Anyone else been hearing of problems sending to multiple recipients in the
rage of 90 or more? I am running v1.25a with JM and HJ installed. My low
bar for HJ is 50, high bar is 500 b/c I have one customer who absolutely
insists she has to send her newsletter out to at least 300 people from one
Hey Scott,
Just throwing an idea out there, since most spam mail hits multiple
addresses in the same server, often as seperate messages, how about a failed
message cache that could automatically fail a message if it failed in the
last hour or some other configurable time span? It would probably
Scott,
Along the lines of undocumneted tests, is ADULT another test in beta? I saw
it on your recently cught spam page.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM
To:
I am running pro and use my mailbox as a test box for tests before setting
the default filters for all other users, and would like to test the
undocumented tests out, are there any others, have you thought about making
a uae at your own risk list for the more daring lot out here?
To me, your
Scott,
I recieved some spam that was processed by the $default$.junkmail file when
there is a cmfrolick.junkmail file to process my mail, and I am running the
pro version. Below is a snipet from the log file.
10/24/2001 10:03:18 Qd82914c 000615 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott,
In the release notes you mention that HEUR has been set to have mutliple
levels. How does this benefit us? Does a level 1 return a weight of 1 and
so on?
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R.
Scott,
Would it be possible to list at least the common codes for some of your
tests? I had a customer ask about SPAMHEADERS today, I found the answer in
my archives of the list, but if we had a list of common ones, it would be
nice.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
---
This E-mail came
Scott,
I noticed a number of list servers, including Ipwitch's, fail the HEUR test
horribly, but others don't trip it at all. (the non weighted version of the
test) What would a list server need to do to keep scores low?
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
---
This E-mail came from the
Scott,
I was just looking to see if Declude had generated any declude.gp? files,
and discovered that c:\ is littered with 28MB of *.pid files. They date
back to before I switched to 1.29, and I did not install 1.28. I do have
the PIDDEBUG option set to on, and it correctly generates them in
have been poor seeing as how
(from their perspective) we had already ruined
their day!
--- elp2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
Can Hijack be whitelisted?
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Might be easier to make a seperate test that uses regular expression test.
This would give us more control, and we could build more complex whitelist
and blacklist entries. Just a thought.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Have you ever tried Windows Scripting Host? It runs both VBScript(Which I
have written many very useful utilities in), and JScript(JavaScript Clone),
and if that's not enough, go to
http://www.activestate.com/Products/Language_Distributions/ and download
Perl, Tcl, or Python to add to the fun.
Don't know how much to trust it, but MS states that their SMTP service is
designeg so that you cna build third party filters then use it to forward to
your other servers, I believe you can even use rules in the filters to
forward to different servers. Might be worth a look. Might even be a way
The issue is specific to his domain, since I use Savvis for my backbone, I
thought it best to check, and everything is fine for my block 209.144.1.0/24
in both servers.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott
Along the lines of Hijack, I still occasionally get customers complaining of
mail disappearing when the send to a large number of recipients in a single
email, usually in the order of 80 or more. I have a tough time convincing
customers to break up messages and it does not seem to be universal.
I created a vbscript that is called by task scheduler that sends out an
email if either hold has messages. I attached it zipped up.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002
Sounds like you want a program that is like SpamCop for your server, sounds
cool actually. It could integrate with Imail's black lists or Declude's. You
could use a program alias in Imail to dump to the parser. Wish I had the
time to write it.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original
I agree, it should definately not be a simple 'if they submit it, add it'
program, it needs to have a database involved with some form of statistics,
it's not a simple project, and it would need some way of controlling false
or bad reports. It would have to be a single site version of the
One problem, I recieve very legitimate email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], that is
sent to abuse@ for all domains thought to be involved for spammers and other
issues. There are cases where someone is just trying to get ahold of
several parties using standard addresses like abuse, hostmaster,
I feel very fortunate, all we ever recieved were emails asking how to better
use the spam tags to get the junk out of their box. Some customers didn't
even notice, even after we sent an email explaining the service, they called
wanting to know what to do about the spam, we told them to filter on
Scott,
It would be nice to have a similar feature to the WHITELIST TODOMAIN feature
that could impose an action to all email bound for a domain. I currently
use CATCHALL to bounce all email to a suspended domain with a nice little
Temporarily not available message, which gets customer's
I have Imail 6.06 and have had a few of reports from customers claiming to
be getting someone else's email, however it is rare, and harder to track
since they almost always delete the email before letting us know. This makes
sense as to what may have happened, not saying it was, but it is
To solve that problem and postmaster bounces to bad addresses (spammers
sending to full or non-existing mailboxes) I wrote a script that scans the
spool for the bounce messages and removes them from queue after 3 failed
delivery attempts, my default is 24 attempts. This virtually eliminated
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 6:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Could you explain HELOBOGUS?
