OnChangeAjaxBehavior is only meant to be used with different TextFields,
use AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior instead.
Cheers,
Janne
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Vitek Tajzich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have RadioChoice component and CompoundPropertyModel.
>
> I've added OnChangeAjaxBehavior but whe
>
>
> [x] Yes release Apache Wicket 1.4 RC2
> [ ] No, don't release because
Done.
Br,
Janne
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Arnout Engelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd appreciate being added to wicket-stuff. My sourceforge account is
> 'raboofje'.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Arnout
>
>
>
> [x] release 1.4-m3
> [ ] don't release 1.4-m3
>
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just confirmed that watir sucks: it is IE/Windows only. This makes
> it unsuitable to use it inside my company where we value running build
> servers on linux. I'm working on OS X which makes building tests a
> disas
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree that practical examples on examples on each would be
> great! I should try to get around doing an example with
> jdave-wicket-selenium.
I committed some additions to jdave-wicket-selenium trunk last week
and I'
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [x] release wicket 1.3.4
> [ ] don't release wicket 1.3.4, because...
>
>
> [x] +1 Release Apache Wicket 1.4 Milestone 2
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because...
>
>
> [x] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
> [ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
>
>
Tell your clients Sun is EOLing 1.4..
Janne
Done.
Janne
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi to the wicket-stuff admins bunch,
>
> on behalf of Dan Walmsley, I'd like to ask for commit rights for him on
> wicket-stuff.
> He is especially interested in committing to the gmap2 project and I'd be
> ver
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Frank Bille wrote:
I think we should release 1.3.1 now, since there has been quite a few
serious fixes. I have time to build it tomorrow.
WDYT?
Frank
On Jan 20, 2008 7:42 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Can everybody please take a look at our
Could you file a bug in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
Thanks,
Janne
On Jan 22, 2008, at 9:30 PM, ckuehne wrote:
If I put the autocomplete field on a panel that is added and replaced
dynamically via ajax it does not work in
Internet Explorer (tested with ver. 7) anymore.
[x] Yes, this numbering scheme seems reasonable
[ ] No, I like what we have now because
On Oct 30, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Frank Bille wrote:
[ ] Create beta5 on Sunday
[x] Create rc1 on Sunday
[ ] Not yet!
On Oct 7, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Frank Bille wrote:
[x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4
[ ] Don't release, because...
On Sep 20, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
[x] 1) Merge now and accept the (small but
non-zero) chance of delaying 1.3 a bit.
[ ] 2) Delay portlets support until 1.4.
/Gwyn
On 12.9.2007, at 21.10, Orion Letizi wrote:
> I've started a list of possible Terracotta-related project ideas on
> the wiki. These projects are for people who want to work with
> Terracotta (e.g., for a graduation project), but don't necessarily
> want to hack on the core source code.
>
>
On 12.9.2007, at 21.10, Orion Letizi wrote:
> I've started a list of possible Terracotta-related project ideas on
> the wiki. These projects are for people who want to work with
> Terracotta (e.g., for a graduation project), but don't necessarily
> want to hack on the core source code.
>
>
On 5.9.2007, at 3.07, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
add Gerolf Seitz as committer
-igor
+1
+1
On Aug 15, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Johan Compagner wrote:
in that method we do now:
if (!getFlag(FLAG_RENDERING) && !getFlag
(FLAG_PREPARED_FOR_RENDER))
{
setFlag(FLAG_BEFORE_RENDERING_SUPER_CALL_VERIFIED, false);
onBeforeRender();
getApplica
On Jul 6, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
the new error reporting feature, that one that throws two
exceptions per
component, is really making development not enjoyable. it slows
down request
processing significantly and might give noobs the wrong impression.
it is
valuable informat
till claiming copy except for the comments. at least you
gave me that.
petty you fail to specify as I ask.
On 7/26/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I did not mean to criticise you in any way, but for sure there is a
quite a lot of duplicate code/functionality in both javas
uld you be a bit more specific please?
I thought I rewrote most of it. Perhaps I am mistaken.
Which part?
Best Wishes,
f(t)
On 7/25/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Hi,
It seems you have copy-pasted a quite bunch of code, and if you're
going to develop this further th
Hi,
It seems you have copy-pasted a quite bunch of code, and if you're
going to develop this further there is no point for me to try to
remove the code duplication and try to integrate the code with the
old autocomplete. Also, patches would be nicer.
Janne
On 25.7.2007, at 23.14, Francis
Hi,
Wicket pages are not stateless in a way they are for example in GWT
where whole page structure can be generated as a javascript and there
is no interaction with the server. That is currently out of scope of
Wicket.
