Actually your reply here made me re-think. We are using Percona 5.1, so
upgrading to 5.5 then 5.6 - so downtime of 5mins. Then using
pt-online-schema-change to perform the ALTER the structure without blocking
reads or writes.
Works a treat!
On 8 March 2016 at 10:21:45 PM, Andrea Brancatelli
Don’t forget this is mysql 5.1...
On 8 March 2016 at 10:21:45 PM, Andrea Brancatelli (abrancate...@schema31.it)
wrote:
As a side node that will require longer time and more space than the ALTER
TABLE Engine=InnoDB ROW_FORMAT_COMPRESSED, as you will have to read the table
to write the dump,
base sizes where no enough space is left
in other words: you should have upgraded years ago, can't remember when it was
here, in the meantime switched to mariadb 5.5 and last year upgraded to mariadb
10
Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----
Von: Simon Buchanan <grem...@gmail.com>
A - BO - FI - PA
ITALY
Tel: +39. 06.98.358.472
Cell: +39 331.2488468
Fax: +39. 055.71.880.466
Società del Gruppo SC31 ITALIA
Il 2016-03-03 22:08 Simon Buchanan ha scritto:
On 3 March 2016 at 11:36:59 PM, Andrea Brancatelli (abrancate...@schema31.it)
wrote:
Yes you can proceed easily with
of space to do the optimise, plus the
tables are write locked whist this happens (is this correct?). Thats going to
take a while on a 650GB table :) with live data on it.
Does Alter table write lock as well?
PS: also - what do i alter…
Simon
On 3 March 2016 at 9:42:03 AM, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 02.03.2016 um 21:30 schrieb Simon Buchanan:
> Is there any way to claw back this space?
first consider migartion to a more recent dbmail because
single-instance-storage will deduplicate mime-parts and so
arracuda and do an
ALTER TABLE Engine=InnoDB ROW_FORMAT=COMPRESSED?
Thanks
Simon
On 3 March 2016 at 9:30:50 AM, Simon Buchanan (grem...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi All,
We are running dbmail 2.2.18 for some legacy clients, the database is a debian
default 5.1.73. We have around 260 mailboxes on this se
the database size (even dump'ed) is 400GB. Surely dbmail does
not have that much overhead in its database?
Thanks!
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 19.03.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Simon:
What im trying to understand is why is the SUM of curmail_size is approx
110GB, yet the database size (even dump'ed) is 400GB. Surely dbmail does
not have that much overhead
500GB and the mysql data space is
just about full.
Is this something that dbmail is not reporting correctly curmail_size or
is this just innodb (e.g. does not reclaim the space).
If the later, I would really appreciate some pointers to deal with
reclaiming the space...?
Many thanks,
Simon
On 12/09/2012, at 7:26 PM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
On 09/12/2012 02:10 AM, Simon wrote:
Hi There,
We are using dbmail-2.2.18 on freshly minted debian squeeze for about 400+
mailboxes. The VM (esxi 5.0) it is running on has dual core Xeon E5645 @
2.4GHz with 1GB RAM.
I
MAXCHILDREN = 200
MINSPARECHILDREN = 10
MAXSPARECHILDREN = 100
The issue we have with this new install is that it runs into SWAP and just
(very) slowly fills the swap up.. its load average is 0.01-0.05.
Any ideas here, or are my settings above to much? need more RAM?
Simon
Hi There,
I might be asking the question in the wrong way.. but is there any way to force
pop users to delete messages from the server? e.g. no mater what they have as
keep a copy message on server dbmail still deletes it?
Thanks!
Simon
___
DBmail
On 25/08/2012, at 2:37 AM, Harald Leithner harald.leith...@itronic.at wrote:
Hi Simon,
I have similar problems in Mail.app 6.0 but I'm not sure if we have the
sample problems ;-)
I added my own account to mail.app (bad Idea adding a 5Gb mailbox) after
downloading my mails (I'm still
On 23/08/2012, at 2:55 AM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
On 08/22/2012 05:11 AM, Simon wrote:
Sorry to keep asking.. but i really want to keep using dbmail (!!!), but
cant with this client if there is not even an answer when it will be
compatible with apple mail?
I understand
On 22/08/2012, at 9:57 PM, Harald Leithner harald.leith...@itronic.at wrote:
Hi Simon,
I'm running dbmail 3 commit 22b964b, I tested it with one of our Imac using
Mail.app Version 5.2 (1278)
and have no problem... so could you give me a version number of Mail.app?
