Or you could just get users accustomed to using UPNs for logon and avoid the
problem. :-)
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Grillenmeier, Guido
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:42 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject:
I've
not looked at the log, but you can't just move a CA to another machine with the
same name. You have to back up the old CA's keys anddatabase and install
Certificate Services on the new machine, performing an advanced setup and
telling it that you have an existing key to use for the
Ah,
gotcha. Quick question, then- have you tried backing up the keys and certs
again, then uninstalling and reinstalling certificate services on the
machine?
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WATSON,
BENSent: Friday, July 14, 2006 1:30
Also,
one last item- you said that this is a standalone CA, correct? (sorry for
missing your first e-mails; I didn't read far enough down. I blame
ADD.)
Standalone CAs don't use or store information in AD; enterprise CAs do.
If you're trying to obtain certificates from a standalone CA via
Okay,
skimming back to your original mail, I suspect that you did not have a
standalone CA in the first place, which may be the cause of your problem. You
probably should try reinstalling the CA as an enterprise CA and see if your
problems clear up. Sorry for the multiple responses; I'm
Title: Group Policy won't rerun
No,
but if you ghosted the laptop after you uninstalled via Add/Remove programs, you
ghosted the registry entries that are keeping it from
reinstalling.
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stu
PackettSent:
With
the Print Management Consolethat was introduced with Win2K3 R2, managing
printers is *significantly* easier and ACLing them appropriately becomes a more
realistic task. It's also now downloadable separately from R2 and will run on
Win2K3 SP1+.
What
is "everything [you] need", specifically?
Thanks,
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
HogenauerSent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:49 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Enumerating Group
type and Mebership...
ADFS, at this time, is able to consume SAML 1.1 tokens. It does not,
however, fully support either the SAML 1.1 or 2.0 specifications. ADFS does
not currently construct SAML 1.1 or 2.0 tokens, does not support the rest of
the SAML specifications and does not support consumption of SAML 2.0 tokens.
Whoops, folks, I need to amend one statement below- ADFS does construct SAML
1.1 tokens (assertions), but not 2.0.
Thanks!
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:49 PM
If you
delete what? The GPO?
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
StrongoskySent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 7:08 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Question on
"restricted group" policy.
Hey,
Created a
Two
quick questions-
1. Are
you positive there are no IPsec policies applied to this
machine?
2. Are
you also positive that the machines from which you've been testing *also* have
no IPsec policies in place?
I
can't think of a reason why this problem would surface only after you'd
all
configuration:---
Operational
mode
= DisableThis is increasingly looking like a bug in the tcpip
stack --what do you think laura ? activedir group
?
On 7/29/06, Laura A.
Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Two quick
quest
al
mode
= DisableThis is increasingly looking like a bug in the tcpip
stack --what do you think laura ? activedir group
?
On 7/29/06, Laura A.
Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Two quick
questions-
1. Are you positive there
are no IPsec policies applied to th
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898060
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Falde
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 5:19 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] R2 In-Place Upgrade bug ?
I would definitely get
Joe,
isn't the below kind of like yelling, "OMG! Elvis!" in a McDonald's restaurant
in Kalamazoo and following it up with, "nobody ask for his
autograph"?
;-)
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Monday, July 31, 2006 3:13 PMTo:
Is it
possible to change who can create and/or edit GPOs? Sure. Will what you propose
accomplish what you want it to? Nope. Your Domain Admins can just put themselves
into the GP Creator Owners group, for example. Or in the root domain, they could
put themselves into the Enterprise Admins
At the bottom of every single message sent to this list, you'll see the
following link:
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
...which brings you to this:
The list provides a discussion forum for those wishing to discuss aspects of
Microsoft's Active Directory. It is intended for
That
would depend upon whether or not the domains are appearing because of metadata,
or whether they're appearing because of "bad" browsing information. Do the
domains appear anywhere besides Network Neighborhood? Is WINS in use? If so, are
there entries in WINS representing the domains?
If by
"loading", you mean applying the settings, yes, there are things in AD/GP that
would affect workstation application of policies, including ACLs on the
policies, OU structures, use of blocking and application of loopback
processing.
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Misconfigured scopes.
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:24 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Computer bootup speeds
Here's a thought -
Read
the last line of the original post.
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
DesmondSent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 12:38 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003
R2 Issue
Hes
trying to read a
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003 R2 Issue
But aren't we assuming that the permissions on that other
exchange server where it does work are default?
Laura A. Robinson wrote:
Read the last line of the original post.
