Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Baiju M

On 9/28/06, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Please provide fixes and tests on the trunk and the 3.3 branch.


What about 3.2, dropped ?

Regards,
Baiju M
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

Baiju M wrote:
 On 9/28/06, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Please provide fixes and tests on the trunk and the 3.3 branch.
 
 What about 3.2, dropped ?

Of course you can provide them for 3.2 as well. I'm not sure whether
it's officially maintained anymore now ... My understanding was that we
support: Current stable branch (3.3) + trunk

Only during release time, we support three branches, e.g. yesterday it
was: Stable (3.2) + In-Release (3.3) + trunk

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh  co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen

Christian Theune wrote:

Morning,

Baiju M wrote:

Hi,
  What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?


Right now it's still Python 2.4, as Zope 3.4 is scheduled for next year,
we should consider using Python 2.5 though.


We should definitely try to *support* Python 2.5, but we can't require 
it till Zope 2 has been certified for it.

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen

Christian Theune wrote:

Hi,

Baiju M wrote:

On 9/28/06, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Please provide fixes and tests on the trunk and the 3.3 branch.

What about 3.2, dropped ?


Of course you can provide them for 3.2 as well. I'm not sure whether
it's officially maintained anymore now ... My understanding was that we
support: Current stable branch (3.3) + trunk


No! 3.2 is maintained. Bugfixes will *first go to the 3.2 branch*. This 
is important, as Zope 3.2 is not only used out there in deployments but 
also part of Zope 2.9 which will increase its life time a lot more.



Only during release time, we support three branches, e.g. yesterday it
was: Stable (3.2) + In-Release (3.3) + trunk


No.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
 Christian Theune wrote:
 Hi,

 Baiju M wrote:
 On 9/28/06, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Please provide fixes and tests on the trunk and the 3.3 branch.
 What about 3.2, dropped ?

 Of course you can provide them for 3.2 as well. I'm not sure whether
 it's officially maintained anymore now ... My understanding was that we
 support: Current stable branch (3.3) + trunk
 
 No! 3.2 is maintained. Bugfixes will *first go to the 3.2 branch*. This
 is important, as Zope 3.2 is not only used out there in deployments but
 also part of Zope 2.9 which will increase its life time a lot more.
 
 Only during release time, we support three branches, e.g. yesterday it
 was: Stable (3.2) + In-Release (3.3) + trunk
 
 No.

Can you repeat the specific rule for me?

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh  co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen

Christian Theune wrote:

Hi,

I saw some updates in the wiki tonight and thought I'll catch up with
some stuff too.

As I opted to take care for the Zope 3.4 release and Zope 3.3 is out of
the door since yesterday, I've updated the roadmap.

(Someone correct me if my information is out-dated)

Current focus: Bug fixing Zope 3.3
--

Currently, we're aiming for a Zope 3.3 bugfix release (3.3.1) in
November, which is managed by Martijn. Everybody is very encouraged to
take a look at the collector and fix bugs instead of introducing new
functionality. Please provide fixes and tests on the trunk and the 3.3
branch.


... *after* having it fixed on the 3.2 branch *first*. I'm the 3.2 
bugfix manager and hope that we can soon have a 3.2.2 bugfix release as 
well.



Next milestone: Zope 3.4


Due to the late release date for Zope 3.3 and the amount of open bugs,
Zope 3.4 will be postponed one release cycle and will be released in May
2007.

The largest project that I know of that aims for Zope 3.4 will be the
eggification of Zope 3.

I haven't seen a formal proposal for this yet, but AFAIK this is Jim's pet.

Anybody else with larger features that are planned to go in for Zope 3.4?


I want to make most of the browser:* directives saner in implementation, 
without actually changing their behaviour, though. Unless people want to 
make their behaviour saner, too ;).

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen

Christian Theune wrote:

Hi,

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:

Christian Theune wrote:

Hi,

Baiju M wrote:

On 9/28/06, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Please provide fixes and tests on the trunk and the 3.3 branch.

What about 3.2, dropped ?

Of course you can provide them for 3.2 as well. I'm not sure whether
it's officially maintained anymore now ... My understanding was that we
support: Current stable branch (3.3) + trunk

No! 3.2 is maintained. Bugfixes will *first go to the 3.2 branch*. This
is important, as Zope 3.2 is not only used out there in deployments but
also part of Zope 2.9 which will increase its life time a lot more.


