Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber phone mode outbound calls issue

2015-11-24 Thread Ryan Huff
ash...@outlook.com Twitter: @ryanthomashuff<http://twitter.com/ryanthomashuff> LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff<http://linkedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff> Web ryanthomashuff.com<http://ryanthomashuff.com> From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber phone mode outbound calls issue

2015-11-24 Thread Ryan Huff
Date:11/24/2015 12:13 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Ryan Huff' ,cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Jabber phone mode outbound calls issue Hi Ryan, Thanks for the detailed response. Yes the issue is with Jabber clients and not the IP phones. The line itself which is shared with many

Re: [cisco-voip] Call Queue while hunting

2015-11-24 Thread Ryan Huff
What I have done in the past (admittedly, not the most elegant); as Brian mentions, is send the ingress call to a Call Handler in CUC via CTI Route Point to play the message and then set the after greeting action to transfer to the hunt pilot and use the CTI Route Point for the hunt pilot's

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber phone mode outbound calls issue

2015-11-24 Thread Ryan Huff
nthomashuff> LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff<http://linkedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff> Web ryanthomashuff.com<http://ryanthomashuff.com> From: abbas wali <abba...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 2:05 PM To: 'Ryan Huff'; cisco-voip@puck.net

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade failure...

2015-11-18 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Jonathan, Glad to hear a reboot on the publisher seems to have fixed your initial issue, I thought it might. You never know with reboots on those old MCS boxes though, so having a good DRS and recover plan prior is key. I suspect, and if you are so inclined, "show hardware" on the CLI of

Re: [cisco-voip] Restart CUIC

2015-11-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Here is a second (or third perhaps) opinion, for what it is worth. "You can't break broke". As Anthony said, you are not impacting call processing and the service restart will be transparent to your users, reporting users not withstanding, obviously. Original message From:

Re: [cisco-voip] Restart CUIC

2015-11-20 Thread Ryan Huff
tware. If not, repeat questions #1 and #2. ;) - Dan From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:34 PM To: jcolon...@gmail.com<mailto:jcolon...@gmail.com> Cc: Cisco VOIP <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA and Phone server selection

2015-11-19 Thread Ryan Huff
In your Expressway-C server, what do you have listed as your CUCM Neighbors? On Nov 19, 2015, at 6:27 AM, Matthew Collins > wrote: Hi All, It seems that our phone services Via MRA are somewhat intermittent, It seems that the clients are trying

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA and Phone server selection

2015-11-19 Thread Ryan Huff
rds Matthew From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: 19 November 2015 11:37 To: Matthew Collins <mcoll...@block.co.uk<mailto:mcoll...@block.co.uk>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MRA and Phone server s

Re: [cisco-voip] Call to Huntgroup drop when Group only contains csf

2015-11-22 Thread Ryan Huff
For the "Forward Hunt No Answer" setting on the hunt pilot did you select "Use Forward Settings of Line Group Member" or "Forward Unanswered Calls to Destination"? If you've selected "Use Forward Settings of Line Group Member", then an active line member will need to be present in the line

Re: [cisco-voip] Call to Huntgroup drop when Group only contains csf

2015-11-23 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Dan! Thanks for correcting me. For some reason I remembered it working differently? Anyway, my apologies to the list, I will work to improve [] . = Ryan = From: Daniel Pagan <dpa...@fidelus.com> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:39 AM To: Rya

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber phone mode outbound calls issue

2015-11-24 Thread Ryan Huff
I assume this is only with the Jabber clients and not IP phones as well? The annunciation message you're getting from Call Manager is typically reserved for when the calling device does not have access to the called device (or pattern). If you're confident that you're CSS/Partitions are

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA and Phone server selection

2015-11-19 Thread Ryan Huff
assigned to it? In CCM, what is the primary server advertised for CTI Control? Thanks, Ryan Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message From: Matthew Collins Date:11/19/2015 9:02 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] MRA

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS Disk Partition for C series

2016-01-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Andy, For the bare metal install I'd take a look at: https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/141976/how-install-esxi-ucs-servers Once ESXi is up and running, the DocWiki is always the goto for UC on UCS sizing and requirments ... etc - CUCM:

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS Disk Partition for C series

2016-01-08 Thread Ryan Huff
From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 8:54 AM To: Andy; cisco-voip voip list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCS Disk Partition for C series Hi Andy, For the bare m

