From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My initial reaction to the subject line:
No ***, Sherlock . . .
--Ronn! :)
What goes up, must come down. Long Live Compuserve :-)
JJ
(I miss my Sysop Flags)
_
Add photos to your
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/20/international/worldspecial/20WEAP.html?pagewanted=1th
exert:
In the fall, as the debate intensified over whether to have inspectors
return to Iraq, senior government officials continued to suggest that
the United States had new or better intelligence that
Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see our morals evolving before our very eyes, don't you?
Not really. Remember there is no purpose to evolution, it just is.
Isn't there at least one, however vaguely defined purpose to evolution:
At 12:42 AM 7/24/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
...
A lot of it probably has to do with collapse of an
ideology. September 11th was the deathknell of the
modern American left. It simply had no meaningful
response to the attack other than to suggest - either
openly or by
--- Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/20/international/worldspecial/20WEAP.html?pagewanted=1th
exert:
In the fall, as the debate intensified over whether to have inspectors
return to Iraq, senior government officials continued to suggest that
the
--- Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jose J. Ortiz-Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd hate to start a war of our own, but was this
*really* necessary?
Just pondering different points of view..
JJ
Your particular objection to what happened being?
What point of view
From: Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 06:15:17 -0400
At 12:42 AM 7/24/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
...
A lot of it probably
David Hobby
No, it doesn't. I read all three quotes as We will attack all of the
nasty weapons that Iraq has. If
wombats were credible WMD, he would have included them too. : )
They certainly are! You should see the holes they dig. :-)
They also love to leave their turds on the tee-markers
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:27:20PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
There are 2 kinds of bank account routing numbers: 1 for deposits, 1
for withdrawals. If you give them the routing number for depositing
stuff in your account, they ask for the *other* number. At least,
this is my
Gautam Mukunda
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But of course this statement was carefully crafted.
The CIA could not confirm the allegation so the
speech writers found language that the CIA could
live with. So this was not simply a statement of
fact. The speech writer came up with a phrase
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
But still your missing the point. I just can't see how an intelegant
person is hoodwinked by this rediculous propoganda.
Since we are being snippy...I just can't see how an intelligent person
could post writing like this. It would
At 12:52 AM 7/24/2003 -0400 Bryon Daly wrote:
For a statement that you think was so carefully crafted to shield the
administration from accusations of lies,
What's carefully crafted about The British have learned
JDG
___
John
At 12:42 AM 7/24/2003 -0400 David Hobby wrote:
Like it or not, if your policies make some people
angry enough to kill themselves to show their displeasure,
you need to rethink your policies.
I totally disagree. If your policies make evil men angry enough to kill
themselves, you are
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:27:44AM +1000, Russell Chapman wrote:
I don't understand this - every time I sell something on eBay I give
away my bank account info for them to put the funds into. How does the
bank account info help them?
When you say you give away your bank account info, what
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Gautam Mukunda
...
Taken advantage of by people more interested in
political power than the national interest.
This sounds to me about as rational as characterizing the right as people
more interested
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Kevin Tarr
...
You, sir, are an idiot.
I'm having a hard time seeing that sentence as anything other than a
personal attack. Please refrain from that sort of generalization.
Nick
Robert Seeberger wrote:
http://www.european-lotteries.org/pdf/dayzers_warning.pdf
The scams are getting deep these days
xponent
Da Winner Maru
rob
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
While I am sure that many of you will not support the first half of the proposed
ammendment, (although I would point out that this first half does not rule out civil
unions - such as the ones currently embraced by the gay community in Vermont.)
Nevertheless, I would hope that everyone would be
--- David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it did do a lot to cause the attack. And not
by harmlessly distributing Britney Spears videos,
either.
Some of being targeted was because America was
walking point
for the West in general. But the US has done a lot
of
selfish things
From: David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:42:47 -0400
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
...
A lot of it probably has to do with collapse of an
ideology.
--- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken advantage of by people more interested in
political power than the national interest.