When this happens, it's a configuration error on the other end of the
Scott,
How would it handle a mailbox with a forward to address defined? i.e. If
alias@domain1 was a mailbox, but had the forward list of alias@domain2.
Just curious, since Imail will not leave a copy on forward unless you use
.,email@domain.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original
The adult test has very few hits, even for blatantly adult emails. Probably
one out of every 15-20 porn ads gets caught, and I subscribe to some joke
lists with frequent crude jokes, and they are rarely tagged. The idea about
using the FILTER test with a well designed filter will probably be
Scott,
Not sure how feasible it is, but a large number of spam mails contain a URL
with an IP address (http://127.0.0.1/), I know legitimate mail can too, but
as a weighted test it could be useful. I was thinking as part of the filter
test, but even as a stand alone test it might work. Most of
I know this has been mentioned here before, referencing an article about it,
but I just went poking around on ftc.gov and found they have a section
dedicated to spam that allows consumers to file complaints as well as gives
information about what they can do to reduce spam on their own. I looked
OK, just checking to see if anyone else had this. My logs look like this.
07/10/2002 23:59:59 Q10cc20e 001137 OSRELAY:5 SPAMCOP:10 BADHEADERS:5
nWEIGHT5:9 nWEIGHT10:14 nWEIGHT15:19 nWEIGHT20:29 nTAG5:9 nTAG10:14
nTAG15:19 . Total weight = 133
07/10/2002 23:59:59 Q10cc20e 001137 Msg failed
From what I have read, in Win2k terminal services cannot connect to the
console session, however the next release of server will include this
capability, so will have remote control rather than a mere terminal. Many
programs have the same issue since the default action for a service that
Along a similar line, can outgoing rules be per domain? If so, how would we
do that?
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
You probably could instead, make it add an additional X-Note: header that
indicates postfix had to repair the headers and filter on this. It would not
be a bad idea if all mail servers indicated when they had to repair broken
headers.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From:
I do have one question, how do you manage the size of the spam folder when
they use that option? I would love to use the MAILBOX action, but have no
way of cleaning out the spam folder without affecting the other folders,
including inbox, as well. We currently do not use aging as a restriction
Scott,
Is there any trick to getting declude queue to work? I came in to work to
see 5000+ messages in my spool directory, and a bunch of popups since the
machine ran out of memory and could no longer allocate space to the new
processes. It has happened in the past several times, not real
I always figured since my hotmail profile says I'm male and over 21 that's
why it gets about 160 spam mails (that don't fail their spam filters) per
week. Don't they do the same thing Juno mail does and pay for the service
by selling the address to 'Advertising Partners'? My 17 year old sister
It does fail to recognize that ISP's, and especially Hosting Providers,
often have people using their email from work or, in the case of personal
domains, from another service provider, which means their test messages from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be from a foreign IP. But as
: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request
That's what I did...using the address list, I give it a weight of -140,
which is more than the total of ALL of my tests added together...
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Wednesday
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request
Would you mind sharing your list? Mine, sadly enough, only has 8 rules
As far as the clearing the spambox goes, IMail includes a program that can
clear old mail, unfortunately it clears all mailboxes found in a directory
recursively. I have looked into writing a utility to do the same but be
direct able at individual .mbx files, but the problem comes from the two
Have you tried making both of them a group alias, and point them to the same
text file? This will make it so you only have to edit the one file and both
aliases point to the same mail boxes. It also makes it scriptable for edits,
it you really need to go that far.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
I wrote a very simple batch file that runs nightly and holds mail for up to
10 days, alternately you could use a program called xxcopy that can delete,
copy, or move files based on age. I included the batch file, zipped up.
