On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 12:45:23AM +, Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> No, it shouldn't. char* et al. are not string types in D.
> to!(char*)(string) just doesn't make sense.
If you need to convert between D strings and char*, wchar*, etc., e.g.,
for interfacing with
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 10:38:31PM +, Mark via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> Ok. So by using '==' it should compare the addresses of the objects?
[...]
No, `==` is for comparing the *contents* of the objects. You need to
implement opEquals() for the objects being compared in order to
On 6/3/17 10:30, Jakub Szewczyk wrote:
Mono runtime is a cross-platform, open-source alternative to Microsoft's
.NET framework [1], and it can be embedded in other applications as a
"scripting" VM, but with JIT-compilation enhanced performance and
support of many languages such as C#, F# or
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 05:12:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
As the enum has no address, it can't store anything. So,
_anything_ that's an enum is going to be effectively
copy-pasted everywhere that it's used. The compiler is smart
enough to just copy-past the result and not the
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 03:00:56PM -0700, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 06/03/2017 12:12 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
> > I'd say this deserves a blog post but it would be too short.
>
> I made many good friends at C++Now. Some of them know Atila from
> CppCon and other C++
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 23:18:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Do you know what happened with fastcsv [0], original thread [1].
[0] https://github.com/quickfur/fastcsv
[1]
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.3952.1453600915.22025.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com
I do not. Rereading that in
On Sunday, June 04, 2017 04:47:56 Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 04:39:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 04:34:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> >> I would not have expected enum b = sort(a) to trigger an
> >> allocation. auto b, yes, of course
On Sunday, 28 May 2017 at 22:26:18 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi Guys,
I just fixed the sliceAssignment!
now overlapping assignments are correctly detected.
I also re-enabled a bailout on struct-member operation which
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 04:47:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 04:39:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I thought that assigning the result of a function call to an
enum would force a compile-time evaluation of the function, so
I would expect enum b = call(lit) to be
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 04:39:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 04:34:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I would not have expected enum b = sort(a) to trigger an
allocation. auto b, yes, of course (and the disassembly from
that is not much different). So I'd love to see a blog
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 04:34:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I would not have expected enum b = sort(a) to trigger an
allocation. auto b, yes, of course (and the disassembly from
that is not much different). So I'd love to see a blog post
explaining it.
I don't think I can do a full-on blog
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 03:28:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 06/03/2017 07:41 PM, jmh530 wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:18:06 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
There is no mistake. (But 'auto' is redundant.)
void main() {
import std.algorithm, std.stdio;
enum a = [ 3, 1, 2,
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 23:41:37 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:18:06 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
There is no mistake. (But 'auto' is redundant.)
void main() {
import std.algorithm, std.stdio;
enum a = [ 3, 1, 2, 4, 0 ];
enum b = sort(a);// static is not CT
On 06/03/2017 07:41 PM, jmh530 wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:18:06 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
There is no mistake. (But 'auto' is redundant.)
void main() {
import std.algorithm, std.stdio;
enum a = [ 3, 1, 2, 4, 0 ];
enum b = sort(a);// static is not CT !
static
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:29:04 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:18:59 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 18:45:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-06-03 20:31, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
But is this sort guaranteed to happen at
On 6/3/2017 5:20 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:06:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/3/2017 12:28 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
Personally, making contracts less verbose and more powerful is much higher on
my list
We did discuss bouncing the DIP back with a request
Suppose I need to allocate several dynamic arrays of different
types and/or sizes. An obvious choice is to do just that: perform
N allocations.
But given that I know all the sizes, and also am pretty sure that
each of the arrays will have the same lifespan, why would I do N
allocations when I
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 23:36:18 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_utf.html#toUTF16z
This didn't work. More errors than the first.
Works for me:
void main()
{
import std.conv;
import std.stdio;
import core.stdc.wchar_;
import core.stdc.stdio;
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 23:43:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
If that's the only change, then we have a serious issue with
the text of this DIP. I think the DIP must be corrected with
the following change. Please review and then change the DIP
accordingly:
from: "Add do as an optional
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:06:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/3/2017 12:28 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
Personally, making contracts less verbose and more powerful is
much higher on my list
We did discuss bouncing the DIP back with a request to revamp
it as a complete overhaul of
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 23:13:09 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Good idea, name of global needs to be known in advance though.
