tral/log?rev=1784838
applies (and compiles), and if it does, apply it.
Though it is moot anyway because Fedora has already been upgraded to
Thunderbird 102.2.1. But backporting security fixes should have been
considered as an option. I get the impression that it was not even
considered.
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Marius Schwarz wrote:
>> I know it was a security update for
>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-38/
>> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-38/>,
>> so better safe and live with
n https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-3033
that Thunderbird 91 is not even vulnerable to the CVEs fixed by that
advisory, only Thunderbird 102 releases (prior to the fix) were.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
security
updates.
The real issue is not the low karma threshold, but the automatic push with
no double-check from the maintainer.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:37:19PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 18:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > For an OTP generating app? I don't see why it would...
>
> No, for FIDO2 authentication.
https://github.com/ellerh/softfido
But not sure how usable it is. ;)
all open source, freely available and don't need google for
anything.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
the only real reason we need main admin is that bugzilla needs 1
specific user to assign bugs to. Perhaps we could consider this when/if
we ever move off bugzilla.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
e
respective
build is available in the build root for subsequent builds. "
But if you can see a way to be more clear there, perhaps you could put
in a PR?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@l
ter (although more noisy) to just mail all
provenpackagers every cycle and ask if anyone would like to leave the
group?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
om rawhide, can you please make a sidetag
(fedpkg request-sidetag) and tag that build in there and get all the
dependent packages rebuilt with it?
Let me know if you have any questions/need any help, happy to help out.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Fedora Accounts
> user pages links to non-existent wiki pages... it would be nice to have
> a description about them (if there's a consensus of continue listing
> them as main-admin).
Many of them the group using them has the credentials, or no one at all.
I'm not sure it's possible to
ve left this one alone for 30days, but it didn't. ;(
Perhaps it's a koji bug... :(
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
hat policy was setup before this one for packagers. ;)
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
yesterday).
Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123812 on this.
Hopefully we can sort this out, as it's the last thing I see off hand on
the switch to nspawn.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list
We can send out one announcement to epel-announce about which packages are
> going to be retired and when that'll happen, instead of retiring packages in
> a
> piecemeal manner.
>
> 3. The maintainers won't have to remember to do it.
>
> 4. If we find out that a packag
hrough the routine that it's
> not accepted.
What version of bodhi-client do you have?
You need at least 6.0.0.
Bodhi chnaged in 6.0.0 to use OpenID Connect instead of openid.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases/tag/6.0.0
So, if you use the bodhi client you need at least 6
kage groups as working groups decide are critical to their
edition' ?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
>
> It looks like I needed to do another "koji wait-repo " between the
> tag-pkg and build, but I will say that it is not obvious in any of the
> documentation I could find, that this needed.
:( Which documentation were you looking at for this?
We should try and update it...
The wait repo i
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:12:46AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 26/08/22 19:00, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:30:35PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >> With the exclusion of *-team, *-sig and *-maint,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:43:38PM -0500, Martin Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 16:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Everything should be back to working. Try a 'dnf --refresh...' or a
> > 'dnf clean all'.
> >
> Having just
> downloaded
> https://codecs
if needed. Or is somebody attempting
to veto that too?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
I think there should be some check
> to prevent users removed from packager group to maintain commit rights.
> No idea where/how to implement that.
I don't think it happens too often. We could make a script that checks
it from time to time tho. Might be a good cadidate for a toddler (
https:/
for the trouble.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US
into rawhide
also, it would take releng manually tagging them in, bypassing bodhi,
gating and CI completely. It's much better to build again for
f38/rawhide and let those builds get checked by gating and CI, etc.
If you run into any problems, let me know...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lso the other arguments complete garbage.)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/proj
Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Icons are not code.
Even if they are compiled into a code binary as a resource file (as seem to
be often done in this case)?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
luntly, I believe package deprecation should not exist or be
allowed at all.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduc
s to
fix them. We can only fix what we know about, and blackhats can only attack
what they know about.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fe
e unable to deal with the security
vulnerabilities is to simply orphan the library and let someone else pick it
up. (If nobody else does, I will, because at least 3 of my packages depend
on it.)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
awn change. ;(
Running the ostree post:
DEBUG util.py:445: error: Writing content object: Setting xattrs:
fsetxattr(security.selinux): Invalid argument
Hopefully we can figure a solution soon.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
de
--disablerepo=*
> > > --enablerepo=rawhide --source $rpm;done|sort|uniq
> > >
> >
> > Did you just build directly in Rawhide after listing *61* packages
> > that would break from the update?
> > Please please use a side tag next time.
> >
>
>
I just edited the f38 tag at Mon Aug 22 08:29:51 PM UTC 2022 to switch
to nspawn.
If you have detected a issue that seems like it might be related to this
change, please file a releng ticket and we will dig into it.
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> There's a pretty decent write-up about this on LWN:
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/904892/
>
> Here's a link that actually works:
> https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/904892/dba951441b61cbdc/
> (Putting the title and &qu
ine does wonders.)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List G
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 11:18:14PM -0400, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 09:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Since everyone seems postivie on this, I'll look at switching it on
> > monday and see what breaks.
