Effective human capability redundancy does not persist as a stable
status inside of any discreet organization.
Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
On 2/8/23 16:45, Aaron wrote:
i think the problem is they let the good ones go.
That is a trend currently affecting our industry - mostly because
Thanks for responding. I was looking for a controller like command to
see maybe there were some malformed frames or something, but couldnt
find one on this platform.
Saku Ytti wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 02:06, Joe Maimon via cisco-nsp
wrote:
I have a vendor trying to turn up a 10gb
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
Make the port a routed port (= ingress packets go nowhere), set up
a SPAN session, find out what sort of packets are coming in (broacast,
multicast, unknown-unicast) and how many of them. Adjust limits,
as ytti said.
Interesting approach, even if not sure it will
I have a vendor trying to turn up a 10gb link from their juniper mx to a
cisco 4900M, using typical X2 LR.
The link was being upgraded from a functioning 1gb. Same traffic.
Even with switchport mode trunk and switchport allowed vlan none, with
input counters in single digits, storm control
James Bensley wrote:
I thought that IRB did use CEF on the ISR-G2s?
Cheers,
James.
On software routers, even CEF enabled features do not compare well with
the most optimal and optimized routing operation flows, which is
essentially IP in Ethernet interface, un-encapsulated, unencumbered
Adam Straws on wrote:
You have IP redirects disabled?
Much better. thank you.
Joe
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Adam Straws on wrote:
You have IP redirects disabled?
On the face of it, that sounds irrelevant. But I suppose you mean that
having that enabled can cause unwanted forwarding path/punting, so
turning that off is what I am trying now.
Thanks much!
Joe
I seem to be running across this frequently, where a sup720 hairpins a
route out the same vlan interface to another sup720 there is a fair bit
of packet loss.
Am I missing some magic mls command to make that go away?
Help, advice, tips all appreciated.
Best,
Joe
Bottom line.
c3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE9.bin is bad news.
c3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE6.bin is not.
Joe
Joe Maimon wrote:
FYI
Upon recovery from errdisable after port-security violation the switch
crashes and upon reboot displays the below.
Verified on multiple switches in the 3550
FYI
Upon recovery from errdisable after port-security violation the switch
crashes and upon reboot displays the below.
Verified on multiple switches in the 3550 line and that it does not
occur with 12.2(44), other versions being looked into.
*Mar 1 00:02:01: %PLATFORM_CAT3550-1-CRASHED:
Anyone know if this is supported? I seem to be running across many
instances where only the RTP streams do not obey local policy routing
and instead follow the routing table.
Since they usually work anyways (unexpected source addresses
notwithstanding) I have not figured out exactly how
I dont think these are normal numbers, happening on bunch of similar
configuration routers.
r1#sh proc mem so
Processor Pool Total: 362681452 Used: 124296132 Free: 238385320
I/O Pool Total: 33554432 Used:3254704 Free: 30299728
Transient Pool Total: 16777216 Used: 364668
Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/30/2013 08:23 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
All,
Having a similar situation here. Hoping to get more feedback then Phil
ever did.
Is there a way through console only to worm back into the
SP/rommon/reset?
I can boot an old msfc image on the RP (hybrid mode with both SP
Phil Mayers wrote:
On 12/08/13 15:14, Andriy Bilous wrote:
I suspect you would need to sync config-registers on both. In some
circumstances when SP fails to boot, chassis would program 'halt on
boot' on RP to prevent infinite reset cycling (most electrical failures
happen on reset).
Erm...
All,
Having a similar situation here. Hoping to get more feedback then Phil
ever did.
Is there a way through console only to worm back into the SP/rommon/reset?
I can boot an old msfc image on the RP (hybrid mode with both SP and RP
running IOS), but havent figured out anything further yet.
Joe Pruett wrote:
3. not really 12 vs 15, but i have never really been able to figure out
what the 'service provider' or 'sp services' feature set really means.
mpls seems to be only in the sp side, but lots of other features are
removed from sp compared to my ipsec variant. i guess by
What exactly does Support mean? I just cannot believe the following fits
the definition.
