Hello Darin,
Friday, April 8, 2005, 10:07:51 AM, you wrote:
DC Certainly true...but in the case of reasonable doubt grin, a good lawyer
DC could use that argument wellbut hopefully it won't come to that.
DC Darin.
Civil cases do not require 'beyond a reasonable doubt', only criminal.
--
Hello Don,
Friday, December 24, 2004, 6:01:43 AM, you wrote:
DS I cannot find where Smarter Mail supports ODBC? Our IMail set-up is with SQL
DS database for usernames and passwords integrated with our Cold Fusion
DS applications. Does anyone know if Smarter Mail will work with database?
DS
Hello DLAnalyzer,
Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 10:01:47 AM, you wrote:
DS Because of this issue I wrote a Windows service that not only monitors the
DS imail queue it also monitors the declude overflow directory. You can setup
DS different types of alerts (size and growth percentage) to notify
Hello Mark,
Monday, December 13, 2004, 10:04:38 AM, you wrote:
MES Has anyone experienced a problem when using Imail/Declude as a gateway
where
MES some random messages just seem to backup in the queue for no reason? We'll
MES go into Imail's queue manager, select them and hit send now and the
Hello Darin,
Tuesday, December 7, 2004, 10:12:56 AM, you wrote:
DC Here's an example test config:
DC REGEX14 external 0 c:\winnt\system32\cmd.exe /c findstr If you require
DC any of the medications below, 1 0
Try single quotes around the string. e.g.:
REGEX14 external 0
Hello Kyle,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 2:14:57 AM, you wrote:
KF I just applied the hot fix and we will seeif it works. I
KF wont know until about 8:30am CST when the emailload really
KF hits. Just to let you all know that I setup 3different DNS
KF servers with 2003 and they all had the
Hello Markus,
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 10:20:16 AM, you wrote:
MG 1.) Anyone has had the known Imail-NIC problems with this
Ethernet ports?
Yep.
MG And your solution? Installing another NIC card (3Com) beside the other four
MG existing ethernet ports?
Don't do that. Create 2 more
Hello Dan,
Thursday, October 28, 2004, 10:23:25 AM, you wrote:
DG Hello, All,
DG We are in the process of re-doing are web site and I am looking for a good,
DG current, reliable Anti-Virus breaking news feed that we can put on our web
DG site. We are currently a registed Symantec Partner and we
Hello Darin,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 10:22:11 AM, you wrote:
DC We're working on an independent version of SpamReview that has more
DC information and adjustments capabilities built in, but there are two
DC existing freeware products on the Declude Utilities page: SpamReview being a
DC desktop
MES Also, Exchange 2003 doesn't run POP3/IMAP4 by default and in our org so
MES that's why I can't use Outlook Express.
The Bat! is a MAPI client and it allows viewing of headers inline with
the message=. I do not have an Exchange server to test the MAPI
functionality, but you can download a
Something else not touched on by John, it is one file for three product
tracks (Junk Mail, Virus, and Hijack), any one of them can cause a new
interim, even as a minor bug fix.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Anybody have any experience with this company? A customer of mine has been
asked to use this service for one of his customers and he is trying to
figure out what they are really doing and if we can set up our own way of
doing the archiving.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
---
[This E-mail
For the record, it does not read the whole log unless you are not running it
regularly, it writes the last read position to a file and seeks to that
position on the next gather. If ran regularly using scheduler, it wasn't
that bad of a process hog on my old single proc system. I have not set it
To: Charles Frolick
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Notification to customers of change of
ownership
I have never seen a cheap addin for MS SMTP, even simple ones.
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail%40declude.com/msg17599.html
I suppose it depends on what you mean by add
Did you mean WEIGHT10 COPYFILE C:\Imail\spool\weight10\?
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
I don't use the MAILBOX action at all, I write a filterable header and
use Imail filters to sort mail. Means it will work even on forwarded
accounts to other servers or in clients with header filtering
capabilities. Also, since I classify spam rank, you can take different
actions based on rank,
I can see it as a viable option for grey items using weighting, but it
still doesn't answer the licensing problem.
