I found it http://www.gerorama.com/gerobase/
It was in CF talk list on 1/6/2007. Boy I am getting old. I can't remember
anything very long.
-Original Message-
From: David Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Content Management Op
> Don't you hate site that return you to the root but in the other language?
frankly i've found hardly anybody works thru a website that way. normal
folks come in, set their locale/language (or better yet their
locale/language is silently delivered to them) & navigate thru the site. a
good app rem
> Any ideas on what relationship the &ArticleAction=language parameter is
> doing to perform the translation ?
same table, same ID, different language. probably just sets the new language
as the opposite of the current language (as least that's how we did
thai\english sites). it also doesn't appe
I think it depends on your business rules (rather than technology)
The point I was trying to get across is that the user should not be
limited to a repository of just that language as there might NOT be
translations of that particular content (brand guidelines, Templates?)
and the content should
> It should never happen, that a spanish website gets english content by
> itself because the spanish version is missing. So if the spanish version
> of a pdf is missing, throw an error, not get the english version :-) You
> might give the client bad information.
here here.
[Todays Threads]
[Th
Content libraries in my system are not content items. It is a
structurized way of sorting content, under categories and by meta
labels. In my case, each language has it's own Content Library because
the category labels could be multilingual as well. It is a bit hard to
explain, but see it as a wind
> 1) Content library, this should be a content item and assigned either
> to multiple languages or a single language (e.g. english and spanish
> versions both link to the english download as there is only one...
> which we can then separate, or it defaults to english PDF if there is
> no spanish v
gt; is
> > doing to perform the translation ?
> >
> > As each article whether it is English or Welsh has the same articleid
> > ???
> >
> > Any ideas ?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 3:46 PM
Subject: RE: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist (making a cms
multlingual)
> If for instance you have the follo
for Welsh
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 September 2004 12:02
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist (making a cms
multlingual)
Sounds to me that a single article can have translations (a standard
way of dealing with content)
I
PROTECTED]
Sent: September 20, 2004 06:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist (making a cms
multlingual)
If you look at the following example website
http://www.allwalesunit.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=5
and click on the Cymraeg link at the top of the page, which lo
leAction=language parameter is
> doing to perform the translation ?
>
> As each article whether it is English or Welsh has the same articleid
> ???
>
> Any ideas ?
>
>
>
> From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 Sept
ny ideas ?
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 September 2004 10:39
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist (making a cms
multlingual)
Depends on your requirements (or the clients!)
1) Content library, this should be a content item and
Depends on your requirements (or the clients!)
1) Content library, this should be a content item and assigned either
to multiple languages or a single language (e.g. english and spanish
versions both link to the english download as there is only one...
which we can then separate, or it defaults to
And does someone separate content library, file folders, accounts,
workflow, approval queues, template libraries, etc. per language, or do
all languages in the system use the same libraries?
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377,
es ?
>
>
>
> From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 September 2004 16:16
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist
>
> > for multilingual content = not just creating a separate branche for
>
above table ?
And how would the relationship between the PRID's for example work for
different languages ?
From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 September 2004 16:16
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist
The issues with object based content management are for example,
- do you create a totally separate content repository based on
that perticulair language? Or do all languages select content out of the
same bin. So all languages get mixed.
- do all languages have the same accoun
What features are useful and which a waste of time? Depends on your target market for the solution. The requirements for corporate/enterprise are different to SME and membership based organizations.
Johan
www.assetnow.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[
I guess they still use seperate branches, according to some of the screenshots shown on the website. One of the screenshots show a treeview, and on top a dropdown box with "english" in it. My guess is changing this box changes the branch.
>Well that's the million dollar question, when I asked and
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 September 2004 17:30
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist
How does one manage multilingual content in ShadoMX, I am interested in
this specific feature. Do you have screens showing how it works?
_
[Todays Threads]
[Th
How does one manage multilingual content in ShadoMX, I am interested in this specific feature. Do you have screens showing how it works?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
> Ideally I'd want to work with a
> language aware system such that I can change languages in
> the cms to see the alternative version of the content in a
> different language.
