I have an upgraded 5.5 server now on E2K sp2 which responds with FTP type
browsing when accessing the OWA.
I'm not getting any errors. I had to follow a few Q's as the exchfilt.dll
did not swap to the new version on upgrade, not sure if this is related.
Also the /exadmin virtual was missing. I
Try the mbinfo utility - you may have to call Premier Support but I think
it's free.
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 May 2002 23:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
Thanks for looking
I appreciate this is probably down to my misunderstanding of this virus, but
we have one user who is being sent an html file
As soon as the email is clicked on, the attachment is attempted to be opened
by Outlook. Then Officescan flags up that there is a file in the users temp
internet folder
Try someone like www.c2c.com - their Active Folders product may do this.
Otherwise just try the various 3rd-party vendors listed on the MS exchange
website.
-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 May 2002 17:03
To: Exchange Discussions
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 09:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Klez in attached html
I appreciate this is probably down to my misunderstanding of
this virus, but we have one user who is being sent an html file
Re-boot the server
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 08:31 am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K
I have an upgraded 5.5 server now on E2K sp2 which responds with FTP
type browsing
I have many times.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 10:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K
Re-boot the server
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
My limited experience in campus messaging solutions has a faculty staff
that would benefit from the collaborative features of Exchange with
students that end up using POP as their email access.
Perhaps a Linux mail solution is in order for the students with an
Exchange Server for the faculty?
Was it working before you applied E2K sp2 ?
Is this the only server or is it a FE server ?
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 10:28 am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K
I
Well, speaking from personal experience, Exchange 2000 is a fairly serious
undertaking, and unless you are looking for the advanced features of
exchange (group calendering, scheduling, collaborative applications etc),
the licensing is probably going to be the main killer unless the university
has
Only server. It has never worked, always behaved like this.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 10:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K
Was it working before you applied E2K sp2 ?
Is this the only
I am looking for a product that is able to replicate exchange data from
one datacenter over the wire to another location. Is there any products
that provided this type of off site replication??
_
List posting FAQ:
Can anyone tell me if the first version of MSMail (the one made for the
MAC) shipped with its own postoffice or was it simply a client for other
post offices.
Also when Microsoft purchased Network Courier did they use that to make
Exchange or MSMail.
TIA
Exchange 2K
:)
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 12:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Products to replicate Exchange data over the wire
I am looking for a
Do a two-hop relay. Use some other SMTP server to get the mail from the
website first. Then have it relay to this Exchange server. Only allow
relaying from that other SMTP server. ORDB can test all they want - the
front-end is not an open relay and they can't blacklist it.
On the second note,
You don't need to block HTM and HTML files, but you do need to be doing some
basics.
Personally I would use the full list in appendix J.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Klez in
Huh?
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Products to replicate Exchange data over the wire
Exchange 2K
:)
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 14:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Klez in attached html
You don't need to block HTM and HTML files, but you do need
to be doing some basics. Personally I would use the full list
Machine is Win2k SP2 with all critical and security updates applied, running
IE6 with all patches/updates from windowsupdate.microsoft.com
Mails coming thru exchange server with scanmail running latest Trend pattern
file
Desktop is also running Trend officescan with latest pattern file
I have some weird stuff going on with our org. We have 6 exchange servers
in 4 sites.
1st site- 1 5.5 SP4, 1 2k SP2
2nd site- 1 2k SP2
3rd site- 1 5.5 SP4
4th site- 2 5.5 SP4
1st site- Site connectors to 3,4 - Routing group Conn to 2. Dir Rep Conn to
all
4th site- Routing group conns to 1,3,4
Explains why they're making 3000 ignite people redundant.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 14:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Products to replicate Exchange data over the wire
Huh?
-Original Message-
From: Louis
Doesn't really explain anything Mark. 3000 of my colleagues losing their
jobs isn't really a comical subject.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 14:39
To: Exchange
Yes, a small joke. Exchange is a peice of software that can replicate to
another exchange server.