Nothing special, no extra programs needed.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
I am working on a web based held message review app that allows customers to
redeliver false positives or delete the spam on their own. I have a test
mailbox set up and a basic info page.
The app is at http://spmareview.argolink.net, the test box is
[EMAIL PROTECTED], pass is demo.
The info page
Ok, Sounds like everyone is building a tool of some sort, might no hurt to
get some collaboration going. I recently posted a link to a spam reviewing
ASP app, and I am working on a way to modify the users rules files to filter
based on a standard declude config. If any ASP developers want a look
The owner of my company also has another company in the office, and they all
send out as the group alias and CC the group alias so everyone has a
complete copy of communications with customers. No one can say I didn't
know what he said to the customer.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original
I use Sawmill fro my customers web stats, and for custom stats for internal
use, it is an excellent product.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Dan Cummings
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM
I'd stay with their current, and you'll either have to build your own filter
for Declude logs or ask them to build it for you, they will for registered
users without a charge, and if it is a common log format add it to their
permanent list. The different levels of info used in the various Declude
Ok, I just uploaded a new revision to my Spambox App.
The URL is http://spamreview.argolink.net
email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pass is demo
Info at http://spamreview.argolink.net/doc
It now has full capability to manage settings per user. A few more issues to
resolve and I will look at packaging it
I have an updated, almost ready for beta, version up now. Please have a look
and let me know what you think.
My next update message should be to notify of a downloadable beta (full
source), then hopefully a workable freeware release.
Again, the info.
http://spamreview.argolink.net
user: [EMAIL
I am working on an interface to control Imail rules to hold or delete mail
based on rankings from weight tests in declude. I have 6 seperate ranks of
spam from NONE (which as always can include misses) to VHIGH. It's not very
pretty right now, but it is fuctional. I plan on adding fuctionality,
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Web App Released
I have posted a copy of my SpamReview web app for download. It is
sourceware, modify to your needs. I will provide as much support
I just posted asp source to my app which is similar in concept to Tom's,
except it also has a spambox to manage held spam for the user. I know
some people have looked at it, but I haven't received any feedback yet.
It aollows for management of the spam messages separate from Imail's
aging since
Does anyone know if any of the Imail log analyzers reports number of
good and bad deliveries by remote servers? I want to look at
blacklisting remote addresses that send high percentage of messages to
invalid addresses. These are most likely from mailing lists and
therefore likely spam. I keep
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklisting based on % of bad addresses
Does anyone know if any of the Imail log analyzers reports number of
good and bad deliveries by remote servers? I want
This is a very naive approach. If it deals with billing, it will need
lots of legislation, tax law consideration, it will cause the owner of
the phone number or email to deal with taxes for the collected income.
Not to mention the crack pots that will say it is $10,000 to place an
unwanted call
Great a patch for a very old issue is going to cost me $600 to get a new
service agreement for other upgrades I didin't want. (Still running
6.06, patch is for 7.13, funny how ver.7 has had 13 revisions and no
where near ver.8, ver.6 only needed 6)
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original
Scott,
Is the REDIRECT statement processes per domain as well or only on the
global $default$.junkmail file? I have redirects for several addresses
in our primary domain, but I need to have a different set of actions for
all of our hosting accounts, so I have per domain set up for our primary
If you get the right software Win32 DNS doesn't need a lot of machine
either. I run win2k on a dual p150 and a ppro200. Both machines only
have 128MB RAM, I run Simple DNS Plus by jhsoft.com, no problems, that's
with running a small ISP and hosting over 200 domains in DNS. Plus the
software is
Scott,
Would it be possible to get a little more info on what is logged at the
different levels, ERROR, WARNING, and DEBUG are pretty self explanatory,
and probably rarely used, but I'm unclear on the differences between
LOW, MID, and HIGH.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
---
[This E-mail
I was really looking for even a basic list of additional lines, but
that's ok, I'll just capture logs at the different levels and figure it
out the old fashioned way.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.
I have an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED] that points to several
addresses. For some reason the first address never recieves the email,
there are no imail rules set up either globally or for the address and
the ldeliver line says it is delivered to NUL. The only other odd thing
is for some reason in
Scott,
If an external test was the last one defined would the following work?