You could also use the existing action of bounce (I know it has
changed), just let them know that the mail is rejected, or you can use
attach. There are options that already exist in
Does anyone know of an easy way to check an entire netblock for
listings? We are suppsed to be getting some additional IP's but I want
to make sure they are clean first.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
I seriously don't think they would bother with the code needed to detect
the difference between accepting everything in the dictionary and
bouncing some or all addresses. A spammer using dictionary attacks may
not be harvesting addresses, they may just be spamming a dictionary of
addresses. The
I just finished moving all of my servers to all new boxes on a new
backbone connection with my own ARIN designation. The problem I seem to
suffering from is, even though I have 1 hour TTL's some ISP's are taking
days to refresh the records for many of the servers and the hosted
domains. I moved
You're welcome to use/modify my stats grapher, it uses RRD to graph the
logs from Declude. I had to stop using it for resource reasons on my
old server, and just haven't had time to set it up on my new server. It
is at http://spamreview.argolink.net/software/declude.htm. It is in
perl.
Thanks,
The only thing you could do is find some way to split the messages into
one copy per recipient. Imail does not handle them this way, but some
MTA's do. You could set up your MX server(s) to be a gateway box that
uses an MTA that splits the message to per recipient (note: this still
won't help
It appears the Sobig.F remailer capabilities are being used. I have
received 4 complaints in the last 2 days about spamming from my dial
pool with headers like these:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: x
Received: (qmail 14974 invoked by uid 88); 24 Sep 2003 03:39:33 -
Received:
You might want to add underscores, I use underscores as my seperator,
and I doubt I am the only ISP to do so. Also, why did you start the list
at 30? I know that it I very unlikely for a residential IP to be all
numbers under 30, but why 30? And finally, what about those that pad
with zero's?
Why do they have to have a real mail box? I send mail as aliases all
the time, my support, sales, postmaster, hostmaster, webmaster, staff,
etc., addresses are all aliases but I have no problem sending as them,
as long as the client is configured correctly.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
I like Xmail server (http://www.xmailserver.org), it is multi platform
and can easily do what you want.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Patnode
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL
: 363051832
Status: U
Ignore the BADHEADERS, I hand typed the message source.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2
I have customers here in the building that host domains with us that
come visit me when there is a fifteen minute delay in their email since
there are deals with tens of thousands of dollars relying on the speed
of email, too late and someone else has the deal. Unless you know about
their
We changed our handling because of this. We classify and rank using
weights, then add a formatted header, they then can use Imail rules or
client rules to handle as they wish. I also built a web app that will
modify their rules for them by providing a simple how aggressive do you
want to be and
If you don't mind running a MX gateway or switching to a different one,
Xmail server (www.xmailserver.org) does split all messages into
individual recipients, I tested it. Downside is you will run declude
for every recipient which will increase server load. I would guess at
least a 5-10%
I believe the Outlook XP and 2003 mail config test uses the subject
encoding as well on the test message. Had acustomer with bad pop
settings leave several test on webmail and they looked like that.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to remember if this has been suggested before, couldn't seem
to find anything in the archives (probably bad search terms). How about
a test similar to MAILFROM but it checks the intended recipients of all
local domains and fails if any of them are invailid, ignoring the nobody
alias.
I just finished getting all the latest updates, service packs and
patches on my servers last week (spent a couple days double checking and
catching what auto update doesn't show). I believe they all had that
patch already, but could have been bad.
I have been considering putting filters on all
This probably won't be your only reply, but, the netblock is
69.60.0.0/24 (256 addresses), they only have a standard Class C
allocation. I have 9 of them, if you can prove to your upstream provider
the need, the good ones will give them to you, or many others will let
you pay a one time setup for
Scott,
I have a customer who hosts their web and DNS with me and their mail on
SWBell DSL. SWBell would not create a custom PTR but will delegate the
reverse zone of their IP's to my name server (which is cool). The
problem is I do not think they did it correctly or my NS handles it in
an odd
I typoed, it is 65.69.201.192/27, and my zone is
192/27.201.69.65.in-addr.arpa.
And lookup of http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=65.69.201.192
shows:
Asking d.root-servers.net for 192.201.69.65.in-addr.arpa PTR record:
d.root-servers.net says to go to FIGWORT.arin.net. (zone:
Thanks,
For some reason I wasn't catching that they were referring to a zone
named 192.201.69.65.in-addr.arpa instead of
192/27.201.69.65.in-addr.arpa as I had it. All works now. I guess I was
expecting my server to need the CIDR notation to know that it needs to
find the delegating server for
I find it funny that EV1 is a major spam source for you, they are my
lagrest competitor here in Houston (they are Houston based). I know
they use Imail and Declude (they really should monitor these lists,
maybe even try providing some input), and with a reported 300k users,
they should be very
I just had to share the following. Look at the name given for the
sender.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Annoying!! [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PopUps - BeGone!!