Re: [cisco-voip] openSSH / SFT / DRS important FYI

2016-06-02 Thread Ryan Huff
_ From: "Ed Leatherman" <ealeather...@gmail.com<mailto:ealeather...@gmail.com>> To: "Ryan Huff" <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Cc: "cisco voip" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] PS-ALI DID Registration

2016-06-03 Thread Ryan Huff
Are you talking about Cox Communications being the telco (http://cox.com)? Thanks, Ryan On Jun 3, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Charles > wrote: Since this is a one-time data load, we are trying to avoid having to pay for a recurring portal

Re: [cisco-voip] PS-ALI DID Registration

2016-06-03 Thread Ryan Huff
is Ed. or public sector. Hope this helps, Ryan Thanks, Ryan On Jun 3, 2016, at 3:39 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Are you talking about Cox Communications being the telco (http://cox.com)? Thanks, Ryan On Jun 3, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Jona

Re: [cisco-voip] PS-ALI DID Registration

2016-06-03 Thread Ryan Huff
and if the LEC for your region IS Cox, then yes, they have an ALI database. Thanks, Ryan On Jun 3, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Assuming it's the same Cox ... they offer E911 as a residential product (https://www.cox.com

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

2016-06-06 Thread Ryan Huff
David, Here are my thoughts for what they be worth to ya ;) - Make sure the name is in the search scope (located in directory handler basics page). - Look at the voice recognition update schedule and see if you have any inactive periods. Maybe it was added and subsequently checked during an

Re: [cisco-voip] Add CPU on UC infrastructure

2016-05-26 Thread Ryan Huff
I would first answer your question, with a question of my own. Why do you need to add additional CPUs to your UC virtual? Thanks, Ryan Thanks, Ryan On May 26, 2016, at 4:33 PM, Alessandro Bertacco > wrote: Hi Guys, I

[cisco-voip] openSSH / SFT / DRS important FYI

2016-06-01 Thread Ryan Huff
This is an important FYI for anyone that uses OpenSSH, and by extension any software that uses OpenSSH. A coworker and I discovered this issue today by way of using Linux with OpenSSH as a SFTP>DRS target for UC Manager. Applied to context; in the new OpenSSH 7.2p2, which you'll likely run

Re: [cisco-voip] openSSH / SFT / DRS important FYI

2016-06-01 Thread Ryan Huff
bit modulus. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:10 PM, Ryan Huff <<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: This is an important FYI for anyone that uses OpenSSH, and by extension any software that uses OpenSSH. A coworke

Re: [cisco-voip] R: Add CPU on UC infrastructure

2016-05-29 Thread Ryan Huff
pgrade to V11 from V10.5, and moving Virtual Machine to ESXi5 to ESX6, during boot and during service start up CPU are always 100%, and booting Up are Slow as Old Snail!! Note that Virtul Machine now Run on SSD Disk Storage!! AB Da: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Inviato: gioved? 26 maggi

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.0.1 bug watch

2016-06-23 Thread Ryan Huff
nd the CPU will go through the roof. As far as I know, this is not a documented defect, because the compatibility matrix specifically states which browsers are supported. So in theory, you shouldn't be using a browser that causes this issue in the first place. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:44 PM,

Re: [cisco-voip] Filtering out specific number from Jabber

2016-01-11 Thread Ryan Huff
com/ryanthomashuff> LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff<http://linkedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff> Web ryanthomashuff.com<http://ryanthomashuff.com> From: Matthew Collins <mcoll...@block.co.uk> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 5:16 AM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puc

Re: [cisco-voip] Filtering out specific number from Jabber

2016-01-11 Thread Ryan Huff
/ryanthomashuff.com> From: Matthew Collins <mcoll...@block.co.uk> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 7:57 AM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Filtering out specific number from Jabber Hi Ryan, Thanks for getting back to me. It’s the visibly t

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS C Series CIMC Password Change

2016-01-13 Thread Ryan Huff
LOL, thats the sort of thing that could have you cussing during a 2am remote cut. Thanks for the heads up brother! Thanks, = Ryan = Email: ryanthomash...@outlook.com Spark: ryanthomash...@outlook.com Twitter: @ryanthomashuff LinkedIn:

[cisco-voip] Cisco Spark API

2016-01-18 Thread Ryan Huff
Hello everyone, I'm not sure of this audience who is, a.) Aware of what Cisco Spark is, and/or b.) cares what it is so I am sending this multicast in hopes that it finds all who do know/care on the list. For those interested in using the Spark API and learning what you can do with it; I

