Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-08 Thread Art Clemons
I agree, but the studies were for adults. I don't believe the safety of rf exposure to young children over time is settled science. Wouldn't you be loath to accept such exposure as a PZB member only to find out 20 years down the road those kids are sick from it ?? Then you should really

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-02 Thread Larry Sacks
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser which costs money, and raises the total cost of healthcare in the U.S. On Jul 1, 2008, at 5:00 PM, rlsimon wrote: That's why most medical offices have an employee to do all that! -Original Message- From: Janaki Kuruppu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-02 Thread Tom Piwowar
It is both a good thing and a bad things as this will be a toll road and it will cost the public to use it until it is paid for. Next we outsource police, fire, and courts. It will be nice to simply pay to have my noisy neighbor arrested and more efficient to try cases by auction.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-02 Thread Tom Piwowar
Do you really want a system that drops out whenever it rains? So what is the problem? If you have bad service on my network my people will fix it. I know that parts of the network are old and up for replacement. Looks like I touched a raw nerve. People with wireless data plans should know

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Snyder, Mark (IT CIV)
I think that it was settled decades ago: no substantiated risk. Thank you, Mark Snyder -Original Message- From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rlsimon Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 5:36 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Here they lure you in with cheap/free phones and stick you with the service contract. Over in many other countries you pay mucho bucks up front for the phone then shop for your plan I guess that is why it is so desirable to have poor schools. If people could do some rudimentary math they

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
They do not have a multitude of carriers, and usually have a government monopoly, or one that is heavily subsidized by the government. Interesting logic. First we promote the nutty right-wing mantra that government is bad. Then we let the nutty process run for a couple of decades and discover

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Chris Dunford
But here we are wiser. Taking cues from Microsoft, US businesses have learned the benefits of incompatibility. The best way to retain clients is to make them fearful of using any system but yours. Well played! Nice job of working a gratuitous potshot at MS into a conversation that has no

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Well played! Nice job of working a gratuitous potshot at MS into a conversation that has no relation whatsoever to anything that MS does. Not my fault if you are not paying attention. The strategy of incompatibility was not invented by the telcos.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
Given M$'s history they probably got the strategy from someone else as well. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well played! Nice job of working a gratuitous potshot at MS into a conversation that has no relation whatsoever to anything that MS does. Not my

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Who is attacking their system? It is not always a bad idea for a monopoly. I am not a right wing nut either. Ever hear of socialized medicine? Government monopolies also yield some pretty good airlines. Ever heard of Lufthansa. Stewart At 08:59 AM 7/1/2008, you wrote: They do not have

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Ever hear of socialized medicine? Most of my relatives live in Europe. Some are doctors. They are very, very happy with their socialized medicine. Health care is their #1 reason for not wanting to live in the US. They are amazed how easily Americans are brainwashed by greedy insurance

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread rlsimon
Interestingly, in Belgium if I use up the PayGo card to zero, people can still call me inasmuch as the caller pays and the recipient does not!! Here in the USA they sell AIR twice; they've got us commin'goin' !! If the caller is on the same company as I had (Proximus), then nobody pays on

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Janaki Kuruppu
Ever hear of socialized medicine? Most of my relatives live in Europe. Some are doctors. They are very, very happy with their socialized medicine. Health care is their #1 reason for not wanting to live in the US. They are amazed how easily Americans are brainwashed by greedy insurance

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Larry Sacks
] On Behalf Of Tom Piwowar Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:49 AM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser Ever hear of socialized medicine? Most of my relatives live in Europe. Some are doctors. They are very, very happy with their socialized medicine. Health care

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Not just Europe, but also Canada. My in-laws are retired and have free health care and prescription coverage. Could not understand why my daughter had a quite wedding to secure health care coverage and then plan a big wedding later. My first child was born in Canada and had sever congenital

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
WHOA Do you know anything about the Canadian health care system besides that??? The problem is that the hospitals are not funded enough. The problem is rationing which heaven forbid we do not want. If it is critical and an emergency they will treat. Otherwise you need to wait in line.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Chris Dunford
The super-duper efficient eh Canadian Health Care system saved themselves the cost of a MRI. He died 3 months later. Amazingly enough, from a heart attack. Yep...that's just what we need. Good ol' soh-she-ah-lized medicine. Yes, our system is way better.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Larry Sacks
. None of your conditions are important enough. -Original Message- From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rev. Stewart Marshall Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:20 AM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser WHOA Do you

