other than the allowing of magic packets out the switch port for
the purpose of WOL.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco
Thanks Chuck will look into that!
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Church [mailto:chuckchu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 9:27 PM
To: 'Aaron Riemer'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 802.1x - clients that go to sleep
Can you disable WOL on the clients? Seems
might actually need to look at :)
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 9:19 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 802.1x - clients
nProbe or softflowd will generate the netflows based on SPAN traffic
received over the interface.
flow-fanout can be used to push flows to another collector.
http://www.splintered.net/sw/flow-tools/docs/flow-fanout.html
http://www.mindrot.org/projects/softflowd/
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original
acl
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 07:51, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Does cisco have routing rules to prevent spooling?
eg: Our network is 66.49.127.0/24
how can I prevent the source ip other than this network to go out?
Thank you
find yourself locked
out before you have finished.
I've always taken the aaa config and copied it to the disk on the
router using ftp/sftp. Then done a copy disk0:filename to running to
avoid that.
Aaron
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 03:28, Ambedkar p.ambed...@gmail.com wrote:
HIi, thanks
Is a trunk port to the PC out of the picture?
-Aaron
On 11/2/2011 11:15 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
Hi all , i have a layer 2 switch , i want to connect a PC to a port and number
of DHCP servers to other ports
i want to the PC to communicate with each server every 5 minutes
for example PC
Can you not generate a new key?
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 13:58, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater jf...@princeton.edu wrote:
I am running SXI3 which has the SSH bug that stops SSH logins from working if
you change the HOSTNAME.
Well... I went and changed the hostname and now ssh fails and have to use
router is not doing aps, the
stm-4 is protected between the landing station and the router site, and the
submarine system is protected between Sao Paulo and NY (which would be
expected).
Aaron
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:19, Persio Pucci per...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris,
there's no QoS anywhere
Or use Kron instead of EEM.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/feature/guide/g_kron.html
Cheers,
-Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
(avayner)
Sent: Wednesday, 6 July 2011 7:00 AM
. But how do I get
the linux gateway to issue these gratuitous ARPs for the virtual NAT
address? How does the cisco ASAs take care of this problem?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated J
Thanks!
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
Also make sure that your tftp server is able to do larger then 32meg files.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 17:24, Martin Clifton martin.clif...@vu.edu.auwrote:
Hi,
If you are using the default control plane policy then you will find that
this is rate-limiting your tftp, causing it to timeout.
into was unacceptably long reboot times.
We also found the code conversion was unacceptably long.
Cisco highly recommends the PRP-3.
Our experience was that XR on the PRP-2 was less than stellar other users
may have a different experience.
Mack
*From:* Aaron [mailto:dudep...@gmail.com]
*Sent
XR works just fine with prp-2
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 13:06, Mack McBride mack.mcbr...@viawest.com wrote:
The GSR is still a solid supported platform, unfortunately the support
contracts are completely
out of line with where the GSR fits in the grand scheme of things. The
newer PRP-3 cards
functions such as authentication
etc with bridging?
Can someone please shed some light?
Thanks,
-Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
router not a Cisco :)
It also may be your Provider has direct IP over the ATM PVC. Here, the
device with the DSL-Modem acts as a router and has the /29 on it's LAN
side.
I hope this is the case.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
-Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Jurgen Marenda [mailto:j
second that.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 20:37, Antonio Soares amsoa...@netcabo.pt wrote:
Do you have one 12K running regular IOS ? I would try to do the upgrade
there and also confirm that the LC has in fact 1GB of mem.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
I am using the keyspan with little problems. I'm using securecrt for the
mac. The current of securecrt
(6.7.0 (build 123)) version seems to have fixed the previous requirement to
map a key to send break, aka tn_break.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 15:15, ryanL ryan.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
screen
Cable mgmt is typically specific to the linecard/spa. They might not work
with other linecards.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:56, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
I received a couple of cable management brackets with my ASR9ks and they
are so handy that I'd love to get some for the rest of
Thanks again Phil.
Cheers,
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2011 6:34 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ingress vs egress queues
On 03/03
first go through the ingress queue and then to the egress
queue before it is 'switched'.
I have been trying to find some good documentation to aid my understanding
in this area. If anyone could help me out with this it would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
-Aaron
If you are using GRE look into using keepalives.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk827/tk369/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
48cffc.shtml
Cheers,
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Righa Shake
Sent
table?
