[Declude.JunkMail] Interesting test results

2003-03-24 Thread brian
thought this would make an interesting topic for discussion. Brian Milburn --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas headers

2003-03-25 Thread brian
Several porn spammers are also using them. They claim that they are using verified opt-in lists, however we have seen several reports from customers that claim they never opted-in for any adult oriented material, however may have for other things. They are apparently buying their opt-in lists

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager/Declude Setup!

2003-03-25 Thread brian
It is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll check that. It is supposed to be sending this out in the welcome message. On 03/25/03 4:11pm you wrote... John, I subscribed to that list when I bought the product, but I do not see anywhere what email address to send to the list with. Sincerely, Grant Griffith,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Year 2020

2003-03-27 Thread brian
I had a program that checked a time server every day to keep the time accurate. On more than one occasion I saw the date get changed to the year 2020 and the year 4040. I don't use time server programs any more. On 03/27/03 12:09pm you wrote... I have seen random date changes when the battery

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Recent Message From Declude.JunkMail-owner@declude.com?

2003-06-06 Thread brian
Me too. On 06/06/03 11:39am you wrote... I received something weird. It was like the headers only. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...

2003-05-27 Thread brian
Yep, now that I think about it, I think you did. That was a few days ago, a lot of brain cells must have evaporated since then ;) On 05/27/03 7:59pm you wrote... Scott, does IMail do it's ip4r checking after the whole message is received and the connection terminated or does check

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question

2003-06-11 Thread brian
for giving negative weights to pattern matches that have words like Shipping Tax and Total within say 120 characters of each other indicating it is probably a receipt or invoice for something. Brian On 06/11/03 4:06pm you wrote... Short answer, I love it. I have been using it since it was first

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question

2003-06-11 Thread brian
Hi Fred, Sure, I'll be posting a message here, probably tomorrow. Brian On 06/11/03 8:07pm you wrote... Brian let me know when you are ready, I would like to try it. Thanks. Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question

2003-06-12 Thread brian
. For the IMail stand alone version, pricing is determined by the number of users your are receiving mail for. For the Declude version, it is a flat fee for unlimited use. Licensing costs are available at http://www.alligate.com/imail/pricing.htm Thanks again, Brian Milburn Solid Oak Software

[Declude.JunkMail] OT - Challenge/Response Systems

2003-06-14 Thread brian
messages of it's own. He notices that there are several hundred Challenge and bounce messages going both ways repeatedly after a few hours, and he has to shut it down and kill the reply accounts to stop the loop. Don't know if it actually stopped any spam ;) Brian --- [This E-mail was scanned

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tar Pitting

2003-06-18 Thread brian
Alligate does it :) (The gateway version anyway) On 06/18/03 3:25pm you wrote... It would be less, assuming that IMail can handle it (and that your firewall can do the tarpitting). I'm not aware of any firewalls that can do true SMTP tarpitting (which requires sending short bits of data

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tar Pitting

2003-06-18 Thread brian
for this and don't have enough machines here to create that many connections. We have been able to get up to about 1200 or so. Brian On 06/18/03 3:39pm you wrote... I find the idea intriguing as well but if you start to slow down connections wouldnt that just hold TCP connections open longer

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tar Pitting

2003-06-18 Thread brian
, it is probably not a fair comparison, however weren't really trying to benchmark the servers, only our product. We were able to deliver all messages successfully to the IMail server despite the reboots and problems, and that was more the point of the test. Brian On 06/18/03 3:37pm you wrote

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Postage

2003-07-08 Thread brian
Yep, we did too. A couple of them. Can't wait to sign up for this one ;-) On 07/08/03 1:17am you wrote... Anyone else get this?: =Dear Sir/Madam I would like to inquire if you would be interested in incorporating email postage support to your product. It will allow

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL..

2003-07-27 Thread brian
Why don't you guys give it a rest. On 07/27/03 8:53pm you wrote... - Original Message - From: Smart Business Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New spamcop style RBL.. Sunday, July 27,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking attachments

2003-08-19 Thread brian
Here's 2... MESSAGE.ZIP YOUR_DETAILS.ZIP Although they are really viruses. On 8/19/2003 12:30pm you wrote... Just double checking, but we do NOT have a way to block specific attachments in Declude JM Pro, correct ? Correct (because we're not yet aware of spammers that are attaching files

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate vs. Message Sniffer...opinions?

2003-08-20 Thread brian
their business. Brian --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http

Re: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OSRELAY question.

