[dev] OT: What is the current modus of OOo and what is its outlook ?

2011-05-03 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, just very curious, short of clear statements on the OOo homepage (looking in the News area): what is the current modus vivendi for OpenOffice.org? Who is developing/releasing it, will it be developed further? Is there a concrete Oracle plan clarifying the future

[dev] How to find out whether the installed OOo is 32- or 64-bit

2011-04-09 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, for an installation routine it is necessary to determine whether the installed version of OOo is 32- or 64-bit, as this determines which libraries and configuration should be installed. Is there a way to find that out (currently on Linux, but once MacOSX and/or Windows gain 64-bit

[dev] MacOSX+OOo3.3: loading a library via Java' System.loadLibrary(...)

2011-04-08 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, currently debugging a scripting language added to OOo 3.3 via an oxt-extension. The integration into OOo is done using the OOo beanshell programs, but adapted to the scripting language. The scripting language is ooRexx and there is a library that needs to be loaded via Java (using

[dev] MacOSX+OOo3.3+Java: howto setup ?

2011-02-15 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, trying to figure out the setup needs for OOo 3.3 on MacOSX, if wishing to use Java from the commandline to bootstrap and work with OOo 3.3. Adding the paths to all of the OOo 3.3. jar-files to CLASSPATH does not yield success, as openoffice is not found. What is the correct/designed

[dev] MacOSX: ScirptingFramework's Edit ...

2011-02-15 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that adds ooRexx as a new macro language to OOo on the MacOSX. The tested ooRexx scripts run correctly, it is possible to create new macros (Tools - Macros - Organize Macros - ooRexx, then Run or Create, which creates a

[dev] Ubuntu desktop 10.4.1 de: Cannot start OOo, because the UI language cannot be determined !

2010-09-06 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, not having found an appropriate e-mail list to report/ask about this problem, but hoping that some soul kind can give hints/advice. Please advise what mailing list would be the appropriate one for questions like this. After a fresh install of a German Ubuntu-desktop 10.4.1 and starting

[dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?

2010-08-23 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an installation script the command-line tool unopkg is used. When starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would be running, and if one would like to proceed. Is this an expected behaviour?

[dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-16 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, not sure whether this is the correct e-mail list. If not please advise, which one would be the appropriate one. An observation, two questions ad the OOo installateion packages on http://download.openoffice.org/index.html; when entered from a German, 32-bit Ubuntu system: * the

[dev] German extension-description text with umlauts referred to in description.xml, howto ?

2010-08-07 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
It seems that the extension-description element in a description.xml file can refer to multiple files that each are authored in a different language, e.g.: extension-description src xlink:href=information/description_de.txt lang=de/ src

Re: [dev] Question ad OOo update feature ...

2010-08-02 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Joachim, thank you *very much* for the following link: You can find information about the update information here: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_the_Update_Information It really helped me set up the relevant update.xml file such

[dev] Announcement: IDL-XML-Converter - A Package for Transforming IDL into XML available ...

2010-07-29 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, today a student, Lukas Schreier, turned in his final version of a seminar paper about IDL-XML-Converter - A Package for Transforming IDL into XML. Here's the author's abstract: Author's abstract: The IDL-XML-Converter-Package is used to convert IDL to XML files. Those XML

[dev] Changed an extension from .jar to .oxt, now extension gets installed but cannot be used ?

2010-07-25 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, currently (for many years) I have been deploying a scripting extension using a .jar file, named ScriptProviderForooRexx.jar (adding the ooRexx language to OOo, such that ooRexx scripts can be dispatched via OOo as well). Now, this weekend I wanted to change the filetype to .oxt

[dev] Lifetime of Java objects representing UNO_ENUM values ?