Why, and how would that be a non-trivial problem?
— David
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 19:29:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
What are your thoughts? Has something similar been proposed
before?
https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP30
Also, while no syntax is provided, this is how SDC works
internally and this is how it can handle multiple context
pointers.
FWIW, I
On 06/03/2017 04:36 PM, Mike B Johnson wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 23:09:56 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:54:22 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
How to convert a string to wchar*?
C-style null-terminated wchar*?
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_utf.html#toUTF16z
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 23:32:44 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
...
Ali
Awesome, that might be handy in the near future.
Thanks.
On 06/02/2017 11:44 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> Yes, count me somewhat disappointed at merely changing `body` to `do`.
If that's the only change, then we have a serious issue with the text of
this DIP. I think the DIP must be corrected with the following change.
Please
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 21:00:43 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
That is my conclusion too. Is your library in a usable state?
Perhaps we should not repeat efforts, though I wasn't planning
on making a robust public library for it :)
After some consideration you can now find the
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:18:06 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
There is no mistake. (But 'auto' is redundant.)
void main() {
import std.algorithm, std.stdio;
enum a = [ 3, 1, 2, 4, 0 ];
enum b = sort(a);// static is not CT !
static assert(b[0] == 0); // does not pass with
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 15:02:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
In fact, you could simulate overloading of return values based
on IFTI instantiation:
void fooImpl(ref int retval, int x) { ... }
void fooImpl(ref string retval, int x) { ... }
T foo(T)(int x) { T t; fooImpl(t, x); return
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 23:09:56 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:54:22 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
How to convert a string to wchar*?
C-style null-terminated wchar*?
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_utf.html#toUTF16z
This didn't work. More errors than the first.
On 06/03/2017 03:38 PM, Mark wrote:
> Ok. So by using '==' it should compare the addresses of the objects?
That's the default behavior. You can change it with opEquals:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/object.html#ix_object.opEquals
I think you want to use the 'is' operator:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 04:25:27 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Author here:
The discussion[1] and articles[2] around "Faster Command Line
Tools" had me trying out std.csv for the task.
Now I know std.csv isn't fast and it allocates. When I wrote my
CSV parser, I'd also left around a parser
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 14:12:28 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 12:13:41 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Alas no. __attribute__((target(...)) works because it
targeting different targets of the _same_ backend, this
targets different backends.
But surely you could
On Saturday, June 03, 2017 17:16:52 Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 2017-06-02 16:17, Mike Parker wrote:
> > Congratulations are in order for Jared Hanson. Walter and Andrei have
> > approved his proposal to remove body as a keyword. I've added a summary
> > of their
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:54:22 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
How to convert a string to wchar*?
C-style null-terminated wchar*?
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_utf.html#toUTF16z
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:52:42 UTC, Mark wrote:
Thanks again.
Nevermind, I got it.
How to convert a string to wchar*?
string s;
to!(wchar*)(s)
gives phobo's deduction problems.
\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\conv.d(194): Error:
template std.conv.toImpl cannot deduce function from argument
types !(wchar*)(string), candidates are:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:38:31 UTC, Mark wrote:
In the future I'll include a compilable example. I was having
problems with a class I made which is about 45 lines, that
might be a lot of code for a post.
You can use external resources such as:
https://d.godbolt.org/
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 22:38:31 UTC, Mark wrote:
...
Thanks.
Actually, I got another question,
how Can I obtain the actual memory address of a class?
I'll still need to solve the problem of taking ints/floats/reals
etc., as well as structs and classes and sending them right/left
in
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:24:44 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
By default, they act the same. But you can change how `==`
behaves by overriding `opEquals`. You cannot override `is`.
Ok. So by using '==' it should compare the addresses of the
objects?
I think I didn't include the other file as
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:30:05 UTC, Jakub Szewczyk wrote:
Mono runtime is a cross-platform, open-source alternative to
Microsoft's .NET framework [1], and it can be embedded in other
applications as a "scripting" VM, but with JIT-compilation
enhanced performance and support of many
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 09:52:45 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
Great news, thanks Martin. I'll update the snap packages over
the weekend. :-)
Done.
sudo snap refresh --classic --edge dmd
should upgrade things for anyone who already has the package
install; otherwise,
sudo
On 03.06.2017 22:16, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:12:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:32:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 06/03/2017 01:03 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Björn Fahller has done compile time sort in C++17
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:46:45 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:39:54 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
It's always true, because I explicitly wrote *might*, not
*will*, to indicate that it depends on your use case. Your
example is a common use case where you can't
On 06/03/2017 12:12 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I'd say this deserves a blog post but it would be too short.
