Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

//GK/gk_process: > QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup > R1# > *Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a > TIMER event > > *Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers > > *Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ///

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

f -Original Message- From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:09 PM To: Jeff Price (jeffpric) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue Jeff, Do a "debug gatekeeper main 10" on the gatekeeper and check/s

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

Jeff, Do a "debug gatekeeper main 10" on the gatekeeper and check/send the output when you make a call. It will tell you whats happening and if there is a routing failure at the gatekeeper. Also, take a look at this documentation http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/voice/cubegk/configuration/g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

shoot this. > > Thanks > Kalyan > > > From: To: Roger Källberg < > roger.kallb...@cygate.se>, "o...@ipexpert.com" , " > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" , " > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com" < > ccie_voice-boun...@online

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

voice@onlinestudylist.com" , "ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com" Date: 02/19/2010 12:02 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India Sent by: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Hi Roger, Thanks for replying. It adds the star by default when you pu

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

___ > Från: Kevin Hobson [kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com] > Skickat: den 19 februari 2010 07:28 > Till: o...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

c Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ Från: Kevin Hobson [kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com] Skickat: den 19 februari 2010 07:28 Till: o...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gate

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India Hi Kevin, According to your hq debug, the call is being properly routed to the pstn remote zone, therefore your hq rtr configuration should be good. I would like to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

Message- From: " Kevin Hobson" Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:42 To: Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10. After this the timer expi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10. After this the timer expires on the UCM and fails to complete. See below: HQ-RTR Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (916745738932) Tech-

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Question

Hi Ravindra, Can you show us the GK config and the output of show gatek end and sh gatek gw I think you need a zone prefix command under the GK config. regards, Bas Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 23:20:02 +0530 From: lakpr...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

but the experience and configuration confidence should >> greatly reduce the play around time. >> >> >> >> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Snow >> *Sent:* Wednesday, Oc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

studylist.com [ > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello > [mciarfe...@iplogic.com] > *Sent:* Friday, October 23, 2009 9:51 PM > *To:* Brett Saling > > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

tober 23, 2009 12:07 PM > *To:* Michael Ciarfello > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question > >Bug CSCsl74701 and the default intraregion audio codec service > parameter, ie, the parameter that is in effect

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

st.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello [mciarfe...@iplogic.com] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:51 PM To: Brett Saling Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question HI Brett. Looks like that bug should be fixed in 7.0(1) and newer (well, fixed

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

lo Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question Bug CSCsl74701 and the default intraregion audio codec service parameter, ie, the parameter that is in effect if you leave the dropdown at default in region config when specifying the intraregion codec

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

parameter mentioned above to g729” From: Brett [mailto:brett.sal...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 9:08 PM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: Mark Snow; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Dave Wong Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question Mark - No critical intentions

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

, 2009 9:08 PM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: Mark Snow; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Dave Wong Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question Mark - No critical intentions inferred :) Simply that, and to add to Michael's reply inline, if you absolutely positively have an '

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

Of *Mark Snow > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:44 AM > *To:* Brett > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Dave Wong > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question > > > > Not trying to be critical, only curious - where are you going with that > question

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

ave Wong Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question Not trying to be critical, only curious - where are you going with that question? Just trying to understand the relevance provided that the this H225 GK-Controlled Trunk and the HQ Phone are both in different Regions, and that

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

Not trying to be critical, only curious - where are you going with that question? Just trying to understand the relevance provided that the this H225 GK- Controlled Trunk and the HQ Phone are both in different Regions, and that the matrix between those regions is G729. Only asking because mayb

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

Indeed it does. And the reason that the 'sh gatek calls' shows 16k is that a BRQ/BCF is changing that BW from 128 to 16: Oct 21 11:57:01.187: RAS INCOMING PDU ::= value RasMessage ::= bandwidthRequest : { requestSeqNum 73 endpointIdentifier {"4A9ABE5C0001"} conference

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

KEEPER CALL INFO >>> >>> LocalCallID Age(secs) BW >>> 10-32843 4 16(Kbps) >>> Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr >>>src EP: hqph2-sccp

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

..@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice- boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dave Wong [dwch...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:20 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question Hi Here are the configurations on the HQ and PSTN router

