http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-10 14:33 ---
You may have to rerun harddrake or similar (however on my 600X running cooker
there seems to be no configuration - ie no modules listed in /etc/modules.conf).
Could you
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-10 18:46 ---
Gimp is still GTK-1.x, so has no XFT support.
Have you tried with gimp1.3 ? For me, Gimp-1.3 shows all the fonts I have
(AFAICS), at least > 100.
So, for Gimp-1.2.x, i
[ I hoped to avoid this thread ... ]
> I don't know if the font problem when exporting to PDF is in the Linux
> version as well.
OK, so we'll ship a 500MB update (SRPM=300MB, RPMS=200MB) for a bug which
may not even affect us?
This just isn't going to happen unless there is a really important b
> With previous releases of Mandrake, I've always deselected the
> bootsplash package during install.
>
> With 9.2 RC2, that's impossible, as bootsplash is required by a long
> list of packages, including icewm, galeon, gedit and evolution.
Actually, bootsplash is only required by mandrake_theme,
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 00:57, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 19:09, Austin wrote:
>> > On 10/04/2003 05:23:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > > 9.2 is finalised and gone to duplication. It's way too late. You
>> have to learn to let go, man. :D
>> >
>> > True, but I think the ques
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 14:55, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>> Jos Hulzink kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 05 Lokakuu
>> 2003
>>
>> 15:30):
>> > This is not a matter of depending on gaim, this is a matter of
>> willing to prevent reviews from writing "Mandrake 9.2 is no good, it
>> comes wit
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5859
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-10 12:39
> --- For me network start takes REALY long when not connected to then
> net: eth0 1 minute 20 seconds (8139too)
Have you tried enabling network hotplugging for th
> Kirjoitit viestissäsi (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 05 Lokakuu 2003 17:28):
>> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 14:55, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>> > Jos Hulzink kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 05 Lokakuu
>> 2003
>> > today gaim, tomorrow OpenOffice.org final..., and then ...
>> >
>> > and suddenly the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6075
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5889
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5889
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6071
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5889
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
>> Making your way trough
>> sourceforge to find the correct update is not done for newbies that
>> try Mandrake as Redmond OS replacement, and Mandrake attracts a lot
>> of those.
>
>
> Just for this reason alone I think there should be a Mandrakeupdate.com
> that a newbie could go to and get the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6068
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-10 14:40 ---
This is not a bug, but a bad design decision. The network wizard's most
prominent name setting is for the zeroconf name, not the hostname.
This issue has been discussed
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 17:05, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>> > > People will start saying: "... but you updated that package ...",
>> and "this package adds or modifies this or that feature that is
>> needed... if we don't have it I consider it's broken... and we
>> can't have a "broken" distrib..."
>>
> On Sunday 05 October 2003 15:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > If software is buggy, you can do three things IMHO:
>> Sorry, but where is the bug report for this buggy software?
>> This is not a bug (to my understanding), but a feature
>> enhancement (if we're talking about gaim).
>
> If by "feat
> Hi
>
> I have a problem with the integrated RTL 8139 ethernet chip in my new
> Acer TravelMate 233. The 8139too 0.9.26 driver dies with a Oops: 0002
> message it says in another place:
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 0008
> printing eip:
> d06261c0
>
>
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6085
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|error running make xconfig |error running make xconfig
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5889
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-10 13:20 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[simon] wrote:
You mean by the installation program? Yes, it might be an idea to run
something like:
# pushd /etc/alter
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6087
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-10 13:59 ---
$ rpm -qR gnome-terminal|grep vte
libvte.so.4
$ urpmq -p libvte.so.4
libvte4
You should run 'urpmi --auto-select', and not just install individual packages
from cooker
> Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Error scenario: when doing a network install, on recent
>> > machines, the network card seems to not respond (no DHCP answer
>> received for > example)
>> > Why: problem with APIC
>> > Solution: type F1 then "linux noapic" when booti
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5991
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-10 01:28 ---
But, the question here is what the desired behaviour is.
-Does the user want the hostname provided by the DHCP server? If so, then tmdns
can solve this problem (well, I
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5945
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-10 14:09 ---
Well, cooker is always newer ...
