On Sun, 21 May 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
//
ID: 7855
Title: Limited Agencies
Adoption Index: 1.0
Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Co-author(s):
{{{
In rule 2467 replace:
{{{
An Agency is a document empower
On Sun, 21 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I hereby initiate a Victory Election with all players or announced
non-players as valid options and the Herald as the vote collector. I would
be in favor of all watchers (Ørjan and others) and G. putting emselves into
the race. The ball
On Sun, 21 May 2017, Quazie wrote:
Proposal "emPHAsis" AI = 1 (Very Trivial)
{{{
In rule 2327 replace:
{{{
are encouraged to
}}}
with:
{{{
are ENCOURAGED to
}}}
}}}
I'm not sure this is really Very Trivial - the capitalized terms have more
formal meanings, even if in this case ne
On Sat, 20 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Will any watcher wishing to be added to or remain on the Registrar's report
please reply in a timely manner?
Boo!
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 20 May 2017, Quazie wrote:
I CFJ on the following Two Linked Statements:
It is possible to create an agency such that its acronym contains at least
one integer symbol (e.g. 0-9).
It is possible to create an agency such that its acronym contains at least
one non-english alphabetic charact
On Fri, 19 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
The rules specify that a game message may be spread across multiple
email messages as long as it is clear how they are joined together,
which makes me think there is no mailing list threshold requirement.
Where is that? My reading of the current rule
On Fri, 19 May 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 18:13 +, Quazie wrote:
Proto-Proposal: This time to a public forum
Create a new rule, power .5 entitled "Traveling Message Infraction" with
the following text:
{{{
Players SHOULD NOT muddy up the waters by sending messages first t
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Quazie wrote:
I proto-submit the following proto-proposal entitled "Shiny Releveling
Event" AI=2
Update the text of rule 2487 to be the following.
{{{
The Supply Level is 1000. When Shiny Releveling event occurs, Agora's
Missing "a".
Balance is increased or decreased suc
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Watchers confirmed as of Sep 2016:
Nickname Contact
---
Ørjan oerjan at nvg.ntnu.no
Another Unicode error.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Tue, 16 May 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
I've long thought that if an action has a sufficiently well-defined
format, we should define a machine-readable format for it and have that
action taken by posting that machine-readable string to a PF, rather
than by announcement; this is mostly to make it
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM Quazie wrote:
the referee's quota, and if an officer receives some number N `Report
Cards' - 8 perhaps - then any player may oust the current officer
from their position.
Any player already can do that, by deputising for the office.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Let me make sure I understand the intent: if this only defined a switch,
then proposals of AI=1 could adjust it. Because it’s in a rule with P=3,
only proposals with AI=3 or higher can adjust the switch, and only if
they also adjust the rule text?
I
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
So R100 is the lowest number never used, and if this whole discussion
doesn't make the assignment too ambiguous to happen, that's where
this would end up when first triggered.
This seems to confuse lowest and highest.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016, nichdel wrote:
Final quorum: 0
I think this should be 2.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Recent events (all times UTC)
Sat 28 Nov 21:20:33 The Agoran Credit Union created
Sat 28 Nov 22:10:45 The Agoran Betting Market created
Sun 6 Dec 17:49:44 The Agoran Credit Union charter amended
Mon 21 Dec 18:01:09 The Agoran Betting Market charter
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, nichdel wrote:
I submit the following proposal (I'll pend in a couple days after a
feedback period):
Title: Simple Economics
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: nichdel
Co-author(s): G.
Any player MAY pay Agora, any other player, or any organization
any amount by anno
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, ais523 wrote:
It's probably simplest to define like this: "Repeatedly eliminate the
player with the fewest first-choice votes until someone wins. Votes for
eliminated players don't count (thus potentially promoting someone else
to hold the first-choice position)."
Set of pl
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 22:02 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, 13:41 Luis Ressel wrote:
Congrats to our new Promotor! I'm glad something is interested in
taking this over after almost two years. If you've got any
questions about your new job, fe
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Nicholas Evans wrote:
Fair point. I encourage any current watchers to reply to this thread, and
I'll add you to the list.