ShadoMX has multilanguage support at object level, so you only have one
site tree etc and can define multiple translati
I
can change languages in the cms to see the alternative version of the
content in a different language.
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 September 2004 16:16
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist
> for mult
I have seen it in spectra just using Structs but the issue here is
that you should get away from one record = one bit of content..
if you are doing versioning you will have an object that is a content
and then another table with the versions and languages ..
MD
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:15:33 +0700
I would suggest you set up a simple frame for the system first, .. if
you want to implement all the mentioned features you may kiss you summer
vacation goodbye.
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoor
Including workflow editors, dynamic authoring rules on department and
role and user level, and versioning of objects? .. I don't know how long
it took you but It took me 3 months work in the evening hours. It is
very difficult.
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 382
> for multilingual content = not just creating a separate branche for
> other languages.
yeah that was the first thing folks suggested when we started discussing
this for farcry. i'm not for that technique (1 new language = 1 new site).
we'll see how this plays out w/farcry.
> Creating a system b
Tuesday's fine :)
Also the other things that are requested are:
1) selective workflow (not everyone needs to follow it)
2) Dated publishing (make live on .. until)
3) Preview of content... in site content..
4) Site Versioning and Content Versioning
5) Content check out and check in
6) Managemen
My case for creating one is this
I want to understand intimately the workings of one. Every time in
the past i've tried to get into the inner workings of an application,
I've ended up saying "to hell with it, I can make one myself". It's
not a lower cost way ot doing it, definitely, but I
ading you know :)
Doug
- Original Message -
From: Mike Kear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:56:27 +1000
Subject: Re: Content Management System (CMS) Wishlist
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Piece of cake Mark! Might not get it done tonight. Will Monday do?
Than
Multilingual, as in frontend support is still quite unique. Only bigger
vendors in the medium, or enterprise level markets have builtin support
for multilingual content = not just creating a separate branche for
other languages.
Creating a system being able to handle multilingual content, on obj
You Could always start with the Old Spectra OPen Source :-)
Or
FarCry
As starting points as these have the engines to build with
Cheers
BK
- Original Message -
From: Kola Oyedeji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:49:11 +0100
Subject: RE: Content Management Syste
> which is still lacking in many of the cms systems I have come across is
> *decent* support for multilingual content. I believe the latest version
> of farcry may support this but I haven't played with it yet.
define "decent".
as a first step last year i guess, we made it unicode compliant. the
Piece of cake Mark! Might not get it done tonight. Will Monday do?
Thanks a lot for your comments. Given me food for thought.
Cheers
Mike Kear
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
.com,.net,.org domains from AUD$20/Year
[Todays Threads]
[This Messag
Mike
Most CMS systems I have come across have the same or similar
functionality so picking anyone off the shelf - commonspot, farcry,
ShadoMX should give you an idea of common functionality - one thing
which is still lacking in many of the cms systems I have come across is
*decent* support for m
Ohh many things i could add here.. but want to finish before nightfall!
1) Have you seen Aura (used by FarCry?) That is CSS and what have you.
2) Output content in XML and then apply a stylesheet to it?
3) Assetmanagement for images and documents and flash etc
4) Search engine
5) EASY type creatio
Daniel Farmer wrote:
> Does anyone have a database schema that they could share with me for
> a content management system for a small to medium size website?
>
> I just need direction on how to go about setting up the tables etc...
> for links, content...etc
It'll be a fair bit of work to take
I seem to recall a content management database schema at
http://www.databaseanswers.com . Not
sure how useful it is, but should be a start. I think it's under "database
models".
Christian
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 17:27
To
FarCry is open source, and (if I remember correctly) actually has a place
you can go view the DB schema it uses right in the online admin area.
Probably more complex than you need for a small-medium site, but it might be
worth a look.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel F
I would install CFMX 6.1 from the get go on a new server
- Calvin
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Meloche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: Content Management Systems - a short list...