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

>>CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port >>192.168.145.14 1720 192.168.145.14 63693 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Michael Ciarfello < >> mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote: >> >>> What device pool is

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

India calls HQ 5002? Try puttng the GK trunk in a g729 only region. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice- boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dave Wong [dwch...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:20 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

ager GK trunk in? >> What region is what device pool associated with? >> Is the MTP button checked? >> Any inbound fast start? >> Do you have a transcoder on the HQ router? Is it being invoked when India >> calls HQ 5002? >> >> Try puttng the GK trunk in a g729 only r

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

October 18, 2009 7:20 AM > *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question > > Hi > Here are the configurations on the HQ and PSTN router. My HQ router is > configured as a GK in CUCM and there's a GK controlled trunk pointing &g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dave Wong [dwch...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:20 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question Hi Here

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

Hi Here are the configurations on the HQ and PSTN router. My HQ router is configured as a GK in CUCM and there's a GK controlled trunk pointing towards to HQ GK from CUCM. The GK trunk is placed in a region that is supposed to use g729 to all other regions. The strange thing is, when PSTN phone ca

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper bandwidth question

Please post configs. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dave Wong [dwch...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 11:16 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeepe

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Questions Lab5c

--- > *From:* Tanner Ezell [tanner.ez...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:55 AM > *To:* Michael Ciarfello > *Cc:* Bill Hatcher; ccievoice > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Questions Lab5c > > Did you have a flag? > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Questions Lab5c

NO flag. I didn't know which one to bring. :) Didn't bring the white one though. From: Tanner Ezell [tanner.ez...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:55 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: Bill Hatcher; ccievoice Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Questions Lab5c

It's a play on a line from Eddie Izzard, where you can only declare victory or ownership with the planting of a flag. Don't mind me, going on 19 hours with 4 hours sleep :) On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Bill Hatcher wrote: > I'm not sure i know what you mean by a flag. > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 200

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Questions Lab5c

I'm not sure i know what you mean by a flag. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Tanner Ezell wrote: > Did you have a flag? > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Michael Ciarfello < > mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote: > >> I can't answer for IPexpert but I ignored PL and took it to mean >> Spain. It

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Questions Lab5c

Did you have a flag? On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Michael Ciarfello wrote: > I can't answer for IPexpert but I ignored PL and took it to mean Spain. > It doesn't matter. I did what the question asked and declared victory. > > > -- > *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onl

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Questions Lab5c

Same here, I just wanted to make sure I was not missing anything. Thanks for the response. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Michael Ciarfello wrote: > I can't answer for IPexpert but I ignored PL and took it to mean Spain. > It doesn't matter. I did what the question asked and declared victory.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Questions Lab5c

I can't answer for IPexpert but I ignored PL and took it to mean Spain. It doesn't matter. I did what the question asked and declared victory. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bill Hatcher [wch

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper controller trunk & MTP ( 7.X)

stian.rade...@crescendo.ro] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 1:23 PM To: Michael Ciarfello; vineet sanghi; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper controller trunk & MTP ( 7.X) As a result could we say, as a best practice, to uncheck "MTP Required" and

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper controller trunk & MTP ( 7.X)

On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello Sent: 14 May, 2009 8:05 PM To: vineet sanghi; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper controller trunk & MTP ( 7.X) SRND 7.0. See the section: H.323 Trunks with Media Termination Points Your case 1 looks like it complies with the SR

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper controller trunk & MTP ( 7.X)

SRND 7.0. See the section: H.323 Trunks with Media Termination Points Your case 1 looks like it complies with the SRND. There is also other discussion in the SRND for when to use MTP vs when not to. Later on there is a good discussion on MTP and SIP and DTMF-Relay. All-in-All the SRND should

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem

; > What are 1*, 38* and 98* are tech -prefixes assgined on CCM and CME ??? > > -anil > > --- On *Thu, 5/7/09, Onur Tufekci * wrote: > > > From: Onur Tufekci > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem > To: "Sergio Polizer" > Cc: anil...@ya