Thanks,
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
So source PIM enabled routers will register the source multicast group with
the RP.
That's what I wanted to know thanks.
This link explains the registration process.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos60/swconfig60-multicast/
html/pim-overview11.html
Thanks again,
-Aaron
the world and AS-PATH would take care of the rest?
Can someone clarify these points or am I completely off track?
Thanks,
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Yann GAUTERON
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 1
Thanks for the info Phil.
My apologies did not mean to hijack. Realised as soon as I sent it.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 4:59 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Is layer 2 forwarded over GET VPN?
Interested to know.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Muhammad Jawwad
Paracha
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011 7:56 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp
Thanks Joshua you mention that the anycast hosts actually advertise their
host route? Do they typically run a routing protocol to do this?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of joshua sahala
Sent
Sweet yes I have heard of done a little bit of routing with daemons under linux
such as zebra for ospf / bgp.
Sounds like a really neat trick :)
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rathlev [mailto:pe...@rathlev.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 6:58 AM
To: Aaron Riemer
Cc: cisco
3 is the syslog level.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 13:31, Farooq Razzaque farooq_...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi
U mean in (%SIBYTE-CFC10-3) 10 is the line card which is generating this
error..
what number '3' is reflecting in this log..
From: farooq_...@hotmail.com
To:
Did you enable IGMPv3 on the switch?
How did you ensure all your hosts were running IGMPv3?
From memory I had to registry hack the windows hosts to get it to run the
expected version.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]
physical checks are done by the switch port
and how does it determine if media is attached? Is a frame received over the
fibre initially which brings the port up but a subsequent failure will go on
undetected?
Any reference links would be great J
Thanks group.
Aaron
by the switch port
and how does it determine if media is attached? Is a frame received over the
fibre initially which brings the port up but a subsequent failure will go on
undetected?
Any reference links would be great! J
Thanks guys,
Aaron
Ahh silly me Thanks for the clarification mate :)
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Lincoln Dale [mailto:l...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 11:19 AM
To: Aaron Riemer
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Switch Port Question
On 25/01/2011, at 2:13 PM
Hi Lincoln,
yes,
swltch 2 would consider the interface to be operationally down (loss of
light).
switch 1 is still receiving light.
If the interface is considered to be operationally down why does it still
transmit light out its TX path?? This is what is confusing me.
Thanks,
Aaron
requests but obviously this is in reverse and I assume that
IGMPv3 would be backward compatible with previous versions.
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:jneiber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 11:37 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c
any
snooping information on the switch and thus would need to wait for
subsequent queries / membership reports?
Let us know what you find.
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:jneiber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 12:19 PM
To: Aaron Riemer
Cc
So, how would you propose that the system know that you are looking for an
IPV6 config vs something else like a description or named acl/tunnel/etc?
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 13:31, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 05/01/2011 16:01, Brandon Applegate wrote:
Is there a reason that ipv6
You can get SSH for 2511. Use 12.0s.
Yes it would be an old image (12.0(21 or so))
Aaron
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:16, Garry g...@gmx.de wrote:
On 30.12.2010 21:02, Jay Nakamura wrote:
Do anyone have recommendation on console server? I have about 10
devices per location I want console
I'ved used in it in the past. No issues seen back then. now you might want
to check to see if the card can do full feeds of bgp still (know some of the
older cards ran into running out of memory)
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 18:21, Dominic Ogbonna domi...@broadconnect.cawrote:
We are considering
Maybe IPSLA?
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:40, Chris Evans chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com wrote:
If you wanted you could break the port channel and run equal cost multipath
bgp... then you run bfd over each link..
I agree though. Hold timer is easier and will probably suit you fine..
On Nov 11, 2010
Not sure if 1gb will work. I know the smaller ones did (32, 64, 128).
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 16:01, Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com wrote:
Couple people responded off-list that any PCMCIA-CF adapter will work.
Thanks! Was there any CF size limitation or something about boot ROM
update I
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Dmitry Kiselev dmi...@dmitry.net wrote:
...
Pluggable Present : yes
Pluggable Type : OC48-LR
you've got to plug a 10Gb capable optic into a ten gig ethernet port
to make it work!
HTH,
aaron
___
cisco
Hey guys,
Is there anywhere in Australia that auctions off or resells refurb Cisco kit
other than ebay?
I am interested in building a lab at home.