Version 6.0 (1485
to dbmail3 for our core mail server
platform.. many of our clients are mac users and use Mac Mail - asking them to
change their mail program is not viable... so therefore we have to change our
platform
Thanks!
Simon
On 17/08/2012, at 5:38 PM, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Paul,
Just
Hey Paul,
Just wondering if you got anywhere with this?
We are happy to assist where ever we can... its only dbmail 3.0, 2.2.x
is absolutely fine :)
Thanks!
Simon
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
On 07/05/2012 10:37 PM, Simon wrote:
Hi There,
We
On 6/07/2012, at 9:54 AM, Simon wrote:
On 6/07/2012, at 9:35 AM, Daniel Urstöger wrote:
Hi Simon,
I can feel your pain. One of my customers runs roughly 25-30 Apple clients
(Macs, iPhones, iPads, etc.) against dbmail 2.x and I havent seen any
problem like the two you described
On 6/07/2012, at 8:40 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.07.2012 22:37, schrieb Simon:
Hi There,
We are running dbmail 3.0.2 on debian squeeze for a client who all use Max
OSX and Apple Mail for their client... there is a weird issue(s):
1). When sending email, the email does not show up
On 6/07/2012, at 9:35 AM, Daniel Urstöger wrote:
Hi Simon,
I can feel your pain. One of my customers runs roughly 25-30 Apple clients
(Macs, iPhones, iPads, etc.) against dbmail 2.x and I havent seen any problem
like the two you described.
Yes - our main customer dbmail cluster (1500
On 22/06/2012, at 10:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.06.2012 07:47, schrieb Simon:
Hi There,
We have a CRM package that emails on behalf of our users, who are using
DBMail (3.x) and IMAP for their email.
I know its SQL so i know its techincally possible, but is there a correct
way
Hi There,
We have a CRM package that emails on behalf of our users, who are using DBMail
(3.x) and IMAP for their email.
I know its SQL so i know its techincally possible, but is there a correct way
todo this? if so, pointers would be really appreciated thanks!
Thanks!
Simon
Hi There,
I was testing the 2_2-3_0.mysql script on our dbmail-2.2.17 database (115GB -
running under a cloned VM of our live database), but the SSH connection died
before it completed... can i just simply run the script again or should i just
re-clone a new VM?
Thanks
Simon
in batches at times when fewer clients are
connected.
dbmail-util is used for that
-M::
migrate legacy 2.2.x messageblks to mimeparts table.
-m limit::
limit number of physmessages migrated. Default 1 per run.
Cool - so once all working, we can do things bit by bit. Nice.
Simon
On 26/01/2012, at 4:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
hi
i hope all is well with paul!
DBMail 3.0.0 final release candidate
2011-08-15
is there a plan for the final version?
Yes - i would like to know this as well :)
___
DBmail mailing list
Hi There,
Is there anyway to log the IP address of the pop and imap connections without
increasing TRACE_SYSLOG up to 4? DBmail 2.2.17 on debian squeeze BTW.
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin
Hi There,We are running dbmail 2.2.17 on a debian squeeze VM. It has two VCPUs and 1GB of RAM. Up until today it was connected to our old mailstore mysql VM (debian lenny, mysql 5.1, 2 GB RAM). Over the past couple of weeks we have been syncing mail (using imapsync - don't ask.) to our new
..
and it has settled down to normal now :)
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
to assist with mysql config to best utilise the
resources of the new VM?
Current my.conf is http://www.nzlocal.com/simon/dbmail_my_conf.txt
Many Thanks!!!
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman
platform for our clients.
Any feedback is very welcome!
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Hi There,
We need to migrate our 80+GB of mail over to a new mysql server (old
and new servers are 5.1 on 64bit debian squeeze). We are doing this
with imapsync.
Is it worth upgrading to dbmail 3 at the same time? Its still rc, but
that might change soon?
Simon
?
* stop live/vm server
* rsync of new mysql-datadir to the live-server
* start services/mysql on the liveserver
All good with the last 3...
BTW: Thank you for your replies.
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl
LOGIN --sep1 '/' \
--host2 HOST2 --user2 USER1 --authuser2 USER1 --password2 PASS1 --authmech2
LOGIN
This seems to work with a basic IMAP mailbox with a couple of messages in it
and some folders etc… but is there anything that might muck up with larger
mailboxes/messages?
