On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 10:13:42 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
You can slice fixed size arrays:
auto myFun()
{
float[4096] data;
auto tensor = data[].sliced(256, 16);
///use tensor
}
After playing around with some stuff more, I keep finding the
syntax for the static and
On Monday, 15 June 2015 at 08:40:31 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
Hi All,
PR and Examples:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3397
DUB http://code.dlang.org/packages/dip80-ndslice
N-dimensional slices is real world example where `static
foreach` would be useful.
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Congratulations.
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 09:17:21 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I never had issues with VisualD so far. Which version of
VisualStudio do you have installed?
64-bit compilation for DMD also works for me for VisualD, as
well as when using DUB from the VS20xx x64 Native Tools
Command Prompt
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 07:10:13 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
You're not allowed to redistribute the VS binaries, only the
libc dlls.
On Win32 we use our own libc (dmc) and linker (optlink).
We could improve our installer so it can optionally start the
VS compiler installation.
If it
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 18:58:33 UTC, Joseph Cassman wrote:
Sorry for the following rant but I am frustrated by the poor
quality of support for Windows 64 development.
rant
I understand that frustration. I had some modest problems getting
it to work with -m64 on my home computer.
On Thursday, 22 October 2015 at 23:23:50 UTC, Elie Morisse wrote:
MSVC hasn't been tested since 5 months ago. Calypso built by
MSVC compiles basic examples but last time we tried none of the
C++ standard lib test cases worked. Maybe it's better now that
the template support is more robust
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 23:39:19 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
It's not difficult to embed R inside D. I will finish a
forecasting project in early November, and will be able to
finish it up after that. That will bring R's full plotting
capabilities to D.
This sounds cool. I look forward to
On Thursday, 22 October 2015 at 03:14:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 23:40:15 UTC, Elie Morisse
wrote:
It's been a while since the last update, so here's a quick one
before making the jump to LDC 0.16.
You should write a blog post explaining what you have done so
far
On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 19:57:13 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
Unfortunately, that page is very out of date. The last
significant content update to that page was August of last
year. If I was a C++ programmer I would have fixed it by now
but no one who has the knowledge needed seems to
On Tuesday, 20 October 2015 at 12:46:51 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 19:56:15 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 15:03:52 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Saturday, 17 October 2015 at 16:31:38 UTC, DK wrote:
Hi, this link https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:17:50 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
Wha?! I thought it was John Colvin that talked about OpenCL?
Was Adam talking about it as well?!
Cheers,
A.
My first reply was originally to John Colvin, but then wobbles
refers to Adam's talk as well. I was just referring to
On Saturday, 4 July 2015 at 01:13:52 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
I've raised
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dconf.org/pull/85 to
have the dconf website point to these urls. Andrei please
consider merging once you've done unpacking all the boxes :-)
Cheers,
A.
Andy, I just watched
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:54:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Bummer, they didn't use the screen cap video I sent, so there's
no code shown or anything for quite long sections, which makes
it quite hard to follow :(
Who would be the best person to contact about this?
I was just going to
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 22:20:08 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
Hey I didn't really have an equivalent of transients in D,
it was more a general statement that there are cases where you
can still get functional purity using mutable state rather than
adhering to a strict functional approach.
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:54:50 UTC, wobbles wrote:
After the last slide in your presentation, you begin to give a
demo of the code. From then on, nothing on screen is shown :/
The stuff about OpenCL
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 11:10:16 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Rough summary of the talk I have given for recent Berlin D
meetup event:
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/08/OOP_composition_with_mixins
It seems like mixin templates can be used like alias this, but
mixin templates are more
On Monday, 31 August 2015 at 21:09:02 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
Constructive criticism is welcome.
In the "define a dynamic array" section, I often find myself
writing
int[] numbers;
numbers.length = 3;
Instead of
int[] numbers = new int[3];
I understand that this fits with the resizing section
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 04:03:48 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
https://github.com/economicmodeling/containers
The link to documentation doesn't seem to have anything on it.
On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 11:41:37 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Article:
http://nomad.so/2015/09/working-with-files-in-the-d-programming-language/
Reddit link:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3mosw7/working_with_files_in_the_d_programming_language/
Cool.