I guess I'm watching...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
One of the interesting aspects of the old currency system (not mentioned
in my proto- thesis) was that we had a strong precedent/rules (can't
remember how much was rules versus precedent) that we were using very
Classical math in that that currencies were
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
Elder Lurker is in fact a held and official Patent Title.
Probably a title Chuck should get after chiming in on Fri :_)
*Feels slightly miffed*
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, David Nicol wrote:
Daydreaming here about trying to leverage my involvement with this
game (since its inception!) into a non-frivolous claim that I am "a
member in good standing" of something. Am I still a registered
Watcher?
You are still listed as one in the Registrar's
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Jack Henahan wrote:
I believe cygneus is an adjective meaning "swan-like". Cantus Cygnei,
then, would be "Song of the swan-like things",
It would mean "swan-like songs", surely? There is no genitive there,
unlike with "cygni". (That would be "Cantus Cygneorum", perhaps.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, nichdel wrote:
* Publishing Cantus Cygni and Writs of FAGE as described in
Rule 1789.
I believe that the correct plural of "Cantus Cygneus" is "Cantus Cygnei":
http://www.online-latin-dictionary.com/latin-dictionary-flexion.php?lemma=CANTUS200
http://www.onl
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
First, this system hit a real sweet spot in decision and contestable
"exciting" points. Grind with Stems, make strategic decisions with
Roles, play them out with the other currencies. Offices with "power"
to set policies that had gameplay impacts. Winni
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I think, actually, we should move to a model where what the recordkeepor
does is enter Events (into whatever system is designed) and then reports
are auto-generated.
Before you go much further with this kind of thinking, I'd like to remind
people of the
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Luis Ressel wrote:
Whoops, I probably should've read agora-discussion before distributing
the proposals. Sorry!
You know, once upon a time we used to keep the (informal) proto-proposal
stage separate from actually proposing. Just saying.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Gaelan Bright Steele wrote:
I vote for myself.
Your message appears to have no plain text version. This is abominable
HTH.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Alex Smith wrote:
Ugh. Is Received: enough to tell which list the message was actually
sent via? Or do we have to check the list archives for every single
message to make sure it was actually sent?
Yes, although Sender: and Delivered-To: look easier. Although if it's a
_r
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Alex Smith wrote:
I actually got two objection emails from Gaelan and they both went to
a-d.
Actually not, the last one just has a deceptive To: header.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Copy-paste from here:
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/rkeep/current_slr.txt
Rule 1688/7 (Power=3)
The Power of an entity is a non-negative rational number. An
("T" is under the 6).
From here:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: AI Fix (AI=3)
{{{
Amend the first paragraph of Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption
Indices) to read:
Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran
decisions and proposals, whose value is an integral
multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9, de
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
I was about to quibble with the logic (but not the tally) because given the
unconditional votes listed, the outcome of aranea's vote does not depend on
what omd votes. However because of the q
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
To resolve the conditional votes, I observe that
a) aranea's vote does potentially depend on omd's, so I do not
consider it in resolving the conditional
b) therefore, omd's vote resolves to Revised Province of Agora
c) therefore, aranea's vote resolves to Rib
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
In interpreting the functioning of assets, assets should generally
be assumed to be indivisible physical objects in the possession of
their owners, and that transfers between owners are "in person".
Given that the common sense meanin
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Also add Joe Piercy and aranea to "without" column. And confirming no
overly-clever Distributor slipped it into the raw headers ;). -G.
Do you really need special list admin powers for that? Testing...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, omd wrote:
(d) If the valid options are ordered lists of preferences, the
outcome is decided using instant-runoff voting. In case of
a tie at any stage during the instant runoff, the vote
collector CAN and must, in the announcement of the
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Gaelan Steele wrote:
I’ll admit I’m not quite sure what this proposal does, other than
re-title the proposal. Does it do anything else?
It fixes a technical bug that made retitling not actually work.
Basically, amending is defined in Rule 105 as a separate class of Rule
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Gaelan Steele wrote:
I think it’s time we allow HTML reports. I submit this proposal:
Argh, please don't. Since I access my old NVG account only through ssh, I
use a terminal-based mail reader (alpine), and although it tries to
display HTML, it does not treat all HTML t
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Chuck Carroll wrote:
Greetings and felicitations to all Agorans, past and present, and a happy
22nd birthday to Agora! Long may she live!