**Subscriber details for
When I wrote the stats grapher app, I ran across the same problem at all
log levels (I generally run MID). When I mentioned it on the list, some
otheres who wrote log analyzers had noticed the same thing. I'm sure it
has to do with the volume of mail received, since more mail means more
declude
I love email, I received your reply about an hour and a half before I
received my post, and the headers show the delay was in delivery to my
mail server from declude.com, yet I received 4 other posts between.
Don't worry about finding what happened, I'm sure it is temporary errors
(my server busy)
Scott,
I had someone point out that two addresses in my range (209.144.1.100,
209.144.1.14) are listed in ORDB, I went to DNSStuff.com and the lookup
tool said they were not, bud a direct query of ORDB shows them. I know
the l;istings are old, from 2001, and neither IP is in use for mail, so
I
I thought Win2003 was supposed to have added console access to Terminal
Services (I have some recollection that you are running 2003, could be
wrong though)? If you are not running 2003, just install VNC for the
occasions you need console access. That's what I had to do.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
I don't know what they did, and it is running as a service, but,
SimpleDNS Plus by jhsoftware.com had a similar issue with the need for
console access, however they found a way around it in their beta version
(not publicly released thought). I may have to poke at it a bit to see
if I can figure it
You don't have to leave it logged on, you can log in and out remotely
with VNC, you can even lock out the local inputs while in remote mode.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent:
Would you mind sharing your two lists? I would like to be more
aggressive with SPAMDOMAINS, but I know the FP potential.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003
They are all applied. The trick is, so far there are very few, and only
recently used, negative if pass tests. It might not be hard for Declude
to add a %TESTPASSED% variable, but if you use a lot of tests, this will
be a very long list, especially for good email. It has been suggested
for them
Speaking of logging, would it be possible to add using a syslog daemon
as an option, I don't know off hand if it will save any processing
power, but it seems like it might since you will no longer have to
manage log file resources (locking, checking creation, destination
folder). It would
I built a simple VBScript for alerting if mail gets held in the Hijack
hold folders, it wouldn't take much to make it alert if number of Q
files in Overflow exceeds a threshhold or if any files exist at all. It
is available at http://spamreview.argolink.net/software, called the
Hijack Held
If you read the article they link to, it is a combination of challenge
response and virtual addresses, complete with the problems of not one,
but both anti-spam systems. They did do some interesting things, but
still seems like more work to deal with than most users will tolerate
over the long
I use weightrange to define 6 distinct levels of spam (the last one
actually is just weight so anything over is caught). Then all I do is
add a header X-SPAM-Level: TESTNAME. End result is what you are asking
for, just use stars instead of TESTNAME.
Global.cfg
SPAM-NONE weightrange
Scott,
Have you thought about using Declude Console as a short term dns cache
for Declude? I think the results Kami is seeing is because Ipswitch
included a DNS cache in the new Queue Manager, and their ip4r test may
be using it instead of the DNS. Declude could definitely benefit from
it since
Here is an interesting article on spam from the legitimate marketer's
perspective.
http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2003/03/31/story4.html
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
My only thought is, by some weird chance a spammer is using a real
return adress (I know that is truly funny), they would be able
troubleshoot the fails by sending to an invalid email address or a known
full mailbox and simply read the headers in the standard bounce message.
But I think this is a
The online docs and the mailing list archives tends to be a very good
reference, however since the program is so flexible, even Scott doesn't
know it's full potential. There are often threads where people have
managed to come up with some new and unforseen way of using Declude.
Now, that being
This should not be an issue since Habeas headers implies they are
adhereing to the strict rules put forth by Habeas, and had to pay for
the right to use them, if they are in violation, report them to Habeas,
who will take legal action against topica.com for violating the
agreement.
Thanks,
Chuck
Sounds like this test might be a good negative weight test like
IPNOTINMX. Of course if they use a good mailfrom it could reduce the
positive. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott
I looked through those since I use Savvis as well and have been very
pleased. It looks like most where DNS servers serving spamvertised
domains, the first one was used to relay mail through a router in what
sounds like a bad router design, but is a webmail company who may not
have secured their
Has anyone else been seeing messages where the body is in the headers? I
have a n example below. Just started happening, and since declude
appends to the end, the body shows blank in Outlook.