On Monday, 21 September 2015 at 19:32:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
If the compiler can prove that two pointers point to
non-overlapping memory regions then the compiler can optimize
better. This is one of the reasons why Fortran compilers
managed to do better than C for a long time.
On Monday, 21 September 2015 at 11:01:27 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
There's also a simple thing called smart pointers which do this
with RAII, copy and move semantics. Smart pointers manage the
lifetime of the object they point to automatically. You just
need to make sure that you access the
On Saturday, 2 January 2016 at 19:49:05 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
http://jackstouffer.com/blog/nd_slice.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3z6f7a/using_d_and_stdndslice_as_a_numpy_replacement/
Great piece. And great work done by those who worked on nd_slice.
On Sunday, 20 December 2015 at 02:11:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
code here:
http://arsdnet.net/dcode/minesweeper.d
[...]
The code looks easy to understand also. You might consider
writing this up into a blog post.
On Saturday, 26 December 2015 at 19:57:19 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Hi,
I will write GEMM and GEMV families of BLAS for Phobos.
Cool.
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 21:10:28 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
When you want to have control over the process of loading a
library e.g. if you want it to be an optional dependency at
runtime.
I've seen the example in the book. I'm just not sure why you
would want an optional runtime
On Sunday, 27 December 2015 at 17:21:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Thanks guys! That kind of feedback is a good Christmas present
:)
I'm working through the book now. I'm liking it.
I'm on Chapter 9, which has the Connecting D with C material. At
the beginning of the chapter you define some
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 14:06:37 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
If you think there should be any more information included in
the article, please let me know so I can add it.
I was a little confused by something in the main autodecoding
thread, so I read your article again. Unfortunately, I
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 21:33:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Should I assume some normalization occurred on the way?
I'm just looking over std.uni's section on normalization and
realizing that I had basically no idea what it is or what's going
on. The wikipedia page on unicode
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 21:31:39 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 21:21:50 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I was a little confused by something in the main autodecoding
thread, so I read your article again. Unfortunately, I don't
think my confusion is resolved. I was trying one of
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 10:45:39 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
Hi,
Here is what I've learned:
[snip]
Add to LDC Readme?
On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 at 03:48:48 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Well not much has changed since I made this announcement.
By fixing a really jarring bug I had a slight performance
regression.
But this is still the fastest SQLite reader I know of.
This project is currently on the back burner.
On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 14:09:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Not that long ago, Dan Printzell announced his D OS Kernel,
PowerNex [1], in this forum. It is now the subject of the first
project highlight on the D Blog [2].
[1] https://github.com/Vild/PowerNex
[2]
On Monday, 30 May 2016 at 19:16:50 UTC, Jason White wrote:
Note that this is still a ways off from being production-ready.
It needs some polishing. Feedback would be most appreciated
(file some issues!). I really want to make this one of the best
build systems out there.
I found the
On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 at 01:02:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for the reply.
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 11:25:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I do like the building-block idea you suggest, but one must
think about the deeper reasons for why things are owned by
which people. (I have found the Coase theorem and work on
industrial organisation to be quite stimulating
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 22:36:37 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
Longevity is an awkward one. If I create a project, do nothing
with it for four years, then make a release, will that count as
well as making a release once a month for four years? But the
other metrics should account for
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 21:08:54 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.070.0
http://dlang.org/download.html
This release comes with the new std.experimental.ndslice,
heavily expanded Windows bindings, and native exception
handling on 64-bit linux. See the changelog for more
On Monday, 29 February 2016 at 15:09:56 UTC, Seb wrote:
I have started to learn D lately and as a part of my learning
process I decided to put my insights into a new, open platform
- the D Functional Garden.
I like.
One suggestion. It can be hard to read long chains of calls. When
you do
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 21:10:45 UTC, Dave wrote:
Good starting points for a GSOC project would be "to port"
mc-stan.org or some optimization algorithms from Coin-OR.org
(please let me be more particular and independent of existing
work if there is any interest for such a project!).
On Friday, 26 February 2016 at 15:31:33 UTC, Remo wrote:
Unfortunately syntax highlighting for D still do not work even
with v6.9.