Happy birthday!
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 29 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
I endorse aranea.
--
ais523
who has a feeling that this doesn't actually work
Are you referring to endorsing for support/objection (which doesn't seem
to be an Agoran decision and so wouldn't be covered by 2127), or do you
think there's some bug with 6
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Luis Ressel wrote:
--
The Herald is authorized to award aranea the Patent Title of Champion.
--
Silly idea: That the Herald instead use Rule 649 to award aranea the
Patent Title of Unchampioned.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
7733* Murphy 1.0 Sincere flattery
You stole that idea off BlogNomic, didn't you?
Oh, that explains the strange title.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
comes up with a mapping from random results to answers (although this
can't be done as ranges, e.g. if you want a 75% probability, you need
not just "1-3: yes, 4: no" and "1: no, 2-4: yes" but also "1, 2, 4: yes,
3: no" and "1, 3, 4: yes, 2: no"), and then
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, omd wrote:
Amend Rule 2440 (Word Cards) by replacing "sequence of English letters
and punctuation, but not whitespace" with "sequence of English letters
and/or numbers".
Don't you mean "digits"?
Cackling evilly,
Ørjan.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 13 November 2014 09:53, omd wrote:
- List of words: curl http://agora.qoid.us/current_slr.txt | egrep '^
' | egrep -o '[^ ]+'
This gives all words in the SLR, which includes rule titles,
boilerplate text etc, i.e. not only the rule bodies.
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, omd wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
7723 Henri 1.0 Single line feed
AGAINST.
I'm shocked you'd vote AGAINST. I can't even find a *hypothetical*
problem with any of the changes being proposed.
What? _All_ of the changes have obvious di
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014, omd wrote:
*7698 1 ais523 Ribbons 2014
x7699 3 scshunt Immutability
*7700 1 Henri Office Salary
*7701 1 Henri Credits
x7702 1 Henri Minister for Social Stratification
*7703 1 G. hard reset
*7704 1 G. Fixes the Oxford
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, omd wrote:
By the way, it was pointed out that this violates the recently
arguably reestablished custom of installing an officer, so I probably
should have changed it. But in any case, I volunteer to recordkeep
this, and since I'm pretty sure King Azaz cannot even theoretic
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
The Rulekeepor, Speaker and Prime Minister each have a
spending power of 2. The Promotor has a spending power of
4.
Changes to imminence and spending power both are secured.
Set the spending power of the Promotor to 3.
Are these
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 22:23 -0400, omd wrote:
[...]
7700 1 Henri Office Salary
AGAINST; we've attempted this sort of rule quite a lot, and it's never
been worth the recordkeepor issue
[...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
As I said, that's the dominant opinion right now.
It *wasn't* the opinion of the game circa 2001, and it worked fine.
In fact, it was the most traded section of the economy.
Idea: Make the reward for having a proposal distributed something you need
for
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
My current opinion on that proposal is: a) omd does not currently know
of a way to scam it; b) omd thinks the proposal is genuinely good for
the game; and c) omd will nonetheless probably come up with some way to
scam it later on.
I suddenly got this stra
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
oh crap I think I miswrote/remembered/pasted a date.
was just coming to resolve, thought I had a few hours,
but may be too late. really. you won't believe me
but really. crap.
I find it somehow appropriate that you posted this just as we Europeans
a
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Eritivus wrote:
I guess the power of rules enacted by illicit fast track ratification
actually can't be more than 3, since the fast track rule has power 3?
So not as worrisome as I thought.
If you want to make higher-powered rules
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
--
PROPOSAL: Credits
Replace every instance of the word "points" in the ruleset
excluding the instances of the word "points" in Rule 1023 (Com
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, omd wrote:
Referee was vacant.
Oops, forgot about that part of ais523's scam.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, omd wrote:
Meh... I deputise for Referee to award aranea a Yellow Card, as this
report, while justifiable (and apparently partially my fault? I don't
remember the context - I thought I calculated it accurately after my
correction), is against the rules.
Then I resign Refere
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
NOW TAKING BETS for GNP for the Week of 2014-10-13!
