Marc Funaro wrote:
http://nyslittreedata.advantex.net/new/default/default.htm
I have renamed my div/ids and cleaned up a bunch of naming
conventions, and I'm using a little javascript called Nifty Corners
to round out the boxes where I wanted to. (yes, I cheated... So
punch me later ;)
On 5/19/06, Kenny Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if you gave the logo image:
#logo { margin:-10px; }
This would allow the H1 to collapse on it, right? As in the H1 would
only try to contain the height of the logo - 20, instead of the full
height? It usually seems to work this
Hi All.
I have troubles with floats in IE.
Here's the source
http://pastebin.com/724686
In IE container overflows contained items but there is no clearing...
How do i make it behave as say in Firefox...where items overlap container.
Thanks.
PS.the source is an excerpt so it may seem redundant.
Hi all
Currently renovating one our sites and moving to CSS basis.
Have also used Tedds code for boxes to good effect
It seems to render well in IE6, FF and Opera upto 1024 x 768. I noted last
evening that it broke at the higher res of a Dell laptop.
I think it may be due to position of
Lassi Heikkinen wrote:
I found a nice CSS thumbnail gallery which I have converted to
own styles: http://www.pulu.org/temp/cssgal/thumbgal.html
The rows are sorted according to window's size, so by resizing
the window the images are changing rows.
What I want is that each row should always
Christian Montoya wrote:
No. EMs provides the best scaling possible for a layout that is
intended to grow as the font grows. When the height and width of the
font characters is somewhat similar, doubly so.
Intending for layout's to scale based on font size isn't such a good
idea for
Hi all
Currently renovating one our sites and moving to CSS basis.
Have also used Tedds code for boxes to good effect
It seems to render well in IE6, FF and Opera upto 1024 x 768. I noted last
evening that it broke at the higher res of a Dell laptop.
I think it may be due to position of
On 5/19/06, Alastair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian Montoya wrote:
No. EMs provides the best scaling possible for a layout that is
intended to grow as the font grows. When the height and width of the
font characters is somewhat similar, doubly so.
Intending for layout's to
I think it may be due to position of background image for home
page and in
test-new.html the right hand cell moves out of alignment.
Any thoughts?
I have some pages parked at
http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk/templates/new-dol/
and
http://www.eystein.no/test/xrs/template_main.php
The li items in the navigation gets to much padding in IE6. I know this can
be avoided by setting a border to them, however, that messes up the
background images I'm using. Is there another solution to fix explorer?
I wrote:
Intending for layout's to scale based on font size isn't such a good
idea for accessibility
Christian Montoya wrote:
I never meant to imply that.
My apologies, I misunderstood.
Christian continued:
It's poor foresight on the part of the designer who forgets to
implement
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone can give me some reasons why doing a three
column layout with floats is 'better' than doing it with absolute
positioning. I have finally achieved the layout I was trying to get by using
a liquid center and two columns absolutely positioned, this was do-able with
Hi all,
I want to use a custom graphic as a bullet in a list. I can do this
(at least) two ways in CSS, by using list-style-image and by using
background-image. I wanted to know whether it is possible to
vertically position the bullet if I use list-style-image. I can't
find anything in
Eoin Maguire wrote:
[...]
I am not happy with using positioning instead of floats, but now that
I think about it I amn't sure *why* exactly I have a preference for
floating as a layout method.
Anyone got good reasons for using one over the other or have I just
picked up an irrational
What about using relative positioning? How does that fit in to this
argument?
Thanks,
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 11:59 AM
Eoin Maguire wrote:
[...]
I am not happy with using positioning instead of floats, but now
Any thoughts?
I have some pages parked at
http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk/templates/new-dol/
and
http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk/templates/new-dol/test-new.html
css at
http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk/templates/new-dol/includes/style-new.css
Cheers
Ian
This is quite bizarre. The home page
Stevio wrote:
What about using relative positioning? How does that fit in to this
argument?
It just complicates it ever so slightly, by altering the visual cues :-)
Relative positioning can be used to offset any element - including
'floats', but 'r.p.' leaves the element's original space
The floatclearing has returned to hunt me. How do I stop it from clearing
more then its parent div? Nor floating up next to the preseding div? I just
keep banking my head against the wall on this one.
http://www.eystein.no/test/xrs/template_main.php
Suggestions with this latest one are welcome -- am I closer to a good way
of doing it now than I was earlier? (I hope so!)