However, Wicket supports stateless pages which do not create session
s
Wicket portlet support is highly experimental. You can check out the
current portlet support from here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.3-
portlet-support/
Janne
On Jul 9, 2007, at 6:21 AM, Dean Del Ponte wrote:
> I understand that wiki supports portlet dev
On Jun 26, 2007, at 1:11 PM, manunabble wrote:
Hi, Janne
In one of the PortletPages I have a scroll which on-selection-
changed should
update part of the page. This worked fine in web-app, but now in
portlet-app
fails for the following listeners-related-reason, it seems:
WicketMessage:
What the situation with wicket.util.concurrent? Can we remove this
comment from ApacheLicenceHeaderTest, since there is a comment in the
NOTICE file.
.
/*
* Needs to be resolved (rewritten
or NOTICE)
Hi,
It seems Form.appendDefaultButtonField now depends on ClientInfo
which have not been implemented for portlets. You might override
appendDefaultButtonField, or implement the ClientInfo for portlets
(see WebClientInfo). Patches are always welcome.
See the source for more information.
On 22.6.2007, at 16.53, manunabble wrote:
Why you have to implement a new PortletRequestCycle?
Because I do a custom-error-handling, as you can see in the following
fragment of the already-posted-snippet (onRuntimeException):
protected IRequestCycleFactory getDefaultRequestCycleFactory() {
Hi,
Why you have to implement a new PortletRequestCycle? Take a look at
PortletActionRequestCycle and PortletRenderRequestCycle, and the
default getDefaultRequestCycleFactory method from
PortletApplication. As you can access all the original portlet
Action/Render Request/Responses from t
Go ahead.
On 19.6.2007, at 20.16, Al Maw wrote:
As subject. See other thread for discussion.
[x] Yes, rename AjaxSubmitButton to AjaxButton, leaving behind a
@deprecated subclass for backwards-compatibility.
[ ] No, that's a crazy idea. We're frozen for 1.3.0 and this sort of
stuff sh
Hi,
Portlet support of the (discontinued) Wicket 2.0 was removed from 1.3
because nobody had time to maintain the code. You might try portlet
support from 1.2.x, or wait till the third generation of the portlet
support arrives.
Janne
On May 28, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Michal Palička wrote:
H
On 25.5.2007, at 14.57, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
[x] yes accept wicket-contrib-velocity
[ ] no, let's not accept wicket-contrib-velocity, because...
On 13.5.2007, at 18.26, Jonathan Locke wrote:
[x] I'm ready to freeze the codebase for RC bug fixing.
[ ] Hold your horses, we REALLY MUST (fill in the blank) __ first.
On 4.5.2007, at 14.23, Upayavira wrote:
So, do we want to propose graduation?
[x] Yes, propose Wicket for Graduation
[ ] No, Wicket is not ready to graduate
Please cast your votes.
Janne
On 20.4.2007, at 1.52, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
[x] Release wicket 1.2.6 regardless if these four issues are resolved
[ ] Release wicket 1.2.6 but I'll make sure these get fixed
[ ] Don't release wicket 1.2.6 until these four issues are resolved
On 19.4.2007, at 1.04, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by:
[x] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor
change)
Yeah, that's why I changed the subject..
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This is a known issue and does not hold back the release.
Martijn
On 3/28/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
>
> Other
Yup, that's why I changed the subject.
Janne
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This is a known issue and does not hold back the release.
Martijn
On 3/28/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
>
>
On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
Other than that, things I've checked are:
- Tests all pass.
Hmm. I tried to run the tests, and some of them are failing because
the outputted markup has attributes in wrong order. Tests pass ok
when I use JDK 1.5.0, but with 1.4.2 or 1
On 28.3.2007, at 2.23, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
[ x] Yes release the damned thing already
[ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
signs of wear
[ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
AutoComplete renderHead seems to be broken in wicket-1.x.
Matej, can you help with this..?
ERROR - WebRequestCycle- Only methods that can be called
on IHeaderResponse outside renderHead() are renderOnLoadJavascript
and renderOnDomReadyJavascript
wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Onl
+1
On 20.3.2007, at 18.56, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Like the subject says.
Martijn
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Umm.. You can't run the portlet examples without portlet container..
Now it seems you try to run them in Jetty..?
Janne
On 18.3.2007, at 0.39, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Switching to the PortletFilter removes the previous exception but now
gives me an AccessDenied page in the examples.