Thanks,
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
There was a change done in 3.8 to allow for multiple | so in 3.8 and later
if you want multiple pipes you have to use after the first one.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 21:54, 陈云峰 che...@qware.com wrote:
hi Pelle,
It`s 3.6.3 here, thank you very much,now I know it`s coursed by
different
Typically you want to ensure that you can do scrambling with what ever card
you use.
Typical setup is a card with a built in CSU/DSU and enable kentrox
scrambling...
Aaron
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 16:33, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
On 9/24/2010 4:07 PM, Jay Nakamura wrote:
Unless you
I think you have to stay with the SDH standand so,
E3 not DS3 but you should be able to mix and match E3 and E1.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:28, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Please help me with understanding if I have channelised STM1 card -
1) I can configure 3xDS3
The distance also depends on the quality of the fiber in the ground, the
quality of the splices, and any connections.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:54, Hansen, Ulrich Vestergaard B. (E R WP EN ES 4
2) u...@siemens.com wrote:
Hi Vinny,
I've got personel and very good experience with optics from
You would need to change the duplex (half or full) to solve this, not the
speed.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 22:03, Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch
connection) - I thought that setting
speed auto would solve
Perl.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:21, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi all
i want to ping several hosts at the same time
if i use tclsh scripting i will be waiting for each ping session to finish
what other ways i have to do ?
___
Thanks Lincoln.
The server team must be using the Route based on IP hash method then.
All adapters in the NIC team must be attached to the same physical switch
or an appropriate set of stacked physical switches.
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Lincoln Dale [mailto:l...@cisco.com]
Sent
spikes but rather the output
drops that we are seeing oversubscribing our 6548 line cards.
Anyone have any further ideas?
Thanks,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Mayers [mailto:p.may...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 11:14 PM
To: Aaron Riemer
Cc: 'Matthew Huff'; 'JC
Good point mate. Will check it out.
-Original Message-
From: Matlock, Kenneth L [mailto:matlo...@exempla.org]
Sent: Thursday, 15 July 2010 9:51 PM
To: Aaron Riemer; Phil Mayers
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Brief CPU spikes on 6500 Sup 720
I know it's a longshot
One thing to point out is the packet captures did not indicate destination
adress of the subnet broadcast address however.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Riemer
Sent: Thursday, 15 July 2010 9:56 PM
for this kind of behaviour?
Thanks,
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
?
Thanks,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of JC Cockburn
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 8:03 PM
To: 'Phil Mayers'
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brief CPU spikes on 6500 Sup 720
started
occurring!
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Huff [mailto:mh...@ox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 10:41 PM
To: 'Aaron Riemer'; 'JC Cockburn'; 'Phil Mayers'
Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Brief CPU spikes on 6500 Sup 720
Since you are running
Forgive my ignorance. What is ECPM??
Shouldn't all routed traffic be handled by the active HSRP node?
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Lovell [mailto:belov...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 10:38 PM
To: Aaron Riemer
Cc: 'JC Cockburn'; 'Phil Mayers'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Step 4 *Type the Cancel User command to close a TL1 session:
*CANC-USER:[TID]:USERID:CTAG;*
*
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/optical/15000r9_0/tl1/sonet/reference/guide/tl1a90r_prprv.html#wp26568
*
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 18:00, Daniel D Jones ddjo...@riddlemaster.orgwrote:
Is there any
M isn't a letter?? :)
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:56, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:48:28AM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
If both devices were the same I would just shrug and think the C2801
wasn't up to the job. But I have one device with no problems
Xmodem might be you're best bet if tftp doesn't work...
Connect via console (assume you already are).
First did you confirm that confreg = 0x2102?
ROMmon Recovery for the Cisco 3600/3700/3800 Series Routers
If the file is over 32mb you need to ensure your tftp server supports large
file size.
For windows, I've had success with tftpd32 http://tftpd32.jounin.net/
Solaris 9 and 10 should have large file support as do recent versions of bsd
and linux.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 21:04, scott owens
So you are asking not MSC utilization but interface. There is a SNMP mib you
can use to monitor your interface utilization.
Aaron
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 08:06, bas kilo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a command to view the utilization of a
MSC in a CRS?
We are using
+1
clock line
crc4
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:41, Martin Moens mo...@carrier2carrier.comwrote:
E1 errors are often caused by clocking issues - are you shure you should
provide clocking on the A-end?
Often clocking is provided by the network.
Tried to switch on crc4?