> Geoff:
>
> I am very hap
Brian,
We have an enterprise version, but that is not as cut and dry pricing as the
hosted. The Enterprise version handles DB updates as well. Some of our
larger clients running this system are:
http://www.akingump.com
http://www.venable.com
http://www.munsch.com
- j
james curran
technical di
We have also worked with the guys from Asset Nowterrific to work with,
very helpful and always willing to go the extra mile. Their CMS is good,
extendable, and covers most of the needs of many businesses.
Regards,
Eric Hoffman
Datastream Connexion
"The reasonable man adapts himself to th
www.assetnow.com
Can generate content to static html pages - however not all features are
support on static pages.
Johan
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Meloche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:51 AM
Subject: Content Management
> True. Ours stores images on the file system, but documents are stored
> in the database. Both have led to many problems. See below.
>
Traditionally, there have been many problems both in storing files in
databases and storing metadata in file systems. This has lead many to
feel the correct
Element, by my company.
www.mindseyeelement.com
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc
(www.mindseye.com)
Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia)
Email: [EMAIL PRO
Hello,
http://www.editingmadeeasy.com
This product is geared for most small businesses. It provides the
flexibility of site updates, enforces business rules, and is completely
software independent. It does not require *anything* other than FTP on the
webserver serving the site to be edited.
Whoops! I should have been more clear. If you want ColdFusion support
you need to buy our ColdFusion edition, which includes a 1 cpu license
to CFMX for J2EE. If you already have a license to CFMX for J2EE than
we will give you a discount if you want the ColdFusion edition.
-Matt
On Thursda
Our product does require CFMX for J2EE if you want ColdFusion support.
If there is anything else we can specifically help you with please
contact us offlist.
-Matt
On Thursday, July 31, 2003, at 12:25 PM, Brian Meloche wrote:
> Thanks, Matt. I will take a look at your website.
>
> It sounds
ECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:01 PM
Subject: RE: Content Management Systems - a short list...
> > I would be interested in hearing opinions on some good
> > CF-based CMSs. I need to develop a short list so that I
> > can evaluate a few systems.
> >
I know you specified CF-based CMSs, but you might also be interested in
what my company, Montara Software offers in our Alchemy EX product.
Alchemy EX is a J2EE-based CMS that integrates with CF seamlessly
allowing CFML developers to take full advantage of our rich API and
robust Java infra
Wish I could say that I'm not a sales person... :) Well that's not true -- I say that
all the time, just not in this context. :) I am however a developer.
> DB should act as a STORAGE mechanism and NOT DYNAMIC, in
> most cases (This is not how the existing system works).
Tapestry does work this
> I would be interested in hearing opinions on some good
> CF-based CMSs. I need to develop a short list so that I
> can evaluate a few systems.
>
> If you could pick one... which one? And why? Any
> experience with one system or another?
Well, as a CommonSpot vendor, I'm biased, but I thin
CommonSpot from Paperthin. It is quite spendy ($20,000 for standard
install) but it rocks the world if you have a client that had the resources.
We are implementing one right now and it really is quite good. One thing
you will learn is no one CMS has it all, but this comes pretty close in most
a
Coherence to start, but maybe we shall move this offlist where we can
philosophically analyze the analogies between people's names and the
components that make up CMS's without disturbing others :)
Adam.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chunshen Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday,
> Make any sense?
Nope.
Adam.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chunshen Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 3:43 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Content Management System
>
>
> How interesting! This guy is sometime called Don Li, some
> other time called Li, and yet s
The term "content management" has been used to describe a wide array of different
methods of publishing and "managing" content. They range from a db containing a list
of complete pages tied to something like soEditor, to a system that uploads snippets
of content from MS word through smtp to get
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 2:45 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Content Management System
>
>
> I'd put forth that content management consists not only of
> those three
> elements as MS, but also the integration of a "pecking order"
> of people
> i
I would maybe add in the enforcement of who gets to edit and approve what, although I
suppose that still falls within the scope of the original definition, since the need
for security is an outgrowth of the needs associated with creation, publication etc.
Otherwise that original def pretty muc
I'd put forth that content management consists not only of those three
elements as MS, but also the integration of a "pecking order" of people
in control of publishing rights and strict rules enforcing what is and
is not published based on the input of all necessary parties.