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Oh yeah eh. The Canadian Health Care System is a model of efficiency too. A friend's doctor ordered a MRI for a concern about a possible Certainly tragic, but what is the screw-up rate at US hospitals? Would it have been better to not provide MRI in the region because it was too sparsely

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Larry Sacks
@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser The super-duper efficient eh Canadian Health Care system saved themselves the cost of a MRI. He died 3 months later. Amazingly enough, from a heart attack. Yep...that's just what we need. Good ol' soh-she-ah-lized medicine. Yes, our system

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Larry Sacks
blame MS for it. Obviously all the ills of the world are the fault of MS. -Original Message- From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Piwowar Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:50 AM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
I am a doctor, in the US, and I just spent more than an hour of my morning on the phone with three different insurance companies to get a required medication for one of my patients.. But we do not call it rationing. What is the job title for an MBA who makes life and death medical decisions

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Interestingly, in Belgium if I use up the PayGo card to zero, people can still call me inasmuch as the caller pays and the recipient does not!! Here in the USA they sell AIR twice; they've got us commin'goin' !! If the caller is on the same company as I had (Proximus), then nobody pays on

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Chris Dunford
Oh. Wow. I see your point. Our system just sucks so badly that we should abandon it. Not my point at all. My point was that neither healthcare system is without serious flaws. If I have the money, then the US system can't be beat (let's admit it, if this woman had had enough money, she'd

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Chris Dunford
You know, if you watch the ER video you will see someone walk by and ignore the woman lying on the floor. It's a little fuzzy, but I'm pretty sure it was Gates. I think I'll take the high road here and just blame MS for it. Obviously all the ills of the world are the fault of MS.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread mike
Until very recently the Feds counted everyone in a zip code as having broadband if ONE had broadband. I believe they also don't count anything 1.5 and lower as broadband now. This reason below is probably partly why I sit at 1.3mbit and will according to a Qwest rep, sit there forever. There is

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread chad evans wyatt
a Maserati everywhere over there. Our buy, then dump economic mentality gives me great concern. Chad --- On Tue, 7/1/08, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Date: Tuesday

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
OK here is how it works very often. I live in LA (Lower Alabama) on the east side. Last year they came through and repaved the main north south artery. One intersection was supposed to be fixed. It did not get done in conjunction with the paving job. Now this is a multi million dollar fix

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
It is a highly dangerous intersection. The fix had been approved and funded and at the last minute they pulled the funding, why? So they could give it to another part of the state to lure a business into the area! Yeah this stuff happens all the time and the criteria stinks You mean

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Larry Sacks
it... -Original Message- From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Piwowar Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:13 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser Thanks, Tom. I wander away for half a day, suddenly we're onto

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Have and have nots? When did broadband become a fundamental right? You are coming from a strange place. Broadband is not a fundamental right, but it is fundamental to the operation of a modern technological society. With crappy broadband the US falls further and further behind. If we want to

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
No what it did was let us subsidize a project in Mobile while we got nothing. Mobile is a fast growing area and has way more industry than we do. Our tax base is very low. (Low industry) We constantly try and lure industry here, but because the politicians have not put the roads here we

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread mike
Interchangable parts doesn't mean interoperability. The guns you refer to were interchangeable only as far as the same model/manufacturer. When I ran mac os pre X, after a clean install I ususally made copies of my finder and system suitcase, I could then given strange problems later on, replace

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread rlsimon
I agree, but the studies were for adults. I don't believe the safety of rf exposure to young children over time is settled science. Wouldn't you be loath to accept such exposure as a PZB member only to find out 20 years down the road those kids are sick from it ??

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Jeff Wright
I agree, but the studies were for adults. I don't believe the safety of rf exposure to young children over time is settled science. Wouldn't you be loath to accept such exposure as a PZB member only to find out 20 years down the road those kids are sick from it ?? No, I would loathe to

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread mike
Don't you JOKE about odd socks! It's a serious matter. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Jeff Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the road those kids are sick from it ?? No, I would loathe to tremble in the corner in fear every time some crackpot gets a soapbox and announces that they

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Ah yes... Tom is the overseer of all that is good or bad... Ah yes, when you can't prevail on the merits switch to personal attacks. I certainly would. * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Tom Piwowar
Interchangable parts doesn't mean interoperability. The guns you refer to were interchangeable only as far as the same model/manufacturer. It was the first step. Before then each individual rifle was a unique item. Then the benefits of uniformity within a plant were discovered. Then uniformity

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Chris Dunford
According to the physicists, they settled it without the need for any medical trials at all. The root cause of cancer is the disruption of molecular bonds, and radio waves aren't energetic enough to do that. I'm no physicist, but Bob Park (Voodoo Science) is, and that's what he says...

