On 20 July 2013 10:57, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, July 19, 2013 8:21:42 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
If a dog started talking in full English sentences without
manipulation by an outside force the
On Sunday, July 21, 2013 8:25:35 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 20 July 2013 10:57, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Friday, July 19, 2013 8:21:42 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
If a dog
...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 02:25:26 +0200
Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
That exist an association does not means that this is a mathematical
topological isomorphism in the brain of the humans shaped by genes between the
space of shapes
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:00:44 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 18 July 2013 23:20, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I did use the term rational perhaps inappropriately. I meant that
some aesthetic choices have evolutionary utility and others not.
Nevertheless,
On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
If a dog started talking in full English sentences without
manipulation by an outside force the explanation must be in the
physics of its body. I don't think this statement is either clever or
controversial. And if the physics
On Friday, July 19, 2013 8:21:42 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
If a dog started talking in full English sentences without
manipulation by an outside force the explanation must be in the
physics of its body. I
On 7/17/2013 10:13 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:55:36 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:04:46 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 2:08 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:44:20 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 12:34:19 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 2:27:14 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:13 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb mee...@verizon.net javascript: wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:13:59 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb meek...@verizon.net javascript:
wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Monday, July
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:55:36 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comwrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar
the asimilation sound-shape applies also to the letters: the letters K and
I of KIKI have a lot of peaks, while B O U and A of BOUBA have more rounded
edges. the forms with Sharp edges are more aggressive, and this is know in
design. For example the rounded edges of the Apple products, that is
Hi Alberto
I wonder if the phoneme for 'ki' is represented by jagged letters in non Latin
based alphabets?
--- Original Message ---
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
Sent: 19 July 2013 2:03 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
Message ---
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
Sent: 19 July 2013 2:03 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
the asimilation sound-shape applies also to the letters: the letters K
and I of KIKI have a lot of peaks, while B O U
and 'angular'.
Same 'curvy' letter though.
From: agocor...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:31:51 +0200
Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
If the alphabet is phonethic , I guess so, because the inventors of the
alphabets also had these innate
On 7/18/2013 4:42 PM, chris peck wrote:
Hi Alberto
But alphabets are not phonemic are they? And some alphabets are curvy (Thai) where as
others are very angular (Chinese)
Even in Latin based alphabets there are going to be difficulties with your view
I think.
The 'c' in 'circle' is essy
On 18 July 2013 23:20, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I did use the term rational perhaps inappropriately. I meant that
some aesthetic choices have evolutionary utility and others not.
Nevertheless, all aesthetic choices must be determined by the physics
of our brain, unless they
.
The 'c' in 'circle' is essy and soft.
But the 'c' in 'cut' is sharp and 'angular'.
Same 'curvy' letter though.
--
From: agocor...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:31:51 +0200
Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
To: everything-list
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
connections between words, shapes, and feelings were
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
connections
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
connections between words, shapes, and feelings were purely computational?
Why not? Being a broken line vs a
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb meek...@verizon.netjavascript:
wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:18:52 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multipl...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb
meek...@verizon.netjavascript:
wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM,
On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
connections
between words, shapes, and feelings were purely
On 7/16/2013 12:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb meek...@verizon.net
javascript: wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:21:27 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb meek...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:44:20 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb meek...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of
On 7/16/2013 2:08 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:44:20 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:18:52 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multipl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the connections
between words, shapes, and feelings were purely computational?
Why not? Being a broken line vs a differentiable line is a computable property. The
difference between
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
connections between words, shapes, and feelings were purely computational?
Why not? Being a broken
38 matches
Mail list logo