Other than that, as
I'm sure :D
Cheers,
--Matt--
-Original Message-
From: Manesh Manickam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 9:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Content Management System
Are there any free ones? Or has anyone made on..i would
give full credit to the person!
-
What about free? Are there any free ones? Or has anyone made on..i would
give full credit to the person!
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 11:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
> cant really get much lower cost that free...
>
> i.e. Spectra & Far
> cant really get much lower cost that free...
>
> i.e. Spectra & FarCry
I can't comment on FarCry, but just because Spectra itself is free, now,
doesn't mean that it's the cheapest solution by a long shot.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (20
Blimey, when I read your run-down here I realize I know next to bugger all about what
Tapestry can do.
How do we get these things out of your head and in a format that people can read and
understand?
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Original Message ---
If you include labor costs f
If you include labor costs for custom scripting required to deliver a "complete
solution", free cm tools or frameworks like Spectra or FarCry can easily cost more
than SparkPlug (which is pretty darn cheap)... I've looked at SparkPlug and I'd say
that its inexpensive price really doesn't have an
> 1. Its Free
> 2. CFC's
> 3. Automated DB Scripting
> 4. Excellent Userbase and I would say already larger and more active that
> Spectra ever was (outside of Macromedia).
> 5. Easier Extendabillity.
> 6. Written for CFMX and not a CF5/MX bodge which 1.5.2 is.
> 7. Its Free
8. its i18n ready (wel
cant really get much lower cost that free...
i.e. Spectra & FarCry
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Maxim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 15:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Content Management System
Speaking of low-cost CMS'...has anyone used 13amp's SparkPlug?
http://www.13amp.n
some would disagree...its just my
£0.10 (my 2p is free.)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 14:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Re: Content Management System
Neil, I am just curious why would you personally go for Far Cry before
Spectra?
Kind Re
: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Re: Content Management System
Personally, I would choose FarCry or Spectra in that order : FarCry requires
CFMX while Spectra requires CF4.5 and up (though 1.5.2 may need 5 and up I
cant remember its been a while since I looked as we are on 5
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:24 PM
> To: CF-Talk
y 03, 2003 4:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Re: Content Management System
Personally, I would choose FarCry or Spectra in that order : FarCry requires
CFMX while Spectra requires CF4.5 and up (though 1.5.2 may need 5 and up I
cant remember its been a while since I looked as we are on 5 with most our
& spectrasource.macromedia.com
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 04:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Re: Content Management System
Waugh!
Thanks Mike, but unfortunately I can't hawk New Epoch's cm solution on this
thread. :) Tapestry requires
Waugh!
Thanks Mike, but unfortunately I can't hawk New Epoch's cm solution on this thread. :)
Tapestry requires CF 5 and they need it to support CF 4.5. Not to mention the price
points are above their limit.
The multilingual version 5 (which will be the only version available soon -- you're
no
d was really pretty impressed
with it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Content Management System
> <<>>
> Their web site says "pricing starts at just $100". I
> think you can get a
> developer
>
> Regards,
> Steve Drucker
> CEO
> Fig Leaf Software
> www.figleaf.com
> 1-877-FIG-LEAF
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:57 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Content Management System
<<>>
Their web site says "pricing starts at just $100". I think you can get a
developer edition for free, but to use it in a production environment it's
n
: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Content Management System
And ActiveEdit is free
==
Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
ISP rated: http
isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Drucker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: RE: Content Management System
| Not a lot of options for less than $500.
|
| 1) MM Contri
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Content Management System
I should add that it should be cheap (< $500).
I tried contentmonger lite, but I don't want users playing with paths.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
Take a look at this one, not sure on the price tag although I know there are different
versions for instance multi-lingual costs more etc..
http://www.turnkey.to/432.cfm
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Original Message ---
I should add that it should be cheap (< $500).
I tried co
> I should add that it should be cheap (< $500).
>
> I tried contentmonger lite, but I don't want users playing
> with paths.
