can sit back and relax, because I feel the report is a good
compromise,
made by many people.
As a note to the PMC, I will drop the , unless the PMC ask me to
include
something.
Let us stop bashing each other, and get some work done !!!
rgds
jan I.
On 5 April 2015 at 12:35, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 11:49:44AM +0200, jan i wrote:
> >...
> > I have never thought or said this was about my person, it has nothing to
> do
> > with my person.
> > It has to do with the free will of a community ver
On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 02:37:46AM +0200, jan i wrote:
> >...
> > Background is that after the report was submitted, a ASF Member (not
> board
> > member and not part of our community)
> > felt that I as new AOO chair,
On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> > On 5 Apr 2015, at 7:20 am, jan i > wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon > wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
> >>
> >>> felt that I as new AOO chair
to do a
wake-up call, instead of continuing the "no news is good news" we have been
using for quite a while.
Rgds
jan i.
On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon wrote:
> On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
>
> > felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative and
> against the wishes of the community
>
> I'm going to suggest that said PMC Member was simply shocked at t
e a timing challenge, and need to act fast before the reporting
window closes, alternatively I can
replace the report with a short note stating the I (as chair) have removed
it, because the community need more
time to discuss the content.
rgds
jan I.
On 4 April 2015 at 11:48, Andrea Pescetti wr
Just got confirmation from infra, they have had a server problem today,
that has affected a large number of vms.
We might still see shorter periods with prolonged responses, while infra
get all systems normalized.
rgds
jan I.
On 2 April 2015 at 18:18, wrote:
>
> After hours of pr
cached. I saw it because I on purpose cleared my
cache searching for another problem.
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:03:04AM +0100, jan i wrote:
> > To be fair, even has pretty much given up on AOO and buildbots, we can
> get
> > VMs if we want to and manage them ourself.
>
> That sound interest
On 1 April 2015 at 17:08, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 05:08:08PM +0100, jan i wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > when I look at http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
> > I cannot see the Mac buildbots we got last year, can someone tell me what
> &
On 1 April 2015 at 09:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 30/03/2015 jan i wrote:
>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+Mar
>> You might notice that I prefer to use a much more direct tone, than Andrea
>> did.
>>
>
> Looks very good,
whenever possible which is a big part of "the apache way".
Looking forward to see you more on the ASF Community mailing lists.
Keep up the good work !
welcome
jan i.
On 31 March 2015 at 00:15, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 03/30/2015 02:52 PM, Marcus wrote:
> > Am 03/30/2015 11:41 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
> >>
> >> On 03/30/2015 09:36 AM, jan i wrote:
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> Time for my fir
On 30 March 2015 at 19:16, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/30/2015 06:36 PM, schrieb jan i:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning.
>>
>
> thanks for the report draft. Here are some remarks:
>
> 1.
> - CMS discussion, ... The Board s
Actually a lot of the top level pages have not been touched since 2011. I
recomend we move (not delete) all top level pages below a new page
"archive", so we can see in the menu system what is actually in use.
thouughts ?
rgds
jan I
to the agenda April 5 (end of
this week). Clearly if we have discussions that needs to be settled before
committing the final report.
The report is in Wiki, so all with access can change it, please change
typos etc directly, but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning.
Rgds
jan I
+1
rgds
jan i
On 30 March 2015 at 12:25, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I propose submitting the latest NetBeans plugin [1] to NetBeans.org for
> inclusion in their plugins downloads.
>
> Afterward I will update the wiki with the new location.
>
> I believe the plu
Hi.
It seems we have had a problem with forum.openoffice.org. It seems that due
to an update of the proxy server (SSL Terminator), new users, and people
who have cleared the browser cache, would not be able to get access.
I mailed infra earlier today, and it is now corrected.
rgds
jan I.
ight, but. not having a release manager is a major problem. Sone
of us might help decide what goes into the release, starting with nothing
but digital signing and onward, depending on the capacity available.
rgds
jan i
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
t, but. not having a release manager is a major problem. Sone
of us might help decide what goes into the release, starting with nothing
but digital signing and onward, depending on the capacity available.
rgds
jan i
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
currently at the level of
finding a release manager (this release is important for infra, due to the
$ amount they used to buy digital signing tickets for us, which are soon
due to run out).
rgds
jan i
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
On Friday, March 27, 2015, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/26/2015 08:09 AM, schrieb jan i:
>
>> In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ, which is
>> worth reading.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> If the CMS were to be decommissioned in the way current
ou would not need Ubuntu.
