Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 1/26/14, 11:19 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 26/01/14 16:23, Dejan Lekic ha escrit:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 22/01/14 02:06, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha
On 01/27/2014 03:10 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
[...]
error: line 2: Illegal char '-' in: Version: 2.065.0-b2
-
rpm packages do not allows - on version.
I've pull-requested deb/rpm scripts to fix new dmd versioning scheme. Dash - is
replaced by tilde ~ on deb/rpm packages version, and so on
On 01/27/2014 03:10 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
[...]
error: line 2: Illegal char '-' in: Version: 2.065.0-b2
-
rpm packages do not allows - on version.
I've pull-requested deb/rpm scripts to fix new dmd versioning scheme. Dash - is
replaced by tilde ~ on deb/rpm packages version, and so on
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 13:37:07 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I'm getting deprecation warnings inside std.datetime to use
any instead of canFind.
Also DMD now warns about using FP operators, such as =, for
detecting NaN's. What's the rationale for this? One issue with
this is that isNaN
Am 27.01.2014 10:37, schrieb Don:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 13:37:07 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I'm getting deprecation warnings inside std.datetime to use any
instead of canFind.
Also DMD now warns about using FP operators, such as =, for
detecting NaN's. What's the rationale for this?
Am 22.01.2014 14:37, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
There is also a build issue that sometimes occurred at the same place in
2.064 in the form of template instantiation failures and now produces
linker errors: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/issues/458
Martin Nowak wrote in message
news:jcszzsgkwldowcmwz...@forum.dlang.org...
Mmh, we could simply upload the intermediate zip files for each platform,
that fall out of create_dmd_release before they are combined.
Any ETA on this? I'd like to provide a win32 version with dmd replaced by
ddmd
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 22/01/14 02:06, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
El 26/01/14 16:23, Dejan Lekic ha escrit:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 22/01/14 02:06, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# ==
On 1/26/14, 11:19 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 26/01/14 16:23, Dejan Lekic ha escrit:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 22/01/14 02:06, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
El 26/01/14 21:59, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/26/14, 11:19 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 26/01/14 16:23, Dejan Lekic ha escrit:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 22/01/14 02:06, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14
On 1/26/14, 3:59 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Jordi, I need you to explain this. You wrote the scripts for the pkg
installers right? What happens when you pass a version number containing
a - to dmd_rpm.sh? I'll tell you:
Building for target platforms: i386
Building for target i386
On 1/26/14, 4:20 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 26/01/14 21:59, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
Jordi, I need you to explain this. You wrote the scripts for the pkg installers right?
What happens when you pass a version number containing a - to dmd_rpm.sh?
I'll tell you:
Building for target
El 26/01/14 22:37, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/26/14, 4:20 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 26/01/14 21:59, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
Jordi, I need you to explain this. You wrote the scripts for the pkg
installers right? What happens when you pass a version number containing a
- to dmd_rpm.sh?
On Friday, 24 January 2014 at 19:58:22 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 1/24/14, 10:04 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Could you please make a 2.065.b1 tag on the GitHub as well
so we
finally start using the release naming scheme you mentioned in
the
previous beta-release thread here on the NG?
On 01/24/2014 12:24 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
The NSIS script already requires a bit of manual editing (basically just
updating the version number). I think I can probably figure out a way to
do away with that though (NSIS can pull definitions from a separate file
and the NSIS command line
On 01/23/2014 01:44 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
1) The link for nsisunz.zip per readme.txt does not work.
I wrote the author of the plugin.
He no longer has posses this file.
@Brad Anderson, maybe you or Walter still have a download laying around?
On 1/24/14, 9:17 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 01/23/2014 01:44 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
1) The link for nsisunz.zip per readme.txt does not work.
I wrote the author of the plugin.
He no longer has posses this file.
@Brad Anderson, maybe you or Walter still have a download laying around?
Could you please make a 2.065.b1 tag on the GitHub as well so
we finally start using the release naming scheme you mentioned in
the previous beta-release thread here on the NG?
On 1/24/14, 10:04 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Could you please make a 2.065.b1 tag on the GitHub as well so we
finally start using the release naming scheme you mentioned in the
previous beta-release thread here on the NG?
2.065.b1 is not going to work for FreeBSD and Debian OSes. The tags will
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 13:09:19 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
There is a fairly popular de-facto standard for versioning:
semver. Yes,
it is incompatible with Debian (and I guess FreeBSD) but you
can make
it compatible by just changing one character (- - ~).
Since apparently a
On 1/22/2014 5:37 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I'm getting deprecation warnings inside std.datetime to use any instead of
canFind.
Also DMD now warns about using FP operators, such as =, for detecting NaN's.
What's the rationale for this? One issue with this is that isNaN cannot be used
for CTFE.
On 2014-01-23 10:15, Mathias LANG wrote:
As Jacob already said, we will either need to go back to a major of 0,
or improve our major number almost everytime there is a release.
Ruby has just adopted the semantic versioning scheme[1] . They added a
fourth digit. The first digit will be the
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address
the concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention
for this and all future releases.
The following is our new naming convention:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 03:43:51 UTC, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
1) The link for nsisunz.zip per readme.txt does not work.
I wrote the author of the plugin.