This sounds to me about as rational as
characterizing the right as people
more interested in economic power than the national
interest.
Which is, of
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
snip
What George Bush understands - but what all the
so-called intellectuals who
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Gautam Mukunda
What's it's really about, though, is hate. Well, hate
and envy. A large portion of the world's left just
goes batshit crazy at the idea of George Bush. So
much so that no one, nothing, is more important
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The left is defunct only if we remain forever in a
state of total war. And
that's precisely why a vaguely defined, open-ended
war on terrorism that
suspends normal checks and balances for civil rights
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Gautam Mukunda
...
The Joint Chiefs could probably do a pretty good job
of it. They could do no worse than the people running
them now, certainly. But, Nick, the war against
terrorism is more
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like the mythical ostrich, I guess. As long as
the
Ignorance is strength huh? Ostriches are __NOT__
mythical.
True, but they don't stick their head in the sands.
It is the mythical ostrich that does that. Not the
real one.
=
Gautam Mukunda
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like the mythical ostrich, I guess. As long as
the
Ignorance is strength huh? Ostriches are __NOT__
mythical.
True, but they don't stick their head in the sands.
It is the mythical ostrich that does
From: Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But by your logic, shouldn't we therefore expect that the administration's
next target will be the Saudis? There's plenty of evidence that they have
harbored, supported and trained terrorists whose sole goal is American
genocide.
Why do you think we
-Original Message-
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 5:44 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Fw: Congratuations for winning our lottery
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:27:44AM +1000, Russell Chapman wrote:
I don't understand this - every time
From: Doug Pensinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/20/international/worldspecial/2
0WEAP.html?pagewanted=1th
To my mind, the most telling and eye-catching point in the
judgment of five of the six intelligence agencies was that if
left unchecked, Iraq would
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/24/opinion/24SAFI.html?ex=1059624000en=5fa
ea66331fcf207ei=5062partner=GOOGLE
Bush's Four Horsemen By WILLIAM SAFIRE
WASHINGTON
On the domestic front, President Bush is backing into a buzz saw.
The sleeper issue is media giantism. People are beginning to grasp
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
But still your missing the point. I just can't see how an intelegant
person is hoodwinked by this rediculous propoganda.
Since we are being snippy...I just can't see how an intelligent
David said:
If wombats were credible WMD, he would have included them too. : )
...thus giving me the chance to point out that I was responsible for:
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blosxom.cgi/2002/Oct/22#wombat
Rich
VFP A Colder War
___
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/24/technology/24VOTE.html?ex=1059710400en=
d989a69c518293a6ei=5062partner=GOOGLE
Computer Voting Is Open to Easy Fraud, Experts Say By JOHN SCHWARTZ
The software that runs many high-tech voting machines contains serious
flaws that would allow voters to cast extra
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brin-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Computer Voting Is Open to Easy Fraud, Experts Say
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:23:52 -0500
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/24/technology/24VOTE.html?ex=1059710400en=
At 07:26 2003-07-24 -0400, John D Giorgis posted a text containing the
following:
Gay marriage would cut the final cord that ties marriage to the well-being
of children. It is a step we should not take. Our cultural forgetting of
the meaning of marriage has already had too many sad consequences
Doug posted:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/20/international/worldspecial/2
0WEAP.html?pagewanted=1th
To my mind, the most telling and eye-catching point in the
judgment of five of the six intelligence agencies was that if
left unchecked, Iraq would most likely have a nuclear weapon in
Who said anything about restrictions? As far as spellcheckers, I
can't see how an intelligent person is hoodwinked by this ridiculous
propaganda.
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
David said:
If wombats were credible WMD, he would have included them too. : )
...thus giving me the chance to point out that I was responsible for:
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blosxom.cgi/2002/Oct/22#wombat
Rich
VFP A Colder War
I don't suppose4 you got a free copy of _Singularity Sky_
Brad said:
I don't suppose4 you got a free copy of _Singularity Sky_ out o fit,
did you?
No, alas not.