>
I had 4.0 running under Debian, and used the Ubuntu instructions, I do
remember there was 1 package I had to download by expending the package
catalog.
Debian is basically a more raw distribution than Ubuntu. Bear in min I am
not judging here, every distribution has it
ent online edtitor for our translators (who are also
committers)
- Find a way to keep the templates active in pure HTML
- Decide not to use markdown but only html (BAD for our translators).
Or alternatively (something that currently seems less work):
- Get a VM, install CMS and run it for us.
rgds
jan I.
lar
> since it's the last version without systemd.
>
+1
>
> This would put up less pressure on infra for the buildbot and let us use
> by default a newer toolchain.
>
To be fair, even has pretty much given up on AOO and buildbots, we can get
VMs if we want to and manage th
well?
Yes you can find a drectory named unittests, that contain a automated test
framework as wellas many test cases. This is however a bit old and could do
with a makeover.
rgds
jan i
>
> Kind Regards,
> Buddhi Eashwarage
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:52 AM, jan i >
>
as well.Is that correct.
Yes the core is C++, but a lot of especially the API parts are Java. When
you dig you also find a little bit Pyhon.
rgds
jan I
>
> I can use a linux distribution such as Ubuntu.At the moment i haven't
> installed a one.So i think linux environment will make th
mine which fixes goes into 4.1.2
- Make the release
- Get it tested
- and finally get it voted on.
Not much a student can help with here (GSocC is mainly programming).
rgds
jan i.
> Last year there was a CMIS project for AOO, I am not sure if it was
> finished
> succesfully but would be good to hear the stories on what followed up and
> some
> lessons learned.
ver changes the mail archives, simply because it does not
help anything. In this case the user is not even complaining about our nail
archive (which are private). "we" in this would be infra, and they follow
policy.
rgds
jan i
> On Mar 14, 2015 5:41 PM, "Grampa Renato,
ddress,
it is practically impossible to remove a mail once it has being multiplied.
Rgds
jan i
>
>
> Thanks
>
> RG
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> *Sent:* 14 March 2015 17:38
> *To:* dev; Grampa Renato, GB
> *Subject:* Summary
>
&g
l personal subscribers (which apache do
not control) and ask all these entities to remove your mail.
Rgds
jan I.
" and
nothing else has happened here. The mailing archive you refer to are
subscribed to the list, and therefore an "intended recipent".
Rgds
jan I.
Ps. info to dev@ I do not copy dev@ on the following mails but only forward
directly to Renato.
-- Forwarded message ----
On 12 March 2015 at 17:27, FR web forum wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117896
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119006
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=24317
>
Andrea just sent an email to infra, I suspect it is the same theme.
f OpenOffice, or simply
> want to know more friends in the community, please reply and let us know
> so we can arrange the venue. ^_^
>
HI Imacat
A good imitative, I will not be present, but I wish you all the best in
arranging the BoF, and hope you all will have some productive hours
toge
archive owner, you mail was, in full
accordance with normal mailing list policy, sent to all subscribers.
Rgds
jan i.
>
> I await your confirmation before the above deadline.
>
> regards
> Renato Grampa
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
a and media. I think that
> it could bring locally more visibility to the AOO project than if I try to
> push the wagon alone.
>
Collaboration is the key to opensource, so any collaboration that brings
positive effects to AOO is welcome.
rgds
jan i.
>
> I don't have contacted them up to now, I'm waiting for your advice before
> to do it.
>
> Regards
> --
> gw
>
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> On 11.03.2015 10:53, jan i wrote:
> > On 11 March 2015 at 10:33, Guy Waterval > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> As it seems that I will be retired in advance (4 years) in July, I will
> >>
Hi
On Monday, March 9, 2015, Harvey Sama wrote:
> Hello. I am a fourth year student of the Faculty of Engineering at the
> University of Buea. I have experience in Java,Javafx and Java EE with
> PrimeFaces framework. I am motivated to work on this project and with over
> 2 years of java experien
On Monday, March 9, 2015, Louis Suárez-Potts > wrote:
>
> > On 08-03-2015, at 15:14, jan i wrote:
> >
> > For those who do not follow some of the foundation mailing lists.
