Chris has the widespread Pentax community awareness well under way,  
I I would like to hear from those of you who are active in photography clubs 
- what does your club do? - main interests of group? - competition or/and 
image education?
You can e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards, 
Ed Matthew
Indianapolis  IN
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Shopping for a new body

2001-02-13 Thread Carlos Royo



tom wrote:
 
 The Pz-1p doesn't have diopter correction.
 

It does have diopter correction, Tom.

--
Carlos Royo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zaragoza (Aragon) - Spain
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Mixed feelings about MZ-S

2001-02-13 Thread Gianfranco Irlanda

John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The beauty of Huper-Program is that you could switch freely between
all three modes in a single step.

I must confess I do not like much the HyP mode on the Z-1p, because I always
try to modify the aperture by turning the front dial... (it is hard to hold
the camera still while moving the thumb around).
I am very fond of the Hyper Manual mode instead: you chose the aperture via
the ring on the lens and switch to the program line (AV line) by pressing the
IF button.
I think I'll find the layout of the MZ-S more comfortable.

Gianfranco


Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




  1   2   >