MYTEST external nonzero c:\mytest.exe %TESTSFAILED% 0 0
The reason is, I'm thinking about creating an app to plot the hit rate
for my tests, but I want to make it a data gatherer rather than a log
analyzer (spreads out
This is not an uncommon problem. From what I know, Imail 7.x still has
it. In my research, I have not found a tool to clear just one folder in
a mailbox based on date, but I did develop an application to manage spam
using a combination of weighting, Imail rules, and an external server
software
One problem with held or bounced mail that notifies the intended
recipient that it was blocked, is, you did not elimiate the spam, only
change it's contents to hundreds of notifications of unwanted mail.
This will get very old, very fast, and lead to the blacklists you are
trying to avoid.
]] On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Charles Frolick
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain?
Reply to: Charles Frolick
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain? on Friday
9:35:39 AM
We already capture most spam and virus using
Scott,
How about a small executable that talks to console the same way
Declude.exe does to send a release signal?
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:03
I have made available a new util for all to use. It produces MRTG like
graphs of failed Junkmail tests as well as the message count. I have
also created a web page for all of my utils to be downloaded.
http://spamreview.argolink.net/software/.
If you want to see the graphs it can make go to
I forgot to mention that the stats grapher works from log level LOW on
up, although I did not test DEBUG, I do not forsee an issue.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Friday
Has anyone else noticed bad log lines in the JM log? I will get a short
spurt of partial log entries, usually without a newline to separate
them, occasionally just the end of an entry on a line by itself. Never
seems to last more than a minute. It can really mess with log analysis.
Thanks,
Chuck
Ok, I do not see F-prot on the F-secure site at all, and F-secure
antivirus is $80 for personal edition, $424 for the server edition, and
I so not see mention of 20 user license.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.
]] On Behalf Of
Charles Frolick
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot
Ok, I do not see F-prot on the F-secure site at all, and
F-secure antivirus is $80 for personal edition, $424 for the
server edition, and I so not see
He could also use
WEIGHT02 weightmatch x x 2 0
Since weightmatch matches exactly that weight. I will recommend using
little bit bigger catch boxes though.
I think you will get a very good picture by having ranges set up along
these lines:
WEIGHT00-04 weightrange x x 0
It's not Declude and Imail that's the problem, it's the extreme number
of postmaster messages balling up in your spool that will never be
delivered. At least that has been my experience, I'm in the same boat
(small isp ~6,000 accounts but 60k - 80k messages per day). I wrote a
utility to help
Scott,
Since IPNOTINMX only has use when it passes, there is no way to add a
header using WARN, and it doesn't show up in %FAILEDTESTS% (obviously),
so the problem is, it adjusts the weight but unless you go to the log
file, you don't know for shure it did. Is there a way to make it show
up in
with no reverse DNS entry.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.109.193.64]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com)
for spam.
X-Spam-Weight: 20
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BADHEADERS, HELOBOGUS, IPNOTINMX, REVDNS, WEIGHT05,
WEIGHT10, WEIGHT15, WEIGHT20
Dave
Charles
I agree as an ISP that SPAMCOP alone does not work, but as a corporate
email, it might be considerably different, positive or negative.
Another test you might consider is SpamChk, I just started using it and
it makes a huge difference in my mail box, I do need to tune it though,
it trapps my Daily
I see you updated it recently, I was killing myself yesterday to
remember the name of Spammanager, had to search the archives. Also,
could you include a link to my add-ons site
http://spamreview.argolink.net/software, I have several tools there, one
is the zipfile for the Hijack notifier. As I
Thank you, it is a nice way to see how the filters are doing, and it
keeps the data set small, all 28 of my tests take up less than a meg to
store (rrd's are created at their final size).
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Delog is good, there is a thread about a beta log analyzer Log Analyzer
- Comments Needed, sounds real promising. You might check those out. I
seem to remember there being others, but can't think of them off hand.
The only other one is Netcomm LogTool, but I don't think you want to
spend $200
Hey scott, ever thought about adding a special action keyword like
FORCE, to force an action in the odd situation where you want to
override the the severity scale? It would only need to be handled in the
.junkmail files.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From:
Has anyone else been seeing messages where the body is in the headers? I
have a n example below. Just started happening, and since declude
appends to the end, the body shows blank in Outlook.