>
>
> Jan, what mail lists would you recommend interested members follow?
Members w
.
Please also remark, that the forum and wiki in not included, and those have
quite heavy traffic.
rgds
jan i.
Mailing lists *↑* Back to top
<https://reporter.apache.org/?openoffice#tab_openoffice>
- us...@openoffice.apache.org:Currently: 570 subscribers (down -13 in
the
nterpreted, I'll be happy to move over and remind that I welcome any
> constructive offer for help in any fields.
I agree with Andrea, helping is worth more than just writing words, and I
think it is better to try and read mails with a positive filter. Non-native
speakers will from tim
s said before, we talk about the code not the website. Due to
CMS we cannot currently move the web site so that will remain untouched in
SVN.
currently (as far as I can see) the web site is not part of the RO GIT
mirror.
rgds
jan i
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 6:59 P
not homogenous and we deal with many levels of participation and direction,
> much simply on account of the magnitude of the software, the sites, the
> intended users, and the history. We could be not so driven although I
> expect that would not resonate on dev@, user@, or the forums.
I did not tal
Just realized, that many might jump over the old subject.
This issue is an important issue and should not be hidden behind another
subject.
rgds
jan i.
On 7 March 2015 at 10:03, jan i wrote:
>
>
> On 7 March 2015 at 01:55, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 a
es time.
I for one will do, as I did in the beginning of this thread (and got quite
flamed for it) disclose my own opinion and as much as I can from private@
without breaking the rules.
I believe it is high time to discuss this issue openly...and hopefully not
only contributors but also comitters will raise their voice.
rgds
jan I.
S.
>
On 6 March 2015 at 18:09, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> -- replying below to --
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 06:03
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: PMC FAQ update
>
> On 6 March 2015 at 14:36, Dave Barton wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
> > OK
On 6 March 2015 at 14:36, Dave Barton wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 05/03/15 15:04, Louis Su�rez-Potts wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 05-03-2015, at 06:49, Simon Phipps wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:03 AM, jan i wrote:
>
projects, and wants to see both projects evolve.
rgds
jan I.
ps. Using Qt in corinthia is not a problem, since it only affects a little
part of the total code base, so no need to discuss that in here.
-- Forwarded message --
From: jan i
Date: 6 March 2015 at 11:33
Subject: dfedit
ct mailing list page.
It seems harder to change
> [2] Add a new cwiki page under Directory of Volunteers listing mailing
> list moderators (easier to change but that could be a problem)
I favor this, we add the different mailing lists, with owner@ and ask
moderators to add themself, just
On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Dave Barton wrote:
> jan i wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Dave Barton >
> wrote:
> >
> >> jan i wrote:
> >>> On 5 March 2015 at 11:42, Simon Phipps >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Dave Barton wrote:
> jan i wrote:
> > On 5 March 2015 at 11:42, Simon Phipps >
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Dave Barton > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 23
ussion happened (partly wrongly) on private@
Basically some of us (including myself) does not want to have our names
published where it is not really needed or beneficial.
Since we have and owner@ to every list, there are no need to publish the
individual names.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Thanks,
>
> S.
>
> [1]: http://markmail.org/thread/l4yjh7gcgk5k6ist
>
kins
> and production website checkins.
>
> The question is now, what do we want to do with it:
>
> - Deleting as it is not used and not needed
+1
rgds
jan i
> - Changing some commit messages to arrive there instead of
ions of the
> FSF and SFLC can be justified by the same reasons (the audience in that
> case is radically different) so I have nothing against rewriting this part
> avoiding to name specific entities and licenses (other than the ASF and
> Apache License, of course).
+1 let us get this behin
ar this could be the start of a
problem, especially if this is seen as physical servers.
rgds
jan i.
Thanks,
> --
> Jeffrey Borcean
> Student Systems Engineer
> OSU Open Source Lab
> jeff...@osuosl.org
>
>
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Is there a reason why this mail is sent to both dev@ and private@ ?