Only during release time, we support three branches, e.g. yesterday it
was: Stable (3.2) + In-Release (3.3) + trunk

No.


Can you repeat the specific rule for me?


We'll repeat two stable branches, just like Zope 2.

So, Zope 2 currently maintains 2.9 and 2.10. We maintain the Zope 3 
counterparts, 3.2 and 3.3.

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
 I want to make most of the browser:* directives saner in implementation,
 without actually changing their behaviour, though. Unless people want to
 make their behaviour saner, too ;).

I wouldn't mind making myself behave saner. :)

As we're at it: I forgot to mention that the Blob project is still alive
and got some rejuvenation in the last days by making the unit tests
almost run on windows. (One problem with packing). So upgrading the ZODB
would be another step.

Something that I imagine could happen alongside the eggification is to
do a kind of spring cleaning and check for the modules that won't be
core-modules in the future - and decide how people will be able to still
use them.

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh  co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen

Christian Theune wrote:

Hi,

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:

I want to make most of the browser:* directives saner in implementation,
without actually changing their behaviour, though. Unless people want to
make their behaviour saner, too ;).


I wouldn't mind making myself behave saner. :)

As we're at it: I forgot to mention that the Blob project is still alive
and got some rejuvenation in the last days by making the unit tests
almost run on windows. (One problem with packing). So upgrading the ZODB
would be another step.

Something that I imagine could happen alongside the eggification is to
do a kind of spring cleaning and check for the modules that won't be
core-modules in the future - and decide how people will be able to still
use them.


Yup.

There are some things in zope.app (e.g. workflow, externaleditor, 
zopetop, module, schemacontent) that aren't shipped with a Zope 3 
install and don't seem to be maintained anymore. I suggest that if 
no-one steps up for them they will simply be deleted.


There are also some things in zope.app that may be maintained but never 
shipped. These things don't really belong in zope.app, IMO (boston, 
homefolder, styleguide, css) and should probably be moved out. 
Discussions with their individual authors/maintainers will be necessary.


Philipp
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
 Christian Theune wrote:
 Hi,

 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
 I want to make most of the browser:* directives saner in implementation,
 without actually changing their behaviour, though. Unless people want to
 make their behaviour saner, too ;).

 I wouldn't mind making myself behave saner. :)

 As we're at it: I forgot to mention that the Blob project is still alive
 and got some rejuvenation in the last days by making the unit tests
 almost run on windows. (One problem with packing). So upgrading the ZODB
 would be another step.

 Something that I imagine could happen alongside the eggification is to
 do a kind of spring cleaning and check for the modules that won't be
 core-modules in the future - and decide how people will be able to still
 use them.
 
 Yup.
 
 There are some things in zope.app (e.g. workflow, externaleditor,
 zopetop, module, schemacontent) that aren't shipped with a Zope 3
 install and don't seem to be maintained anymore. I suggest that if
 no-one steps up for them they will simply be deleted.
 
 There are also some things in zope.app that may be maintained but never
 shipped. These things don't really belong in zope.app, IMO (boston,
 homefolder, styleguide, css) and should probably be moved out.
 Discussions with their individual authors/maintainers will be necessary.

I agree on that. I'll put that on the prospective feature list so we
don't forget about it.

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh  co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Chris Withers

Baiju M wrote:

Hi,
  What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?


That would be loverly for both 3.4 and 2.11 :-D

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: zcml questions

2006-09-28 Thread Chris Withers

Jim Fulton wrote:


That's pretty much what I suggested.  The whole point of discriminators 
was conflict detection.  That is why I suggested extending actions to 
support identifiers that could be used for overriding or disabling even 
for actions (or groups of actions) that don't otherwise conflict.  This 
id scheme would leverage discriminators when present.


Sounds cool, I only wish I could offer to help make it happen :-)

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen

Martijn Faassen wrote:

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:

Christian Theune wrote:

Morning,

Baiju M wrote:

Hi,
  What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?


Right now it's still Python 2.4, as Zope 3.4 is scheduled for next year,
we should consider using Python 2.5 though.


We should definitely try to *support* Python 2.5, but we can't require 
it till Zope 2 has been certified for it.


I don't think we should commit to any official support for more than 1 
Python version for a particular Zope. So either we certify Zope 2.11 for 
Python 2.5, or we stick to Python 2.4.


