On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 10:57:26 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
See lines:
- Input!IR temp = input;
- input = temp;
bool commentLine() {
Input!IR temp = input;
(...)
if (!temp.empty) {
(...)
input = temp;
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 08:53:31 UTC, drug wrote:
14.02.2018 11:45, Ola Fosheim Grøstad пишет:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to
revive my blog
On 14/02/2018 2:02 PM, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 10:57:26 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
See lines:
- Input!IR temp = input;
- input = temp;
bool commentLine() {
Input!IR temp = input;
(...)
if (!temp.empty) {
(...)
input =
On 14/02/2018 10:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 10:14:44 Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
It looks like EntityRange requires forward range, is it ok for a
parser?
It's very difficult in general to write a parser that isn't at least a
forward range,
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 09:42:47 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
Seb,
I believe this blog post would make a great article for
Overload or CVu.
Cool idea, but I'm not so familiar with these. What can/should I
do to make this happen?
We can also talk in private (seb [at] wilzba [dot]
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 08:53:31 UTC, drug wrote:
It's sadly that using most C++17 features fails to provide
clean and compact solution...
I don't usually use iostream, but this "challenge" was a
reasonable fit for it. If you look over the 4 submissions then
the iostream one
14.02.2018 11:45, Ola Fosheim Grøstad пишет:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread today and
I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive my blog and
finally write an article showing why I like D so much:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On 02/13/2018 01:15 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 15:20:29 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
On Monday, 16 November 2015 at 15:20:51 UTC, Andrei
Congratulations to everybody who co
Andrei
Old post but new numbers!
http://erdani.com/d/downloads.daily.png
Would be
Seb,
I believe this blog post would make a great article for Overload or
CVu.
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 23:35 +, Seb via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
> today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive my
> blog and
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 22:29:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
- provide some way of hooking into non-default entities so that
DTD-defined entities can be expanded by the DTD
implementation.
The parser now returns raw text, entity replacement can be done
by DTD processor without any
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much
I first looked into C++ and Rust examples,
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 22:00:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 21:18:12 Patrick Schluter via
Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
[...]
Well, if dxml just passes the entity references along unparsed
beyond validating that the entity reference itself contains
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 09:50:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
If C++ isn't viewed as a competitor, why bother with repetitive
complaining about C++?
Because it doesn't get enough criticism ;-)
I believe the programming langauges of the future, and the ones
people should invest
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 10:14:44 Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> It looks like EntityRange requires forward range, is it ok for a
> parser?
It's very difficult in general to write a parser that isn't at least a
forward range, because without that, you're stuck at only one
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 09:28:48 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
yeah.. even the more modern C++ code still makes me want to
stay clear of it...(perhaps even more so).
I just never get the same feeling when I look at D programs.
I get the same feeling from both languages, to be honest.
On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 10:03:45 Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 22:00:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 21:18:12 Patrick Schluter via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > Well,
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 22:13:36 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Ironically, the general advice I found online w.r.t XML
vulnerabilities is "don't allow DTDs", "don't expand entities",
"don't resolve externals", etc.. There also aren't many XML
parsers out there that fully support all the
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 08:06:13 UTC, Mike Franklin
wrote:
Aren’t you concered that Rust is faster in this benchmark?
Not at all. The challenge was to write expressive code and if
performance really matters I can always opt to optimize the
hot path of the program and don’t need to
cblas v2.0.1.
- Fixed aliases for i?max.
- API was marked as pure.
lapack v0.0.3
- sysv_rook was added
- API was marked as pure.
mir-blas v0.1.0
- ger, scal, swap, asum, scal, copy, axpy wrappers for ndslice
were added
mir-lapack v0.0.5
- sysv_rook wrapper for ndslice was added
A lot
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 10:17:21 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
I believe the programming langauges of the future, and the ones
people should invest their time learning, are those that can be
best understood in the least amount of time.
Yes, I would say so, unless they bring something
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 13:21 +, Seb via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 09:42:47 UTC, Russel Winder
> wrote:
> > Seb,
> >
> > I believe this blog post would make a great article for
> > Overload or CVu.
>
> Cool idea, but I'm not so familiar with these.
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 14:17:31 UTC, Seb wrote:
changed the text to:
...and D even supports native interoperability with C and most
of C++.
Great!
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 15:14:22 UTC, 9il wrote:
Docs: http://docs.algorithm.dlang.io/latest/index.html
http://docs.random.dlang.io/latest/index.html
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 14:24:25 UTC, 9il wrote:
[snip]
Great.
mir-random
Advanced Random Number Generators.
Mir Random can be used as betterC library or with
default/different thread local random engines.
Mir Random v0.4.0
1. default params from random variable constructors was removed
2. convention functions for random variable
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 14:09:21 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 14/02/2018 2:02 PM, Adrian Matoga wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 10:57:26 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> >> See lines:
> >> - Input!IR temp = input;
> >> - input = temp;
> >>
> >>
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 17:13:28 UTC, John Gabriele
wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 20:37:24 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
There's (almost) no such thing as bad publicity...
Programming languages and operating systems have a long history
of hot advocacy... not sure how it relates to adoption, but it
affects perception.
E.g. vocal mac users gave
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 17:13:28 UTC, John Gabriele
wrote:
But even then, I don't think you should discount or put off
using std.csv as "cheating".
Yes and no. The problem with all these exercises is that they
say nothing about the language and a lot about some default
library,
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 18:55:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 19:40:12 UTC, Seb wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/7xih66/the_expressive_c17_coding_challenge_in_d
It is getting shot down…
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 20:14:41 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 19:40:12 UTC, Seb wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/7xih66/the_expressive_c17_coding_challenge_in_d
It is getting shot down…
That's implied when someone says it's
On 2018-02-14 19:00, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
For instance, Swift drags in all of Os-X on the default platform, so
writing an audio/video loader would be relatively short in comparison to
other languages. Would that be fair or instructive? Of course not. The
Os-X libraries are quite
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 18:33:33 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2018-02-14 19:00, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
For a fair comparison Swift should only use libraries that are
available both on macOS and Linux.
Are any projects using Swift outside of the Mac eco system?
Would it be more
On 14/02/2018 5:13 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 14:09:21 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
On 14/02/2018 2:02 PM, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 10:57:26 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
See lines:
- Input!IR temp = input;
-
On 2/13/2018 3:35 PM, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread today and I thought
this is an excellent opportunity to revive my blog and finally write an article
showing why I like D so much:
On Thursday, February 15, 2018 01:55:28 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 14/02/2018 5:13 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 14:09:21 rikki cattermole via
> > Digitalmars-d->
> > announce wrote:
> >> On 14/02/2018 2:02 PM, Adrian Matoga wrote:
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