Perhaps
pages
?
Martijn
On 3/18/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Yeah, let's move the portlet support to the wicket-stuff or some
subproject in apache. I could finally fix the two known bugs, but
since I'm not really using portlet stuff in any real-world
application, the portle
Umm.. You can't run the portlet examples without portlet container.
Now it seems you try to run them in Jetty..?
Janne
On 18.3.2007, at 0.39, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Switching to the PortletFilter removes the previous exception but now
gives me an AccessDenied page in the examples.
Perhaps
+1
Yeah, let's move the portlet support to the wicket-stuff or some
subproject in apache. I could finally fix the two known bugs, but
since I'm not really using portlet stuff in any real-world
application, the portlet support would still be highly experimental/
incomplete.
Janne
On 18.
bang.
I think I've been missing long enough.. :-P
I'll check those portlet bugs..
Janne
On 20.2.2007, at 20.25, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
since janne is mia we need to once again decide on the future of
the portlet support. if we dont have a core committer who wants to
work on it and knows how
On 10/23/06, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 21, 2006, at 10:33 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> The continuum build on the servoy server still points to the sf.net
> repository. I don't seem to have karma for administering
continuum, so
> could someone
On Oct 21, 2006, at 10:33 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The continuum build on the servoy server still points to the sf.net
repository. I don't seem to have karma for administering continuum, so
could someone with the right amount of karma kick continuum in the
balls?
Martijn
Exit code 1 - ssh
On Oct 21, 2006, at 10:33 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The continuum build on the servoy server still points to the sf.net
repository. I don't seem to have karma for administering continuum, so
could someone with the right amount of karma kick continuum in the
balls?
Martijn
balls kicked.
Ja
Yes, this problem has something to do with datepicker doing header
contributions, I'll try to reproduce..
Janne
On Oct 4, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Manuel Barzi wrote:
> Watching the markup generated by the WebPage version, I find that
> Wicket does automatically inserts the following scripts to the
On Oct 3, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I ran the RAT tool from Apache on our distribution for 1.2.2, and it
came up with the following files that don't have an ASL header. I
haven't looked into it closely but I think we should clear these up.
These are from the main src directory,
This mail is originally from wicket-user, but I reply here to get
more attention.
This looks pretty elegant way to do the thing. Any objections before
I commit this into the trunk?
Janne
On Sep 23, 2006, at 4:50 PM, Joni Freeman wrote:
> Some months ago there were discussion about how to us
On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Ted Roeloffzen wrote:
> Some of you may know that we are trying to create a CMS or a least
> CMS-components with Wicket. When i looked at the Wicket-stuff site
> a saw that there is a project to integrate TinyMCE into Wicket. I
> was wondering if anyone knows h
On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Ted Roeloffzen wrote:
> Some of you may know that we are trying to create a CMS or a least
> CMS-components with Wicket. When i looked at the Wicket-stuff site
> a saw that there is a project to integrate TinyMCE into Wicket. I
> was wondering if anyone knows h
What version of Wicket are you using? There should work with the current version from svn? JanneOn 19.9.2006, at 13.08, Manuel Barzi wrote:Ok, checking the markup I can see - following the rules - shouldn't Iuse parent html element body, neither elements updwards (head, html,etc...). Wicket-portlet
On 13.9.2006, at 17.58, Manuel Barzi wrote:
> But, what about that webapp - based on WebPage - to be integrated in a
> portlet by means of PortletPage?
> I mean, does PortletPage offer the same flexibility WebPage does? I
> guess we'll find some limitations, have to test yet, but all
> informati
On 12.9.2006, at 19.03, Manuel Barzi wrote:
> When I try to use maven, I get the following error (and I have already
> setup the proxy as described in Wicket site):
>
> ---
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> [INFO]
> --
> --
Portlet support is still experimental, meaning there has not been real production class project based on it, but it is pretty much feature complete. There are some known features, and for sure some bugs left, but it mostly works.And yes, the examples project can be checked out from https://svn.sour
At least wicket-portlet-examples run fine with Liferay+Tomcat. What is this wicket-portlet-samples you're trying to deploy, and where did you get that portlet.war? If you compile the examples with maven it produces a war called "wicket-portlet-examples.war"."Exception: Error registering portlets fo
Offering a server is really nice, but as mentioned before we (wicket)
have our own dedicated server, and I would like to see all this
wicket stuff collected to there, opposed to the current situation
where everything is distributed into half dozen different servers..