But, I haven't noticed this (console logins as root work fine) on my clean
install of 9.2rc2, and this hasn't been reported by anyone e
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3629
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-04 19:30 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
iuri.f wrote:
crashes kde printing system -
kcontrol.
Does it work with other printers? Do you by any chance use somethi
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3331
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm trying to compile lirc 0.7pre1 to support my PVR-250 and its new
> remote. However, when running the lirc autogen.sh script it
> complains that automake v1.5 is required. So:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]$ rpm -qa|grep automake
> automake-1.
> En/na Buchan Milne ha escrit:
>
>> I agree. At present, uw-imap and (IIRC this was done for 9.1)
>> courier-imap, if you add a user to the system, their mail works (with
>> no further mess).
>
> that's because uw-imap user database *is* the system database, there's
> no way out. cyrus-imapd otoh
> Well, SPARC's (and at some point Alpha and Opteron 240 SMP) at CSC are
> on private network behind 9.1 i586 box. I can't see anything that
> should stop us from creating the extranet and have the builds automated
> and
> coordinated. Some centralised user authentication might be a good idea
>
> fredagen den 6 juni 2003 21.27 skrev Vincent Danen:
>> > I'm thinking more like the next release, possible ways to claim a
>> more "secure" os. It's just a way of thinking..., maybe we could do
>> this and get away with it, or maybe not. The usability will have to
>> remain, but certain things w
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> yes and you get mail for mister rpcuser actually delivered :(
Which can easily be prevented, especially when using courier+ldap.
>
>>> By taking advantage of an LDAP environment, and using PAM, if I
>>> create an LDAP account, v
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:20:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> only because noone has already scripted for him something that is
> functional?, I am positive m$ exchange does not auto create a mailbox
> for every user on w
Luca Berra wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:12:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I DO agree with you in that the user should be able to check the
> checkbox, if you leave me the possibility of modifying what the checkbox
> does, that is.
Well, you would then probably want to be able to m
> :-)
>
>> OK, then I will stop working on a libconf
>>
> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/LibconfProject)
>> backend for OpenLDAP
>
>
> What you are working on, is it a way of storing the
> configuration in LDAP instead of PERL? If that is the
> case it is a very cool concept.
>
No
> fredagen den 30 maj 2003 19.13 skrev magic:
>> I was going to reply to the last openldap message, but decided to
>> start a new thread.
>>
>>I am presently building a mail server based on MDK 9.1 with updates
>> (not cooker environment).
>>
>>I rebuilt Buchan's openldap 2.1.19 (against th
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:53:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm not totally convinced every sysadmin needs something like this, in
>> our network we have an internal ftp mirror of main+contrib+updates for
>> any realease we have on any machines (well, we had to write 8.2 to DVD
>> sin
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:13:09PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
>> First stab:
>> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RequestedFeatures
>>
>> Those with edit access on the Wiki, feel free to expand ...
>
> Here's a few other ones (I don't have write access).
>
> How about more support f
> Ran across this one today... I'm in the process of testing it and so far
> so good. (Only one box at the moment.) This program is originally
> written for the 2.5 kernel but has been back ported to 2.4. Given the
> difficulties supermount has had I was wondering if this might make it
> easier f
> On Fri, 30 May 2003 20:24:12 +0200, bgmiln wrote:
>>
>>
>> BTW, I will investigate the auxiliary objectclass account
>
> Are you referring to the message Luke Howard sent to OpenIT's Core-Dev
> list that I referred to in the other openldap 2.1 thread?
>
Yes.
>> which is in
>> pam_ldap, and see
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>>On Fri, 30 May 2003 20:24:12 +0200, bgmiln wrote:
>>>
>>>
BTW, I will investigate the auxiliary objectclass account
>>>Are you referring to the message Luke Howard sent to OpenIT's Core-Dev
>>> list that I referred to in the other openldap 2.1 thread?
>
> Es Diumenge 01 Juny 2003 13:58, en [EMAIL PROTECTED] va escriure:
>> >> i tried with "noapic and acpi=off" but it failed too.
>> >
>> >What about removing any acpi reference and adding "noapic" ?