Re: [cisco-voip] Trouble Getting 8831 to register

2016-06-27 Thread Ryan Huff
Hello Thomas, I have prepared a few thoughts for you below. * If auto-registration is disabled within the cluster, the device configuration has to be manually added into the cluster first. Without auto-registration or having been manually added first, registration attempts will result

Re: [cisco-voip] MOH with CUBE

2016-02-09 Thread Ryan Huff
How does one pee on an onion? (clearly, I know you meant PEELING and I am in no way grammar police). I just got a sincere and much needed chuckle from this, "In my experience, turning up SIP services is like peeing an onion ...". All in good fun Anthony ;) Sent from my iPhone On Feb 9,

Re: [cisco-voip] MOH with CUBE

2016-02-09 Thread Ryan Huff
ailing lists have their drawbacks, and editing a post after submitting it, is one of them. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: How does one pee on an onion? (clearly, I know you meant PEELING and I am in no way gram

Re: [cisco-voip] UPPERCASE lowercase host names

2016-02-11 Thread Ryan Huff
Matt, There have been cases (CWMS as you note), where lowercase is specifically required. I think UCCX may have some hostname casing stipulations as well. Couldn't find anything relevant in the BugKit (not to say it isn't there). That said, your recollection may be from advice/reading that

Re: [cisco-voip] FQDN removal

2016-01-29 Thread Ryan Huff
_ From: David Jengan <davidjen...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:56 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FQDN removal Hi Ryan, Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sorry I may not have been completely clear in the ask, wha

Re: [cisco-voip] Installation new phone firmware cop file installation

2016-01-29 Thread Ryan Huff
While you only need to do this on the tftp server; I've always considered applying to every node. That way, if I make node/tftp changes in the future I don't even have to take this in to consideration. Thanks, Ryan From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x Application Dial Rules - When do they get used?

2016-01-29 Thread Ryan Huff
on-prem WebEx Meeting server can use them too From: cisco-voip on behalf of Brian Meade Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 10:57 AM To: Ed Leatherman Cc: Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x Application

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco cucm 11 unable to login cli

2016-01-29 Thread Ryan Huff
Hey Claiton, It might be possible to rebuild cliCommands.xml file (if the is the actual issue) via the rescue disk. I'd open up a TAC case and have them take a look before rebuilding. My guess though, is that the node is toast. Is this on the back of an upgrade or a new install? Thanks,

Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID issue

2016-02-03 Thread Ryan Huff
You'll need to CFG the gateway as h.323 (at least for that FXO port). CLID doesn't work on FXO ports controlled by mgcpapp . You can run a "debug vpm port x/x/x" and that should show the calling name received on the FXO port, but if the port is under mgcpapp control, it won't pass the IE to

Re: [cisco-voip] FQDN removal

2016-01-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi David, Removing the DNS server entries alone from the cluster nodes, would not require a restart. Removing/changing the hostname/domain name of the nodes would; this carries its own set of risks and considerations with SBD and db replication. If you are doing that, please consult;

Re: [cisco-voip] Reporting in inactive endusers in CM

2016-02-27 Thread Ryan Huff
Ed, Everything I'm saying here is assuming you are UCOS >= 9.x; before 9 ALL LDAP or ALL local were the choices and you couldn't have blended users point being, the enduser status value had different implications. If you are looking for a way to passively monitor active accounts; run

Re: [cisco-voip] CWMS 2.0 ova file

2016-02-22 Thread Ryan Huff
Last I knew CWMS is delivered via USB fob with purchase of contract entitlement. May need to raise a case with GLO/TAC and get your AM involved. Thanks, Ryan Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Jorge Gonzalez wrote: > > Hi all. > > I have to install

Re: [cisco-voip] CWMS 2.0 ova file

2016-02-22 Thread Ryan Huff
Jorge, They are white USB sticks with green lettering on them; you should have two, one is for encrypted and the other is for unencrypted. They should be delivered in a similar style white envelope that the PAK certificates come in. Thanks, Ryan On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Matthew

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Call Park

2016-02-24 Thread Ryan Huff
e involved. I'll whip something up in UCCX as I don't think it'll be difficult, just was hoping someone had a sample script. Thanks. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: What is the primary reason for customer not