Martin
On Friday, 11
The boot times are longer. The PRP-3 runs only xr and should boot faster.
There are a lot of convergence improvements (PIC being one) in XR that you
won't get in IOS.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:12, Mark Wheadon m...@currybeast.co.uk wrote:
What has been people's experience of Cisco IOS XR on
I wouldn't expect DWDM/Trasmission gear to have that kind of impact. That
equipment doesn't have that kind of intelligence. It has to be the end
equipment.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 03:50, Alexander ecra...@hotmail.com wrote:
Tim,
I am willing to bet that DWDM/transmission eqmt in between is
Bad analogy since the CRS has a SIP-800.
The MSC is the routing engine. The PLIM is the physical interfaces only.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:15, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Pratap Reddy wrote:
Hi,
As per Cisco's documentation Multi Services Card should
of the AP and watch the progress bar go.
Have a good day,
Aaron
---
Aaron Childs
Assistant Director, Networking
Westfield State College
http://www.wsc.ma.edu/it/
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew
1+ Solarwinds.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol
Sent: Thursday, 22 April 2010 8:35 PM
To: Ziv Leyes; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Backup Software
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Andrei-Marius Radu andr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I think that Cisco is saying you should use different carries because
if you have 3-4 3G cards with services from the same carrier all those
3G cards will associate with the same wireless phone cell and
192.168.254.1-192.168.254.254 mask 255.255.255.0
!
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Aaron.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e
behavior as described.
I would appreciate any suggestions on how to resuscitate this thing or
additional steps to verify it is indeed a faulty hardware issue.
Thanks,
Aaron
[1] http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/ts/fn/200/fn27595.html
___
cisco-nsp mailing
consuming.
Good Luck!
Aaron
---
Aaron Childs
Assistant Director, Networking
Westfield State College
http://www.wsc.ma.edu/it/
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf Of Sony Scaria [sony.sca...@gmail.com]
Sent
You need 1. The second DRP would be standby if so desired.
In your example you should be able to get away with 2.
Your RPs still handle overall system management.
Aaron
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:06, My Name denac...@gmail.com wrote:
Is any one running SDR on the CRS platform? Are there any
So, what is the difference in output from doing exec-on vs attach?
You are still connecting via the same method.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 14:07, e ninja eni...@gmail.com wrote:
Antonio,
You should *never* troubleshoot fabric errors with *any* exec-on commands.
They run over the fabric that
What is the HW on both ends? Possible one has a bug that is causing
headaches.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:51, Andy Saykao
andy.say...@staff.netspace.net.au wrote:
Hi Alex,
1/ When mpls ip is ON on both Gi4/0/1 and Gi0/2 - I can not ping from
PE2 PE1 BUT I can ping from PE1 PE2. That's my
Only if the BW or quality of the 2 networks is an issue. Asymmetrical
routing happens a lot in the internet.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:10, RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina r.tah...@moov.mg
wrote:
Hi All,
I'm connected to 2 upstreams, is there any performance issue if upload from
192.168.1.0/24
It is normal to have a CSC in standby mode. If something goes wrong with the
other CSC, it takes over.
Step 1 - Gather data before making any changes
term length 0- so you don’t have to hit enter
show log
show tech
There isn't a version that you can do that.
Aaron
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 16:01, Eduard Gheorghiu edigheorg...@gmail.comwrote:
William, can you give an example of two XR versions that you can migrate
between without reloading the whole box? I would like to try it in the lab
in order to see
of in-service upgrade. However, it
looks like it just applies to SMUs. And even then, the SMUs might take
out the box.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron dudep...@gmail.com wrote:
There isn't a version that you can do that.
Aaron
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 16:01, Eduard Gheorghiu edigheorg
Agreed, but I think he was pointing out the fact that it's not routers
that have this problem, it's c-routers :).
-Aaron
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Scott Granados wrote:
Better worded, a common issue with vendor C is that they have
processors that the interfaces can't keep up with. Other vendors
Try boot [device]:[image file name]
---
Aaron Childs
Assistant Director, Networking
Westfield State College
http://www.wsc.ma.edu/it/
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf Of Renelson Panosky
I gave up on calling TAC around 5 years ago. All of my TAC cases are handled
via e-mail (yea, I know it wasn't an option in your case) but I too have gotten
sick of trying to understand their engineers. I agree with William's comment
about the evaluation.