>>
>> i tried without any acpi reference and it doesn't work too.Whatever i
>> do when acpi is diffe
> the subject says it all
>
> v.
Vincent, I think in future could we avoid announcements like this on
cooker? If we were to have an announcement for every new release on this
list, it could get quite crowded.
Note that many maintainers either
-subscribe to the announce mailing lists for the softw
>
> I got a good deal on a toshiba 2435 so I didn't get too picky.
>
> Boy, what an experience getting it installed.
>
> This may already be a well known issue, and then maybe not
> so I figured better safe to say something.
>
> The install kernel "alt1" was able to complete an install
> and zap th
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> you can configure samba/ apache/ , manage packages, .
> with ncursses DrakConf ?
Find out for yourself:
# unset DISPLAY
# drakxconf
# drakwizard
Hmm, drakwizard seems to miss a cancel button in ncurses, so you may need
to background it to kill it ... but it w
> On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 17:38, Buchan Milne wrote:
> on this? I coincidentally had a problem with ifplugd too, today. After
> restarting my firewall machine, the eth0 interface (which is connected
> to the ADSL modem) came up without problems, but the eth1 (connected to
> the internal network) c
J. A Magallon wrote:
>
> That is one of the things I don't like of ifplugd. I want my private
> interface up even with no cable plugged. I want to have the if up, and a
> dhcpd running on it for the moment I plug in anything. And also
> netatalk, smb, and ipforwarding.
>
> I configured eth1 with st
> On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 04:10, Luis Ortega wrote:
>> I would if I knew what bothered you. I am very much
>> interested in this package being promptly packaged as
>> I am testing it.
>
> For this kind of central package you can take it as read that the
> packager will be aware of releases as soon as
> It's the glob. For better packaging, you would at least use something
> like
>
> %{_libdir}/%{name}
> %{_libdir}/whatever
Why??? Until now, we knew that there would only ever be files that needed
to be in the package there. What happens when rpm decides they now want
unstripped copies of binarie
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 12:27:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Anyway, for some reason samba3beta1 builds fine on my cooker box (well,
>> my cvs snapshot from Thursday did), but fails on the build cluster,
>> with:
>>
>>In file included from smbd/quotas.c:65:
>>/usr/include/linux/quota.h:48
>
> Hey Buchan, thanks for this information. And with
> appologies to the list this was the purpose of my
> short message announcing the beta release. I know that
> you are working on it and was hoping that you would be
> awake and would answer.
>
Ahh, but there are better ways of achieving this,
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 03:37:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>with 2.3.2-4mdk also. So it must be something else, possibly the fact
>> that klama is running kernel-2.4.19-16mdkenterprise (my cooker box is
>> running
> it could be, but samba should not include kernel headers
Well, since k
>> BTW, is there actually any real use for these debug packages. I had a
>> samba3-debug package (containing benchmark/validation tools), which I
>> now had to rename, and add provides/obsoletes for also.
>>
>> They could at least have chosen a better name (-rpm_debug or
>> something) which is gua
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
>>/me admits his ignorance of the existance of mandrake cvs, i will
>> search for it and see if i have anything else to patch.
>>
> got a spec from samba cvs and would like some comments:
>
BTW, note the way things work, the samba relea
> Neither do I. Probably because I don't know the intention of creating
> those debug info yet. Is this something new from stock rpm 4.2?
Apparently, but I am not sure ... I will ask on the maintainers list ...
> If so,
> I'd guess the name "debug" is chosen because Red Hat don't use this as
> p
dams wrote:
> Luis Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> Originally, when I checked the wiki page on libconf I
>> felt that it would be more interesting if the config
>> information was stored in XML. That way, with some
>> API, the configuration modules could be written in any
>> language, not ne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
> [...]
>
>> > libconf doesn't store the config information elsewhere than where
>> they are - in the config files. Libconf
>>
>> In the end, there must only be one copy of the configuration
>> information (any other system with meta-configuration eventually has
>> p
> Hi.
>
> I have just tried "comanche3-0b4" the apache config gui and it sucks...,
> just wanted you all to know this.