I made many good friends at C++Now. Some of them know Atila from CppCon
and other C++ conferences. (Beer involved. :) ) They told me Atila would
routinely tell them during C++
On 06/03/2017 11:59 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I've been looking a bit at the design of the hooks in
std.experimental.checkedint. Due to all hooks being optional there's
quite a few "static if" in the implementation of checkedint to check if
a hook is implemented.
Wouldn't it be simpler if
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:39:54 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:16:08 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:53:05 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
Quite, but if you backtrack to my initial statement, it was
about ptr not being/becoming null
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:30:05 UTC, Jakub Szewczyk wrote:
Mono runtime is a cross-platform, open-source alternative to
Microsoft's .NET framework [1], and it can be embedded in other
applications as a "scripting" VM, but with JIT-compilation
enhanced performance and support of many
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:17:18 UTC, Seb wrote:
I understand the problem, but there's only so much Martin can
do in his free time.
I'm not asking anyone to do the work. I'm asking for a clear
recognition that this is a problem that should be fixed. I'm
also asking for a clear
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:16:08 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:53:05 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Quite, but if you backtrack to my initial statement, it was
about ptr not being/becoming null (implicitly) in the first
place, which *might* allow you to skip
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:12:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:32:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 06/03/2017 01:03 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Björn Fahller has done compile time sort in C++17 here
http://playfulpr
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 21:04:16 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 06/03/2017 10:29 PM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Meep. Wrong :)
Static initializers for static variables and constants are
evaluated at compile time, initializing them with runtime
values is a compile-time error.
Meep. Meep. I
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:57:36 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
It's a mistake that remains tolerated, despite the problem
being known and having an associated issue, because the
dlang/installer scripts work around it, meaning the fundamental
problem never gets fixed.
I understand
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:53:05 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:25:22 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:13:30 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
Calling std.algorithm.move is explicit programmer intent, I
consider that about as accidental as
On 06/03/2017 10:29 PM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Meep. Wrong :)
Static initializers for static variables and constants are evaluated at
compile time, initializing them with runtime values is a compile-time
error.
Meep. Meep. I wouldn't say you're wrong, but there's nitpicking to be done.
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:25:22 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:13:30 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Calling std.algorithm.move is explicit programmer intent, I
consider that about as accidental as calling memcpy with a
source full of zeroes.
In any case, having
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:18:59 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 18:45:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-06-03 20:31, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
But is this sort guaranteed to happen at compile time rather
than
runtime?
Yes. It's the context that
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:13:30 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Calling std.algorithm.move is explicit programmer intent, I
consider that about as accidental as calling memcpy with a
source full of zeroes.
In any case, having that check in the destructor is fairly
cheap, so better safe than
On 06/03/2017 10:02 PM, Mark wrote:
auto A = new Box();
auto B = new Box();
if(A.opEquals(B)) {}
gives the error
test.o:(.data.rel.ro+0x18): undefined reference to
`_D5Stack12__ModuleInfoZ'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Error: linker exited with status 1
Your code works for
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:02:13 UTC, Mark wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:57:47 UTC, Mark wrote:
Hello again.
I'm designing a template version of a BST.
Because of this, I want to be able to compare if two objects
of the same class type are references to the same anonymous
class
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:02:13 UTC, Mark wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:57:47 UTC, Mark wrote:
Hello again.
I'm designing a template version of a BST.
Because of this, I want to be able to compare if two objects
of the same class type are references to the same anonymous
class
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 18:45:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-06-03 20:31, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
But is this sort guaranteed to happen at compile time rather
than
runtime?
Yes. It's the context that decides if it occurs at compile time
or at runtime.
Something
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:12:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:32:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 06/03/2017 01:03 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Björn Fahller has done compile time sort in C++17 here
http://playfulpr
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:55:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 06/03/2017 09:37 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Of course, but AFAIK you'd need to explicitly assign it to an
object, so `ptr` won't null by accident, but only by explicit
programmer intent (same as overwriting the memory the object
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 05:21:13 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 16:08:20 UTC, Zz wrote:
Hi,
Just tried migrating from std.experimental.ndslice to
mir-algorithm.