>
> Does this apply just to package bu
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 04:50:07PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen Smoogen:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 05:44, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * Kevin Fenzi:
> >
> > > Greetings everyone.
> > >
> > > Many years ago mock intr
rnel from Linux 5.20 to Linux 6.0, without even any
reason for the bump other than "the second number is getting too large", so
my proposal would work similarly, but less arbitrarily and more in the
spirit of semantic versioning.
Kevin Kofler
to this will:
* More closely match developers local test mock builds.
* Provide better isolation for builds
* Help with resources as systemd-nspawn is a lot more cgroup aware than
chroot
* Allow us to close a 5 year old ticket. ;)
Thoughts?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
w whoever wants to maintain it can probably fix it.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
tly is when Fedora n is about to reach its EOL).
Now, I think there would be a huge outcry if Fedora did this the Microsoft
way with no way to opt out (I would be one of the first to complain), but
claiming that Windows does not do this is just wrong.
Kevin Kofler
s suggestion is to link it as an additional dynamic
shared object, so then the order of linking is important, and you also have
to take care to link it into all applications (and there are lots of build
systems out there). The alternative, I suppose, would be to modify glibc.
Leigh Scott wrote:
> Shouldn't asio package be retired as it's provided by boost-devel?
>
> /usr/include/boost/asio/
It is unfortunately not a drop-in replacement:
https://think-async.com/Asio/AsioAndBoostAsio.html
Kevin Kofler
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 09:14:17AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On 8/7/22 3:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Or just wait... I have been checking them a few times a day and
> > rebooting any that are locked up.
> How long do we have to wait? [1] has been stuck since
>
in ~/.config/python-bugzilla/bugzillarc
As so:
[bugzilla.redhat.com]
api_key=THEAPIKEY
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
0 code that was unilaterally relicensed by a third
party.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproje
ying to figure out a way to get them stable.
Sorry for the hassle, and thanks for noting it.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor
just
pagure-dist-git for this case to make it more self-service.
(taking orphan packages over).
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-dev
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> I do not see why we need to give FDK-AAC a blanket pass just because a
> team at Red Hat decided to work on it first and send the licence for legal
> review afterwards (which is entirely the wrong order in which to do
> things).
PS: Especially now that
other clauses of dubious freeness in that license, the
exclusion of patent grants is not even the worst IMHO.)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> But then fdk-aac-free is also not allowed in Fedora and should be removed:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FDK-AAC
>
> | 3. NO PATENT LICENSE
> |
> | NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED LICENSES TO ANY PATENT CLAIMS, including without
> | l
not acceptable for software? (I have seen that
used for code by some people who, I assume, liked the idea of copyleft, but
not the GNU project. I do not know whether any of that code has ever made it
into Fedora though.)
Kevin Kofler
___
de
ly to happen immediately.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproje
o?taskID=90394095
> > >
> > > The above link says there are multiple buildroots. What does it mean?
> > > s390x build is killed and repeated due to some specific issue on
> > > s390x server?
> >
> > usually the build killed and restarted due OOM, but this is
m in 2008 can
be regenerated with current autotools with only 6 patches (2 of which only
fix hardcoded maximum version numbers).
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
ure
stuff without running autoreconf is always a pain. (By the way, autoreconf
with no arguments is not all that helpful, you need at least
"autoreconf -i -f". That is just one of the many annoyances with the
autotools.)
Kevin Kofler
sue? It definitely seems like it missed some.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:43:39PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:04:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 25. 07. 22 17:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > 21713 builds have been tagged into f37, there is currently 1144 failed
> > > build
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:04:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 07. 22 17:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 21713 builds have been tagged into f37, there is currently 1144 failed
> > builds that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs
> >
binding, do not have to
be rebuilt? (E.g., okular.)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en
(checked with 5.15.8, but that is the order of magnitude for all versions)
to check the license header, if there is any to begin with. (Some of the
bundled libraries are of the "let's just drop in one license file that
applies to everything" kind, and it is named differently
e (binaries from specific parties can be
> blocked by the CiPolicy/SiPolicy which is Microsoft's current
> Windows-specific revocation list du jour), but UEFI firmware does not
> (yet).
only Windows understands this attribute?
Kevin Kofler
other LInux distributions and in
> upstream projects generally.
With at least one notable exception:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#cdrtools
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
o trust the global license file to tell the truth.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/p
Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 10:35 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
>> What I see is that the hacks that you apply to configure are apparently
>> not working:
>>
>> checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object...
>&g
();/g' ./configure
+ /usr/bin/sed -r --in-place=.backup 's/^char \$2 \(\);/__attribute__
((used)) char \$2 ();/g' ./configure
that is not accepted by the C++ compiler?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
Boot will also do it.)
It makes me particularly sad when I see GNU/Linux developers touting the
purported security merits of Restricted Boot and TPM Treacherous Computing
in their blogs.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
eme.