Mixing private and public mail lists is not really a good thing.
rgds
jan i
On Monday, February 23, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
> I just updated the PMC FAQ page on the project website.
>
> Please let us know if there ar
On Monday, February 23, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
> I just updated the PMC FAQ page on the project website.
>
> Please let us know if there are further changes to the persons listed as
> e-mail moderators, wiki admins, or anything else.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> -
> * The frequency of internal audits;
> * The intensity of internal audits;
>
That could also work, because it does not mention the other licenses.
rgds
jan i.
>
> jonathon
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU6pNbAAoJEKG7hs8n
t; https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOODEV/Infrastructure ) dies,
> so it has no admins any longer.
please ask infra to remove it, we do not want to have dead space hanging.
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> --
> Andrea.
>
> Well we need to do a better job with this. Despite its lack of
> maintenance, this page is better than not having anything at all!
>
+1
Sadly enough Infra does not have this information, so I cannot pull it out
is request and grant the rights.
>
Thanks for this information, that is new to me, but I do not doubt it.
I change my +1 to depend on Keith has experience with Confluence, and Infra
accept the request.
rgds
jan I.
>
> While I don't have the bandwidth to respond to account requests, I
On 20 February 2015 at 13:16, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:48 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 20 February 2015 at 01:46, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> &g
l it should work or be removed (which I do not
recommend).
rgds
jan i.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> > Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> >> On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote:
> >>> OK, next try. Still an e
of the SQL), develop your theme,
once you have it, make a couple of screenshot and get acceptance in here.
Once it is accepted I am happy to take it, verify it, and install it on the
production system.
Sounds like a plan to you ?
rgds
jan i.
>
> Please comment.
>
> --
> Alexan
to create MWiki accounts, but not to create
> CWiki accounts. I propose that we give Keith the CWiki admin privileges
> too, so that we are more efficient in handling new account requests. I'll
> assume lazy consensus on this.
>
+1
rgd
my page saying unsupported.
just my 2ct.
rgds
jan i
>
> Then:
>
> 1) I also get (Firefox) the warning about "This website does not supply
> identity information"; I didn't investigate this one.
>
> 2) We still load components from HTTP. Marcus, the Net panel in
o VOTE
+1 for deleting the page.
but please sleep on it, cancel the vote tomorrow, and make a wording
together with Andrea that the PMC (this includes Jim and yourself) are
happy with.
rgds
jan i
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Williams [mailto:william...@
p to you to either call a vote or work
with us all to find a solution.
Please suggest a compromise, that satisfies people like jim (in short keep
ASF happy) and is something you can accept. i am easy, if ASF is happy I am
happy.
tgds
jan i
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> Am 02/19
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> jan i wrote:
> > On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i >
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis
On 19 February 2015 at 18:22, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i wrote:
> > On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps
> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at
v2? And
> how can we best express these benefits to potential users?
>
> Changing the content, does not change the fact about whose opinion it is !
I have already made one proposal as to how a disclaimer placed at top could
look like.
"This page do not reflect the opinion of ASF or
On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which
> > seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people.
> >
> > There a
auses this kind of
discussions, and would prefer to see it removedhowever a statement on
top of the page saying something like:
"This page do not reflect the opinion of ASF or the AOO PMC"
would at least stop the negative discussions.
Thoughts?
rgds
jan I.
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >"The connection to this we
re or less all
attachments get stripped off.
however I checked on the vm, the certificate is active.
2 good possibilities:
- firefox dns caching does not resolve to our machine
-- solution clear the firefox history and try again.
- Firefox has the old certificate stored and for some reason did not
t start from a fresh but build on history.
Not much will change, just because I am chair instead of you.except you
do not need to secure the board reports are made :-)
Have a nice evening.
rgds
jan I.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> -
late sets can be very important in certain areas
> of application.
>
> We still have the original resource problem to solve, yet it is nice to
> see thoughtful definition taking place.
Do we (AOO) have to solve that, or is it the project (being downstream to
AOO) ?
To me it sounds like a d
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 17/02/2015 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, jan i wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>>
>>>> on a sidenote, I wo
the infra repo, where all vm/appl is stored.
rgds
jan i
>
> I want to introduce a small patch on the mwiki categories which have a UL
> with list-style: none;
>
> Regards.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Alexandro Colorado > wrote:
>
> > Is more than code, t
pretty old and might not be useful with the current versions
> of PyUNO.