But none the less, a joke.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002
And as Martin suggested the answer wasn't the most helpful you've
submitted.
Mass redundancies are never funny but one must adopt a positive stance
in the face of adversity.
Now, about that solution for Wade, what do you think..
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL
MS Mail was purchased to compete with CC:Mail.
I can't confirm the name of the company that was bought to get the core MS
Mail product. However, MS did very little development work on the product
before releasing it.
The original product was DOS based, and worked well for small groups. MS
built
http://www.amtsoft.com/geocluster/
Geocluster will replicate Exchange data to alternative data centres and
is supported by MS subject to being on the relevant HCLs and other key
parameters.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold ()
Sent: 21 May 2002 14:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks for the idea, but the lockups have happened days apart. I've run the
application event log up to 20 Mbytes to try and catch any more weekend
events. Exchange logging is set to MEDIUM on most of the IMC objects that
are involved with mail transport.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac
Hi folks,
I need to recover a specific mailbox from backup tapes for exchange 5.5. We
are no longer doing brick-level backup. Can anyone offer any advise on this
as to how I can recover this particular mailbox without interrupting users
on the system. Many thanks.
Mustafa Ibrahim
Has anyone here had any problems with AOL users connecting to OWA? I have a few users
that are having issues, they can't authenticate. It isn't the AOL browser either,
I've had them try to use IE when logged in. I just wanted to ask prior to setting up
a test AOL box, oh the horror. Is
use exmerge.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recovering a specific mailbox from backup
Hi folks,
I need to recover a specific mailbox from backup tapes for exchange 5.5. We
are
I have users that come thru AOL to get to my OWA, and the issues I always have with
them is they want to use IE from AOL, not IE from Microsoft.
If your AOL users didn't download the IE directly from MS, then they are using an IE
that doesn't connect to OWA. I just make copies of the IE 6.0
Usual option is a Disaster Recovery Restore onto alternative hardware,
either by DR restoring the entire box off the production LAN or by hot
spare recovery (which I tend to define as a server on the production
network with a live DS and blank stores onto which you restore the IS)
Once done, then
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recovering a specific mailbox from backup
Hi folks,
I need to
I know this deals with Lotus Notes and everyone frowns on it. But I
know someone out here has some kind of knowlegde of this product. Your
opinions are appreciated.
Thanks,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL
Has anyone found a way to migrate information from Russell Calendar
Manager (RCM) to an Outlook Calendar?
RCM has an ASCII export feature that just does not work.
We are running RCM on OpenVMS and our users have recently moved to
Outlook 2002 and would like to port their old calendar data over.
I use OWA to Exchange 5.5 to two different companies. One is SP3 and
other is SP4. Works the same over AOL and ATT. Using IE 6 on W2K SP2
with all public security hotfixes.
HTH
Mike O'Toole
system Engineer
--- Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone here had any problems with
Andy, Steve and Mark Thanks a lot guys. Your help is much appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 15:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering a specific mailbox from backup
This horse was beaten to death, revived and beaten to death again. Archives
are your best friend. Basically the summary of all advice given on the
subject is: the best limits are those that accommodate your business needs.
EP II was good. It's not Harry Potter in space like the first one.
...Officescan flags up that there is a file in the users temp internet
folder with Klez... Why wouldn't scanmail be stopping this file? I havent
in the past considered that we should be blocking htm and html, but should
we?
Stop and read what you just wrote Niki. Why isn't adding *.htm and
Just confirmed last night and Microsoft classifies Geoclusters as a
Vendor-supported solution
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Saturday, May 18, 2002 12:24 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Exchange Redundancy
Subject: Re:
I actually followed the procedure on the DR paper to recover the mailbox. In
the end recovering just one mailbox proved to be much less challenging than
I'd anticipated and the info contained in the Paper proved sufficient for
the task.
