On 30 Oct 2013, at 16:26, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
This *looks* like a description of the salvia experience, but term
like anti-consciousness is a bit pejorative for that, although it
has anti-life aspect, pointing on the fact that theology is not much
pro-life.
That would
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 27 Oct 2013, at 13:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
there is great value in a way to access experience which pretends that it
is not pretending. This is quanta and arithmetic truth.
I would say that is different. It is
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 10:33:51 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 26 October 2013 20:01, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Friday, October 25, 2013 7:09:47 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 26 October 2013 06:23, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
The argument
On 27 Oct 2013, at 13:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:27:11 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 27 Oct 2013, at 02:25, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 7:06:19 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Oct 2013, at 14:04, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On
On Friday, October 25, 2013 7:09:47 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 26 October 2013 06:23, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
The argument against comp is not one of impossibility, but of empirical
failure. Sure, numbers could do this or that, but our experience does not
On 25 Oct 2013, at 19:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, October 25, 2013 10:11:04 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Oct 2013, at 18:53, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:16:55 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 3:30:11 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Oct 2013, at 19:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, October 25, 2013 10:11:04 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Oct 2013, at 18:53, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:16:55 AM UTC-4,
On 26 Oct 2013, at 11:24, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 3:30:11 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Oct 2013, at 19:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, October 25, 2013 10:11:04 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Oct 2013, at 18:53, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On 26 October 2013 20:01, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, October 25, 2013 7:09:47 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 26 October 2013 06:23, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
The argument against comp is not one of impossibility, but of empirical
failure. Sure, numbers
On 27 October 2013 13:25, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Build your non-comp theory. Comp implies the consistency (possibility) of
such theory.
I wish I had time to read all the above, but for now at least the bottom
line seems to be here!
--
You received this message because
On 24 Oct 2013, at 18:53, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:16:55 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:34:05 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
snip
My problem is that you need
to do the math
On Friday, October 25, 2013 10:11:04 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Oct 2013, at 18:53, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:16:55 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:34:05 PM
On 26 October 2013 06:23, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
The argument against comp is not one of impossibility, but of empirical
failure. Sure, numbers could do this or that, but our experience does not
support that it has ever happened. In the mean time, the view that I
suggest
On 10/25/2013 4:09 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 October 2013 06:23, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
The argument against comp is not one of impossibility, but of empirical
failure.
Sure, numbers could do this or that, but our experience does not
On 26 October 2013 12:39, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 10/25/2013 4:09 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 October 2013 06:23, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
The argument against comp is not one of impossibility, but of empirical
failure. Sure, numbers could do this or that,
PS
Post haste :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
and the ultimate
disproof of God)
Peace
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:54:45 PM UTC-4, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 6:13:33 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism
6:13:33 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there can be a true
On 23 Oct 2013, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:34:05 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
snip
My problem is that you need
to do the math to evaluate how much seriously you can take this
remark.
Under comp, why couldn't I just imagine tasting the flavor of
Here's the deal...how about I go to the Garden of Eden and everyone else
keep exploring until we finish. Ill never know the difference..
NOT EDEN PRIME though. And don't think about Red or 42 this time.
Thanks,s
Stephen
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:16:55 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:34:05 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
snip
My problem is that you need
to do the math to evaluate how much seriously you can take
On 24 Oct 2013, at 00:15, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/23/2013 9:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and
false simultaneously. More precisely
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there can be a true
statement whose negation is also true. Such statements are called true
contradictions, or dialetheia
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and
false simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there
can be a true statement whose negation is also true. Such statements
, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Dialetheismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and
false simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there
can be a true statement whose negation is also true
:34:05 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Dialetheismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and
false simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:34:05 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Dialetheismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and
false simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there
can be a true statement whose negation is also true. Such statements
are called true contradictions, or dialetheia.
Dialetheism
/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and
false simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there
can be a true statement whose negation is also true. Such statements
are called true contradictions, or dialetheia.
Dialetheism
Ooops, I did it again, I played with your heart.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief
...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:34:05 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Dialetheismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true
Go meet Roger
Please stop the spamming.
2013/10/23 Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu
Ooops, I did it again, I played with your heart.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view
On 10/23/2013 9:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false simultaneously.
More precisely, it is the belief that there can be a true statement
Stephen Lin - I may be forced to create a filter to automatically delete
your messages if you don't have anything sensible to say. Do you?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Yes I did.
Tomorrow this will be harder but today this is the easiest thing in the
world. Bill Murray? Andie MacDowell? Yes I said yes I will Yes.
Stream of consciousness? Yes, already, after the ghosts in the shells it's
not that easy to be a turtle who's green? Red/green color vision.
Cogito
If anyone is still in doubt that Mr Lin is trolling, try googling Tomorrow
this will be harder but today this is the easiest thing in the world. Bill
Murray? Andie MacDowell? Yes I said yes I will Yes. (including the quote
marks).
As you will see, the most sensible response to this is Oh, cr*p -
On 10/23/2013 3:13 PM, LizR wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More
/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there can be a true
statement whose negation is also true. Such statements are called true
contradictions, or dialetheia.
Doublethink as defined in 1984
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 10/23/2013 3:13 PM, LizR wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
Whereever you go, there you are!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone is still in doubt that Mr Lin is trolling, try googling
Tomorrow this will be harder but today this is the easiest thing in the
world. Bill Murray? Andie MacDowell? Yes I said yes I will
Always take the weather with you. I feel a spam filter coming on.
On 24 October 2013 12:29, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
Whereever you go, there you are!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone is still in doubt that Mr Lin is trolling, try
This is better:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#label/everything-list/141e79c24d12e062http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=634170
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Always take the weather with you. I feel a spam filter coming on.
On 24
I have the perfect James Joyce!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
This is better:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#label/everything-list/141e79c24d12e062http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=634170
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at
This is better:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#label/everything-list/141e79c24d12e062http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=634170
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Always take the weather with you. I feel a spam filter coming on.
On 24
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 6:13:33 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More precisely
45 matches
Mail list logo