Hello Joe,
My name is J*** C and I’m the manager of the Routing Protocols team
within Cisco TAC. I’m contacting you on behalf of J*** M* who is the
owner of this SR.
After reviewing the case
.
You should also talk to the DM aka Duty Manager and they can work to resolve
the issue.
- Jared
On Dec 19, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
What exactly does Support mean? I just cannot believe the following fits the
definition.
Hello Joe,
My name is J*** C and I’m the manager
, Joe Maimon wrote:
What exactly does Support mean? I just cannot believe the following
fits the definition.
Hello Joe,
My name is J*** C and I’m the manager of the Routing Protocols
team within Cisco TAC. I’m contacting you on behalf of J*** M*
who is the owner of this SR.
After
Once you get off the upgrade train it can be difficult to get back on.
Joe
Mike wrote:
On 12/04/2012 12:51 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:08:20PM -0800, Mike wrote:
If it helps, my
current running version is c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRD8 while
the version
All,
FYI, yet another occurrence of Cisco TAC coming to the conclusion that
yes it does not work, and no, they dont have to fix it, because they
have decided that it is not supported.
Is it an unreasonable expectation to expect product features to
interoperate unless clearly stated that
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:05:50AM -0400, Joe Maimon wrote:
Is it an unreasonable expectation to expect TAC support contracts to
deliver results and resolutions instead of yet another thing we wont
support?
But they *do* deliver results. Documentation gets updated
Hey All,
I am looking for some experience or information regarding this feature,
which allows you to apply qos service policies across diverse vlan
subinterfaces, by using a class matching the vlan tags on the parent
interface.
The feature seems to work on software platforms (7200
Spencer Barnes wrote:
Hello,
I can change the g0/0 interface to 10.0.128.66 255.255.255.252 and assign the
other interface g0/1 10.0.128.96 255.255.255.224 but then I lose a bunch of
external IPs.
Only with proxy-arp.
Your provider has put that subnet on the wire. Seems like they want
Joe Maimon wrote:
Hey All,
I would greatly appreciate it if somebody would point me to the release
notes for the change I see in 15.1 where BGP neighbor route-map
configurations happen in real time, without needing any clearing, soft
or otherwise.
Much obliged.
Best,
Joe
So I opened
Have them setup an additional multihop ebgp setup that you can funnel to
a disjoint route server so that you can examine what exactly is in their
full table.
Thats a good way to find the rfc1918 prefixes and customer routes and
more specific peer routes that really dont belong there.
Or
You can run latest 151 on npe-400
Why dont you try that instead of going from one outdated ios to another?
Joseph Mays wrote:
Also, just as a sanity check --
I cannot find a listing for separate ram for the IOS. Does the NPE-400
set aside memory for the IOS load from the main memory? And if
originating from the router itself.
BTW, the reason I need this to work is the router has a couple FXS ports
in it. None of the dial-peer stuff works under the current
configuration.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Maimon [mailto:jmai...@ttec.com]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 1:08 PM
To: Bill
Use some nat if you want to source traffic from the router and have it
attempt to use the unrouted address and still work.
Of course, you could start hard configuring which address various router
initiated traffic sourced from, but this is a much more complete approach.
ip access-list
Odds are you have non routed address on the wan interface.
Bill wrote:
Dear Cisco gurus,
I have the following simple config for a frame-relay T1 on Megapath's
network:
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x (publicly addressable /29)
duplex auto
speed auto
!
Hey All,
I would greatly appreciate it if somebody would point me to the release
notes for the change I see in 15.1 where BGP neighbor route-map
configurations happen in real time, without needing any clearing, soft
or otherwise.
Much obliged.
Best,
Joe
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
I've noticed WS-C2970G-24TS actually 1,5U, while other model just 1U. So
I wonder if there any overheating issues?
The physical design appears to be the same as 3550-12G and some of the 3750.
The extra height is taken up by the PS and 2 fans which are on their own
Get a 2950 or even a 3524XL, use vlans and subinterfaces.
Use BGP if available.