---
Aaron Childs
Assistant
Yes it would be preferable not to have dodgy hardware! But we have to
put up with it for a little while longer.
Thanks for those suggestions guys. Since I already have a telnet perl
script I will mod that to do the ping beforehand.
Thanks,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Pete S
commands. I may have to use our network monitoring app to run the
script. Could Cacti do this?
Thanks for any suggestions.
Aaron.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should
Open a tac case.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 00:55, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
I'm getting below error on GSR 12416 ALARM CARD -
IOS 12.0(32)SY6
WARNING: Unknown MBUS agent controller type, slot 24
Contact your technical support
representative.Please advise
sh
I use a script that logs on to the ASA runs a cmd and exports the
result as a data source within cacti. It works quite well for overall
avg statistics.
Sent from my iPod Touch.
On 06/08/2009, at 8:56 PM, Bagosi Rómeó bagosi.ro...@iqsys.hu wrote:
Loopback interfaces do not go down, so I'm not sure what benefit you are
getting besides the ability to blackhole the 10.10.10.0/24 if the ethernet
goes down.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:09, Michael Ulitskiy mulits...@acedsl.com wrote:
Hello,
Guys, are there any drawbacks of doing the
So you don't want to use another IP for loopback. Sorry, misunderstood.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:29, Aaron dudep...@gmail.com wrote:
Loopback interfaces do not go down, so I'm not sure what benefit you are
getting besides the ability to blackhole the 10.10.10.0/24 if the ethernet
goes down
about a year ago and it has been totally peachy except
for some random crashes that were fixed in SXH4. With a pair of 3750G's
top of rack, I say good riddance to STP!
Aaron Spitz
Network Analyst
Cascade Healthcare Community
aksp...@cascadehealthcare.org
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp
Yes and yes.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dracul
Sent: Monday, 27 July 2009 3:35 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-L
Hi All,
I can't seem to find more
reduce the MTU in those locations or I think you could
also restrict the large VLAN from being sent on the trunk
--
Aaron Millisor
Michael Robson wrote:
I have a 6509 (with Sup720-3B) that contains 2 x WS-X6704-10GE blades
where I am trying to set the MTU to be 1504 on each of these interfaces
Looks like a fabric problem.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 14:34, Chris Lane clane1...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I have a GSR 12008 with 2 GRP-B route processors. Running
gsr-k4p-mz.120-32.S11.bin
My GRP failed over about 45 minutes ago to the backup in Slot1 from Slot0.
I keep getting this in my
No one said redistribute BGP into your IGP.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 02:19, Nick 'tarantul' Novikov taran...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Aarondudep...@gmail.com wrote:
You must be using something else besides BGP. You need static, RIP, IGRP,
EIGRP, ISIS, or OSPF to get
You must be using something else besides BGP. You need static, RIP, IGRP,
EIGRP, ISIS, or OSPF to get your routes into the table. BGP cannot do it
alone.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 05:28, Robert Boyle rob...@tellurian.com wrote:
At 02:55 AM 7/3/2009, Ian Henderson wrote:
Nick 'tarantul' Novikov
It is a 6500 with a SUP2 however other extended ACL's are showing
matches with each ACE.
The traffic must be traversing this interface as it is the only way to
route out the subnet.
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun
If it is an OOB system and it works why not?
Aaron
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:25, Gustavo Rodrigues Ramos
gust...@nexthop.com.br wrote:
Is this suppose to be a good thing? (not patching your systems for
almost 10 years?)...
Gustavo.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Nic McCartneyn
Hi Renelson,
What's the configuration register set to? (sh boot) once you're in IOS. 0x0
will bring you to rommon everytime, 0x2102 will boot the sup using the config
file.
Aaron
-
Aaron Childs
Assistant Director, Networking
Westfield State College
http://www.wsc.ma.edu
nothing more than doing mpls. Actually a little less since you don't have
ldp going
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 09:55, Chris Fournier chris.fourn...@dal.ca wrote:
Does anyone use L2TPv3 over a gig link, and what is the performance
overhead introduced? I've seen some numbers at the Cisco website,
What does that have to do with L2TPv3?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:09, Ge Moua moua0...@umn.edu wrote:
I've done testing for both:
* no encryption: ~ 980Mb
* encryption ~ 240 Mb
Performance dependent on router platform (in my case 7203 w/ NSE-100)
Encryption was on 7206 w/ NPE-G1 VAM2+
601 - 700 of 884 matches
Mail list logo