Bad MSG
Received: from 202.88.150.30 [202.88.150.30] by argolink.net
(SMTPD32-6.06) id
Hey scott, ever thought about adding a special action keyword like
FORCE, to force an action in the odd situation where you want to
override the the severity scale? It would only need to be handled in the
.junkmail files.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From:
I agree as an ISP that SPAMCOP alone does not work, but as a corporate
email, it might be considerably different, positive or negative.
Another test you might consider is SpamChk, I just started using it and
it makes a huge difference in my mail box, I do need to tune it though,
it trapps my Daily
I see you updated it recently, I was killing myself yesterday to
remember the name of Spammanager, had to search the archives. Also,
could you include a link to my add-ons site
http://spamreview.argolink.net/software, I have several tools there, one
is the zipfile for the Hijack notifier. As I
Thank you, it is a nice way to see how the filters are doing, and it
keeps the data set small, all 28 of my tests take up less than a meg to
store (rrd's are created at their final size).
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Delog is good, there is a thread about a beta log analyzer Log Analyzer
- Comments Needed, sounds real promising. You might check those out. I
seem to remember there being others, but can't think of them off hand.
The only other one is Netcomm LogTool, but I don't think you want to
spend $200
Scott,
Since IPNOTINMX only has use when it passes, there is no way to add a
header using WARN, and it doesn't show up in %FAILEDTESTS% (obviously),
so the problem is, it adjusts the weight but unless you go to the log
file, you don't know for shure it did. Is there a way to make it show
up in
with no reverse DNS entry.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.109.193.64]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com)
for spam.
X-Spam-Weight: 20
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BADHEADERS, HELOBOGUS, IPNOTINMX, REVDNS, WEIGHT05,
WEIGHT10, WEIGHT15, WEIGHT20
Dave
Charles
It's not Declude and Imail that's the problem, it's the extreme number
of postmaster messages balling up in your spool that will never be
delivered. At least that has been my experience, I'm in the same boat
(small isp ~6,000 accounts but 60k - 80k messages per day). I wrote a
utility to help
Ok, I do not see F-prot on the F-secure site at all, and F-secure
antivirus is $80 for personal edition, $424 for the server edition, and
I so not see mention of 20 user license.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.
]] On Behalf Of
Charles Frolick
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot
Ok, I do not see F-prot on the F-secure site at all, and
F-secure antivirus is $80 for personal edition, $424 for the
server edition, and I so not see
He could also use
WEIGHT02 weightmatch x x 2 0
Since weightmatch matches exactly that weight. I will recommend using
little bit bigger catch boxes though.
I think you will get a very good picture by having ranges set up along
these lines:
WEIGHT00-04 weightrange x x 0
I have made available a new util for all to use. It produces MRTG like
graphs of failed Junkmail tests as well as the message count. I have
also created a web page for all of my utils to be downloaded.
http://spamreview.argolink.net/software/.
If you want to see the graphs it can make go to
I forgot to mention that the stats grapher works from log level LOW on
up, although I did not test DEBUG, I do not forsee an issue.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Friday
Has anyone else noticed bad log lines in the JM log? I will get a short
spurt of partial log entries, usually without a newline to separate
them, occasionally just the end of an entry on a line by itself. Never
seems to last more than a minute. It can really mess with log analysis.
Thanks,
Chuck
Scott,
How about a small executable that talks to console the same way
Declude.exe does to send a release signal?
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:03
One problem with held or bounced mail that notifies the intended
recipient that it was blocked, is, you did not elimiate the spam, only
change it's contents to hundreds of notifications of unwanted mail.
This will get very old, very fast, and lead to the blacklists you are
trying to avoid.
]] On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Charles Frolick
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain?
Reply to: Charles Frolick
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain? on Friday
9:35:39 AM
We already capture most spam and virus using
This is not an uncommon problem. From what I know, Imail 7.x still has
it. In my research, I have not found a tool to clear just one folder in
a mailbox based on date, but I did develop an application to manage spam
using a combination of weighting, Imail rules, and an external server
software
Scott,
If an external test was the last one defined would the following work?
MYTEST external nonzero c:\mytest.exe %TESTSFAILED% 0 0
The reason is, I'm thinking about creating an app to plot the hit rate
for my tests, but I want to make it a data gatherer rather than a log
analyzer (spreads out
I have an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED] that points to several
addresses. For some reason the first address never recieves the email,
there are no imail rules set up either globally or for the address and
the ldeliver line says it is delivered to NUL. The only other odd thing
is for some reason in
Scott,
Would it be possible to get a little more info on what is logged at the
different levels, ERROR, WARNING, and DEBUG are pretty self explanatory,
and probably rarely used, but I'm unclear on the differences between
LOW, MID, and HIGH.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
---
[This E-mail
I was really looking for even a basic list of additional lines, but
that's ok, I'll just capture logs at the different levels and figure it
out the old fashioned way.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.