Is there a guide on how migrate old code?
I used the following imports before and using then with
ndslice.
On 6/3/2017 12:28 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
Personally, making contracts less verbose and more powerful is much higher on my
list
We did discuss bouncing the DIP back with a request to revamp it as a complete
overhaul of the contract syntax, but decided that this DIP was about
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:12:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:32:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 06/03/2017 01:03 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Björn Fahller has done compile time sort in C++17 here
http://playfulpr
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:55:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 06/03/2017 09:37 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Of course, but AFAIK you'd need to explicitly assign it to an
object, so `ptr` won't null by accident, but only by explicit
programmer intent (same as overwriting the memory the object
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:57:47 UTC, Mark wrote:
Hello again.
I'm designing a template version of a BST.
Because of this, I want to be able to compare if two objects of
the same class type are references to the same anonymous class
on the heap somewhere.
Example:
Not sure what
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:31:51 UTC, Seb wrote:
Tags are only made from the stable branch.
The point is that the VERSION file is wrong in the officially
tagged release source.
Well, as mentioned minor point releases have never been changed
in the git repo before:
Hello again.
I'm designing a template version of a BST.
Because of this, I want to be able to compare if two objects of
the same class type are references to the same anonymous class on
the heap somewhere.
Example:
On 06/03/2017 09:37 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Of course, but AFAIK you'd need to explicitly assign it to an object, so
`ptr` won't null by accident, but only by explicit programmer intent
(same as overwriting the memory the object lives in via things like
`memcpy`); and you can always screw
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:21:58 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 06/03/2017 09:06 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
- null check in destructor: That's just because I forgot to
add it. If you add `@disable(this)` (disable the default
constructor), all elaborate constructors ensure it is not
null, and no
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:02:36 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 18:42:57 UTC, Seb wrote:
So, I guess your problem is the VERSION file on the dmd stable
branch?
No, it's the VERSION file present if one checks out the
v2.074.1 tag.
Tags are only made from
On 06/03/2017 09:06 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
- null check in destructor: That's just because I forgot to add it. If
you add `@disable(this)` (disable the default constructor), all
elaborate constructors ensure it is not null, and no members can set it
to null, you might be able to skip the
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:32:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 06/03/2017 01:03 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Björn Fahller has done compile time sort in C++17 here
http://playfulpr
ogramming.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/constexpr-quicksort-in-c17.html
Surely D can do better?
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:02:36 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
The point is here that this keeps happening.
The relevant issue (filed over a year ago):
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15910
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:40:32 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Would one be considered more idiomatic D, or is it a
question of different circumstances different approaches. The
differences are mainly in construction I believe.
Well, the differences I spot are:
- null check in destructor:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 18:42:57 UTC, Seb wrote:
So, I guess your problem is the VERSION file on the dmd stable
branch?
No, it's the VERSION file present if one checks out the v2.074.1
tag.
I suspect this doesn't show up in the official packages because
IIRC the VERSION file is edited
On 2017-06-03 20:31, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
But is this sort guaranteed to happen at compile time rather than
runtime?
Yes. It's the context that decides if it occurs at compile time or at
runtime.
Something declared as "static" or "enum" requires that the value can be
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 18:31:37 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 13:32 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars- d wrote:
[…]
There is nothing to do really. Just use standard library sort.
void main() {
import std.algorithm, std.stdio;
enum a = [ 3, 1, 2,
On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 13:32 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-
d wrote:
> […]
>
> There is nothing to do really. Just use standard library sort.
>
> void main() {
> import std.algorithm, std.stdio;
> enum a = [ 3, 1, 2, 4, 0 ];
> static auto b = sort(a);
>
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 21:04:00 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
This point release fixes a few issues over 2.074.0, see the
changelog for more details.
I'm afraid that the release has another fault: the VERSION file
still gives 2.074.0. This means that unless it is edited during
the build
Thanks to Moritz and Stanislav for their examples, most useful. There
are similarities (which I have just taken :-) but also some
differences. Would one be considered more idiomatic D, or is it a
question of different circumstances different approaches. The
differences are mainly in construction I
Mono runtime is a cross-platform, open-source alternative to
Microsoft's .NET framework [1], and it can be embedded in other
applications as a "scripting" VM, but with JIT-compilation
enhanced performance and support of many languages such as C#, F#
or IronPython [2].