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 06:50:47 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
This of course is relying on the zip file getting uploaded to
downloads.dlang.org. You could use the digitalmars urls for
betas, I suppose, since those don't end up on the download site
anyway. The url template is just a bit
Martin Nowak wrote in message
news:jcszzsgkwldowcmwz...@forum.dlang.org...
Mmh, we could simply upload the intermediate zip files for each platform,
that fall out of create_dmd_release before they are combined.
Sounds good.
Jacob Carlborg, el 23 de January a las 11:39 me escribiste:
On 2014-01-23 10:15, Mathias LANG wrote:
As Jacob already said, we will either need to go back to a major of 0,
or improve our major number almost everytime there is a release.
Ruby has just adopted the semantic versioning
On 01/23/2014 01:33 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
It would be nice, IMHO, to have release information in the same fashion
VisualD does it. Check:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/visuald/releases . Notice that
each release has changelog. -Very nice and professional I think.
Yeah, maybe we
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 03:43:51 UTC, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
On 1/21/14, 5:29 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
Let me know if you need any guidance on getting the Windows
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 13:29:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 06:50:47 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
This of course is relying on the zip file getting uploaded to
downloads.dlang.org. You could use the digitalmars urls for
betas, I suppose, since those don't end
El 24/01/14 00:24, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 13:29:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 06:50:47 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
This of course is relying on the zip file getting uploaded to
downloads.dlang.org. You could use the digitalmars
On 01/22/2014 02:37 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I'm getting deprecation warnings inside std.datetime to use any
instead of canFind.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1876
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
For a description of these packages, visit
http://dlang.org/downloads.html.
The link should be http://dlang.org/download.html (no 's' before
.html)
On 1/23/14, 7:25 PM, vitaly_m wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
For a description of these packages, visit
http://dlang.org/downloads.html.
The link should be http://dlang.org/download.html (no 's' before
.html)
Thanks
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 23:44:09 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 24/01/14 00:24, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 13:29:31 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 06:50:47 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
This of course is relying on the zip file getting
Am 23.01.2014 10:38, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 1/22/2014 5:37 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
(...)
There is also a build issue that sometimes occurred at the same place
in 2.064
in the form of template instantiation failures and now produces linker
errors:
On 2014-01-22 01:19, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Why not use semver? http://semver.org/
2.65.0-b1
2.65.0-rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
Then you would have versions number looking like this:
3.0.0
4.0.0
5.0.0
If we don't want to add a fourth digit.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
El 22/01/14 02:06, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.# == 2.065.1
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
I prefer:
2.65~b1
2.65~rc1
because 2.65.0 and 2.65 are bigger than 2.65~rc1,
regardless if qualifier number is present or not in final
release version.
I think that, as much as possible, we should use exactly the
same
On 2014-01-21 23:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.zip
I manged to open this with the zip moulde in Tango now :) The previous
beta failed.
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.dmg
The installer is old. The text contains links to D1. The content
El 22/01/14 09:31, deadalnix ha escrit:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
I prefer:
2.65~b1
2.65~rc1
because 2.65.0 and 2.65 are bigger than 2.65~rc1, regardless if
qualifier number is present or not in final release version.
I think that, as much as
On 1/22/14, 3:38 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-01-21 23:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.dmg
The installer is old. The text contains links to D1. The content seem to
be correct though. How are you building the installer.
That might be the case. I'm
Andrew Edwards, el 21 de January a las 20:06 me escribiste:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.#
On 2014-01-22 13:16, Andrew Edwards wrote:
That might be the case. I'm following the instructions here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/tree/master/osx
Last update was over 9 months ago.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/44
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-01-21 23:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address the
concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention for this and
all future releases.
I'm getting some regressions when compiling Tango. I filed one bug
report but having
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 03:34:40 UTC, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
On 1/21/14, 5:22 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
It is now added: ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.b1.exe
This of course is relying on the zip file getting uploaded to
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address the
concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention for this and
all future releases.
The following is our new naming convention:
major.minor.qualifier
Examples follow:
#.###.b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address
the concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention
for this and all future releases.
The following is our new naming convention:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
Please use the one in windows/dinstaller.nsi (I need to get some free time to
unify that with Jordi's windows installer in the linux folder).
Windows installer from Linux folder is out of the building process. The only
one windows installer is in
If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
2.65.b1
2.65.rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
--
Jordi Sayol
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.# == 2.065.1 // hotfix
On Debian, 2.065.rc1 is bigger than
Jordi Sayol, el 22 de January a las 00:16 me escribiste:
If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
2.65.b1
2.65.rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
Why not use semver? http://semver.org/
2.65.0-b1
2.65.0-rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
For Debian packages simply s/-/~/ and everything works
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:06:31 -0500, Andrew Edwards rid...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial
On 1/21/14, 5:22 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
It is now added: ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.b1.exe
On 1/21/14, 5:29 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
Let me know if you need any guidance on getting the Windows installer
working. Please use the one in windows/dinstaller.nsi (I
Andrew Edwards wrote in message news:lbmru9$290b$1...@digitalmars.com...
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.zip
While you're at it, can we get per-platform zips? Just take the normal zip
and delete all but one platform.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.arwrote:
Jordi Sayol, el 22 de January a las 00:16 me escribiste:
If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
2.65.b1
2.65.rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
Why not use semver? http://semver.org/
+1
58 matches
Mail list logo
