To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:00 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I have not attempted to do a detailed math analysis of all or the forces
acting in any of these particles
Why am I not surprised?
other than the entron. I
-0700, John Ross wrote:
Attached is the section of my book that describes the structure of the
alpha particle.
John R.
As Liz said, there's no detail or explanation here. We know that Coulomb
forces follow the inverse square law, right? I really don't know what you
accept or reject from
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:59:45AM -0700, John Ross wrote:
I assume you would agree that a photon is self-propelled.
No. What does that even mean?
Protons and alpha particles are also self-propelled. They are
sel-propelled by their own internal coulomb forces. Electrons, protons,
atomic nuclei
be arriving in about
one week.
John R.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:32 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 15 May 2014 04:59, John Ross jr
of perpetual motion!)
On 14 May 2014 05:45, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
This would be a lot simpler if you would let me send you a copy of my book
(free of course and autographed). Just let me know your mailing address.
You can call and leave it in a message (858-646-5488 tel
-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 5:43 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:23:44AM -0700, John Ross wrote:
The alpha particle is comprised
.
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 5:49 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:50:46PM -0700, John Ross wrote:
LizR
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 12 May 2014 11:50, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
LizR,
Are you suggesting that just because there is an existing description of the
proton that we should not try to develop a better description?
No, I'm suggesting that you need a reason
On 12 May 2014, at 12:05 pm, John Ross wrote:
He (Stephen Hawking) believes science has become too complicated and we
need a theory that can be understandable in broad principal by everyone, not
just a few scientists.
Are you quite sure that was Stephen who authored that thought or Stephen
saying
...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 12 May 2014, at 12:05 pm, John Ross wrote:
He (Stephen Hawking) believes science has become too complicated and we need
a theory that can be understandable in broad principal by everyone, not just
a few scientists.
Are you quite sure that was Stephen who authored that thought
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 3:44 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 13 May 2014 04:28, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I think my theory is a simple as possible. You should read my book. Let me
know
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 5/12/2014 3:36 PM, LizR wrote:
On 12 May 2014 23:53, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 12 May 2014, at 12:05 pm, John Ross wrote:
He (Stephen Hawking) believes science has become too complicated and we
need a theory that can be understandable
: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:38 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 13 May 2014 11:29, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I don’t believe I have claimed that my theory is “superior” to existing
theories or that it will “work better” or that it is an “explanatory
: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kim Jones
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 5:14 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 11 May 2014, at 6:00 am, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I suggest you get a copy
: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 6:23 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 11 May 2014 12:13, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 11 May 2014, at 6:00 am, John Ross jr
On 11 May 2014 07:07, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Tronnies are point particles. They have no mass. The tronnie’s only property
is its charge of plus or minus e. Its charge of e means that it is continually
producing Coulomb force waves that travel at the speed of light. It repels
better).
On 9 May 2014 14:06, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I am a patent attorney. During the past 13 years I have documented my theory
at eight times in its development by filing patent applications attempting to
patent process for modeling things like electrons. My
in broad principal by everyone, not just a few scientists.
John R.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 3:07 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 12 May 2014 08:18, John Ross
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 5:00 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 10 May 2014 04:06, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Good questions.
The Black Holes gravity is very constant because
Of John Clark
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 10:39 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:29 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Coulomb’s Law requires that the basic particle with single charge must be a
point particle. If it had any
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 7:47 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:03 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
My theory does not violate conservation of mass-energy.
And all
, 2014 7:23 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:39 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
A 928 MeV photon is a very high energy photon. It is off the scale of every
chart I have ever seen of the electric magnetic spectrum. Why
to helium
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 7:10 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 06:03:49PM -0700, John Ross
to provide the inflation period of our successor Universe.
John R.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 6:44 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 9 May 2014 13:15, John
composed of 3 tronnies as well?
Cheers
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:32:46PM -0700, John Ross wrote:
Three entrons are comprised of a total of six tronnies. An electron and a
positron together comprise six tronnnies.
The electron and the positron are each comprised of three tronnies. I could
Another excellent question!
Coulomb’s Law requires that the basic particle with single charge must be a
point particle. If it had any size at all, parts of the particle would repel
the other parts and it would blow itself apart at the speed of the Coulomb
which is the speed of light. Like
you a copy if you will promise to read it with an open mind.
John R.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Ruquist
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 6:21 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
John Ross
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 6:55 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:18:47PM -0700, John Ross wrote:
Thanks for the comment. I make the same offer to you that I just made to
Russsel.
I must say
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 8 May 2014 13:18, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I must say however that I am not aware of any portion of my theory that is at
odds with observation. I know that it is greatly at odds with existing
theories.
A few have already been
There is nothing wrong with the standard model and relativity theories. The
question is are they perfect? The other question is: Is there a better theory?
Congratulations to you for looking at my summary at Amazon.com. I assume you
saw my quote from Stephen Hawking’s Book, The Theory
explain it in detail?
John R
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 7:47 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:18 PM, John Ross jr
and a
positron.
This statement contradicts the earlier statement. An electron is either
composed of three tronnies, or three entrons (in which case they're composed of
six tronnies).
Hopefully this is a typo. Maybe John Ross will elaborate
] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 7:47 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:18 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I must say however that I am not aware of any portion of my theory that is at
odds
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:41 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:25 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
The neutrino photon disappears in the course
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
JR: The Coulomb force also provides the gravity holding galaxies together.
RR: What, there is not even gravity in your theory?
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
There is nothing wrong with the standard
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:18 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 08 May 2014, at 17:46, John Ross wrote:
I have math to prove that the integrated Coulomb forces between the two
tronnies in an entron, one +e and one -e
I am a patent attorney. During the past 13 years I have documented my theory
at eight times in its development by filing patent applications attempting to
patent process for modeling things like electrons. My applications have been
repeatedly rejected by the USPTO. However, they have in the
: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 6:53 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 7 May 2014 13:31, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
My theory does not include the neutrino. It does include neutrino photons
which have the same structure as all photons. But it has
forces.
