is there a way how i can setup automatic BCC in outlook. i have a user here
that wants to monitor all outgoing mail on her staff mailbox.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Ed has this saying about fixing bad behaviour with technology. Check
with HR first if this is acceptable company policy. You would probably
have to script something to run on each each users computer to fill in
that specific email address in the bcc field. Hell no, brrr don't go
this way.
Sander
Sorry but I've seen this link here already a couple times but this site is
not been updates since may 2001
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ek2 SDK, client Meeting
We used to be allowed to wear loincloths and hunt wild game with
spears.
Some Americans still do. I'm thinking of Ted Nugent... :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 10 January 2002 20:56
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation:
As Sander quite rightly says, check with HR that this would ok. You could
alternatively give the user permissions to share the member of staffs
mailbox, so that the user can periodically check his/her sent items.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite
Hoping this can help you:
Try to use the IADs:PutEx
get the value to the var myString and Set
Obj.PutEx ADS_Property_Delete, Alt-Recipient, Array(myString)
See the ADSI SDK in the Help
António José E Cabrita
-Original Message-
From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hey! That was *my* quote from the Sunbelt list, not William's! :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 10 January 2002 22:02
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: High Physical Memory Utilization
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory
~DEL can be used to remove data from specific fields in the user
properties. It certainly works for the directory import approach/
-Original Message-
From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 09:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchg 5.5 ADSI Scripting
Bacon?
-Original Message-
From: Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anti Spam
Can someone recommend a good (cheaper if possible) anti spam product.
_
ok, check this pst scenario:
exchange site in uk, 450 users, 400mb mailbox limit, 30gb store.
servers are located in london, remote sites in northern cities connect via
2mbps links.
users often hit the mailbox limit and have to archive to pst. in london,
they just move items to a pst on their
So that begs the question before the rebuild why was it running at 60%? No
hardware change
Does anyone know where I can find the Performance Optimizer Settings? Is it
a registry key or what?
34 answers and no one with any real ideas. Did I ask a stupid question?
-Original Message-
Come on Andy, we all know that bacon isn't cheap. It also can lead to
serious issues when installed in a Exchange server. About the only good
thing would be the smell
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:37 AM
To: Exchange
Thanks!
PutEx ADS_PROPERTY_CLEAR, Alt-Recipient, vEmpty
did the trick.
The export-import was a good idea for a workaround had this not been
available. Thanks for the replies.
bob
_
List posting FAQ:
Ok I think I found out why my server is freezing in the morning. I came in
today the backup (backup Exec 8.0) was still running it seemed to finish one
drive but the other did not finish. So I attempted to cancel the job that
was running but it wouldnt cancel. Then I tried to stop the
Are we talking about an Exchange online backup here?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: remeber server freezing
Ok I think I found out why my server is freezing in the morning.
yup
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remeber server freezing
Are we talking about an Exchange online backup here?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
ADSI scripts...
Look at Thomas Eck's Windows NT/2000 ADSI Scripting for System
Administration.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
Then what do you mean by It seemed to finish one drive?
What are you backing up?
What the errors in the event logs?
Can you do a backup with NTBACKUP?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Frazer,
The Performance Optimizer Settings are scattered all over the registry.
You can view them with regedit @
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeDS,ES,IMC,IS
Etc.\Parameters.
You can also run the Performance Optimizer in read-only mode to view the
current setting.
I havent. But if i had the problems you are experiencing i would uninstall
it and use NTBACKUP instead. You seem to have pretty much found the cause of
your problem. Now do something about it.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
Fix the routing.
We route a mixture of RFC1918 and public addresses on our networks with no
problems. And we've got a LOT of networks.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
I havent ried backing up with nt backup yet
I am doing a full backup of all the hard drives + registry + exchange dir
and IS
I was able to stop the registry backup that was scheduled after the full
backup of the hardrives and exchange. In Event viewer it showed that I
cancelled that job
Oh there was one error in Bexec that Alerter server Failed to logon to Mapi
with the username and password given.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remember server freezing
Thats for for the job notification email.
When did the backups start failing? Nothing has been changed?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remember server freezing
Oh there was
You're full of crap.