Hello Marc,
this is far better than your very first approach, I think you are on the
right track.
Further steps (after clearing the main layout probs):
Why not extend
Rehi Marc,
I think that the relative positioning of the Header and the TreeLogo
which Gunlaug's proposed would be a better an more unproblematic solution.
Niklas
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to use both a persistent and a preferred stylesheet, if I
specify both in my code?
Thanks,
Stephen
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub --
[2]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.xhtml
Having read this, I think it might be wise for me to declare my document as
simply HTML. I ignorantly used XHTML only because that's what was output
originally by Photoshop on my very first foray into an all-CSS layout.
HOWEVER, the
Sorry to sound grumpy... This CSS stuff has taken me back to beginner
level
and maybe I've chosen the wrong time to try this, as I really do want to
get
this done and the learning curve is steeper than is expressed in the
documents I've read online. Say what you want about tables, they
Marc Funaro wrote:
[2]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.xhtml
Having read this, I think it might be wise for me to declare my
document as simply HTML. I ignorantly used XHTML only because that's
what was output originally by Photoshop on my very first foray into
an all-CSS
If you can manage to get some kind of control over
those CMS users, then a complete 'HTML 4.01 Strict'
would be the right choice.
More info...
http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html
Eystein Alnaes wrote:
The floatclearing has returned to hunt me. How do I stop it from
clearing more then its parent div? Nor floating up next to the
preseding div?
http://www.eystein.no/test/xrs/template_main.php
You may start by deleting the class=clearfix on div#secondary_info.
Then,
Hello all,
I asked this question on a few boards but no one knew answer so i was hoping
for better luck here.
i am a bit stumped by the ALA article on custom borders:
http://alistapart.com/articles/customcorners
In 'Step 3', these gaps show up and i have no clue why.
In it they say The gaps are
Ian Young wrote:
It seems to render well in IE6, FF and Opera upto 1024 x 768. I noted last
evening that it broke at the higher res of a Dell laptop.
http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk/templates/new-dol/
and
http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk/templates/new-dol/test-new.html
css at
Marc Funaro wrote:
HTML 4.01 Strict is what I think I'll shoot for.
Good choice.
It seems the validator does not like the ULs nested inside, but
that's what I think I need to accomplish...?
Wrong nesting of lists.
Each subsequent ul should be wrapped in a li, like so...
ul
Thank you Georg, always the saviour!
Now, offcourse, IE is giving me a headache. It simply doesn't render some of
the styling, backgroundimages etc. Easy to spot - have a look:
http://www.eystein.no/test/xrs/template_main.php
http://www.eystein.no/test/xrs/template_om.php
Arian Hojat wrote:
Hello all,
I asked this question on a few boards but no one knew answer
so i was hoping for better luck here.
i am a bit stumped by the ALA article on custom borders:
http://alistapart.com/articles/customcorners
In 'Step 3', these gaps show up and i have no clue why.
Is there any known performance impact to possibly overly specific selectors?
ex:
#CategoryList li.Category ul li.product ul li.ciDsc a:hover {}
(vs.)
li.ciDsc a:hover {}
The first case is extremely specific and clues the reader to the structure of
the document
Does the second case incur less
On Friday 2006-05-19 12:42 -0400, Mike Dougherty wrote:
Is there any known performance impact to possibly overly specific selectors?
ex:
#CategoryList li.Category ul li.product ul li.ciDsc a:hover {}
(vs.)
li.ciDsc a:hover {}
The first case is extremely specific and clues the reader to
Mike Dougherty wrote:
Is there any known performance impact to possibly overly specific selectors?
snip
Does the second case incur less parse/render overhead?
I normally opt for readability, but I have recently executed a styled list of
links from what was
once a table-based layout.
On May 19, 2006, at 3:08 AM, Ian Piper wrote:
I am using the list-
style-image approach for the main content list. You can see that the
musical note image is slightly high wrt the text. I'd like to drop it
by 3 pixels or so.