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem

paddr 172.8.102.1 1720  bandwidth interzone default 32  no shutdown   What are 1*, 38* and 98* are tech -prefixes assgined on CCM and CME ???   -anil --- On Thu, 5/7/09, Onur Tufekci wrote: From: Onur Tufekci Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem To: "Sergio Polizer&

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem

your GK_Trunk name. > > > -- > Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:42:51 -0700 > From: anil...@yahoo.com > To: mark.tur...@calence.com; onurvc...@gmail.com > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem > > > Hop-

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem

ail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem Hop-off configurations are used to override the zone prefix selection and force the call to be hopped-offed to a specified zone, regardless of the called number zone prefix. For example,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem

(config)#gatekeeper GK-B(config-gk)#gw-type-prefix 2# hopoff GK-A --- On Thu, 5/7/09, Onur Tufekci wrote: From: Onur Tufekci Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem To: "Turpin, Mark" Cc: "OSL Group" Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 1:50 AM When you use h

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem

When you use hopoff you should not need to use tech prefix. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Turpin, Mark wrote: > Zone prefix. > > > > Zone prefixes match a prefix to a gateway. > > > > -- > > *MARK TURPIN* | Systems Engineer | CCIE 21649 | Insight Networking | > www.insight.com > > *t.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper HopOFF problem

Zone prefix. Zone prefixes match a prefix to a gateway. -- MARK TURPIN | Systems Engineer | CCIE 21649 | Insight Networking | www.insight.com t. 314.656.2315 c. 314.277.7948 f. 314.656.2355 mark.tur...@insight.com The information contained i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config - solution for Single trunk, no BW CLI, no location, one call in sub and redundancy over PSTN

192.168.31.211:63255 CCM2CME_1 > Zone GK prefix 2* priority gateway list(s): > Priority 10: >192.168.31.215:60547 CCM2CME_2 > Priority 9: >192.168.31.211:63255 CCM2CME_1 > Zone GK prefix 011* priority gateway list(s): > Priority 5: >192.168.31.215:605

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION

s started on d sub --- On Wed, 22/4/09, James Key wrote: From: James Key Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION To: "adefila seun" , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009, 3:16 PM Make sure the CCM service is s

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION

Thanks. Tech Guy - Original Message - From: adefila seun To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ; Key James ; saralilin2...@yahoo.co.jp Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:35 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION the phones are not registering to the su

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION

the phones are not registering to the subscriber thanks --- On Wed, 22/4/09, saralilin2...@yahoo.co.jp wrote: From: saralilin2...@yahoo.co.jp Subject: Re: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION To: "seun adefila" , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" , "Key Ja

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION

shut the pub see if sub can register..and see if phone still registered. adefila seun wrote: Hello, the service is started on d sub --- On Wed, 22/4/09, James Key wrote: From: James Key Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION To: "adefila seun" , &

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION

Hello,   the service is started on d sub --- On Wed, 22/4/09, James Key wrote: From: James Key Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION To: "adefila seun" , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009, 3:16 PM Make sure the CC

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION

] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION The group has the pub and sub --- On Wed, 22/4/09, Kumar, Narinder wrote: From: Kumar, Narinder Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION To: "adefilabi...@yahoo.co.uk" , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION

The group has the pub and sub --- On Wed, 22/4/09, Kumar, Narinder wrote: From: Kumar, Narinder Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION To: "adefilabi...@yahoo.co.uk" , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009, 1:25 PM Ther

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER REGISTRTION

There could be couple of things, to start with check if your CCM group have both PUB and SUB preset in it. Regarding Ephone-dn registering to the GK, reload you gateway, that will fix the issue. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Be

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

chosen for prefix 3...; > one would think the trunk or gateway with priority 10 should have been > chosen. > > > > Tech Guy > > > - Original Message - > *From:* jeremy co > *To:* Marwa Ahmed ; Cliff > McGlamry; Arshad > Dhunna > *Cc:* ccie_voic

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config - solution for Single trunk, no BW CLI, no location, one call in sub and redundancy over PSTN

to HQ still uses H323-ID: CCM2CME_2 somehow and it did not use H323-ID: CCM2CME_1   curious to know if it was working OK with your setup   -AB --- On Wed, 4/8/09, Prabahar M wrote: From: Prabahar M Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config - solution for Single trunk, no BW