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Spark API

2016-01-19 Thread Ryan Huff
ony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 2:07 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco voip Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Spark API Thanks for sharing this Ryan. It's really cool stuff. Why do you think there is this surge in chat bot interest all of the sudden, whe

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing username/password/enable passwords for Cisco 2900 and 800 series routers

2016-01-21 Thread Ryan Huff
Just using this as a chance to plug the proliferation of Linux . CLI called "Terminator" http://gnometerminator.blogspot.com/p/introduction.html Fundamentally the same thing ... multiple sessions within the same application instance with the ability to group sessions and broadcast

Re: [cisco-voip] RTP ports used by phones

2016-01-19 Thread Ryan Huff
Ed, http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/10_0_1/CUCM_BK_T537717B_00_tcp-port-usage-guide-100/CUCM_BK_T537717B_00_tcp-port-usage-guide-100_chapter_01.html Could it be that you're seeing something from the ephemeral port range 32768 - 61000? Thanks, = Ryan =

Re: [cisco-voip] File Transfer in Jabber

2016-02-17 Thread Ryan Huff
Michael, Do you have binary floor control protocol (BFCP) enabled on both of the clients? Thanks, = Ryan = Email: ryanh...@outlook.com Spark: ryanh...@outlook.com Twitter: @ryanthomashuff LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff

Re: [cisco-voip] File Transfer in Jabber

2016-02-17 Thread Ryan Huff
nesday, February 17, 2016 16:09 To: Michael Voity <mvo...@uvm.edu<mailto:mvo...@uvm.edu>> Cc: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>; voip puck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] File Tran

Re: [cisco-voip] UPPERCASE lowercase host names

2016-02-11 Thread Ryan Huff
kedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff> Web ryanthomashuff.com<http://ryanthomashuff.com> From: avhollo...@gmail.com <avhollo...@gmail.com> on behalf of Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 11:32 AM To:

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router

2016-03-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Jose, You'll be doing essentially the same thing as the G2s; IOS-XE just changes up the syntax a bit. Have a look at: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/interfaces/NIM/software/configuration/guide/ConfT1E1NIM.html, that should get you started (pay particular attention to the

Re: [cisco-voip] No inbound call signaling

2016-03-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Jamie, Is there a plar on the voice port going somewhere you are not expecting maybe? Have you tried a new cable from the demarcation to the router? If the telco is using anti-tinkle circuits, you may need to play around with the ring in frequency. You may also need to adjust the dc-offset

Re: [cisco-voip] Failure during PCD readdress task...

2016-03-19 Thread Ryan Huff
I'm sure you verified that the reverse arpa lookup is also working for that forward FQDN? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:57 PM, Jonathan Charles > wrote: No change to domain... this was a PCD migration cluster... we are now changing the

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

2016-03-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Did you also install the root CA and all/any intermediaries leading up to the identity certificate on all nodes? As a matter of practice, I always start with the root and build my way out to the identity, on each node. Thanks, Ryan Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Anthony

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

2016-03-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Also, as Anthony mentions, the identity (server) certificate goes into tomcat and the root CA and intermediary CAs go into tomcat-trust. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Did you also install

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

2016-03-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Correct; tomcat-trust is the trust store where the trusted CA chain goes and then the server certificate goes in the tomcat category. Afterwards; you should only need a restart of tomcat services. However, if the nodes are having issues trusting one another within the cluster (assuming that

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

2016-03-19 Thread Ryan Huff
simply not uploaded to the Tomcat Trust? Or was the cert bad? On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com<mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com>> wrote: It was the root ca cert causing this. Thanks everyone for the input On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Ryan Hu

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco.com/go/tools

2016-04-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Just hit it from my phone: [image1.PNG] Thanks, Ryan On Apr 6, 2016, at 2:43 PM, Norton, Mike > wrote: Apologies for being slightly off-topic, but I know there are some folks here with connections to this URI. Anyone else have trouble

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard cert

2016-04-07 Thread Ryan Huff
posts saying that the wildcard certs would work I purchased the wild card cert. Just wondering how people got them to work. Thanks On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Jose, I believe what you want are multi server (SAN) cert

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5.2 "promote" subscriber

2016-04-13 Thread Ryan Huff
So the quick answer is no; once an HA node, always an HA node (as far as that CUC HA pair is concerned). Also, taking and running VM snapshots is not a supported for in UCOS (because as you mention, the longer the snapshot runs, the bigger it gets which can lead to resource issues). At this