Add 3 pixels of empty space to the top of the graphic. I prefer
I have a webpage, not of my own that I use for printing reports, and the font
is too small. I want to override the CSS that the company uses and replace it
with my own. Here is the HTML
TR valign=top
td nowrap class=smalltxtBandelnbsp;/td
td nowrap class=smalltxtGwennbsp;/td
td nowrap
If anyone could take a look at this page:
http://www.hospicevalley.org/
and see if you can figure out why IE on PCs push the top navigation way over
to the right, I would much appreciate it. It seems to work fine in Firefox
and Safari, but I'm not able to test on PCs right now.
Here is the CSS:
I was wondering...I've been Googling for the answer to this, and I can't
seem to find it. Basically, here's the problem:
I have a #wrapper container that's 700px wide and centered with margin:0
auto. I want a sidebar that is position:fixed and flush left and top
to the container - not the
Hi!
Niklas Kanthak wrote:
Don't use PNG for images, only GIFs or JPGs.
I'm just curious, why not to use PNG's. You mean PNG's in general, or
only transparent PNG's? Because I like this format much more than GIF's
or JPG's for it's better quality. I know that IE doesn't support
transparent
The selector is located in an external stylesheet, so I figured that what I
have set would override what they have. In their external sheet they have:
.smalltxt {
FONT-SIZE: 11px;
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;
}
How can I force it to override what they have? Is it
I'm just a rank beginner, but would a sliced header help? Could be
sliced near the left side image area, then the two pieces included as
backgrounds? The right side background could be a repeated gif to
expand as needed?
Dave
Eystein Alnaes wrote:
http://www.eystein.no/test/xrs/template_main.php
The li items in the navigation gets to much padding in IE6. I know this can
be avoided by setting a border to them, however, that messes up the
background images I'm using. Is there another solution to fix explorer?
Why not use a background image? Also, when you say you don't want it to work
in IE, just modern browsers, you have just lost most of your audience. IE6/7
is a modern browser, it's just problematic in its css support (proprietary
box model etc). So unless your site is going to be viewed only by
Stevio wrote:
What about using relative positioning? How does that fit in to this
argument?
Stephen,
Relative positioning is mainly used to cure IE bugs, occasionally to
shift elements from their normal position, but that's it. It's not used
for creating columnar layouts because the
Stevio wrote:
Is it possible to use both a persistent and a preferred stylesheet, if I
specify both in my code?
If you link to two style sheets, they will both be used on your page,
with cascade and specificity determining which rules take precedence in
case the rules in the two sheets
but now I see it's the same in Safari... can someone please help me
figure out why I don't have the 1px white space between the navbar
(#bar) and the branding area (#top) in IE and Safari that I see in Firefox?
http://www.skydogtech.com/pinck/html/
Thanks so much.
Hello All,
I apologize in advance for the length of this email but I'm just curious
about something and thought I'd send out a feeler. While recently revamping
my personal website, I had some specific requirements based on experiences
on other websites. My favorite example that I wanted to avoid
This does fix the positioning of the text, but the background image gets cut
off at the bottom after the text ends.
I had originally fixed that by giving #topnav a min-height, 25 px, the
height of the image. Now that is being ignored after the list ends. Any
suggestions?
On 5/19/06, Matt
On 5/19/06, Kenny Graham [EMAIL-REMOVED] wrote:
What if you gave the logo image:
#logo { margin:-10px; }
This would allow the H1 to collapse on it, right? As in the H1 would
only try to contain the height of the logo - 20, instead of the full
height? It usually seems to work
Suzanne Goodwin wrote:
but now I see it's the same in Safari... can someone please help me
figure out why I don't have the 1px white space between the navbar
(#bar) and the branding area (#top) in IE and Safari that I see in Firefox?
http://www.skydogtech.com/pinck/html/
See if adding
Erik Gyepes wrote:
Hi!
Niklas Kanthak wrote:
Don't use PNG for images, only GIFs or JPGs.
I'm just curious, why not to use PNG's. You mean PNG's in general, or
only transparent PNG's? Because I like this format much more than GIF's
or JPG's for it's better quality. I know
I recently overhauled my domain web-site and brought it up to date
with XHTML and CSS. I'm self-taught, but that hasn't stopped me from
trying to have a pretty good-looking (if quirky) site. But I'm
stumped and hope that my problem will be glaringly obvious to one of
you.
