Only require mfr/importer name and address apart from trade mark. Do we need
EU AR too?
Rgds,
Scott
From: Dan Roman <0d75e04ed751-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2019 10:28 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Postal address on product l
I believe that is reason why the directives lay down clear obligations of each
economic operator. They are not allowed to determine by themselves.
Rgds,
Scott
From: Nyffenegger, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2019 10:51 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Postal ad
Great, thanks, John!
Scott
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Monday, 4 March 2019 09:05 PM
To: Scott Xe ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS standard change...
Maybe my explanation was a bit too brief. CENELEC specifies the dow, but the
Commission can assert a different date
Hi John,
Thanks for your clarification! A lot of people will take the dow in EN
standard as the deadline, especially the standard has not been put in OJEU
or conflicts with OJEU. EN standard is EN Norm. What is wrong to take this
approach? Is there any official guidance to clarify it?
R
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your comments! Your second point is good to think it deeper.
Who does determine the battery lifetime equal to product lifetime? Product
designer? Not all customers agree on it. For example, the lithium-ion
battery in mobile phone. Nowadays, many mobile phones do not sug
wrote:
> Scott --
>
>
> Don't forget that the Battery Directive requires that you provide
> customers with instructions on how to remove the battery at the end of life.
>
>
> Mike Sherman
>
> Graco Inc.
>
> On February 20, 2019 at 11:06 AM Scott Xe wrote:
>
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
> Rayleigh, Essex UK
>
> On 2019-02-20 17:06, Scott Xe wrote:
>
> The end product safety standards EN 60065 & EN 60950-1 consider the
> compliance if lithium-ion rechargeable battery meets EN 62133. EN 62133
> asks for some rating
The end product safety standards EN 60065 & EN 60950-1 consider the
compliance if lithium-ion rechargeable battery meets EN 62133. EN 62133
asks for some rating markings and WEEE and battery Directives also ask for
recycle symbols. For individual selling on battery cells and packs, they
must comp
purchase
contract relationship.
Regards,
Scott
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2019 04:06 PM
To: Scott Xe; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [BULK] [PSES] Economical operator name & postal
addressonEEEproducts
I think the setting up of EU 'pres
e access to all the manufacturing data for the product.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-02-05 09:44, Scott Xe wrote:
Dear Brian,
Thanks for your useful info! Must the responsible person be in EU/EEA
countries?
I fully agree on the Ken's concern. How can the manufactures change the
logos and relevant documents of the goods arrive in the UK post Brexit of
30/03/2019? UK will suffer short of goods in next few months. Does UK
plan to cope with it?
Regards,
Scott
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 01:51, Kapur, Ken
implementation of the EU products rules 2016/C
272/01 (unless there is a newer version). It does a good job explaining the
many possible roles and players under the New Legislative Form.
The Other Brian
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2019 3:19 AM
To: EMC-PSTC
Regarding the name & address on EEE products in EU market, should they be the
manufacturers, importers or authorized representatives and which regulation
does call for it?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
This message is from the IEE
er
> with its supply voltage and current ratings, people here may be able to
> help you with ways to make it comply.
>
> Best wishes
> John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
> J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
> Rayleigh, Essex UK
>
> On 2019-01-28 14:50, Scott Xe w
We have a portable air conditioner that failed to meet EN 61000-3-3 but met
with EN 61000-3-11 with conditional connection. The compliance conclusion
is included a statement that "The appliance can be connected only to a
supply with system impedance no more than 0.4 ohms. In case necessary,
pleas
Dear Charlie & Ian,
May I add some additional comments on the following.
Regards,
Scott
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Charlie Blackham
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2019 09:42 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Brexit requirements for UK manufacturers.
Ian
My understan
Hi Ian,
Your assumption is correct but may have more than your thought. You can read
the following draft for greater detail.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2019/978076368/schedule/25
I have learnt that recently the UK government published draft Regulations of
619 pages in case of no
Brexit is coming soon. If the EU representative is now located in the UK, must
it move to a EU member state after Brexit regardless of a deal or not to
maintain the continued CE compliance?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
Thi
Hi Ted,
Many thanks for your sharing the anecdote! I am also aware of a case on
mains cord sets. It happened in 2014, 9 years after your case. Two major
PC suppliers: Hx and Lenxxx recalled abt 7m mains cord sets globally
(details are in CPSC website). It sounds not much lesson learnt. Nation
Many thanks for your good materials related long term safety issue. I also
found below materials from Japan. It is quite conclusive to the one from
Adam.
http://www.fujitsu.com/jp/group/fql/services/product-quality/analysis/advantage/red-phosphorus/
Note: You may open this web page from Google
Happy New Year in 2019!