Re: [cisco-voip] H323 call rejection using Translation Profile not working

2016-04-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Jeff, While I certainly would not want to usurp Sreekanth, since you stated you are using CUCME, there may be a much easier way for you to do this; telephony-service ! after-hours block pattern 1000 7-24 ! Thanks, Ryan On Apr 8, 2016, at 7:46 AM, Jeffrey Girard

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco and 911

2016-04-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Out of CUCM natively, but not automatically (which is what I think you want), through CDRs. Informacast Advanced Notification would be good for this requirement too. Thanks, Ryan On Apr 8, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Tim Kenyon > wrote: Does anyone know

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard cert

2016-04-07 Thread Ryan Huff
Jose, I believe what you want are multi server (SAN) certificates for tomcat. You specify the distribution when generating the CSR. Thanks, Ryan > On Apr 7, 2016, at 5:21 PM, Jose Colon II wrote: > > I have read a lot on forums that the digicert wildcard certs work

Re: [cisco-voip] Unusual UCOS installation condition - sanity check please

2016-03-21 Thread Ryan Huff
Excellent thought! However, changing the device ID in the MAC address yields the same result; still detects a duplicate IP address. Thanks, Ryan From: 秀王 <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:05 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco voip Subje

Re: [cisco-voip] Unusual UCOS installation condition - sanity check please

2016-03-21 Thread Ryan Huff
Just wanted to provide follow up on this for the list; The issue was in fact, Proxy ARP. Thanks, Ryan From: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:55 AM To: cisco voip Subject: Unusual UCOS installation condition - sanity

[cisco-voip] Unusual UCOS installation condition - sanity check please

2016-03-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Encountering the duplicate ip on eth0 installation error for UCOS. The IP is not actually duplicated on the segment though. My experience with this error is that it is usually right; in the sense that something is not compatible with UCOS in the network. What I'm not certain of, is what

Re: [cisco-voip] Max. Partitions supported by CUCM

2016-03-04 Thread Ryan Huff
Mohit, I don't believe there is a fixed number/limit of CSSs and partitions that you can have; just a limit of character length within the CSS (thereby limiting the number of partitions you can have within a CSS). v9 SRND:

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade woes

2016-03-02 Thread Ryan Huff
een in a degraded state since the upgrade? Can you show me the output (from the publisher); - utils diagnose module validate_network - show ntp status - show ntp server list Thanks, Ryan > On Mar 2, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > > I'd go through a quick check

Re: [cisco-voip] R: Upgrade IM version 9.1.2 to Version 11.0.1.10000-6

2016-03-04 Thread Ryan Huff
Alessandro, A couple of thoughts here; * Do you know if the nodes were in a healthy state prior to the upgrade? * What was the IM and presence version that you tried to upgrade to? (assuming 11.0.1.11900-4) * Is the 9.1.1 IM a HA pair or single node? * ?Did you allow the CUCM

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber and P-RTP-Stat

2016-03-04 Thread Ryan Huff
I couldn't find any documented answer but I definitely do not see it with my J4W 11.5.1 (and I am using media flow-around). Thanks, Ryan From: cisco-voip on behalf of Mark Holloway Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] R: Upgrade IM version 9.1.2 to Version 11.0.1.10000-6

2016-03-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Have you removed the previous CUCM IM processNode (CM Server) entries from CUCM? You'll need to remove the reference within CUCM to those non-migrated nodes, then add new entries. Thanks, Ryan On Mar 6, 2016, at 3:37 AM, Alessandro Bertacco

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade woes

2016-03-02 Thread Ryan Huff
I'd go through a quick checklist while calling in a severity 1 TAC case; - forward and reverse DNS for all cluster nodes (and resolving to the correct addresses) - verify the processNodes, if using hosts or fqdn, are correctly resolvable. This will prevent A Cisco DB from starting as well as

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade woes

2016-03-02 Thread Ryan Huff
http://ryanthomashuff.com> From: Andy Carse <andy.ca...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 2:27 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc: Ryan Huff; Cisco VoIP List Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade woes Yes I spotted that after I pasted, I'm not sure how it installed v9.1 with that stratum. I

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade woes

2016-03-02 Thread Ryan Huff
ashuff.com<http://ryanthomashuff.com> From: Andy Carse <andy.ca...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 2:10 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: Cisco VoIP List Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade woes .The upgrade was from 9.1.2 to 10.5.2.13900-12. There where some issues wit