It provides a C API, so
On 06/03/2017 01:03 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Björn Fahller has done compile time sort in C++17 here http://playfulpr
ogramming.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/constexpr-quicksort-in-c17.html
Surely D can do better?
There is nothing to do really. Just use standard library sort.
void
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 17:24:08 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
So why isn't rdmd shipped as a separate thing if it can wrap
any of the three compilers?
it is... the link above is all there is to it, you simply compile
it. The docs also call it a download: http://dlang.org/rdmd.html
dmd just
On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 17:08 +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 05:04:24 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > Not enough is made of rdmd. rdmd needs to be separated from dmd
> > so it works with gdc and ldc2.
>
> rdmd has always worked with them, at least
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 05:04:24 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Not enough is made of rdmd. rdmd needs to be separated from dmd
so it works with gdc and ldc2.
rdmd has always worked with them, at least with their gdmd and
ldmd wrappers
https://github.com/dlang/tools/blob/master/rdmd.d#L46
Björn Fahller has done compile time sort in C++17 here http://playfulpr
ogramming.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/constexpr-quicksort-in-c17.html
Surely D can do better?
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200
On 06/03/2017 11:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/2/17 10:17 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
Congratulations are in order for Jared Hanson. Walter and Andrei have
approved his proposal to remove body as a keyword. I've added a
summary of their decision to the end of the DIP for anyone who cares
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 16:22:33 UTC, Francis Nixon wrote:
When looking at std.variant I found the following line:
return q{
static if (allowed!%1$s && T.allowed!%1$s)
if (convertsTo!%1$s && other.convertsTo!%1$s)
return VariantN(get!%1$s %2$s other.get!%1$s);
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 16:22:33 UTC, Francis Nixon wrote:
When looking at std.variant I found the following line:
return q{
static if (allowed!%1$s && T.allowed!%1$s)
if (convertsTo!%1$s && other.convertsTo!%1$s)
return VariantN(get!%1$s %2$s other.get!%1$s);
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 16:22:33 UTC, Francis Nixon wrote:
When looking at std.variant I found the following line:
return q{
static if (allowed!%1$s && T.allowed!%1$s)
if (convertsTo!%1$s && other.convertsTo!%1$s)
return VariantN(get!%1$s %2$s other.get!%1$s);
When looking at std.variant I found the following line:
return q{
static if (allowed!%1$s && T.allowed!%1$s)
if (convertsTo!%1$s && other.convertsTo!%1$s)
return VariantN(get!%1$s %2$s other.get!%1$s);
}.format(tp, op);
I was wondering what exactly the % signs where
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 07:01:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/2/2017 9:56 PM, MysticZach wrote:
Also Mike Parker seems to be doing a very good job in his
appointed position as DIP manager.
Yes, I am very happy with Mike's contributions on this, as well
as on his blog work. We are very
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 14:59:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Would it be reasonable for the compiler to check for duplicated
keys in an associative array literal where all the keys are
known at compile time? For example:
auto aa = ["foo": 1, "foo": 1];
You can write one yourself as soon
I've been looking a bit at the design of the hooks in
std.experimental.checkedint. Due to all hooks being optional there's
quite a few "static if" in the implementation of checkedint to check if
a hook is implemented.
Wouldn't it be simpler if all hooks were required and a default
On 03/06/2017 4:43 PM, Lewis wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 09:28:03 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
A lot of this can be done by simply implementing shared libraries
fully on Windows. There is a reason why TypeInfo doesn't cross the dll
boundary right now. Sadly it isn't a high priority (and
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 09:28:03 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
A lot of this can be done by simply implementing shared
libraries fully on Windows. There is a reason why TypeInfo
doesn't cross the dll boundary right now. Sadly it isn't a high
priority (and it really really needs to be "just
On 2017-06-02 23:14, Seiji Emery wrote:
The main worry that I have is that this could
somehow wreak havoc with the GC-managed payload pointer, but I'm not
sure.
As long as you cast between different type of delegates I don't think it
would be a problem. The context pointer is always void*
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