Fine by me.


My preference would be to get Zope 2.11 up to speed.


If you're willing to do it :).


The last time this was discussed with Jim, the idea was to try to use
Zope 3's security proxy approach in Zope 2 for Python Script security
- Jim and I had some ideas I need to dredge up from the back of my
mind.


That would of course be a great idea. Death to guarded_getattr!
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3.3.0 released!

2006-09-28 Thread KLEIN Stéphane

2006/9/27, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On behalf of the Zope 3 development team I'm proud to announce the final
Zope 3.3.0 release. There were no changes since the 3.3.0 release candidate.


...



Thanks goes to everyone who contributed.


There aren't AUTHORS file (zope 3 authors list) ?

Stephane
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.3.0 released!

2006-09-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen

KLEIN Stéphane wrote:

2006/9/27, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On behalf of the Zope 3 development team I'm proud to announce the final
Zope 3.3.0 release. There were no changes since the 3.3.0 release 
candidate.


...



Thanks goes to everyone who contributed.


There aren't AUTHORS file (zope 3 authors list) ?


See CHANGES.txt and CREDITS.txt
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Fulton

Baiju M wrote:

Hi,
  What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?


That's a good question.  I fear it will take a fair bit of work to
get to it and, frankly for me there are higher priorities.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

2006-09-28 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/

Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7911
Blamelist: faassen,romanofski

BUILD FAILED: failed test_2

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze

2006-09-28 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze.

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/

Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7911
Blamelist: faassen,romanofski

BUILD FAILED: failed test_2

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 trunk 2.4 FreeBSD tmiddleton

2006-09-28 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 FreeBSD tmiddleton.

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/

Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7911
Blamelist: faassen,romanofski

BUILD FAILED: failed test_2

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Fulton

Christian Theune wrote:

Hi,

I saw some updates in the wiki tonight and thought I'll catch up with
some stuff too.

As I opted to take care for the Zope 3.4 release and Zope 3.3 is out of
the door since yesterday, I've updated the roadmap.


http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/RoadMap



(Someone correct me if my information is out-dated)

Current focus: Bug fixing Zope 3.3
--

Currently, we're aiming for a Zope 3.3 bugfix release (3.3.1) in
November, which is managed by Martijn. Everybody is very encouraged to
take a look at the collector and fix bugs instead of introducing new
functionality. Please provide fixes and tests on the trunk and the 3.3
branch.

Next milestone: Zope 3.4


Due to the late release date for Zope 3.3 and the amount of open bugs,
Zope 3.4 will be postponed one release cycle and will be released in May
2007.


Yup

I think we should move the alpha and beta schedules up. IMO, we should
schedule the first beta and thus the feature freeze for early April.


The largest project that I know of that aims for Zope 3.4 will be the
eggification of Zope 3.


Yup.  I fear that we if decide to support Python 2.5, that will be a
bigger project.


I haven't seen a formal proposal for this yet,


Good point.


but AFAIK this is Jim's pet.


k

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Fulton

Chris Withers wrote:

Baiju M wrote:

Hi,
  What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?


That would be loverly for both 3.4 and 2.11 :-D


I think it will require a huge effort to get Zope 2 working with
Python 2.5.  Either:

- We need to change Zope 2 to use Zope 3's security system, or

- the RestrictedPython package will need to be reengineered to work with
  the substantially changed Python compiler and many new language features.

I suspect that even Zope 3's security system will need a fair bit of work:

- We need to rework or replace the small bit of RestrictedPython we use, and

- If new Python type slots have been added, we'll need to reflect them in 
zope.proxy.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Heads up: Zope 3.2.2 on Saturday

2006-09-28 Thread Adam Groszer
Hello Philipp,

Thursday, September 28, 2006, 3:48:34 PM, you wrote:


 By the way, it'd be cool if someone could do the Windows release. See
 http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ZopeWindowsRelease for more info.

I'm raising my hand. Doing it is OK, Updating the wiki page will take
some time.

-- 
Best regards,
 Adammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Quote of the day:
Every word is like an unnecessary stain on silence and nothingness.Everyone 
will experience the consequences of his own acts.  If his acts are right, he'll 
get good consequences; if they're not, he'll suffer for it. (Harry Browne)

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3.3.1 and 3.4

2006-09-28 Thread Christian Theune
Jim Fulton wrote:
 As I opted to take care for the Zope 3.4 release and Zope 3.3 is out of
 the door since yesterday, I've updated the roadmap.
 
 http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/RoadMap

Jup.

