KennyTM~ wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
As an example, while I'd enjoy seeing code like this, I'm not sure
I'd enjoy writing it (Note that I am prone to exaggerations):
int a = ∅; //empty set, same as = void
int[] b = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
a = readInt();
Hum, interesting
forward.
--
Bruno Medeiros
going? (apart from Walter
and Andrei obviously)
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
garner
a few more D enthusiasts from the community. :P
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
, an interface version of the range traits?
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
improvement of DDoc.
Current DDoc doesn't keep up with D Spec(e.g. ignore @attribute, pure,
etc...).
I very much agree with this.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 27/05/2010 11:32, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:06:32 -0400, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+s...@com.gmail wrote:
On 24/05/2010 16:45, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
In the past I have built a C++ library that abstracted features of
the OS. My goal was to make it possible
.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 09/07/2010 07:30, Rory McGuire wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:49:37 +0200, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+s...@com.gmail wrote:
On 01/06/2010 18:59, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Due to a pretty odd mistake at the printer, the first 1000 copies of
TDPL will not have the name of the author
two other books :p ).
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 13/07/2010 12:13, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 09/07/2010 21:14, Rory McGuire wrote:
You got yours already? That's odd.
Hum, I checked the InformIT again, search for TDPL, and there are two
books listed, the roughs cuts, and final one. That's odd, only the
final one should appear. Do you know
reading tax
legislation or something.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 05/10/2010 13:35, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new web design is nice to have, but frankly, I think much better would
be a reorganization of the site, at least the D site. I won't go into
much detail here, but just mention that I think it has too many links,
and they are not very well organized. I
be better than the more
orthogonal object-like approach I mentioned above?
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 10/10/2010 15:23, Stephan Soller wrote:
On 07.10.2010 11:41, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 06/10/2010 15:25, Stephan Soller wrote:
On 06.10.2010 02:08, Arlo White wrote:
That's because HTML/CSS is a pretty terrible language for anything
beyond simple layouts. It shares more with Word/PDF
On 13/10/2010 17:42, Stephan Soller wrote:
On 13.10.2010 14:30, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 10/10/2010 15:23, Stephan Soller wrote:
On 07.10.2010 11:41, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 06/10/2010 15:25, Stephan Soller wrote:
On 06.10.2010 02:08, Arlo White wrote:
That's because HTML/CSS is a pretty
, but stuff
like a sidebar of any kind (the typical two or tree column layout).
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
svn add to add new files to the
sandbox. They won't get commit otherwise, right?
(note: im somewhat familiar with SVN and Git, but not with Mercurial)
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 28/10/2010 18:51, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
But isn't the staging area similar, if not identical to SVN? I mean, in
svn you also have to do a command svn add to add new files to the
sandbox. They won't get commit otherwise, right?
(note: im somewhat familiar with SVN
On 10/11/2010 10:20, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 28/10/2010 18:51, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
But isn't the staging area similar, if not identical to SVN? I mean, in
svn you also have to do a command svn add to add new files to the
sandbox. They won't
actually would hope more people would do the same, but that's a
personal ideology, so to speak.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 15/11/2010 12:27, Adrian Matoga wrote:
I wish you will be given a translation of the same quality, TDPL is
worth it.
What do you mean by this? You mean a Portuguese translation?
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 17/11/2010 21:27, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
But what exactly is that data corruption issue on Windows?
In some cases (I didn't try to isolate the precise conditions), Git
will replace '\n' with '\r\n' in binary files. This is with the
default config. It might
as
nesting is perfectly fine.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 17/11/2010 18:52, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I'm announcing the release of DDT (D Development Tools) version 0.4.0:
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/ddt/
Thanks to the people who tried it out, I really hope to progress this
IDE much further, but it's gonna take time (as one would
On 26/11/2010 22:58, Tom wrote:
El 26/11/2010 08:43, Bruno Medeiros escribió:
On 24/11/2010 21:44, Tom wrote:
El 17/11/2010 15:52, Bruno Medeiros escribió:
I'm announcing the release of DDT (D Development Tools) version 0.4.0:
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/ddt
/
, just to make sure... :P
CERN better be aware of that stuff! :D
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
.2.052.zip
Some doc typos:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/statement.html
Error also contains a pointer to the points to the original exception
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
,
Andrei
Great news! Now we need to get the ball rolling and find interested
students.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
relate to completion of imports, including issue #53.