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF digits not hitting Voice Gateway

2016-03-02 Thread Ryan Huff
Do these phones have access to MTP resources and if so, software resources or hardware resources? Also, I assume this is G.711, correct? Thanks, Ryan On Mar 2, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Aaron Banks > wrote: This problem has been resolved

Re: [cisco-voip] as built doc generation

2016-03-02 Thread Ryan Huff
: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:52 PM To: cisco voip Subject: [cisco-voip] as built doc generation What is everyone using to build as built docs nowadays? Variphy doesn't quite get everything I want to see and Up

[cisco-voip] as built doc generation

2016-03-02 Thread Ryan Huff
What is everyone using to build as built docs nowadays? Variphy doesn't quite get everything I want to see and Uplinx is nice but has some shortfalls IMO that never seem to get addressed. Anyone have other suggestions besides Variphy and Uplinx? I'd love to whitebox something but do not have

Re: [cisco-voip] as built doc generation

2016-03-02 Thread Ryan Huff
he sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Wednesday, March 0

Re: [cisco-voip] R: R: R: Upgrade IM version 9.1.2 to Version 11.0.1.10000-6

2016-03-07 Thread Ryan Huff
?2016 16:46 A: Alessandro Bertacco<mailto:bertacco.alessan...@alice.it> Cc: Ryan Huff<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Oggetto: Re: [cisco-voip] R: R: Upgrade IM version 9.1.2 to Version 11.0.1.1-6 How about under System

Re: [cisco-voip] Columbia CUBE to Claro outbound issue

2016-04-03 Thread Ryan Huff
ith UDP.) Nice suggestion though! Thanks! Hank From: "Horton, Jamin" <jamin.hor...@oneneck.com<mailto:jamin.hor...@oneneck.com>> Date: Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 22:11 To: "Hank.Keleher" <hank.kele...@us.didata.com<mailto:hank.kele...@us.didata.com>&g

Re: [cisco-voip] Columbia CUBE to Claro outbound issue

2016-04-02 Thread Ryan Huff
Are you always getting the same 404 "unallocated number" response? Thanks, Ryan > On Apr 2, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Hank Keleher (AM) > wrote: > > Greetings! > > Does anyone have a CUBE configuration that works with Claro based in Columbia > you can share with me?

Re: [cisco-voip] Constantly having db replication issues

2016-04-20 Thread Ryan Huff
nter is here, and that is where our DRS sftp server (and publisher) is located. Nothing is using DNS right now, all of the servers are entered into CUCM as IP addresses... this cluster has been around for years. It was upgraded from 7.BeforeMyTime to 8.6 to 10.0. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUCM 7 SMTP issue

2016-05-11 Thread Ryan Huff
Have you also made sure the IP address of CUCM is an allowed mail relay on your Exchange server? Thanks, Ryan On May 11, 2016, at 4:01 AM, Asim Mekki Basheer > wrote: we have Cisco CUCM 7 we configured SMTP to send email in certain Alert, the

Re: [cisco-voip] [cisco-VoIP] UCCE agents on wireless IP Communicator?

2016-05-11 Thread Ryan Huff
Many moons ago in a land called Ohio, I rescued a small agent base from doing this ... Aside from the obvious QOS and reliable connection issues; in that client's case the agents would also occasionally want to use the speakerphone function without a headset (PC Speaker / Mic) and without an

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Voice Training

2016-05-03 Thread Ryan Huff
ine and CollabCert are really the only two left in the game since ipExpert went off to crazy-town. ine's collab stuff hasn't been updated (that I know of) since Mark left so it's probably still fairly relevant (maybe a year or two old). If you're looking for some hands on al-la cart

Re: [cisco-voip] Authenticating sip trunk to ITSP from CUBE?

2016-05-04 Thread Ryan Huff
Nick, What are you binding SIP to? Thanks, Ryan > On May 4, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Nick Barnett wrote: > > I've never dealt with an authenticated SIP trunk before and I'm having some > issues. I was wondering if anyone has had a similar experience. I already > have 2 SIP

Re: [cisco-voip] call-forward

2016-05-04 Thread Ryan Huff
You could use the call-forward max-length configuration (applied under ephone-dn) and specify a length lower than the number of digits they are forwarding to. You could also remove the Call Forward All key from the soft key template and not make it an option on the phone. Thanks, Ryan On

Re: [cisco-voip] VG350 - SCCP controlled FXS Port - Provide MWI actual "light" on analog phone ?