Although brominated flame retardants used in plastic are commonly replaced by
red phosphorus flame retardants due to environmental saving, Red-P may result
in possible reliability of overheating/catch fire under high humidity and
temperature. It is learnt that lots of b
ressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.
From: Scott Xe
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:54 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Glow wire tests
I notice in safety test standards that the plastic enclosure is required to
pass glow wire test.
s.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ted Eckert
>
> Microsoft Corporation
>
>
>
> The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of
> my employer.
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 27, 2018 12:40 AM
> *To:* Ted Eckert
hes for the holiday season,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 27, 2018 1:04 AM
> *To:* ri...@ieee.org
> *Cc:* EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] Glow wire tests
>
>
>
> Dear Rich,
>
>
>
> Thanks for interes
; file:///C:/Users/richn/Downloads/Brandschutztechnische_Pruefverfahren_en-.pdf
>
>
>
> http://www.glow-wire-testing.com/60695-2-10/
>
>
>
>
> http://mminswall.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/01-Growing-Test-Fire-Hazard-Testing-Eng.pdf
>
>
>
> These shoul
gt;
> Microsoft Corporation
>
>
>
> The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of
> my employer.
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:54 AM
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Subject:* [PSES] Glow wire
I notice in safety test standards that the plastic enclosure is required to
pass glow wire test. What does this test for? There are commonly two
conditions: 550 or 750 degC. What are the differences and what does each
represent its capabilities? I am new to this requirement and appreciate
your
; products which incorporate them* explicitly into scope, and require
> manufacturers to post information on public access websites.
>
>
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
>
> -Lauren Crane
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 18, 2018 12:04 PM
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTS
d to follow specific products types of
> concern to find out what the likely schedule will be. I am not aware of an
> overall schedule for all products.
>
>
>
> Ted Eckert
>
> Microsoft Corporation
>
>
>
> The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily
In order to support this new energy labelling regulation, the corresponding
delegated regulations and ecodesign regulation for each EuP will be published.
The first 3 EuPs said to be refrigerating appliances, washing machines and
dishwashers. Where can we find the draft regulations and the roa
Hi Amund,
Under your scenario, the AC/DC adapter is just an external power supply of your
main unit. Your product is operating on safe level of DC. If you don’t sell
the adapter together with the main unit, you may avoid declaring it in your DoC.
If you have to sell your product together with
Hi James,
It is quite normal attitude for an oem or odm manufacturer. They have over
hundred buyers to keep their business alive and lack of resource to meet
all standards of their buyers. In order to meet your requirements, you
have to actively educate them for what they have to supply in order
, Scott Douglas wrote:
> Many years ago a TUV Engineer drummed into my head "the only acceptable
> way" to make protective earth bonds was chassis > star > ring lug > star >
> nut for ground studs pressed into the chassis.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 201
will cut through the paint and establish a gas-tight connection. There is
> no need to remove paint.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe
> *Sent:* Friday, August 10, 2018 9:54 AM
> *To:* ri...@ieee.org
Hi Rich,
Thanks for your advice! 😊 Regarding the flat washer, can it be the flat ring
lug of the connecting wire instead?
Between the screw head and the metal enclosure, do we need a flat washer? That
is to say: screw head -> flat washer -> metal enclosure -> on other side of
metal enclosure
Hi Doug,
Very interesting about oxygen free connection for long term reliability!
Thanks and regards,
Scott
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 01:03, Doug Powell wrote:
> I have used IPC guidance in the past and while they have many good things
> to say, the primary aim is for reliability. Product safety
Hi Dave,
It is new to me about this requirement.
Thanks,
Scott
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 01:39, Nyffenegger, Dave
wrote:
> Also keep in mind the NSF standards generally prohibit the use of external
> tooth star washers in food zones in food certified products.
>
> -Dave
>
>
>
> *From:* Doug Powe
Hi Ted,
Thanks for your reference! I downloaded the 1st doc document successfully
but failed to reach the 2nd document. Can you do me a favor sending a copy
to me.
Thanks and regards,
Scott
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 03:00, Ted Eckert <
07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> wrote:
> These refe
It really happens in white goods. They want to streamline the process
using toothed star washer. I fully agree your point and will read the
reference book later to understand it in greater detail. IPC is generally
for normal electronic assembly and did not remember any reference for
earthing con
ch must be double-sided so that it doesn't matter which way up
> it is installed.
>
> John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
> J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
> Rayleigh, Essex UK
>
> On 2018-08-08 14:21, Scott Xe wrote:
>
> Notice that it is common to use extern
Notice that it is common to use external toothed star washer to cut through
the paint on metal enclosure instead of removing the paint for earthing.
The connection effectiveness may be affected with following things
- Sharpness of teeth on washer (some toothed washers are single sided
instea
ible to avoid
> but luckily also occur very rarely.
>
> John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
> J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
> Rayleigh, Essex UK
>
> On 2018-07-17 10:58, Scott Xe wrote:
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> Thanks for your view! Firstly I dare to say it is n
gt; some of the efforts.
>
>
>
> So much philosophizing; good luck in fixing the world.
>
>
>
> :>) br, Pete
>
>
>
> Peter E Perkins, PE
>
> Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
>
> PO Box 23427
lugs being able to be inserted upside down in some
extension sockets.
John McAuley
From: Scott Xe
Sent: 15 July 2018 23:32
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety design of shutter opening
Thank you for the clarification.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, 12:47 am Joh
ell as GPSD.
>
> BS 136X connectors are used outside the UK; the EU is not relevant to
> that.
>
> John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
> J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
> Rayleigh, Essex UK
>
> On 2018-07-15 17:33, Scott Xe wrote:
>
> The product is for UK
design if it meets
the standard.
According to LVD guidance, this type of product falls into LVD, not GPS. John,
how does this product relate to GPS?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
From: John Woodgate
Date: Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 10:53 PM
To: Scott Xe ,
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety design
>
> I received a sample of portable extension sockets with a compliance
> certificate of BS 1363-2. It is noted the slim enclosure design allows the
> mains plugs to be inserted into the sockets up-side-down by mistake. In
> such circumstance, only the earth pin is inserted and the plug opens the
> Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
>
>
>
> 503/452-1201
>
>
>
> IEEE Life Fellow
>
> p.perk...@ieee.org
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 21, 2018 8:58 AM
> *To:* Pete Perkins
> *Cc:* EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
>
> *Subject:* Re
ultants Ltd*
>
> *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*
>
> *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com*
> <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>
>
> Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
>
>
>
Gert,
Note 55032 has replaced 55022 in EMC HS but not in RED. Suppose 55035 and
55032 are a pair of EMS and EMI for MME. Any particular reason?
Regards,
Scott
On 22 June 2018 at 21:03, Gert Gremmen wrote:
> It IS far behind. This step was made just to stop the delay.
>
> Virtually all stan
t; changes coming to the market.
>
> Independent Expert on CE marking
> Harmonised Standards (HAS-) Consultant @ European Commission for RED and EMC
> EMC Consultant
> Electrical Safety Consultant
>
>
>
>
> On 22-6-2018 12:54, Scott Xe wrote:
>
> Hi Charlie, I am no
ultants Ltd*
>
> *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*
>
> *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com*
> <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>
>
> Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
>
>
s
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
>
>
> *Charlie Blackham*
>
> *Sulis Consultants Ltd*
>
> *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*
>
> *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com*
> <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2
PO Box 23427
>
> Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
>
>
>
> 503/452-1201
>
>
>
> IEEE Life Fellow
>
> p.perk...@ieee.org
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 21, 2018 7:25 AM
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES]
>
> *Charlie Blackham*
>
> *Sulis Consultants Ltd*
>
> *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*
>
> *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com*
> <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>
>
> Registered in
7 or Q1 2018
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
> *Charlie Blackham*
>
> *Sulis Consultants Ltd*
>
> *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*
>
> *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com*
> <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&
Dear All,
We have a DAB radio with BT speaker. It held NB a cert using EN 55032 :
2015, EN 55020 : 2007 + A12 : 2016, …. for EMC part compliance last
year. Currently we are reviewing the continual compliance. It is
discovered that both EN 55032 and EN 55020 disappears in the latest list of
EM
require
Finnish and Swedish.
Best regards,
Scott Xe
From: John Woodgate
Date: Sunday, 25 March 2018 at 1:12 AM
To: Scott Xe ,
Subject: Re: [PSES] Time-limits for transposition into national law
This is actually legally problematic. The UK government originally considered
that a
Directive is not
valid yet. What is the basis of the market surveillance to do their routine
check on products in the market?
For EU regulation, there is no above issue. The EU regulation is the law of
all member states, isn’t it?