That's a perfectly acceptable hardware configuration, assuming the unstated
configuration (drives and processors) are reasonably well configured.
The physical memory usage is per spec - its Dynamic Buffer Allocation.
Frazer - get a copy of Paul Robichaux's Managing
Richard,
Does it do this everytime you run the backup job through Backup Exec, what
happens if you run the job manually. Any errors or comments in the Backup
Exec job log? Are you doing anything else at the same time as backup, batch
jobs, updtaes, anti-virus? Backup Exec 8.0 can be updated to
Ever heard of a calculator???
85,754,376/4081/1024= 20.5MB average mailbox size.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Nope. BCC To
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002
How antispam do you want to be??
One could run one of the BSD (Free or Open) free Unix Oss and use postfix or
smtpd as a relay to clean up a lot of it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
Check out www.isaserver.org. It's a great site with lists, faq's, and
tutorials. You should be able to find your answer there. I believe you will
find an article on this subject in their Learning Zone.
-Original Message-
From: George Guzic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Buy a new desktop machine with a 60GB IDE drive. They're cheap, and all you
need is the space to do the recovery.
I bought a machine for my daughter in early December that would be able to
act as a restore test machine for any of our servers for less than $500. It
doesn't have to be a server
Exchange 5.5/SP4 Win2K/SP2 and OL2000
At the begging of the week we merged to previously independent exchange
organisations into the same site using move server wizard to join one to the
other. On the whole it seems to have gone OK but ... a few users have
reported that when they move files
There arent any filters present on any of the Outlook sessions are there?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Harrison, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 14:28
To: Exchange
Dear All,
Sorry to bother you again with this Connector for Lotus Notes connecter
thing (@#%* :-(. Still no e-mail flow from Exchange to Notes. Number of
messages stuck in the Outbound to Notes queue: 3408 (and counting).
When I try to start the Convert Exchange to Notes process (Exchange
Have you re-applied sp4?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 14:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: Message Number 54101 (was
Try just backing up the IS and the directory. Don't run the backup on
anything else - no drives, and have you made sure you have excluded the swap
file from the backup? Anyway, try a real Exchange-only backup and then see
if it locks up.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
Hi
We are using Ex 2000
My account has 2 SMTP address rom 2 different domain
How do I do to post an eMail from the SMTP address that is not the primary ?
Possible ? With OL XP we can have only one Exchange profile.
I would like to be able to stay in the same Outlook Session to do it if
What crack pipe are you smoking out of? Those specs are way beyond what's
necessary!
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
400 Mailboxes
I'll bet he does! I'll bet I do and still will! I'll bet there are a lot
of us out there that didn't over-spec our servers...
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High
Follow Ed's Never Restore method and you won't ever need to do a single
mailbox restore. Might have to do a whole server restore - hardware does
fail, but you won't be plagued with the onesy-twosy requests.
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Steffen M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Typically, I don't think you have a friggin clue about what you're talking
about. I've had a 20gb+ store on a box running with 512MB of RAM. It
worked just fine...
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:35 PM
To:
Sorry boss, I'd venture to say you know a lot less than most of us. My SQL
box running a QMS app doesn't even use that much hardware and it's waaay
more over tasked resource-wise than my Exchange server.
Sounds like you robbed someone blind...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Memory usage on Exchange is whatever exchange wants to use. If it wants a
gig of RAM, it will take it, if it wanted 2gigs of RAM, it would take it.
I suggest you read some more...
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002
That's a network problem, not an exchange problem...
D
-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
How many, and what speed is your processor on your Exchange
As others have pointed out, you don't need a server-class machine for a
recovery server.
For that matter, I have never needed to use a recovery server. Why? I use
the Ed Crowley(tm) Never Restore(c) Method(sm)!
For full details on this method, send 150 Euros and an unused thong to the
address
Someone would have to be on some good drugs to over-spec a server like that.
I guess we're the unfortunate bunch with actual real world budgets to work
with... ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:42 AM
To: Exchange
Customize your Outlook XP toolbar with a button that opens up Eudora Lite, Netscape
POP, or Outlook Express, set up to send as that user. Click that button to open that
client and send the message.