I now to change scenario to whole server recovery. ...and
Make sure that the data that is to be recovered is more valuable to business
than the cost of recovery before proceeding. Digest all the info in the
fine link Mr.David provided while management is chewing on that.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Can I suggest you start with drawing yourself several diagrams:-
1) Routing - all routes/connectors/etc
2) 55/AD Replication - all Connection Agreements/SRS/Dir Rep Cons/etc
3) PF referral/affinity paths
Then overlay them and find the gaps. It's surprising how a decent diagram
can show up the
The original question (that was violently snipped) asked about both content
and virus scanning (hence the subject line Virus/Spam filtering). It is
true that TrendMicro is very good on the virus scanning side, its eManager
plug-in is just a mediocre content filter. For virus scanning, Sybari's
Wander?
Try a good general purpose hardware diag like ForeFront
And it was the guy beside me that threw it... I swear!
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:33 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Hot to
Also check file-level AV, NTFS compression, write-back caching, and
open-file managers... In case Fred didn't mention those
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:33 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation:
Symantec has recently upgraded their NAV for Exchange to also include
Content/Spam filtering as well, and have gone to a nice GUI for
management. This is only good for E2K though, and they have not
announced any plans to port it to 5.5
hth,
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN
Reason I said that Jim is that this all happens at the point an identically
named file is received as an attachment thru our Exch server to his Outlook
client
As far as I'm aware the machine is fully up to date, both the virus
definitions on the exchange server and the desktop AV software, and
I have found with Scanmail it passes the HTML, but not the attachment.
A couple of quesitons. What do you mean wrong information store version?
What version SM? What version and SP are Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21,
Mediocre might be too kind.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering
The original question (that was violently snipped) asked
about both content and virus
i have a user trying to get his mail thru POP3, the message delivery keeps
runing and the amount of unread messages keeps adding but he doesn't see
any new messages in his mailbox.we checked thru outlook webaccess and also
thru exchange he has a bunch of mail but he can't get it thru POP3 server,
Check his views, rules, et al.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POP Server
i have a user trying to get his mail thru POP3, the message
delivery keeps runing and the
Why is the FAQ method not an option for moving?
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch2k server move
So we are going to do the big move to day, and naturally
things are
ForeFront ? Do you have a link?
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error
to which faq are you referring? I haven't been able to find anything other than the
MS disaster recovery for exch2k white paper outlining exactly how to bring up a
recovery server. i'm not doing a mailbox move... i'm moving the whole godforsaken
installation to another machine.
I concur. I update the content manager daily and it still only stops about
10% of our SPAM.
As well, there is a nifty little bug that wipes out your custom settings
every time you update the pattern file. Even with the fix from Trend it
still does it.
The rest of their products I am pretty happy
Thanks,
He has no rules setup and I checked his views too no help,
But I created another PST folder and it worked .could be that his PST folder was
corrupted .but he was getting his mail from another email account to that folder.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Bashir Malekzada
AOptix Technologies , Inc.
The FAQ referenced in the bottom of e-mails sent to the list. Appendix A I
believe.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch2k server move
to which faq are you referring?
You lost me
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Dunno... PST files are inherently unstable, so I guess its possible.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP Server
Thanks,
He has no rules setup and I checked his
He just likes the idea of pain.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch2k server move
You lost me
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Hello,
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not able to buy
excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan thunder k7).
We want to restore uor server from backups to a different machine whis is 1 proc, AMD
Athlon. Is it possible to restore it
And that product sucks!!! I just talked with their tech yesterday about
several questions I have, and even they admit that since it's a version
1.0 product, there are lots of bugs to be worked out. I wouldn't
recommend it for production use any time soon...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
You should be able too.
The keys are having the same OS and SP, and the same Exch SP and hotfixes.
And read this
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:32
The hardware can be different. You just need the same O/S and Exchange
level (version, sp etc). The only thing that might go wrong in your case is
that the previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be
single proc HAL.
Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site
Please email your questions to me offline; I'm interested in what they
are. I have this product in production right now. You're talking
about SAVfMSE 3.01, right?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:49 AM
Posted To:
I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message body ...