Laura
I
don't know; that's why I pointed it out. Obviously, it's readable. The question
is, why is it readable on a Win2K3 machine, but not on a Win2K3 R2 machine? In
order to figure that out, we need the information that Al asked
for.
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Which
is why I say we need the information that Al has asked for.
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
DesmondSent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 2:18 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003
R2 Issue
It's
part of SFU (now in R2), but if you just want a downloadable grep for Windows,
you could try http://www.wingrep.com
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WATSON,
BENSent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:28 AMTo:
Windows 2000 RTM, by default, does not perform CRL checking; XP and 2003 do.
However, there are behavior variances on an application-by-application
basis. For more information:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/topics/cryptographyetc/tshtcrl.msp
x#ES3AE
Laura
-Original
Create
a restricted groups policy and link it to the OU in question.
http://support.microsoft.com/Default.aspx?kbid=279301
http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/Using-Restricted-Groups.html
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tareq
Intervals vary by company, domain structure, network topology and latency
tolerances. That said, there is nothing inherently wrong with the replication
parameters you list below. Are they the best parameters for your environment?
That depends. Is this a Windows 2000 environment? Is automatic
bandwidth site in
question only has one replication partner, yet we see connections to it from
a large number of our DCs on a regular basis. Is this normal?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:12 AM
To: ActiveDir
Is it
a GC? If so, then yes, that's to be expected. You may have *thought* that you
gave it only one replication partner, but if you're seeing additional connection
objects, then it has more than one replication partner. When planning
replication, you must be aware of every partition that
No.
GCs can replicate partitions thatthey don't own to other GCs. They can't
replicate them to DCs for the domains in question, but they *can* replicate
their read-only partitions to other GCs.
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
As a
side note to the other discussions, you do not need to set minPwdLength *and*
uASCompat. minPwdLength is for a Win2K3 domain, and uASCompat is for a Windows
2000 domain. In Windows 2000, you can also just directly edit the GP template
(.adm).
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, has anybody considered the possibility that this was an accident? I
know I've accidentally sent mail to the wrong addresses before by letting
autofill kick in an not paying attention to what actually got autofilled,
and this seems like a very strange thing to send to this list intentionally.
://www.akomolafe.com
www.akomolafe.com - we know IT -5.75, -3.23 Do you now
realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Sun 9/3/2006 5:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE
Oh, and: http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19970731
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 3:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Completely OT
Has anybody figured out what's causing the blank posts, or is it just me who
got blank replies from Mark and Neil?
Thanks,
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:15 AM
To:
Are they using NOTES - - I find that happens in list
environments a lot when the sender is using NOTES
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:06 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject
Given
that the culprit hasn't received any of the "backlash", my guess is that it was
still an accident. Can't anybody just cut the guy some slack?
Yeesh.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
CerinoSent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:20 AMTo:
Impossible/irrelevant.If it's a domain account, the policy applies
regardless, because the account is stored in AD. If it's a local account, then
the policy doesn't apply regardless; domain account policies don't apply to
local accounts. Is this a local account or a domain account?
Laura
What
do you mean by "being used"? Are you referring to it being in resource ACLs?
Nested into other groups?
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Figueroa,
JohnnySent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:44 PMTo:
.
The userAccountControl attribute of the user object was set to 512(not
that i'm certain if setting the passwd_notreqd overrides the DDP).
The domain/forest is at w2k3 FL.
Thanks
On 9/6/06, Laura A.
Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Impossible/irrelevant.If it's
While that's an interesting approach, unless this is a very small environment
(as in, there's no help desk that's going to be baffled by the screaming and no
multi-gazillionaire CXOs who are going to be doing the screaming), that might
not be such a good idea. ;-)
Laura
-Original
Ouch.
How large an environment are we talking about? You could use something like
DumpSec to list the DACLs and SACLs (and it's important to list the SACLs,
because the group could be being used for auditing purposes as well as
permissions granting) and could then parse the output, but
is at w2k3 FL.
Thanks
On 9/6/06, Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Impossible/irrelevant. If it's a domain account, the policy applies
regardless, because the account is stored in AD. If it's a
local account,
then the policy doesn't apply regardless; domain account
There
are lots of utilities to report ACLs. The issue is, depending upon the size of
the environment, this could be a lot of work that may not be worth it, depending
on how badly the OP wants to know if the group is being used
anywhere.
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or use smartcards.
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 6:35 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Separate Administrator password policy
Why not
confirmed.
The userAccountControl attribute of the user object
was set to 512(not that i'm certain if setting the passwd_notreqd overrides
the DDP).
The domain/forest is at w2k3
FL.