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-07-01 Thread Janaki Kuruppu
which costs money, and raises the total cost of healthcare in the U.S. On Jul 1, 2008, at 5:00 PM, rlsimon wrote: That's why most medical offices have an employee to do all that! -Original Message- From: Janaki Kuruppu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:04 PM

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread David K Watson
Don't give up hope yet. It hasn't been that long since the NJ legislature opened up the FIOS market by enabling statewide franchises so that the FIOS companies don't have negotiate with every little municipality. The FIOS companies (mostly Verizon) will pick the low-hanging fruit first, the

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Ralph
Florida is doing a lot of public private construction of roads and bridges and so that is now being explored. Except for opposition from land owners and NMBY folks and those small towns who say we will loose all our traffic it looks like it might get started and done in 5 years. Much faster than

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Jeff Wright
A private venture already investing in rural broadband, no guvmint handout necessary, competing with cellular business models no less. Demand, meet supply. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/29/AR2008062901 697.html

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Matthew Taylor
And I look forward to the nether regions freezing over before I see a Verizon FIOS truck in my area of central MD of 1 - 5 acre lots mixed in with 100+ acre family farms. I still don't have reliable cell coverage (which is not a bad thing when the boss wants to reach me ...), and

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Matthew Taylor
Rural and small town America has outsourced the fire departments for years - it is called the local volunteer fire department. We also outsource part of the police force - the local volunteer auxiliary police who do crowd control and general event security. It seems to work just fine,

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread rlsimon
Problem with wireless is the rollout is not complete so there is little room for the ultimate solution to reliability; redundancy. -Original Message- From: Eric S. Sande [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 7:21 PM To: rlsimon Cc: 'Computer Guys Discussion List' Subject:

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
It is my understanding that at present most wireless companies lease space on towers and do not own the towers. Plus you need to have a tower about every 20 miles. Stewart At 12:23 PM 6/30/2008, you wrote: Problem with wireless is the rollout is not complete so there is little room for the

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Larry Sacks
AM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser It is my understanding that at present most wireless companies lease space on towers and do not own the towers. Plus you need to have a tower about every 20 miles. Stewart At 12:23 PM 6/30/2008, you wrote: Problem

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Jeff Wright
-Original Message- Correct, to an extent. My town (Middleburg) leases to most of the carriers on our two water towers. We prohibit private towers inside town limits. No one wants the eye sore of private towers here. It was a unanimous vote? *No one* wants rental income from the

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Snyder, Mark (IT CIV)
: [CGUYS] US is access loser -Original Message- Correct, to an extent. My town (Middleburg) leases to most of the carriers on our two water towers. We prohibit private towers inside town limits. No one wants the eye sore of private towers here. It was a unanimous vote? *No one

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Tom Piwowar
I find it strange how many of us will tolerate all sorts of technological eyesores on our streets: power lines, telephone poles, traffic lights, mailboxes, street lights, lines for phones and cable, satellite dishes, cars, trucks, roads, etc, but lose all rationality when it comes to cell towers.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Jeff Wright
Yes but mailboxes, street lights, lines for phones and cable, satellite dishes, etc don't emit harmful waves that will let you cook an egg. :- ) I heard it was the mailboxes that beam messages into your head. I'm starting a petition to have these dangerous boxes removed.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Eric S. Sande
I heard it was the mailboxes that beam messages into your head. Hey, beaming messages into your head is my department. I'm the guy who is part of the vast right wing conspiracy. Not only do I work for the phone company but I also belong to the NRA and possibly the Republican Party, although

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread rlsimon
I'm on the Planning/Zoning Board of our town. Recently we reviewed an app to put up a tower along the main road on a piece of land behing fire company #2 with good rental $$ for the town. I objected given it is kiddycorner across the street from the new school. They brought in a big gun (prof

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Eric S. Sande
I wonder if it is a settled issue or if there is still any doubt?? There's doubt about the amount of RF radiation you get from a handset transmitting next to your brain. I doubt that the transmissions from a tower would be an issue unless you were right next to the antenna. Like within a few