Otherwise, if you are already using NAT, then this should work fine.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/12_3x/12_3xe/feature/guide/dbackupx.html
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8313
If you need
Hey All,
GTS. I believe it is inferior to any other policy-map that can get its
bandwidth direct from the interface or layer2 configuration. GTS is for
a fallback, for logical interfaces, for interfaces that do not have any
other way of controlling and signaling available bandwdith.
I have found that using ip sla http method to be much more reliable and
configurable for my purposes.
Joe
Ziv Leyes wrote:
As promised, I report back, sorry for the delay...
I can confirm that this method worked fine for me!
The only captcha that I had (I've forgotten about it and took me a
Nick Hilliard wrote:
So, C1800 series routers nominally support a maximum of 128M external
flash (CF). Will 256M flash cards work at all, or will they do something
silly like refusing to boot?
128M CF cards have become less easy to get these days, and I'm not
inclined to pay a discounted $700
Any ideas on how to get a LAC to obey
aaa accounting update periodic 5
Its just sending floods. I have had to turn off accounting.
Getting L2TP lac to use specific aaa methods seems to be problematic as
well.
Thanks,
Joe
___
cisco-nsp mailing
I would stay far far away from the 2 port FE port adapters, no matter
what they say on them.
I would stick with VIP2-50 (or higher) with 128DRAM and only port
adapters that work well in there. Only VIP2-50 (or better) and RSP in
the chassis. Nothing else.
Use a cheap catalyst switch like
Real world I would not expect any more than roughly the same throughput
through a 7500 RSP4 with VIP2-50 as you will an NPE-400.
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Joe Maimon wrote:
If you are shopping the used market, you may be better off with the 7200
series. The 7500 isnt worth the juice it sucks
A recent bootflash image will boot system images from ATAPI/IDE (normal)
flash, and will work with cf+pc card adapter up to at least 1gb size
(personal experience)
rt01#sh bootflash:
-#- ED type --crc--- -seek-- nlen -length-
-date/time- name
1 .. image
, SN: 21850522
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Joe Maimon wrote:
A recent bootflash image will boot system images from ATAPI/IDE (normal)
flash, and will work with cf+pc card adapter up to at least 1gb size
(personal experience)
This applies to the RSP4 too? Not just the RSP4+?
Peace... Sridhar
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:28:48PM -0400, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Is there any way to get a PA-FE-TX to autonegotiate duplex?
No. The PA-FE-TX and the 7200-IO-FE just don't do duplex negotiation.
This is about the only bit of hardware that still needs forcing of
I sure hope you have better luck than I did.
http://www.mail-archive.com/cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg20125.html
steven.glog...@swisscom.com wrote:
hi all
just a short question (related to a quite new feature from cisco).
with the new cisco ASR software (15.0(1)S - released some days ago)
Mike wrote:
Howdy,
This isn't exactly cisco-centric, but it's certainly related operationally.
I operate a county wide isp network and I have about 15 different pops.
I equip each with APC700/1400's and with XR battery packs, with the goal
being around 8 hours of runtime in the event of a
thing like eigrp stub
connected :)
-
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
-
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joe Maimon
Sent
, Joe Maimon jmai...@ttec.com
mailto:jmai...@ttec.com wrote:
Perhaps something like this shows what I ran into better - I'll have
to try and see if I can build it in a lab.
The CE would not see the connected routes of the other CE's, unless
a network statement is used instead
Hey All,
Seems like I have run into a difficulty where CE#1 external EIGRP routes
(redistribute connected/redistribute static) are learned by PE#1,
redistributed to PE#2, but not redistributed to CE#2
CE - PE, EIGRP
PE - PE, MPLS/BGP
The workaround is to use network statements, making the
of the CCO document ?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/fteipece.html#wp1027175
Shimol Shah
On 5/17/10 2:57 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Hey All,
Seems like I have run into a difficulty where CE#1 external EIGRP routes
(redistribute connected/redistribute static
Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
The problem is that the session stays active. I want the session to be
lost. I believe the rules should be adhered to a bit more strictly.
The session DOES NOT stay active. The phone is stupid. It should have realized
there's no reply and restart the session.