Huh? I use Notepad++ on Windows and it highlights syntax. Maybe
not as much as Sublime nor as pretty...
On Monday, 15 February 2016 at 12:11:39 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
Plotcli v0.8.0 has been largely rewritten to use ggplotd[2] as
its backend. This results in more beautiful plots and gives us
greater control over the exact plots created. Note though that
the command line arguments are
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 21:10:45 UTC, Dave wrote:
Good starting points for a GSOC project would be "to port"
mc-stan.org or some optimization algorithms from Coin-OR.org
(please let me be more particular and independent of existing
work if there is any interest for such a project!).
On Saturday, 20 February 2016 at 13:31:03 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 21:50:43 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 21:10:45 UTC, Dave wrote:
Alternately, you could try calling pystan or rstan from D. If
you make any progress on these approaches, I would
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 at 18:00:42 UTC, sigod wrote:
New syntax highlighting is not as good as I expected it to be.
I was surprised by how good it looks. I just don't have any
interest in using Sublime.
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 17:39:43 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Your choice, which is why the site should have both, so as not
to piss off the people who disagree.
Fair enough.
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 16:42:27 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the
reverse.
I disagree.
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 19:15:04 UTC, Pradeep Gowda wrote:
This is somewhat tangentially related to the announcement..
but how does one run "-vgc" switch with "dub"?
Running dmd -vgc with a project with dependencies (eg: docopt)
failed because dmd could not find the dependencies.
On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 14:21:46 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
On the roadmap are adding debhelper sequences to simplify
packaging dub-based D code in Debian based distros, auto-test
support in Debian's CI, and of course the usual bugfixing.
Is adding to Linux Mint something you would
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 22:43:05 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.071.0.
Good work.
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 20:34:07 UTC, Andrew wrote:
I wrote a program to turn the non-human-readable trace.log into
an interactive HTML file that can be used to help profile a D
program.
Cool.
On Monday, 28 March 2016 at 07:24:12 UTC, 9il wrote:
Sebastian Wilzbach (aka @greenify) starts mir.combinatorics.
Cool, when I have time I will take a look.
On Monday, 28 March 2016 at 15:30:56 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Regarding ideas:
For each range, there should probably be a numeric function
computing the length of that range. (e.g. here, binomial
corresponds to combinations, there should be factorial
corresponding to permutations etc.)
I
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 20:10:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
At this point, if anyone ever calls front with parens, they're
doing it wrong.
Is this true of all @property functions? Should this be noted in
the spec? Should it be an error? If it shouldn't be an error, is
it really such
On Thursday, 19 May 2016 at 12:10:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[snip]
Very informative, as always.
I had not realized the implication of front being called without
parens, such as front being something that isn't an @property
function (esp. variable). Are there any ranges in phobos (you
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 14:06:37 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
http://jackstouffer.com/blog/d_auto_decoding_and_you.html
Based on the recent thread in General, I wrote this blog post
that's designed to be part beginner tutorial, part objective
record of the debate over it, and finally my
On Tuesday, 10 May 2016 at 11:31:33 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Yes I do know the llvm jit, it is slow as a three legged dog.
But I do plan for a way of plugging it in. This is not a main
priority however.
What about libjit?
On Friday, 13 May 2016 at 15:24:22 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
You only *need* the slides for when you can watch the talk.
Having the slides beforehand may be confusing and unhelpful.
This means there is no reason to provide the slides until the
talk actually happens.
I almost want to
On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 23:34:46 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
Wrapper implemented here, together with documentation and tests:
https://github.com/WebDrake/dxorshift/pull/1
N.B. I'm sticking with the explicit wrapper, because I want to
be really, really certain that what comes out is
On Tuesday, 3 May 2016 at 18:15:20 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
I am reading a paper on how one could use extra information
about what was last assigned to a union in order to scan them
precisely. I haven't read the whole thing yet, but it looks
like it could be done.
Not sure if it is
On Tuesday, 3 May 2016 at 21:30:26 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 00:45:39 UTC, Nick B wrote:
[snip]
Only bit that is still decided upon is platform choice for
primary stream source - will update this topic when it gets
settled.