2003-08-27 Thread brian
at http://www.alligate.com/pricing.htm Thanks again, Brian Milburn Solid Oak Software --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SMTP Relay Limit

2003-09-10 Thread brian
Look at http://www.alligate.com On 09/10/03 3:20pm you wrote... Should have been more specific, I'm looking for something used by larger ISPs that gives me the confidence of volume and stability. Something attached to a name and a phone number I can call when there's a problem. I don't mind

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header question: X-Accutrak:

2003-09-12 Thread brian
I haven't seen any spam. Walmart uses this for their newsletters, don't know about others. We negative weight this already. Brian On 09/12/03 10:10am you wrote... When ever I see this in the header, it is associated with a legit newsletter. Any one see the same, or see spam with this header

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate

2003-10-10 Thread brian
and provide free tech support until we are working with the same code base for both versions of the product. Brian Milburn Solid Oak Software On 10/10/2003 12:20pm you wrote... FYI -Original Message- From: Brian Milburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:05 PM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude behind a Firewall

2003-11-05 Thread brian
Ok, here you go... discounts are only available on multiple server installations. Single server installations are always the same price for everyone. You can download the latest version of Alligate anytime at: http://www.alligate.com/downloads.asp Here are your Alligate activation codes:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] November 2003 Spam Statistics

2003-12-05 Thread brian
into our mail servers to test. The new test platforms will allow us to move some domains out of the normal loop and we will be able to update the Declude version again (shortly we hope). Brian On 12/04/03 4:34pm you wrote... I *believe* I spoke to Chris. If it wasn't dump it was drop. I didn't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] November 2003 Spam Statistics

2003-12-05 Thread brian
Here are the stats for Tuesday. Wednesday and Thursday we were testing some things the stats were skewed. This was for our main solidoak.com domain mail server (general business, not tech support). Our tech support server lets more spam through, however we can only do limited header type spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Keyword

2005-11-30 Thread Brian
anything? Thanks, Brian - Original Message - From: Matt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 8:53 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Keyword Richard,That is going to be something that only the logs can tell you when you do things this way, and you would need

[Declude.JunkMail] Nigerian Spam

2005-12-07 Thread Brian
Anyone have a list of keywords that effectively stops the Nigerianspam emails that you would be willing to share? Thanks, Brian

[Declude.JunkMail] OT - SMTP Gateway

2005-12-28 Thread Brian
or Smartermail. We are currently finishing the GUI to control the gateway and then it will be ready for release to beta users. The target date is Jan 10, 2006. Please take a look at the info page above and if there is any interest, please feel free to contact me directly. Thanks Brian Milburn Solid Oak

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - SMTP Gateway

2005-12-29 Thread Brian
ever asked us to do this, and I simply felt that by doing so I could contribute to the Declude community in this way. Since I own the company, these costs basically come out of my pocket. I am disappointed that you feel my contribution is unworthy. Brian -Original Message- Rather

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

2006-01-17 Thread Brian
, that it can only be sent to their address prior to the spam checks? I hope this makes sense. Thanks in advance, Brian T. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

2006-01-17 Thread Brian
Irecall that happening with IMail as well. That is why I was wondering if I did something wrong before. Brian - Original Message - From: Shayne Embry To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:12 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

2006-01-17 Thread Brian
What are you using for a hold weight and delete weight? Brian - Original Message - From: IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:17 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address I can confirm

[Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread Brian
/smtpgateway.htm Help and Screenshots: http://www.alligate.com/help/Default.htm Thanks, Brian Milburn Solid Oak Software

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-26 Thread Brian
Anyone willing to share more info on this? Timetable? Thanks, Brian T. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway Plans for a gateway version

MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update v1.0.21

2002-03-20 Thread Brian Watters
Tom, Attempted to dn/load and its asking for a user and pass Brian R. Watters Senior Director of Information Technologies Totlcom BroadBand Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] WireLess EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.totlcombroadband.com 559-420.0205 559-454-7634 fax This message and any

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH action and the spamattach.eml file...