I haven't tried comanche since I setup my first apache server, which was a
long time ago (in the days of Netscape 3 and IE 2!). I thought it
might be worth something in a few
>> I would like to hear what you think about ksambaplugin ... I think
>> it's good enough to be used by newbie samba admin's, without needing
>> SWAT or webmin for anything.
>
> I have not used it yet but if you would like to point me to were I can
> get it I'll install and see what can be done.
> Hi all,
>
> We have full Vietnamese support in 9.1 and I would like to build a
> Knoppix-like CD using Mandrake. There is virtual-linux.org but the site
> is down last couple days. Anyone knows what happen to it?
>
> I googled a bit and found a few but they are all for different
> distributions (
> Martin Fahrendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > do you know why postfix in cooker still uses sasl v1?
>> >
>> > anyway i just took the sources for sasl v1 and rebuild saslauthd for
>> sasl1 (changing the socket path) and it works like charm with
>> postfix.
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > L.
>>
>> b
>>You suggesting to calculate it. These calculations can become very
>> complex. I would suggest to make a log. So if you urpmi foo, you also
>> have to install bar and blah. This results in a line in
>>/var/cache/urpmi/installlog: foo bar blah
>>
> Q: What would the impact be if you install multi
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4052
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-06 19:18 ---
Stefan, we just started using autofs (after installing our 2nd NFS server) with
automount maps in LDAP. I haven't rebooted my machine (ldap slave, all ldap
traffic is loc
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4095
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-06 20:20 ---
You (bug poster) didn't provide a link to the patch, but gcc-3.3-2mdk changelog
shows:
* Tue Jun 17 2003 Juan Quintela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3.3-2mdk
- Add reload1 patch
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3843
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-06 20:23 ---
IIRC, this perl module depends on the Netscape LDAP SDK, which is non-free. All
apps that use it should be fixed to use Net::LDAP instead, which is based on
libldap and
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3452
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-06 14:52 ---
> 1. Improve the documentation. The documentation for ifcfg does not mention
> MII_NOT_SUPPORTED. This should change.
See /usr/share/doc/initscripts-7.06/sysconfig.t
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4082
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Component|Installat
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4082
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4165
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-07 21:48 ---
It's very weird that 4000 other packages work fine with glibc in Mandrake 9.0
and 9.1, and one package that breaks blames it on glibc.
If the author can't provide facts
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4169
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-07 13:23 ---
Have you tried these packages:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/glibc/
If they make your application work, it means the bug is in your application,
triggere
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3615
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-07 16:45 ---
There is an unofficial kernel update available that provides ACLs on XFS. It is
available in the unsupported/MandrakeClub directory of the Mandrake-devel
mirrors. I have
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4227
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-07 19:54 ---
Please provide the contents of /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient-eth?.leases
It seems your provider's DHCP server is not in sync with the PTR records on
their DNS server, since it
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4218
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4159
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 16:08 ---
Please post the output of:
$ /sbin/lsmod
both before and after you configure the card.
Also, the output of:
cat /proc/cmdline
may be useful, as well as the contents o
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4256
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 23:03 ---
> Should rpm-build require autoconf-1.4 or should each package that requires
> autoconf-1.4 require it explicitly ?
I assume you meant automake.
There is no easy solut
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3543
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3312
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4275
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4313
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4307
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 20:30 ---
You don't, there is no package you can install to satisfy libcom_err.so.3
without problems. Wait for your mirror to catch up to latest evolution package.
More contrib pa
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 20:25 ---
Hmmm, I am not sure if this is one or two bugs. But the path provided by
/usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc is incorrect:
$ grep -i path /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc.rpmnew
Sys
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=375
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4287
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4414
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=71
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From [
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4443
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4456
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Component|isolinux
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4449
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4488
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-08 21:25 ---
According to the comments in #2741, this is fixed by the unofficial packages
that were provided (as opposed to your "but no one seems to care" statement).
Did you try t
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4462
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4488
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-08 15:10 ---
>> Most liekly you didn't read my post with the proper atention.
I did, most likely you didn't even bother to answer my questions.
>> Mandrake 9.1 has a bug that is st
301 - 400 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