Bad MSG
Received: from 202.88.150.30 [202.88.150.30] by argolink.net
(SMTPD32-6.06) id
I looked through those since I use Savvis as well and have been very
pleased. It looks like most where DNS servers serving spamvertised
domains, the first one was used to relay mail through a router in what
sounds like a bad router design, but is a webmail company who may not
have secured their
Sounds like this test might be a good negative weight test like
IPNOTINMX. Of course if they use a good mailfrom it could reduce the
positive. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott
This should not be an issue since Habeas headers implies they are
adhereing to the strict rules put forth by Habeas, and had to pay for
the right to use them, if they are in violation, report them to Habeas,
who will take legal action against topica.com for violating the
agreement.
Thanks,
Chuck
The online docs and the mailing list archives tends to be a very good
reference, however since the program is so flexible, even Scott doesn't
know it's full potential. There are often threads where people have
managed to come up with some new and unforseen way of using Declude.
Now, that being
My only thought is, by some weird chance a spammer is using a real
return adress (I know that is truly funny), they would be able
troubleshoot the fails by sending to an invalid email address or a known
full mailbox and simply read the headers in the standard bounce message.
But I think this is a
Here is an interesting article on spam from the legitimate marketer's
perspective.
http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2003/03/31/story4.html
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
I built a simple VBScript for alerting if mail gets held in the Hijack
hold folders, it wouldn't take much to make it alert if number of Q
files in Overflow exceeds a threshhold or if any files exist at all. It
is available at http://spamreview.argolink.net/software, called the
Hijack Held
If you read the article they link to, it is a combination of challenge
response and virtual addresses, complete with the problems of not one,
but both anti-spam systems. They did do some interesting things, but
still seems like more work to deal with than most users will tolerate
over the long
Scott,
Have you thought about using Declude Console as a short term dns cache
for Declude? I think the results Kami is seeing is because Ipswitch
included a DNS cache in the new Queue Manager, and their ip4r test may
be using it instead of the DNS. Declude could definitely benefit from
it since
I use weightrange to define 6 distinct levels of spam (the last one
actually is just weight so anything over is caught). Then all I do is
add a header X-SPAM-Level: TESTNAME. End result is what you are asking
for, just use stars instead of TESTNAME.
Global.cfg
SPAM-NONE weightrange
Speaking of logging, would it be possible to add using a syslog daemon
as an option, I don't know off hand if it will save any processing
power, but it seems like it might since you will no longer have to
manage log file resources (locking, checking creation, destination
folder). It would
They are all applied. The trick is, so far there are very few, and only
recently used, negative if pass tests. It might not be hard for Declude
to add a %TESTPASSED% variable, but if you use a lot of tests, this will
be a very long list, especially for good email. It has been suggested
for them
Would you mind sharing your two lists? I would like to be more
aggressive with SPAMDOMAINS, but I know the FP potential.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003
I thought Win2003 was supposed to have added console access to Terminal
Services (I have some recollection that you are running 2003, could be
wrong though)? If you are not running 2003, just install VNC for the
occasions you need console access. That's what I had to do.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
I don't know what they did, and it is running as a service, but,
SimpleDNS Plus by jhsoftware.com had a similar issue with the need for
console access, however they found a way around it in their beta version
(not publicly released thought). I may have to poke at it a bit to see
if I can figure it
You don't have to leave it logged on, you can log in and out remotely
with VNC, you can even lock out the local inputs while in remote mode.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent:
Scott,
I had someone point out that two addresses in my range (209.144.1.100,
209.144.1.14) are listed in ORDB, I went to DNSStuff.com and the lookup
tool said they were not, bud a direct query of ORDB shows them. I know
the l;istings are old, from 2001, and neither IP is in use for mail, so
I
When I wrote the stats grapher app, I ran across the same problem at all
log levels (I generally run MID). When I mentioned it on the list, some
otheres who wrote log analyzers had noticed the same thing. I'm sure it
has to do with the volume of mail received, since more mail means more
declude
I love email, I received your reply about an hour and a half before I
received my post, and the headers show the delay was in delivery to my
mail server from declude.com, yet I received 4 other posts between.
Don't worry about finding what happened, I'm sure it is temporary errors
(my server busy)
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