* Fixed issue #58: typing the dot causes selected completion proposal
to be applied.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 07/09/2011 13:58, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:10:42 +0100, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 01/09/2011 08:19, Bernard Helyer wrote:
I'm seeing some serious performance problems (Eclipse typing lagging
and stuttering when working with templates and structs and big files in
general
(known and unknown ones), but at least there should
not be performance regressions (getting worse in new versions).
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
DDT 0.6.0 is out. It's been almost a year since last release,
unfortunately I haven't been able to work on it as much as I wanted in
the last months. :(
Full details here:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ddt-ide/_C7aZHX3vMM/discussion
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
...
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 18/05/2012 17:23, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2012 08:49:40 -0700, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com wrote:
DDT 0.6.0 is out. It's been almost a year since last release,
unfortunately I haven't been able to work on it as much as I wanted in
the last months. :(
Full details
On 18/05/2012 17:54, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:23 -0700, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2012 08:49:40 -0700, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com wrote:
DDT 0.6.0 is out. It's been almost a year since last release,
unfortunately I haven't been able to work
of the code being
tested), I'm not so certain it's the right call to spend so much time
writing tests...
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 24/01/2013 13:25, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-24 14:12, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
That's a lot of continuing nice work coming out from there, impressive!
BTW, something I've been meaning to ask. I see that in Mono-D you've
developed a hand-written D parser. How long did it take you
On 24/01/2013 15:11, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:12:31 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 21/01/2013 21:14, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
No, the entire formatting engine is NOT finished yet. :P
Anyway I've created a good compromise solution between releasing
stuff early
), or the package explorer to select the element. I would
much rather have the underlying elemented defined *per editor*, (and
thus independent of selection).
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 25/01/2013 13:43, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-25 13:01, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
If I was going with that approach I likely would rather port the MonoD
parser since it looks just as good, if not better, and C# would be
easier to port to Java than D.
But the descent.compiler experience
this about? DMD does not seem to recognize it, but it's
listed in the grammar. Is it an upcoming feature or is the grammar out
of date?
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 16/05/2013 17:58, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/16/2013 03:08 AM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 14/05/2013 06:45, TommiT wrote:
Notice that alias this = id is not supposed to be valid syntax.
Huh, what's this about? DMD does not seem to recognize it, but it's
listed in the grammar
and Kepler versions of Eclipse are not supported if they
contain DLTK. If you wanna use Juno/Kepler, download a package without
DLTK. Supported for the latest versions of DLTK will be added in the future.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 16/08/2013 11:12, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 20:20 +0100, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out.
The major change is the new parser which is updated to the latest
version of D, and is much more robust than the previous one.
Full changelog
On 16/08/2013 12:08, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-08-15 21:20, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out.
The major change is the new parser which is updated to the latest
version of D, and is much more robust than the previous one.
Full changelog/info here
either.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 15/08/2013 20:20, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out.
The major change is the new parser which is updated to the latest
version of D, and is much more robust than the previous one.
Full changelog/info here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ddt-ide
On 15/08/2013 20:25, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/15/13 12:20 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out.
The major change is the new parser which is updated to the latest
version of D, and is much more robust than the previous one.
Full changelog/info here
On 16/08/2013 12:08, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-08-15 21:20, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out.
The major change is the new parser which is updated to the latest
version of D, and is much more robust than the previous one.
Full changelog/info here
(and then the implementation too)
http://code.google.com/p/ddt/issues/detail?id=3can=1
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 16/08/2013 20:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/16/13 12:14 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I've updated the Features wiki with new screenshots, and revised the
text to be more clear:
http://code.google.com/p/ddt/wiki/Features
(like removing the A JDT-like project model references which actually
On 16/08/2013 20:14, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Found a bug in the meanwhile, the DDoc viewer is not rendering $(D) DDoc
macros.
Speaking of which, where does that macro come from? Seems similar to the
D_CODE macro, but it's not documented as one of the default DDoc macros,
nor could I find
On 19/08/2013 08:40, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-08-16 15:12, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Very strange! (that it completes the install, but doesn't start properly)
Let me see your configuration log, it's at:
Help About Eclipse Installation Details Configuration
And also the Error log, it's
On 16/08/2013 17:26, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 14:19 +0100, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
[…]
If you add the update site for the new Eclipse release (for example
http://download.eclipse.org/releases/kepler for Kepler) to your current
installation, and run the Check for Updates
On 19/08/2013 18:22, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 14:06 +0100, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
[…]
Hum, I guess the annoyance is proportional to the amount of extra
plugins you have. Personally I usually only have 1 or 2, the rest comes
bundled with Eclipse, but I can definitely see
On 02/09/2013 15:55, Arjan wrote:
On Thursday, 15 August 2013 at 19:20:52 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out.