With
Hey All,
So as is commonly talked about, I have seen a number of end user sites
with simple redundancy service using IOS routers.
Multiple lines, coulds be the same provider, could be different
providers, no dynamic routing, different source addresses, uRPF/SAV at
the provider(s) is to be
-
From: Joe Maimon [mailto:jmai...@ttec.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 5:06 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] CPE with tracking redundancy and long lived (UDP) nat
sessions
Hey All,
So as is commonly talked about, I have seen a number of end user sites
with simple redundancy service using
Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
Obviously the router does NOT check the ip nat rules if it gets a match in
the NAT translation table. This behavior makes sense; if you'd change the NAT parameters
of a live session, you'd lose the session anyway.
The problem is that the session stays active. I want
the key is
whether the flash is referred to as slotX or diskX. if the nomenclature
is slotX it uses a proprietary disk format which cannot be read by an
external reader.
to format CF card for use with older system
format slot0:
Joe Maimon wrote:
ML wrote:
Are the alternate CF cards formatted
Marko Milivojevic wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 04:00, Joe Maimonjmai...@ttec.com wrote:
Apparently, bpdufilter leaks sometimes on some switches, and I have
the packet traces to prove it. The switches are probably not supported,
so replacements are likely in order.
Did you have it enabled
Bill Blackford wrote:
Do you have any details?
Models? Code vers?
-b
3524XL, 12.0(5)WC17
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Marko Milivojevic wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 04:00, Joe Maimonjmai...@ttec.com wrote:
Apparently, bpdufilter leaks sometimes on some switches, and I have
the packet traces to prove it. The switches are probably not supported,
so replacements are likely in order.
To clarify, it only
Apparently, bpdufilter leaks sometimes on some switches, and I have the
packet traces to prove it. The switches are probably not supported, so
replacements are likely in order.
Anyone have an opinion of which cisco switches/IOS are guaranteed not to
leak through bpdufilter?
So this happily running router executes a write mem, which archives a
copy to the CF card.
Then it hangs and doesnt come back.
Hard reset of the router doesnt read the CF card and boots the boot
helper instead or just hangs.
ROMMON cant read the CF card, a 256MB. Cant read a new 1G card.
ML wrote:
Are the alternate CF cards formatted correctly for your platform?
Probably. However, IOS doesnt seem to think there is any card there or
worse, it hangs upon insert.
The original CF card may have gone bad but if you're sure the other CF
cards are OK then they may be formatted
Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2009-12-24 17:51, Joe Maimon wrote:
The original CF card may have gone bad but if you're sure the other CF
cards are OK then they may be formatted wrong.
The card is fine, tested in external reader. They are all fine.
The CF slot of NPE-G1 is very picky about CF
Jay Hennigan wrote:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright
scary: http://www.west.net/~jay/images/cisco-wants-root.png
Enhanced downloads, brought to you by the same people who brought
Probably would help to know what IO controller and NPE you have, what
image is the bootloader, where and what image you are trying to boot.
Not always can a 7200 boot directly of ide flash.
Do you have any configuration, such as boot statements?
Mikisa Richard wrote:
Hi all,
I have an issue
We are having a problem where routes originated by the customer because
of their backup paths are preventing the mpls bgp routes from being
installed and used on the PE.
Customer has an eigrp routed network.
We are hosting a bgp mpls network for the customer.
At the Customer's HQ PE router,
I am testing a turnkey CPE solution combining T1, SDSL, ADSL and PRI
handoff to customer PBX, with the 1751 transcoding SIP to PRI channels.
A CPE I am testing with a WIC-1SHDSL-V2 doesnt seem to be training
properly. The controller continues to report
DSL firmware download in progress,
Raymond, Steven wrote:
Have found the least bugs in SRD1, but non-cisco bgp neighbors sometimes require the use
of hidden command neighbor x.x.x.x dont-capability-negotiate or the session
won't restore.
I recall being on the other end of that one. Good tip.
-
From: Luan Nguyen [mailto:l...@netcraftsmen.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:44 PM
To: 'Joe Maimon'; 'cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Route redistribution and selection
You might want to check this link out:
http://wiki.nil.com/Multihomed_MPLS_VPN_sites_running_EIGRP
Regards
I view the rpr feature as completely useless in the real world.
