On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi
In preparation for the coming weimar-type economy collapse,
where a loaf of bread will cost you $100 or more,
I'm going up to Germantown to buy Auguson Farms
emergency food pails at walmart. The 30 day pails of
On 12 Dec 2013, at 22:10, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/12/2013 12:57 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Dec 12, 2013, at 11:00 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/12/2013 1:36 AM, LizR wrote:
On 12 December 2013 17:00, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Liz,
In forking MWI worlds,
On 12 Dec 2013, at 22:17, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Bruno: Please tell me if above helped.
Richard: Yes. Very much so. We being celestial, divine creatures,
if you want. We (first person) are already in heaven, or
Platonia, is completely consistent with my thinking
OK.
Bruno: To get
On 12 Dec 2013, at 22:27, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
In Everett it's always obvious who I'm talking about when I use
the personal pronoun you, it's the only other fellow in the room
with me; but in Bruno's thought
On 12 Dec 2013, at 22:30, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Bruno: If our subst level is far above the quantum level, then QM
can still be derivable from arithmetic, but some constants can be
geographical (and thus variable in the whole of the physical reality).
Richard: Astronomical
On 12 Dec 2013, at 22:45, Jason Resch wrote:
Any time John Clark pretends that he does not understand or believe
in first-person indeterminancy, refer him to his own post where he
admitts to understanding it and believing in it:
On 12 Dec 2013, at 23:58, LizR wrote:
On 13 December 2013 10:27, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
In Everett it's always obvious who I'm talking about when I use
the personal pronoun you, it's the only other
On 13 Dec 2013, at 00:51, LizR wrote:
On 13 December 2013 07:04, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Dec 2013, at 18:31, meekerdb wrote:
Is it true that you're transferring to the University of Uruguay,
Bruno?
Yes, but not exactly. Apparently I will be triplicated in
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 13 Dec 2013, at 00:51, LizR wrote:
On 13 December 2013 07:04, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Dec 2013, at 18:31, meekerdb wrote:
Is it true that you're transferring to the University of Uruguay,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 13 Dec 2013, at 00:51, LizR wrote:
On 13 December 2013 07:04, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Dec 2013, at 18:31, meekerdb wrote:
Is it true that you're transferring to the University of Uruguay,
Bruno: Where do that [Calabi-Yau Compact manifolds] comes from?
Richard: There are the most immediate consequence of all string theories
where the extra dimensions beyond 4D spacetime must precipitate out of 3D
space.
Harvard physics Prof. Vafa describes the Big Bang as 2 dimensions folding
up
Bruno: Why do you want emulate RA? Simple animals emulates RA, billiard
ball, Gàc gas, your computer, yourself, all emulate RA.
Richard: I am proposing that the finite 3D array of 10^90/cc compact space
particles are a computer for implementing RA.
I must have used the word emulation improperly.
Hi
You can order Augason Farms 30 day emergency supply of food from Walmart online
at
http://www.walmart.com/search/search-ng.do?search_query=Augason%20Farmadid=224211189655wmlspartner=wmtlabswl0=3536268310wl1=ewl2=walmart%20augason%20farmswl3=15081448341veh=sem
Free shipping, they
Order now, as prices are rising on this emergency food supply.
Subject: You can order Augason Farms 30 day supply of food from Walmart
onlineat
Hi
You can order Augason Farms 30 day emergency supply of food from Walmart
online at
Order now, as prices are rising on this emergency food supply.
Subject: You can order Augason Farms 30 day supply of food from Walmart
onlineat
Hi
You can order Augason Farms 30 day emergency supply of food from Walmart
online at
Walmart 30 Day Emergency Food Storage Pail Augason Farms Review
Video at- Roger Clough
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRtg5YKddQo
$89.00 on sale from $90.00 at walmart.
free shipping, order online at
Of course, tolerance is better than nothing. But most implementations still
ignore MPI (Merchant Person Indeterminacy), and so even in environments
where possession is tolerated, anybody engaging in a commercial transaction
or anybody on the production side is still fair game... which you can
On 13 Dec 2013, at 13:17, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Bruno: Why do you want emulate RA? Simple animals emulates RA,
billiard ball, Gàc gas, your computer, yourself, all emulate RA.
Richard: I am proposing that the finite 3D array of 10^90/cc compact
space particles are a computer for
Hi Chris,
According to the Vostok
data, we're in for another ice age, in say 10,000 years or so.
jcs-online,theoretical_physics_board,-
mindbr...@yahoogroups.com,everything-list,4dworldx
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
Hi Hans Dieter Franke
A great place for hackers to start to be an identity imposter
is www.healthcare.gov (if that's the right address).
No or little security.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email
On 13 Dec 2013, at 13:17, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Bruno: Why do you want emulate RA? Simple animals emulates RA, billiard
ball, Gàc gas, your computer, yourself, all emulate RA.
Richard: I am proposing that the finite 3D array of 10^90/cc compact space
particles are a computer for implementing
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Any time John Clark pretends that he does not understand or believe in
first-person indeterminancy,
But I do believe in and understand first-person indeterminacy, in fact it
was without question the very first thing that
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
I *do *know who I am in the first person,
But there is no reason to believe that the knowledge you're talking about
is in principle unique; the copying machine can duplicate the first person
view just as easily as anything else.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:22 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Any time John Clark pretends that he does not understand or believe in
first-person indeterminancy,
But I do believe in and understand
Hi Bruno,
Why does an entire universe need to be simulated? Could not just finite
portions of some universe be simulated, that which is perceived by the
observers (however such might be defined). Why does it seem that a god's
eye view needs to be simulated? BTW, David Albert's argument
2013/12/13 Stephen Paul King stephe...@charter.net
Hi Bruno,
Why does an entire universe need to be simulated?
It does not... it is an example showing that the substitution level could
be arbitrarily low... anyway as I said some years ago, if the level is that
low, I don't see how
On Dec 13, 2013, at 10:22 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Any time John Clark pretends that he does not understand or
believe in first-person indeterminancy,
But I do believe in and understand
On 12/13/2013 5:51 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Hope the US and Uruguay take this into more consideration. Seizures of 6-7 figure
amounts of cash and product, do represent conflict of interest, for first officers on
the scene, before they've been counted. Officers have bills to pay too
On 13 Dec 2013, at 19:37, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Why does an entire universe need to be simulated?
?
If I (third person self-reference) is Turing emulable, then the
entire universe is certainly not emulable, nor even well definable.
Could not just finite portions of
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
One told me: I see in my diary that I predicted (in Helsinki) that I
would be at both places, but I see now that this was wrong
I predicted? In such a situation that would only be a half truth, it
would be much more
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 13 Dec 2013, at 19:37, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Why does an entire universe need to be simulated?
?
If I (third person self-reference) is Turing emulable, then the entire
universe is certainly not
I must admit I'm more likely to say yes if the Doctor in question is Matt
Smith :)
On 14 December 2013 11:09, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 13 Dec 2013, at 19:37, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi
Seems to be a tiny CO2 spike at the right hand end. The resolution on that
graph is too low to really see a mere 50 or 100 years I guess.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
33 matches
Mail list logo