Please note that if it's one account, you WILL NOT post from the 2nd address from
OWA. Either
May be worth running the /cleanviews switch and/or having a look at the
mailboxes in question using the Exchange 5 client.
Tris
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From:
No, it isn't. Read the FAQ's. Specifically, read the Ed Crowley Never
Restore method. It is good advice for anyone and a sound practice as well.
Combining Deleted Items Retention with hiding mailboxes for a set period of
time will all but nullify the need to ever restore a mailbox. I have
lol no it just sittin in my basement ready to be launched tomorrow like that
movie office space.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remember server freezing
Have you fixed that
I'm saving it for less headaches in the future.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
What are you saving that 99% processor and 20% RAM for, exactly?
seems to freeze only when i do a data backup meaning the hard drives without
exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remeber server freezing
Try just backing up the IS and
are you sittin in the basement like that movie office space?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, January 11, 2002 09:05 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: remember server freezing
Subject: RE: remember server
no not yet at 630 i will with phat case of bud on my lap
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remember server freezing
are you sittin in the basement like that movie office space?
I believe he is sitting under the bridge like in the story.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 15:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Is Bud your dog or your boss?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remember server freezing
no not yet at 630 i will with phat case of bud on my lap
-Original Message-
No, I didn't. Do I have to re-install SP$?
Regards,
Olivier
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
That my son
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remember server freezing
Is Bud your dog or your boss?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Thats one of the steps i would take in trying to find a resolution.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 15:16
To: Exchange Discussions
So because you cannot afford to spec a server appropriately you decide it's
best to flame everyone else that can.
If your read the original post correctly you would have seen that I was
making a recommendation. The recommendation allows for future growth of the
database and the least amount of
Sounds to me like you just waste money.
You can always beef up a server later if needed.
Maybe you should evaluate your own tactics with upper management.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange
Don - lack of experience - ouch!
The real world has to adapt. I could spend far too much money on a server
that should last 5-8 years. But then I would rather spend money on a server
that suits the company needs now and for the next 3-4 years and replace it
with one after that time. And if I ask
And another comment Mr. Ely.
Let's keep this in mind next time you decide to flame me or someone else on
the list.
I'm simply giving my opinion. Acceptance is optional. I'm giving my
opinion of a server spec for exchange server that in my opinion has giving
me the best level of
I still have a hard seeing this machine running efficiently for 5-8 Years +
why buy such a large machine when for less money you could buy several
smaller machines and eliminate the SPoF
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
10 years?
10 Years? 10 Years?
10 years?
10 friggin years?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
And another comment Mr. Ely.
I guess it depends on your situation. If policy dictates that Exchange
Server is classified as a critical system I would think you would want to
spec the system appropriately.
Secondly, getting what you want from upper management is a skill and
requires good salesmanship and good political
A system that is good for 5-8 years? So you are currently running systems
that were state of the art 5-8 years ago? Do you have Exchange running on a
486-DX2 with 128MB of RAM?
BTW, from a financial standpoint any system that old is already fully
depreciated. I suspect your support costs for
EXCUSE ME!!! It's not that I nor my company can't afford your server
spec, it's the fact that I KNOW how to spec a server whereas it seems you
DON'T.
Your recommendation SUCKS! You recommended a system that should last 5-8
years!!! ROFLMFAO! PuH-LEASE! Technology changes too fast, NO
Yes Exchange is critical and it the money is given accordingly. To spec a
machine for 10(!) years would probably require us to either reduce services
elsewhere or lose a member of staff as there is a finite budget. If I need
something and can justify it with sensible business sense, I normally
Yeah, I'm soo lacking in experience... I tell ya...
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
Don - lack of experience - ouch!
The real world has
And another comment Mr. Ely.
Let's keep this in mind next time you decide to flame me or
someone else on the list.
I'm simply giving my opinion. Acceptance is optional. I'm
giving my opinion of a server spec for exchange server that
in my opinion has giving me the best level
Please, most of us here wrote the book on how to sell to management...
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
I guess it depends on your
Your opinion sucks... But please, continue sharing. I needed a new
whipping boy, Tener's not up to it...
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory
I agree. The 5-8 years was a little far-fetched. However, I was simply
trying to make a point. My goal is to get the most I can now. 3 years
from now I'll do it again.
And another point
You guys are stuck on the mentality that I might be overpaying for
something.
I would like you to
Uh huh... Start back trackin now, you gotta long road to hoe...
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
I agree. The 5-8 years was a little
I was merely referring to my experience. I don't want to give anyone the
wrong impression. I have only been in the business 10 years. Much less
than some of you on this list. However, during this time I've come to the
conclusion that more is always better.
-Original Message-
From:
Not really. He states his opinion by flaming others opinions. Just seems
rude to me but maybe that's just the way he is...
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory
Then my point is taken.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
Please, most of us here wrote the book on how to sell to management...
D
-Original
Yes Don, now stop using other peoples computers to read this list and get
back to that coffee making
;0)
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002
Exchange Stores on 10 year old spindles
::SHUDDER::
Thinking about MTBF, you probably would have replaced the drives before the
got that old.
Thinking about replacing drives, I wonder about the odds of getting a *new*
drive for a five year old server. eBay refurbished maybe...
and this from a non-profit organization..
wow.
Tom Gray, Network Engineer
All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATT Net: (919)960-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 15:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
and this from a non-profit organization..
wow.
Well if they don't have profits, they have to waste all that
Maybe so...
And your opinion is different, to say the least.
All that really matters is that I'm happy with my setup and your happy with
yours. Now the person whom originally posted the question has the
opportunity to decide whether to implement your solution or mine.
I am happy with my
Is it just me or does it seem odd that you would get so upset about the
hardware I choose to implement on my network? I'm not purchasing hardware
and implementing it on your network.
Although you probably wished I wereThen maybe you would have some decent
servers.
-Original
Hey now. A non-profit organization that saves lives
Everything is critical in the blood business. Ever heard of Hippa?
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory
You know, had you not sent out that quickie sharp comment no you don't
when faced with Dr. Dogg's server specs, your opinion might hold some
water. But when you start out the conversation confrontationally, basically
accusing the fine doctor of lying to us all, you gets what you deserves.
Your
*sigh* The reality is there is a large level of variance in terms of what
one might want to spec out for a server. I think Mr. Murphy's specs are a
tad high on RAM, but at the ATE sessions for MEC this year, I routinely ran
into people who were asking about their E2K servers with 3GB of RAM
Funny, I have smooth running servers, happy users and happy management all
in one big bundle.
Are you saying that the more money spent, the better the systems run? Seems
to be a rather ignorant perspective...
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
But the person who originally posted the question asked why it was running
at high processor usage. The answer was 'by design' (though running
performance optimizer is needed if it hasn't already been done). Unless
there are any problems other than this feature, he doesn't need to implement
any
I Spec systems for 8-10 years but they have their own internal nuclear power
source :)
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:36 AM
To:
Well we are making the switch from a Eudora email server to a Exchange 2000
setup. The new Zone records will be sent to our ISP Verio. We are hoping all
updates to other DNS servers will in place by Monday. Anybody think it will
take longer than 48+ hours. We make the change request today at
Yeah, he can come and count my 1000+ implementations as well... They're
spread across the world though, so it might be an expensive trip for him...
D
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Stop it, stop it now!
My memory is not high
I am not on drugs!
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
More is not always better... Efficiency is always best!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
I was merely referring to my experience. I
If'n they'll change the serial number on their DNS server, the updates will
begin automagically. Otherwise, 24-72 hours is the norm...
You should ask them though...
D
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange
I haven't even begun to flame you! I'm sure there are those around here who
will attest to that... It gets much better than this...
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Damn it Don, you're just wrong. The more money you spend, the better your
systems will run... that is if you spend large sums of money bringing me in
to do a design and operations review. Bring me in for $230k to do a 2 week
consulting gig and if you're not completely satisfied I'll refund .100%
I am trying to migrate a user from Notes to Exchange. The Microsoft
Exchange Migration Wizard doesn't complete the task. I get an error
message that says: The address book is unavailable. Check that the
Microsoft Exchange Server is still available. That is not the case,
Exchange is running
Don:
Can you send me a softcopy of that book?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious
LMAO!! OK OK, you got me on that one. Of course, for that much money, I
could do that myself. VBG
D
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
Damn
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