2010-07-15 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, today I stumbled over the following interesting (read: time-consuming) problem: while caching Java objects representing individual UNO_ENUM values, all of a sudden om.sun.star.lang.DisposedException started to be thrown. Here is one such received exception message: ... getCause():

[dev] Windows' unopkg.exe does not differentiate between stderr and stdout, where does stdout go to when piping ?

2010-03-20 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, experimenting with OOo 3.2's unopkg.exe (under WindowsXP, SP3) it seems, that the output from unopkg.exe is only directed at stdout, whereas under Linux error messages (like given package not installed and the like) are directed to stderr, and normal messages to stdout. Is this

[dev] Question ad creating and deploying components, implemented in (dispatchable) scritpting languages ...

2010-01-27 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, if this is not the right list, please advise. [This e-mail is directed at d...@api.openoffice.org and dev@openoffice.org, and the Reply-To-field set to d...@openoffice.org.] After peeking around the documentation (mainly developer's guide) currently one is able to create componenents

Re: [dev] UNO API exception specifications

2009-03-11 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 03/11/09 15:12, rony wrote: [Yes, I wholeheartedly agree, that the current situation is many times frustrating, especially for beginners in an area of OOo (even experts of one or two modules are beginners if turning to new modules). There is a lot of resources that

[dev] Runtime issues, if OOo Basic invokes Java, which bootstraps its own connection to OOo ? (Hangs OOo hard, OOo Basic macro enclosed)

2009-02-12 Thread Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
Hi there, not being sure which e-mail list would be appropriate, I send it to those two that may help the most, but setting the reply-to field to d...@api.openoffice.org to avoid spamming multiple lists. If this is not appropriate please advise. Following use-case: * OOo Basic subroutine

[dev] [Fwd: New BSF4Rexx released ...]

2008-09-19 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
:New BSF4Rexx released ... Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:25:16 +0200 From: Rony G. Flatscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: RexxLA Members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, There is a new distribution of BSF4Rexx available from the official site, since today: http://wi.wu-wien.ac.at/rgf

Re: [dev] Howto get the actual interface type of an UNO service object (via Java) ?

2008-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Stephan, while poking around a little bit I was wondering, how one could get at the Type[...] information via Java that the Java proxy object reveals, if asking it to render to a string. E.g. in the following (interactive) session Java is used as the bridge for the scripting language

[dev] Howto get the actual interface type of an UNO service object (via Java) ?

2008-09-09 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, while poking around a little bit I was wondering, how one could get at the Type[...] information via Java that the Java proxy object reveals, if asking it to render to a string. E.g. in the following (interactive) session Java is used as the bridge for the scripting language ooRexx;

Re: [dev] Java 1.5 now minimal requirement ? (Re: [dev] RFC: java 1.5

2008-07-14 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Stephan Bergmann wrote: Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Hi Rony, I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement

Re: [dev] Java 1.5 now minimal requirement ? (Re: [dev] RFC: java 1.5

2008-07-13 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Kay, I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement originally were on that alias. Thank you very much for this clarification!

Re: [dev] Java 1.5 now minimal requirement ? (Re: [dev] RFC: java 1.5

2008-07-13 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Kay, I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement originally were on that alias. Thank you very much for this clarification!

[dev] FireFox 3.0 and OpenOffice-Add-on-Menu not compatible, how about a new version ?

2008-07-12 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, after upgrading to FireFox 3.0 the OpenOffice.org menu extension is Not compatible with Firefox 3.0 and therefore disabled. Are there any plans to update this little (and from time to time very helpful) add-on? ---rony

Re: [dev] FireFox 3.0 and OpenOffice-Add-on-Menu not compatible, how about a new version ?