(By the way, the name "Bitlocker" even SOUNDS like a ransomware.)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
h
ect.org/rpms/qt5-qtwebengine/blob/b22f6246a6afa4b7e212be3eedabc366938df78b/f/qt5-qtwebengine.spec#_70
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
locker behind the user's back, i.e., also without prompting
for a passphrase, provides absolutely no security in the event of a stolen
notebook because somebody else hitting the power button will NOT change the
TPM measurements, the power button is not a
anyone still believe
that all this is about security?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/
Chris Murphy wrote:
> It's a Rube Goldberg machine way of doing this.
Isn't that the Unix Way?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora C
Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not,
>> instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a systemd-boot
>> configured to always bootnext to Windows?
l think it boots
Windows directly. (I do not see why it would notice any difference, all that
would change is the name of the image that gets chainloaded.) And systemd-
boot does not need to know that it is being chainloaded from GRUB. So I do
not see why that would not work, without any changes to the
project.org.
If you want to watch activity on a package you want The little 'watch'
pulldown under The package description. You can set there if you want to
watch bugs, commits, both, etc. If you only wanted to watch koji builds,
you would need to set that in FMN ( apps.fedoraproject.org/notifica
gt; centric.
>
> The bigger problem is the version was reset from something 2.x
2.1.8.20140319 is what is now in Rawhide.
> back to 1.0.0, the current version being 1.10.
How about Name: libphidget, Version: 2.2.1.10?
Kevin Kofler
__
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 37 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora
37 on 2022/07/20. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 for:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and moved over to
f37. Failures can be seen
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 37 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora
37 on 2022/07/20. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 for:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and moved over to
f37. Failures can be seen
tinygo
tnt
trace-gui
twincam
vera++
vttest
wasmedge
webkit2gtk3
xfce4-soundmenu-plugin
xsetpointer
zeek
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 02:49:53PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
> >
> > Also, the signing queue is all caught up.
>
> Can you take a look at gap-4.11.1-
n pcre as a compatibility
library for the foreseeable future.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproje
up again. :)
Yeah, I am pretty amazed by that. ;)
Currently it's pretty heavily patched... we still want to move to the
python3 one. Hopefully next week.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:09:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
...snip...
>
> So, as long as that sidetag update goes out all should be fine.
The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
Also, the sign
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > We have had several issues in the last few days sadly.
> > I think your build ran into systemd-oomd running on some builders after
> > I ha
rs can be
effectively blocked by policy from importing upstream software that is not
yet packaged in Fedora.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
Please just orphan it instead. Then either
somebody else will take care of the package, or it will eventually
automatically get retired. In this case, it is quite likely that it will be
taken up. (In fact, if nobody else does, I will probably have to take it
ng
So, submit and pass a review, then file a releng ticket to get it
unblocked. :)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor
ibly a timing issue where tests on ppc64le happen to take "too
> > long" and pytest gets killed?
>
> It sounds like this might've been a transient issue, likely related to
> something on the builder, as it also worked fine when I scratch built
> it. The releng folks can pro
ould consider a drop of supported hardware to be a major
change and hence inherently system-wide, and also something that should not
be dropped upon users late in the release cycle without prior warning,
catching them off-guard. (That said, I do not know how many, if any, users
of pre-z13 s390x exist in th
to render. I have had to fix a couple of these. So
seccomp is definitely used.)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
to Emacs version 28, so it's
already in F36. How is that possible?
--
Kevin P. Fleming
He/Him/His
Principal Program Manager, RHEL
Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 20/07/2022 16:50, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> There is a lag, but it is less than the average lag we add in Fedora.
>>
>> E.g., the security fixes from Chromium 100 were backported to
>> qtwebengine- chromium git after 1 month,
Hi all,
Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild
on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild
for the changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged
when
Hi all,
Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild
on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild
for the changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged
when
PS:
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> (*) These features require the KDE KF5/Plasma integration plugin, i.e.,
> the optional falkon-kde subpackage. Everything else is built-in into
> Falkon and/or Qt.
The gopher:// example also requires the kio_gopher package, which is not
installed b
cause QtWebEngine is 99+% compatible with Chrome.) And my
smartphone is a PinePhone running Plasma Mobile, on which I use Angelfish as
my one and only browser, a mobile browser also using QtWebEngine.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@
Hi Ankur,
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 03:58:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> So, since all current maintainers of qt5-qtwebengine, including me, are
>> failing badly at keeping the package up to date with security fixes, this
>> is an urgent plea
security
fixes (5.15.10 includes backported security fixes up to Chromium 100).
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
JavaScript in its HTML
views.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-c
, are
failing badly at keeping the package up to date with security fixes, this is
an urgent plea for help. The current situation is not acceptable, any
helping hands to improve on it would be extremely welcome. I have admin
rights to the package, so I can add comaintainers that wish so.
Kevin
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> klamav kkofler
> koffice-kivio kkofler, rdieter
These are fixed now, successfully built in Rawhide, and I have closed the
bugs. So they should disappear from your report next time.
Kevin
901 - 1000 of 9269 matches
Mail list logo