The URL:
One thing to be aware of is PNG color-shifting in IE. If you try to use
a non-transparent PNG with non-square edges and fill in the background
color, then place it inside a region with a CSS background-color, they
may not match up exactly, even with supposedly the same hex values. Even
when
There's javascript, sure. Couldn't we also try to advocate the introduction
of something like familied style sheets though? And then allow a browser to
specify an active stylesheet for each family, rather than just one active
stylesheet?
It's very early here in Oz, and I might have missed a
Hello,
I'm trying to retrofit a design I developed a couple of years ago (with
absolute positioning) to work with a CMS--specifically, I would like to
place a tools div at the top of the page.
I've been trying to revise the existing design/css so that all the
content will shift when the toolbar
Firefox issues:
The breadcrumbs were positioning themselves just fine until I moved the
logo for the page to the background, now they're offset from the top of
the viewframe. The main content container (.divBodyLow) has this odd
padding-issue going on, though I set no padding in the CSS. The
I wasn't raising a problem. I already have a javascript solution in place
for my website and you even included the part of my email where I mention
I'm already aware of javascript solutions, whether custom or plugin.
My email is raising a question about the way in which style sheets are used
and
Please read what Zoe Gillenwater wrote to the list a couple
of hours ago:
One other thing: please make sure to trim your posts. The
practice of including an entire quoted message below your
added comments is really increases the size of your messages,
making digests go out much more
Suzanne Goodwin wrote:
Hey, David: Thanks for your reply! I actually want the white
separation, but can't Safari or IE to behave. Adding negative padding
or margin to #bar has no effect.
David Laakso wrote:
Suzanne Goodwin wrote:
but now I see it's the same in Safari... can someone please
I'm trying to create two columns that have an equal length using a
background-image that gets repeated the length of the columns and using
two floats to position the text. The problem I've been trying to solve
is that the background-image does not appear behind the floats. It's all
part of a
Hi guys, i have an issue about anidated divs... look.
I don't know why when I put a div immediately inside of another div, the
first element in the anidated div, IE doesn't displays the correct format
defined in the CSS file (Firefox displays all fine). Yeah, I know, my
description it's a little
kuasar wrote:
I've found something in a page (
http://www.cristalab.com/tips/21618/png-con-transparencia-alpha-en-internet-explorer)
suposed to correct transparency problems, which I don't quite understand.
What do you think?:
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader»
Why not use a background image?
The logo is a transparent png, and it needs to be on top of a
background color that will expand/contract based on font size. I
suppose I might be able to get it to work as a background images if I
added a div in there, but I'd really prefer to have the logo still
Hi Folks,
I admit I'm no CSS wizard but I'm very perplexed why some very basic CSS to
style my links is not working:
http://www.douglasniven.com/books.php
I have the following embedded directly onto the page above:
style type=text/css!--
a:link {color: red} /* unvisited link */
a:visited
I have the following embedded directly onto the page above:
[snip]
Yet no colored links! Very confused. Any help would be much
appreciated!
You have font tags inside your links overriding the css.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
From: Doug Niven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I admit I'm no CSS wizard but I'm very perplexed why some very basic
CSS to
style my links is not working:
http://www.douglasniven.com/books.php
I have the following embedded directly onto the page above:
style type=text/css!--
a:link {color: red}
How about the fact that you're using font tags that are overriding the
CSS calls?
a title=Another Vietnam, from National Geographic Books
href=http://short Link target=_blank
font face=Arial color=#d8d8d8 size=2Another Vietnam/font/a
You need to get rid of those font tags.
~Shelly
Gavin Sharon wrote:
The problem I've been trying to solve is that the background-image
does not appear behind the floats.
http://www.gateway.org.nz/v2/example.php
The container doesn't expand to contain those floats, which is correct
according to CSS standards. The result is that the
Thanks so much Georg, it worked!
I'm still learning my way around CSS but enjoying it as I go.
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Gavin Sharon wrote:
The problem I've been trying to solve is that the background-image
does not appear behind the floats.
On Sat, 20 May 2006 02:26:28 +0800, Design Groups
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a #wrapper container that's 700px wide and centered with margin:0
auto. I want a sidebar that is position:fixed and flush left and top
to the container - not the browser window.
[snip]
in Opera , it
According to the spec[1], using position: fixed is *always* relative
to the viewport, unlike absolute positioning, which is relative to a
relatively or absolutely positioned containing block or, that
failing, the viewport.
Fixed positioning is like this because the element is positioned in
71 matches
Mail list logo