 I think we should move the alpha and beta schedules up. IMO, we should
 schedule the first beta and thus the feature freeze for early April.

Ah. Thanks for bringing that up. I thought about that already but forgot
about that. I already thought the test times are too short. I'll move
them up as suggested.

 The largest project that I know of that aims for Zope 3.4 will be the
 eggification of Zope 3.
 
 Yup.  I fear that we if decide to support Python 2.5, that will be a
 bigger project.

Ok. Something to do for Zope 3.5!

-- 
gocept gmbh  co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Fulton

Martijn Faassen wrote:

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:

Christian Theune wrote:

Morning,

Baiju M wrote:

Hi,
  What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?


Right now it's still Python 2.4, as Zope 3.4 is scheduled for next year,
we should consider using Python 2.5 though.


We should definitely try to *support* Python 2.5, but we can't require 
it till Zope 2 has been certified for it.


I don't think we should commit to any official support for more than 1 
Python version for a particular Zope. So either we certify Zope 2.11 for 
Python 2.5, or we stick to Python 2.4.


My preference would be to get Zope 2.11 up to speed. The last time this 
was discussed with Jim, the idea was to try to use Zope 3's security 
proxy approach in Zope 2 for Python Script security - Jim and I had some 
ideas I need to dredge up from the back of my mind.


Jim, do you remember what was required?


Not exactly, but it was a lot of work.

See my other note about special challenges of 2.5 wrt security.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Heads up: Zope 3.2.2 on Saturday

2006-09-28 Thread Adam Groszer
Hello Philipp,

BTW, correct me if I'm wrong, bugfixes go into:
/repos/main/Zope3/branches/3.2
and
/repos/main/Zope3/branches/3.3

Releases get built from:
/repos/main/Zope3/tags/Zope-3.2.2
and
/repos/main/Zope3/tags/Zope-3.3.1

-- 
Best regards,
 Groszer Adam
--
Quote of the day:
Feast, and your halls are crowded; fast, and the world goes by. 
- Ella Wheeler Wilcox 

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Heads up: Zope 3.2.2 on Saturday

2006-09-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen

Adam Groszer wrote:

Hello Philipp,

BTW, correct me if I'm wrong, bugfixes go into:
/repos/main/Zope3/branches/3.2
and
/repos/main/Zope3/branches/3.3


... and the trunk. Correct.


Releases get built from:
/repos/main/Zope3/tags/Zope-3.2.2
and
/repos/main/Zope3/tags/Zope-3.3.1


Yup.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze

2006-09-28 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze.

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/

Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7913
Blamelist: fdrake,romanofski,yusei

BUILD FAILED: failed test_2

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 trunk 2.4 FreeBSD tmiddleton

2006-09-28 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 FreeBSD tmiddleton.

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/

Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7913
Blamelist: fdrake,romanofski,yusei

BUILD FAILED: failed test_2

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Martijn Faassen

Jim Fulton wrote:

Baiju M wrote:

Hi,
  What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?


That's a good question.  I fear it will take a fair bit of work to
get to it and, frankly for me there are higher priorities.


I think we'd be okay in not supporting Python 2.5 yet for this release. 
Python 2.5 has just been released, and the 9 months or so will give it 
time to gell out, Python extensions a bit of time to catch up with the 
newer version, and for us to do some experimenting. Linux distributions 
will likely still be supporting Python 2.4 (along with 2.5) at that 
stage as well.


So unless a volunteer steps up to do lots of hard work between now and 
march next year, let's stick with Python 2.4. Otherwise let's plan it in 
for Zope 3.5 and Zope 2.12


Regards,

Martijn
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Dieter Maurer
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-28 11:22 +0200:
 ...
 The last time this was discussed with Jim, the idea was to try to use
 Zope 3's security proxy approach in Zope 2 for Python Script security
 - Jim and I had some ideas I need to dredge up from the back of my
 mind.

I am quite fearful in this regard:

  Lots of existing code rely on the fact that trusted code
  can do anything without to worry about security.

  As security proxies restrict trusted code, too (though trusted
  code can remove the wrapper), we might get more security
  at the cost of massive backward incompatibility.

-- 
Dieter
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Christian Theune

Dieter Maurer wrote:


Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-28 11:22 +0200:
 


...
   


The last time this was discussed with Jim, the idea was to try to use
Zope 3's security proxy approach in Zope 2 for Python Script security
- Jim and I had some ideas I need to dredge up from the back of my
mind.
 



I am quite fearful in this regard:

 Lots of existing code rely on the fact that trusted code
 can do anything without to worry about security.

 As security proxies restrict trusted code, too (though trusted
 code can remove the wrapper), we might get more security
 at the cost of massive backward incompatibility.
 

As Zope 2 and Zope 3 merge in the long run, we'll have to worry about 
this at one point. The major question nowadays is: do we want/need to do 
it right now, or can we/should we procrastinate on this topic.


Christian
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Jeff Shell

On 9/28/06, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Christian Theune wrote:
 Morning,

 Baiju M wrote:
 Hi,
   What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?

 Right now it's still Python 2.4, as Zope 3.4 is scheduled for next year,
 we should consider using Python 2.5 though.

We should definitely try to *support* Python 2.5, but we can't require
it till Zope 2 has been certified for it.


Why isn't Python 2.5 even supported at present? Does Zope 3.3.0
flat-out break when run on 2.5? Or does Zope 3.3 + Python 2.5 work,
but it hasn't been tested enough to say it's usable, but not
required?

--
Jeff Shell
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Fulton

Dieter Maurer wrote:

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-28 11:22 +0200:

...

The last time this was discussed with Jim, the idea was to try to use
Zope 3's security proxy approach in Zope 2 for Python Script security
- Jim and I had some ideas I need to dredge up from the back of my
mind.


I am quite fearful in this regard:

  Lots of existing code rely on the fact that trusted code
  can do anything without to worry about security.

  As security proxies restrict trusted code, too (though trusted
  code can remove the wrapper), we might get more security
  at the cost of massive backward incompatibility.


Yup. This is a real danger.  My original plan was to allow either
policy, making the Zope 3 policy optional.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Fulton

Jeff Shell wrote:

On 9/28/06, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Christian Theune wrote:
 Morning,

 Baiju M wrote:
 Hi,
   What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?

 Right now it's still Python 2.4, as Zope 3.4 is scheduled for next 
year,

 we should consider using Python 2.5 though.

We should definitely try to *support* Python 2.5, but we can't require
it till Zope 2 has been certified for it.


Why isn't Python 2.5 even supported at present?


There are lots of test failures.  Also, untrusted Python code doesn't
work with 2.5 due to major changes in the compiler. (Zope 3 does almost
no custom Python compiling, but it does do some.)

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Fix the roadmap

2006-09-28 Thread Douglas Douglas
Hi everybody.

I noticed this in the roadmap.

Planned schedule

* Zope 3.4 alpha 1: mid-April, 2006
* Zope 3.4 beta 1: first week in May, 2006
* Zope 3.4 RC 1: mid-May, 2006
* Zope 3.4 final: last week of May, 2006

Shouldn't those be 2007?


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: Re: [Zope3-dev] Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Jeff Shell

On 9/28/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jim Fulton wrote:
 Baiju M wrote:
 Hi,
   What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?

 That's a good question.  I fear it will take a fair bit of work to
 get to it and, frankly for me there are higher priorities.

I think we'd be okay in not supporting Python 2.5 yet for this release.
Python 2.5 has just been released, and the 9 months or so will give it
time to gell out, Python extensions a bit of time to catch up with the
newer version, and for us to do some experimenting. Linux distributions
will likely still be supporting Python 2.4 (along with 2.5) at that
stage as well.


Are you talking not-supporting Python 2.5 at all? Or just not wanting to
require it?

If Zope 3 can't at least run on Python 2.5 within three months of Python 2.5's
release, I don't think that looks good for us. I would hope that by being more
Pythonic and free from the old ExtensionClass magic - especially in Zope 3 -
that Zope could keep better pace with Python. But nine months? A year? Can I
expect the developers of toolkits we use, in some cases more heavily than Zope
itself, like SQLAlchemy to hold off on requiring Python 2.5 for that long?