2008-07-12 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Oliver, after upgrading to FireFox 3.0 the OpenOffice.org menu extension is Not compatible with Firefox 3.0 and therefore disabled. you can patch the extension's install.rdf: em:maxVersion3.0/em:maxVersion don't forget to delete the extensions.cache before you start again ... Thank

[dev] Java 1.5 now minimal requirement ? (Re: [dev] RFC: java 1.5

2008-07-11 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, just noticed that running DEV300/m23 with Java 1.4 does not work anymore: - cut here - E:\rony\dev\bsf\src\bintestOOo.rex Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/sun/star/comp/helper/Bootstrap (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)

Re: [dev] VCL UI Rework

2008-05-23 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Michael, On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 10:12 +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: whatever we will use in the future it will be important that we will have a GUI editor to make the design of new dialogs much more easier than today. Yep; absolutely - it's in the spec. and we have a

Re: [dev] Opening SXW files with OOo2.x

2008-05-21 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Juergen, it sounds strange and we should analyze the problems. Can you submit an issue (component writer, sw) with an example sxw document attached. As far as i know no such problems are known so far and it would be interesting to know what happens. probably totally unrelated: yesterday I

Re: [dev] RFC: java 1.5

2008-03-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Le 4 mars 08 à 15:23, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany a écrit : Hi Hubert, I don't know if you have noticed, but they are been several request from people to have OOo ported to embedded devices like Maemo and iPhone, for which Java is likely

Re: [dev] Multilanguage documents

2007-11-12 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi *, On Nov 11, 2007 3:54 AM, jonathon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rony wrote: FWIW: MS Word has been having that ability for quite a few versions now. There one would use the Language tab on styles to define what language it is used for (on that dialog

Re: [dev] WARNING: Do Not Install IBM Lotus Symphony (Beta)

2007-09-28 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Allen Pulsifer wrote: To all the OpenOffice users who might be interesting in trying out IBM Lotus Symphony (Beta): DO NOT INSTALL IBM Lotus Symphony (Beta) !!! I tried it out. It took over all of my OpenDoc file associations, without warning, and installed itself into a handful of

Re: [dev] commercial use of oo api (license issue)

2007-09-18 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Bartosz, Bartosz Sokolowski wrote: And what do you think about that: Yes, you may use OpenOffice.org binaries (the usable application) for commercial use. You may freely distribute it to any user. Please go to our download page to find the latest releases.

Re: [dev] PresentationClock

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
, Vienna, Austria Newsgroups: comp.lang.rexx Original Message Subject:[RexxLA] Announcing ooImpress-Snippets in Rexx ... Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:23:21 +0200 From: Rony G. Flatscher, VP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, since this week theOpen Office Snippets

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jürgen, yes, the way how extensions are loaded has changed a little bit. Related to this change the search of dependent jar becomes more important. Extensions are now loaded with their own classloader and you have to specify dependent jars in the manifest file of your extension jar. I see!

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jürgen, By the way you can add the scripting framework jar file manually to the classpath and can check if it works. Just tried it: does not work. Also tried using Rene Engelhards suggestion (UNO_JFW_CLASSPATH_URLS), unfortunately to no avail. Will file an issue. Thanks again for your

[dev] Filed as Issue # 81445 (Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jürgen, did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this too. (Though P1 might have been to high.) Here's the URL: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81445. Regards, ---rony

Re: [dev] Filed as Issue # 81445 (Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Juergen Schmidt wrote: Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Jürgen, did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this too. (Though P1 might have been to high.) Here's the URL: http://www.openoffice.org

[dev] How++ (Re: [dev] How about .. . (Re: [dev] Develop macro recording as it ought to be for all modules ASAP !? (Re: Vá: Re: [dev] Disabl ed Record macro menu in Impress and Draw

2007-08-29 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Matthias, Mathias Bauer wrote: But then, wouldn't this also mean that this Dispatch API is excercised by all OOo modules then, including Draw/Impress, or is it the case that for using that API some of the module-dependent (C++ implemented) UI elements still need to be programmed

Re: [dev] How about ... ( Re: [dev] Develop macro recording as it ought to be for all modules ASAP !? (Re: Vá: Re: [dev] Disabled Re cord macro menu in Impress and Draw