Cold spare are way more effective.
The last time I had a rp failure, it was fixed by yanking one and
leaving the other.
In other words, odds are it causes more issues than it resolves.
Just added complexity for a box where its
ip per-packet load-sharing on single ethernet interface with multiple
iBGP routes installed to different nodes on that ethernet interface.
Software router, 12.3
Does not seem to be balancing. Is this supposed to work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Of Joe Maimon
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 22:29
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] ip per-packet load-sharing on single interface
ip per-packet load-sharing on single ethernet interface with multiple
iBGP routes installed to different nodes on that ethernet interface.
Software router, 12.3
Does
Sam Stickland wrote:
Roland Dobbins wrote:
But even more than that, putting your public-facing DNS (or any other
kind of server) behind a firewall is a very serious architectural
mistake; firewalls in front of public-facing servers provide no
security value whatsoever, and degrade the
Tim Durack wrote:
Amen to that.
I've played around with the various loopback strategies, including
using a gre tunnel that originates/terminates on the same PE. It
worked, but didn't seem like a scalable solution.
A dot1q trunk between two ports (if your not using a switch platform as
Hey,
I am having the same issue with a I/O controller, I have been trying
different combinations of IOS, but I cant seem to get this resolved.
Do you have c7200-boot-mz.120-21.ST.bin ?
Thanks,
Joe
FreeLSD wrote:
btw, seems 122-14.S15 and 122-18.S10 have broken format for bootflash:
and
Running 124T to take advantage of per vrf bgp router id so that the
router can have loopback bgp connections.
However, route-reflector-client is not taking effect, the neighbor
reports denied CLUSTER_LIST loop.
Apparently cluster-id needs to be vrf aware as well for this to work.
Is this in
Assuming you use a radius server that can place its accounting data in a
sql server, this should work fairly well for you
http://www.jmaimon.com/freeradius/mrtg-radsql/mrtg-radsql.tar.gz
M Usman Ashraf wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Just wanted to plot MRTG for customers whose CPE has no SNMP support
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
Mike wrote on Monday, February 09, 2009 00:28:
No.
I am trying to ensure that if the router ever emits icmp messages like
'destination host unreachable', 'icmp frag needed' and the like, that
I'm using a public routed ip and not some random flavor of the
Jen Linkova wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:47 AM, chloe K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ When I boot up the switch, the switch can be accessed by console without
password in user mode
ls it normal?
Absolutely. It's a default configuration which allows you to access
the switch and
Nathan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe this isn't simple! I just want to change the PVC on
the [expletive] ATM cells and push them back the same way they came,
how can that be so difficult?
Are you looking for the local switching
Peter Rathlev wrote:
Hi,
The traffic that doesn't get encrypted comes from a VRF Lite
subinterface on the back of the 7200. This VRF has a static 0/0 route
with a global next hop, and the global table has a static route pointing
the other way.
Sure would make things simpler if inter-vrf
David Barak wrote:
I don#39;t have the link in front of me, but I remember a document describing
the 3825 as working well for a partial DS3, and the 3845 as working for a full DS3.
I believe thats with all features such as nat, acl, fw, ipsec, ids
turned on.
Also, the ESW modules have
Hey all,
I am trying to get a new range of IP addresses on a asa/pix to work for
vpn clients.
Doesnt seem to work.
Can anyone share any tips?
Thanks,
Joe
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
.
Except one is actually the ASA's outside interface address and the other
isnt.
Thanks,
Joe
Christian Koch wrote:
can you elaborate? do you mean create a pool of ip's for ravpn users to
grab from?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Joe Maimon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Garry wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something here, but what's the right way of routing
between VRF and non-VRF interfaces?
In my opinion, by being able to define a physical or logical interface
between them.