2016-04-19 Thread Ryan Huff
If the FXS port is SCCP controlled you could try the supplementary service for AMWI and VMWI. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/voice/fxs/configuration/guide/15_1/fxs_15_1_cg_book/fxsamwivmwi.html Not sure if there is anything you can do for an h.323/mgcp port. Thanks, Ryan On Apr 19,

Re: [cisco-voip] Constantly having db replication issues

2016-04-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Nick. Let me ask you a few things; - How is the cluster laid out (how many nodes in the cluster and what nodes are in which DC)? - Are you using DNS and if so, where is the DNS server located and do you have redundant DNS in both DCs? - Where is your DRS server in relation to the cluster

Re: [cisco-voip] Hunt Pilot addition to existing hunt list fails with error

2016-07-25 Thread Ryan Huff
.11900-3. > > >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: >> How was the upgrade performed? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Erick Bergquist <erick...@gmail.com> wrote: >>

[cisco-voip] Industry Hi-Five

2016-07-22 Thread Ryan Huff
Hello everyone, I'll start by saying that since I have listened to this list, I've not seen this -so I am not sure if this is frowned upon by list maintainers or not (please unicast me if it is). I would like to give a virtual "Industry Hi-Five" to Aaron Banks for a job well done! Aaron and I

Re: [cisco-voip] Block call based on ANI and DNIS at the same time

2016-07-27 Thread Ryan Huff
ks, Ryan From: Telecom <telecom3...@me.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:24 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Block call based on ANI and DNIS at the same time I was able to get this working and I thank everyone for their he

Re: [cisco-voip] BUG - Cisco Jabber for Windows version 11.6.2

2016-07-19 Thread Ryan Huff
Alessandro, While I'm not aware of any similar behavior I have used J4W 11.6.2 (currently using the 11.7 beta) on my Windows VM and it seemed to work well for me; with regard to your problem description. J4W is one of the few things I use Windows for and I use Jabber a lot during the day, I'd

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

2016-07-11 Thread Ryan Huff
case it was either too faint or too hot for the Viking unit’s sensitivity. Didn’t make a difference. Thanks! Kevin From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Damisch, Kevin Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:14 AM To: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 7.0.2.10000-38 Kernal error

2016-06-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Bryant, Look for a USB keyboard / KVM dongle plugged in back of the chassis and unplug. You *may*, need to reboot the chassis to get the message out of the syslog since you likely do not have root to the OS. Reboot aside, it shouldn't be causing an impact to CUCM. Thanks, Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

2016-07-05 Thread Ryan Huff
-16 3:41 PM To: Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com<mailto:kevin.dami...@oneneck.com>>; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>; Wes Sisk (wsisk) <ws...@cisco.com<mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@pu

Re: [cisco-voip] 7941 phone issues

2016-06-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Bill, To fix the factory-reset 7941 phone (I'm assuming this means you used # + 123456789*0#), you'll need to first upgrade it to the intermediate 8.3(3), then 8.5(2), then 9.x. I wouldn't factory reset anymore of those older 79xx's. Here is a reference:

Re: [cisco-voip] 7941 phone issues

2016-06-30 Thread Ryan Huff
at the ip of the tftp server (your PC, in this case) - Boot the phone on this network and it should upgrade. Do this for all the incremental versions. Thanks, Ryan On 06/30/2016 10:36 AM, Ryan Huff wrote: Bill, To fix the factory-reset 7941 phone (I'm assuming this means you used # + 1

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

2016-06-30 Thread Ryan Huff
de will hear the suggestion, that it will understand the suggestion, or that it will comply. TLDR: disconnect signalling with analog POTS doesn’t really exist and thus sucks. -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: June-29-16 5:32 PM To: Wes Sisk

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

2016-06-30 Thread Ryan Huff
0-16 2:26 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller I’m not Wes but I’ll take a go at it... An FXO port is the essential

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

2016-06-29 Thread Ryan Huff
On the Cisco FXO port side, try "impedance 600r" under the voice port config. Essentially, what I believe you are up against, is a sine oscillation disagreement between the FXO port and the Viking. Thanks, Ryan On Jun 29, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Damisch, Kevin

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >