If you see the image in the mirror and interact with it, then there has to
be something conscious somewhere. Just like a human controlling a remote
control car. The consciousness might exist somewhere else, but the car can
behave as intelligently as a human.
Jason
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:55
On 04 Apr 2013, at 18:11, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/4/2013 8:35 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Apr 2013, at 15:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-03-memories-death-real-reality.html
"Working together, researchers at the Coma Science Group (Directed
by Steven Laureys)
On 03 Apr 2013, at 23:53, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Craig Weinberg
wrote:
In a universe of functionalism or comp, I would expect that this
would never happen, as my brain should always prioritize the
information made available by any eye that is open over tha
On 03 Apr 2013, at 16:48, Craig Weinberg wrote:
snip
Computationalism is the opposite of reductionism. It points on the
failure of the reductionist conception on numbers and machines.
But it does so by swallowing whole all phenomena which are not
numbers and machines.
Not at all.
On 4/5/2013 9:38 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
There is no hell
"The hell there isn't!"
--- Billy Sunday
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to e
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 12:38:16 AM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
>
> There is no hell
>
I wouldn't know, but there are stories out there of hellish NDEs.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/08/is-hell-real-people-who-went-there-say-yes.html
"Working with Greyson, Bush identified several
There is no hell
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, April 5, 2013 3:39:52 PM UTC-4, JohnM wrote:
>>
>> I think I side with Craig: NDE is not "N" enough, is not "D" because the
>> 'observer' (gossiper?) came "back" and not "E" - rather a compendium
>> of hearsa
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/04/solid-liquid-states-of-matter/?cid=co6909034
Interesting Wired article. I think it supports the view that physics
actually still has a poor understanding of how microcosmic models scale up
to basic macrocosmic qualities. It seems clear to me that simplis
On Friday, April 5, 2013 8:01:12 PM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, John Clark >
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Telmo Menezes
> > >
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > wait for the Nobel prizes ceremony. That way you can be assured to
> only
> >> >
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, John Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Telmo Menezes
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > wait for the Nobel prizes ceremony. That way you can be assured to only
>> > hear about the most respectable Scientific endeavours.
>> Anything else would be a waste of your time.
On Friday, April 5, 2013 6:47:00 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> Why are all of your actions "obviously" due to subconscious influences? If
that were the case why would personal awareness exist?
>>>
>>> Your actions are
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Craig Weinberg
> wrote:
Why are all of your actions "obviously" due to subconscious influences? If
>>> that were the case why would personal awareness exist?
>>>
>>
>> Your actions are due to physical processes in your brain which move your
>> muscles, but you are
On Friday, April 5, 2013 3:39:52 PM UTC-4, JohnM wrote:
>
> I think I side with Craig: NDE is not "N" enough, is not "D" because the
> 'observer' (gossiper?) came "back" and not "E" - rather a compendium
> of hearsay (s)he stored previously about "D"-like phenomena.
> When a (human or other) c
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
> There probably isn't a general learning algorithm there are just lots of
>> lesser learning algorithms,
>>
>
> > Then you need a higher-level algorithm to decide which lesser algorithm
> to use for each situation.
>
Yes, or use a rule of thum
I think I side with Craig: NDE is not "N" enough, is not "D" because the
'observer' (gossiper?) came "back" and not "E" - rather a compendium
of hearsay (s)he stored previously about "D"-like phenomena.
When a (human or other) complexity dissolves (= death) nobody comes back to
tell the stories. Th
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
> > wait for the Nobel prizes ceremony. That way you can be assured to only
> hear about the most respectable Scientific endeavours.
> Anything else would be a waste of your time.
This isn't a mathematical proof where I have all the informati
On Friday, April 5, 2013 10:30:29 AM UTC-4, Jason wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Bruno Marchal
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On 05 Apr 2013, at 00:07, Craig Weinberg wrote (to Jason)
>>
>> There are algorithms for implementing anything that does not involve
>>> infinities.
>>>
>>
>> Why
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 05 Apr 2013, at 00:07, Craig Weinberg wrote (to Jason)
>
> There are algorithms for implementing anything that does not involve
>> infinities.
>>
>
> Why do you think so? What algorithm implements purple or pain?
>
>
> What make you thin
On Friday, April 5, 2013 9:41:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 05 Apr 2013, at 00:07, Craig Weinberg wrote (to Jason)
>
> There are algorithms for implementing anything that does not involve
>> infinities.
>>
>
> Why do you think so? What algorithm implements purple or pain?
>
>
> What
On 05 Apr 2013, at 00:07, Craig Weinberg wrote (to Jason)
There are algorithms for implementing anything that does not involve
infinities.
Why do you think so? What algorithm implements purple or pain?
What make you think that purple or pain don't involve infinities?
(Also, many algorithm
On Friday, April 5, 2013 4:50:29 AM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
>
> I have a explanation of NDE experiences that is incomplete because it is
> based on evolution, and the evolution of a trait rarely obey a single cause
> not even a set of causes , because natural selection is holistic. Altho
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:09 AM, meekerdb wrote:
> On 4/4/2013 3:50 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Telmo Menezes
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Craig Weinberg
I have a explanation of NDE experiences that is incomplete because it is
based on evolution, and the evolution of a trait rarely obey a single cause
not even a set of causes , because natural selection is holistic. Although
some of these causes may be the main ones in the evolution of a certain
tra
23 matches
Mail list logo