Thanks
On 9/6/06, Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL
To: ActiveDir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Is a Global Security group being used?
The question was a way - not the best way. This method
was actually suggested by MS at TechED one year, so I am not
totally insane.
-Original Message-
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 06 Sep
Can
you elaborate? What do you mean by "protected groups", and how did modifying the
membership of the Print Operators group cause you grief?
Thanks!
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek
HarrisSent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 12:36
The
process is nothing like that.There's a lot of hyperbole around this whole thing,
IMO. It's really not as onerus as many of these speculative articles would have
people believe. Seriously, folks, dig a little and you'll find things like this:
Oh,
one other thing- it most certainly *is* companies with 1000+ workstations who
are exceeding their license purchases. They're typically not doing it
intentionally, but they're most certainly doing it. (Of course, not *all*
companies of any particular size do it, but there are far more
Off-topic.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Daniel Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:14 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] what is the meaning of OT in front
of the subject
Off Track?
Funnily enough, there's a wiki entry about this... :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Introduction
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:08 AM
To:
999,998 + 2 = 1,000,000, not 100,000. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Nims
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: wikis
It's funny how we quote wikis as
1.
Check the owner of the files
2. You
may want to look at FSRMin Win2K3 R2; it allows you to restrict creation
of files based on type, among other things.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/R2/storage/default.mspx
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:55 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: wikis
999,998 + 2 = 1,000,000, not 100,000. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Okay,
then I'd recommend item #2 in my last response- rather than spending a bunch of
time trying to figure out who's doing it (which could be multiple people), why
not just prevent it in the first place? :-)
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J
Okay,
this is now my third time recommending FSRM in response to this query; are my
replies not getting through to the list? *Seriously*, just address the
issueby using FSRM and not allowing .mp3 files to be saved on the server
in the first place. If anybody complains, you'll have your
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:55 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: wikis
999,998 + 2 = 1,000,000, not 100,000. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
AAARGH! TEN types! TEN!
I need a nap.
_
From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:34 PM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MORE OT OT: wikis
There are two types of people in the world- those who understand binary
TRIPLE AAARGH!!!
10! 10!
I give up; I'm dain bramaged today.
_
From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:34 PM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MORE OT OT: wikis
There are two types of people in the world
You either need to allow the dynamic updates or create the DC's records
manually. Do the records need to be created in the zones for the server to
be reachable? Yes. Do you have to allow dynamic updates in order to create
them? No. One way or another, however, you need to get the records created,
Correct. There is no requirement to implement an additional server for
licensing purposes, and it is noted throughout the documentation that there is
no such requirement.
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
DesmondSent: Sunday, October
Only
for you... ;-)
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
DesmondSent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 5:40 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: A short
and sweet KB
It
appears to have disappeared?
There's a problem with this idea- the UPN (or, more specifically, the
portion before the @) does not necessarily match the CN component of a DN,
so there would be no reliability in your approach.
Why are you unable to retrieve DNs?
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whoops, I forgot to also add that because local group SIDs count towards
the limit, you will not experience "can't log on, period". Rather, you may be
able to log on to machines that aren't adding enough local group SIDs to your
access token to exceed the ~1015 group limit if you are a
Yes. You can even install SBS into an existing AD environment and it will
automatically join the existing Exchange organization, if one exists.
That's about the extent of my SBS knowledge, though, so you may want to wait
until Susan replies before taking my word on it. :-)
Laura
-Original
I've been noticing the latency for some time.
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:09 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Latency in List
I initially sent a
"
Toolkit Components:The toolkit contains two
components:
An executable blocker script
A Group Policy Administrative Template (.ADM file)
Blocker
ScriptThe script creates a registry key and sets the associated
value to block or unblock (depending on the command-line option used)
Does
he have a lot of compressed (not zipped; compressed viaNTFS)files in
the directory?
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Antonio
ArandaSent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 3:55 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] quota
I'm
very confused (haven't had a lot of coffee today)...
Is the
laptop a member of the domain? How are you changing the password? What exactly
isn't working? You should be able to simply press CTRL + ALT + DEL and change
the password just as you would if you were connected to the network
Is
there anything that prevents the users from logging on via PPTP when they want
to change their passwords?
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
HogenauerSent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:46 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
I'd probably take a look at conditional forwarding and/or stub zones instead
of doing Win2K-style secondaries. What version of BIND is in use in the
other forest? BIND 8+ supports conditional forwarding, and BIND 9+ supports
stub zones, IIRC.