I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD controller .
So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.
So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD controller ? Once again thanks
for any advie
Check with NetIQ. I think their AppAnalyzer tool might be able to do that. Of
course, it's pricey.
-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that
Use both settings: authenticated users and by IP. The two are inclusive. That is,
the IMS will accept mail from authenticated users, and from listed IP's.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Rissen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Call Microsoft PSS... They'll walk you through it. Best $245 you'll ever spend.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:08 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
Subject: RE: restore
btw...I think if you upgrade ScanMail to the ESE version, it then does allow
you to determine the stale mailboxes.
dave
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check
I can think of a hundred better ways to spend 245 dollars.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
Call Microsoft PSS... They'll walk you through
Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last
night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of
our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?
Do we need it?
Thanks,
Arch
That will solve his problem?
http://flyingpenguinproductions.com/boards/
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
I can think of a hundred
I just installed Exchange 2000 and am having difficulties finding things where there
used to be. I used to set Exchange 5.5 so that I could see (in the eventvwr) when
messages flowed in and out of our site (via IMS connector). Is there a way to do that
now?
Thanks,
Arch
There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Drive m:
quack
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
That will solve his problem?
http://flyingpenguinproductions.com/boards/
-Original
M: drive just allows access to your Exchange server via the file system
(i.e. Windows Explorer). Although it may have some applications, I've never
heard of anyone using it extensively. You definitely can live without it.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham
To all the girls I've loved before
Who traveled in and out my door
I'm glad they came along
I dedicate this song
To all the girls I've loved before
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that I can
forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan the M: and gets an error
thrown... my backup software.. which also uses the disaster recovery otpion tries to
do the same... and it gets an access
Are you on crack?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
To all the girls I've loved before
Who traveled in and out my door
I'm glad they came
To all the girls I've cracked before...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
Are you on crack?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka
I hope you have good backups
-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that
I can forward you .. I mean
title or mating call?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
quack
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Doh!
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that
I can forward you .. I mean my
I guess he meant to send it to the other exchange list.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
Are you on crack?
-Original
There is no M: drive.
-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are
some reports that I can forward you .. I
Why yes.
Yes I am.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
Are you on crack?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clearly this is the To All The Girls I've Loved Before virus
striking yet again.
Robert J. Razler, Esq.
Approvals Manager
Heritage Building Group, Inc.
Suite A-100
3326 Old York Road
Furlong, PA 18925
215.794.0550, ext. 1117
Hey all
I'm maving quite a few problems with my exchange server move (yes I tested
it and none of this stuff happened in test so I'm stuck with it). I'm
moving from one server to another and into another container. I was using
a 3rd party tool that failed me completly in the live
I am having problems with my Exchange 2000 SP2 and OWA.
When I am OWA, it wants the Office 2000 Standard CD, when I click on New Mail. Then
it will NOT display the global address list, it only lists the items in the contacts.
HELP!!
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
In late on this, but Q314917 helps understand what is going on when you get
these errors. May not help in this case but good to keep abreast of.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Parkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
Okay, I wasn't really thinking about golf clubs, booze, football tickets, or vacation
travel.
So I guess it's just The best $245 of your company's money you'll ever spend when
there's a server down and you don't know what the hell you're doing.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris
There is no M: drive...
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange
Hey all
I'm maving quite a few problems with my exchange server move (yes I tested
it and none of this stuff happened in test so I'm stuck with it). I'm
moving from one server to another and into another container. I was using
a 3rd party tool that failed me completly in the live
There is only Zuul.
(2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference)
JP
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
There is no M: drive...
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
OWA does not render the GAL.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Crumbaker, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:58 AM
To:
Give me something simpler gozzer.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:05 PM
To:
Sure there is. He has evidence. I have evidence. We've all seen it. It was
just an unfortunate implementation on MS part.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
We're a smaller
company(
40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been
very stable (knock on wood).
My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to
Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix
it
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