Scott,
Is the REDIRECT statement processes per domain as well or only on the
global $default$.junkmail file? I have redirects for several addresses
in our primary domain, but I need to have a different set of actions for
all of our hosting accounts, so I have per domain set up for our primary
If you get the right software Win32 DNS doesn't need a lot of machine
either. I run win2k on a dual p150 and a ppro200. Both machines only
have 128MB RAM, I run Simple DNS Plus by jhsoft.com, no problems, that's
with running a small ISP and hosting over 200 domains in DNS. Plus the
software is
Great a patch for a very old issue is going to cost me $600 to get a new
service agreement for other upgrades I didin't want. (Still running
6.06, patch is for 7.13, funny how ver.7 has had 13 revisions and no
where near ver.8, ver.6 only needed 6)
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original
This is a very naive approach. If it deals with billing, it will need
lots of legislation, tax law consideration, it will cause the owner of
the phone number or email to deal with taxes for the collected income.
Not to mention the crack pots that will say it is $10,000 to place an
unwanted call
Does anyone know if any of the Imail log analyzers reports number of
good and bad deliveries by remote servers? I want to look at
blacklisting remote addresses that send high percentage of messages to
invalid addresses. These are most likely from mailing lists and
therefore likely spam. I keep
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklisting based on % of bad addresses
Does anyone know if any of the Imail log analyzers reports number of
good and bad deliveries by remote servers? I want
I just posted asp source to my app which is similar in concept to Tom's,
except it also has a spambox to manage held spam for the user. I know
some people have looked at it, but I haven't received any feedback yet.
It aollows for management of the spam messages separate from Imail's
aging since
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Web App Released
I have posted a copy of my SpamReview web app for download. It is
sourceware, modify to your needs. I will provide as much support
I am working on an interface to control Imail rules to hold or delete mail
based on rankings from weight tests in declude. I have 6 seperate ranks of
spam from NONE (which as always can include misses) to VHIGH. It's not very
pretty right now, but it is fuctional. I plan on adding fuctionality,
I have an updated, almost ready for beta, version up now. Please have a look
and let me know what you think.
My next update message should be to notify of a downloadable beta (full
source), then hopefully a workable freeware release.
Again, the info.
http://spamreview.argolink.net
user: [EMAIL
Ok, I just uploaded a new revision to my Spambox App.
The URL is http://spamreview.argolink.net
email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pass is demo
Info at http://spamreview.argolink.net/doc
It now has full capability to manage settings per user. A few more issues to
resolve and I will look at packaging it
I'd stay with their current, and you'll either have to build your own filter
for Declude logs or ask them to build it for you, they will for registered
users without a charge, and if it is a common log format add it to their
permanent list. The different levels of info used in the various Declude
I use Sawmill fro my customers web stats, and for custom stats for internal
use, it is an excellent product.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Dan Cummings
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM
Ok, Sounds like everyone is building a tool of some sort, might no hurt to
get some collaboration going. I recently posted a link to a spam reviewing
ASP app, and I am working on a way to modify the users rules files to filter
based on a standard declude config. If any ASP developers want a look
The owner of my company also has another company in the office, and they all
send out as the group alias and CC the group alias so everyone has a
complete copy of communications with customers. No one can say I didn't
know what he said to the customer.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original
I am working on a web based held message review app that allows customers to
redeliver false positives or delete the spam on their own. I have a test
mailbox set up and a basic info page.
The app is at http://spmareview.argolink.net, the test box is
[EMAIL PROTECTED], pass is demo.
The info page
I wrote a very simple batch file that runs nightly and holds mail for up to
10 days, alternately you could use a program called xxcopy that can delete,
copy, or move files based on age. I included the batch file, zipped up.
Nothing special, no extra programs needed.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
Have you tried making both of them a group alias, and point them to the same
text file? This will make it so you only have to edit the one file and both
aliases point to the same mail boxes. It also makes it scriptable for edits,
it you really need to go that far.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
As far as the clearing the spambox goes, IMail includes a program that can
clear old mail, unfortunately it clears all mailboxes found in a directory
recursively. I have looked into writing a utility to do the same but be
direct able at individual .mbx files, but the problem comes from the two
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