Great!
But after download and install of the eclipse-kepler linux32 runtime and
adding the repo http://updates.ddt.googlecode.com/git
On 02/09/2013 16:01, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-08-17 14:49, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Someone else had a similar problem, a good guess is that you're running
with a 1.6 JVM, you need a 1.7 JVM.
I finally managed to get it to work by uninstalling Java 1.6, installing
1.7 and then trick Mac OS
flag, overriding
mine.
I'm sure there must be a better way. But I can't help you there much, I
have no expertise in Max OS X (I only use Windows, or to a lesser
degree, Linux)
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 03/09/2013 14:19, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-09-03 13:14, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I'm sure there must be a better way. But I can't help you there much, I
have no expertise in Max OS X (I only use Windows, or to a lesser
degree, Linux)
I agree, but this was the only solution that I could
:-))
I was wondering the same as well... But from the lack of answers I think
not much can be done? :/
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 16/10/2013 13:42, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 12:38:40 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 08/10/2013 14:18, Alexander Bothe wrote:
Are there any plans/tricks/hacks on how to get programs built
with dmd debuggable with gdb? Then we also could release the
addin for Windows
On 16/10/2013 22:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/16/13 5:38 AM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 08/10/2013 14:18, Alexander Bothe wrote:
Are there any plans/tricks/hacks on how to get programs built
with dmd debuggable with gdb? Then we also could release the
addin for Windows as well!
(Afaik I
On 18/10/2013 12:58, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 18 October 2013 12:43, Bruno Medeiros brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/10/2013 22:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/16/13 5:38 AM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 08/10/2013 14:18, Alexander Bothe wrote:
Are there any plans/tricks/hacks
- it doesn't use the COFF debug standard but uses DWARF data format
instead (DWARF is independent of object file formats). And that's why
MS tools don't understand that symbolic info, I guess.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
there was.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
project
configuration standard. And Dub is a good choice to go with this approach.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 15/11/2013 08:56, Alexandr Druzhinin wrote:
15.11.2013 00:54, Bruno Medeiros пишет:
DDT 0.9.0 (Debugging is Magic) is out, see post:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ddt-ide/VwA7ifYt9c0/wBcvUSVKNqMJ
I installed 4.2 version but get error again:
Cannot complete the install because
On 15/11/2013 13:29, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 11/14/13 2:54 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
DDT 0.9.0 (Debugging is Magic) is out, see post:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ddt-ide/VwA7ifYt9c0/wBcvUSVKNqMJ
Awesome. I like your solution for the debugger (instead of writing
something from scratch
On 02/12/2013 10:35, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 November 2013 at 13:15:43 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 18/11/2013 15:32, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Monday, 18 November 2013 at 15:28:36 UTC, Jacek Furmankiewicz wrote:
Quick question: with the current version is it possible to use it with
a dub
On 29/11/2013 17:01, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
A fresh DUB release is out. Apart from the usual bug fixes, there are a
few considerable changes:
Quick question: is there a way to install/fetch the dependencies of a
package, without having to build? That is, without using dub build ?
--
Bruno
On 03/12/2013 13:00, Mike Parker wrote:
On 12/3/2013 9:47 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 29/11/2013 17:01, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
A fresh DUB release is out. Apart from the usual bug fixes, there are a
few considerable changes:
Quick question: is there a way to install/fetch the dependencies
On 03/12/2013 13:44, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 03.12.2013 13:47, schrieb Bruno Medeiros:
On 29/11/2013 17:01, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
A fresh DUB release is out. Apart from the usual bug fixes, there are a
few considerable changes:
Quick question: is there a way to install/fetch the dependencies
On 06/12/2013 13:58, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 06.12.2013 13:57, schrieb Bruno Medeiros:
On 03/12/2013 13:44, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 03.12.2013 13:47, schrieb Bruno Medeiros:
On 29/11/2013 17:01, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
A fresh DUB release is out. Apart from the usual bug fixes, there are a
few
On 05/11/2013 22:08, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_i386.deb
On 28/01/2014 03:00, Sarath Kodali wrote:
On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 18:10:03 UTC, Alexander Bothe wrote:
Which OSs are supported?