Which you can currently, at cost of handling the packet twice. Which is
silly, but
Deepak Jain wrote:
Justin Shore wrote:
Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
loopback or another interface (usually a static route of last resort to
the loopback address/interface).
loopback or null?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Christian wrote:
I've had to deal with the same scenario on multiple occasions
It comes down to if we give customer access to the router, then the
managed service disappears - as it defeats the purpose of managed services
- if they wish to obtain control then let them buy the router from you
Hey All,
On a 3845 with 4 VWIC-2MFT-T1 wics.
3 on the engine blade, one in a network module.
One day IOS boots up with cookie errors, VWIC on NM is unrecognized.
Reload, it comes back. However, T1 on that VWIC comes up green, but line
protocol stays down.
T1 works fine in other VWIC,
Jason Berenson wrote:
Greetings,
We just got a new Covad DS3 and ordered an end T1 as frame relay. The
backhaul is ATM. Here's my network:
Covad will perform FRF ATM conversion for you. You just take the pvc and
do your ip routing on it.
Now if you want a multilink configuration,
John Kougoulos wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Eric Cables wrote:
The above, however, doesn't seem to work in some cases. Users as these
sites complain of intermittent connectivity problems, which seem to be
solved rather quickly by reducing the IP MTU, and configuring TCP
adjust-mss. I
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Does anyone know of a good discussion list for the RADIUS protocol?
You could try the freeradius list. You could also try the freeradius server.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 03:51:38PM +0200, Tor-Ivar Kristoffersen wrote:
Solution is to set a Cisco switch / router in front with 2 IF's.
A 3550 will do as well.
Get a reasonable supplyer. Forcing RFC1918 addresses on customer
transit links is no way to run an
Take an old ethernet card, copy its mac address and throw the ethernet
card out.
Use that mac address.
Realistically, the TELCO is actually asking for what to put in a layer 2
access list.
You want to be able to connect multiple routers, for example with an ATM
switch, so tell them a mac
to make one up and pass that along to them?
Thanks,
Paul
P.A -Original Message-
P.A From: Joe Maimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.A Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:50 AM
P.A To: Paul A
P.A Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
P.A Subject: Re: [c-nsp] mac address question
P.A
.
Thanks,
Paulo Amaral
MegaNet Communications
P: 508 646 0030
-
P.A -Original Message-
P.A From: Joe Maimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.A Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 3:50 PM
Dracul wrote:
Hi All,
I'm building a design that involves having a 2nd BGP router to act as a
backup if something goes wrong with the main router (heaven forbid). I have
two peers to different ISP's. There are some questions I have in mind:
a. Should my configuration involve route
Is there anything to the right of FIBER?
Charles Regan wrote:
I want to implement a spanning-tree configuration on my network to have
redundant path in case of hardware failure.
Currently my setup is like this:
FIBER TRAFFIC-SHAPER-BRIDGE CACHE-SERVER-BRIDGE 2811 ROUTER
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
Joe Maimon wrote on Monday, March 31, 2008 3:26 PM:
Anybody know exactly what this command does? Cant find it documented.
router(config)#ppp limit ccp ?
1-8000 Number of CCP sessions allowed
as the name suggests, one can limit the number of PPP
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:07:51AM -0400, Joe Maimon wrote:
- In theory, one virtual template can be used for all mlppp customers,
as they will establish seperate bundles with their endpoint
discriminators, correct?
Yes.
How do you protect against
Troy Beisigl wrote:
Hi all,
We are looking to do the setup shown below. Customer 1 has 3 locations (A, B
and C) and would like to be able to pass private traffic between all (WAN)
and would also like to get internet access as well. Two of those locations
will be DS1 circuits and the
Hey all,
Thought I would ping the list and try to benefit from the collective
experience.
- We show that testing can leave 15-30% bandwidth on the table per link,
should this be acceptable or should more troubleshooting be done?
- Is it really neccessary to utilize Mutltilink interfaces on
Is there any way to get the vxr to support analog dialup access using
pri t1's?
the group-range command doesnt seem to work on int group-async0
Thanks,
Joe
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008, Joe Maimon wrote:
Is there any way to get the vxr to support analog dialup access using
pri t1's?
IIRC, If there's no DSPs there's no analog dialup.
What about the MIX port adapters?
___
cisco-nsp
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