Thanks
Simon
birds!).
Is this a normal process? Is there any changes or a different way of
doing this so that the mail will continue to flow thru?
Thanks
Simon
dbmail-util -ay output:
# cat dbmail-util.log
Repairing DBMAIL messageblocks integrity...
Ok. Found [0] unconnected messageblks.
Repairing DBMAIL
for the quick reply... i had thought it might be something like this.
2GB RAM on the MySQL box with the following:
http://www.nzlocal.com/simon/mysqlconf.txt
Simon___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Schattenfell p...@michael-neubert.de wrote:
Hello Simon,
I recommend you to use DBMail 2.2.17 or the new DBMail 3.0 RC2. I also
tested 2.2.11 with Debian but there were some really annoying bugs relating
IMAP daemon in this old release (IMAP daemons
dbmail-2.2.17.tar.gz?
Many thanks!
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
in a direction that works?
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
to server A works with no issues.
Any ideas on how to go about solving this one?
Many thanks,
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Solved! MAXCHILDREN was set to low (default setting)
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi There,
We added a new server (B below) to our mail config... So now we have:
A) DBMail 2.2.11 on debian etch (also running mysql 5.0.32)
B) DBMail 2.2.15 on debian lenny
see any issues here?
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
George Vieira wrote:
Hey Shane,
I'm looking for a way to rsync mail to a second server for mail migration..
I've worked out how to have multiple servers serving the same domain so you
could have users in different locations and either mail server acting as a MX
to the other for failover
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Note:
Everybody who care about their data, you should leave this setting on
it's default 1:
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1
Also, this will only affect writes - rather than reads.
S
___
DBmail mailing list
Jonathan Feally wrote:
Simon Gray wrote:
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Note:
Everybody who care about their data, you should leave this setting on
it's default 1:
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1
Also, this will only affect writes - rather than reads.
If you
Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Hey, all. I've got a bajillion e-mails in my e-mail. (I'm using dbmail
for archiving.) I don't care about disk space -- I've got it to throw
away. But searches take close to 5+ minutes. Any clues on indexing,
etc., that might be appropriate?
-Ken
How much
Hi There,
We have a external client management app that we would like to be able to
calculate the size of a dbmail mailbox with a SQL query. Can anyone give me
some pointers here to get this right please?
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
Simon wrote:
An assistance would be greatly apprectiated!
Show me the code.
Thanks Paul.. The code for /usr/local/autoresponder/autoresponder.php?
I have removed all the PHP that we currently have in the scipt to make
sure
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
Simon wrote:
Hi There,
After our forced upgrade of the os and dbmail from stage/dbmail_2.0
to etch/dbmail_2.2 we are seeing this sometimes in the mail filter
log:
Mar 11 17:32:21 mail-in1 postfix/qmgr[31948]: BAE4B482F9
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
Aleksander Kamenik wrote:
Simon wrote:
I have read various things, but it would be good to get the correct
thing todo here please?
First check your database settings. Default collation was latin/swedish
for mysql I think
cause the issue?
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
Looking at the logs I see:
Mar 12 08:11:40 mail-store1 dbmail/lmtpd[3544]: Info:[delivery]
pipe.c,send_mail(+144): opening pipe to
[/usr/local/autoresponder
thru.
Note that the /usr/local/autoresponder/autoresponder.php is owned by
the dbmail user and is executable.
An assistance would be greatly apprectiated!
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman
the migrate_from_2.0_to_2.2.mysql file, configuring dbmail for
our environment and starting it?
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi There,
Our dbmail 2.0 running on debian sarge was damaged last night.
We are currently building a new VM with debian etch and dbmail 2.2.
The innodb mysql database from the old server is just being recovered
onto the new
-by as well correct?
Correct.
Thanks Aaron, The VM has 2 x E5310 Xeon Cores @ 1.6GHz... and the
ibdata1 file is approx 40GB.. so that upgrade script might take a
while huh?
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman
) that
would be great to know.
Any ideas rough approx time? 30mins, 30hours, 30 days?
THanks
Simon
PS: WIll do on the reports.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
occured. Please check log.
I have read various things, but it would be good to get the correct
thing todo here please?
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
?
Any pointers?
Thanks,
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Cody Stewart wrote:
I am trying to add some rows to the database for additional
information to be stored and encrypting the body of the message. Can
someone point me to the file that has the actual mysql insert query's.
Why?