Which compilers are supported, which debug info base is used?
Is the info directly extracted from the executable aka Dwarf/CV4/PDB
support?
The sample debug
On 28/01/2014 03:00, Sarath Kodali wrote:
On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 18:10:03 UTC, Alexander Bothe wrote:
Which OSs are supported?
Which compilers are supported, which debug info base is used?
Is the info directly extracted from the executable aka Dwarf/CV4/PDB
support?
The sample debug
be forced in
CDT. Thanks!
Please follow this bug: https://github.com/bruno-medeiros/DDT/issues/43
BTW, was that sample run in Linux? Using DMD?
, or just bragging rights). For a
student and future graduate, I would say that is valuable, for some
students perhaps even more than the monetary rewards.
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out.
https://github.com/bruno-medeiros/DDT/releases/tag/Release_0.10.0
The major new feature is DUB support (there are breaking changes, please
read the changelog and updated User Guide sections for more info).
A lot of the UI has been cleaned up
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out:
https://github.com/bruno-medeiros/DDT/releases/tag/Release_0.10.0
The major new feature is DUB support (there are breaking changes, please
read the changelog and updated User Guide sections for more info).
A lot of the UI has been cleaned up
On 18/03/2014 22:27, Jay Norwood wrote:
On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 15:44:24 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new version of DDT - D Development tools is out.
This has really nice source browsing... much better than the VisualD. I
end up using both because the debugging support is still better
On 24/03/2014 15:13, Casper Færgemand shortt...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is the install guide on github up to date?
Yes, all documentation should be up to date, including the installation
guide.
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
/trackers/455080-gdc
https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/283332-ldc
Andrei
I've added a bounty for GDC to produce Windows binary releases!
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1523615-build-script-and-infrastructure-to-produce-and-release-windows-binaries
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com
community (and outside it too) fully
stands behind this idea.
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
Builds?
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
is...)
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
! :)
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
On 09/05/2014 15:34, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 9 May 2014 12:20, Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 07/05/2014 17:42, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Wed, 07 May 2014 14:38:32 +0100
schrieb Bruno Medeiros bruno.do.medeiros
on the forum as well.
I agree with this.
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
On 28/05/2014 14:31, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 12:20:34 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 28/05/2014 04:54, Saurabh Das wrote:
I actually prefer the slow release of the videos - it gives me enough
time to digest each talk and discuss it before the next one grabs mine
of semantic analysis that
would typically be required? Can someone give some examples of
modifications that would be useful for such a dfix tool? (I haven't yet
had the time to watch the full panel video, if that's relevant)
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
, by
stating that static typing is really just compile time unit-tests! (it
is actually)
It didn't work, they didn't get it...
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
, and
scales way better as a general purpose language will have much more
power that selection/transformation patterns.
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
manipulations can be ok to have. But for more
complex stuff better to just use the language the parser is written in.
I'd guess most people would just be using pre-written manipulations anyways.
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
On 17/06/2014 07:25, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 16/06/14 15:43, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
What's keeping us from having such a tool? It seems that after one has a
decent parser (that also keeps tracks of the source ranges of AST
nodes), it's easy to write code that does syntactic modifications
On 17/06/2014 16:45, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Dunno about DScanner, but if it's being used in DCD, I'd guess it can
handle the whole language, or be fairly close to it.
Similarly, there is also DParser2 from MonoD and the DDT parser (for the
tool I'm working on)
And DDT is fairly complete
On 17/06/2014 16:45, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Similarly, there is also DParser2 from MonoD and the DDT parser (for the
tool I'm working on)
And the DDT parser is fairly complete, AFAIK, and well covered in tests.
There might be some syntax I have missed if I misunderstood the grammar
spec
On 17/06/2014 19:10, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 15:45:55 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Dunno about DScanner, but if it's being used in DCD, I'd guess it can
handle the whole language, or be fairly close to it.
Similarly, there is also DParser2 from MonoD and the DDT parser
On 17/06/2014 20:12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 15:45:55 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Adding final to every method in certain classes could be done
without semantic analysis. Reworking certain constructs to different
constructs possibly as well (for example change
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