Rich
GCU One Line Reply
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
--- Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There *could* be a joke in there somewhere about
how illogical and irrational subjects aren't
inherently understandable, but I certainly won't
go searching for it.
Computer Voting Is Open to Easy Fraud, Experts Say By JOHN SCHWARTZ
No, it isn't. See the recent brazilian elections. Unfortunately,
it's not idiot-proof, and we keep electing jerks :-/
Alberto Monteiro
___
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
My initial reaction to the subject line:
No ***, Sherlock . . .
Then there's the paraphrase, Sure no, S***lock.
That acted almost like a little temporary emotional reset button on
someone who was in desperate need of one. I don't know how many times I
defused her
It shows the position of the Sun relative to the near
stars and then zooms out to the whole observable
Universe:
http://www.anzwers.org/free/universe/
Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Is anyone else having their list messages bounced back? Vey
frustrating!
I even tried to forward one to Nick and his address was bounced.
Jon
Le Blog: http://zarq.livejournal.com
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2
From: Nick Arnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How does this end? Can anyone offer a definition of the conditions
necessary for us to return to peacetime, or whatever one
might properly call 'normal' conditions?
It ends when the US has dominated all the other countries in the world, I
-Original Message-
I waited to allow someone else to come up with this one. We have no
scientific means to allow people to tell if they are
dreaming, even though
dreams have been studied for thousands of years. We have
means to see if
other people are dreaming, but we have no
- Original Message -
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: Science and knowledge
Dan Minette wrote:
I think the key to reconciling this with the general description of
physicists as
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who said anything about restrictions? As far as spellcheckers, I
can't see how an intelligent person is hoodwinked by this ridiculous
propaganda.
I do not hav ethe time, or fel that I should be expected to run everything
through a spell checker. If as
At 04:11 PM 7/24/03 -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
Is anyone else having their list messages bounced back? Vey frustrating!
I even tried to forward one to Nick and his address was bounced.
This one reached the list (obviously ;-) ) . . .
(I thought of offering to forward a message to Nick
At 02:50 PM 7/24/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
My initial reaction to the subject line:
No ***, Sherlock . . .
Then there's the paraphrase, Sure no, S***lock.
Or, No shirt, Shylock.
None Of Which Makes AOL Any Better Maru
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I
As far as it taking an inordinate amount of time to run an email through
a spellchecker, I can't see how an intelligent person is hoodwinked by
this ridiculous propaganda.
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Friday browncoat republicans in the house of
representatives called the
police to arrest and remove democratic
representatives from a library in
the house of representatives. The future is here
and now. Never before
has something so shocking
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Iraq's Nuclear Weapons - Clinton's '98 Statement Date: Thu,
24 Jul 2003 19:14:07 +0100David said: If wombats were credible
WMD, he would
I don't remember the original thread, but Ritu had
mentioned a study in which near-death experiences were
surveyed; here is one article about that:
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/DrJohnson/GMA020108Near_death_experiences.html
...The study reported in Lancet looked at 344
patients in the
Nevertheless, I would hope that everyone would be in favor of the second
half. I think that this issue is so important and controversial that it should
be decided by the State Legislatures and Congress, which are elected by the
people, and not written by unelected judges.
As will hardly
Send me the headers for something that bounced. Obviously, this message of
yours didn't.
--
Nick Arnett
Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jon Gabriel
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:12 PM
To:
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think that without serious citizen oversight,
the
Ashcroft Justice Dept. would (or will) make a
mockery
of the Constitution. If people don't make noise
about
it, we will lose some of our civil rights and
freedom
(some will say that we
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: How we were hoodwinked
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
But still your missing the point. I just can't
- Original Message -
From: Sonja van Baardwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Congratuations for winning our lottery
Robert Seeberger wrote:
http://www.european-lotteries.org/pdf/dayzers_warning.pdf
Erik Reuter wrote:
When you say you give away your bank account info, what exactly
are you talking about? (I don't mean post the numbers, I mean the
descriptive terms for what you give, like routing number, account
number, bank name, etc.)