2002-04-25 Thread Brian Watters
Ok .. So where does one learn on how to use the ATTACH action .. I must be looking in all the wrong places .. Also can someone tell us why you would want to use SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS .. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John

[Declude.JunkMail] ISP Users and Sample JunkMail config files

2002-08-29 Thread Brian Watters
Hello all, We would like to see some sample real world config files for ISP's, If others out there are using configs that work for there environments then there is little reason for the rest of us to re-invent the wheel .. Come on folks share! Brian --- [Scanned for viruses with safE-Mail

DSN:RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread Brian Milburn
;declude.com] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery If you are interested in a Declude 'external test' for adult oriented material, we will be releasing a product for Declude/iMail and other MTAs soon

DSN:RE: RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-08 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi John, I am pretty sure you can be assured of that. We deal with a lot of small ISPs and hosting companies now and always try to keep value high and expense low. On 11/08/02 11:59am you wrote... Hopefully, there will be a tiered pricing structure for smaller companies, such as small hosting

DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-12 Thread Brian Milburn
to begin the Linux translation by Dec 1, so the feature set and program defaults are not locked down as yet. Let me know and I will send you the files and a license key. Brian On 11/08/02 1:45pm you wrote... Great. Please keep us posted on the progress. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager

DSN:RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adultery

2002-11-12 Thread Brian Milburn
Ok, it is being sent to your email address. On 11/12/02 12:44pm you wrote... Brian, I would like to test it as well! Patrick Childers Network Administrator Hussey, Gay, Bell DeYoung Inc. 329 Commercial Drive Savannah, GA 31406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Message for Scott

2002-11-12 Thread Brian Milburn
to about 10-15 of your users this morning completely forgetting about the declude.exe problem. Is the fixed version of Declude available to all users? If so, maybe you could post the address here so it won't look like we send out software that doesn't work;-) Thanks, I appreciate it. Brian Milburn

[Declude.JunkMail] DSN:CYBERsitter NoXMail List

2002-11-13 Thread Brian Milburn
this afternoon that implements some new spam detection tests that help reduce false positives as well as the inclusion of a couple of suggestions we received from users. Thanks again, and thanks to Scott for providing an extensible product with Declude JunkMail! Brian Milburn Solid Oak Software

DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BASE64 test

2002-11-19 Thread Brian Milburn
Not when they are the text portions of the message. If you look at a complex raw email message, there may be several message parts. These can be BASE64 encoded files of any type. All the message parts are essentially contained in the message body. It is up to the client application to separate

[Declude.JunkMail] BlackList Limit ?

2002-11-21 Thread Brian Cunningham
Is there a limit on the number of addresses that I can blacklist within a FROMFILE? Thanks. b --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail]

2002-11-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
winmail.dat

DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in SPAMCOP listing

2002-11-27 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi John, I have noticed this as well. Yesterday Spamcop failed several legitimate messages from AOL users. Maybe they are not clearing out the false reports as regularly as they normally do because of the holiday week. -Brian On 11/27/02 6:51am you wrote... Has any one else noticed

DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] osirusoft down?

2003-01-07 Thread Brian Milburn
, especially in January. Brian On 01/07/03 5:56pm you wrote... Is anyone having problems using relays.osirusoft.com and relays.ordb.org? Should I comment these out in the global.cfg file to avoid excessive timeouts? It's a temporary problem due to the Santa Monica Winds in California, which

DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude in PCMag

2003-01-24 Thread Brian Milburn
Nah, we've been in there a bunch of times and all you get is calls from people wanting to know if you have a Mac version! Just kidding, congratulations Scott! Brian On 01/24/03 3:52pm you wrote... Congratulations, Scott. Declude is mentioned in PCMag, latest February 25th Issue, page 95

RE: (4, ):[Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists

2003-02-08 Thread Brian Clover
. Brian Clover -Original Message- From: Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 12:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (4, ):[Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Scott and all, We have the ability to develop a whitelist by domain now, how about the ability to create

DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitlist Compiler

2003-02-08 Thread Brian Milburn
Hmmm... somebody stole my thunder! We added Smart Whitelisting to CYBERsitter SpamManager for the final release. It automatically (optionally) adds the recipients address to the users personal whitelist. $27,000 ?? Jeepers! Somebody's got a lot of VC guys to pay off! On 02/08/03 10:16am you

DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Brian Milburn
I seldom comment on this list, but this is something I know a little about. We have published security software since 1990 and our most popular product, CYBERsitter, since 1996. With over 2.5m users, we have seen it all. Because it records all browsing activity, there are many cases where we have

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Brian Milburn
On 02/27/03 9:32am you wrote... I'll trust you on that, and apologize for the roundhouse classification. Yet in your several dozen cases where divorces were contemplated, employee terminations took place, even people who were sent back to prison and kids who have been