Thanks and regards,
Scott Xe
safety standards.
Regards,
Scott
From: John Woodgate
Date: Monday, 19 February 2018 at 4:22 PM
To: Scott Xe ,
Subject: Re: [PSES] Insulation resistance test
The test is very old, and pre-dates the high-voltage test by very many years.
You mentioned 'Megger' in your other
Thanks for your sharing experience! Did you conduct the flash test that
normally is over 1,250 Vac by that time? Probably a megger tester is more
portable for onsite testing than flash test as an alternative.
Scott
From:
Date: Monday, 19 February 2018 at 2:50 PM
To: 'Sco
Insulation resistance test is one of most common safety tests nowadays: Flash
test, earth continuity test, leakage current test and insulation resistance
test. Can someone share the history of this teat to use DC and 500 V. The
products are working on AC and test voltage is higher than normal
Hi John,
It is a very useful document and thanks for your sharing! It gives a good
summary and remind the last implementation date of 31 Aug 2019.
Thanks and regards,
Scott
On 30 January 2018 at 20:42, John Allen <
09cc677f395b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> wrote:
> Good afternoon.
>
>
>
> Just
protected
from the health safety hazard?
Thanks and regards,
Scott Xe
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All
Scott,
LVD is not applicable to the cable due to low operating voltage but RoHS
requires to be marked CE as the compliance.
Regards,
Scott
On 5 January 2018 at 08:00, Scott Douglas wrote:
>
> I am going around with an ODM making a HDMI cable for us. Standard cable
> just has our brand logo mo
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
>
> PO Box 23427
>
> Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
>
>
>
> 503/452-1201 <(503)%20452-1201>
>
>
>
> p.perk...@ieee.org
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursda
h other.
>
>
>
> Ted Eckert
>
> Microsoft
>
>
>
> The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of
> my employer.
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:26 AM
> *To:* E
Hi Brian,
Will look for the stds for understanding the meaning. It is interesting
that an enamel coating is not necessarily considered insulation. If enamel
coating is not necessarily considered insulation, the coil inductance, Q
factor, energy dissipation, etc. will be affected. How does the c
K
>
> On 2018-01-03 15:33, Scott Xe wrote:
>
> What are the maximum temperature and permissible operating temperature for
> this insulated wire?
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
>
>
> Scott
> -
>
&g
What are the maximum temperature and permissible operating temperature for this
insulated wire?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post
ces used to rent, where I used to work, we purchased one used,
> but that was 15+ years ago so I don’t recall the price, perhaps $800 -$1000?
>
> Kevin
> ------
> *From:* Scott Xe
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 20, 2017 9:18:45 AM
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTS
odgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2017-12-19 16:12, Scott Xe wrote:
I will be conducting the temp rise measurements on windings of AC motors for
electrical appliances such as washing machines, dishwashers, etc. It said the
thermal couple method is commonly adopted
I will be conducting the temp rise measurements on windings of AC motors for
electrical appliances such as washing machines, dishwashers, etc. It said the
thermal couple method is commonly adopted for safety assessment. I can
dismantle the windings and place the couples inside the windings usi
special plug and socket connection other than normal
household plugs and sockets thanks to an isolation transformer!
Regards,
Scott
From: John Woodgate
Date: Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 10:10 PM
To: Scott Xe ,
Subject: Re: [PSES] Plugs & sockets in bathrooms of EU
See Section 70
I notice most of electrical appliances such as exhaust fans, watch heaters,
hairdryers, etc., in bathroom are equipped with fixed connections rather than
plug & socket systems except shaver sockets. In modern families, electric
tooth brushes and electric hair shavers for female are becoming pop
harmonised standard committees, consultant firms or accredited test
laboratories in terms of the knowledge and experience in the special
disciplines.
Regards,
Scott
From: Charlie Blackham
Date: Tuesday, 31 October 2017 at 3:06 AM
To: Scott Xe , "EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG"
Hi Charlie,
Is there any condition for that a manufacturer is free to choose any standards
for demonstrating compliance with article 3(1), safety and EMC. The knowledge
and experience of each manufacturer vary markedly. I am at loss on what basis,
how can EU allow the manufacturer to choos
Hi James,
Below are my inline comments!
Regards,
Scott
From: "James Pawson (U3C)"
Reply-To: "James Pawson (U3C)"
Date: Monday, 23 October 2017 at 11:21 PM
To:
Subject: [PSES] BS-1363 UK Plugs - non recognised BSI Kitemark numbers
Hi folks,
My understanding is that three p
I notice that the cl 30.2 resistance to ignition and spread of fire is not
applied to any exposed polyurethane foam insulation. Is there any particular
reasons for the exemption?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
This message i
Hi Amund,
That is a marking requirement for air shipment. Besides that, your battery
must have an UN 38.3 Transport of dangerous goods compliance report issued by
specific test houses accepted by airlines.
For sea shipment, you have to get another test report for shipping companies.
Th
Following the 1st Guide for RED, a doc of FAQs was published in August to help
answer some of common questions. The link below is for your download of the
doc.https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/24921/attachments/1/translations/Rgds,Scott
-
---
Hi Matthew,
As you mentioned domestic plugs are covered under GPSD, how can I find the
standard (BS 1363 for UK) under the HS of GPSD?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
Hi Matthew,
You are correct the mains plug should comply with the applicable
requirements of The Plug & Sockets etc Regulations 1994
Hi Matthew,
You are correct the mains plug should comply with the applicable
requirements of The Plug & Sockets etc Regulations 1994 for UK market.
However cord set and extension cord do not fall into The Plug & Sockets etc
Regulations 1994 but LVD as per the LVD guidelines. It is interesting the
t.
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
Beware averages! They hide or discard data, and may distort it (them?).
-Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
d Wales, number 05466247
-Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 August 2017 16:40
To: Charlie Blackham ;
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE Mark
Hi Charlie,
“The product should be CE marked to the RED - a
-Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 August 2017 15:51
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE Mark
If a product is restricted (due to restrictions on putting into service in
geographical area) to be used in so
est wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
Beware averages! They hide or discard data, and may distort it (them?).
-Original Message-----
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 Augu
The CE Mark is a conformity scheme that allows for the free flow of products
between countries in the European Economic Area (EEA). If a product has below
restriction in RED in some member countries, can the product be affixed a CE
Mark?
Same as a UK plug fitted, the product should be used in
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your notification and useful summary!
Regards,
Scott
On 26/7/2017, 3:22 PM, "Michael Loerzer" wrote:
Hi,
the Commission has published the
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/1354 of 20 July 2017 specifying
how to present the informat
& Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
p.perk...@ieee.org
-Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 9:25 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subje
Dear John,
Thanks for your additional view!
Actually, IEC amendment 2 of 60335-2-24 consists of not only the incombustible
material for back panel. It also has other measures to address the fire risk.
In addition, metal back is not a mandatory requirement in both IEC and UL
standards althoug
ldt
(207) 893-0352
(207) 838-4026 Cellular
(800) 893-8142 Facsimile
At 10:15 (-) on 17.07.22, Scott Xe wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> Appreciate your detail explanation! You are very experience in
> this area! Absolutely important, we mu
eden, it's on him to ask you what is special about
Sweden.
Regards,
Chuck Seyboldt
(207) 893-0352
(207) 838-4026 Cellular
(800) 893-8142 Facsimile
At 09:24 (-0000) on 17.07.22, Scott Xe wrote:
> Dear Chuck,
>
> What is e
e unhappy. The
ramifications of this are highly variable. Lawsuits over this
type of subject are common.
Regards,
Chuck Seyboldt
(207) 893-0352
(207) 838-4026 Cellular
(800) 893-8142 Facsimile
At 07:49 (-) on 17.07.22, Scott Xe wrote:
il: sloz...@ieee.org
-Original Message-----
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:54 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
Dear John,
It is a good point to note!
efer to that part as needed.
That way, if the report is amended to reflect a revised design,
there is less risk of having inconsistent observations recorded
in the report.
Regards,
Chuck Seyboldt
(207) 893-0352
(207) 838-4026 Cellular
(800) 893-8142 Fac
-----Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 July 2017 09:13
To: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
Hi John,
I notice the CB reports that they will conduct the test according to IEC
standard and the
Hi Chuck,
If we have to look after the additional concern in safety compliance, ie. fire
risk for this case, should we put the compliance standard under the risk
assessment of LVD or the applicable standards under LVD?
Regards,
Scott
On 22/7/2017, 10:31 AM, "Scott Xe" wrote:
gh England
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 July 2017 18:01
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Harmonised standard withdrawn [60335-2-24]
Hi Chuck,
Appreciate
(800) 893-8142 Facsimile
At 13:00 (-) on 17.07.21, Scott Xe wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> Appreciate your good advice!
>
> In other directive, such as RED, if harmonised standard is not
> available, relevant national or international standard can b
101 - 200 of 550 matches
Mail list logo