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

09 9:51 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem complete configuration is here: SUB is not started though. gatekeeper zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 zone local CCM cisco.com no zone subnet CME default enable zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 en

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

Original Message - > *From:* jeremy co > *To:* marwa > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 10:37 AM > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem > > 1# is a default prefix for call manager, I added it already in CCM c

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

t.com Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:37 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem 1# is a default prefix for call manager, I added it already in CCM config Jeremy On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:31 AM, marwa wrote: hi, to see it add the tech prefix unde

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

Cliff McGlamry ; Sergio > Polizer > *Cc:* Marwa Ahmed ; Arshad > Dhunna; > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 4:24 PM > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem > > Hi, > > interface Loopback0 > ip address 150.1.66

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

23-gateway commands. - Original Message - From: jeremy co To: Marwa Ahmed ; Cliff McGlamry ; Arshad Dhunna Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

; *From:* jeremy co > *To:* Marwa Ahmed ; Cliff > McGlamry; Arshad > Dhunna > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 AM > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem > > > complete configuration is here: >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

23-gateway commands. - Original Message - From: jeremy co To: Marwa Ahmed ; Cliff McGlamry ; Arshad Dhunna Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem complete configuration is here

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

...@gmail.com To: marwa_ah...@seegypt.com; cl...@mcglamry.net; arshad.dhu...@yahoo.co.in CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem complete configuration is here: SUB is not started though. gatekeeper zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 zone

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

...@gmail.com To: marwa_ah...@seegypt.com; cl...@mcglamry.net; arshad.dhu...@yahoo.co.in CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem complete configuration is here: SUB is not started though. gatekeeper zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 zone

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

complete configuration is here: SUB is not started though. gatekeeper zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 zone local CCM cisco.com no zone subnet CME default enable zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable no zone subnet CCM default enable zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable zone subnet C

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

Where is the ip add zone local CCM cisco.com "ipadd"  where is the GK ip add Thks --- On Thu, 16/4/09, jeremy co wrote: From: jeremy co Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date: Thursday, 16 April, 2009, 11:25 PM Hi, I cannot mak

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config - solution for Single trunk, no BW CLI, no location, one call in sub and redundancy over PSTN

GK 011* GK 2* GK3* GK4* GK9001* HQ-RTR# > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:05:25 -0400 > From: "Cliff McGlamry" > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config > To: "Linda Mordos

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

sage - From: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk) To: anil batra ; Tech Guy ; Cliff McGlamry Cc: OSL Group ; Vik Malhi Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:00 PM Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config If you are only allowed to create one trunk then this config will not wo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

Group; Vik Malhi Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config I am wondering what if there is just gk-trunk_1 and gk-trunk_2 given int the "sh gatekeeper endpoint" That is in case you are not allowed to create two trunk manually -one for Pub and one for sub. Will it still work

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

e: From: Cliff McGlamry Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config To: "Linda Mordosky (lmordosk)" , "Tech Guy" Cc: "OSL Group" , "Vik Malhi" Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 8:27 PM  Interesting.   When I set it up, I didn't use the arj

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

up , Vik Malhi Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config Interesting. When I set it up, I didn't use the arj reject-resource-low and it still worked. Vik, I saw you recommended she add that. Since mine worked without it, I'm curious what that command is supposed to do. Cliff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

osk) To: Tech Guy Cc: OSL Group ; Vik Malhi Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:44 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config I created two device pools in CCM, one device pool had only the Sub and the second device pool used only the Pub. This way I could use the Trunk reg

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

Linda From: Tech Guy [mailto:tech...@oletu.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:38 AM To: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk) Cc: Vik Malhi; OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config and what was the magic bullet? On Apr 7, 2009, at 10:25 AM, "Linda Mordosky (lmordosk)&quo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

mordosk); OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config I think you need to use the following config to specify that a specific h323id can only carry a maximum of one active call: Gatekeeper ... endpoint max-call h323id trunk_1 endpoint resource-threshold arj reject-resourc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