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
I know a church that has gotten a nice monthly income from leasing space inside their bell tower for Antenna space. Stewart I have seen some well camouflaged cell towers made to look like pine trees. Not bad at all. I would expect being in a dead zone would be depressing on property values

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Larry Sacks
radiation during mass. :-) -Original Message- From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rev. Stewart Marshall Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:55 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser I know a church that has gotten

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Larry Sacks
Message- From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric S. Sande Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:57 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser I wonder if it is a settled issue or if there is still any doubt?? There's doubt about

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Well it is a Lutheran Mass so we wear our aluminum hats. :-) Stewart At 05:09 PM 6/30/2008, you wrote: Hmm... on top of a church bell tower, eh? What better way for all that radiation to be spread out from the sheer height alone and who ever said radiation only goes outwards and not

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
I am not sure what it is with many of you and cell phones but my signal and reception and clarity are pretty darn good. I live in just this side of the hinterland and we have a very hilly area (Antennas are placed on the high points) Even in many supposedly rural areas I have good coverage

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Larry Sacks
: Monday, June 30, 2008 3:17 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser I am not sure what it is with many of you and cell phones but my signal and reception and clarity are pretty darn good. I live in just this side of the hinterland and we have a very hilly

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Eric S. Sande
I am not sure what it is with many of you and cell phones but my signal and reception and clarity are pretty darn good. A few factors play into this. Inside steel framed office buildings (well actually reinforced concrete, mostly, where I am) you are in a Faraday cage. If you aren't near a

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread rlsimon
I live in the official hinterland ...pop 1100. And I tried fones from the big4 ...no dice for tmo or next/spr (even with an antenna on a tower right behind our town hall 1mi away) ...verizon had some signal, but ATT gives me 5 bars at my desk (so I can ramble on all day) and at my kitchen table

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Tom Piwowar
I just read that iPhone service plans with unlimited data start at $24 USD in Hong Kong. That is about 1/4 of the lowest US price. That's what we mean by being losers. * ** List info, subscription management, list rules,

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Jeff Wright
Yeah, but they have to stand in long iPhone data plan lines to get it. Then they have to go stand in the voice plan line. I don't even want to think about the accessories line. -Original Message- I just read that iPhone service plans with unlimited data start at $24 USD in Hong Kong.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
They do not have a multitude of carriers, and usually have a government monopoly, or one that is heavily subsidized by the government. I am not sure if many knew this but recently Bell Canada (The Canadian offshoot of the Bell Companies) Was recently cleared to allow the Ontario Teachers

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread chad evans wyatt
Thanks to Gerald for pointing once more to the archaic wireless system we enjoy, seemingly without protest. In 1886, captains of industry here decided that, yes, it was a good idea to establish standard gauge railroads. Before that, cargo had to be transferred upon arriving at a different

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-30 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
GSM is not a world standard. It is used in a good portion of the world but CDMA is also recognized as a standard. The reason for lack of signal is not CDMA vs. GSM it is lack of antennas!! As I stated earlier you must have antennas about every 20 miles to get good coverage. ( I think it

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Tom Piwowar
Precisely. The Internet was created using public tax dollars and then given away by corrupt politicians to greedy corporations. The public has been on the short end of battle after battle. What you are seeing in the US is the result of media consolidation and the giving away and selling of our

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Steve Rigby
On Jun 29, 2008, at 10:51 AM, rlsimon wrote: On NPR there was a story claiming the US was a winner initially in the lineup of those nations affording access to broadband internet being amongst the top 4 while now we are 15th behing Luxembourg ...I know this for sure having recently visited

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Chris Dunford
On NPR there was a story claiming the US was a winner initially in the lineup of those nations affording access to broadband internet being amongst the top 4 while now we are 15th behing Luxembourg ...I know this for sure having recently visited Belgium where ... While it is certainly true

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
There is another stark difference in that we are much farther apart than any of those European countries. Put in population density and see this difference. Luxembourg 481/sq.mi. Belgium 892/sq.mi. USA 80/sq.mi. Years ago the rural phone customers used to

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Tom Piwowar
Put another way, the US has to wire up 3,798 Luxembourgs. :) This is such silly logic that it is hard to respond. Compare the difficulty of burying fiber in an urban area to doing the same in a rural area. In the city they are lucky to bury a couple hundred feet in a day. In rural areas the