All Australian banks have a code called the BSB code,
Ray Ludenia wrote:
David Hobby
No, it doesn't. I read all three quotes as We will attack all of the
nasty weapons that Iraq has. If
wombats were credible WMD, he would have included them too. : )
They certainly are! You should see the holes they dig. :-)
They also love to leave
Erik Reuter wrote:
Since we are being snippy...
rest snipped
;)
Julia
who *could* start getting snippy in the other sense, but it's just not
worth the energy today
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Friday browncoat republicans in the house of
representatives called the
police to arrest and remove democratic
representatives from a library in
the house of representatives. The future is here
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think that without serious citizen oversight,
the
Ashcroft Justice Dept. would (or will) make a
mockery
of the Constitution. If people don't make noise
about
it, we will lose some of our
Sonja van Baardwijk wrote:
http://www.european-lotteries.org/pdf/dayzers_warning.pdf
Interesting that the warning was posted in English first and Dutch
second - one assumes that the scam is aimed at those ignorant
Americans...;-)
Nice to see your virtual smile again Sonja!
Cheers
Russell
--- Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think that without serious citizen oversight,
the Ashcroft Justice Dept. would (or will) make a
mockery
of the Constitution. If people don't make noise
about it, we will lose some of our
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as it taking an inordinate amount of time to run an email through
a spellchecker, I can't see how an intelligent person is hoodwinked by
this ridiculous propaganda.
Now your just being a jerk.
On the off chance, let me explain:
Running a
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:49:58PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Since we are being snippy...
rest snipped
snip
(All this snipping is reminding me of the story about the 3 mythical
women who cut the strings of people's lives when their time is up)
--
Erik Reuter
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: The Case for a Marriage Ammendment to the Constitution
The family is not in any danger.
I differ with this statement. I think that the family is facing a number
of
As far as me being a jerk, I can't see how an intelligent person is
hoodwinked by this ridiculous propaganda.
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:53:48PM -0300, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
It shows the position of the Sun relative to the near
stars and then zooms out to the whole observable
Universe:
http://www.anzwers.org/free/universe/
Cool link! Thanks Alberto. I like the fully zoomed out view. Since it
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:34:18PM -0500, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Here is one for Outlook Express that is free, and works quite well.
I have been using it for a few months and it has actually helped me spell
better in the first place.
And here is a useful website (but of course for email use
What's carefully crafted about The British have learned
Suppose I say that `James has learned to drive'. If I then say, `he
drove into the ditch' you understand that I was being ironic about the
phrase `learned to drive'. This is because learning, in everyday use,
is not supposed
Like it or not, if your policies make some people angry enough
to kill themselves to show their displeasure, you need to rethink
your policies.
I totally disagree. If your policies make evil men angry enough
to kill themselves, you are very likely doing the right thing.
I
Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Seriously, if the admin actually was trying to craft a believable
lie that would not blow up in their faces, don't you think they'd
do a better job of it, and have all their ducks lined up, i's
dotted, t's crossed, etc.?
Please tell me why the
I'm going to focus on one answer that relates to a post of Doug for now.
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Morality is just self interest?
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at
- Original Message -
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:32 AM
Subject: Re: Religion based ethics
Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see our morals
And if you are interested in hearing about it, you can check out the story here:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/templar569/
I have to figure out how to shrink the pics we took, though. My wife uploaded them at
1.2 meg piece, and I have no idea how to make them smaller at this point.
Jim
I think statements indicating that the
administration is obviously telling the truth and
that anyone not agreeing this is either what?
stupid? venal? totally naive? totally cynical?
Taken advantage of by people more interested in
political power than the national interest.
Sol in
In a message dated 7/24/2003 8:34:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What's carefully crafted about The British have
learned
The White House wanted a stronger statement but the CIA experts would not appove it.
They tried several iterations before this was chosen
At 07:11 AM 7/23/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:16:20PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Sounds like they would fit Erik's conditions perfectly.
Nope.
Why not?