2007-08-28 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Matthias, So here the rule if everything is important nothing is important applies. Right! In result the project members must decide by themselves. Without any data backing up that 2 man years development time for improved automation support (plus QA etc.) will please more users than

Re: [dev] How about ... ( Re: [dev] Develop macro recording as it ought to be for all modules ASAP !? (Re: Vá: Re: [dev] Disabled Re cord macro menu in Impress and Draw

2007-08-28 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Mathias Bauer wrote: Rony G. Flatscher wrote: But there must be a mapping available which maps from UNO to C++ as otherwise the C++ code would not be invocable via UNO? Of course: this is the Dispatch API! The UI elements use die Dispatch API to call a method in a UNO object

[dev] How about ... (Re: [dev] Develop macro recording as it ought to be for all modules ASAP !? (Re: Vá: Re: [dev] Disabled Record macro menu in Impress and Draw

2007-08-27 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Matthias, Of course Draw/Impress has a macro facility but not a macro recorder and nobody wants to remove this facility. I see that this is what you meant - but please let's be accurate, rumours spread faster than you can imagine and next week you can read somewhere that we are going to

[dev] Develop macro recording as it ought t o be for all modules ASAP !? (Re: Vá: Re: [dev] Disabled Record macro menu in Impress and Draw

2007-08-24 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, the threads relating to macro recording abilities of OOo are very interesting. I have been somewhat puzzled about the conclusion that OOo should *not* have a macro facility at all and that the existing ones should be removed. The reason being that it would be too much effort for the

Re: [dev] Bug in determining Java type for UNO_LONG properties ?

2007-07-06 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jürgen, Problem: using a property's' Type attribute (prop.Type) one works with a com.sun.star.uno.Type object (cf. http://api.openoffice.org/docs/java/ref/com/sun/star/uno/Type.html) it seems that for UNO_LONG types (prop.Type.getTypeClass() returns an UNO_LONG TypeClass object), whereas

[dev] Bug in determining Java type for UNO_LONG properties ?

2007-07-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, tried to find an entry on this in the issue tracker, but have not been successful. Hence, first asking whether this is a bug in the Java interface to UNO or a misconception on my side. Problem: using a property's' Type attribute (prop.Type) one works with a com.sun.star.uno.Type

[dev] Seeking help/ideas on making com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap work on all (Linux) distributions ...

2007-03-06 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, it has been my understanding that the com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap class and its bootstrap() method are meant to allow bootstrapping OpenOffice in an easy manner/fashion on any operating system. As I have reported, on some Linux distributions that I have come to look at, the

[dev] An example program that should work on all platforms from the commandline ... (Re: [dev] Seeking help/ideas on making com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap work on all (Linux) distributions ...

2007-03-06 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, the following example program runs on many installations/platforms. However, it *should* run flawlessly on *any* OOo installation: cut here (CreateTextDocument.java)) import com.sun.star.beans.PropertyValue; import

Re: [dev] A few brief questions ad extension packages (Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

2007-02-12 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, sorry, was off for a week witohut access to e-mail, hence my late answer (keeping the quotings so only this e-mail is needed). Stephan Bergmann wrote: Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Stephan, , in the case of the ooRexx scripting engine: * there is a platform dependent DLL/so

Re: [dev] Extension Manager [was: Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java]

2007-02-12 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, Hm, if the error message tells the truth, there is some problem accessing that log.txt file. I assume you are on Linux; you could try strace -f ./unopkg gui O.K. it is 1,8 MB large, so I would not like to attach it to this e-mail. I can zip-it up and send it to you via direct

Re: [dev] Extension Manager [was: Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java]

2007-02-12 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
O.K. it is 1,8 MB large, so I would not like to attach it to this e-mail. I can zip-it up and send it to you via direct e-mail, otherwise please advise. Only of interest are lines containing log.txt. Should be few enough to post inline. (Also, does an ls -l on that log.txt file show any