So unless a volunteer steps up to do lots of hard work between now and
march next year, let's stick with Python 2.4. Otherwise let's plan it in
for Zope 3.5 and Zope 2.12


I really really really hope it doesn't take that long to be able to at least
run on Python 2.5: even if it has to be with some caveats or mild warnings.

If security and restricted python / security proxies are the main issue, what
about if one is running Zope sites with absolutely ZERO through the web code -
no page templates, nothing - can't there be a lighter weight security
implementation that wouldn't take half a year of lots of hard work?

--
Jeff Shell
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 branches 3.3 2.4 Linux remy

2006-09-28 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.3 2.4 Linux remy.

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/

Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7921
Blamelist: faassen,fdrake,jim,romanofski,wosc,yuppie,yusei

BUILD FAILED: failed test

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: Re: Use launchpad ! (was Re: [Zope3-dev] the maintenance of change logs)

2006-09-28 Thread Jeff Shell

On 9/25/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Baiju M wrote:
 On 9/22/06, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snip
 Finally, I'm experimenting with using launchpad for bugs:

https://launchpad.net/products/zc.buildout/+bugs

 and feature requests:

https://features.launchpad.net/products/zc.buildout/

 So far this is working OK. I haven't really stressed it. Launchpad
 makes this very easy to set up and I don't think they are allergic to
 having us create lots of projects.

 Let's move Zope3 issue collector to launchpad?
 (Once this discussion came to ZF list, I think there were more +1)

Before we move any issue collectors to launchpad, we need a bit more
experience with the launchpad issue tracker and its capabilities. I'm
also wonder whether launchpad has good issue export facilities in case
we want to move to another system.

With Tres, I think we should also explore options like Trac. I
personally think Trac has attractive features in the way it integrates
the development process into things like an issue tracker.


I love Trac. I've never installed it or used it to manage any projects
on my own, but I find that I stay on top of open source projects more
if they're using Trac.

On a small aesthetics side, I find Launchpad's side bars incredibly
distracting, and I don't like looking at the page because it feels
like there are too many things vying for my attention and I have a
hard time really reading the text in front of me. The content gets
squished. And then I find myself looking at all of these links and
buttons around the page trying to figure out what has the information
I'm interested in. The sidebar on Zope.org bothers me in the same way
when I try to read the Zope 3 wiki - but Zope.org feels nowhere near
as noisy as Launchpad. I'm sure their tools are great, and the hosting
service is a good feature.

But my temper is short these days. My attention span is not: if I can
find and read a page that's not full of distractions, I'll stay and
read it and learn. But when there are boxes on all sides chock full of
colors and links, reading is much harder.

A nice simple example is this nice page in SQLAlchemy's Trac wiki (a
page I read over and over as I migrated code to 0.2):

http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/02Migration

It's very nice. I can read that page, print it, save it to a local
permanent archive, etc.

There is something about Trac's feature set, implementation, and in
how it's installed (in most cases) that make it very nice for a
cantankerous, stressed out, often overburdened worker like me to stay
on top of and even want to get involved (even on some small level)
with a project - and that I can do this in small amounts of time. The
Zope 3 wiki, collector, and even subversion browser, all feel like
they require more of a full time job to stay involved. And if not a
full time job, then at least some seriously set-aside time. It's very
hard to get answers to what's gone on recently?, what are all of
the bugs, and let me see and sort them quickly on some different
criteria, and let me then see how they were fixed, and then let me
quickly find some minor annoyance issues that I might be able to fix.
With a Trac setup like SQLAlchemy is using, I feel like I can do this
at home in the morning during my browse-and-drink-coffee-time. With
the current Zope tools (and my limited experience with Launchpad's
tools), it does not feel casual at all to keep up with everything
going on. And that makes it hard to stay enthusiastic and energized
about a project.

Compare:

- http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/RoadMap

- http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/milestone/0.3.0?by=severity

I wish there had been something like that Trac milestone page for Zope
3.3. Of course, it doesn't show everything going on. But it would have
made it much easier to find out what may have been slowing the release
down so much, and then easier to want to get involved and make it
happen sooner.

The lack of distracting side columns, the integration of the Wiki, the
Roadmaps/Milestones, the Subversion integration (being able to refer
to tickets, wiki pages, etc in commit log messages and having the
links generated in the web. [ticket:309], etc), the custom issue
tracker reports: it's a very nice system to use, even casually.