Janne
On 6.9.2006, at
Ah, this must be same problem as this https://sourceforge.net/
tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=1547028&group_id=119783
I'll commit the fix in a second.
Janne
On 30.8.2006, at 21.13, samyem wrote:
>
> Also, I forgot to add that :
>
> src="/mm/app/resources/
> wicket.extensions.ajax.marku
On 26.8.2006, at 0.05, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> The kind of discussion that is appropriate here though is if people
> find features/ tricks/ whatever that might make Wicket better.
Just like what Howard has done? ;)
http://howardlewisship.com/blog/2006/08/tapestry-5-progress-class-
reloadin
gt; -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Janne
> Hietamäki
> Sendt: ma 28-08-2006 10:34
> Til: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management
>
>
>
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki Sent: 28. august 2006 10:06 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management Session cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the server side the default is 30 minutes. This can be
default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the wrong leg? .regards Nino From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki Sent: 28. august 2006 09:56 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management On 28.8.2006, at 10.53
On 28.8.2006, at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote: Hi I was wondering how wicket maintains it’s session state. We are currently working on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives within an Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id. As far as I can see wicket
Fixed, the packages should be updated shortly. I disabled the deployment when there was some network problems between the servers.JanneOn 28.8.2006, at 10.38, Igor Vaynberg wrote:yes, but the 2.0 builds havent been updated since aug 5th...janne, are you reading with us?-IgorOn 8/28/06, Frank Bille
On 25.8.2006, at 8.17, David Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently trying to build some Wicket based Portlets. The sample
> portlet provided works great. Now I'm trying to convert the sample
> TabbedPanel application found in wicket.example.compref into a
> PortletApplication.
>
> So far the ta
This is also fixed in the svn.
Janne
On 25.8.2006, at 19.59, V. Jenks wrote:
>
> I'm taking my first crack at using some of the built-in Ajax stuff
> in Wicket
> - pretty cool by the way!
>
> I'm using the AutoCompleteTextField to filter some data and it
> works except
> that I'm getting
On 25.8.2006, at 19.43, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
>> with the current architecture if you have a hundred clients doing
>> comet you
>> will have a hundred threads - not so good.
>
> Yeah. What do you think Lorin? Is there something we might have missed
> from e.g. DWR? An alternative for your us
On 25.8.2006, at 19.26, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> How about sunday?
>
> Martijn
Go ahead.
Janne
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technol
Hi,
IIRC, this has already been fixed in the svn.
Janne
On 25.8.2006, at 13.30, Konstantin wrote:
>
> Started using Wicket and found a problem ;-)
>
> To reproduce a bug:
> 1. Make a simple page with a form containing AutoCompleteTextField and
> IndicatingAjaxSubmitButton.
> 2. In a page-clas
On 23.8.2006, at 13.22, Janne Hietamäki wrote:
>
> On 23.8.2006, at 13.15, Steen Larsen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been trying out the portlet support in wicket, and have the
>> problem that when I press a button or link it seems like the
>> default
On 23.8.2006, at 13.15, Steen Larsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying out the portlet support in wicket, and have the
> problem that when I press a button or link it seems like the
> default "action" is called so that I never sees anything else than
> the first page. I have tried the por
On 21.8.2006, at 19.06, Eelco Hillenius wrote:[ x] Yes, let's go Apache[ ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternativesJanne-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done qu
+1 May be we should restructure wicket-stuff too?On 20.8.2006, at 16.15, Martijn Dashorst wrote:There has been some confusion on the branches and Wicket 1.xdevelopment. This document proposes a solution to this confusion, andasks for a vote on structure. But first a short analysis of theproblems at
You clearly had too much fun on your holiday.