Re: DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitlist Compiler

2003-02-28 Thread Brian Milburn
returns result codes for Declude JunkMail. It is much less expensive. On 02/28/03 12:24pm you wrote... Hello, Brian, Is there a link on the web somewhere to CYBERsitter SpamManager? I can't seem to find it. Also,would you consider this product a competing product to Declude.JunkMail? Thanks, Dan

RE: DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitlist Compiler

2003-02-28 Thread Brian Milburn
SpamManager returns negative results for adult and positive results for spam. John has some good test definitions that I am sure he will share. On 02/28/03 7:41pm you wrote... There is a Declude specific version of SpamManager now available that does not have all the bells and whistles and

[Declude.JunkMail] How did this Spammer get through?

2003-03-12 Thread Brian Cunningham
PROTECTED]/the.jpg width=3D536= height=3D505 /asalute beacon stumpweapon gapbr%RA= NDOM_WORDhum implantation party dish/body/html --15978B3_057.85AE_.850_-- How is he successfully getting through? Also, how can I block him from coming through again? Thanks. Brian -Original

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this Spammer get through?

2003-03-12 Thread Brian Cunningham
Here you go: 03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] HELO 208.253.112.160 03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this Spammer get through?

2003-03-12 Thread Brian Cunningham
What's strange is that the only thing consistent around all of the spam emails is the IP address 169.207.38.237, which is listed with SpamCop. Should declude pick that up? I've got spamcop listed as an automatic hold, but somehow he keeps getting through. Thanks. b -- Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
I've checked, and the Hijack is registered. The config is set to: RELAYTHRESHOLD1 10 20 RELAYTHRESHOLD2 30 60 And the log files have not held anything today. Everything went through as OK with juat a couple not local users. But I see that [EMAIL PROTECTED] now has about 300 outgoing

SPAMCOP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
Thanks Scott. I've emailed you the file. We do have a few ALLOWIP's, but I they are for IP's we own. I checked the W log files and it looks like they are coming in through web messaging (god knows how they are sending that much email through web messaging) under several IP's ranging from

SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
I've got you up until the DAISYCHAIN ipsmtp.exe point. Do you want me to rename the two files and then add the daisychain line above to the config file of hijack? Thanks. b -- Original Message -- From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL

SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
Will renaming declude.exe to smtp32.exe cause problems with junkmail or virus? Do I need to rename or make a copy of declude.exe as renamed? b -- Original Message -- From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 26 Mar

SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
Scott, I made these changes and restarted services. But then I stopped receiving emails. When I reverted back, I'm now receiving emails again. Any thoughts? Thanks. b -- Original Message -- From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL

Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
The reverse dns is because of a nat'ing scheme we have behind two firewalls and a load director (posts in the past have already described our config). The freaking SpamCop is because I apparently have Spammers sending an incredible amount of spam through our web messaging (i.e. bypassing hijack

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
I've made the changes, but did not make the registry change. I'll let you guys know what happens. In regards to the web messaging possible trap, Do I really need to up the limits for hijack? It's always been my understanding that web messaging shouldn't send out as much email as frequently

RE: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
I've made the changes below, but the SMTP service on Imail wouldn't start back up. b -Original Message- From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:06 AM To: Brian Cunningham Subject: Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? I made

RE: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
Should I be using the SMTP32.exe or the SMTPd32.exe for this process? Thanks. b -Original Message- From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:06 AM To: Brian Cunningham Subject: Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? I made

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
-Original Message- From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:06 AM To: Brian Cunningham Subject: Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? I made these changes and restarted services. But then I stopped receiving emails. Try

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
I gotcha. That could be a problem. We do have about 5000 + web mail users. Could this explain why when I make the changes email stops being delivered? I've checked the hold(s) and there is nothing being held, but maybe the processing is delaying delivery? b -Original Message- From:

SPAMCOP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
Gotcha. I've been using SMTP32.exe (not the daemon). I just wanted to check because every time I make the change it stops delivery (even after I roll the SMTP service within Imail, which does start up successfully). b -- Original Message -- From: R.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System

2003-08-01 Thread Brian T
Me too. Brian T. - Original Message - From: Russ Uhte (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System If you would like to try it out let me know and I will make it available

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Server Gone Wild

2003-12-02 Thread Brian T
This is Brian Thompson with an update: Mail server appears to be back up and running. Thanks for all the help. Still don't know what the problem was, but my declude log shows no entries from 4:23 pm until 11:58 pm. - Original Message - From: Glen Harvy [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests

2004-01-15 Thread Brian T
AHBL-DUL FIVETEN-SPAM FIVETEN-BULK FIVETEN-MULTISTAGE FIVETEN-SPAMSUPPORT FIVETEN-MISC NJABL-DYNABLOCK NJABL-RELAYS NJABL-DUL NJABL-SOURCES NJABL-MULTI NJABL-FORMMAIL NJABL-PROXIES Thank you for your time. Brian Thompson Online Services --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

[Declude.JunkMail] yahoo.com

2006-02-16 Thread Brian Baker
-(0D4C) SMTP_DELIV_FAILED Does this relate to the domain key issue, or ?? Thanks Brian Baker

[Declude.JunkMail] Upgrades Concerns

2006-10-27 Thread Brian T.
I am getting ready to update Imail to version 8.2x. I presently have declude version 1.82. Are there any concerns, compatabilty issues or other potential problems with running Declude 1.82 and Imail 8.2x? I don't want to have to fix Declude as well as Imail. Thanks in advance, Brian T

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrades Concerns

2006-10-31 Thread Brian T.
not leave a message. Any one have any ideas to try and fix the problem. Thanks in advance, Brian T. - Original Message - From: Mike N To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:55 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrades Concerns

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrades Concerns

2006-10-31 Thread Brian T.
How can I contact someone at Declude as far as a sales person? I really need to get this working. Brian T. - Original Message - From: David Barker To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:38 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading - which version?

2006-10-31 Thread Brian T.
David, Can you possibly have someone from sales call me? Thanks, Brian T. 740-397-4800 - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:05 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading - which version

[Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading Declude Configs - Which Tests are valid?

2006-11-01 Thread Brian T.
, and NJABL-PROXIES Are any of these tests duplicates, as in basically using the same data or basically the same test? Thanks for the help, Brian T. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MXRate-Allow

2006-11-18 Thread Brian Milburn
. Right now the current MXRate recommendation is No recommendation ;) Brian Andy Schmidt wrote: Is it me - or should MXRate-Allow be treated as a spam source list? I don't know how many times I've looked at Spam that made it through and the IP is on their whitelist, such as campaigner. Best

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Various Greeting Card messages

2007-07-12 Thread Brian Milburn
This one is a little faster: (http://\b(?:[0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}\b) David Barker wrote: I have seen these if this is what you referring to the second line is looking for an IP. You could try this in a filter: BODYEND NOTCONTAINS SEEING YOUR CARD BODY20 PCRE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Various Greeting Card messages

2007-07-12 Thread Brian Milburn
:// as well it should be fine. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 4:42 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Various Greeting Card messages This one is a little

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] multiple simultaneous problems

2008-02-29 Thread Brian Milburn
It might help to open task manager and reduce the service priority for the time being to give you a little more breathing room until you get the problem sorted out. Brian David Dodell wrote: -Original Message- From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which RBL's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blank TO Test?

2011-09-23 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi Rick, FYI, there is also a test in Alligate for this that may nail them earlier in the process. Brian On 9/23/2011 8:40 AM, Rick Davidson wrote: How would one go about triggering on a message with a blank or missing TO field? -- Rick CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail message

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-16 Thread Brian Baker
Looks like tonight we better figure out a new approach. My declude diag file is now reading declude lic as invalid. Anyone else? - Original Message - From: Todd Richards to...@nnepa.com To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 9:34 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.48 (beta) released

2002-04-23 Thread Brian R. Watters
Scott, Where can I read about the Attach Action? .. I do not see it in the sample cfg files or the online manual? .. Brian R. Watters Senior Director of Information Technologies Totlcom BroadBand Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wireless EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.totlcombroadband.com 559

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] consensus

2002-04-27 Thread Brian R. Watters
Could not agree more! Scott and Declude Make Ipswitch worth putting up with .. Well almost :) Brian R. Watters Senior Director of Information Technologies Totlcom BroadBand Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wireless EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.totlcombroadband.com 559-420-0205 559-291-1895 fax

[Declude.JunkMail] Bayesian filtering

2002-09-22 Thread Brian R. Watters
Hello all, Has anyone seen anything about this .. Any good or bad ? .. Bayesian filtering .. Check this link http://www.paulgraham.com/filters.html Scott are you thinking along any of these line for the future of Declude? Brian --- [Scanned for viruses with safE-Mail by American Broadband