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/358c7852-d23b-4668-ad
f5-6ad2fe001e9f1033.mspx?mfr=true
Sorry, probably should have dug up the link before sending my other
response. :-)
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Not at all. Both BIND and MS DNS support conditional forwarding (depending
on BIND version and OS version, respectively). The destination for the
conditional forwarding is irrelevant, since it's the servers receiving the
queries from the clients that are responsible for forwarding (or not) the
There seems to be a bit of confusion on a couple of fronts.
First, neither stub zones nor conditional forwarding are dependent on the
destination (e.g., external forest/external environment) DNS
implementation. DNS servers respond to queries; that is what DNS does, no
matter what version or
What's the boot order in the BIOS on those machines?
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Albert Duro
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 10:54 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
Ah,
Anderson
IT Guy
Kent Sporting Goods
433 Park Ave. S
New London OH 44851
419-929-7021 x315
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 10:52 AM
To: ActiveDir
nslookup
set type=A
192.168.1.15
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael B Allen
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:15 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Reverse DNS Lookup?
Can someone tell me how to do a
Works fine on my Windows machines.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael B Allen
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reverse DNS Lookup?
the restart procedure to say 'Power off the USB
drive before the system restarts.'
Bob
IT Guy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:41 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
and not the other way around.
I have since update the restart procedure to say 'Power
off the USB
drive before the system restarts.'
Bob
IT Guy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Friday
Used
for what?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
DesmondSent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 4:31 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Subnet Object
Question
Well yes, but Im
wondering which one is the actual
: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
That's a great revelation. Thank you. I'll try it
first thing in
the
morning.
- Original Message -
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent
Susan, two questions-
1. Why are you now going by Patrick?
2. Do you plan to identify the event of which you write below for those who
may not know?
:-)
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS
.. what options do
you see there?
Laura A. Robinson wrote:
And have you tried booting the server with the USB
drive formatted
as a
system drive? So far, your original statement has not
been proven,
and if
the server boots properly with that USB drive formatted
in a bootable
for the women's restroom, whether or not Mountain Dew
was readily available and what not... ;-)
Now I did google for the PGE links
Laura A. Robinson wrote:
Susan, two questions-
1. Why are you now going by Patrick?
2. Do you plan to identify the event of which you write below
Okay, maybe my sense of humor is a little skewed. :-P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:48 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT for those
You
may doubt it, but I don't. It's a moniker that implies (aside from childishness
on the part of the person who uses it) that Microsoft is a company that is all
about corporate greed. That's an unfair characterization and IMO, is insulting
to the 75%+ of Microsoft employees who spend a
That's the secret share we use for the man. It's where we keep the
collective intelligence that allows us to represent our single self as
multiple entities.
Laura
I am Dsylexia of Borg. Your a$$ will be laminated.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 5:24
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] OT: M$
it's friday, can't we all just get along?
--
Original message -- From: "Laura A. Robinson"
Clearly there are differing opinions about whether it's merely "slang" or
whether it's an inappropriate slur. Simpler just not to use it, don't you think?
I mean, I don't refer to the USAF as the "useless air farce" and expect its
members to think that's funny.
I
don't take offense when
There's a reason for the "OT" portion of the subject line, you know.
;-)
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
RutherfordSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:42 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
M$
Exactly. M$ just isn't funny. Borg, kool-aid, those are funny. M$ isn't.
Go figure.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta,
Nathaniel V CTR USAF NASIC/SCNASent: Monday, November 13, 2006 7:46
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
Disclaimer #1: "You" in the below refers to a generic "you", not a
specific person.
Disclaimer #2: My opinions are in no way intended to represent those of
my employer. They're my own, and they were my opinions long before I became a
Microsoft employee.
That
said...
You
know what I find
Darren is correct. A quick and simple test- create the following policy and
link it to an OU where you've placed a test user account:
1. User Configuration\Administrative Templates\Start Menu and Taskbar\Remove
Documents menu from Start menu- set to enabled
2. Run gpupdate if you're logged on
That's not entirely accurate, which may be why you see it not working as
advertised. :-)
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/71e76587-28f4-4272-a3
d7-7f44ca50c0181033.mspx?mfr=true
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott,
I may have missed it if somebody already posted this, but Windows PowerShell
is now available for download:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=10ee29af-7c3a-4057-
8367-c9c1dab6e2bfDisplayLang=en
Enjoy!
Laura
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ
Is this the same set of machines that are being talked about in the strange
DC error thread? I don't remember who it was who originated that one and I
want to make sure I'm not asking for something you've already provided.
So, if the answer to the above is no, my next question is, can you
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