Any update on this ?
Can't we get some
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 02:50:08 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
I'm not sure, but one would thing that @safe code wouldn't need
any extra information about the union. I wouldn't know how to
differentiate between them though during runtime. Probably
someone with more experience with the
On Tuesday, 3 May 2016 at 16:44:32 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
I don't remember all the details, but I'm pretty sure that
Rainer, or maybe someone else, was talking about how a precise
GC is not completely possible in D because D has unions.
Discussed in this thread (among others)
On Wednesday, 3 August 2016 at 20:53:59 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Hi all,
There are two first [1] benchmarks for upcoming
ndslice.algorithm [2].
Recent LDC alpha based on LLVM 3.8 and recent Mir
v0.16.0-alpha3 are required. @fasmath syntax may be changed a
little bit and will be simplified
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 16:30:44 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
Please report your CPU (GitHub/Gist):
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz
https://gist.github.com/jmh530/2f1694711085176e007461ae8218a759
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130T CPU @ 2.90GHz
On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 09:17:14 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
You create a VD roughly twice a year. You have to compare it
with the last VD and see what was done. That is a lot of
overhead IMO.
Why not create "THE VISION DOCUMENT" and update it when needed.
I like to think about it
On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 14:01:14 UTC, Eugene wrote:
On Thursday, 7 July 2016 at 19:55:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H2 -- Andrei
please add some features from Rust: primitive type aliases,
like i8, u8, u32, and so on
Not hard:
module stdrust;
On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 14:28:20 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Daniel Nielsen put together a post describing the import idiom
that came to light in a recent forum discussion regarding DIP
1005 [3]. The relevant links are at [1] and [2].
[1]
On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 15:04:53 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
Probably, please help measuring your idea and post it here. I
intentionally chose a test made by someone else to avoid
biasing from my part. It was the only test I found at time of
writing.
The first time I did it, I got a ~60%
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 16:33:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Make extensions that others can use within their current
workflow, and they will use it. Leave it as a Dub package and
they won't touch it. You've done a lot of good work, but it's
kind of a dead end to target the standalone D
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 18:27:57 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
1. Why your company uses D?
a. D is the best
b. We like D
c. I like D and my company allowed me to use D
d. My head like D
e. Because marketing reasons
f. Because my company can be more efficient with D for some
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 08:37:29 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
DCompute is an extension to LDC capable of generating code
(with no language changes*) for NVIDIA's NVPTX for use with
CUDA, SPIRV for use with the OpenCL runtime, and of course the
host, all at the same time! It is also
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 21:48:27 UTC, Faux Amis wrote:
Nice!
Question, do you know of any (plans to make a) deep learning
framework in D? (like: http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org)
I only recall a previous discussion on this thread
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 06:18:54 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
Generic matrix-matrix multiplication is available in Mir
version 0.16.0-beta2
http://docs.mir.dlang.io/latest/mir_glas_gemm.html
It should be compiled with recent LDC beta, and -mcpu=native
flag.
Glad you are making
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 08:14:33 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
Can we rather just make a special tagged union that is
scanned... rather avoid trying to make something that should be
minimal more and more complex? The compiler already treats some
parts of phobos as "special" as far as I
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 12:22:25 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
GC (and runtime in general) has no idea what code is safe and
what code is system. GC works with data at run-time. All
@safe-related stuff is about code (not data!) and happens at
compile-time. They are completely orthogonal and
On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 17:03:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We're happy to report that the D Language Foundation is now a
public charity operating under US Internal Revenue Code Section
501(c)(3). The decision is retroactive to September 23, 2015.
This has wide-ranging implications,
On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 14:14:01 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
1. findRoot. D implementation is significantly better then 98%
of others for the problem because the problem behaves like
pathological. Thanks to ieeeMean
2. logmdigamma
3. logmdigammaInverse
Damn, I didn't even realize
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:22:02 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
I'm not sure about any special syntax which is expected for
languages which have built-in sets. It would probably be
overkill to add syntax support, but I'm not sure how often
people use set literals or not.
E.g. Python has
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Benchmark:
http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html
Great work.