Is this for archiving purposes? or do you plan on just storing the
of ram handling 15-20gig dbmail db within
mysql - handling about 30 imap users just fine.
Yet, I have another box with 6gig of ram (raid 5 etc..) with 70gb dbmail
db for about 60 heavy imap users and its struggling.
Depends on the usage patterns of your users.
HTH
Simon
Ok, nothing to worry about. The \Recent flag on messages will be
incorrect, but no information is lost.
The culprit:
Nov 6 14:38:58 mail4-core-2 dbmail/imap4d[15280]: Debug:[sql]
dbmysql.c,db_query(+287): query [UPDATE dbmail_messages SET recent_flag
= 0 WHERE message_idnr IN
in the util? it is a problem in
pop3?! or maybe some co-problem between pop3 and imap daemon?!
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
they dont keep mails on the server at
all?!
Simon
PS: i will create a situation i can log. otherwise there is too much
garbage when lvl5 is running on a production server. ;)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet: Montag
=| /tmp/somefile
HTH
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Aleksander Kamenik schrieb:
Simon Lange wrote:
can anyone confirm this being a dbmail-issue?!
Did this occur with thunderbird 2.0.0.14? 2.0.0.16 was very recently
released.
And do attachments of any size cause the problem, would even a 1
kilobyte sized attachment be downloaded only partly
Will test it... will report here.
Jesse Norell schrieb:
Did this occur with thunderbird 2.0.0.14? 2.0.0.16 was very recently
released.
Have you read my initial post? I wrote Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (20080708) ;)
I'll interject and paraphrase the question, Thunderbird 2.0.0.16
or error-messages? if so, which one?
gosh, 7weeks and 5 years as linux administrator?! what have you done in
these 5 years?! ;) SCNR
Simon
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von David B.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Juli 2008 01:50
An: DBMail mailinglist
Betreff: RE: [Dbmail
Paul J Stevens wrote:
But there is another reason in the imap requirements: UID values must be
strictly ascending within a mailbox.
Rather than making the UID just an autoincrement, why not make it a
function with time? Therefore as long as the servers are time sync'd
(easy with ntp) you
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Simon Gray wrote:
Worth a thought or completely silly?
Worth a thought *and* not-quite-silly but it still wont do. In fact I did an
implementation of this once. There will still be ample opportunity for one
server to store a UID that is below the MAX(uid). *Any
Okay, but you may take a site which does not force registration. ;)
Otherwise you wont get a result which reflects the real usage.
Simon
__
UseTorrent - der sicherste, schnellste und umweltfreundlichste
BitTorrent
I'm not 100% sure, but I think these are MyISAM only. I think the
roughly equivalent InnoDB setting is:
innodb_buffer_pool = 1024M
It is myisam only, use buffer_pool instead.
Another thing that is worth doing is bypassing OS caching for table
access because MySQL does it's own caching, and
John Fawcett wrote:
Simon
I doubt that splitting the queries will change whether an index is used.
The potential index on mailbox_idnr is not a good one when there are
many rows corresponding to mailbox_idnr.
Did you try to explain the separated queries? The behaviour should be
the same
mailboxes - Its just that I can see this
becoming an issue in the future.
Simon
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
(2,1);
}
mb-exists = exists;
mb-unseen = exists - seen;
mb-recent = recent;
What do you think?
Simon
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Good Idea, but i would prefer perl. No need for installing another
interpreter if perl is already aboard.
You may have a perl version?
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Marc Dirix
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. April 2008 13:41
?
My dbmail_messageblks table is currently 9.8GB and is mysqldump'ed
each night, so i am going to use the nightly backup as a test for the
new server.
Thanks
Simon
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo
THUMB UP!!!
Would be great. Although you can doit with your mta (e.g. exim). But a
native dbmail implementation would be awesome!
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Michael Monnerie
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. März 2008 19:38
Okay, that wiped out any doubts. :) thanks. I just wanted to be sure about
this. ;)
Regards
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. März 2008 09:14
An: DBMail mailinglist
Betreff: Re: AW
of 2.2.10. is there a plan to
distribute a alter mysql script too? Im asking because what happens when in
a future release you add/change features and has only the new scheme in
mind forgetting the existing schemes? Inconsistency by accident? Know what I
mean?
So?
Regards
Simon
-Ursprüngliche
Had the same issue with my N95 8GB. Sometimes I see them all. Sometimes I see
ONLY one Message although I KNOW that there are more.