Would it not be better to put it in svn?
rgds
jan i
>
> Links are here:
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Python
>
> Primarily on PyUNO Modules.
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Co
ing" area
> with some specific topics that could be given more detail in child pages.
>
> if there are no objections, I'll put this in place this by Friday pm of
> this week.
+1
rgds
jan i
>
> --
> ---
HI.
Remark those that follow bugzilla-admin, will have noticed that Infra has
identified a problem with BZ sending mail.
I assume it will be solved quickly.
rgds
jan I.
On 16 February 2015 at 20:56, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Do you mean that you do not receive a direct copy of
need to know
- is the brand registred and eho has the current right to the brand
- can we as AOO provide resources to keep this alive
I think it is a good downstream project, but I do not currently see a
possibility to add this to the AOO project.
rgds
jan i
>
> But this may not be importa
://git.apache.org/incubator-corinthia.git)
This is true for any GIT repo, and not only ASF.
rgds
jan I.
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:41
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.o
On 13 February 2015 at 18:13, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
> >
> > Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers t
o.
>
> Can you please explain what doesn’t work already? Although I use the AOO
> SVN, I don’t think I miss any commits made via Git. How am I mistaken?
may I please suggest you read the links I gave.
>
> Is this rather a concern for infrastructure server demand and performance?
no
but I wonder what kind of disruption
> cost there is for current work.
>
Well it is not only do-able, at the moment about half of all ASF projects
work that way. The disruption cost is an infra ticket, and about 3-4 hours
downtime.
We have today more git commits than svn commits.
rgds
jan i.
&g
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
Moving to a full git repo (see http://git.apache.org/), would mean giving
up our current SVN repo, but history etc. will be available in Git instead.
The choice is there, and it is just a matter of how people want to work.
thoughts ?
rgds
jan I.
>
> Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an
> Apache project?
> If so, have they since been abandoned?
>
I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess
is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
rgds
ja
gs to translate, it
there are no active team the UI will not be 100%, so it will not be
released.
Therefore I see the 2 requirements go hand in hand.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
>
+1 from me.
rgds
jan i.
On 12 February 2015 at 15:31, Logan Minnix wrote:
> I have a team of people that would like to add the enhancement that this
> issue <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=45593> asks for. Is
> that okay with you guys?
>
> Our plan is to
It never does, because you do not your project jira but gsoc and that is
jira
rgds
jan i
>
> -- Dennis E. Hamilton
> orc...@apache.org
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org +1-206-779-9430
> https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A
> X.509 c
?
We also have a label in BZ for "easy bugs" which you might want to look at.
Feel free to ask on this list.
rgds
jan i
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015, Logan Minnix wrote:
> To whomever it may concern,
>
> My name's Logan. I'm part of a team of five people that want t
..so let us all start pulling and hopefully in the same direction.
I for one, will start discussions about what we need to change to seriously
attract people, and give our code a facelift...I do have some indications
from elsewhere that are equally exciting and innovative, more about this
later.
jan
nse to inite Dennis.
You are right in ASF we alwayes try to make consensus, but I am not sure
what can bevdone in this case. If there is a general feeling that this vote
needs somehow to be redone, I am not the one standing in the way.
Furthermore I am NOT elected by the vite, but Andrea sends a
filled with preparations for ApacheCON US (Austin
in april). AOO is sadly not very well represented. I had hoped that the US
part of our community would give some interesting presentations, but not
all hopes come through.
Have fun !!
rgds
jan I.
a "dream"
role for me, To be quite clear I would much more have liked a situation
where some of the PMC members had accepted a nomination.
Enough said.
rgds
jan i
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
(I have not changed since I resigned).
I hope our community get a working PMC with a lot more activity.
rgds
jan i
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Sorry wrong ML.
Happened just because I read Kay´s comment on the chair election, to which
I can only say, had there been more discussion we would be voting between 2
candidates now...but who knows what happens in the future.
rgds
jan i.
On 18 January 2015 at 20:27, jan i wrote:
>
101 - 200 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