The Timeline is like a Wiki's Recent Changes on crack. Except the
crack is filled with helpful vitamins: recent wiki changes, recent
checkins, recent issue tracker activity (bugs submitted, opened,
closed). It just feels so much more alive.

--
Jeff Shell
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] test for security in unit tests?

2006-09-28 Thread Roy Mathew

Hi Folks,

I find that testing for security is hard, since the default user in
the doctests seems to have unrestricted access to all methods and
attributes. Is there a unit-test friendly way of faking a user
with a more restricted role, so that I can reproduce security errors
in unit tests?

Thanks,
Roy Mathew

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



[Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jeff Shell wrote:
 On 9/28/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jim Fulton wrote:
  Baiju M wrote:
  Hi,
What is the target Python version for Zope 3.4, is it Python 2.5?
 
  That's a good question.  I fear it will take a fair bit of work to
  get to it and, frankly for me there are higher priorities.

 I think we'd be okay in not supporting Python 2.5 yet for this release.
 Python 2.5 has just been released, and the 9 months or so will give it
 time to gell out, Python extensions a bit of time to catch up with the
 newer version, and for us to do some experimenting. Linux distributions
 will likely still be supporting Python 2.4 (along with 2.5) at that
 stage as well.
 
 Are you talking not-supporting Python 2.5 at all? Or just not wanting to
 require it?

The proposal is not to support it at all, unless somebody takes one for
the team and works out all the nasty breakage which 2.5 induces on Zope.

 If Zope 3 can't at least run on Python 2.5 within three months of
 Python 2.5's release, I don't think that looks good for us. I would
 hope that by being more Pythonic and free from the old
 ExtensionClass magic - especially in Zope 3 - that Zope could keep
 better pace with Python. But nine months? A year? Can I expect the
 developers of toolkits we use, in some cases more heavily than Zope 
 itself, like SQLAlchemy to hold off on requiring Python 2.5 for that
 long?

The change from 2.4 to 2.5 is *massively* disruptive for a framework
like Zope:  much more so than any change since 2.2, I think (maybe even
2.0/2.1).  The hardest bit is the change to the way the compiler works:
 RestrictedPython is completely incompatible with the new AST-based
strategy.

 So unless a volunteer steps up to do lots of hard work between now and
 march next year, let's stick with Python 2.4. Otherwise let's plan it in
 for Zope 3.5 and Zope 2.12
 
 I really really really hope it doesn't take that long to be able to
 at least run on Python 2.5: even if it has to be with some caveats or
 mild warnings.
 
 If security and restricted python / security proxies are the main
 issue, what about if one is running Zope sites with absolutely ZERO
 through the web code - no page templates, nothing - can't there be a
 lighter weight security implementation that wouldn't take half a year
 of lots of hard work?

Even if you have no templates defined TTW, Zope3's security machiner
still needs some support from RestrictedPython for handling
filesystem-based templates.


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 202-558-7113  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFHJr3+gerLs4ltQ4RAnmFAKCuFkvWIAVn60mLP8AIik9LcttATgCcDrIL
KQjhDIoPaj9N9pL1JHGIZU4=
=D1Zt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Python version for Zope 3.4 ?

2006-09-28 Thread Andreas Jung



--On 28. September 2006 16:17:54 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We should definitely try to *support* Python 2.5, but we can't require
it till Zope 2 has been certified for it.


Why isn't Python 2.5 even supported at present?


There are lots of test failures.  Also, untrusted Python code doesn't
work with 2.5 due to major changes in the compiler. (Zope 3 does almost
no custom Python compiling, but it does do some.)



Also Zope 2.10 dies under Python 2.5 with some famous crashs.

-aj

pgpbvMiP3G4pc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com



Re: [Zope3-dev] Fix the roadmap

2006-09-28 Thread Christian Theune


Douglas Douglas wrote:
 Hi everybody.
 
 I noticed this in the roadmap.
 
 Planned schedule
 
 * Zope 3.4 alpha 1: mid-April, 2006
 * Zope 3.4 beta 1: first week in May, 2006
 * Zope 3.4 RC 1: mid-May, 2006
 * Zope 3.4 final: last week of May, 2006
 
 Shouldn't those be 2007?

Sure. I'm living off-calendar. =)

I'm putting in the changes to the test period as well, as nobody
objected since yesterday.

Thanks for the hint.

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh  co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com