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 7:14 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:31:08PM -0700, John Ross wrote
could
have gotten so large as it is.
John R
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 8:02 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:53 PM, John Ross
Of Russell Standish
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 3:43 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:54:26AM -0700, John Ross wrote:
A small percentage of neutrino photons from our Black Hole are temporarily
stopped by interaction with electrons in stars
Thanks for the comment. I make the same offer to you that I just made to
Russsel.
I must say however that I am not aware of any portion of my theory that is at
odds with observation. I know that it is greatly at odds with existing
theories.
John r
From:
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 6 May 2014 07:00, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Here are the first 14. You can see more of my model at Amazon.com.
I don't wish to be contrary, but most of those aren't predictions. A prediction
has to involve something that can
-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
2014-05-06 17:32 GMT+02:00 John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com:
All 101 of my “predictions” are predictions. I looked up “prediction”. It
means: “Something foretold or predicted”.
You do not predict anything about observed things... your
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:56 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
What is your experiments evidence that the electron does not have an internal
structure?
I don't have any evidence that the electron has no internal structure, and I
have
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:56 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
What is your experiments evidence that the electron does not have an internal
structure?
I don't have any evidence that the electron has no internal structure, and I
have no evidence the electron isn't
, 2014 at 04:38:16PM -0700, John Ross wrote:
Electrons are created in pairs and destroyed in pairs. So why does it
appear that there are more electrons than positrons? I explain that there
are exactly the same number of positrons in our Universe as electrons. This
is because I know
to summarize your ideas. Most people here
are fairly open minded and smart as hell. If your ideas can be expressed
mathematically, so much the better.
Welcome,
Terren
On May 3, 2014 1:24 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Some of you may be interested in taking a look at my new book
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 9:51 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 4:05 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I believe I address every major issue in physics, from the internal structure
I checked them out on U-Tube. Pretty funny.
J Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 4:53 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
I thought that book was something to do
Some of you may be interested in taking a look at my new book, recently made
available at amazon.com. It is:
TRONNIES
The Source of the Coulomb Force
And
The Building Blocks of Universes
Just go to amazon.com, click “books” and search for
far no one to my knowledge has proven any of them incorrect.
I have been working on this thing for 13 years.
If you co to amozon.com, click “books” and search for “tronnies”, then click
“look inside” twice, you will see a table of contents.
John Ross
From: everything-list
Some of you may be interested in my model of our Universe in which I propose
that the fundamental building blocks of our Universe are tronnies each of
which is one-half of nothing, with no mass and no volume and a charge of +e
or -e. I have attached a copy of the first portion of my latest patent
Kris Kristofferson sings, Nothing ain't worth nothing but its free.
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Meeker
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:36 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Why is there something
to 10 places.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Mazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross wrote:
I have not dealt with Mercury's orbit.
This is one of the most
! After all, he reckons Einstein goofed,
and that relativity is a load of old cobblers, so having nonzero
restmass particles traveling at the speed of light wouldn't be a problem
for him!
Kindest regards,
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Russell Standish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Ross
07, 2005 4:30 PM
To: John Ross; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
This means that beta decay proves your model wrong.
- Original Message -
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Stephen Paul King' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday
. I understand neutrinos travel at the
speed of light. Only photons travel at the speed of light.
-Original Message-
From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 4:30 PM
To: John Ross; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
Message-
From: Jesse Mazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross:
Thanks for the response.
Yes my theory involves a lot of math. Have you read my patent
application
Name one.
-Original Message-
From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:27 PM
To: John Ross; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
There are a lot of experiments that have detected neutrinos and verified
their properties (which
of neutrinos is in the range of 300 mev!
-Original Message-
From: Russell Standish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:00 PM
To: John Ross
Cc: 'Hal Ruhl'; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
According to special relativity, anything with a positive
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:04 PM
To: John Ross
Cc: 'Stephen Paul King'; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:11:04AM -0700, John Ross wrote:
* Only photons travel at the speed of light. (Except my tronnies
Because there is only one particle (and its anti-particle) and one
force from which the entire universe is built. How could there be
anything simpler?
-Original Message-
From: Russell Standish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:06 PM
To: Hal Ruhl
Cc:
]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7050/full/436467a.html
-Original Message-
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Saibal Mitra
small, but it is not zero.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino
Onward!
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Saibal Mitra' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:49 PM
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
I think
Have you ever heard of the Big Bang and the period just after where
the universe expanded much faster than the speed of light.
-Original Message-
From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:49 PM
To: John Ross; 'Russell Standish'
Cc: 'Stephen Paul King
obtain its energy by capturing the entron of a high energy photon.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Mazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross wrote:
To the best of my
?
- Original Message -
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Saibal Mitra' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'everything'
everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:20 PM
Subject: RE: Tegmark's prediction of neutrino masses
This sounds too weird for me.
-Original Message-
From
this
inverstigation. Please see:
http://davidwoolsey.com/physics/ideas/neutrinoscope/index.html
Kindest regards,
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: RE: ROSS MODEL
Title: Message
You
guys should get a copy of my new self-published book. It is entitled
"A Single Particle Universe, The Simplest Yet Theory of Everything".
According to my theory, the single particle is a mass-less point particle with a
charge of +e or -e. The particles, I call tronnies,
Title: Message
Some
of you may be interested in my new book. It is self published. I
have copied below the summary chapter and the name and addresses of the
book store that is selling it for me.
Chapter
II
Summary
of the Ross Model of the Universe
The
Ross Model
I have
proposed what I
101 - 171 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