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the
From: Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to figure out how to shrink the pics we took, though. My wife
uploaded them at 1.2 meg piece, and I have no idea how to make them smaller
at this point.
There's a whole bunch of waysm depending on the software you have, but
probably the easiest, if
This is certainly one of the most amazing stories of the year - the
Governor of mighty California is going to face a recall election in late
Sept. or the first Tues. of Oct.The best opinion on this I have heard
is from a Democratic activist who pointed out how the combination of the
potency of
At 11:35 AM 7/24/2003 -0400 Jon Gabriel wrote:
But by your logic, shouldn't we therefore expect that the administration's
next target will be the Saudis? There's plenty of evidence that they have
harbored, supported and trained terrorists whose sole goal is American
genocide.
Why do you think
At 11:21 AM 7/24/2003 -0500 The Fool wrote:
It is merely a myth about ostriches. Your claim was that ostriches were
mythical, you did not mention any behavior of ostriches.
On the scale of being pedantic from 0 to 10, I rate this as a 7.5 .Your
post about I already posted that article a week
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 09:52:26PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Why not?
Exactly.
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:49:58PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Since we are being snippy...
rest snipped
snip
(All this snipping is reminding me of the story about the 3 mythical
women who cut the strings of people's lives when their time
John D. Giorgis wrote:
While I am sure that many of you will not support the first half of the proposed
ammendment, (although I would point out that this first half does not rule out civil
unions - such as the ones currently embraced by the gay community in Vermont.)
Nevertheless, I
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Friday browncoat republicans in the house of
representatives called the
police to arrest and remove democratic
representatives from a library in
the house of representatives. The future is here
In a message dated 7/24/2003 5:26:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
If John Ashcroft were anyone _but_ an evangelical
Christian (speaking as a non-evangelical
non-Christian) the way he is treated by the Left would
be recognized by everyone for what it is - sheer
Erik Reuter wrote:
As far as me being a jerk, I can't see how an intelligent person is
hoodwinked by this ridiculous propaganda.
I know. You're more of a tug than a jerk.
Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:37:23PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Personally, I like the story about the little girl who takes a basket
of goodies to her grandmother's house and there's a wolf involved.
What was the name of that? Something with hood, right?
Having read little writing in my
At 08:07 PM 7/24/2003 -0400 Robert J. Chassell wrote:
The phrase The British have learned suggests to a listening
public that the US President had US intelligence agencies investigate
the matter.
It does not suggest this to me. Indeed the mere fact that British
intelligence is being
At 05:53 PM 7/24/2003 -0500 The Fool wrote:
http://msnbc.com/news/940963.asp?0sl=-44cp1=1
Didn't they used to duel on the floors of Congress?
Sounds like classic ingomious political chicanery to me.
JDG
___
John D. Giorgis -
Bryon Daly wrote:
From: Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to figure out how to shrink the pics we took, though.
There's a whole bunch of waysm depending on the software you have,
Thanks, Byron, I figured it out. If anyone wants to see a few of the pics before I
wrangle with actually making
At 12:44 AM 7/25/2003 + Robert J. Chassell wrote:
John, rather admirably, says that the lack of search was because the
Administration judged it more important in the latter part of April
and May to protect Iraqis from looters and such than to protect
Americans in Washington, DC, where he
Brad DeLong wrote:
David said:
If wombats were credible WMD, he would have included them too. : )
...thus giving me the chance to point out that I was responsible for:
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blosxom.cgi/2002/Oct/22#wombat
Rich
VFP A Colder War
Yes, and thank
Things are going reasonably OK now.
This wasn't the case sometime last week. I've been having contractions,
and Wednesday of last week, it just got to where I couldn't lie down
when I needed to, and was horribly exhausted, and having contractions at
a rate that didn't bode entirely well for my
At 11:09 PM 7/24/2003 -0400 David Hobby wrote:
I'll tell you what. Change the amendment so that any two
adults can enter into a civil union, which the federal and
state governments must grant all the privileges of marriage,
and you have my support.
I disagree. Since every child is
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