- BET up to 100 Florins per week by private message to me, or via
discussion forum. BETTING CLOSES 24 hours before end of week.
Heh heh heh...
- ODDS PAYOFF BELOW. Bookie's purse is infinite.
-
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
why isn't it "officeholdor", come to think of it?
*Grumble* the -or suffix used to only apply to -keepor, *Grumble*
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh, if all this failed because I didn't assign a CFJ #, I do it again
while assigning it CFJ#3423 at the appropriate juncture. -G.
AFAICT CFJ numbers have no official status whatsoever.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
CFJ 3419 (scshunt): "If Rule 1789 were repealed, the obligation on the
Registrar to note the method of deregistration of players deregistered
by Writ of FAGE would remain."
is hereby assigned to Henri.
And I'd have thought that would go to Murphy again?
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
3418 (Henri): "Midnight Monday is defined as 24:00."
is hereby assigned to Murphy.
Hm by my reading of the dice server reply that should have been assigned
to scshunt, why wasn't it?
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote:
So will I.
-scshunt
Replying without quoting at all is rather annoying, especially when
messages are coming in a day late in random order...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
Oh wait. "publishing" implies a Public Forum, not Discussion.
Which means scshunt is also in the clear.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
I am not sure that top posting your signature is legal.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Sean Hunt wrote:
I'd take this
I am not sure that top posting your signature is legal.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Sean Hunt wrote:
I'd take this case.
-scshunt
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, omd wrote:
I deputise for the Referee to award a Red Card to Henri for publishing
a Registrar's Report without signing eir name at the en
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, omd wrote:
I apologize for, like, the fifth time for the downtime, and hope that
this time it's actually fixed rather than about to break again as
soon as I look the other way.
APOLOGY ACCEPTED
(Also, testing)
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Fool wrote in a surprisingly non-foolish judgement:
It's too bad prop 7657 could not have resolved first, but, time is
running out and, as per H. Assessor, you guys are lame. Now Sean was
of course legally required to insult you. I, on the other hand, am
insulting you pro bo
On Sat, 24 May 2014, x1122334455 wrote:
So what just happened?
You went way over time on delivering a judgement, so the Arbitor removed
you from the case and reassigned it to someone else.
By doing so, you have broken Rule 591.
From my brief search of the rules, there seems no longer to be
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
[added 'unconditional' because conditional voting makes this trivial]
I remove my proposal, Back to Basics, from the Pool.
I submit the following Proposal, Back to Basics, AI-1:
I'd imagine this sort of thing would be more interesting with secret
vote
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Amend the text in Rule 1769 (Holidays) reading:
The week that contains the beginning of Agora's Birthday,
together with the following week, are a Holiday.
to read:
The week that contains the beginning of Agora's Birthday,
togeth
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Sean Hunt wrote:
[This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
[Note that due to the changes in voting in Proposal 7629, I am
r
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote:
I apologize, what's going on? I'm new.
They're voting on a proposal for fixing a bug in one of the rules for how
to win the game, but they don't seem to agree that the new version is bug
free. :)
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On 4/22/14 at 1:10am, Pavitra wrot
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
I find people are normally more interested in charting round the current
rules for a scoring system, than trying to improve them. I guess from my
point of view, I'm in a pretty good position to win by exploiting the
current rules, so why would I want them t
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
I thought it was Swann (a bit hard to cross reference pseudonyms :P), but
anyhow the book I remember is
http://www.amazon.com/The-Omega-Game-Steven-Krane/dp/0886779073
Oh hm definitely Swann: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._Andrew_Swann
(BTW I
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
This is, in part, why the original Suberian ruleset made sure to specify that
the worst that could happen to you was leaving the game, because in nomic the
in-game and out-of-game are in a very different place than in traditional
games (didn't Vlad publish
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, omd wrote:
I'm somewhat skeptical of the word "organism".
If it has to be biological, then just say "human", there's no
guarantee hypothetical space aliens or AIs would be considered
organisms anyway. :)
[snip]
/me wonders whether speculating about Tines is too silly for
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
+ 9 2 2 1 0 i
(Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
score is 0+92210i.)
Opinions sought on game balance: should we implement omd's suggestion
of limiting huge jumps by allowing a
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
What's a new player's immediately previous magnitude?