To be a little less off-topic, could someone with ie7 test wicket
ajax examples, and update http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/
index.php/FAQs#Which_browsers_has_been_tested_with_Wicket_AJAX
On 19.8.2006, at 16.26, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I *lo
On 15.8.2006, at 0.49, Nathan Hamblen wrote:Voicetribe is in open beta. (Now you can finally figure out what it is.)http://www.voicetribe.com/Sign up for an account, pop in a DVD, and record something. Don't worry,you can't possibly say, "Testing, 1 ... 2 ... 3" any worse than I do.All the non-seri
Version 1.4 of javamail can be redistributed, the jars can be found from ibiblio's maven repository. javax.activation activation 1.1 jar compile
something like this added into your app servers server.policy should help:grant codeBase "file:/x/webapps/appl/WEB-INF/lib/wicket-1.2.jar" { permission java.lang.reflect.ReflectPermission "suppressAccessChecks";};Google for "server.policy" and "suppressAccessChecks"On 29.7.2006, at 16.56
On 29.7.2006, at 11.51, Eelco Hillenius wrote:So how do frameworks like Dojo and GWT do it? Do have back buttonsupport for Ajax...EelcoSome articles..http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2006/01/ajax-back-button.htmlhttp://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/10/26/ajax-handling-bookmarks-and-back-button.htmlh
On 26.7.2006, at 14.11, Matej Knopp wrote:We were hunting a bug with Johan, which turned out to be fact that AjaxRequestTarget.EncodingResponse is derived from Response instead of WebResponse.WebRequestCycle.getReponse casts the response to WebResponse, which means that all responses used in WebReq
Hi,Wicket's native portlet support is still a work in progress, but so far it works fine. So far I have only done some testing with it (see wicket-portlet-examples subproject), but I'm expecting to start a real world application based on it in a month or two. So far I have tested running the exampl
On 29.6.2006, at 14.00, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Everytime that happens, you'd rather kill your local repository and
> download from scratch... (make sure you make a backup of it before you
> do so)
The real problem I had is the cglib-nodep package provided by wicket-
spring conflicting with t
On 29.6.2006, at 13.34, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Log Message:
> ---
> set spring as a provided dependency
>
> Modified Paths:
> --
>branches/WICKET_1_2/wicket-spring/pom.xml
>branches/WICKET_1_2/wicket-spring-annot/pom.xml
>branches/WICKET_1_2/wicket-spring-annot-
On 26.6.2006, at 12.41, Ate Douma wrote:- you removed the web.xml from the portlet-samples, but you definitely do need it as it won't build otherwise, although it shouldn't contain a Pluto PortletServlet for sure.Yeah, I put the empty web.xml where it belongs.- I noticed you configure the Portlet
Hello everyone,I checked in the Wicket portlet (JSR-168) support into Wicket 1.2 branch. Comments and patches are welcome. Different portlet modes (EDIT,VIEW,HELP) are not yet supported, but coming soon. Also a portlet unit test tool, is coming up. The example project can be checked out from https:
On 14.6.2006, at 11.49, Nino Wael wrote:Hi GuysAnyone knows if theres a demo of the wicket.markup.html.tree component anywhere? See http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/nested Janne HietamäkiCemron Ltdhttp://www.cemron.fi ___
Wicket-user mailing
/ignore Janne HietamäkiCemron Ltdhttp://www.cemron.com/ ___
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
This patch https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684977&aid=1491547&group_id=119783 broke the functionality with IE in some cases. Fixed version can be found from svn for 1.2 and trunk. Please report if the problem persists.On 2.6.2006, at 0.44, nehe pradip wrote:Hi everybody, I have 2
nope, rc2 had my autocomplete implementation, but it seems someone broke it before final.i'll check it out.On 2.6.2006, at 6.08, Igor Vaynberg wrote:there seem to be some bugs in our implementation. in 1.2 rc2 i think autocomplete was working off capxious.com implementation, but its license is inco
On 26.4.2006, at 18.59, Igor Vaynberg wrote:Unless something changes - ie someone works on this hard and soon -, Idoubt we'll ever have portlet integration. Sorry to all the folks that have been waiting for this.I wouldnt say never. Just not until we have someone who wants to do it with time on the
_HU
lv_LV
no_NO
no_NO_NY
pl_PL
ru_RU
sk_SK
sv_SE
--
Janne Hietamäki
Cemron Ltd
http://www.cemron.fi/
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the l
tore has one side effect. That all back
button
clicks now will return to the server for that url.
I don't know if we want that by default for every wicket
application.
johan
--
Janne Hietamäki
Cemron Ltd
http://www.cemron.fi/
--
On Feb 17, 2006, at 3:33 AM, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one
pass (Wicket 2.0)
+1.
We are still forced to run Java 1.4, but I'm testing if
retrotranslator is stable enough for production.
--
Janne Hietamäki
Cemron Ltd
ction environments.
In most use cases it's really simpler to use https all the time and
not bounce between http and https.
It's ok to have these things configured somewhere, but I don't want
wicket to use absolute urls by default, it really brings more pain in
many cases.
Jeremy Hulick wrote:
Will the 1.2 release have jsr-168 portlet support? If not, when can we
expect that to happen? Thanks.
1.2 will not most probably have portlet support. Expect it to happen in
Wicket 2.0, which is arriving quite soon after 1.2. Or submit some code.
--
Janne Hietamäki
Cemron
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
