Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
As Wayne's often mentioned here, the advanced up-conversion design of the K3
The K3 is not an up-conversion design. With the exception that the
second IF is digital and rather low, it is more like the double
conversion amateur bands superhets that preceded the big
I did change subject to TX IMD only.
People has measured down to -24 dB. As I recall ARRL first
had a lower figure but somehow it got revised.
My own measurements show that it´s not usable above 100W.
I would keep it at 80W or lower, something seems to happen
above 80W.
No artifacts, I can hear
I use Menu a little, perhaps as much as Config, but then we are all
learning and tweaking at the moment.
Having the F/W identify which are most commonly used Config entris and
duplicate it in Menu might be nice, but would use up even more of the
memory. And you'd still need a way of removing
Jan Erik Holm wrote:
Anyway I will rest my case. I have written about this before
and I can clearly see that Elecraft ain´t interested so
why should I waist my time.
73 Jim SM2EKM
You obviously are not happy with the rig. My K3 works fine. The IMD
gets a bit worse over 100W but then
Hello,
See page 59 of the manual for installation instructions for C6. Ensure that
it is indeed soldered into the outer of the two pins
i.e. [here][ ][and here]
(if the [][][] were to represent the three pins)
Merlin
djmd wrote:
Hello Elecraft(ers)!
I just wrapped up
Since K3 #145 has had it's sub receiver the forward area of the right hand
side panel seems to get a little warmer and I've assumed this is due to the
sub rx or second dsp drawing extra through the 2 voltage regs bolted to that
panel. Shows it's all working ok since the panel is the heatsink for
For sale a new never opened K3 sub receiver module. No waiting!
Shipped to your door for $525
I can take a money order or paypal + 3%
Dave N1IX___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Jan Erik Holm wrote on Monday, January 26, 2009 8:52 AM
As you say, it´s getting rare these days with radios in the
-30 to -40 dB bracket. And we are just going to be content
with it? No not IMO.
Jan,
I agree in the context of Amateur Service radios.
The time might come perhaps sooner than
May I thank all those who replied to my enquiry for the interface, I
have had a very kind offer from Doug N6TQS to supply me with a PCB. I
always think of Elecraft and the owners of their products as a big happy
family, long may this continue.
73 de Barry G4DBS
I see that a new review of the K3 has appeared on Eham.net which will no
doubt raise the hackles of the paid-up members of the Elecraft fan club, and
cause nods of agreement from many others.
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6673
-
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222.
http://www.g4ilo.com/
Jennifer Gompf Berryman wrote:
http://sites.google.com/site/w7fgsilentkey/Home
Above is a web site that I put together for my dad. I hope it works, and
if not please let me know.
Thank you.
Ken Kopp-3 wrote:
Long-time friend Gary Gompf, W7FG became a Silent Key on
I just want to make an observationabout the USB Adapter.
This weekend, I was running about 500 watts output to my Inverted-L on 160
meters. Time after time, N1MM Logger would loose connection to the K3. I did
attribute this to RF. I stopped and made sure everything was grounded
Sorry for the previous blank message. I attempted to use Nabble private
reply with a personal note to Jennifer but Nabble posted the previous
message publicly without my comments. Caution to anyone attempting to use
Nabble for private replies...it's not working correctly!
In that message I
- Original Message -
From: Lee Buller
Any comments?
I know people who have cooked FT-2000, ProSisTel rotator controllers, Linear
Amps - you name it, they've cooked it with too much RF.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
___
One of the more amazing aspects of that review was his claim that he did not
know the size of the K-3 before he ordered it. It's size is certainly not
kept a secret. Apparently, he does not bother to read the literature before
he buys something. That's incredible.
As far as the performance
Can we expect the many others to be posting for sale notices for their
K3's on the reflector?
I doubt it.
Julian, G4ILO wrote:
I see that a new review of the K3 has appeared on Eham.net which will no
doubt raise the hackles of the paid-up members of the Elecraft fan club, and
cause nods of
Julian, G4ILO wrote:
I see that a new review of the K3 has appeared on Eham.net which will no
doubt raise the hackles of the paid-up members of the Elecraft fan club,
and cause nods of agreement from many others.
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6673
Just another appliance operator
I see that a new review of the K3 has appeared on Eham.net which will no
doubt raise the hackles of the paid-up members of the Elecraft fan club,
and
cause nods of agreement from many others.
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6673
-
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222.
I read the
Lee,
I have a similar problem. 30m rtty when I use my 80m inverted vee will lock up
the computer while in transmit. I too am well grounded but attribute it to
antenna proximity and feedline length. I have found that adding a short jumper
to the feedline will alter it relative to operating
I am happy with MY K3. I never believe anything from an anonymous
source.
It shall be filed in the round file where it belongs.
Tom
GM4FDM
Bruce McLaughlin wrote:
One of the more amazing aspects of that review was his claim that he did not
know the size of the K-3 before he
- Original Message -
From: Jim Garland 4cx2...@muohio.edu
...he correctly observes that most hams merely want a
top-performing rig that stays put in their station and that is easy to
use.
I've recommended the K3 to quite a few people, none have bought it due to
the small size.
Lee,
I usually have trouble with my DSL connection when I operate high power on
160 and 80, even though the antenna is 200 feet from the shack. I have been
attributing it to RF pickup by the long-ish phone lines and AC wiring in the
house.
This weekend, I had trouble with my amp, so I moved it
Any review for a high performance transceiver which starts off
complaining about the size of the box and the lack of enough knobs needs
to be looked at with a jaundiced eye.
I don't know where or when the idea that only BIG radios with lots of
knobs (3/4 of which never get used) should be
- Original Message -
From: R. Kevin Stover rksto...@mchsi.com
Any review for a high performance transceiver which starts off
complaining about the size of the box and the lack of enough knobs needs
to be looked at with a jaundiced eye.
Why? It's about usability...
I'm colour-blind,
Very simply put you know how big a radio is before you buy it. You look at
the specs...if its too small for you,
get something that isn't.
-
73,
Greg - AB7R
Whidbey Island WA
NA-065
On Mon Jan 26 7:17 , Simon \(HB9DRV\) sent:
- Original Message -
Bill W4ZV wrote:
I loved this comment:
THE ONLY ATTRIBUTE THAT YOU CAN COMMEND THE K3 ON IS ITS EXCELLENT
RECEIVER SPECIFICATIONS.
Is there much else that really matters?
I can't believe that you would write that, Bill. I would have thought that
transmitter specifications were
Is there a sweet spot to which one can adjust the power output for minimum
IMD, if so, how would you do it easily? I presume you would need another rx or
spectrum analyser. And I bet it changes with antenna reflections, ie from one
end of the band to the other.
I dare say a lot of K3s are
I read the review, and while QRPNEW took a few unwarranted
pot shots at the K3, I also thought he made some interesting
and valid points.
This review is either a joke or the creation of someone who doesn't
understand the purpose of a HF transceiver. It was clear, just partway
through, that
Just remember
http://www.lib.wayne.edu/services/instruction_tutorials/searchpath/mod5/images/dog.JPG
If s/he wants credibility, s/he should AT LEAST use her/his callsign.
de Doug KR2Q
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You
After using 2.57 for several months I decided to upgrade to latest
software. Started the K3 Utility, V 1.1.6.3 and had it check the website
for upgrade.
This is from the K3 Utility log:
13:31:24 K3 Utility Version 1.1.6.3
13:34:18 Opening connection to ftp.elecraft.com
13:34:18 Connected to
After using 2.57 for several months I decided to upgrade to latest
software. Started the K3 Utility, V 1.1.6.3 and had it check the website
for upgrade.
This is from the K3 Utility log:
13:31:24 K3 Utility Version 1.1.6.3
13:34:18 Opening connection to ftp.elecraft.com
13:34:18 Connected to
David Cutter wrote:
Is there a sweet spot to which one can adjust the power output for
minimum IMD, if so, how would you do it easily? I presume you would need
another rx or spectrum analyser. And I bet it changes with antenna
reflections, ie from one end of the band to the other.
I
Julian, G4ILO wrote:
Bill W4ZV wrote:
I loved this comment:
THE ONLY ATTRIBUTE THAT YOU CAN COMMEND THE K3 ON IS ITS EXCELLENT
RECEIVER SPECIFICATIONS.
Is there much else that really matters?
I can't believe that you would write that, Bill. I would have thought that
Would you write a review like that if you were going to sell the
radio? I think I'd wait until after I sold it. Pure BS.
John
k7up ___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber
Ah, a clever ruse by competitor(s).
Dave, W5UN
www.w5un.net
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
I am or was a knob guy. When contesting I liked having knobs that I could
turn if I need to do so vs. having to enter into a menu in the heat of a
contact or pileup to change something.
What I have found with the K3, I just don't feel the need to do anything
other than turn the vfo knob or
You're absolutely right. It's really odd but his criticism of the small
size of the K-3 would undoubtedly be one of the easiest things to change
should the spirit move the company. I also own an Orion II. Opening the
case of that radio is a revelation. It has lots of empty space. It is
I can remember maybe a half dozen or so for sale notices for K3's on
this list in the last year. Including HB9DRV's and the other you
mentioned. Lets call it 10 to be generous. I haven't seen many for sale
anywhere, QRZ, E-Ham, eBay, etc Add them all up from all sources
call it 100. 100
Well, got it working again so let's see what happened:
I went to website and saw where I did not have latest K3 Utility
software and it said to use this to download latest upgradeI had
simply clicked on my existing K3 Util and was surprised that the Utility
actually downloaded
Alrighty! Bear with me, this is new territory. I followed the signal through
the radio per the Cheap and Dirty tracing... cool stuff. I thought I had a
problem at C5, as the signal was a bit louder on the other end of C5 (vs.
the junction to C4) but I kept going. C228 seems to be where the buck
We are assuming he actually owns the radio. That may be unwarranted. It's
obvious from the review that he does not much like the radio. I am curious
about what is really going on.
I recently purchased a radio accessory which will remain unnamed. I should
have read some other reviews before
Tom,
I am curious how you are communicating with your K3. Are you using a
USB/serial converter? Make sure you don't have anything else in the chain of
communication, then try it again. I had a similar problem in the past. Also,
if you are use a USB converter, make sure the drivers are up to
DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL wrote:
Just remember
http://www.lib.wayne.edu/services/instruction_tutorials/searchpath/mod5/images/dog.JPG
If s/he wants credibility, s/he should AT LEAST use her/his callsign.
:-) How true! Of course there are some who are actually dogs and don't
even know
Not doubting your TX IMD report in PSK. But I typically see ~-32dB IMD when
checking PSK at 50W.
-
73,
Greg - AB7R
Whidbey Island WA
NA-065
On Mon Jan 26 7:58 , Julian, G4ILO sent:
David Cutter wrote:
Is there a sweet spot to which one can adjust the power
Bill and others, hold on and think about these
figures. -35 to -38 dB IM3 !! We are dealing
with 2SC2782 transistors operating at around
12V DC. I say no more, the knowledge and intelligent
individual will understand.
/ Jim SM2EKM
-
Bill W4ZV wrote:
I measured around -35 to
QRPNEW has posted on the K3 before and in both cases he (or she) had a long
list of complaints. I have a hard time giving any credence to people who
hide who they are and play games with reviews either to make themselves
look good or educated and just bash a product. No product is perfect and
yes
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:00:41AM -0700, Jim Garland wrote:
I see that a new review of the K3 has appeared on Eham.net which will no
doubt raise the hackles of the paid-up members of the Elecraft fan club,
and
cause nods of agreement from many others.
There is something that has been puzzling me for the last 17
years.
In November of 1991, QST reviewed the Yaesu FT-990, which
used a 13.8 vdc PA. Worst case measured 3rd order IMD
was -38 dB, 5th order was -47 dB. This measurement was at
100 watts output. The review is available on ARRL's
Gary NL7Y wrote:
I've found that with the 200Hz filter enabled in both of my receivers via
diversity reception mode, BW set to 150 or less, that weak sigs pop out of
my high S5 city noise floor like the best audio APF enabled rigs I've owned
(many). Elecraft has a Genie of sorts helping us
Actually when 10 meters opened up last Saturday I fired up my 850 for a
while on SSB. I went back to the K3. I could get much closer to signals with
the K3 without desense. I have been very happy with the K3 using the N8LP
Panadaptor. I've been able to get very close to 40 over signals with no
We'll have to assume that he DOES NOT have a call sign. I sure like that dog
attachment. Fern
- Original Message -
From: DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL doug...@gmail.com
To: Elecraft Reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 8:52 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] QRPNEW K3 review
Tom,
Use a direect serial port connection or a USB to RS232 connection and it
will pick up right where it left off.
I could not update with my old MicroKeyer either so I hooked up a USB to
RS232 and it updated the radio's firmware without a hitch.
So, take the Microkeyer out when updating
Haha!
I skipped over L25 and L26. I'll get those on there and get back to ya'll :)
Seriously though, I learned more about the circuit this morning than I have
in the whole process of the build, so I'm glad this happened.
Wow...
--
View this message in context:
eham Forums master,
There is a recent review by someone unnamed without call sign that wrote a
hurtful review of the Elecraft K3. Everyone has a right to express but I
question some one hiding behind a wall writing junk. Writing without a call
sign or name should not be allowed. Perhaps this
Maybe NL7Y is on to something here. From previous
correspondence on the reflector, 60 dB BW of the DSP = 6 dB
BW + ~300 Hz. So, if you have the DSP BW set at 150 Hz,
the -60 dB point is about 450 Hz. I can't find plots of the
200 Hz filter, but I'll bet that the effects of that filter
and the
Ron, AC7AC wrote:
I can't speak for the engineering or product decisions that went into
offering 6 meters with the K3, but for an excellent low-noise 6 meter
capability Elecraft does offer the XV50 transverter which is well integrated
into the K3 and K2 rigs offering direct frequency readout, all
David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:
I use Menu a little, perhaps as much as Config, but then we are all
learning and tweaking at the moment.
I attempted to make a distinction between operating menu entries
(MAIN) and configuration/test menu entries (CONFIG). It's possible I
didn't get this right
Terry Schieler wrote:
I posted a number of months back asking if I would be better off using
my
existing XV50 6 meter transverter with my K3 than the internal K3
receiver.
Someone from Elecraft replied that there would be no real benefit to
doing
this. Can't recall who, but it
Hi Wayne,
Good points. You had also mentioned the need for an amp if I wanted more TX
power than the XV50 provides. Another good point.
But, if I decide to keep my XV50 will you make me a black metal chassis
housing with white lettering so that it will match my K-3? :o)
Thanks and best to
Well, now I'm even more confused. I installed those toroids. I checked the
pads for connectivity, and they are ok. The signal seems to be present on
the top pad of L25 and L26, but still nothing on C226 or C227. I guess I
should remove them, re-wind them and re-strip/tin? Like I said, I checked
I was just going to tell you to check the lead tinning on L25 and L26
when I saw your note here.
Great that you found that omission.
73,
Don W3FPR
djmd wrote:
Haha!
I skipped over L25 and L26. I'll get those on there and get back to ya'll :)
Seriously though, I learned more about the
BRAVO IAN!!!
You were very clear/concise/ knowledgeable in your summation of the K3 6m.
quandry!!!
MANY THANKS!!!
Sometimes a educated explanation is better than a visceral response! :-)))
Regards,
Jim/nn6ee
S/N 2406
___
Elecraft mailing list
I too would have bought a K4 variant were it available - the K3 with a
full-sized front panel.
One future possibility is to merge K3 and TS-480 technologies to allow the
end-user the purchase of a control panel as a remote head -- and offer it in
small, medium and large sizes. The data
If you are having trouble stripping the toroid leads, that is cause to
suspect that they are the problem. If you are using the 'solder blob'
method, remember to increase the heat on the iron - at least 800 deg F
or even 850. Wait until the enamel starts to smoke a bit before moving
the lead
Don't load K3 firmware through a microHAM device (actually the microHAM
router). It just doesn't work reliably.
Dick, K6KR
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of TMorton
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 7:57 AM
To:
- Original Message -
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett w...@w0mu.com
I own two FT-2000's and they do look cool and work fine but they don't
work
as well as the K3.
FT-2000 has a nice UI - a big shame the performance of the receiver isn't so
good. I think it was due to cost-cutting, not
- Original Message -
From: Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net
One future possibility is to merge K3 and TS-480 technologies to allow the
end-user the purchase of a control panel as a remote head -- and offer it
in
small, medium and large sizes.
I agree 100% - when I first saw the
It occurred to me also that this anonymous review may have been posted by a
competitor...
I don't do much SSB operating on my K3, but I was struck by the comments
about splatter on SSB. Given the comments about ALC, this suggests to me
that the guy doesn't know how to drive an amplifier. Most
Another thing you might try is to change the microHAM router so that the
radio type is None.
This is discussed (briefly) in the K3 Utility Help, Troubleshooting section
under USB to Serial Adapter Troubleshooting. It's the last item on that
page.
The microHAM router acts as if it's talking to a
Gregory Fischer wrote:
Not doubting your TX IMD report in PSK. But I typically see ~-32dB IMD
when
checking PSK at 50W.
You are probably right to doubt it. Such a difference made me try a test
again, on a different band. I got a different set of results. Probably it is
better to use a
Bruce McLaughlin wrote:
We are assuming he actually owns the radio. That may be unwarranted. It's
obvious from the review that he does not much like the radio. I am curious
about what is really going on.
It looks to me as though the guy looked through the reflector archives, picked
out
I just looked and there is a pep upgrade on the 2000's now and updates for
the dmu.
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Simon (HB9DRV)
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:54 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
-Original Message-
It occurred to me also that this anonymous review may have been posted
by a competitor...
73, Dick WC1M
--
I'm more inclined to think it was posted by a competitor's fan boy. I
don't see TenTec doing anything like this, and I don't see why
My grandfather owned a swine three drifty. I disposed of it quite some time
ago. Yikes!
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Darwin, Keith
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 11:29 AM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject:
Hi,
On the off chance, does anyone have a 250Hz or 1.8kKz filter that they
think is just a bit tight, and want to swap for a 400Hz or 2.1kHz,
respectively? I would consider adding something to boot on my end.
73, doug
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post
We are very sorry to have to forward the following SK report about G3JAG...
Original Message
Subject:G3JAG
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:51:51 +
Information:
John Crux (G3JAG) passed away very suddenly, early on Friday morning,
thought to be
Gary NL7Y wrote:
I've found that with the 200Hz filter enabled in both of my receivers via
diversity reception mode, BW set to 150 or less, that weak sigs pop out of
my high S5 city noise floor like the best audio APF enabled rigs I've
owned
(many). Elecraft has a Genie of sorts helping
Brian wrote:
We are very sorry to have to forward the following SK report about
G3JAG...
Original Message
Subject: G3JAG
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:51:51 +
Information:
John Crux (G3JAG) passed away very suddenly, early on Friday
W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
My grandfather owned a swine three drifty. I disposed of it quite some time
ago. Yikes!
LoL Swine Three Drifty :))) Love it...
73 , Deni
F5VJC
K3# 325 I really love it...
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
I never believe anything from an anonymous
source.
(((He has posted here in the last few dayslook back you will see it))
My view is different than his but he does have a right to his opinion.
I sure don't buy or discount a rig from an EHAM review.
Jim
KE4WY
-Original
I posted this some time ago. I have a problem on digital modes with very
low initial power output when I do one of these:
a) switch on
b) change mode
c) change band
d) change power level
There's been a development since then - if I hit the TUNE button, the
power goes up to the set level (as
I have read the comments on the QRPNEW review and while I support
someone's right to disagree with what I find true, I believe in
accountability. That anonymous postings on a review site I use to
gather information prior to purchasing is allowed to occur is most
disturbing and cheapens the
That would be a very good arguement for qrpwouldn't it?
I have yet to cook anything with my K2, and I used to run a full ... no.. a
full kw, on each band,
160 through 10... but cooked lots of things..
NOT with the K2 at 5 watts ... or less... yet the fun meter is higher..
and antennas are
Yeah, that was more or less it. I remembered that when I did the KX1 I used a
much bigger tip on the iron, so I switched to that and it worked just like I
remembered. So now I am definitely hearing the outside world loud and clear.
However, this has brought to attention a couple new problems.
I made some A/B testing in CQ160 last weekend, between K2 and TS-850S. They
hear pretty good the same but it's much easier to copy week signals with K2 if
you have S9+ signal close to you.
I suppose that K3 is even better...
Samir, 7S7V
Message: 29
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:55:52 -0500
The first thing you should do when you get back to it Thursday is to put
the bottom cover on (using all 6 screws) if it is not already mounted,
and then run CAL PLL. That should set your tuning straight. Right now
it would appear that you have random data in the EEPROM, and a CAL PLL
run
I am selling of some of the station and need to sell K2/100 #4841.
Rig is in excellent condition and I am a non-smoker.
Rig comes with power cable, KIO2, 160M, KDSP2, SSB and finger dimple tuning
dial.
Also included is the nifty little manual, and original owners manual. Kenwood
hand mic
Every microHAM manual cautions against attempting to load
firmware to a transceiver through Router and any of the
microHAM interface hardware. The K3 is no different.
In some cases, firmware can be uploaded if the K3 and Router
are already communicating and Router is set to Disable router
2.80 available..
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
David,
Sorry for being slow to reply.
You wrote:
Is there a sweet spot to which one can adjust the power output for
minimum IMD,
In general terms the short answer is that there might be. If the two tone
signal driving an amplifier under test is very 'clean' in terms of odd order
IMD
One factor that affects IMD is power supply voltage variation under
load. The standard PS cable that comes with the K3 drops several tenths
of a volt at max power. Add that to power supply regulation and
internal voltage drop in the K.
On my unit, the voltage reading on the K3 display goes from
Unfortunately neither the Toshiba or ASI datasheets for the
2SC2782 used in the KPA3 provide any IMD specifications.
Unlike the information available for the 2SC2879.
The 2SC2879 has a distinct sweet spot at 60 Watts output
with 12.5V and 100 mA idle current. A push pull pair of
2SC2879
Jan Erik Holm wrote:
Bill and others, hold on and think about these
figures. -35 to -38 dB IM3 !! We are dealing
with 2SC2782 transistors operating at around
12V DC. I say no more, the knowledge and intelligent
individual will understand.
Which reminds me...I set my power supply to
THanks for the info Wayne. I might have a feeling about that later,
but right now, I don't think I've used it enough (even after a year)
to warrant the work. But I'll start taking note of the things I go to
CONFIG more often for.
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174
--
Math Anxiety: an intense lifelong
I thought I saw the response that he got the firmware upgrade fixed by using
the new K3 Utility. He had not upgraded the K3 Utility. I have the MKII
and am curious if it works successfully. The last upgrade I did, I was at a
friend's station, and he used a serial cable to the firmware upload.
OMG Eric has not yet killed this thread - Oh what luck
Wait - wait - I'll be back in just a minute with something to fix this
electronic injustice alltogether.
Or my post will be mis-read and it will be like tossing petrol on a fire.
I -hate- it when that happens. ;-)
[Elecraft] New
Some eHam regulars have been trying to get that done for YEARS.
The attempts have always fallen on deaf ears. As long as your a member,
anonymous (no call sign) or not you can post a review.
I automatically discount/ignore reviews there from anonymous reviewers
and those who haven't used the
K3 beta-test firmware revision 2.80 (with DSP rev 1.99) is now
available. See release notes below.
Please send any problem reports to k3supp...@elecraft.com. For
instructions on how to load beta firmware, please see:
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/k3_software.htm
We also recommend that you
Just downloaded the latest K3 Beta firmware update (MCU 2.80 / DSP 1.99,
January 25, 2009)
A big thank you to Wayne/Eric et all for changing the CWT function:
CWT (CW TUNING AID) ON/OFF STATE SAVED: If you turn CWT on, it will
always turn on when you return to the applicable mode (e.g. CW).
The
wayne burdick wrote:
I attempted to make a distinction between operating menu entries
(MAIN) and configuration/test menu entries (CONFIG). It's possible I
didn't get this right in some cases, in hindsight. But I have noticed
that as the firmware and options near completion, the
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