Also, what is the precision of these random complex numbers, we probably
don't want the Herald to compute infinitely many digits...
Oh never mind, Rule 2419 answers both questi
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
RR1. In a timely fashion after this clause takes effect, the Herald CAN
and SHALL set each player's Score to a random complex number
with a magnitude of (100 plus eir immediately previous magnitude),
by announcement. In a timely fashion
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Geoff Schmidt wrote:
I would support this with:
s/a magnitude of 100/a magnitude equal to the magnitude of their previous
score plus 100/
I'll just point out that has ambiguous parsing.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to amend the OPERATIONS MANUAL by appending
the following, where [RR1..6] will be replaced with the sequence of six
lowest integers not already in use as clause numbers.
s/integers/positive integers/
RR1. In a timely fas
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014, Ed Murphy wrote:
Registrar's Report
I believe that _if_ you weren't a player when the election was resolved,
then the office immediately became vacant again.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Can't you forbid div/span formatting. Please.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
[Apologies for the formatting, my email is still somewhat wonky.]
Yes, leaving out the date of the quoted message is clearly evil.
That was what you meant, right? Since it was perfect in every other way.
Not a html tag in sight.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, omd wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Wow. Significant rules changes and a quite high voter count. I'm happy.
Indeed... a bold new era of cleaning up the mistakes we just put into place,
but at least it
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Not a big deal, not planned as a scheme to control current batch of
proposals, just a minor personal preference.
BTW with the current system it would seem to speed things up if you
distribute closer to the beginning of the week.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, 1 Jan 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote:
Is the ruleset on the berkeley website not updated regularly?:
https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/current_flr.txt
That's woggle's website. The last updates in that directory are from Sep
13, the same day he resigned Rulekeepor because of P
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 18 December 2013 06:36, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
If the Ant Farm Manifesto states that a player's (Agoran) score
would change, the Ant Farmer SHALL announce that change as soon
as possible
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
If the Ant Farm Manifesto states that a player's (Agoran) score
would change, the Ant Farmer SHALL announce that change as soon
as possible, and that announcement, if true, changes the player's
score as announced.
I get a bit nervous when
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
Med. Af. Syria, Carthage, Spain
Not sure how much historical accuracy you're going for here, but I think
historically Roman Africa contained and started with (defeated) Carthage.
I guess that was all the Republic had down there; Egypt didn't get
in
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
It shouldn't make scams easier unless there's widespread disinterest in
a distribution. In fact, the rule would provide an incentive to vote (so
as to prevent the following distribution being used for a voting scam).
I imagine it could scammably amplify b
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
Quorum for an Agoran Decision is equal to the number of currently active
players who voted on the most recently resolved Agoran Decision to adopt
a proposal, minus 3.
Determined at what time? The current Rule 879 depends on the definition of
eligible vot
inactive without
objection.
For this to work, players must not object to making others inactive, if
they don't know that the others are really going to play.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
I'm visually impaired thank you very much
On Dec 13, 2013 11:08
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
ok then this is me objecting to the whole darn prospect
Did you not read what I wrote, or are you just being a jerk?
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
even though my name is not on this list I also object we are still just
trying to get back up off the ground
I don't think that worked as you didn't post to a PF.
Which is just as well, as reducing Quorum down to the level of people who
are actually go
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Thelas Staloras wrote:
Clerk's Docket
Argh please use plain text at least for officers' reports.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, woggle wrote:
I do not believe I will have time in the next month to fulfill the
obligations created by Proposal 7599 for me to create two new formats of
the ruleset, both of which require substantial manual annotation.
Therefore, I resign Rulekeepor.
You'd think people
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
On another note, is there any reason why it wouldn't be democratizable
right now? We could try to democratize it again. (Also, do the voting
limits matter, given that nobody attempted to cast more than one vote?)
Note that giving no number is equivalent to
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Henri Bouchard wrote:
Is the Registrar's report weekly or monthly? It does not state in the
Ruleset whether it is weekly or monthly.
-Henri
From Rule 2143:
Any information defined by the rules as part of a person's
report, without specifying which one, is part
601 - 700 of 755 matches
Mail list logo