Thanks everyone for your assistance I got it working !!! Yeah Linda From: Vik Malhi [mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:22 AM To: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk); OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config I think you need to use the following

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk); OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config I think you need to use the following config to specify that a specific h323id can only carry a maximum of one active call: Gatekeeper ... endpoint max-call h323id trunk_1 endpoint resource-threshold arj

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

400 To: "Linda Mordosky (lmordosk)" , OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config Forgot to add the link which explains the resource threshold commands http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093f6 7.shtml From: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk)

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

Linda Mordosky (lmordosk) Cc: Tech Guy; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config Linda, I believe what you want is: endpoint resource-threshold <--- Turns on resource tracking at default 90% level endpoint max-calls h323id CCM_2 1 <-- Assigns max of

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

Guy; Linda Mordosky (lmordosk); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config If gateway is CallManager, define a new location and allocate enough bandwidth for one g729 call to this gatekeeper trunk. Tech Guy - Original Message - *From

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

h Guy; Linda Mordosky (lmordosk); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config If gateway is CallManager, define a new location and allocate enough bandwidth for one g729 call to this gatekeeper trunk. Tech Guy - Original Me

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config You set the resource threshold at the gateway end: ! gateway resource threshold high 70 low 60 ! Tech Guy - Original Message - From: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk) To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

Ok but if the gateway end is the Call Manager Sub how do you set it? Linda From: Tech Guy [mailto:tech...@oletu.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:38 AM To: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config You set the resource

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

You set the resource threshold at the gateway end: ! gateway resource threshold high 70 low 60 ! Tech Guy - Original Message - From: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk) To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 7:45 AM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ga

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config

Forgot to add the link which explains the resource threshold commands http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_tech_note09186a00800 93f67.shtml From: Linda Mordosky (lmordosk) Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 7:46 AM To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' Subject: Gatekeeper config

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

Wouldn't be the first time :-) CCIE OSL wrote: I hope, you are not dreaming about it! /Jin Jung... Chris Parker wrote: Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris Cliff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper load balancing

Appropriate prepending and "max-conn 1" under outbound dialpeers on your originating H.323 GW? You need prepending to prevent calls to the same number landing on one GK trunk on CCM side. That is assuming you are allowed only 2 calls from H.323 GW to CCM at any time. If you need to load-balance r

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

It's not needed to accomplish this. But if told to use it to accomplish some other requirementmaybe. It would just depend. - Original Message - From: "CCIE OSL" To: "Cliff McGlamry" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:23 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_V

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

I hope, you are not dreaming about it! /Jin Jung... Chris Parker wrote: Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me. I kept thinking

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me. I kept thinking about it. Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper documen

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

Hey, Cliff, Man! First, Thanks for all you time on this. I see your method, and it's wonderful that this works.. One question, Let's say, if you are allow to use bandwidth command on Gk, would you use same method?? bandwidth interzone 16 /Jin Jung... Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me. I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

This bugged me. I kept thinking about it. Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper documentation. Found what I was looking for. To summarize the problem as I understand it: 1. Trunks coming in from CCM to GK. Trunk to sub is priority for incoming calls from GK. 2.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution

zone prefixes. That's about all I can do with it. - Original Message - From: "CCIE OSL" To: "Cliff McGlamry" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution Thanks Cliff, I was planning to pu

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution

m:* kapil atrish <mailto:nice_cha...@yahoo.com> *To:* CCIE OSL <mailto:ccie...@gmail.com> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> *Sent:* Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:37 AM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question H

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution

ination-pattern 1... session target ras tech-prefix 3# dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad - Original Message - From: kapil atrish To: CCIE OSL Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:37 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

nfig would be straight forward: zone-prefix GK 1* gw-priority 10 Sub_Trunk_1 zone-prefix GK 1* gw-priority 9 Pub_Trunk_2 --- On Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL wrote: From: CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question To: "kapil atrish" Cc: "ccie Me" , ccie_voic

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

is already active on Sub, any subsequent call from Site C will not be allowed due to b/w limitation over that trunk (Location). Next call should fall back to Pub trunk which is having gw-priority 9. Thanks... --- On *Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL //* wrote: From: CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CC

<    1   2   3   4   >