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hey all,
I am proud to publish a report of my GSoC work as two extensive
blog posts, which explain non-uniform random sampling and the
mir.random.flex package (part of Mir > 0.16-beta2):
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 14:02:45 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer has contributed an article to the blog
explaining @trusted and advising on its proper usage.
Post:
https://dlang.org/blog/2016/09/28/how-to-write-trusted-code-in-d/
Reddit:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 14:44:17 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
Are you referring to ssize_t? If so, that's not a typo. It's
the signed version of size_t. The * should be next to the void,
though.
I thought you meant size_t, but glad to know that I wasn't
totally wrong.
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 19:36:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I've gone through a lot of compiler upgrades on a lot of D
projects, and in my experience, this "investigate and fix for
the new dmd" has always been trivial (aside from one instance
where Phobos's standard function
On Friday, 2 December 2016 at 18:59:08 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
Mir Random [1]
===
Glad to hear it.
Did you get contributions on the four functions mentioned in the
General forum.
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 22:12:58 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Mir GLAS v0.0.6 was released.
Very welcome. Will need to play around with it.
On Saturday, 11 March 2017 at 10:53:35 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
Github:
https://github.com/libmir/mir-algorithm
Every time I look at that mir-alogrithm main page with the Scheme
image, I'm just like what the hell is going on. Maybe you can
just link to it instead of featuring it so
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 14:07:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the first in a series of posts introducing D's garbage
collection and how it interacts with user code. This one is a
basic introduction.
Blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/03/20/dont-fear-the-reaper/
Reddit:
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 13:30:54 UTC, Szabo Bogdan wrote:
Hi!
I just made an update to my fluent assert library. This is a
library that allows you to write asserts in a BDD style.
Right now, it contains only asserts that I needed in my
projects and I promise that I will add more in the
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 16:16:03 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 07:02:19 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
Breaking, you mean the standard library? or including user
codebases?
Taking the GC out of language constructs (e.g. ~=, AAs) would
be a massive breaking change and
On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 09:19:05 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
FYI: My article with @9il "Interfacing D with C and Fortran" is
now up
http://www.active-analytics.com/blog/interface-d-with-c-fortran/
Thanks to those that made suggestions that informed the article.
You may also want to
On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 09:18:06 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
It is complete functionally with respect covering all the
functions implemented in BLAS. @9il has suggested that we
should work to merge this library with Mir GLAS which I think
is a good idea.
So Mir GLAS doesn't cover
On Friday, 14 April 2017 at 15:37:20 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
You raise a very good point. My intention is to completely
re-write each function that was based on GSL's CBLAS while
upgrading the performance. Once this is done the library should
be regarded as a different work ... if anyone
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 17:43:32 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Finally, after four betas, the third version of my D IDE [0] is
available.
Congrats. I had tried it in the past and had liked it.
On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 08:21:03 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
It seems public:
http://insidehpc.com/2017/02/john-gustafson-presents-beyond-floating-point-next-generation-computer-arithmetic/
Also in pdf here
http://web.stanford.edu/class/ee380/Abstracts/170201-slides.pdf
On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 11:23:32 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Looks good.
Also, I tried to add the blog to feedly, but it wasn't having
any of it. You might want to create an RSS feed for it.
Just an FYI, I was looking at another post
On Monday, 31 July 2017 at 13:06:44 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Hello! I am glad to announce a new command-line tool which
should make development
a little easier.
You could add a mixin template that injects the
"version(D_Coverage)" code.
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 22:46:02 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
I think I will rename 'methods' to 'openmethods' for the time
being, but the discussion remains open. Not renaming the repo
yet.
On the other hand, when I saw methods, my first thought was R's
methods, which I imagine is
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 20:41:05 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
Thinking about it, 'openmethods' would probably be a better
module/package name than just 'methods'. It emphasizes the #1
feature, i.e. polymorphism outside of classes.
Googling `multimethods` brought up more programming-related
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 21:31:20 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 20:41:05 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
Thinking about it, 'openmethods' would probably be a better
module/package name than just 'methods'. It emphasizes the #1
feature, i.e. polymorphism outside of classes.
1 - 100 of 416 matches
Mail list logo