Re: [dev] Extension Manager [was: Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java]

2007-02-12 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Roderick, http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54163 as mentioned in the Debian section of http://documentation.openoffice.org/setup_guide2/2.x/en/SETUP_GUIDE.pdf ? thank you for the links, and indeed, it seems that this is the same bug (even 18 months later). [Will look

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi, these were the required jar files suggested by netbeans: (i noticed you didnt mention jut.jar in the comments of your code) juh.jar jurt.jar jut.jar officebean.jar ridl.jar unoil.jar Thank you for this list, will look into it! --- Ad your environment: it seems that you have the

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi, these were the required jar files suggested by netbeans: (i noticed you didnt mention jut.jar in the comments of your code) juh.jar jurt.jar jut.jar officebean.jar ridl.jar unoil.jar One last remark: it is likely that your pacakge works because of officebean.jar. But I would

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi, In fact... officebean.jar is not required for the helloworld appit was suggested by the netbeans wizard, but it will work without it That is very interesting! Could you please either send me the jar-file (or its included manifest file) and the settings of CLASSPATH, PATH and

Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Stephan, The Ubuntu layout you described in a previous mail (libs in /usr/lib/openoffice/program, jars in /usr/share/java/openoffice) cannot work (at least not without some modifications to the OOo code base). Not sure why Ubuntu decided to ship a broken OOo (maybe they are not even aware

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jürgen, the problem is quite simple. The Ubuntu guys install OpenOffice or part of it in a way which is not supported in all cases. For example the Java UNO bootstrap mechanism depends on a specific layout (directory structure, Stephan has pointed out earlier). And yes i agree that they

[dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, thanks to everyone, I was not aware of special needs to find OOo. Ashok was kind enough to send me his jar file, and its content is: Archive: helloworld.jar testing: META-INF/OK testing: META-INF/MANIFEST.MF OK testing: org/ OK

[dev] SDK-only Java libs? (Re: [dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jim, However, *where* would one find the com.sun.star.lib.loader. package? Look in the SDK/classes directory... Get the SDK at api.openoffice.org Oh, I see. Was not aware of that at all. But this would mean that one cannot reliably deploy Java applications from the command line without

Re: [dev] SDK-only Java libs? (Re: [dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, just a stupid question: why doesn't the Bootstrap helper class use the com.sun.star.lib.loader. knowing the important role of that library to find the OO executable ? Regards, ---rony However, *where* would one find the com.sun.star.lib.loader. package? Look in the

Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Caio Tiago, thank you *very* much, your directions worked right out of the book! ;) First I deinstalled the Ubuntu OOo, then followed your instructions and was able to install the genuine OOo from the OOo homepage, getting the standard installation tree on the /opt branch. Could get the Java

Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jim, You should get the Software Development Kit from your distribution or from http://api.openoffice.org, there are examples in SDK/examples/DevelopersGuide/FirstSteps This assumes, that the Java program I use would not work. However, it is a simple test-program which has been working like

[dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, just wanted to report that the genuine OOo 2.1 can be invoked via Java from the command line, whereas the Ubuntu version cannot. Did remove the genuine OOo 2.1 and re-installed the Ubuntu OOo 2.0.4 version (the latest they have). The Ubuntu version places the binaries into

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi, ashok _ wrote: I am running oOo 2.1 on ubuntu... I am running the standard jdk 1.5.08 installation... everything works fine for me. I noticed that i had to explicitly enable Java in oOo after the installation, by going to tools-options-java and expicitly selecting a JVM there

[dev] A few brief questions ad extension packages (Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

2007-02-02 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Stephan, Feel free to come back here with any questions along your way, Thank you very much for your kind offer! Indeed, after studying your information there would be a couple of questions: * where would one find the full definition for manifest.xml and a list of valid

Re: [dev] A few brief questions ad extension packages (Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

