On Sunday, July 21, 2013 8:25:35 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On 20 July 2013 10:57, Craig Weinberg >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Friday, July 19, 2013 8:21:42 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
> >>
> >> On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> >>
> >> >> If a dog started talking in full Engl
On 20 July 2013 10:57, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, July 19, 2013 8:21:42 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>>
>> On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> >> If a dog started talking in full English sentences without
>> >> manipulation by an outside force the explanation must be in th
On Friday, July 19, 2013 8:21:42 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg >
> wrote:
>
> >> If a dog started talking in full English sentences without
> >> manipulation by an outside force the explanation must be in the
> >> physics of its body. I don't think this s
On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>> If a dog started talking in full English sentences without
>> manipulation by an outside force the explanation must be in the
>> physics of its body. I don't think this statement is either clever or
>> controversial. And if the physics of the dog's
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:00:44 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On 18 July 2013 23:20, Craig Weinberg >
> wrote:
>
> >> I did use the term "rational" perhaps inappropriately. I meant that
> >> some aesthetic choices have evolutionary utility and others not.
> >> Nevertheless, all aesthetic c
nitely looks like a tree so I'm sure your onto something. :)
From: agocor...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 02:25:26 +0200
Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
That exist an association does not means that this is a mathematical
topological i
think.
>
> The 'c' in 'circle' is essy and soft.
>
> But the 'c' in 'cut' is sharp and 'angular'.
>
> Same 'curvy' letter though.
>
> --------------
> From: agocor...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul
On 18 July 2013 23:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>> I did use the term "rational" perhaps inappropriately. I meant that
>> some aesthetic choices have evolutionary utility and others not.
>> Nevertheless, all aesthetic choices must be determined by the physics
>> of our brain, unless they are determi
On 7/18/2013 4:42 PM, chris peck wrote:
Hi Alberto
But alphabets are not phonemic are they? And some alphabets are curvy (Thai) where as
others are very angular (Chinese)
Even in Latin based alphabets there are going to be difficulties with your view
I think.
The 'c' in 'circle' is essy and
;c' in 'cut' is sharp and 'angular'.
Same 'curvy' letter though.
From: agocor...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:31:51 +0200
Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
If the alphabet is phonethic , I guess so, b
riginal Message ---
>
> From: "Alberto G. Corona"
> Sent: 19 July 2013 2:03 AM
> To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
>
> the asimilation sound-shape applies also to the letters: the letters K
> and I of
Hi Alberto
I wonder if the phoneme for 'ki' is represented by jagged letters in non Latin
based alphabets?
--- Original Message ---
From: "Alberto G. Corona"
Sent: 19 July 2013 2:03 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Cross Modal Synesthetic Abstraction
t
the asimilation sound-shape applies also to the letters: the letters K and
I of KIKI have a lot of peaks, while B O U and A of BOUBA have more rounded
edges. the forms with Sharp edges are more aggressive, and this is know in
design. For example the rounded edges of the Apple products, that is als
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:55:36 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>>>
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:13:59 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb >
> wrote:
> > On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> >
> > On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg >
> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
> >
>
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 2:27:14 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/17/2013 10:13 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
> On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb wrote:
>
> On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
> On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg
> wrote:
>
> On Monday, July 15, 2013
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 12:34:19 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
> On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg
> wrote:
>
> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> Would this kin
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:04:46 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/16/2013 2:08 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:44:20 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:55:36 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Craig Weinberg
>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb w
On 7/17/2013 10:13 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would t
On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb wrote:
> On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
> On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> Would this kind of universality of human sense
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
connections between words,
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
>> connections between words, shapes, and feelings were purely c
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:18:52 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 7/15/2013 2
On 7/16/2013 2:08 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:44:20 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>>
>>> Would this kind of universality of hum
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:44:20 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of
On 7/16/2013 1:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:21:27 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:21:27 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/16/2013 12:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Wei
On 7/16/2013 12:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb > wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making
On 7/16/2013 12:37 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
connections
between words, shapes, and feelings were purely comp
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:18:52 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb
> > >
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> >>
> >> Would this
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb
> > wrote:
>
>> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
>> connections between words
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
> connections between words, shapes, and feelings were purely computational?
>
>
> Why not? Being a broken line v
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb wrote:
>>
>> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
>> connections between words, shapes, and feeli
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb wrote:
> On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
> connections between words, shapes, and feelings were purely computational?
>
>
> Why not? Being a broken line vs a differe
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the connections
between words, shapes, and feelings were purely computational?
Why not? Being a broken line vs a differentiable line is a computable property. The
difference between
39 matches
Mail list logo