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Stephen Brownfield
It may be true that most Americans are happy with what they have, because they don't know of anything better (ignorance is bliss). People were relatively happy with dial-up until they experienced broadband. But most of us have limited options as far as broadband goes. I have a

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
1.) If you are trying too bury it you are stupid. Of course you cant bury it in urban areas that does not make sense. Pole to pole is much faster and easier. (In some urban areas they set up underground conduits where it is much easier and much better to do underground.) 2.) Broadband

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
I have FIOS at home and a shared T1 at work. Talk about a let down. On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Stephen Brownfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It may be true that most Americans are happy with what they have, because they don't know of anything better (ignorance is bliss). People

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Eric S. Sande
I have FIOS at home and a shared T1 at work. Talk about a let down. Which one aren't you happy with? * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
My FIOS speed is around that of a T3 no problems there. The office T! gets bogged down pretty easily being shared by around 20 people.. On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Eric S. Sande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have FIOS at home and a shared T1 at work. Talk about a let down. Which one aren't

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread maruca
On Jun 29, 2008, at 3:22 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote: I have FIOS at home and a shared T1 at work. Talk about a let down. which? * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy,

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Eric S. Sande
1.) If you are trying too bury it you are stupid. Of course you cant bury it in urban areas that does not make sense. Pole to pole is much faster and easier. (In some urban areas they set up underground conduits where it is much easier and much better to do underground.) We can do it

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Jeff Wright
Europeans aren't dealing with the same scale issues I am. You must not be using a Piwowar projection map. The US is about the size of Rhode Island on a Mercator map and Luxemburg looks to be the size of China. * ** List

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread rlsimon
OK ...here goes!! I just got back from Belgium visiting the family for the first time since 2001. Already in 2001 when we were going along the highway from Brussels to the eastern city of Liege with the car radio turned off, the radio suddenly turned itself on and gave us a traffic accident

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread rlsimon
Take a look at this!! Doel, Belgium. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d0/DoelMolen.jpg/451px -DoelMolen.jpg * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy,

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Lest I remind you that most of these enterprises are government controlled and government funded enterprises. Yes there is a density of Antennas but that is the only way to get coverage. Most places here do not have service because no one will allow them to place an antenna for service.

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Eric S. Sande
Am I correct in assuming that many of these other countries have some kind of government support in developing a broadband system? Yeah, that's a point. I don't believe we ever got a dime out of the government outside of the Federal Cost Recovery Surcharge, which was actually pretty big money,

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread rlsimon
I am loath to expect the optical solution will stand the traffic demands over the short term. I can't understand why more has not gone into wireless as a longer term solution with less disruptive infrastructure demands albeit the view of a tower herethere which pales in comparison to the

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Eric S. Sande
I am loath to expect the optical solution will stand the traffic demands over the short term. I can't understand why more has not gone into wireless as a longer term solution with less disruptive infrastructure demands albeit the view of a tower herethere which pales in comparison to the

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Tom Piwowar
Lest I remind you that most of these enterprises are government controlled and government funded enterprises. Do you refuse to drive on any roadway that was not privately built? * ** List info, subscription management,

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Tom Piwowar
Wireless is fine but so far it is a sub-optimal technology in terms of speed and reliability. Do you really want a system that drops out whenever it rains? * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Tom Piwowar
I have FIOS at home and a shared T1 at work. Talk about a let down. Why would anyone use T1 today? T1 is 1.5 Mbps. That was considered fast 10 years ago, but is crappy even by US standards. * ** List info, subscription

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Been there done that not interested. Stewart At 07:40 PM 6/29/2008, you wrote: Wireless is fine but so far it is a sub-optimal technology in terms of speed and reliability. Do you really want a system that drops out whenever it rains? Rev. Stewart A. Marshall mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
You might be better off driving on private roads in some parts. To get from Panama City, FL. north you have to take an old 4 lane public access road that goes through every town with appropriately slow speeds. There has been talk of a publicly constructed 4 lane or more interstate

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread Eric S. Sande
Do you really want a system that drops out whenever it rains? I'm not sure I know what you mean by that. If you are saying that a copper network is subject to weather I'll agree. That's why we are replacing it. Its physics. If you are talking about wireless, well your call will eventually

Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser

2008-06-29 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
I reverse commute. T1 is the best they can get out in the sticks without paying through the nose. We get spoiled in the close in DC suburbs. On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have FIOS at home and a shared T1 at work. Talk about a let down. Why would