2007-02-02 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Stephan, thank you very much for your answers! ... cut ... * ad application/vnd.sun.star.uno-component;type=native: No, such files are not put on any path. If those libraries are UNO libraries that support services/singletons, they will be found by the UNO framework via the

[dev] Roundup extension packages for scripting engines ... (Re: [dev] A few brief questions ad extension packages (Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respectiv

2007-02-02 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Stephan, after further experimentations a synopsis: * In order to install a scripting package under OOo one needs to supply a jar-file according to the scripting framework specs o if all parts are Java then adding all needed classes to that jar-file should be

Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

2007-02-01 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Stephan, thank you *very* much for your hints and pointers, which I need to follow and study in full in order to be able to experiment with it! (Will take some time, though.) If the three additional jars (bsf-v242-20070128.jar, bsf-rexx-engine.jar, oorexx-uno.jar) are only needed by

Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

2007-02-01 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Bonsoir Cedric, Stephan Bergmann a écrit : That way, your functionality (a script provider for ooRexx) comes as a self-contained entity (that can be deployed in one step via unopkg or OOo's Tools - Extension Manager...), without the need to add additional jars to special places (OOo's

Re: [dev] Ruby binding

2007-02-01 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Andrzej, Juergen Schmidt wrote: i would also go forward with JRuby first, based on top of the scripting framework and the Java UNO binding. One thing you have to do is to provide an appropriate script provider. That's already done - thanks to Mr. Rony Flatscher I only did some minor

[dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

2007-01-31 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, for finalizing a package for bridging ooRexx with OOo (UNO) I was able to create a package that can be deployed successfully with unopkg add --shared ScriptProviderForooRexx.jar The scripting language is registered and shows up in the Macro menu. In order to ease installation

Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

2007-01-31 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi there, for finalizing a package for bridging ooRexx with OOo (UNO) I was able to create a package that can be deployed successfully with unopkg add --shared ScriptProviderForooRexx.jar The scripting language is registered and shows up in the Macro menu

Re: [dev] Ruby binding

2007-01-29 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Andrzej, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: is there any kind of work going on with Ruby binding to UNO? None that I am aware of, at least. Go ahead. :) If jruby is an option for the interpreter you could make your life rather easy by taking advantage of Apache BSF (cf.

Re: [dev] Integration of the OpenOffice.org page into the Firefox browser

2006-11-07 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Kay, I have created an extension for the Firefox browser. It adds a new main menu with a list of OpenOffice.org related URLs and it adds a search context menu to the IssuesZilla and OO.o search engine. It is an easy way to access the OpenOffice.org web page Please find more on the Wiki

Re: [dev] Integration of the OpenOffice.org page into the Firefox browser

2006-11-07 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jim, I have created an extension for the Firefox browser. It adds a new main menu with a list of OpenOffice.org related URLs and it adds a search context menu to the IssuesZilla and OO.o search engine. It is an easy way to access the OpenOffice.org web page Please find more on the Wiki

Re: [dev] OpenOffice without Java

2006-06-08 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Chris Harrington wrote I have some questions regarding the use of Java in OOo. 1. Would there be any OOo performance gains by disabling Java in the build process? AFAICT no. The Java interfaces seem to be created upon demand (the very first time with a noticeable delay, after that not

Re: [dev] Document-URL file:///

2006-03-30 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Mathias Bauer wrote: Andreas Höhmann wrote: Hello, can OOo load/save documents from Urls like this: https://xyz/getFile?id=111; https://xyz/setFile?id=111; Where can i find the valid protocols for document-urls? OOo does not have built-in support for https. If you are using Gnome

Re: [dev] Greek fonts on Linux OO.o

2006-03-15 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Caolan McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 00:35 +0200, Seeker wrote: From a quick search i didn't find the issue. I refer to the problem with greek fonts. When the user types something in Greek OO.o frequently takes the characters from a font which doesn't have the suitable characters