For that price range, need it be CF-based? You might look at things like
Zope + CMF:
http://www.zope.org/
http://cmf.zope.org/
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http:/
Or this one?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/modus/
-Original Message-
From: Costas Piliotis
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Content Management System
Tried this one yet?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cosmoscf/
-Original Message-
From
Tried this one yet?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cosmoscf/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Content Management System
I should add that it should be cheap (< $500).
I tr
CMLite is definitely not any sort of solution for a business. Strictly ultra-basic
stuff. If I can ever find the time I'll rewrite it so it uses what I'd consider to be
basic best practices like cfqueryparam, among other things.
---
Matt Robertson,
I should add that it should be cheap (< $500).
I tried contentmonger lite, but I don't want users playing with paths.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2003 4:21 pm
Subject: Content Management System
> Does anyone know of a CMS that's easy to use that
I was going to say that or one of their cms products.
The only problem I have with them is that at least in the cms
products, a lot of the site is in COM objects.
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 6:36:50 PM, you wrote:
JB> www.ektron.com emPower
JB> [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
Mine does, among others.
http://mysecretbase.com/page_20.html
Coming out with a fully translateable version in the very near future. Have a user
thats got most of it into French for me already.
This one is almost done and is running on 4.5 and mySQL:
http://64.37.102.84/en/control.cfm
--
> Does anyone know of a CMS that's easy to use that runs on
> CF4.5/SQL Server 7?
CommonSpot, from PaperThin (http://www.paperthin.com/) fits the bill; we've
done deployments on CF 4.5.1 through CFMX. I'm pretty sure that Site
Executive also will work in that environment. We have experience with
www.ektron.com emPower
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Does anyone know of a CMS that's easy to use that runs on CF4.5/SQL Server 7?
>
>
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.h
Check out FarCryfully mx and very very very nice indeed.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2003 15:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Content Management--- Merant Collage
Check out Ektron.com
Works with both CF or ASP.
-Original
Check out Ektron.com
Works with both CF or ASP.
-Original Message-
From: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: Content Management--- Merant Collage
Has anyone used this product or evaluated it?
http://www.merant
> Probably some combination of stubbornness and personal need. :)
>
Fair enough.
> It's also still a very new and rapidly changing market and (seemingly)
not
> reached the point of saturation yet.
>
The research firms seem to disagree with you.
> Yes this is the rationalle for Interwoven's ent
> What I am curious about it why you are even bothering to
> try and enter the CMS market.
Probably some combination of stubbornness and personal need. :)
> First, the CMS market is crowed with well established players.
It's also still a very new and rapidly changing market and (seemingly) not
than 1500 word article on Evolt.org
the other day on how to implement your own CMS.
-Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 8:32 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Content Management
>
> >
>> Compare something like CommonSpot or Spectra to one CM
>> product I saw which submits rich text content from MS Word
>> for inclusion in a predesigned html template using _SMTP_
>> from _within_ MS Word.
>
> Or, for that matter, just compare CommonSpot to Spectra -
> they're radically different
> I was pretty heavily involved at Allaire with Spectra
> (I was a field based consultant specializing in Spectra).
Good to know. :)
> I think that one of the issues with buying pre written
> packages (like Tapestry) is figuring out how to use them.
Yea, I've not been surprised that my research
> Compare something like CommonSpot or Spectra to one CM
> product I saw which submits rich text content from MS Word
> for inclusion in a predesigned html template using _SMTP_
> from _within_ MS Word.
Or, for that matter, just compare CommonSpot to Spectra - they're radically
different, I thi
> Content Management, like Customer Relationship
> Management, tends to be used to mean different things
> to different people
I think I tend to agree ... Even a cursory glance at the CM products
landscape is enough to make some people's heads spin with the incredible
variances in both features a
Isaac, I was pretty heavily involved at Allaire with Spectra (I was a field
based consultant specializing in Spectra). I think that one of the issues
with buying pre written packages (like Tapestry) is figuring out how to use
them. For instance is Tapestry a full stand-alone application
generato
Isaac,
Content Management, like Customer Relationship Management, tends to be used
to mean different things to different people and many clients don't
understand which aspect is important to them and why.
When I was at GE Information Services, they had two issues. First was
balancing local cont
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