Simon
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Casper
Langemeijer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. März 2008 09:52
An: DBMail mailinglist
(alias) lower(deliver_to)]
Just some lines of dbmail-util... same for all binaries of dbmail.
Dbmail-conf settings for tracelevel are completely ignored. Began with the
patch. And now arrived in the rc1.
Regards
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Jorge Bastos wrote:
I changed mine to 50M, wich will mean an attach of 50M, per message,
correct?.
No. That means a maximum of 50M per attachment, not per message.
Are you storing the data straight in to a blob? or is it still base64
encoded? Is it is still
? ;)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 12:00
An: DBMail mailinglist
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Dbmail] DBMail version 2.2.10 release candidate
Simon
tracelevel has been deprecated since before 2.2.0
. ;)
Best regards
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. März 2008 14:11
An: DBMail mailinglist; DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Betreff: [Dbmail] DBMail version 2.2.10 release candidate
-BEGIN
it be better to make dbmail more
tolerant for human-errors for such a case?
Just adding the field id to that unique key would solve the issue at once.
What do you think?
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Peter Rabbitson
processings. And - personal: don’t like php very much. I prefer html4/ssi and
cgi a lot more. ;) yeah im a oldschool dog.
Regards
Simon
PS: yes, it’s a real old debate. ;)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet
without patches, it compiles successful.
Some new requirements?!
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 13:06
An: DBMail mailinglist
Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] (patch) Another case
noticed when running dbmail util after 2.2.6rc1 - 2.2.9 was
that dbmail killed 730 unconnected physmessages well, I wondered a bit
about this but since im in the same stable tree with 2.2.9 I did not suspect
dbmail doin something wrong... up to now no complains by customers.
Simon
2008 11:47:49 +0100
x-UID: b92ee197-54d9-4dc8-a2b2-26975fa9f53a
From: Constantin Film PresseService [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Simon Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 4 Mar 2008 11:47:49 +0100
Subject: DIE WELLE feiert Premiere in Berlin
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-DNSBL: 0
X-AntiSpam: Checked
Mar 3 14:08:02 primary dbmail/lmtpd[21419]: Message:[serverchild]
serverchild.c,PerformChildTask(+346): incoming connection from [127.0.0.1
(localhost)] by pid [21419]
Mar 03 14:08:02 primary dbmail-lmtpd[21419]: Error:[sql]
dbmysql.c,db_query(+290): [Duplicate entry '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
for key
instance of dbmail running (imapd,pop3d,lmtpd,timsieved) and
lmtp is exclusive storing mails (no dbmail-smtp running or using).
Regards
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet: Montag, 3. März 2008 15:42
Log of lmtpd? Or any other processes as well? Im asking since lvl5 produces
HUGE amounts of log ;)
Regards
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet: Montag, 3. März 2008 16:00
An: DBMail mailinglist
Betreff
and sieve support.
glib 1.2.10-595
glib2 2.8.1-3
gmime 2.1.16-5
regards
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Paul J Stevens
Gesendet: Montag, 3. März 2008 17:10
An: DBMail mailinglist
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Dbmail] HMM got lmtp
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Simon Gray wrote:
Do you have any plans for the db connection pooling as yet?
Sure do. The plan is as follows:
I'm well underway with making dbmail fully event-driven using libevent. This
will enable dbmail daemons to handle a lot of clients simultaneously
Well a-z and 0-9 should be all he needs.
löl is not a secure password anyway.
Just tell him that special chars (which are öäüß) are not allowed in a
password as they are not allowed in the localpart.
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
chars in passwords.
My 2 cents
Simon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Daniel Urstöger
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Januar 2008 13:49
An: DBMail mailinglist
Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] Umlaut in password not working?
Hello,
well, I just tried
Casper Langemeijer wrote:
Hi Paul,
I added deb http://debian.nfgd.net/debian stable main to my sources.list
apt-get update says: Failed to fetch
http://debian.nfgd.net/debian/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
404 Not Found
There is no binary-amd64 in dists/stable/main
I found
Paul J Stevens wrote:
The single-instance storage is pretty much done now. The next big milestone will
be some form of database connection pooling so we can scale out the number of
concurrent connected clients without draining the database backend.
Paul,
Do you have any plans for the db
Not the message itself was the topic of my posting - it was the ERROR!
So some help would be usefull. Ignoring a informational message is not what
I want. I want to eliminate the ERROR itself.
You may want to reread my original post?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
